The companions of the Prophet didn't go to war literally right after he died... Islam has never had the history of violence is never a torn down temples and holy places from other cultures and it has always been super respectful and always nurtured the highest and most intelligent people. And Muhammad never forced himself on the widow of men that he had killed in battle... And I'm totally not being sarcastic at all.
Well Depends There is the false crusader narriative that was there to dehumanize muslims and picture them as savages And there is the actual history I cant be proud of the crusader narriative, because it is inherently fake yet sorrily it is still widespread
There are cultures that have to be honest about their history. You can't just change the narrative. Germany comes to mind (sorry Germany 😢). I'm British and we constantly hear about our part in the slave trade, despite us doing the most to end it.
The rashidun were, in fact, bloodthirsty lunatics (especially in Persia). All exept Imam Ali (as). They were selected (not elected) by a handful of people who had enough power and political means to do so. The prophet (as) never appointed anyone to select a Khalifa. Also, he was quite clear about who he wanted to succeed him (his cousin). And if you read about the actual unbiased historic events, you would know I'm right.
You are right in your head. Being selected by a group of people is by definition, an election. Perhaps go back to high school to learn the language properly. The Qur'an has a whole chapter called Shura which translates to Mutual Council. Our deen doesn't just come from Ali, it comes from every sahabi alongside the Prophet. Persians are just salty they got conquered by Umar and decide to hate on him being the reason why Persia practices Tawheed. If Ali was in Umar's position, he would've done the same thing.
May Allah reward you Sheikh, how wonder how come these ulema use these orientalist words and I really doubt their intentions, may Allah guide us All, I am not an Alim but still can differentiate and pointout these orientalist slanders, May Allah reward you.
Why he is so scared of the truth? Still defending characters like Mawiyah after so mang centuries 😂. We wouldn't be having this discussions if Ahlebait a.s were given the position they were entitled to.
Yet they're buried with the Prophet or in his City for 1400+ years. Really tells you who Allah honours. This comment will back to bite you on the day of judgement
![ลักพาตัว เอาลูกเอิร์นกลับมา...!! [เอิร์นไดเม่]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/f4NVKlZ5qkk/mqdefault.jpg)
May Allah azza wa jall reward you sheikh. They are like Zionist I dont trust them at all
That guy's either Shiah or I dunno man... We have Khalifahs who warned sternly against diluting milk... Who paid this guy bro? Tf
The companions of the Prophet didn't go to war literally right after he died...
Islam has never had the history of violence is never a torn down temples and holy places from other cultures and it has always been super respectful and always nurtured the highest and most intelligent people.
And Muhammad never forced himself on the widow of men that he had killed in battle...
And I'm totally not being sarcastic at all.
They are their history. The appellation fits perfectly
Masha Allah!
Does anyone know the name of the shaykh?
Shaykh Mehmet Usta
He is wrong when he said that the kids need to feel proud of their history. We can't be proud of such history.
Well
Depends
There is the false crusader narriative that was there to dehumanize muslims and picture them as savages
And there is the actual history
I cant be proud of the crusader narriative, because it is inherently fake yet sorrily it is still widespread
Lol be quiet.
There are cultures that have to be honest about their history. You can't just change the narrative. Germany comes to mind (sorry Germany 😢). I'm British and we constantly hear about our part in the slave trade, despite us doing the most to end it.
The rashidun were, in fact, bloodthirsty lunatics (especially in Persia). All exept Imam Ali (as). They were selected (not elected) by a handful of people who had enough power and political means to do so. The prophet (as) never appointed anyone to select a Khalifa. Also, he was quite clear about who he wanted to succeed him (his cousin). And if you read about the actual unbiased historic events, you would know I'm right.
Lol please go to sleep and stay a sleep.
You are right in your head. Being selected by a group of people is by definition, an election. Perhaps go back to high school to learn the language properly. The Qur'an has a whole chapter called Shura which translates to Mutual Council. Our deen doesn't just come from Ali, it comes from every sahabi alongside the Prophet. Persians are just salty they got conquered by Umar and decide to hate on him being the reason why Persia practices Tawheed. If Ali was in Umar's position, he would've done the same thing.
Peaceful Khilafah😮😮😮
May Allah reward you Sheikh, how wonder how come these ulema use these orientalist words and I really doubt their intentions, may Allah guide us All, I am not an Alim but still can differentiate and pointout these orientalist slanders, May Allah reward you.
Why he is so scared of the truth? Still defending characters like Mawiyah after so mang centuries 😂.
We wouldn't be having this discussions if Ahlebait a.s were given the position they were entitled to.
Give a solid proof they were entitled to rulers hip. Give an ayah or a mutawatir hadeeth
You can’t take a sniper of the shiekh words and the n say he did not explain it properly
Everyone understood the clip except those who see a snippet on this channel presenting it without any context
Exactly...
Munafiq spotted
First 3 were the worst
Yet they're buried with the Prophet or in his City for 1400+ years. Really tells you who Allah honours. This comment will back to bite you on the day of judgement
Mash Allah
Prioritise Theres better things to talk about
Prioritise, there are better videos to comment on. Why waste your time here?
Is he talking about wahabis being bloodthirsty?