InRange is entirely viewer supported: / inrangetv In this video we put the 7.5 FK BRNO through the InRange mud test. I do realize the bucket is more than 1 liter, I misspoke.
It's not a cheap handgun, but it's not absurdly expensive either. The original steel version was 7500 USD, but this is a newer polymer one, which is around 1500.
Most likely all hammerfires would fail in similiar way. Dirt between hammer and pin is going to be very much instant instant failure to fire. Striker fires are bit more sealed against dirt but nothing will save either of them when dirt gets into action and blocking full lockup.
I guess it would probably fail similarly. I don't think there's much mechanical difference between FK and CZ75 apart from the counteweight below the barrel.
@@Kesssuli Arex Rex Zero passed the MAC gauntlet challenge with flying colors, better than any striker-fired gun. I forget if any eventually came close though. Since this one wasn't even going into battery, striker-fired or hammer-fired doesn't seem relevant in this case, although it is definitely a factor in general for primer ignition.
@@xb0xisbetter Luger passed this test whitout any malfunctions. What does that tell about guns? Some guns are definelty more vulnerable against dirt by design but sometimes logic takes day off.
@@Kesssuli I'm aware. It doesn't tell me anything in particular, just like how this particular test has nothing to do with striker or hammer-fired primer ignition.
I suspect mud got into a small, sensitive place. Extractor perhaps. The gun would go into battery with no round, but not chamber a round. I hope Karl tells us the failure point when he finds it. As for the Luger, it may have done well in the mud test but it had to be the hardest gun to get clean afterwards (other than the X95).
Personally love my PSD, no regrets about purchasing. Now I know not to carry it in an Uncle Mike's holster while working near wheelbarrows full of mud. Can't say I'm all that surprised though. It's a tight gun. Lots of tiny little spaces where mud can get in but can't exit easily. I have to wonder too how much the counterweight comes into play here. That's a lot of mass, adding friction to that movement could impact everything.
Probably not remotely realistic anyways. I doubt anyone since the trench fighting warfare of WW1 have ever experienced getting this muddy in combat. Never in the middle east. Maybe some in Vietnam but even that is unlikely. It probably functions incredibly reliably in normal 'dusty' conditions which is about as much debris anyone is ever realistically going to get in this thing. These tests are almost jronic
It isn't about the simplicity it is about how well sealed the action is. The Luger uses a complex mechanism, but passed with flying colors because of its well-sealed design.
God damn so I want one of these. I love the idea of this pistol. Such a good idea and perfect amount of power for self defense. Probably be an awesome set up with a red dot to use with night vision going door to door
“I’m not taking it off because I don’t want to”. Why anyone questions this man is beyond me, I’m excited to see the optic issues that arise from dumping mud into shit.
I’d be curious to see what goes into cleaning these guns after you do this test. Even just as an addendum at the end “had to completely dissemble the gun and scrub each part” or “all it needed was a quick rinse and some oil”
Pretty sure he addressed his cleaning regime after a mud test in one of the videos. Which involved just spraying them down with a hose and drying them in the sun.
I own a PSD, and I have personally had issues with the gun going into battery with 7.5FK ammo, but have had no issues with 9mm, .40S&W, or 10mm outside of stovepipes on weak 9mm. I'd check this again on different ammo types, might have some different results. I know the FK ammo has had some serious quality issues, I've even had a round with a casing lip bent backwards underneath the bullet.
You need to get ahold of FK BRNO if that's the case, and have your ammunition exchanged (keep your brass!). They had issues primarily with a certain lot of S95.
I'd love to see this round in a 10 or 13 inch barreled PCC and see how it would perform compared to a M4. Something like a MP7 in this would be worthy of someone developing.
You should add what it took to get to remediation and a score so we can compare it to others. If it takes only a quick no tools field strip swab out chamber and two minutes to fix the gun, that's one thing. If it takes an hour and a major breakdown, that's really another.
I am curious if you had lowered the hammer before applying the mud if it would have made a difference in performance. I'm sure it wouldn't or if it did it might not by much. Just my observation.
I got a lovely firework display once I pressed the like button! Never seen that before. Maybe it’s to celebrate the 420k subs idk All I know is I love the mud test
i plan to get a ruger 57, when that happens. sometime next month i will sent that to you guys to mud test. if you haven't already. because my only concern with it, is that open slot ontop of the slide.
@@ALegitimateTH-camr I disagree, the ballistics and intent of the cartridge are completely different between 5.7FN and 7.5 FK. The primary purpose of 5.7 was to provide a low recoil pdw cartridge that was capable of piercing light body armor, while the purpose of 7.5 was to make a handgun cartridge that would generate muzzle energy equivalent to a light rifle or magnum revolver. When you compare the two ballistically, the 5.7 is basically a hotter .22 mag with a better ballistic coefficient while the 7.5 is basically a .30 carbine cartridge that can attain M1 carbine 18 inch barrel velocities from a 5 inch barrel, so it is optimized for pistols. 5.7 isn't since it was primarily designed to be used in P90s with 10 inch barrels.
Which would roughly make it an almost 4 liter bucket. 1 liter is basically two bottles of water, which that bucket can obviously hold more than two bottles of water.
Dumb thought; I'd be really curious to see this repeated with .40, since it has a 10mm barrel I wonder if the extra depth in the chamber would give the .40s some clearance to chamber when dirty.
I am gonna guess after he tries to cycle. The rounds were keeping that slide from seating the little necks look like they would do a great job of shoving a bit of crude in the chamber to keep it from getting the slide forward. Which is why it would cycle when not loaded.
Do you think it would make a difference (not specifically just for this gun) if you first took out the magazine and opened up the action before pouring on the bucket of water to possibly clear out or at least maybe dislodge some of the gunk inside the weapon? Or would be too much for cleaning for a mud test and you're trying to clean it off as minimally as possible?
Obligatory ReEeEEEeEEe!§!!§!!!§ YOU PUT YOUR FINGER IN FRONT OF THE MUZZLE REEEEEEE Someone had to lol. Thank you for another awesome test, Karl. Also thank you for saving the life of that poor plug at 3:08
Nope. Didn't have to. Could have unloaded it, plugged it, then loaded it again. That was laziness on his part. That being said, while I understand why gun safety is often taken to such religious levels, I don't think he was actually doing anything particularly dangerous there. When people just normally carry their pistols, the reality is that it's pointing at them frequently. If they are on the second (or higher) floor of a building, they might be muzzle sweeping other people as well in cases where the bullet would be capable of penetrating the floor. If they have a round in the chamber, it's no less dangerous than what he did. However, as an influential content creator it's his duty to promote safety and as such I think he should have taken the few extra seconds to not put his hand in front of the muzzle.
why should anyone freak out when karl put the plug in the barrel? the gun was on safe, he didn't touch the trigger. what's supposed to happen? sudden catastrophic failure in the trigger assembly which leads to the hammer dropping JUST as he's putting the plug in?
While I am totally fine with him taking an educated risk in putting his finger infront of the muzzle, it still violates one of the 4 rules of firearm safety. "Never point your firearm at anything you aren't willing to destroy." This is something that shouldn't be done, but the risk exists only to him so it's his risk to take.
that rule is to prevent people pointing guns and other people for fun or out of inattention. What he did wasn't an educated risk. The amount of bad luck he would've needed to damage his finger by unwanted discharge of the gun would constitute a miracle. It's actually less dangerous than someone running his finger over a knife edge or licking jam from his knife.
@@rikusschulze6249 And that's why it was an educated risk. Like carrying appendix. I think appendix carrying is the best CC method for me, but I won't lie to myself thinking I'm not breaking the rules of firearm safety. And while Karl can put his finger infront of a muzzle safely, many can't.
I have to ask, because fk has no information about the cartridge dimensions available. but is the 7.5 fk straight walled like the 5.7x28? I want to know if it's possible to make a big p90 chambered in 7.5 and can still have the same style straight horizontal magazine
The fatness of the cartridge makes it somewhat impractical for pccs i think. The p90 has thin bullets that stack neatly but these fat 7.5 bullets will take long magazines. Edit: i just thought about it more and like 10mm parent case aint that bad lol people make pccs chambered in 10mm all the time
In general, short-recoil tilting-barrel type pistols tend to do really poorly in the mud test. For all the advantages of the system, it doesn't seem to handle mud very well. With that in mind, it's probably more interesting to test pistols that use other systems, be they straight blowback, delayed blowback, blow-forwards, some non-tilting barrel short-recoil, or if there are any long-recoil or gas-operated pistols.
Glocks and other striker-fired guns seem to do better, if only because there are fewer places for mud to get into the action compared to an external hammer. The Desert Eagle is the only gas-operated pistol I can think of off-hand, but I'm sure there are more. I honestly just can't think of many instances where you might drop your pistol into thick mud like that; maybe if you were out in the field with it holstered and you _fell_ in the mud. But most places where I think of carrying a pistol (that isn't a large frame revolver) have paved streets and sidewalks and not much mud to speak of. Maybe this is short-sightedness on my part, I don't know
@@overlyobsolete2797 The Desert Eagle is gas operated, with the breech locked via rotating bolt (unless there have been _significant_ design changes on the newest model). The Alien is gas delayed.
@@overlyobsolete2797 No idea where you got that notion from. The Desert Eagle *is* gas operated. Mechanically it's like a Mini-14 with an AR bolt, in a pistol form factor.
This is cool and all, but we need some more bullpupalooza. I especially like reading all of the comments of people who wanted bad bullpups to be included and curb stomped, but I still need to decide between the MDR and Hellion too ... especially if DT actually releases a .300 Blackout MDRX Micron.
It seems like the most reliable pistols in the mud test are ones with no slide and with the rails inside the gun like the Luger and guns like this one and the CZ-75 with the slide inside the frame rails preform the worst. My theory is a well sealed machine pistol style fixed barrel closed bolt straight blowback pistol with a dust cover would preform the best. However it would most likely be a bad pistol. If the mud tests have shown us anything it is that you want tight tolerances on the outside so mud cannot get in and loose tolerances on the inside so that if it does get in the gun will work around it. That and big controls with lots of leverage so they don't get stuck.
The way he blew into the magazine reminded me of the old NES cartridge days
It's similar.
Me too I was rolling..
Should'a had a cuetip. That woulda' did it for sure!
It's a feature, not a bug. The pistol is helping you save money in a time of ammo price crisis.
ROFL
Too bad some have to buy it to figure it out first.
La crisis
@E Van Alas, I have neglected my duty
only if he recovers the ammo it spat out.
"I have a Holosun red dot on this. I'm not going to take it off for this mud test... because I don't want to." 😁👍
Lol his new plane carry 🤣
A moment of silence for all the unfired 7.5 ammo ejected during testing and now sitting in the dirt.
" for all my fallen brothers "
@@shivas3003 Gone but not forgotten
@@shivas3003 Never fired meme
I’m sure he picked it up.
I was like damn this test expensive lmao
Happy to finally see this absurdly expensive thing dunked in the traditional concrete mix.
It's not a cheap handgun, but it's not absurdly expensive either. The original steel version was 7500 USD, but this is a newer polymer one, which is around 1500.
1500 is not absurdly expensive for a new pistol platform built around a high power cartridge
@@jamesR1990 with a second barrel in the package.
As is tradition...
Dear lord the cost of that ammo scares me more than the momentary putting of his fingers in front of the muzzle.
interested at what the mode of failure actually is and would be interested in seeing if a CZ75 would fail the same way.
Most likely all hammerfires would fail in similiar way. Dirt between hammer and pin is going to be very much instant instant failure to fire. Striker fires are bit more sealed against dirt but nothing will save either of them when dirt gets into action and blocking full lockup.
I guess it would probably fail similarly. I don't think there's much mechanical difference between FK and CZ75 apart from the counteweight below the barrel.
@@Kesssuli Arex Rex Zero passed the MAC gauntlet challenge with flying colors, better than any striker-fired gun. I forget if any eventually came close though.
Since this one wasn't even going into battery, striker-fired or hammer-fired doesn't seem relevant in this case, although it is definitely a factor in general for primer ignition.
@@xb0xisbetter Luger passed this test whitout any malfunctions. What does that tell about guns? Some guns are definelty more vulnerable against dirt by design but sometimes logic takes day off.
@@Kesssuli I'm aware. It doesn't tell me anything in particular, just like how this particular test has nothing to do with striker or hammer-fired primer ignition.
Since I am more likely to own the Holosun than the FK BRNO, I still see this as a win.
That's the most rifle-sounding pistol I've ever heard on TH-cam. Sounds like an M14 with the short barrel on TH-cam.
Another win for Holosun. They really are making some great optics these days.
"I'm a professional... or something"
I don't know why it made me laugh but it's indicative of Karl's usual vibe
I would love to see a retest after a clean, just to see if this was a freak occurrence or if it consistently fails this way.
I suspect mud got into a small, sensitive place. Extractor perhaps. The gun would go into battery with no round, but not chamber a round. I hope Karl tells us the failure point when he finds it. As for the Luger, it may have done well in the mud test but it had to be the hardest gun to get clean afterwards (other than the X95).
It's a fatal flaw of hammer pistols, too much business exposed to the elements. May have had a different outcome if the hammer was down.
@@hudsonmeek6728 True. At least they don't have awful triggers like some Striker-Fired ones
Personally love my PSD, no regrets about purchasing. Now I know not to carry it in an Uncle Mike's holster while working near wheelbarrows full of mud.
Can't say I'm all that surprised though. It's a tight gun. Lots of tiny little spaces where mud can get in but can't exit easily. I have to wonder too how much the counterweight comes into play here. That's a lot of mass, adding friction to that movement could impact everything.
Probably not remotely realistic anyways. I doubt anyone since the trench fighting warfare of WW1 have ever experienced getting this muddy in combat. Never in the middle east. Maybe some in Vietnam but even that is unlikely. It probably functions incredibly reliably in normal 'dusty' conditions which is about as much debris anyone is ever realistically going to get in this thing. These tests are almost jronic
This pistol and cartridge is so cool
Всё нежное чувствительное.
Damn, it's usually hard to discern over a video's audio but I could tell that pistol has some presence when it fires.
Its still a damn cool poncho
I love how much fun you're having in this one Karl hahaha, the poor gun tried its best
You cannot put a price on Karl's giggles
So noted:
* FK: Be sure to carry in a fully enclosed holster to keep the elements out
* Holosun: Rocks!!
That was a lot of money ejected out of that pistol, trying to get it to chamber. 😀
Dude that was great 🤣
As always, InRange delivers.
We need to petition for the maxim 9 pistol!
This is why I like my Makarov pistols. Simplicity is king.
It isn't about the simplicity it is about how well sealed the action is. The Luger uses a complex mechanism, but passed with flying colors because of its well-sealed design.
I had a good chuckle at the "I'm a professional"
Love this channel
3:10 "Let's use a clean one." I do not know why, but I cannot stop laughing about how he dropped that magazine."
Watching fine gentlemen defile absolutely fine pistols while I drink my afternoon tea 🙂☕🥲
God damn so I want one of these. I love the idea of this pistol. Such a good idea and perfect amount of power for self defense. Probably be an awesome set up with a red dot to use with night vision going door to door
“I’m not taking it off because I don’t want to”. Why anyone questions this man is beyond me, I’m excited to see the optic issues that arise from dumping mud into shit.
I’d be curious to see what goes into cleaning these guns after you do this test. Even just as an addendum at the end “had to completely dissemble the gun and scrub each part” or “all it needed was a quick rinse and some oil”
Pretty sure he addressed his cleaning regime after a mud test in one of the videos. Which involved just spraying them down with a hose and drying them in the sun.
I own a PSD, and I have personally had issues with the gun going into battery with 7.5FK ammo, but have had no issues with 9mm, .40S&W, or 10mm outside of stovepipes on weak 9mm.
I'd check this again on different ammo types, might have some different results. I know the FK ammo has had some serious quality issues, I've even had a round with a casing lip bent backwards underneath the bullet.
You need to get ahold of FK BRNO if that's the case, and have your ammunition exchanged (keep your brass!). They had issues primarily with a certain lot of S95.
Yup I had serious problems. Very hot splitting the brass to missing the target all together.
I'd love to see this round in a 10 or 13 inch barreled PCC and see how it would perform compared to a M4. Something like a MP7 in this would be worthy of someone developing.
Wow the sound, Im not ready for that.
“Im a professional……or something” I love this guy! (In a strictly platonic parasocial context of course.)
right? he seems like a really cool gay, i mean gay, i mean gay, i mean gay, i mean-
@@SenorBigDong69 i did not
Thanks for the test. Can't wait for the next one.
You should add what it took to get to remediation and a score so we can compare it to others. If it takes only a quick no tools field strip swab out chamber and two minutes to fix the gun, that's one thing. If it takes an hour and a major breakdown, that's really another.
Frankly not surprised, this gun has always seemed very tightly toleranced and while that's great for accuracy it definitely impacts reliability.
Awesome as always thanks Karl!
One liter bucket? That looks like it holds more.
it’s an American litre ;)
@@IceWolfLoki Oooh, an imperial metric litre
I could sense your extreme trepidation regularly through out this 5 minute video.
content value 5/10, method of presentation 100/10 🤣🤣 boys in brno have butterflies in their bellies during this test 😅
Extractor wasn't snapping over the rim causing it to not going into battery.
Well that was quick!
Thank You for the revealing video.
Can you guys mud test the Walther PDP please?
Lol, I love the "I'm a professional, or something".
I am curious if you had lowered the hammer before applying the mud if it would have made a difference in performance. I'm sure it wouldn't or if it did it might not by much. Just my observation.
More of a 'Mud Quiz' than a Mud Test.
Karl I'm not sure I can trust the result of any future InRangeTV mud tests because of that flinch.
Agreed. You should not.
I got a lovely firework display once I pressed the like button! Never seen that before. Maybe it’s to celebrate the 420k subs idk
All I know is I love the mud test
I actually flinched when you dropped into the mud lol.
The noises the pistol makes when pulling the slide sounds exactly how well it works.
I have the same pistol and I’m struggling with the light primer strike problem around 20%
We need a USP and MP5 test.
i plan to get a ruger 57, when that happens. sometime next month i will sent that to you guys to mud test. if you haven't already. because my only concern with it, is that open slot ontop of the slide.
You're aware it's a completely different ammo though, right?
@@colbunkmust ya, but point is it's kinda the similar theme of cartridge. plus they haven't done a 5.7 pistol or even p90
@Brad S oh shit i didn't know.thanks man. that might hav saved me 100-150 dollar possibly. well if it's better.
@@ALegitimateTH-camr I disagree, the ballistics and intent of the cartridge are completely different between 5.7FN and 7.5 FK. The primary purpose of 5.7 was to provide a low recoil pdw cartridge that was capable of piercing light body armor, while the purpose of 7.5 was to make a handgun cartridge that would generate muzzle energy equivalent to a light rifle or magnum revolver. When you compare the two ballistically, the 5.7 is basically a hotter .22 mag with a better ballistic coefficient while the 7.5 is basically a .30 carbine cartridge that can attain M1 carbine 18 inch barrel velocities from a 5 inch barrel, so it is optimized for pistols. 5.7 isn't since it was primarily designed to be used in P90s with 10 inch barrels.
Pretty sure that's a gallon bucket. Unless I've been horribly confused about how big a liter is for my whole life!
yeah...
It's 'murican liters. Everything is bigger there.
@@somefool4625 Except the grasshoppers.
Which would roughly make it an almost 4 liter bucket. 1 liter is basically two bottles of water, which that bucket can obviously hold more than two bottles of water.
Ask officer Farva.
Karl bad man
I’d be down to see more handgun mud tests
Karl's giggles are the best haha
Is there a pistol that will pass the test with the hammer cocked and exposed to mud?
Dumb thought; I'd be really curious to see this repeated with .40, since it has a 10mm barrel I wonder if the extra depth in the chamber would give the .40s some clearance to chamber when dirty.
Me realizing that a $120 high point got 3 rounds off and this $1700 dollar fk brno couldnt get one😂
The Luger test still blows my mind.
So when cycling the slide, did the barrel get obstructed preventing a round from fully chambering?
Thank you.
Well, at least the pistol seems to be fantastic outside of mud tests. That 7.5mm round is still hard to look away from.
I am gonna guess after he tries to cycle. The rounds were keeping that slide from seating the little necks look like they would do a great job of shoving a bit of crude in the chamber to keep it from getting the slide forward. Which is why it would cycle when not loaded.
Do you think it would make a difference (not specifically just for this gun) if you first took out the magazine and opened up the action before pouring on the bucket of water to possibly clear out or at least maybe dislodge some of the gunk inside the weapon?
Or would be too much for cleaning for a mud test and you're trying to clean it off as minimally as possible?
To me, it is the mud inside the gun. Rinsing off the outside does do much to make the pistol function.
That had to be at least $10 of ammo that fell into the wheelbarrow as he was clearing stoppages 😅
Ballsy for you to just eject those rounds onto the ground lol
Good to see a mud test on the gun that we don't talk about.
Everyone commenting on the cost of rounds on the ground as if Karl didn't pick them up after the video...?
inevitably rounds are lost, and at $1.50 a round, that racks up
not that I mind, it is just kind of funny
Obligatory ReEeEEEeEEe!§!!§!!!§ YOU PUT YOUR FINGER IN FRONT OF THE MUZZLE REEEEEEE
Someone had to lol. Thank you for another awesome test, Karl. Also thank you for saving the life of that poor plug at 3:08
Nope. Didn't have to. Could have unloaded it, plugged it, then loaded it again. That was laziness on his part.
That being said, while I understand why gun safety is often taken to such religious levels, I don't think he was actually doing anything particularly dangerous there. When people just normally carry their pistols, the reality is that it's pointing at them frequently. If they are on the second (or higher) floor of a building, they might be muzzle sweeping other people as well in cases where the bullet would be capable of penetrating the floor. If they have a round in the chamber, it's no less dangerous than what he did.
However, as an influential content creator it's his duty to promote safety and as such I think he should have taken the few extra seconds to not put his hand in front of the muzzle.
>field pistol
>is MURDERIZED BY FIELD CONDITIONS
I'd still buy it.
Totally off topic, but i'd love to see what the 7.5 FK can do out of an SBR or SMG
why should anyone freak out when karl put the plug in the barrel? the gun was on safe, he didn't touch the trigger. what's supposed to happen? sudden catastrophic failure in the trigger assembly which leads to the hammer dropping JUST as he's putting the plug in?
While I am totally fine with him taking an educated risk in putting his finger infront of the muzzle, it still violates one of the 4 rules of firearm safety. "Never point your firearm at anything you aren't willing to destroy." This is something that shouldn't be done, but the risk exists only to him so it's his risk to take.
that rule is to prevent people pointing guns and other people for fun or out of inattention. What he did wasn't an educated risk. The amount of bad luck he would've needed to damage his finger by unwanted discharge of the gun would constitute a miracle.
It's actually less dangerous than someone running his finger over a knife edge or licking jam from his knife.
@@rikusschulze6249 And that's why it was an educated risk. Like carrying appendix. I think appendix carrying is the best CC method for me, but I won't lie to myself thinking I'm not breaking the rules of firearm safety. And while Karl can put his finger infront of a muzzle safely, many can't.
How’s the gun running now?
Like with all tests, Its still a fantastic gun ! Mud fucks everything up !
I have to ask, because fk has no information about the cartridge dimensions available. but is the 7.5 fk straight walled like the 5.7x28? I want to know if it's possible to make a big p90 chambered in 7.5 and can still have the same style straight horizontal magazine
It seems to be straight walled.
Love these
I don't care for the handgun but the 7.5 FK round would be really interesting in a PCC format.
It would be pretty nice for that, its just that you wouldn't be able to use it as such at matches
Isn't that just a P90?
@@magoshighlands4074 P90 is shooting much lighter 5.7 round. 7.5 Brno has crapton of velocity, but also pretty decent mass.
The fatness of the cartridge makes it somewhat impractical for pccs i think. The p90 has thin bullets that stack neatly but these fat 7.5 bullets will take long magazines.
Edit: i just thought about it more and like 10mm parent case aint that bad lol people make pccs chambered in 10mm all the time
7 62 tok :^)
Lol now I wanna see a Luger chambered in 7.5. Great test, I don't even have a microscopic point on how it should have been done differently.
I wonder how big a Luger would have to be to handle a 10mm cartridge or the 7.5 FK?
In general, short-recoil tilting-barrel type pistols tend to do really poorly in the mud test. For all the advantages of the system, it doesn't seem to handle mud very well.
With that in mind, it's probably more interesting to test pistols that use other systems, be they straight blowback, delayed blowback, blow-forwards, some non-tilting barrel short-recoil, or if there are any long-recoil or gas-operated pistols.
Don't the Desert Eagles use the AR-15's gas-injection system? Do those count as pistols?
Glocks and other striker-fired guns seem to do better, if only because there are fewer places for mud to get into the action compared to an external hammer. The Desert Eagle is the only gas-operated pistol I can think of off-hand, but I'm sure there are more. I honestly just can't think of many instances where you might drop your pistol into thick mud like that; maybe if you were out in the field with it holstered and you _fell_ in the mud. But most places where I think of carrying a pistol (that isn't a large frame revolver) have paved streets and sidewalks and not much mud to speak of.
Maybe this is short-sightedness on my part, I don't know
@@PhycoKrusk the desert eagle is gas delayed, not gas operated.
@@overlyobsolete2797 The Desert Eagle is gas operated, with the breech locked via rotating bolt (unless there have been _significant_ design changes on the newest model).
The Alien is gas delayed.
@@overlyobsolete2797 No idea where you got that notion from. The Desert Eagle *is* gas operated. Mechanically it's like a Mini-14 with an AR bolt, in a pistol form factor.
I was wondering, you guys did mud tests on all major powers ww2 combat rifles besides Italy. Are we going to get a carcano mud test at some point?
That thing is loud! I could tell it could hold a tokarev to shame with the first shot
I would love to see you mud test a 1895 Carcano.
That might actually be the worst result of any gun tested, including the Garand.
A WWI-Luger performs way better!
Let that sink in...
“POW” “POW” “POW” “POW”
“It is loud by the way” lmao, literally sounds like a stock movie sound for a rifle
This is cool and all, but we need some more bullpupalooza. I especially like reading all of the comments of people who wanted bad bullpups to be included and curb stomped, but I still need to decide between the MDR and Hellion too ... especially if DT actually releases a .300 Blackout MDRX Micron.
Aa Hydraulic Press Channel would say: he's a professional because he gets paid.
Any new history lessons coming our way?
When are you doing the BRNO stock/brace vid ?
You should do a practical test as well as your mud test
And now Karl has to find the $200 in ammo he ejected all over the place! 😆
It seems like the most reliable pistols in the mud test are ones with no slide and with the rails inside the gun like the Luger and guns like this one and the CZ-75 with the slide inside the frame rails preform the worst.
My theory is a well sealed machine pistol style fixed barrel closed bolt straight blowback pistol with a dust cover would preform the best. However it would most likely be a bad pistol.
If the mud tests have shown us anything it is that you want tight tolerances on the outside so mud cannot get in and loose tolerances on the inside so that if it does get in the gun will work around it. That and big controls with lots of leverage so they don't get stuck.
I gotta say it, in a mud test...
We don't talk about BRNO, no no no...🎶
What’s the MSRP again?
$1500-1750 for this PSD Model. The Field Pistol is the REAALLY expensive model.
I'd like to see a Makarov mud test
Damn. I wonder if they're going to see this and want to develop a striker fired variant?
Hey K :D I love the Mud Tests !! I realy love them !
and i love you. nohomo.