Why Is The Universe Perfect?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 6K

  • @HistoryoftheUniverse
    @HistoryoftheUniverse  3 ปีที่แล้ว +616

    Hope you are enjoying the first second of existence (bit of a tangent this video, but an important part of the puzzle!) Next month let's find out what happened after particles gained mass. Spoiler: nothing not weird.

    • @chris94kennedy
      @chris94kennedy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      i love your channel, please never stop!

    • @jamesdolan4042
      @jamesdolan4042 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      For the last 199,900 years constants of nature did not exist in the minds of us homosapians. Did the constants exist then? A million year explosion is occurring in the Orion nebula. Is that fine tuning?
      Another excellent, exciting and challenging video presentation. Thank you.

    • @Vortex-7358
      @Vortex-7358 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      13:26 max planck? nah max plonk

    • @liberty-matrix
      @liberty-matrix 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Enjoying in an understatement, I'm learning. Thank you for imparting your hard earned knowledge. It really improves the way I look at my life.

    • @robdeskrd
      @robdeskrd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      There is no evidence for fine tuning in the sense that is used by scientists, why does the universe seem perfect for the evolution of life as we know it?
      Because life as we know it what could evolve in these conditions, it doesn't need to be anything more than a consequence of the conditions, notice I didn't say inevitable consequence just a consequence

  • @kriterer
    @kriterer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4015

    The simplest answer is that the universe is perfect from our point of view because we were created by it and are governed by its laws, so it couldn't be any other way.

    • @jacobcampos2407
      @jacobcampos2407 2 ปีที่แล้ว +204

      Yeah like what is perfect. I argue nothing is it just is what it is. If it created life then great but if it didn’t then we wouldn’t be able to ask this question at all and does that mean it still wasn’t perfect? Maybe not

    • @aqe7914
      @aqe7914 2 ปีที่แล้ว +80

      Also universe created the notion of some imperfections so that we could call it perfect? Where did the concept of perfection came from?

    • @aqe7914
      @aqe7914 2 ปีที่แล้ว +58

      You are talking about observable insanely complex domino effect, this seems to be precodnitioned

    • @Cluedinage
      @Cluedinage 2 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      Kind of like a puddle marveling at the perfect indentation that cradles it? Are we really as fluid as puddles? Didn't they make the opposite point in this vid?

    • @fredriksvard2603
      @fredriksvard2603 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      The intelligent design argument is ridiculous, its not finetuned for life at all. Why create matter that expands into heat death with molecules forming conscious beings that struggle on the crusts of globes of other matter.

  • @RyanTheHero3
    @RyanTheHero3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +384

    I think we can say with great confidence that the creation of consciousness in this universe is the greatest phenomenon ever seen. Out of all the ways this universe fascinates us, the reality that self-awareness was created from some combination of unconscious matter is more mind-blowing than anything else

    • @w花b
      @w花b 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      I'm gonna go crazy just thinking about all these things without any answers. Why so sudden? Is there really no explanations? I'm not surprised religion exists because everyone would go nuts if they constantly thought about it.

    • @howmathematicianscreatemat9226
      @howmathematicianscreatemat9226 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wow, I screen shot this, it’s so touchingly written. If you mind I delete but I just couldn’t help it, it has a very exciting touch to it. =)

    • @Spectre-wd9dl
      @Spectre-wd9dl ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Unless matter is conscious.

    • @cyonu5675
      @cyonu5675 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @silksonic3927 mate the universe ain't even 1 trillion years old

    • @Arunava_Gupta
      @Arunava_Gupta ปีที่แล้ว +16

      The idea that consciousness is generated from matter is one of the most horrific mistakes that scientists and modern day intellectuals have made. Consciousness, or rather the conscious personality, is *fundamental*. It's a _separate ontological category_ .

  • @Chrisbajs
    @Chrisbajs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +636

    The quality of (some) TH-cam videos has far surpassed the old fashined medias like television. It's amazing what level of quality and insight we can stumble upon while surfing YT, and thanks to the algoritm of recommendations, I was fortunate enough to find this utter gem.

    • @laskei
      @laskei 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      yes I know a list of best channels on YT but they are mostly under 1m subscribers, wish yt will make sth like Netflix so we can pay to watch high quality videos or short documentary like this one in order to increase income to those channels, now its kinda free with a little of advertisement but I dont think income from youtube ads can help them invest on their big projects.

    • @Strangeship1997
      @Strangeship1997 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@vhawk1951kl No, it was made for the internet.
      Also you realize that tv(classic cable type) is dying right? With less than half the population even having it(not even mentioning watching it), and that percentage is only decreasing with time(as the older demographics which hold a higher percentage of cable slowly die out). The internet will not die(at least not anytime soon), it will take over from the tv as the telephone did for the telegraph and email did for mailing letters.
      The only way the internet would be destroyed is if civilization itself completely collapsed(in which case the internet is not that big of a priority as food and shelter). While if the internet died, then modern civilization would follow it to the grave(with everything today being networked(which is objectively better in every single way)).
      PS, you really shouldnt use the Tower of Babel(i prefer tower of bullshit but to each his own) comparison as it doesnt really work at all(neither does lot and his city(salt of the religious as their “arguments” shatter under the great weight of logic and his brother, consistency)), actually a better religious comparison would be the cleansing of the temple(from the internet’s perspective) or judas(from cable tv’s perspective)

    • @bigcheddar7856
      @bigcheddar7856 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Then the comments be like...

    • @jedfra9172
      @jedfra9172 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vhawk1951kl Says the man subscribed to a huge number of YT channels on the er...so called internet. Pathetic, hypocritical creature indeed.

    • @Dawdan4
      @Dawdan4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@vhawk1951kl stop doing drugs pls

  • @Nicolas-L-F
    @Nicolas-L-F ปีที่แล้ว +148

    "Planck, had unknowingly, invented quantum mechanics" I hate when that happens, so relatable

    • @anmolagrawal5358
      @anmolagrawal5358 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      One fine day you are about to goon and mid session you come across this world changing idea which you have to write down.
      But now that it is recorded, you can choose to publish it anytime so for the time being, you can focus on gooning.

    • @oidbio2565
      @oidbio2565 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yeah it’s a daily occurrence for me. Lol

  • @andicandy66
    @andicandy66 2 ปีที่แล้ว +707

    A small token of my appreciation… one of my favorite channels, fascinating topics and clear, well researched explanations. Thanks! Andrea

    • @HypnosisBear
      @HypnosisBear 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @Christopher Huxley cuz why not?

    • @Daniel-sm5vy
      @Daniel-sm5vy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @Christopher Huxley Nobody knows, it's one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics

    • @infecta
      @infecta 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Daniel-sm5vy i read that while he said that, just so you know your comment had perfect timing

    • @supahdupahplayahmacknumbah1
      @supahdupahplayahmacknumbah1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Christopher Huxley why don't you donate $50.01? Seriously.

    • @owenbartrop8963
      @owenbartrop8963 2 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      @Christopher Huxley because he knew you were going to put your 2 cents in.

  • @DannyBeans
    @DannyBeans 2 ปีที่แล้ว +499

    The simulation hypothesis has the same problem that the panspermia hypothesis does: it kicks the problem farther down the road without actually answering it. Whoever's running the simulation has to live in a universe that has constants compatible with life, so the question remains of how those conditions arose - just one level higher. I'm not saying the hypothesis is necessarily wrong, but it absolutely doesn't answer the question.
    Editing to simplify/clarify my position: given that we are in a simulation, two questions that arise are "what conditions allow the simulation to be run?" and "how did those conditions arise?" *These are exactly the same questions the simulation hypothesis purports to answer about our own universe,* and the hypothesis is meaningless if those questions can't be addressed.
    Another edit: if, as has been suggested several times in this thread, the intelligence running the simulation isn't subject to the same natural laws that we are, does that not inherently contradict the assertation that a "fine-tuned" universe is actually necessary in the first place?

    • @gunterstrubinsky9452
      @gunterstrubinsky9452 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Not necessarily. We are limited in our imagination that this is needed. In any case. Each simulation needs rules and a start condition. Since the simulation also simulates time, the simulation calculation of the next nanosecond in our 'universe' can take 42 million years of our simulated time on the outside since there is a different outside 'time' but for us it seems to be one Nanosecond that has passed as this is the simulated time. That all on the quantum level is probability and works just fine unless we observe it at the micro level, there is no need to compute each elementar particle. Everything in the simulation is only as complicated as it is observed. The galaxies are only a few of points when you look at it. The simulation has only to calculate more whenever an observer looks at a small part through tools. Only that small part needs to be calculated. Like in a video game. Only what the observer looks at is finely granulated. Whatever happens in the 'world's' outside is more abstract and much easier and quicker to compute. Entanglement could be to compared to multiple pointers to one memory location. A bug? Dark matter and dark energy seems like wrong starting parameters.

    • @gunterstrubinsky9452
      @gunterstrubinsky9452 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      theoretically there could be only a few observers be present and the rest are simulations. Like scientific results can be presented to the observer as papers without the experiments, proofs, failures. When I am at 30m distance to a tree, the image I see is rough, only when I stand directly in front of the tree, what is in my limited visual field needs to be calculated in a fine granulation. the backside, the crown are farther and don't need to be 'shown' that precise down to the subatomic level. That saves a lot of calculations.

    • @Flyingmsdaisy
      @Flyingmsdaisy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gunterstrubinsky9452 Mic Drop!

    • @maythesciencebewithyou
      @maythesciencebewithyou 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      @@Flyingmsdaisy not at all, what he wrote wasn't clever at all. Danny is correct that the problem is just pushed further back.

    • @juliahello6673
      @juliahello6673 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Doesn’t mean it can’t be true though

  • @Titus873
    @Titus873 2 ปีที่แล้ว +307

    I am so impressed how you perfectly combined a relaxing, and low, background music with such a fantastic narrative.
    So many science documentaries that are terrible mixed and are anything but a relaxing lecture. This is not the case.
    Its amazing how you control the aspects of the narrative, the pauses, the emphasis, the mistery and the logic with a precise description.
    Your voice sounds from heaven. Thanks for your fanatstic job.

    • @robertthomas4234
      @robertthomas4234 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      ..sorry bro, I nodded off while composing my appreciative reply!! You were sayin...?!😋

    • @jamesjennings4206
      @jamesjennings4206 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sort of like the difference between a good professor and a great professor, I seem to remember the great story teller's and the ability to keep me in the moment

    • @ahklys1321
      @ahklys1321 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hop off his ding-dong please.
      Why oh why must people *gush* their enthusiasm.

    • @j121212100
      @j121212100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      yup, the production quality is top notch.

    • @forestcityfishing4749
      @forestcityfishing4749 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah but hes full of crap and always tries to sneak in a big lie. Like "this women was the one who invented it all" false stuff like that.

  • @BHJBHJ424
    @BHJBHJ424 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    Documentaries on the Universe (heck, even the solar system) make me feel both totally irrelevant and totally unique and priceless at the same time

    • @Justamanwithoutaplan
      @Justamanwithoutaplan 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And when you pair that with the crumbling manifestation of consciousness that is the human condition what do you get?

    • @karlvonbahnhof6594
      @karlvonbahnhof6594 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Right, we are nothing but in the same time miracle of life and on the top of evolution right here, right now...

  • @armadillotoe
    @armadillotoe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +137

    The ability to see an event in mathematical terms is something I have always envied.
    This video has a lot for my old fossilized brain to absorb. I am familiar with some of the concepts but not with all. Thank you.

    • @buttercxpdraws8101
      @buttercxpdraws8101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Yeh. I wish I could understand the language of maths, especially as it relates to astronomy and astrophysics.

    • @w花b
      @w花b 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@buttercxpdraws8101 just need someone patient enough to teach you right. That's the hardest part, the rest seems trivial next to it.

    • @ibrahimkayikci2146
      @ibrahimkayikci2146 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@buttercxpdraws8101 Actually I can recommend you a book on this, where mathematics is explained as an art and how it translates the Universe as a virtual language;
      Measurement by Paul Lockhart.

    • @movingurbanly4346
      @movingurbanly4346 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      the braiin is nt the mind nor a comuter thats masonic naturalism

    • @snailnslug3
      @snailnslug3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Everything is math first. An explanation to a question is answered through math. In all parts of the world. Universal language is math.

  • @l2127
    @l2127 3 ปีที่แล้ว +517

    I enjoyed every second of this wow. These are the things I think about almost daily but never put the research into and you’ve just done it all so perfectly!

    • @Gnarlac
      @Gnarlac 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ironically perfect

    • @Markerface
      @Markerface 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Kelvin what If I think I’m bad at math? In other words I need a good math teacher.

    • @jessehanson6120
      @jessehanson6120 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Ditto. I always knew I was differently wired than the other children in school while I was growing up. I found myself unchallenged and frankly bored in class, as everything was just repetitive and not enough to stimulate my mind. It wasn't until I was in high school and my teachers had all told me that I was unique and highly intelligent, that I truly understood the exponential levels beyond the other students, that my mind was capable of reaching. I would essentially daydream the majority of time about the universe and how the world around me worked. I was able to visualize things that others wouldn't even begin to be capable of comprehending, all in my mind, without having seen an example of what a black hole would look like or how particles and cells intertwine together to make everything in the observable universe. Later in highschool I had a very well versed teacher who taught science class. Chemistry to be exact. But he told me that what I was visualizing is not unlike what Einstein saw in his mind, what he referred to as "thought experiments". So this teacher of mine told me to get my IQ tested. I did and when I did they decided to test me again to make sure it wasn't a fluke. They said my IQ was in the 160 range. This was a huge ah ha moment for me as I always knew I wasn't normal. I was also later diagnosed with Asperger's, which connected even more dots for me, figuratively speaking of course. I suppose I got a bit off track there and forgot where I was going with that for a moment. The bottom line is that it takes a unique type of mind to be able to think about our spatial surroundings and to be able to comprehend nature in a micro and macro scale or quantum visualization of cells and to be able to see a massive object like a the planets. And now in this modern time of scientific breakthrough and discoveries it's so validating to know that I am seeing the world the way it truly is.

    • @jrockkkk
      @jrockkkk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@jessehanson6120 Not reading all that i'm sorry or good for u 💕

    • @jessehanson6120
      @jessehanson6120 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @johnny no need to. I only wrote that comment under the pretence that you might possibly have an above average intelligence level, but based on your most recent comment you can just disregard what I said

  • @Brucebod
    @Brucebod 2 ปีที่แล้ว +119

    I love to watch your videos. I watch them late at night when all is quiet and I can immerse myself in the visuals and sound. They fire up my imagination spectacularly and I then can then drift to sleep with ease. Thank you for the work you put into these. I much appreciate them!

    • @Dennzer1
      @Dennzer1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      👽

    • @theostapel
      @theostapel ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I do not know how these emojis work - but your note is clearly expressed and so inspiring.
      Fare thee well.

  • @hgracern
    @hgracern 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Just brilliant as always. Calm clear diction, no distracting music. Incredible info expressed beautifully. ❤❤❤

  • @poppatang4216
    @poppatang4216 3 ปีที่แล้ว +89

    It’s amazing how I’ve loosely tossed around this idea in my head for years and then a video like this perfectly sums up what I could not verbalize myself. Thank you all very much

    • @nickromo8195
      @nickromo8195 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Now you're going to start to see it everywhere thanks to the bader meinhoff phenomenon

    • @pureog1479
      @pureog1479 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s crazy how you can entertain ideas on your head but not really be able to put it all together. I’m glad these TH-cam makes do it because I know it isn’t easy

    • @gregdemeterband
      @gregdemeterband 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Poppa Tang, please read my comments included...it may surprise you my Friend.
      Also, a book called, The Phoenix Fire Mystery by Silvia Cranston; all the great minds mentioned here in this video, are bearing their Souls with quotations from each one and other famous philosophers who now believe in God...

    • @Farvadude
      @Farvadude 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      i also had this idea roughly when i was studying biochemistry in college. a few years later i found out about the cosmic fine-tuning question on the internet. i wouldn't be surprised if a lot of people around the world in the past 50-100 years have come to some part of this conclusion on their own and many eventually stumble upon the evidence for fine-tuning online now

  • @matthewgumabon7498
    @matthewgumabon7498 2 ปีที่แล้ว +303

    I think it’s cool to think that we (intelligent life) are the universe’s attempt to experience itself. The universe arranged itself in such a way to create beings that could sense and interact with its surroundings and even ponder itself and it’s purpose.
    We are the very thing that we have toiled for generations to understand.

    • @hussainkhan-fg1lv
      @hussainkhan-fg1lv 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe the constants can be taken as proof of us living in a simulation clearly the values of constants had to have been chosen selectively by some intelligence for the universe we know to exist perhaps which is why the concept of god is so prevalent in our culture and we get to be the neo of this story and uncover the juicy secrets of this universe, perhaps its is time that we as humanity forget our differences and focus our energy on the research and discovery of the world we live in and embark on journey of adventure and discovery through space time as one big family
      Ps I know thinking like this is way beyond optimistic but its oddly humbling to type such comments 😊

    • @eggy7684
      @eggy7684 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      VERY TRUE

    • @dododog5002
      @dododog5002 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Damn this comment hit me

    • @NaKh96
      @NaKh96 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      So the univers created itself then created us to experience itself? That's not cool to think, that's not even rational at all.

    • @dododog5002
      @dododog5002 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      @@NaKh96 lmao you're thinking about it wrong. We are made up of material from the universe, being conscious to observe the thing we are made up of is what they are saying

  • @Urgleflogue
    @Urgleflogue 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    In my universe the constants of nature produce quite good wine. Thank you, great tuner in the sky.

  • @etebanlujan2974
    @etebanlujan2974 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This channel speaks to me as if we're on the same page.
    Like we all know about quarks, electrons, blackholes, cbr and quantum entanglement...We've all heard of these theories and equations, now let's talk about them more.
    I appreciate this type of science on a spiritual level.

  • @simpsonyellow
    @simpsonyellow 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Thank you for yet another incredibly high quality release. This channel is my absolute favourite little spot on TH-cam.

  • @spacekiwikit
    @spacekiwikit 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Watching your videos is like preparing for a wedding..Something old, something new, something borrowed and something blue..But always told in such a smooth and entertaining way, you can't help but be mesmerised by it.I love the mention of the Hitchhiker 's guide!

  • @TheAC130E
    @TheAC130E 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    This is some fire content, I remember why I love physics so much, reality is some much cooler than fiction could ever do justice

    • @GennUSA
      @GennUSA 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You have me on a whole new concept of thinking. That reality is far more infinitely interesting than fiction. In a way, our imaginations are essentially infinite, yet the more we look at reality, it's as vast if not more. Thank you, I will be thinking on this for a long time!

    • @ninjabodyco
      @ninjabodyco 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      what if space is absense of light. so light is your entire life that's chopped into billions of pieces. it's fed directly into your eyes using Fibonacci (golden ratio) code to produce a countdown to death, which creates space in between the light. and when the countdown gets to death, you open your eyes to new life, so you're stuck inside a virtual reality infinite loop almost like you have a oculus headset on that's feeding light into your eyes that creates time that creates age that creates death that creates life in an infinite loop forever and forever in physical world, so you need to open your mind's eye and go inwards to go onwards. maybe.

  • @morganlee2806
    @morganlee2806 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    This is one of the most thought provoking, well presented scientific videos I've ever watched. 👏

  • @jatinbangar4371
    @jatinbangar4371 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    You are so underrated. I follow so many science channels but never came across your channel. Well detailed, clean and perfect narration

    • @aeriagloris4211
      @aeriagloris4211 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Anton Petrov is also great

    • @manualLaborer
      @manualLaborer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And SEA. And Cool Worlds. And Astrum.

  • @HistoryTime
    @HistoryTime 3 ปีที่แล้ว +412

    2.5 million years to andromeda. I still remember the Sci fi series 🤟

    • @marcdemell5976
      @marcdemell5976 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's all a theory and may not be exact ,but close

    • @meloney
      @meloney 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@marcdemell5976 well, a theory in science is not the same as a theory as in "I'm theorizing something". No, the distance isnt exact to a single lightyear, but it's damn close.

    • @bomt6259
      @bomt6259 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@meloney depends where in Andromeda you want to be, 2.5m exact might be the perfect location for me

    • @meloney
      @meloney 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bomt6259 well, it's not like andromeda is a million light-years across xd

    • @-o-light8863
      @-o-light8863 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      In the blink of an eye 👁

  • @DoomSkullYT
    @DoomSkullYT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +194

    i almost always fall asleep listening to this, it's just so smooth listening to these videos. I try to stay awake to actually take it in, but it just happens. Great video as always, can't wait for the next one!
    Also just wanted to say I've recently begun my degree in physics with astrophysics.

    • @lbakicz
      @lbakicz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      i recommend that chapter or any other true crime channels, they are my second option to fall asleep too

    • @mj72633
      @mj72633 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      HAHA me too, I can’t sleep without these now but when I always have to rewind and figure out which part I fell asleep at for the next day!

    • @michelealphonso6619
      @michelealphonso6619 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Congratulations and good luck in your endeavors!

    • @ericfrantti9193
      @ericfrantti9193 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@lbakicz I usually fall asleep around 11turdy 12turdy every night listening to that chapter good shit 😂

    • @Quark.Lepton
      @Quark.Lepton 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hey congrats on your major-great career path! Good luck!

  • @CharlesGorrie
    @CharlesGorrie ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I’m loving having found this you tube channel. It is wondrous. It fills me even fuller of wonder than I could even imagine.

  • @abhishekdas3320
    @abhishekdas3320 3 ปีที่แล้ว +111

    I am glad i subscribed to this channel and 'History of the Earth'. Your content is absolutely amazing and worth binging. Yesterday I re-watched some of your videos and was actually wondering when a new one would drop and here it is. Please keep up the good work and do upload new content in the Earth channel pertaining to the geological evolution.

    • @elias_xp95
      @elias_xp95 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Supreme aww boo hoo, you don't know how to read books.

    • @co2_os
      @co2_os 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wait what!! They have another channel? Christmas came early this year.

    • @mj72633
      @mj72633 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Supreme why are you so angry bro, just don’t watch it if you don’t want haha

    • @mj72633
      @mj72633 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Supreme just don’t watch it then and grab a snickers bro

    • @Joe_Potts
      @Joe_Potts 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Evolution of geology as in how geology over time affected evolution or how the Earth's geology changed (evolved) over time?
      Both sound like amazing topics

  • @alexojideagu
    @alexojideagu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    An Anthropic principle of some kind is a valid argument. If we assume that the universe at an atomic level has no fixed form and is just potential energy, probability and time, with no solid reality, it's possible we could be "seeing" back in time through our instruments and eyes a version of a universe that should exist if we were to exist. We are manifesting our past universe out of an infinite possible number of potential universes. A Feedback loop of mutual creation with no beginning in time other than local time. This is a real hypothesis.

    • @Idazmi7
      @Idazmi7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Science is not about assumptions.

    • @alexojideagu
      @alexojideagu 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Idazmi7 Black Holes were only proven conclusively the past 5 years. Stephen Hawking's entire Hawking Radiation theory was based on assuming black holes exist. And many times he admitted he was wrong on aspects of black holes and made bets with other scientists he lost.

    • @alexojideagu
      @alexojideagu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Idazmi7 Dark Matter is not remotely proven yet. Many scientists base their theoretical work assuming it's real. And calculate it in their theories.

    • @alexojideagu
      @alexojideagu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Idazmi7 String Theory is literally based on assumptions derived from equations. None of it proven yet in experiments.

    • @alexojideagu
      @alexojideagu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Idazmi7 Super Symmetry was assumed to be correct and the basis of all particle physics. But it has yet to be detected by the Large Hadron Collider and it's a major problem.

  • @professorjack2099
    @professorjack2099 2 ปีที่แล้ว +192

    Isn't it crazy that we ARE this stuff that boggles our minds? That at some point, every fundamental "thing" your made of was once part of the very beginning of the universe. WE ARE THE UNIVERSE

    • @bartf656
      @bartf656 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Exactly, and if that is the case it's not hard to figure out what life is? The meaning of life is experience. All we are is the universe trying to experience itself. By universe I also mean God. What was the point of having this magnificent universe if it couldn't experience anything. So that is where the experience of life comes from. And that also makes us part God or God is in us all. And that also makes us all one. Now if only more people would realize this, I think its a number of only 1%. All it takes is 1% of all the people in the world to realize and believe this to upgrade our concuousness to the next level. Whether this is true or not I have no clue, something I learned and I'm absolutely fascinated by it.

    • @jjhack3r
      @jjhack3r 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@bartf656 I came to the exact same solution on my own from doing psychedelics...

    • @quantum-fattie
      @quantum-fattie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      we are "from" the universe

    • @soundrider7025
      @soundrider7025 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@bartf656 Why would you say "universe" but actually mean "god" ? Those two are two different words with 2 very different definitions. We should start to pay a little bit attention to the language we all agreed on. And also, if the -point- of the universe is to experience itself then it is failing miserably. Maybe somewhere far away there are beings that are much better than us but we suck huge ass and we are SOOOOOO vastly stupid which is why we will NEVER explore anything in the universe. So if we are alone, OR if there are other stupid beings like us, the universe is failing to experience itself.

    • @daggermouth4695
      @daggermouth4695 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@bartf656 lol you're not serious are you? Evolution.
      We are not the universe
      We are here for procreation
      Which we fail at
      Every generation we get worse and worse 🤷‍♂️
      It's not for experience it's for procreation and we as humans fail at that.
      Also.
      Please don't talk about science if you think God is real 🤣

  • @NathanHarrison7
    @NathanHarrison7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Another mind blowing documentary. Wow. Thank you for taking the time to create these incredible educational videos and for making them so very interesting and engaging. I wish learning in school was this fun. It seems that the more science matures the more scientist have to go back and re-examine their core ideas. That scientific maturity leads to greater understanding of the complexity of everything here on earth (and in the universe), creates more questions then answers and to understanding there exists more order then once thought. I vote for God. As hard as the belief in Him is, it is harder, for me, to believe all of this Galactic Order, not to mention organic life on Earth, happened by some perfect accident. Time will tell the truth.

    • @thecatsman
      @thecatsman ปีที่แล้ว

      'Some perfect accident'? Maybe you NEED religion Nathan. If you think billions, of years, millions of suns, and perhaps only a few thousand worlds like this one in our tiny sector off the universe = then realize that in nature things happen (or don't happen) because there is never any choice, then you will be as excited as I am about the certainty of complex life throughout the universe. We may never learn about it but it doesn't need a god to make it wonderful. People can be wonderful as well. We are taking our time to learn how to behave, but I would bet my pension you can rely on your own moral intelligence to cope with a god to guide you. Am I wrong?

    • @NathanHarrison7
      @NathanHarrison7 ปีที่แล้ว

      You state your ideas as facts. I expressed a personal idea. Ideas do not need citations but "facts" do. Therefore citations please sir.@@thecatsman

  • @Perks5
    @Perks5 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    How are we even here in the first place is the most simple but unimaginable question to answer

  • @hallamhal
    @hallamhal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +156

    Interesting question, kind of like asking why a puddle of water is the shape that it is - I'd say its because that's how it best fits in the hole it's been given to fill

    • @hallamhal
      @hallamhal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Looked it up, turns out that's a Douglas Adams analogy too! I knew I'd heard it somewhere before

    • @dr.withoutthedegree3990
      @dr.withoutthedegree3990 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      So you stole it

    • @sacr3
      @sacr3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Why does water act the way it does? Why does it even exist? Just what the hell is energy?
      What the hell is this 3 dimensional space/time bubble? Why did it even begin? Where does it sit? How big and how deep does reality really go?
      Wouldn't it be easier to have absolutely nothing? Why something at all?
      We should have never even existed yet for some reason, we do.. why?
      And no, not simple answers like "cause we do", or "cause quantum fluctuations" because both of those aren't what's being asked.
      Quantum fluctuations? Why? Just how the hell did that appear and again, why something instead of nothing?
      My brain gets scrambled when I think about all of this not even existing, that would mean absolutely nothing exists to the point where nothing doesn't even exist.
      But this does, so there is a MUCH bigger system at play here that goes far far beyond our level of comprehension.
      We won't know why existence exists.
      Like trying to comprehend colors we can't see, a lady with an additional cone cell says she sees plurple, you'll never be able to imagine it until you actually see it.
      Our comprehension is limited to what we can experience. If we can't experience a different reality than this one, we can never truly comprehend just how insane existence is
      Nor could we ever, our bodies being built by the laws in this bubble, we can't leave

    • @exnihilodeux9735
      @exnihilodeux9735 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Busted

    • @Ketamineman
      @Ketamineman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@dr.withoutthedegree3990 he used it think of analogies as tools

  • @thanatoslives343
    @thanatoslives343 2 ปีที่แล้ว +167

    “This is rather as if you imagine a puddle waking up one morning and thinking, 'This is an interesting world I find myself in - an interesting hole I find myself in - fits me rather neatly, doesn't it? In fact it fits me staggeringly well, must have been made to have me in it!' This is such a powerful idea that as the sun rises in the sky and the air heats up and as, gradually, the puddle gets smaller and smaller, frantically hanging on to the notion that everything's going to be alright, because this world was meant to have him in it, was built to have him in it; so the moment he disappears catches him rather by surprise. I think this may be something we need to be on the watch out for.”
    ― Douglas Adams, The Salmon of Doubt

    • @radRadiolarian
      @radRadiolarian 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      way to send me into another existential crisis

    • @bartf656
      @bartf656 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      So I guess you know huh? I thought I was only one of the very few who knew. But it's now rather looking like we ate no longer the "very few" but now its just the "few". Anyway which event are you talking about because I know of 4 of them that are 100% coming the only difference is when........you talking about the one coming this decade before 2030 or you talking about the one 100,000,000 years from now?

    • @madirickard2660
      @madirickard2660 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @bart can you give more info please- what 2 events are we talking about here ?

    • @vincentrusso4332
      @vincentrusso4332 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I will take the book of Ecclesiastes of Douglass whoever..

    • @ProducerX21
      @ProducerX21 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@bartf656 da fuc

  • @JIMEHOFFER
    @JIMEHOFFER 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have been a student of astronomy and physics all my life and I can not begin to describe how much I appreciate these videos -- Thank you so much

  • @arbitraryarmorify
    @arbitraryarmorify 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    This is a beautiful way of putting forth one of the many ways our universe is utterly perplexing!

    • @Ikhlashasib10
      @Ikhlashasib10 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      who created the universe?

  • @danielm81
    @danielm81 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I've found a new fundamental constant called HoU Constant which is: 1 = 3
    This is how many times I have to watch every new episode until I'm satisfied. It's just so good!

    • @MrSdjwatson
      @MrSdjwatson 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      .....or even 1 to the power 3.....very very watchable!

  • @jasonkinzie8835
    @jasonkinzie8835 3 ปีที่แล้ว +332

    Philosopher here. Simulation theory isn't loved by me. It clearly just pushes the question of complexity back into another universe. Why is the simulator's universe so hospitable to life?

    • @martinreynolds5905
      @martinreynolds5905 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Because a simulators universe is the most perfect universe to provide these simulations.

    • @jasonkinzie8835
      @jasonkinzie8835 3 ปีที่แล้ว +85

      @@martinreynolds5905 Okay. But why use their perfect universe to explain our perfect universe? Occam's razor would suggest using only one such universe rather than two in order to explain complexity.

    • @pseudophp
      @pseudophp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +84

      @@jasonkinzie8835 Fully agreed, glad you brough that up. It appears to be a form of circular reasoning. The same questions we ask about our universe will still apply to the "original" universe. This hypothesis belongs to the realm of ideas. Same with the multiverses, it is an idea meant to suit the fine-tuning of our universe, but we cannot observe anything outside of our universe and cannot explain the Big Bang so, all for naught. By this logic, by their logic, God is just as plausible an idea, and if anything, God IS the simplest explanation.

    • @kevwatts
      @kevwatts 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      But that is just changing one god for another. now is a programer

    • @Aliasn433
      @Aliasn433 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Well, even though the universe where we currently reside in seems so large it isn’t endless. It had a start, it probably will end, its space probably also has a boundary (Although those are theories/ assumptions). but if we take the assumption that this universe is not entirely infinite in time and space, why shouldn’t there be a second one? Or a third? Or infinite other universes? What would be a plausible argument for that there is only one universe that started some time ago, created some space, and then vanishes into nothingness again? The only argument I ever hear is that we can only observe this universe. But is that a good argument? I cannot observe you directly, still I know (I’m assuming) that you’re existing bc you wrote a comment. I can not see other people’s thoughts or even my own but I still assume that they exist.
      I mean I get why some people might feel uncomfortable with this idea of “infinity” actually existing. It would mean that everything every bullshit you could imaging would exist in some random universe. It would mean there would be places with 5, 6 or even infinite dimensions. It would mean that there would be places where creatures like a Christian god exist. It would mean that there would be universes that would be just simulations in other universes. Anything would and could exist at some point in some time (or probably there would be universes with entirely different concepts then space and time, universes we couldn’t even imagine). It’s hard to wrap your head around this idea but I find it much more convincing then all the other proposals (one universe with or without god, a simulated universe inside another one)

  • @PolarChimes
    @PolarChimes ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is an interesting, thought provoking channel with well presented content. I just want to leave some of my thoughts.
    I think when we talk about why we are here, or how significant we are, or whether the universe is perfect or not, we enter philosophical territory, these are questions that can be looked at in many ways, they are something that can be informed by the current science, but not ultimately decided by it. It is also important to remember that reductionism is not our only option, and that each view has its own problems and merits.
    I personally think that the most significant things in the universe are some of the smallest, individual people we care about, life, things we enjoy doing, our feelings and the feelings of others, our power to think for ourselves and attempt solve the problems that matter to us, causes we believe in, notions such as love, empathy, fairness, justice, etc. These may also play a part answering the why are we here question for ourselves. I think the Earth is special because it is our only home, and a cradle of life. It does not need to be big or exceptional from a scientific standpoint to be important for us.
    We do not all need to agree on the same interpretations of observations all of the time, sometimes it is good to agree to disagree from a place of sincere respect. As the video mentions, some people believe in god, others think we are in a simulation. Some have no opinion at all/don't care to. All of these are fine. There are some people of faith in my life that are so kind and good in their actions, that it makes me think if I were to believe, it would be because of their example.
    Anyway thanks for reading, hope today's a good day for you.

    • @cyonu5675
      @cyonu5675 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      it's up to us to determine how and why we are here after all even if we're wrong it's the truth to us, we hold theories about quantum science as fact due to math but math is also something we came up with perhaps it means nothing even when able to prove phenomenon and what we believe to be the secrets of the universe

    • @patriot1303
      @patriot1303 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hmm. I think your thoughts attempt to bring together people of varying beliefs out of respect for the person which is a good standard to live by but notably a standard which can only come from God for without God the standard is simply a preference in how to live and others may logically prefer something different- Hitler certainly did. So I think while it is important to have respect for others in a live and let live fashion we should never sacrifice the search for truth using reason bolstered with science and philosophy and the application of the truth as we understand it. Peace

  • @j562gee0hdeewestsdegethemuLa
    @j562gee0hdeewestsdegethemuLa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    My favorite from this channel is the one about why time went forward but every video is a classic in my opinion

  • @Ozone280
    @Ozone280 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Perfection is a human concept that is logically unattainable, like infinity. The universe is what it is, if it was different then perhaps some other beings would be pondering the same questions we are and not us - but equally as futile. Only when you know everything that there is to know about the universe you can make a judgment as to its perfection.

    • @tonytg9099
      @tonytg9099 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Isn't everything we ponder about just a human concept, who says humans were meant to know some of these unanswerable questions.
      Will a dog ever know how to bake a cake?

    • @tonytg9099
      @tonytg9099 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jaymidavern2620 if the author has been abducted by a UFO ,that would be a good enough reason to steer well clear...

  • @archmad
    @archmad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    we give meaning, that's why we think it's perfect. but it's neither perfect or imperfect. it is just is.

    • @John_Doe742
      @John_Doe742 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It perfectly just is

    • @nothingbutlove4886
      @nothingbutlove4886 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This. Reasoning is an instict/skill created by humans/evolution to survive.

  • @jlwilder8436
    @jlwilder8436 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I think, like the Universe we live in, that episode was practically perfect! 😉
    Maybe it's because of the length of some of these shows that I was slow to check them out, but MAN I am glad I did!
    Great channel & content! 👍

  • @exMuteKid
    @exMuteKid 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Being alive on this earth is like finding yourself confined to, yet nonetheless free to roam within the pages of a famous book, somewhere on a shelf, in the library of babel. Thousands of books nearby in the same shelf may be full of gibberish, but who knows what masterpieces may lie 1000s of bookshelves away. In other words, Who are we to define order through the lense of a universe intent on creating chaos?

    • @To_The_Above
      @To_The_Above 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The book you are looking for is the quran

  • @oryagoda
    @oryagoda 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Great video!
    You have a great ability to get an idea to someone.
    I like how you built up the story and everything about it!
    Thank you

  • @jrockofages5413
    @jrockofages5413 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Fascinating concepts to ponder and build understanding. I am humbled as I listen, understanding basic concepts but each thought I grasp reveals infinitely more that are beyond my reach. I accept God as the ultimate answer of all that we perceive. Thank you.

  • @kabbzbergy
    @kabbzbergy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When I reflect on the knowledge from 3000 years ago, it becomes evident that people of that time believed they understood a lot. However, contemporary understanding reveals how limited their knowledge was regarding our universe or multiverse. Watching such videos makes me recognize that even in the present day, we may believe we know a great deal, but in reality, our understanding is quite limited.

  • @Astrnauted
    @Astrnauted 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Theoretically, time is a measurement of increase in entropy in the universe. I’m the beginning of our universe that we perceive and know; it started out as an infinitely small point that was certain and had by definition low entropy. Well as we move away from that so called event called the Big Bang we move closer to uncertainty and one could say universal entropy has increased. Mathematically it is perfect on a macro/micro level. But even the macro/micro level is governed by the quantum level. A level of uncertainty. A level of quantum uncertainty. Based off the fact we in our perceived current consciousness we can never be able to predict the future with certainty as we do not yet have enough bandwidth to tackle some of these formulas or harness some of these answers. We cannot know for sure everything there is about a quantum system. There is a fundamental limit, being the more precisely one knows a particles position, the less one can know about its momentum and vice versa. It is a dreadful thing to think, and a lot of scientists look this dreadfully rhetorical question the universe asks us all the time, “are you certain?” Which she echos behind with “The only thing to be certain about is the uncertainty the universe will forever gravitate too.

    • @PatrickAAllen
      @PatrickAAllen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Very well put. And I will let go on the previous comments and say I can't be thankful enough for the history of the universe series. It is been both mind-boggling and enlightening simultaneously. Much like life itself

    • @Astrnauted
      @Astrnauted 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PatrickAAllen theoretical consciousness and the universe is one of the most fascinating things to me. it can give so much power yet take so much power from an individual. truly a roller coaster quest of knowledge.

    • @abdirahmaansaid9699
      @abdirahmaansaid9699 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      what you wrote here is very interesting but if the universe is increasing in entropy and disorder how can there be after billions and billions of years since the universe began such amazing order in the universe from cells to atoms to human beings with consciousness all working together perfectly, also how could the universe have began with such order which seems like it was meant to be that way, If it was even a little off the universe we have today would have never existed
      i feel like the more you research these amazing things and concepts one should believe that there must be a creator, designer and maintainer of this universe even if you don't follow a specific religion.
      And I personally found all these answers to my questions in Islam.
      God bless

    • @Astrnauted
      @Astrnauted 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@abdirahmaansaid9699 I don’t agree with organized religion. If you read from the books before the Bible, Torah, Quran. Your understanding of religion shall change too. I believe in spirituality. Using cognitive dissonance to ascertain my own belief system. Organized religion I believe is the furthest one can be from their “creator” to instill any false prophet or kingdom within the kingdom of god is heretical.

    • @abdirahmaansaid9699
      @abdirahmaansaid9699 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Astrnauted do you believe in a creator though

  • @lsb2623
    @lsb2623 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    only in a perfect universe, can a bubblebutt exist.

  • @AppetiteMLBB
    @AppetiteMLBB 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This probably has nothing to do with this video but I “constantly” see the number 137 through out my day. It’s brought a lot of Curiosity to what this means and if it’s some kind of message. The fine structure constant.

  • @Pixelflame5826
    @Pixelflame5826 2 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Here's a thought. No matter how deep we look into things, we only come up with more questions.
    If we were made by a god, where did they come from, what dictates their existence.
    If we are in a simulation, what made the universe above ours possible.
    If we are in a multiverse, what rules dictate said multiverse, and why are the universes so similar.

    • @budapeste8206
      @budapeste8206 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Start with research "smart atheist understands God logic" on youtube. And come back here for more

    • @danielteacher4049
      @danielteacher4049 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Give me one example of any evidence for any of the thousands of gods created by humans.

    • @pillarmenn1936
      @pillarmenn1936 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@danielteacher4049 Dunno if this is much of an example but historians do believe that Jesus the person exists. Whether they had powers is up to you but there is a religious icon that's based off something in our reality. So out of the thousands of those religions and beliefs, at least 10s of then could have nuggets of truth to them.

    • @Pixelflame5826
      @Pixelflame5826 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      What the hell? I just made a comment saying that everything is inherently built on what we don't know. Suddenly everything went religious.

    • @user-my3vo5zp1r
      @user-my3vo5zp1r 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Pixelflame5826 intelligent design 🤷‍♂️

  • @Emkacafe99
    @Emkacafe99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    This video really comforts me. It let's me consider my daily life problems insignificant for a moment ❤️🦆💜

    • @bobspizza7444
      @bobspizza7444 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Maybe this is insignificant. Maybe are daily lives are the most significant thing in the entire universe. from the point of if there's no one to see the universe and appreciate it's glory. Then what's the point?

  • @dotnet97
    @dotnet97 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I wish you'd have also covered the explanation that the constants appear fine tuned because as the simulations have shown, most other combinations don't allow for complexity, and thus wouldn't allow us to exist to question the specific values of the constants in the first place.
    IMO it's the most compelling explanation. This covers why the constants have their specific values, leaving only the 'how' (which is covered by regular physics stuff).

    • @TheChzoronzon
      @TheChzoronzon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's the anthropic principle... and it's useless.
      In every single scenario (necesity, inteligent design, multiverse, evolutionary cosmology etc etc) the inhabitants of that universe can "apply" it.
      And any "explanation" that can be applied to EVERY scenario isn't an explanation, it's a void taulology

    • @co2_os
      @co2_os 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheChzoronzon can you explain that in simpler terms? Because I really don't see why the anthropic principle is useless.

    • @TheChzoronzon
      @TheChzoronzon 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@co2_os I just told you, in the most plain terms possible... I don't know how to make it even more simple
      I can repeat it again, adding some emphasis:
      "In every single different scenario possible (1º necesity, 2º inteligent design, 3º multiverse, 4º evolutionary cosmology 5ºetc etc) the inhabitants of that universe could reason that way (insert anthropic principle here)
      They can use that "explanation"
      And any "explanation" that can be applied to EVERY scenario possible, even if all of them are completely different at the core, isn't an explanation, it's just a hollow simpleness

  • @kasulefrancis23
    @kasulefrancis23 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    They most likely reason why the physics is just right for us to exist is because several universes most likely kept colliding and achieving stable states in a recurring manner and once a stable series of computational constants where in place it kept recurring even faster to more stable complex forms that are conscious as well.This would be an evitable equilibrium achieved by any progress in to a more complicated state.

    • @raularnela3654
      @raularnela3654 ปีที่แล้ว

      But in the theory of the multiverse, all the universes that are generated are independent of one another and would never collide or interact. There is no way for us to detect the existence of other universes. That’s why in this documentary he said the multiverse theory isn’t really a theory since there’s no evidence to back it up.

    • @kato_dsrdr
      @kato_dsrdr ปีที่แล้ว

      @@raularnela3654 Yes and fine tuning would still be needed for these universes to exist.

    • @mikey10
      @mikey10 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Entropy makes that impossible

  • @oldschoolman1444
    @oldschoolman1444 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    I find it pretty amazing how life took hold and evolved on our tiny planet. I hope that people will evolve from the belief systems that separate us and see the amazement of life.

    • @josuebrown6001
      @josuebrown6001 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I am Lucifers son I am here to destroy earth and take all human souls with me back to hell . I will rule earth and then watch it burn to ashes

    • @nothingbutlove4886
      @nothingbutlove4886 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@josuebrown6001 cool

    • @vectoralphaSec
      @vectoralphaSec 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@josuebrown6001 the do it already loser.

    • @heyitsagoodday4325
      @heyitsagoodday4325 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ooh so scary. You say you’ll watch the world burn to ashes but the only thing you see being turned to ashes is your soul in the lake of fire.

    • @scottydu81
      @scottydu81 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I cant imagine a word where cheetahs didn’t eat wildebeests.

  • @EpicSOB_
    @EpicSOB_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is my general take on the simulation hypothesis. All universal constants are the result of an equation designed to get a value which is needed to govern a specific aspect of baseline reality. Each aspect of reality has a constant associated with it and a rule set on how to get that value. All values which are used as constants are derived from a seed value, the seed value is the one true constant. Because the universe is infinite the seed value is also infinite but not a large infinity, probably a repeating decimal.

    • @hojagul
      @hojagul ปีที่แล้ว

      ..nothing created can be infinite ..if it has a beginning thnit has an end...Thats why God has no beginning or end. time and space still being created with the expansion of the universe..we all know here was no time or space before the big bang..The one who make the rules..., his existence from himself....timeless and spaceless ...he created us to show us what we are capable of...he knows but we don't...

  • @Rafaga777
    @Rafaga777 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    What a joy to watch. As always topnotch quality. Instant click and like. Thanks a lot for posting.

  • @anitamitchell3452
    @anitamitchell3452 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I just found this site the other day and I'm loving it. Sharing with everyone.

    • @artugert
      @artugert 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How did you just now found out about TH-cam? … Oh, you mean this channel?
      😆

  • @justicewillprevail1106
    @justicewillprevail1106 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    In other universe, the life there may be completely different from ours with a complete different set of laws that governs them. So just because we have these particular set of laws doesn’t mean it applies to all universe.

  • @obee1kanobee
    @obee1kanobee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Can't wait for new docs, I rewatch the old ones more than twice they're that good and informative plus the imaging is fantastic

    • @ninjabodyco
      @ninjabodyco 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      what if space is absense of light. so light is your entire life that's chopped into billions of pieces. it's fed directly into your eyes using Fibonacci (golden ratio) code to produce a countdown to death, which creates space in between the light. and when the countdown gets to death, you open your eyes to new life, so you're stuck inside a virtual reality infinite loop almost like you have a oculus headset on that's feeding light into your eyes that creates time that creates age that creates death that creates life in an infinite loop forever and forever in physical world, so you need to open your mind's eye and go inwards to go onwards. maybe.

  • @kantanlabs3859
    @kantanlabs3859 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I was afraid that the authors felt on the anthropocentred trap. Happily it is only marginally the case and this video is remarkably balanced. The universe is really a breathtaking wonder for the curious mind, this video highlitghs this point in a wonderful manner. Once again why a so reduced number of wievers ?
    If I may just higlight a common mistake introduced by Feynman enthousiasm to promote QED: The electromagnetic unification does only reduce the number of constants to one for wave propagation (and some localised QED extensions through a perturbation method he promoted), the quasi-static electric and magnetic fields still require two constants to be correctly described.

    • @alexojideagu
      @alexojideagu 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      An Anthropic principle of some kind is a valid argument. If we assume that the universe at an atomic level has no fixed form and is just potential energy, probability and time, with no solid reality, it's possible we could be "seeing" back in time through our instruments and eyes a version of a universe that should exist if we were to exist. We are manifesting our past universe out of an infinite possible number of potential universes. A Feedback loop of mutual creation with no beginning in time other than local time. This is a real hypothesis.

    • @rrashi4484
      @rrashi4484 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@alexojideagu interesting!

    • @wkb81
      @wkb81 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alexojideagu What is the name of this hypothesis? How can I google it?

    • @gregdemeterband
      @gregdemeterband 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Think of how Atoms form, then ask yourself, what building blocks are needed to create a Constant that our Laws of Physics, as we now know them, behave?
      What the elements need from the formation of the Stars?
      The interactions of each, Strong & Weak forces...etc...can they really be manipulated? Or, are they the way they are, because there is no other way they could even have been, or first existed?
      CERNN does NOT have the answers...It would be like trying to create something from nothing again...Where is the beginning of every Big Bang beginning?
      If nothing does exist, then why are we even here?
      Can we reverse the creation of Space itself? Like Time? (Time Travel Secrets). .. .. . .. . . .. . .. .. . ..
      According to Einstein, Space was even created at the Big Bang moments!
      Think of it in those terms...?
      The strong and weak forces are constants themselves...unless what???Unless they were manipulated by their constant when created, correct?
      That would be the only way they would be different in their formation and function Correct?
      How would they function at different levels of their equations? And/or interact with the other forces and elements...??? All would have to be equal in everything, for compatibility reasons; correct? So, START FROM THE BEGINNING of the Beginning...BEFORE the Big Bang; with all equations being equal at their beginnings...Is that even Possible? I do not think so...One can Dream, Yes; but in reality...We are here and any parallel Universe that could possibly be created differently, is NOT Possible! It cannot be done! We are here like true Miracles....No Other Way? Universe is even possible! Period! Boom! Sorry!
      Just think about the immense complexity involved to create our constant...
      Would it even be possible? Or are they, like I said, a constant of their own? Under a Law of Physics that is totally unbreakable? Like the Speed of Light?

  • @kasrapirahesh6938
    @kasrapirahesh6938 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I find that the greatest force driving me to continue living and exploring is the curiosity to understand more of this magnificent universe. And, to be honest I wouldn’t want to be immortal only and only if I could know more of this mystery.

    • @FordSierraIS
      @FordSierraIS ปีที่แล้ว +4

      immortality would prohibit you to experience death, and what comes after it - which is even more interesting than life itself to me

    • @jaxmc1912
      @jaxmc1912 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@FordSierraIS - and which has no proof of existing

    • @sunilkumaryadav2183
      @sunilkumaryadav2183 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@jaxmc1912 how to find proof of the death

    • @jaxmc1912
      @jaxmc1912 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sunilkumaryadav2183 "how to find proof of the death" you mean proof that death exists? well, according to science, memories and experiences ate stored and processed in the brain, so once the body stops functioning correctly and giving oxygen to the brain, braincells die and at some point, which we call neurological death, the damage is irreversible and your self is gone forever. i would go as far as to say that if all your memories and experiences were deleted from your brain its the same as if you died and a new person was born (although in this case the "new person" has the same genetics and is born already your age)

    • @To_The_Above
      @To_The_Above 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Islam answered what you are looking for for me

  • @christiebreen4307
    @christiebreen4307 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    I’m currently reading Stephens Hawking’s book “Brief Answers to Big Questions” and this documentary you have made is so complementary to it. The narration and animation is perfectly executed- and I listened intently all the way through (when most TH-cam videos struggle to capture my full attention!!). I really like seeing the faces behind names and the experiments (like the Henry Cavendish experiment- just insane for me to comprehend how he did that!). Thank you 🙏🏻 for making this. A thumbs up and a subscribe from me, this was a great way to start my Sunday morning! ☀️ ☀️ 🌏 ❤️

    • @eldin14
      @eldin14 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      "All things were created through Christ and for Christ. He ·was there before anything was made [is before all things], and all things ·continue [endure; or hold together] ·because of [or in] him". 1 Colossians 1:17
      Answered 2000 years ago: How things 'hold together', i.e. The Strong Force... 'a fundamental interaction of nature that acts between subatomic particles of matter. The strong force binds quarks together in clusters to make more-familiar subatomic particles, such as protons and neutrons. It also holds together the atomic nucleus and underlies interactions between all particles containing quarks.'
      Hawking knew nothing but what his puny mortal mind could devise, locked into it and his chair, as he was. No mind alive on earth is smarter than the Creator of all. Fools argue against God.

    • @vicenzor3625
      @vicenzor3625 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@eldin14 please keep your mythology to appropriate places for it.
      There's no room in this space for hubris with no evidence

    • @eldin14
      @eldin14 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@vicenzor3625 Yesterday's Blood Moon was your kinds 3 day warning. Oooooo.... Myths of eternal damnation suck when they come true! 😭🙏

    • @solideogloria5553
      @solideogloria5553 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vicenzor3625 check out Discovery institude, Reasons to believe and James tour.

    • @solideogloria5553
      @solideogloria5553 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eldin14 love the comment!! amen! i just wouldn't post it in a "in your face manner " without challenging atheists with evidence and reason. and most of times we should expect emotional reactions to scriptures that is not really necessary or helpful in any way. i propose we rather start with thought not emotion provoking conversations in hope that people who Christ loved and died for will start to think and search for truth because of a meaningful conversation.

  • @majorspade9629
    @majorspade9629 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I think we attribute perfection to it, because we think in design terms, because all things we ourselves to are designed by our minds. But the universe itself with all it's rules is just cause and effect.

  • @joz6683
    @joz6683 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I cannot recommend this channel highly enough. The narration, subjects and pacing are almost perfect.

  • @paulmyer7822
    @paulmyer7822 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I am a lay person but like many fascinated by existence. The one problem I have with this video are the many assumptions, one in particular concerning gravity. "If gravity was too strong it would be sucked into numerous black holes locking away all the atomic material needed for life". So I asked myself what would we be left with, a universe of just black holes? and if such was the case would we know the future development of the universe, maybe life could come to be in the black holes, we know virtually nothing about them, so we are left with just assumptions concerning what would/could be. Everything said is based upon what we currently know which gives us the reality we now know. I am sure there are endless possibilities of reality regardless of FSC. Why we exist, we may never know, after all in eternity if something can happen it will, hence us. I believe nothing will ever know everything, there will always be more questions that answers As said at the start I have no education in these matters other than an addictive curiosity about the whole business, so go easy on me.

    • @selihter
      @selihter 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You don't exist😃you're just an illusion of reality 🧞‍♂️

    • @TheC130navigator
      @TheC130navigator 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Brotha, the purpose of life is to experience it. How you experience it, well, that’s up to you.

    • @Randy_Flamethrower
      @Randy_Flamethrower 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you can just say layman it's fine

  • @edmundcowan9131
    @edmundcowan9131 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    One of best docuvideos I have ever seen. Congrats. For me it’s simple there is a supreme power. Call it a God if you will but just like the Bible, science tries to explain what we don’t know using what we think we know. I’ll call it the Great Keeper of Universal Energy.

  • @phoenix3992
    @phoenix3992 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    All of these are so, so well made. They never fail to fill me with a profound sense of awe.
    Thanks HotU

    • @OverRule1
      @OverRule1 ปีที่แล้ว

      What trips me up is the Universe looks similar a brain. Super sized black holes at the center of each galaxy could be how information gets passed as a collective to the whole

    • @phoenix3992
      @phoenix3992 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@OverRule1 I've considered that there may be a set of physics that pertains to the sub-quantum scale of the universe, and another that pertains to the super-filamental. And we cannot discern either because we exist in our layer between the two.
      So yeah, like black holes throughout the observable universe interact as the fundamental particles of a larger universe.

  • @johnhenandez8545
    @johnhenandez8545 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Everything in the world is perfect. Look at around, the flowers, your floor tiles, your body, and everything around is just RIGHT for it to just be. So why is it so hard to believe that what created us has to be different and can’t be perfect to hold us together. If it weren’t perfect, then we would burn or maybe freeze. So the real question should be, why do so many people fandom to believe that the world is just perfect??

    • @randylagoo7359
      @randylagoo7359 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They don't want to believe someone is above them and more powerful, they are followers of evil, forcing the masses to believe in their own beliefs, corrupting people and making stuff up.

  • @hajnalipo7209
    @hajnalipo7209 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Wow! This Channel is awesome. Thanks for sharing such a Quality content. It's interesting how knowing more and more about our universe rises more and more questions. Such a complexity of circumstances to fit together "by chance" just to aloud us to experience life ... and death. The biggest question is WHY. I'm not really sure if science could ever give an answer to this question because probably the answer is beyond matter. It must be a point in space and time where science of matter meets "science" beyond matter. Who knows...

  • @AndyRoidEU
    @AndyRoidEU 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    A perfect video.
    When taking into account the notion of the simulated universe, and then the regress, then there is a question: what even is REAL? Does "real" have any significance then? Is it just a human notion? As when we would exist in our made-up universe, are we real? I guess we are. So the beings who simulate us are more real? Etc.. Wonders.

  • @BuildingTimeFreedom
    @BuildingTimeFreedom 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    For you sci-fi fans out there, the book Manifold Time has a great take on this topic.

    • @gregdemeterband
      @gregdemeterband 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We would need to have the answers to the Alternate Theories of alternate Universe; where even time can be Stopped, or controlled and Space can be created, or reverse into nothing again...Imagine that! Ha! And you thought I didn't eat my Corn Flakes this Morning? ~ Ha! as well...beginning with the Big Bang beginning...What is needed to START THERE?!

    • @BuildingTimeFreedom
      @BuildingTimeFreedom 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gregdemeterband well that's why its science fiction. It's a fun theory to play mental games with though.

    • @eldin14
      @eldin14 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@BuildingTimeFreedom "All things were created through Christ and for Christ. He ·was there before anything was made [is before all things], and all things ·continue [endure; or hold together] ·because of [or in] him". 1 Colossians 1:17
      Answered 2000 years ago: How things 'hold together', i.e. The Strong Force... 'a fundamental interaction of nature that acts between subatomic particles of matter. The strong force binds quarks together in clusters to make more-familiar subatomic particles, such as protons and neutrons. It also holds together the atomic nucleus and underlies interactions between all particles containing quarks.'
      Hawking knew nothing but what his puny mortal mind could devise, locked into it and his chair, as he was. No mind alive on earth is smarter than the Creator of all. Fools argue against God.

    • @BuildingTimeFreedom
      @BuildingTimeFreedom 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eldin14 I'm not trying to argue against god, I'm just trying to figure out the language he (for lack of a better pronoun) left us to decipher. I'm so grateful it is such a hard problem because it will keep us busy for thousands of years, at least is has so far.

  • @jesussanzcamara1049
    @jesussanzcamara1049 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Extraordinary, excellent. The best documentaries about the Universe I have seen in many, many years. Congratulations.

  • @svchineeljunk-riggedschoon4038
    @svchineeljunk-riggedschoon4038 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    I don't necessarily believe in this theory, though I do have a point to make that is often missed - you don't have to simulate everything down to the plank or even atmoic scale, you only need to simulate it as realistically as needed to fool anyone that is observing that particular part of it at the time. That saves huge amounts of processing power.

    • @dairyqueue
      @dairyqueue 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      So render distance basically.

    • @alexscott7943
      @alexscott7943 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I don’t understand how people fail to grasp this concept. We use it in video games all the time. The simulation doesn’t need to render atoms or chemical bonds or even bacteria or small dust particles until we actively observe it. The processing power would drop so significantly I dare say that we could simulate something almost exactly like it in the near future.

    • @dragonlord1935
      @dragonlord1935 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@alexscott7943 Exactly. Here's a far scarier and trippier thought. What if this simulated "video game" world isn't an MMO? Maybe it has only a few players or heck, maybe even just ONE player. That dramatically decreases the processing power even further, to the point where it might even be achievable with our CURRENT level of tech if provided a massive budget and time. Aside from those few "real" players, the rest of the people in the world are literal NPCs ( I mean, think about it, we don't talk to every person we meet on the street and ask them about their past...who's to say they HAD a past to begin with? Maybe they were just spawned off screen for a walkby situation and then disappear into the ether once they've been "forgotten" from your mind). It gets really freaky and existential the more you think about it. Ultimately, it's just a fun thought experiment though, we haven't proven the existence of any simulation so it's just a random hypothesis supported by literally nothing. Just something to think and wonder about.

    • @chaotickreg7024
      @chaotickreg7024 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Culling and LODs

    • @cafesociety8525
      @cafesociety8525 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@dragonlord1935 you're likely to hurt yourself if you keep "thinking".

  • @MrJermson
    @MrJermson 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Breathtaking video. Absolutely wonderful. Thank you for the upload.

  • @KoNqueeFtador
    @KoNqueeFtador 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Loved the topic. You should follow up with a video of the problems with navigating through space if we ever were able to come up with tech. To actually travel it.

    • @jeffwads
      @jeffwads 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There is no tech to achieve FTL. It isn't possible even if given another billion years, etc. Just face reality and move on.

  • @Fb-gj5rn
    @Fb-gj5rn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I kinda liked the idea of the narrator saying that physics could just be code. I kinda support this because I recently thought of the progression of our universe as some type of advanced AI. One example I can think of is the evolution of biology on earth. It’s so curious to me that molecules came together to form life on our planet. And then slowly more complex life started to come up. Another example that I can think of is how galaxies are held together by a giant black hole in the center that has enough gravity to hold millions to billions of solar systems. I can give more examples but these are some that I think about when thinking that our reality/universe can be a simulation.

    • @charlesagain
      @charlesagain ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What is the mathematical probability of molecules by themselves generating organic life in an unguided process? Without a purpose or mission it somehow built the digestive system, knew the need for eyes in animals, and built eyes to process photons from light and designed the brain that interpretes what the eyes see? Ever thought of the magnitude of cosmic coincidence required for building the universe and fine tuning the first cell to building complex organisms? How an intelligent being like you can observe life and attribute it's origins and design to the very non-organic base matter used to build organic life baffles me.

  • @ArunodayTimes
    @ArunodayTimes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Beautifully written, great graphics and most of all thought behind it all...

    • @gregdemeterband
      @gregdemeterband 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I believe you may enjoy a Book written called, The Phoenix Fire Mystery by Silvia Cranston...
      That includes many quotations by the very same people who are mentioned in this video, to get inside the very minds of those great Physicists, as well as,
      evidence of the existence of our eternal Souls...👽

  • @RavenIsAnArtist
    @RavenIsAnArtist 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What is stuff made of? How can stuff exist and where did it come from? What is the universe expanding into? Is our universe just a part of something else? Are there other other universes out there asking the same questions? Would those other universes follow the same laws as ours? Would they know about us?

    • @maxhofmann6993
      @maxhofmann6993 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      we are just too feeble and small to ever understand. thats why Einstein went crazy

    • @riyaansheikh7470
      @riyaansheikh7470 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@maxhofmann6993 did Einstein really go crazy?

    • @TorMax9
      @TorMax9 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@riyaansheikh7470 - No, he didn't. He was brilliant in his 20's and just kind of petered out after his 30's. He was a kind and sensitive man until the end, perfectly sane.

  • @enilenis
    @enilenis 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I believe in the simulation theory, and tend to think about small particles as being numbers close to the decimal limit of the processor. Instances of matter and energy become a rounded fuzz, where the system approximates values in nearby spacial cells. Black holes are upper numeric limits, where numbers get cropped and are stored as a total sum, as oppose to individual bits. Also, the whole notion that we don't understand dark matter and dark energy, we can't predict their distribution in the other universes. We don't know how the dark components of equations would behave. Official conclusion rests on arbitrary assumptions. Things like Planck time are the CPU frequency. Entangled particles are hyperlinked positions to the same data cell, that becomes constant when accessed (wave function collapses). Lastly, knowing that wave functions exists up until it interacts with anything, we can say that the universe could only evolve towards interaction. Non-interacting system does not evolve, by definition. Meanwhile, the system that tries all possibilities, eventually collides with itself sufficient number of times to produce the experience of being here and now. The whole arrangement of matter in the universe is akin to a search engine that crunches in all directions, until it echoes back the structure. Until the whole light and gravitational web lenses on a tiny blue dot, where the universe begins to gaze out upon itself, contemplating how it all happened.

    • @np9119
      @np9119 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Absolutly correct. But then u have to expain how the universe where the simulation is run came to exist. It takes u down to an infinte layers which makes no sense.

    • @naturalLin
      @naturalLin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Regardless an intelligent agent exist if simulation theory is real

    • @davidregi7571
      @davidregi7571 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow.... 👍👍

    • @harrkev
      @harrkev 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you have any proof of the simulation theory? None exists, so clearly you are a person of great faith. What do you call your religion?

    • @josephjames4326
      @josephjames4326 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'll have a pint of what you just had.

  • @larrymenconi5287
    @larrymenconi5287 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I still feel there is a part of us that can not be defined or explained with mathematics, and that’s why we have the word miracle

  • @S-T-E-V-E
    @S-T-E-V-E 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The knife edge on which our personal existence balances has been extended to encompass our whole universe!

  • @richarderguiza7080
    @richarderguiza7080 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    i don't think its a matter of "how could this universe be so perfect?" but rather "how could life exist to observe the reality in any other universe?".

    • @zaceishen7974
      @zaceishen7974 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      How To Go To Heaven
      It is very simple to be saved and takes only a minute to explain. Please let me show you how to get to Heaven from the Bible, God's Word...
      Man is a Sinner in the Eyes of a Holy God.
      Isaiah 53:6, “All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.”Romans 3:19, “Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.”John 3:3, “Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.”Romans 3:10, “As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one.”Romans 3:23, “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.”
      There is a Price For Our Sin―Burning in Hell Forever.
      Romans 6:23, “For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.”Romans 5:12, “Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned.”2nd Thessalonians 1:8, “In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.”Revelation 20:15, "And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.”Revelation 21:8, “But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.”
      Jesus paid that price by dying on the cross and shedding His blood; Christ was buried and bodily rose again the third day!
      Romans 5:8, “But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.”John 3:16, “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”1st Timothy 1:15, “This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief.”1st Peter 1:18-19, “Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers; But with the precious blood of Christ...”1st Corinthians 15:1-4, “Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures.” This is the Gospel.
      By faith in Jesus Christ ALONE we are immediately saved.Galatians 3:26, “For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.”John 11:25, “Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live.”John 6:28-29, “Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God? Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.”Ephesians 2:8-9, “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.”John 14:6, “Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.”John 6:40, “And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.”Mark 1:15, “And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.”Acts 26:18, “To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.”Romans 10:13, “For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.”1st Corinthians 3:11, "For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ.”Galatians 3:26, “For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.”
      Salvation is NOT found in a religion or good works, but in a Person... The LORD JESUS CHRIST!
      Simply BELIEVE the Gospel and You Are Saved!

    • @abdirahmaansaid9699
      @abdirahmaansaid9699 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      yea there must be a creator logically if this universe was even a little off none of this would have happened
      but we humans are too arrogant to except our createdness and the fact that our creator is greater and beyond us.
      we dont wish to follow his laws but we follow man made laws, but the whole universe has to obey the set commands that they have(ie, laws of physics) or there would be corruption instead of order, so how could humans be any different.
      If God is truly there than we need to ask for his guidance.
      god bless

    • @anyoldthing
      @anyoldthing 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@abdirahmaansaid9699 What an evil bastard he must be then

  • @missepicmandy
    @missepicmandy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I am a game level designer and I thought for some time when developing the environment from nothing to real world... its the grid is basically infinite and without boundaries but at the same time you have limitations on how much you can create and build inside the editor. This makes me think nothing is real. The only thing that is missing is the ability to feel. There is also tools such as light and others objects you can place on the grid or inside.
    This is so strange. Its real but no real at the same time.

    • @naturalLin
      @naturalLin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If this reality is a simulation then a creator of some kind exists

    • @sparkshot
      @sparkshot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Computor code is wave-form energy. Probably similar to human thought which is also in some ways wave-form energy.
      Ancient words for Spirit and Soul etc in Hebrew & Greek all boil down to common denominators of meaning which are Air, Wind, Vapour etc.
      In other words, something which flows = Waves.
      We exist because YHUH Elohim spoke the worlds into existence & maintains them by the power of his Word. Words are vibrational wave-form energies.
      "In the beginning Elohim created the heavens and the earth."
      Elohim = God/s, Power/s
      Heavens = skies/dimensions.
      Earth = matter
      "Elohim is light"
      Photons of light seem to be conscious due to wave-particle duality.
      Light = entire Electromagnetic Wave Spectrum, not just visible light. Thus all these wave-forms are power and energy thus
      "In the beginning conscious Energies created the Skies, Dimensions, Matter and Earth."
      In essence we exist in the mind and words of YHUH the Creator.
      That's my view. Good init!

    • @anikanik8761
      @anikanik8761 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Simple answer is Allah created us

  • @Old_Cowboy_Magic
    @Old_Cowboy_Magic ปีที่แล้ว +11

    We are just the universe perceiving itself, and I think that’s beautiful.

    • @patriot1303
      @patriot1303 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Such a romantic lol 😉

    • @artugert
      @artugert 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We are each a PART of the universe observing a PART of the universe. Major difference. Not that the entire universe can’t observe itself, but we are not the entire universe.

    • @EcovacW-ns3xc
      @EcovacW-ns3xc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That means the universe is alive and conscious? Why would a alive universe not know about how it came to be?😊

  • @bazcuda
    @bazcuda 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    "...he [Planck] had unknowingly invented Quantum Mechanics."
    Isn't that always the way, though? I was trying to rewire a 3-pin plug the other day and inadvertently invented a time machine. It happens 🤷‍♂️

    • @Aliyahsarchive
      @Aliyahsarchive 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I believe it

    • @jamespoff8632
      @jamespoff8632 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Congratulations my friend good job hope you can explain in more detail last week!

  • @Artur_M.
    @Artur_M. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    "Part 1: Are you special?" Oh yeah, I needed a bit of an existential crisis with my breakfast.
    I'm joking of course. Great video!

  • @janelleakers1478
    @janelleakers1478 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love your narrative voice. You do a wonderful job

  • @erdnalickeroftoads2143
    @erdnalickeroftoads2143 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Max Planck when discovering the Planck Constant: "So ein Mist!"
    Everyone here: *indistinguishable screaming and cheering*

  • @Evie-bz1lr
    @Evie-bz1lr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wow. This channel deserves way more subscribers. Sublime content :)

  • @Hypercannon77
    @Hypercannon77 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I’m convinced this universe is by design, all the clues are there.

    • @gregdemeterband
      @gregdemeterband 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not Clues, but Facts...If you want, Sean, read my comment up top; it may answer your questions...
      Thanks for helping me realize this...Cool! Very Cool!

  • @fartsimpson8610
    @fartsimpson8610 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    "Why Is the Universe Perfect?"
    I highly recommend you read anything by Benoit Mandelbrot. The "perfection" we see is an illusion because we are hard-wired to ignore what he called "roughness."
    I would also add that in any discussion of perfection we need to discuss entropy. Yes, a flower looks perfect and could lead one to conclude that there is a fundamental order to the universe. But what that person ignores are the millions of tons of fusion atoms, disintegrating water, and CO2 that were destroyed to make this tiny piece of order.
    As Dark Matter and Dark Energy show us, the real rulers of the universe are behind the scenes, rather than what is obvious in front of us.

    • @azrielsmith3167
      @azrielsmith3167 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dark energy/matter are fictitious constructs devised to prop up a failed theory. They are not observed, but are assumed to exist in order to explain how matter is condensed and confined the way it is in the universe. Check out primer fields 1, 2, and 3 on TH-cam with respect to that. This aside, how would any perceived "roughness" negate the insane degree of complexity and order we find in the universe? We can argue about "perfect", but you would rule out intentionality and design in the universe based on the tendency of the universe to decay despite complex order and life existing in the face of that? It seems to follow logically that this arrangement would only make a stronger case that there is a force at work counterbalancing decay and disorganization.

    • @Raisin_Girl
      @Raisin_Girl 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ordo ab Chao 😉

    • @deusexaethera
      @deusexaethera 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@azrielsmith3167 : Dark matter does exist, but nobody knows what it actually is. We can see its effects in the bending of light around distant galaxies, which is _usually_ stronger than expected based on the computed mass of those galaxies. The mass of galaxies is pretty easy to compute, because almost all classical matter is hydrogen and helium, and almost all of it is glowing-hot or emitting radio waves due to radiation bombardment from nearby stars. in short, we can see almost all the classical matter in the universe. Yet some galaxies have much stronger gravity than they should, while others don't. So there's something else we can't see that's very heavy, and it's not evenly distributed.

    • @azrielsmith3167
      @azrielsmith3167 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@deusexaethera Right, thus you have illustrated my point. There are empirical observations which contradict what would be expected under the consensus theory of gravity. To explain this incongruence; rather than revisiting the theory, the notion of dark matter is developed. It has not been observed. You claim it's effects confirm it's existence, but such effects could just as easily be the result of other phenomena besides the notion of imperceivable matter.

    • @deusexaethera
      @deusexaethera 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@azrielsmith3167 : You misunderstand. The difference in observed gravity is not proportional to the amount of classical matter in each galaxy. Some galaxies are significantly heavier than predicted, while others are not. If it were the result of us not understanding gravity, then the inaccuracy would scale proportionally depending on the observed mass of each galaxy, but it doesn't. There is something else physically out there, not just an error in the math.

  • @israelemerson7788
    @israelemerson7788 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I really enjoy subjects on physics and mathematics, they are important tools to approximating our universe. The question on why we're so special certainly is a pondering one, but I wish the subject of purpose was implemented. Atheism rose from the French Revolution in 1789, as the religious leaders have not treated their people the way they should have. If you recall what they've been doing, it is grossly not reflecting the Bible, and because of their forceful intentions, the people revolted agianst them. New thinkers rose, proposing new theories in contrast to religious texts.
    To be honest, they've made firm theories that stand not on full reasoning, but refusal to Faith. And everyone that followed did the same. It is like someone who attemps to get into a walled garden by climbing it's vines instead of using the door. Don't become captive to the lofty philosophies of this world. The big conclusion to everything is not at a distant finish line, but is right in front of you all this time.

  • @Numba003
    @Numba003 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I am loving this series guys. Thank you so much for such beautiful and informative content.
    Stay well out there everybody, and God bless you friends. :)

  • @queeg9k
    @queeg9k 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wish I'd stumbled across this channel sooner - the production quality & clarity of communication are as good as I've seen!! V.interesting discussion but can't help thinking the perception of perfection when assessing the balance of the fundamental forces is predicated on the belief that the complexity required for life (& specifically human consciousness) is intended rather than just emergent.

  • @DiscipleOfHeavyMeta1
    @DiscipleOfHeavyMeta1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    If the Universe was perfect, I wouldn't have crippling depression and borderline alcoholism.

    • @drogfour2447
      @drogfour2447 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Consciousess is the problem

    • @LinusChadstrom
      @LinusChadstrom 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That is not the universe that is unperfect but your free will and your brain to not feel good and get addictions

    • @DiscipleOfHeavyMeta1
      @DiscipleOfHeavyMeta1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@LinusChadstrom Freewill is disproven.

    • @kkap895
      @kkap895 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@DiscipleOfHeavyMeta1 no its not. He contradicted himself hard in his own book

    • @swimhimself3101
      @swimhimself3101 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Right? Where's absolute alcoholism when you need it?

  • @alanarcher
    @alanarcher 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this is the best channel ever in the history of youtube. thank you so very much!

  • @mattsheezy5469
    @mattsheezy5469 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    My intuitive belief is that at some point during the universe’s expansion, physical laws will become unstable, causing all of creation to collapse back into a singularity.

    • @chickennuggetman2593
      @chickennuggetman2593 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm glad you shared, alot of people may have their own "little" theory that they are too shy or not confident to share.
      So you stepping up here and sharing makes me happy.
      Anyone who shares theirs will make me happy

    • @naturalLin
      @naturalLin 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If that’s the case the universe can’t expand and collapse indefinitely, eventually all energy will be used up

    • @funkworthrollin4959
      @funkworthrollin4959 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Great Crunch.

    • @kconrad5893
      @kconrad5893 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And your intuitive belief means shit. Thanks for sharing though.

  • @josephpaulson9495
    @josephpaulson9495 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    A potential multiverse makes sense because it gives a very real justification for why our universe exists, and why we as sentient beings exist in it. Every single constant of physics (or even an infinite other number of constants that don't even exist in our universe) could be changed by an amount in order to make an alternate universe. And so, there is a multiverse featuring an infinite combination of every possible universe that could ever exist, and by a random fluke our universe is the one we live in. It also makes sense that we just so happen that we live in a universe that can support life, because a universe that could not support life would simply not be able to birth us.

    • @harrkev
      @harrkev 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Nice religion that you have there. You worship universes. Do you have any proof, or do we just take it on faith?

    • @davidkulmaczewski4911
      @davidkulmaczewski4911 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@harrkev Exactly. I don't understand how positing an infinite number of theoretically unobservable universes as an explanation is any different than saying an infinite and unobservable "god" did it. How many multiverses can dance on the head of a pin, I wonder?

  • @gregnugent6195
    @gregnugent6195 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    "if you study science long enough and hard enough it will force you to believe in God" Lord Kelvin....

    • @FYMASMD
      @FYMASMD ปีที่แล้ว

      Bullshit

  • @emmonello7079
    @emmonello7079 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What about the idea that, instead of a multiverse, our own universe just recreated itself over and over again, with a big bang and eventual degradation into a state that created another big bang but with slightly different constants, until it just by chance created this one?

    • @dagmastr12
      @dagmastr12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree.....like a circle... Over and over again.

    • @bikesrcool_1958
      @bikesrcool_1958 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dagmastr12that sounds like a boring, depressing, loop of nihilism. Sorry I had to say it

    • @dagmastr12
      @dagmastr12 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bikesrcool_1958 what is your favorite theory?

  • @73N5H1
    @73N5H1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    In these hypothetical scenarios, they are changing a specific constant and then seeing what happens, but I think it's apparent to me that the constants are interconnected. Though we don't have a unifying theory. I don't thick a situation would arrive in the natural universe where a constant would have been different without all of the other constants changing as well. I think it's apparent that they are all interlinked.

    • @thek2despot426
      @thek2despot426 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Don't quote me on this, but I'm quite sure studies/simulations have been done confirming exactly this, that if you change one of the constants but leave all the others unchanged, you destroy the universe as we know it, but if you instead change many constants at once, a much wider array of possible universes are created, and many of which are more hospitable to organized complexity (like life) as we know it.

    • @eamonnmurphy5385
      @eamonnmurphy5385 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thek2despot426 I don't think so. I think they have tried to make a universe model that works for life apart from ours and have failed. They seem to have not come close!

    • @ExecutiveChefLance
      @ExecutiveChefLance 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@eamonnmurphy5385 That question is literally trying to understand the God if you believe in such a thing. We aren't even close to traveling to our nearest Neighboring Star let alone trying to predict the Mechanics of the Constants of varying Parallels Universes. Your talking Theoretical Theoretical Science here. If someone comes close in the next 500 Years I will be astonished honestly. If it is actually even possible to confirm such a thing.

    • @blakeb9964
      @blakeb9964 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly. And who knows what type of life could arise from all of those being changed.