@@jawhns3410 Kinda. As a language. I'd still prefeer speaking English to a Swede because 30% of the time, I'll have to ask "What?" or "Can you repeat" Swedes and Norwegians has alot less in common than most foreigners think. Some Swedish dialects, I can't understand at all.
WW2 would look a lot different… moscow probably couldnt rise to power and the Vikings probably had an strong navy and probably similar culture with the english so They might be allied making them have an insanse navy together
My brother tried to make my family watch it but it was too boring slow and dull. Like it if u want but personally i found no interest in the first episodes. It was just a guy who really really wanted to get on a boat and go west. I know vikings are portrayed unhistoricaly but i was expecting more typical viking troupes. I also found it hard to believe that historians know about his marriage life.
Dylan Edwards Directors on the show intentionally styled many parts to stand unrealistically, probably to add interest in certain characters or something. Regardless, Ragnar was more than likely a myth, so nothing is necessarily correct about him at all.
Huh. My brother said he was the first viking to settle in England. Oh well. I dont really care about the show but if you like it i aint stopping you. I just find it boring AF
Could barely read the labels, had to look closer to realize, oh, the Scandinavians are renaming all of Canada (my lovely nation). I didn't think those labels looked like Newfoundland and Labrador.
This Alternative Video makes the World History get changed alot. For example: If this happened, the end of the Middle Ages it will be at 1029 A.C not 1492 A.C or some wars doesn't exist. (Sorry for my bad English grammar.)
in the 18th century you have the entire great lakes region as part of the empire. I have a book series where they settle most of the eastern seaboard (as far south as the chesapeake bay). From Newfoundland, they went down the St. Lawrence River (called Miklafljót in my series), but they can't make it much further than modern day Quebec City because the water gets more turbulent and with niagara falls I don't see how aside from digging a giant ramp into the cliffs and walking their longships around the falls they would be able to reach the great lakes, which isn't rich in resources, there isn't even a large native population around there at that time. It is a very well done video, though. I like the graphics, especially the flags.
"ruled", lol, this dynasty was Russified in one generation, first of all. Second - Russians as a nation, and so Russia as a state are always Ugro-Finnic and Tatar-Turkic. Only the rulers were Slavs, the "Eurasian" peoples were imposed language and, above all, religion. Orthodox Christianity is strongly connected with old-Russian language, like Judaism is strongly connected with Hebrew language. Read about genetics of Russians. Even name of city "moscow" is not slavic, this is ugro-finnic name, original they call it "Moksel", there were peoples called there Mari El. Facts.
I am Russian. Let's talk about facts - nobody says that Slavonic comes from Finno-Ugric, learn to read with understanding, or better - learn English, or better - learn logical thinking. I am talking about the fact that the Slavs imposed the Slavonic language through Christianisation. Yeah Russians are geographical Europeans, what with that? I'm not talking about the Mongol invasion at all. The Tatar people inhabited the European part of Russia of the centuries before the Mongol invasion. Everything east of Minsk were peoples originating from Asia. Like finno-ugric peoples or Tatars. Do you know anything about history? Have you never heard of "Volga Bulgars"? Or Khazars? Or udmurtians? Or Mari people? Or Mordvins? The Russians arose as a mixture of many peoples, Slavs constitute a very small percentage in this mixture and every Russian historian will tell you that. Read some books - "The Land of Moksel or Moskovia" is good one.
You are claiming russians are finno ugric and tatarturkic with very little slav which does not even make sense. For all these people to speak a slavic language slavs must have been and always were the majority in their lands. You can't have a minority nation impose their language unto a larger group of people, history has shown it doesn't work that way. I know about history but I grew up in a western country and I admit we were taught very little about russia only a bit about mongol invasion of russia and napoleon invading it then. And then ofcourse ww1, ww2 and cold war. I tried finding info about tatars in russia but nothing said anything about them being there before mongol invasion. But then I find something about khazar khaganate which was a turkic empire this is probably what you meant. So ok I guess they were here before the mongols. But khazar khaganate never covered entire russia, only cacausus and southern russia later during its timespan. Also the people was diverse: *''The ruling stratum, like that of the later Činggisids within the Golden Horde, was a relatively small group that differed ethnically and linguistically from its subject peoples'' ''It has been estimated that from 25 to 28 distinct ethnic groups made up the population of the Khazar Qağanate, aside from the ethnic elite.'' ''Studies of the physical remains, such as skulls at Sarkel, have revealed a mixture of Slavic, other European, and a few Mongolian types''* This shows they were not a numerous people but they did rule over other people which outnumbered them. As I said history shows that if the rulers are minority they will eventually speak the language of the masses and it this case it was slavic because it was the common language. Same with the bulgars, franks, normans, goths etc.
@@WTFCDFoxy if Viking dominant over French,British,german Eastern Europe and also Portuguese Spain also stay Cordoba Then Srivijayan Will conquer Cholas and control Indian via south, Madagascar to Africa, Austria NZ later That's who rule the south
I once contemplated a scenario in which the Vikings had a successful settlement in the mid-latitude regions of the New World. With a viable economy the Vikings and their descendants would extend their influence along the St. Lawrence River, the Great Lakes, the Illinois River (it is a short ford through what is now Chicago) into the Mississippi Valley. How far south they get depends upon how much tolerance they have for hot, humid summers. But they are traders, and eventually their technology, institutions, ... and horses!...diffuse through the Americas. The Vikings, as avid traders. make contact with peoples of what is now Mexico. Meanwhile the Chinese and to a lesser extent the Koreans and Japanese follow the currents of the North Pacific to reach western North America. The site of San Francisco does not have a Chinatown; it is a Chinese city! They do adopt Christianity, as their cousins did in real life in Russia as the old pagan religion leaves much to be desired. By the time the peoples of the Western Mediterranean can reach the New World they face people of the New World capable of resisting anyone like Cortez or Pizarro.
pbrower2a1 I would wonder what would happen when the Vikings contacted the native Americans, maybe since they didn’t have matchlock guns by the 14th century it would be a fair fight between the two. Not that but since they are probably exposed to new sickness the continent would have lost maybe 80 % of its population until some of the immune natives soon depopulated and started to follow up with new modern European technology and techniques that would’ve lead to an interesting future for North America... right?
Alternate history: Vikings in Vinland begin trading with native Americans and hear of Great Plains and fertile land to the south and southwest. This begins the Norse rush to grab as much farmland as possible.
in English there are no other words for federation, but I'm sure that the Vikings wouldn't have called themselves a federation, it's rather what the late west called them
2:33 Oslo didn’t exist back then. It was first created by king Christian the fourth of DK during the renessance. Back then it was named christania. Later it then got the name Oslo
In our timeline, the original oslo burned down and then reconstructed by Christian. Oslo was founded in the mid 11 century by King Harald Haraade. DO some research.
This isn't alt history... This is a tinny red circle growing into a big red circle while years tick by. Three is no context/explanation at all ( the 2 sentences it the description don't justify anything )
This is more entertainment-oriented than informational, I have done several videos where I describe what happens but I prefer it this way and I think many others do too
I think they would have adopted it gradually between the 10th and 15th centuries, among great internal conflicts. But pockets of the old religion would have persisted until the 16th, 17th or perhaps even 19th centuries. I imagine the nazis would have attempted a great revival of it during the occupation and nordic neopaganism would be on the rise
The Vikings founded Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus; they ruled Normandy, conquered and ruled the British isles, and were excellent mercenaries for the Byzantines-- and much more. They colonized land and were great statesmen. The vikings were not primitive and simple peoples who only pillaged. It is very possible that in 1066 (among other possible scenarios), the Norwegians succeed and come to control England instead of William; in this scenario, they would have an easier time administering England than the Normans. They would also likely revisit North America and colonize quite quickly down to modern South Carolina, and eventually reach South America, bringing the potato to Europe far sooner. There would be little competition from other European powers, and by the time Spain and Portugal enter the picture, the Americas would be established Anglo-Scandinavian territories. The Nordic states are among the greatest in European history and have been sorely limited by their small population size.
Yes, i do. But i was speaking about Columbus comparing the vikings with him. It is correct that the Polinesians "discovered" America before the Europeans did. However they were not the first either. I was not speaking of whom to be the FIRST ones, just mentioning that vikings traveled to America before columbus. So basically, I was correcting the words of his ignorance.
If you are talking of evidence of Polynesians reaching South America as Thor Heyerdahl showed was possible... well, that discovery was superficial. There are apparent words of Polynesian origin in (I think) Quechua. North America? Even if California is closer to Hawaii than Hawaii is to westernmost Polynesia, the currents practically exclude such a discovery. Those currents more favor the peoples of northeast Asia, which explains why how the Russians could have a settlement at Fort Ross with the Spanish and Mexicans being unable to do anything about it.
The Vikings practically founded Russia. But they assimilated into the Slavic-speaking population because the Slavic-speaking women taught their children the predecessors of Russian, Belorussian, and Ukrainian instead of a Norse language. Sons and daughters often got names of Norse origin that now seem definitively Slavic (Vladimir, Sviatoslav, Igor, Mstislav) much as happened in Scotland and Ireland. Today we find such surnames as Macaulay, McCullough, and MacAuliffe, which are really mac-Olav. Viking names may survive but the kids learned Irish or Scots Gaelic. A region called Normandy in France was the "Land of the Norsemen". French-speaking people did not exterminate the Vikings; the sons and daughters learned early French. Children of seafaring people connect to their mothers in language because their fathers are away so much. The linguistic legacy of the Vikings is strongest in eastern England, where many words relating to shipping are of Norse origin and even the pronoun "they" is really Scandinavian. I am surprised that we have little evidence of Viking settlement in northern Germany, Holland, or Poland.
The vikings is get to in the lands slavic in 750 is colonizetion the lands slavic and they will call those lands of gardarik in english lands of tows the slavs and the rustic shamans afte term rus were appointed to the two sides and will govern gardarik in 862 turned king of novgorod rus
![[LOTR] The Complete History of Arda and Middle-earth](/img/n.gif)
This is definitely what would happen if Ragnar had not failed in his invasion of Northumbria.
Nice video ;)
You know that guy may be myth.
He didn't exist.
@@anirudh177 we don't know
@@anirudh177 there are scriptures of him.
@@theslavemotivator3571 Bruh he's legendary like Achilles or Krishna. Not a real historical character.
I am becoming addicted to your alternative scenarios.
imagine if people from ghana spoke swedish lol
watirMapping Today it's backwards.
In the video, it's Norwegian, not Swedish *TrIgGeReD*
”Hej, jag är ghana och jag pratar tydligen svenska nu” or ”Hello, i am ghana and i apperently speak swedish now.”
@@Erling01 lets be honest, swedish and norwegian are pretty much the sme
@@jawhns3410 Kinda. As a language. I'd still prefeer speaking English to a Swede because 30% of the time, I'll have to ask "What?" or "Can you repeat" Swedes and Norwegians has alot less in common than most foreigners think. Some Swedish dialects, I can't understand at all.
1:28 ESTONIA CAN FINALLY INTO NORDIC
DaGamer 100 FOR THE FIRST TIME IN NEVER11111
Lmao
Its a bit strange that finland gains independence while the more eastern parts doesnt.
I noticed the alternate histoy in the year 1940, i was like wtf is this
Hahaha
World war 2？Is it occupied by German Reigh？
Nazis?
Richard Rabinowitz yes
WW2 would look a lot different… moscow probably couldnt rise to power and the Vikings probably had an strong navy and probably similar culture with the english so They might be allied making them have an insanse navy together
Who else watched the Viking saga series about Ragnar Lodbrok ;)?
My brother tried to make my family watch it but it was too boring slow and dull. Like it if u want but personally i found no interest in the first episodes. It was just a guy who really really wanted to get on a boat and go west. I know vikings are portrayed unhistoricaly but i was expecting more typical viking troupes. I also found it hard to believe that historians know about his marriage life.
Dylan Edwards Directors on the show intentionally styled many parts to stand unrealistically, probably to add interest in certain characters or something. Regardless, Ragnar was more than likely a myth, so nothing is necessarily correct about him at all.
Huh. My brother said he was the first viking to settle in England. Oh well. I dont really care about the show but if you like it i aint stopping you. I just find it boring AF
Gay
@@bunceman4613 He isn't even real.
interesting story, I think it's this timeline Scandinavia does not have its great quality of life nowadays ..
As if that had anything to do with christianity...
Pleas view my alternative future😀
TheBlackHoleoftheInternet I think the second lol
@@arolemaprarath6615 that's simply untrue, north America hosted many civilizations and tribes before Colonialistion, it did indeed have a history.
I suppose that the Mexicas, Mayans, Totonacas, Chichimecas and other peoples do not count
Nidaros (where i live) is now kalled Trondheim. It changed 100 years ago
And if this happened the English language will be more nordic than it is now.
you see the sudden retreat from eastern europe in the mid 13th century and you just KNOW it was Genghis
His dead by that time
Time stamp?
NORSE EMPIRE,norse!
Ironside right
Hi
Man if this had happened, the Vikings would rule the west and the mongols would rule the east
Skagerrak flag looks great, quite modern
Great video
And meanwhile, the rest of the world does... *nothing*.
lol
2:04
Mongols : no..no..this white land is mine
Could barely read the labels, had to look closer to realize, oh, the Scandinavians are renaming all of Canada (my lovely nation). I didn't think those labels looked like Newfoundland and Labrador.
This Alternative Video makes the World History get changed alot. For example: If this happened, the end of the Middle Ages it will be at 1029 A.C not 1492 A.C or some wars doesn't exist. (Sorry for my bad English grammar.)
England: Chuckles, I'm in danger.
English be like:
Åi brøv, cöuld yü pæss me þat bô'ôl Ô' Wå'ĕr?
2:00 *1400s Viking Greenland colony flash backs*
1:33 large!
I'm Canadian and I realized it was alternate history in the year 1930.. I was like Humm we never got occupied by the Vikings wtf is this? lol
The dream of ragnar lothbrok
in the 18th century you have the entire great lakes region as part of the empire. I have a book series where they settle most of the eastern seaboard (as far south as the chesapeake bay). From Newfoundland, they went down the St. Lawrence River (called Miklafljót in my series), but they can't make it much further than modern day Quebec City because the water gets more turbulent and with niagara falls I don't see how aside from digging a giant ramp into the cliffs and walking their longships around the falls they would be able to reach the great lakes, which isn't rich in resources, there isn't even a large native population around there at that time. It is a very well done video, though. I like the graphics, especially the flags.
Fun Fact:- The Vikings were the first one to discover Australia and North America. But for some reason they aren't credited.
Is Russia still Slavic? Or are they Nordic?
Russia always is Ugro-Finnic
Ignore the guy above russia was always slavic but russia back then was ruled by the ruriks which were a nordic dynasty.
"ruled", lol, this dynasty was Russified in one generation, first of all.
Second - Russians as a nation, and so Russia as a state are always Ugro-Finnic and Tatar-Turkic.
Only the rulers were Slavs, the "Eurasian" peoples were imposed language and, above all, religion.
Orthodox Christianity is strongly connected with old-Russian language, like Judaism is strongly connected with Hebrew language. Read about genetics of Russians.
Even name of city "moscow" is not slavic, this is ugro-finnic name, original they call it "Moksel", there were peoples called there Mari El.
Facts.
I am Russian. Let's talk about facts - nobody says that Slavonic comes from Finno-Ugric, learn to read with understanding, or better - learn English, or better - learn logical thinking. I am talking about the fact that the Slavs imposed the Slavonic language through Christianisation.
Yeah Russians are geographical Europeans, what with that?
I'm not talking about the Mongol invasion at all. The Tatar people inhabited the European part of Russia of the centuries before the Mongol invasion. Everything east of Minsk were peoples originating from Asia. Like finno-ugric peoples or Tatars.
Do you know anything about history? Have you never heard of "Volga Bulgars"? Or Khazars? Or udmurtians? Or Mari people? Or Mordvins?
The Russians arose as a mixture of many peoples, Slavs constitute a very small percentage in this mixture and every Russian historian will tell you that.
Read some books - "The Land of Moksel or Moskovia" is good one.
You are claiming russians are finno ugric and tatarturkic with very little slav which does not even make sense. For all these people to speak a slavic language slavs must have been and always were the majority in their lands. You can't have a minority nation impose their language unto a larger group of people, history has shown it doesn't work that way.
I know about history but I grew up in a western country and I admit we were taught very little about russia only a bit about mongol invasion of russia and napoleon invading it then. And then ofcourse ww1, ww2 and cold war. I tried finding info about tatars in russia but nothing said anything about them being there before mongol invasion. But then I find something about khazar khaganate which was a turkic empire this is probably what you meant. So ok I guess they were here before the mongols. But khazar khaganate never covered entire russia, only cacausus and southern russia later during its timespan. Also the people was diverse:
*''The ruling stratum, like that of the later Činggisids within the Golden Horde, was a relatively small group that differed ethnically and linguistically from its subject peoples''
''It has been estimated that from 25 to 28 distinct ethnic groups made up the population of the Khazar Qağanate, aside from the ethnic elite.''
''Studies of the physical remains, such as skulls at Sarkel, have revealed a mixture of Slavic, other European, and a few Mongolian types''*
This shows they were not a numerous people but they did rule over other people which outnumbered them. As I said history shows that if the rulers are minority they will eventually speak the language of the masses and it this case it was slavic because it was the common language. Same with the bulgars, franks, normans, goths etc.
NiCE VIDEO!!!!!!
who watched the movie Vikings?🤔
If vikings are in the "North"...
Who are in the "South"?
WTF CD 〈[Foxy]〉 turks
Yeah... I was already thinking that there's some Antarctic vampires smuggling south americans
@@WTFCDFoxy if Viking dominant over French,British,german Eastern Europe and also Portuguese Spain also stay Cordoba
Then Srivijayan Will conquer Cholas and control Indian via south, Madagascar to Africa, Austria NZ later
That's who rule the south
When ur fucking around on the console in hoi4 and type in the wrong country tag
>annex GHA
Wow, so interesting, good job
Theres an error with the 650, it repeats itself
im find this vid at searching "sea territory alternate map"
What would be the official language?
Norse?
Maybe
Most likely since it started in the viking era
Great video. Where did you get that map?
The Blank Atlas :)
Vologda Mapping thank you!
They should have used Flex Tape
Where is no Viking colonies in Indonesia?
Indonesia : am I a joke to you
The true founder of the North America Continent.
This was pretty close from happening too
I once contemplated a scenario in which the Vikings had a successful settlement in the mid-latitude regions of the New World. With a viable economy the Vikings and their descendants would extend their influence along the St. Lawrence River, the Great Lakes, the Illinois River (it is a short ford through what is now Chicago) into the Mississippi Valley. How far south they get depends upon how much tolerance they have for hot, humid summers.
But they are traders, and eventually their technology, institutions, ... and horses!...diffuse through the Americas. The Vikings, as avid traders. make contact with peoples of what is now Mexico. Meanwhile the Chinese and to a lesser extent the Koreans and Japanese follow the currents of the North Pacific to reach western North America. The site of San Francisco does not have a Chinatown; it is a Chinese city!
They do adopt Christianity, as their cousins did in real life in Russia as the old pagan religion leaves much to be desired.
By the time the peoples of the Western Mediterranean can reach the New World they face people of the New World capable of resisting anyone like Cortez or Pizarro.
pbrower2a1 I would wonder what would happen when the Vikings contacted the native Americans, maybe since they didn’t have matchlock guns by the 14th century it would be a fair fight between the two. Not that but since they are probably exposed to new sickness the continent would have lost maybe 80 % of its population until some of the immune natives soon depopulated and started to follow up with new modern European technology and techniques that would’ve lead to an interesting future for North America... right?
Maybe a place in the multiverse this map is real. Wished i lived in this alternate country
Vikings loved ice and dark
good job
Alternate history: Vikings in Vinland begin trading with native Americans and hear of Great Plains and fertile land to the south and southwest. This begins the Norse rush to grab as much farmland as possible.
do you kidding me?antartica viking
Can someone tell me how you actually do this?
I keep on searching it up and I can't find it, someone tell me how please.
Oof okay, I might need some help on that.
Playing Wardruna in the background
2:04
Mongols : no..no..this white land is mine
I have better idea: Norse Empire conquers world and well all worship odin and wait for Ragnarok
Look when they discovered america, long before Columbus
Isn’t Nordic federation a bit to futuristic name for a country apexisting in the 800?
in English there are no other words for federation, but I'm sure that the Vikings wouldn't have called themselves a federation, it's rather what the late west called them
Great
perfect
(from finland)
2:33 Oslo didn’t exist back then. It was first created by king Christian the fourth of DK during the renessance. Back then it was named christania. Later it then got the name Oslo
The White TW Wolf Did you miss the part about ”Alternate” history?
In our timeline, the original oslo burned down and then reconstructed by Christian. Oslo was founded in the mid 11 century by King Harald Haraade. DO some research.
Actually, I think it was called Oslo before it was called Christiania, and was later renamed back to Oslo.
Hail Odin
Yes Norse Empire, Viking is a verb
sadly the viking empire never came
More!!!!!
Man, please send me this contour map to my mailbox
I live near skiringsal
This isn't alt history... This is a tinny red circle growing into a big red circle while years tick by. Three is no context/explanation at all ( the 2 sentences it the description don't justify anything )
This is more entertainment-oriented than informational, I have done several videos where I describe what happens but I prefer it this way and I think many others do too
Atp, just call it the Viking Reich smh
Fucking epic.
Did the norsemen/vikings lived way earlier in scandinavia
Eg bli i Norgesland til Eg dør
At what point have they adopted Christianity?
I ask myself the same
I think they would have adopted it gradually between the 10th and 15th centuries, among great internal conflicts. But pockets of the old religion would have persisted until the 16th, 17th or perhaps even 19th centuries. I imagine the nazis would have attempted a great revival of it during the occupation and nordic neopaganism would be on the rise
That would never happen as vikings were simple tribes and had not intentions to expand or create a civilized empire
the north sea empire happened
The Vikings founded Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus; they ruled Normandy, conquered and ruled the British isles, and were excellent mercenaries for the Byzantines-- and much more. They colonized land and were great statesmen. The vikings were not primitive and simple peoples who only pillaged. It is very possible that in 1066 (among other possible scenarios), the Norwegians succeed and come to control England instead of William; in this scenario, they would have an easier time administering England than the Normans. They would also likely revisit North America and colonize quite quickly down to modern South Carolina, and eventually reach South America, bringing the potato to Europe far sooner. There would be little competition from other European powers, and by the time Spain and Portugal enter the picture, the Americas would be established Anglo-Scandinavian territories.
The Nordic states are among the greatest in European history and have been sorely limited by their small population size.
Colombus?
Bulgeria 681??????😠
You mean Danish vikings
Vicking à Quebec??!!en 1608 et après??!! foutaise.
Plase mongol empire :) real barbarian :)
Harsh music ruined the entire video.
This is liar
Where is Sweeden kingdom?
*Norwegian kingdom*
Sweden is the bad part of Scandinavia
I wonder if they'd be Christian
Imagine them being not!
A crusade on a spot.
The Vikings found Christianity more attractive than their dreary Norse pagan religion. Nicer Heaven, and paradoxically less cause to fear Hell.
weird ass flag
when Turks arrive 2:05 :D
You meant the Mongols
Hilariously bad.
Well they are nothing compared to Christopher Columbus who discovered America XD
Don't you know that a Icelandic viking explored America 500 years before Columbus?
Asgeir iversen Don't you know the polinesians discovered America way way before?
Yes, i do. But i was speaking about Columbus comparing the vikings with him. It is correct that the Polinesians "discovered" America before the Europeans did. However they were not the first either. I was not speaking of whom to be the FIRST ones, just mentioning that vikings traveled to America before columbus. So basically, I was correcting the words of his ignorance.
If you are talking of evidence of Polynesians reaching South America as Thor Heyerdahl showed was possible... well, that discovery was superficial. There are apparent words of Polynesian origin in (I think) Quechua. North America? Even if California is closer to Hawaii than Hawaii is to westernmost Polynesia, the currents practically exclude such a discovery. Those currents more favor the peoples of northeast Asia, which explains why how the Russians could have a settlement at Fort Ross with the Spanish and Mexicans being unable to do anything about it.
So inaccurate.
Joey Davis it's called alternate history
Exist nordics in russian 750-882-1242
The Vikings practically founded Russia. But they assimilated into the Slavic-speaking population because the Slavic-speaking women taught their children the predecessors of Russian, Belorussian, and Ukrainian instead of a Norse language. Sons and daughters often got names of Norse origin that now seem definitively Slavic (Vladimir, Sviatoslav, Igor, Mstislav) much as happened in Scotland and Ireland. Today we find such surnames as Macaulay, McCullough, and MacAuliffe, which are really mac-Olav. Viking names may survive but the kids learned Irish or Scots Gaelic. A region called Normandy in France was the "Land of the Norsemen". French-speaking people did not exterminate the Vikings; the sons and daughters learned early French. Children of seafaring people connect to their mothers in language because their fathers are away so much.
The linguistic legacy of the Vikings is strongest in eastern England, where many words relating to shipping are of Norse origin and even the pronoun "they" is really Scandinavian.
I am surprised that we have little evidence of Viking settlement in northern Germany, Holland, or Poland.
Yes i know the history of russian
The vikings is get to in the lands slavic in 750 is colonizetion the lands slavic and they will call those lands of gardarik in english lands of tows the slavs and the rustic shamans afte term rus were appointed to the two sides and will govern gardarik in 862 turned king of novgorod rus
Lmao wrong
GLORY TO ARSTOTSKA
Fun Fact:- The Vikings were the first ones to discover Australia and North America. But for some reason they aren't credited.
Idiot