I think we can all agree, evil or not, Richard died bravely in a ferocious fight. On a side note, I'm directly related to his Barer Sir Thomas Thirlwal, who died beside Richard having had his legs cleaved clean off.
@@bbrockRailFan Two moral crimes attributed to Richard by Shakespeare ("The son of Clarence have I pent up close;/His daughter meanly have I match'd in marriage") where actually committed by Henry VII. Henry put George, Duke of Clarence's son in the Tower of London. He remained there for half his life until execution in 1499. Henry further had Clarence's daughter Margaret married to a relation of his mother's. Margaret's two uncles had been King of England and her father was, at one time, the heir to England, but she was married to a lowly squire. John Rous, a 15th Century chronicler, was happy to praise Richard to the skies while he had been king. When Henry became king, though, Rous began slandering the dead king's memory, including the claim that he had been two months in the womb (an allegation that appears in Shakespeare's play). Richard was the victim of Tudor propaganda. The Tudors' claim to the throne was only through a bastard lineage to King Edward III (and actually barred from the throne by Henry IV). Henry Tudor had no blood right to the throne and he had to justify his seizure of power by asserting that Richard had been a tyrant. In truth, Tudor created a sham court designed to fleece the nobility of money - simultaneously enriching the crown and oppressing the nobles. Richard, by contrast, ended the practice of extracting benevolences, which were basically forced loans that didn't need to be repaid.
@@t.c.thompson2359 Sir, you are TOTALLY mistaken. Her name is Philippa Langley, and she was the driving force that made the Richard III dig possible, and she is the one who was there when they found him in "parking spot" R. Please look up Ms. Philippa Langley, and you will learn a lot about her, and her magnificent force in this remarkable find. (I will not tell you his name, but it is a man who is the head of his "fan club." Thank you, and I hope you learn from this.
I find it kind of sad that here we are in the 21st century, and people are STILL imputing personality characteristics based on physical appearance. At the end she says "he doesn't LOOK like a tyrant at all" and the guy beside her says "no, he's a bonny lad". Richard was no angel for sure, but back in his day his scoliosis was used as a confirmatory sign that he had deep evil inside him. They did that a lot in those days, to both men and women. And here we are with all our science in our century, doing it still.
To see Philippa Langley so touched, so overwhelmed, so reverential, so almost in adoration is absolutely wonderful. It is as if she is actually encountering King Richard III for the first time...after she had worked so long and hard to discover, and uncover him. Her response is totally fitting for all of her herculean effort. Philippa Langley has reached her reward, and it is fitting for her as a job well done. Doctor George Whitehead
I wonder how much of the reconstruction was influenced by what is known about him. If his face was reconstructed by someone who was completely blind to the fact it was King Ricky's skull, would it still look the same?
No. Facial reconstruction relies on knowledge of culture, diet and lifestyl, paintings and descriptions from the era to make the face more accurate. It will mostly be similar, but not the same
I can’t help but think that how it turns out is indeed influenced by the perceptions of the people doing the reconstruction, regardless of what they say. For example, if there is a facial reconstruction group in Japan, and even if they used the same depth marker protocol and rules of reconstruction based on surmised ethnicity of the skull, I am certain that a Japanese group would come up with a face that looks quite different from their English counterparts. I would like to have the skull of a famous person scanned and cast in a skull replica mold and sent to various reconstruction labs across the globe and see how many of them come up with the face of the famous person that’s recognizable. I would bet against any of them coming up with a face that matches the famous persons.
She (the reconstructor) said precisely that in the documentary, about how insecure she was that maybe she influenced the end product, but as Moji Green said, she also reitereted that she did the process again and again, making sure she followed known anatomical standards to make an unbiased product.
That female descendant resembles him. I can see the startling resemblance. The man however, I don't see resemblance.. I don't know if Richard III actually had children, so when it comes to mitochondrial dna, I guess the female would have the resemblance traits.
None of them are related to him directly, and even if they were, its been too many generations to show. Theyre from the Richard III Society, who got the search going. Theyre only related like every other person with British blood in their veins is - se Dr. Teri Kings video on that. Richard had 1 legitimate child, who sadly died age 10 in 1484. He was known to have only 2 illegitimate children from b4 his marriage, both died without children of their own. Again, see Dr. Teri Kings video on the DNA match. Basically, they found 2 maternal lines from his sister to match the mitochondrial DNA. For the Y-chro they had to go back to Edward III and find paternal lines through John of Gaunt.
Richard III had 1 male child but he didn't survive to become an adult. He (child) died of an illness. The matrilineal line is traced from Richard's sister, who married & had children.
My DNA says my index finger should be longer than my ring finger.... it is not. Both are the same size. My DNA also says my hair should be very dark and my eyes blue, but my hair is medium ash brown, and my eyes are green hazel. Just because your DNA says you should be one thing doesn't mean you are. It all comes down to how strong of weak your genes are. In my case my father's darker hair gene's were not as powerful as my mother's blond ones.
@@allies7184 That's very interesting... Isn't some of it about recessive genes? In your case, for example, does your appearance mean your father actually has family (a recent ancestor) with genes for your colour of hair and eyes? My dad was black-haired and brown-eyed, my mother white blonde darkening to dark blonde, and blue-eyed. Each had one red-haired, blue-eyed parent. I am red-haired and blue-eyed. Just thought that info might help explain my perspective on the gene thing.
Umm, maybe he got brown after the puberty? Because my sister hair is getting black too after puberty, and i got lighter eyes and lighter hair after 18? Just probably because his paintings, all with black hair
Richard 3 is a king from the Plantagenêt dynasty so with french roots (house of Anjou). The Plantagenêt ruled England for centuries, especially during the 100 years war. Honestly he looks like the french actor Jean Dujardin🤣
Ooo so that means he was half french 🇫🇷🇫🇷 And a fun fact is his sweet wife Anne nevile is 100 percent English and his sister in law Queen Elizabeth woodvile is also 100 percent English 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
A good looking bloke to be sure.I am glad has has been given a decent burial. As he was Catholic he should have been given a Requiem Mass.I will offer up prayers for him should he be in purgatory.
Am I the only one that sees Terry Jones face on the 3D render near the beginning of this, as well as the thumbnail? That's why I'm here. I thought Richard III was a bit he was doing back then, like a "Bad King gag"
History appears to show all these ancient kings were alternating cold and hot blooded; depending on the situation to keep their royal asses on the throne. Am I wrong?
DNA testing showed, that with very high probability he had blond hair and blue eyes. So I found it a bit weird, that the reconstruction was given a wig of very dark brown hair exactly as in the portrait, which wasnt even painting until a couple of decades after his death and differs from contemporary descriptions of him. Im aware of Dr. Wilkinson's excellent work, but I cant help but wonder, if she was too influenced by knowing, who he was and the famous painting, coz the reconstruction looks like a bust made to copy the painting. Tho ofc the wig does a lot, and again I dont understand, why a wig in a wrong color was chosen, except if she was going by the painting.
Ive seen a couple of documentaries, where Dr. Wilkinson did face reconstructions. She explained, that nose, ears, lips etc are educated guesses, as there are little to no bones to work from. So she guesses from her experience, what fits with the rest of the face, whats most likely. In this case, tho, I think, she was very much influenced by knowing, whose face she was reconstructing, and knowing the famous painting, as the reconstruction is the spitting image of a painting, that has provable errors in it (compared to contemporary descriptions of him) and was painted decades after his death by some1, who never met him. Including giving the reconstruction a wig exactly like the painting in contradiction with the DNA results.
Usually she does really good work. But I think, this reconstruction looks like a copy of the famous painting. I think, she was influenced by knowing, whose face she was reconstructing, and knowing that famous painting. How else would it look so alike, when the painting was made decades after Richards death by a painter, who never met him, and looking different from contemporary descriptions of him as well as contradicted by the DNA results?
Plantagenet was their last name just like Henry VIII’s name is Henry Tudor. His name is Richard Plantagenet. The Plantagenets are from a French royal family.
After waiting nearly 5 minutes to see what King Dick's face looked like, we get a GLIMPSE of it for about 5 seconds!!! Very, very disappointed! At the very least, we could have been given a long, searching look for ourselves!
They obviously tried to make him as appealing as possible. No way in hell the deformed hunchback king looked like that. He probably more closely resembled that creep who sold Sparta to Xerxes in that 300 movie. Be realistic people.
they did a whole investigation into his spinal problem and it wasn't even that bad he could stand straight up the only problem he would of had was breathing in armor for long periods of time which is probably how he died after being taken off his horse in battle he wouldn't of been a hunch back because they found a volunteer with the same spinal problem he had they even trained him to fight on horseback and made him a whole suit of armor to wear whatever stories you've read there bullshit how about you actually research more into this documentary before talking shit!
Scoliosis and hunchback are 2 different conditions. And clearly he was fully functionable as a warrior, even the Tudors admitted, he fought well and died heroicly, even as they did everything to vilify and smear him. The deformed hunchback is Shakespeares invention, writing for the Tudor queen Elizabeth, another commissioned work of propaganda.
Where dose one start, well, this is what I know , that person is not King Richard because the Kings remains are under the castle Where they have been sense the day he passed on, the body that was recovered was Henry the eighth, Henry's family tree was found decades ago in the archives and still is there today, believe me or don't . G
How do you know what he looked like? Portraits were over-painted to distort his appearance. Subsequent accounts weren't reliable for political reasons. They've made this from his freaking skull - I think this is as close as we're going to get... ...nonetheless, you may have a point: I'm fairly sure that's actually Noel Fielding ;-)
Oh my gosh it's Lord farquad
😂
😂😂😂
🤣
😅😅lol
😂 😂 😂 😂 😂
I think we can all agree, evil or not, Richard died bravely in a ferocious fight. On a side note, I'm directly related to his Barer Sir Thomas Thirlwal, who died beside Richard having had his legs cleaved clean off.
He was a piece of shit but so was Henry VII. Most of the royals where utter assholes.
@@bbrockRailFan Two moral crimes attributed to Richard by Shakespeare ("The son of Clarence have I pent up close;/His daughter meanly have I match'd in marriage") where actually committed by Henry VII. Henry put George, Duke of Clarence's son in the Tower of London. He remained there for half his life until execution in 1499. Henry further had Clarence's daughter Margaret married to a relation of his mother's. Margaret's two uncles had been King of England and her father was, at one time, the heir to England, but she was married to a lowly squire. John Rous, a 15th Century chronicler, was happy to praise Richard to the skies while he had been king. When Henry became king, though, Rous began slandering the dead king's memory, including the claim that he had been two months in the womb (an allegation that appears in Shakespeare's play). Richard was the victim of Tudor propaganda. The Tudors' claim to the throne was only through a bastard lineage to King Edward III (and actually barred from the throne by Henry IV). Henry Tudor had no blood right to the throne and he had to justify his seizure of power by asserting that Richard had been a tyrant. In truth, Tudor created a sham court designed to fleece the nobility of money - simultaneously enriching the crown and oppressing the nobles. Richard, by contrast, ended the practice of extracting benevolences, which were basically forced loans that didn't need to be repaid.
@@bbrockRailFan YOU ARE a great bit of shit bloke.
@@bbrockRailFan I would add 'Enery the VIII.
@@LesterMoore *Henry
The women at the end of the program so emotional at seeing the head was the one who found the skeleton.
No she didn't. She is just the head of his fan club.
@@t.c.thompson2359 Is that a joke? I saw her digging the skeleton out on a video.
@@t.c.thompson2359 Sir, you are TOTALLY mistaken. Her name is Philippa Langley, and she was the driving force that made the Richard III dig possible, and she is the one who was there when they found him in "parking spot" R. Please look up Ms. Philippa Langley, and you will learn a lot about her, and her magnificent force in this remarkable find. (I will not tell you his name, but it is a man who is the head of his "fan club." Thank you, and I hope you learn from this.
She was moist for that reconstruction, thats for sure
She is like entranced like the dude is alive..
I find it kind of sad that here we are in the 21st century, and people are STILL imputing personality characteristics based on physical appearance. At the end she says "he doesn't LOOK like a tyrant at all" and the guy beside her says "no, he's a bonny lad". Richard was no angel for sure, but back in his day his scoliosis was used as a confirmatory sign that he had deep evil inside him. They did that a lot in those days, to both men and women. And here we are with all our science in our century, doing it still.
"Doesnt look like the face of a tyrant" that's cause he wasn't one lol
Richard III
The King In The Car Park.
Now I know where Lord Farquard inspired from.
💀
To see Philippa Langley so touched, so overwhelmed, so reverential, so almost in adoration is absolutely wonderful. It is as if she is actually encountering King Richard III for the first time...after she had worked so long and hard to discover, and uncover him. Her response is totally fitting for all of her herculean effort. Philippa Langley has reached her reward, and it is fitting for her as a job well done. Doctor George Whitehead
My granny princess Marianna Cottone she descents from Ancients kings of Wessex and from Charlemagne but also king Henry Il of England
I wonder how much of the reconstruction was influenced by what is known about him. If his face was reconstructed by someone who was completely blind to the fact it was King Ricky's skull, would it still look the same?
No. Facial reconstruction relies on knowledge of culture, diet and lifestyl, paintings and descriptions from the era to make the face more accurate. It will mostly be similar, but not the same
I can’t help but think that how it turns out is indeed influenced by the perceptions of the people doing the reconstruction, regardless of what they say. For example, if there is a facial reconstruction group in Japan, and even if they used the same depth marker protocol and rules of reconstruction based on surmised ethnicity of the skull, I am certain that a Japanese group would come up with a face that looks quite different from their English counterparts. I would like to have the skull of a famous person scanned and cast in a skull replica mold and sent to various reconstruction labs across the globe and see how many of them come up with the face of the famous person that’s recognizable. I would bet against any of them coming up with a face that matches the famous persons.
@Stephanie Flynn It's Ricky. I'm his many-over-great grand nephew. It's what we call him. Now piss off.
@@SmithMrCorona NO need to be rude. Whether you are a relative or not, doesn't change what was found.
She (the reconstructor) said precisely that in the documentary, about how insecure she was that maybe she influenced the end product, but as Moji Green said, she also reitereted that she did the process again and again, making sure she followed known anatomical standards to make an unbiased product.
That female descendant resembles him. I can see the startling resemblance. The man however, I don't see resemblance.. I don't know if Richard III actually had children, so when it comes to mitochondrial dna, I guess the female would have the resemblance traits.
None of them are related to him directly, and even if they were, its been too many generations to show. Theyre from the Richard III Society, who got the search going. Theyre only related like every other person with British blood in their veins is - se Dr. Teri Kings video on that.
Richard had 1 legitimate child, who sadly died age 10 in 1484. He was known to have only 2 illegitimate children from b4 his marriage, both died without children of their own. Again, see Dr. Teri Kings video on the DNA match. Basically, they found 2 maternal lines from his sister to match the mitochondrial DNA. For the Y-chro they had to go back to Edward III and find paternal lines through John of Gaunt.
Richard III had 1 male child but he didn't survive to become an adult. He (child) died of an illness. The matrilineal line is traced from Richard's sister, who married & had children.
Rather look at Richard than at the lady. Camera stayed on her :-(
Right. Ridiculous
It was awkward as hell I was like dam lady are you gonna say anything or just stare at him all weirdly lol
Later, further analysis of his DNA showed that his hair was very light brown, almost blonde
My DNA says my index finger should be longer than my ring finger.... it is not. Both are the same size. My DNA also says my hair should be very dark and my eyes blue, but my hair is medium ash brown, and my eyes are green hazel. Just because your DNA says you should be one thing doesn't mean you are. It all comes down to how strong of weak your genes are. In my case my father's darker hair gene's were not as powerful as my mother's blond ones.
@@allies7184 That's very interesting... Isn't some of it about recessive genes? In your case, for example, does your appearance mean your father actually has family (a recent ancestor) with genes for your colour of hair and eyes?
My dad was black-haired and brown-eyed, my mother white blonde darkening to dark blonde, and blue-eyed. Each had one red-haired, blue-eyed parent. I am red-haired and blue-eyed. Just thought that info might help explain my perspective on the gene thing.
Umm, maybe he got brown after the puberty? Because my sister hair is getting black too after puberty, and i got lighter eyes and lighter hair after 18? Just probably because his paintings, all with black hair
@@dewihajarahmad you could be right. A lot of people’s hair darkens with age.
The word you looking for is Dominance
Thought it was Lawrence Olivier.
Richard 3 is a king from the Plantagenêt dynasty so with french roots (house of Anjou). The Plantagenêt ruled England for centuries, especially during the 100 years war. Honestly he looks like the french actor Jean Dujardin🤣
Are you sure you've take a good look at Jean Dujardin ?
Ooo so that means he was half french 🇫🇷🇫🇷
And a fun fact is his sweet wife Anne nevile is 100 percent English and his sister in law Queen Elizabeth woodvile is also 100 percent English 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
"Well, he got quite alot of teeth missing from the mandible, so..." she said lol 😆
Well, the man IS British!! 🇬🇧
Hahahahhaha that's pretty clever!
"Let's see here... OK he has a total jacked up yuck mouth: yep, he's English"
Murica!!!
All in breathtaking 240p....
4:18 RUN FOR YOUR LIVES IT'S JOAQUIN PHOENIX!!!!
Richard III looks like lord farquad from shrek
I'm in shock
He looks like my romanian neighbours...
Wait, really?
Looks like the actor who plays Richard iii in the tv show the White Queen
Aneurin Barnard. Its so ironic and amazing
Indeed!
Philippa Langley is in love with Richard III.
of course she is - read the daughter of time by josephine tey :)
So am I and many others.
4:15 thank me later
I FIND ALL THIS FASCINATING , PRETTY COOL ,
They should do from all royal skeletons faces. You got idea go for it open graves and make faces.
Tremendous skill......
A good looking bloke to be sure.I am glad has has been given a decent burial. As he was Catholic he should have been given a Requiem Mass.I will offer up prayers for him should he be in purgatory.
Simon Farnaby from Horrible History? Actually though portraits of Richard already existed.
the portraits were purposely distorted so people are not sure what he looked like
Royal painters back in the day are like the photoshop editors today
@@Xynic48 Yep! They wanted to keep their own heads!
Am I the only one that sees Terry Jones face on the 3D render near the beginning of this, as well as the thumbnail? That's why I'm here. I thought Richard III was a bit he was doing back then, like a "Bad King gag"
Well what do you know, he looks nothing like Sir Lawrence Olivia.
I find it difficult to understand how they can determine the shape of the nose, especially the tip and the flare of the nostrils.
Protip: they can't
some of it is a guess, some based on the age of the individual and most based on the nasal bones.
History appears to show all these ancient kings were alternating cold and hot blooded; depending on the situation to keep their royal asses on the throne. Am I wrong?
Looks like a young Lawrence Olivier!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wow
had one of his ancestores been charged for occupying the parking lot for a few hundred years??
The last English king to lose his crown on the battlefield.
I think the reconstruction was influenced a little by the famous painting of Richard.
DNA testing showed, that with very high probability he had blond hair and blue eyes. So I found it a bit weird, that the reconstruction was given a wig of very dark brown hair exactly as in the portrait, which wasnt even painting until a couple of decades after his death and differs from contemporary descriptions of him.
Im aware of Dr. Wilkinson's excellent work, but I cant help but wonder, if she was too influenced by knowing, who he was and the famous painting, coz the reconstruction looks like a bust made to copy the painting. Tho ofc the wig does a lot, and again I dont understand, why a wig in a wrong color was chosen, except if she was going by the painting.
I wonder if this reconstruction accurately shows correct eyelids, ear lobes - attached or not? Lips - thin or full?
I doubt he had Lord Mick Jagger lips.
Ive seen a couple of documentaries, where Dr. Wilkinson did face reconstructions. She explained, that nose, ears, lips etc are educated guesses, as there are little to no bones to work from. So she guesses from her experience, what fits with the rest of the face, whats most likely.
In this case, tho, I think, she was very much influenced by knowing, whose face she was reconstructing, and knowing the famous painting, as the reconstruction is the spitting image of a painting, that has provable errors in it (compared to contemporary descriptions of him) and was painted decades after his death by some1, who never met him. Including giving the reconstruction a wig exactly like the painting in contradiction with the DNA results.
Naaaah.... that is noel fielding!!!!!!
Interesting vid. They don’t go over this stuff in school
Lord Farquad
Toshiyuki Suzuki, thanks for the best laugh in ages!!
Impressive.
Just goes to show whether royal or not, he ended up in a parking lot.
it's just an approximation.
How do they figure out his nose and ears?
They guess.
My granny princess Marianna Cottone she descents from Ancients kings of Wessex and from Charlemagne but also from king Henry Il of England
Ummmm looks exactly like Sir Lawrence Olivier in Richard lll....did you really do your homework?
Caroline Wilkinson IS the best. 👍🏻
Usually she does really good work. But I think, this reconstruction looks like a copy of the famous painting. I think, she was influenced by knowing, whose face she was reconstructing, and knowing that famous painting. How else would it look so alike, when the painting was made decades after Richards death by a painter, who never met him, and looking different from contemporary descriptions of him as well as contradicted by the DNA results?
Aber warum ist er denn nach vollzogener Identifizierung nicht wie ein richtiger König begraben worden?
Looks like the lead singer of Jesus Jones.
My richard the third looks different 🤔
Keng Richard thauth hey will nouht day
under the road ?? the most weird thing to hear and the most funniest ever heard lol
so he looked like Sir Lawrence Olivier
Looks like Freddie Boyle. .
not the same in the painting ...
he not
Test
Hasta que tanto es reconstrucción y que tanto influye el cuadro para la reconstrucción?
Ve el documental.
We’re the teeth lost at Bosworth?
were. "we're" means "we are".
Who are you asking?
How do these people know what coloured hair he had.
Dna
He dont looked like a englishman.
Well...the Plantagenets came from a French royal family so probably that's why.
No...
NO!!!!!
*What was King Richard III's last name?*
Plantagenet.
Notfourth, for sure....
Plantagenet was their last name just like Henry VIII’s name is Henry Tudor. His name is Richard Plantagenet. The Plantagenets are from a French royal family.
@@princessjune
*Very interesting...*
Third?
I wonder who is this? They have found the real "king" Richard III & that guy is not him!!!..-KING
He resembles Justin Trudeau.
You're either blind, or can't be bothered to open your eyes when looking at people.
@@Free_Falastin2024 There is no need to be rude. Geez.
@@cinthia9602 Don't mind him. He just consume too much soy.
Trudeau looks like the statue of liberty, just more gay.
@@Eza_yuta ok froggie
So if I found the skeleton of Mona Lisa.. I reconstruct her face and look just like her painting?
! is that the dude from paddington?
Why are people so interested in knowing other person lives?...was it because richard is a king and you all want to dwelve in knowing his life?
Probably, because some people loves history, like physicians love physics and artists love painting
After waiting nearly 5 minutes to see what King Dick's face looked like, we get a GLIMPSE of it for about 5 seconds!!! Very, very disappointed! At the very least, we could have been given a long, searching look for ourselves!
Ever heard of the PAUSE Button? geezus
Stop your video
Also, this is a shortened version of the original film. I suggest you seek out the original, or access videos by the University of Leicester.
A fascinating documentary unfortunately marred by the melodramatic, dreary Phillipa.
The blonde woman at the end is so incredibly irritating.
757WN Why you're lying ? Tell me.
They obviously tried to make him as appealing as possible. No way in hell the deformed hunchback king looked like that. He probably more closely resembled that creep who sold Sparta to Xerxes in that 300 movie. Be realistic people.
they did a whole investigation into his spinal problem and it wasn't even that bad he could stand straight up the only problem he would of had was breathing in armor for long periods of time which is probably how he died after being taken off his horse in battle he wouldn't of been a hunch back because they found a volunteer with the same spinal problem he had they even trained him to fight on horseback and made him a whole suit of armor to wear whatever stories you've read there bullshit how about you actually research more into this documentary before talking shit!
I know not as to the beard, but the weird part I can definitely buy!
He wasn't exactly Quasimodo. and it didn't stop him fighting in battle.
Scoliosis and hunchback are 2 different conditions. And clearly he was fully functionable as a warrior, even the Tudors admitted, he fought well and died heroicly, even as they did everything to vilify and smear him. The deformed hunchback is Shakespeares invention, writing for the Tudor queen Elizabeth, another commissioned work of propaganda.
Puddlehumper, Shakespeare wrote fictional drama, not historical biographies.
Where dose one start, well, this is what I know , that person is not King Richard because the Kings remains are under the castle Where they have been sense the day he passed on, the body that was recovered was Henry the eighth, Henry's family tree was found decades ago in the archives and still is there today, believe me or don't . G
But henry the eight have his coffin next to his favourite wife, jane seymour and the other king.
looks nothing like him. of course we saw more of the "discoverer" than we did of the king.
How do you know what he looked like? Portraits were over-painted to distort his appearance. Subsequent accounts weren't reliable for political reasons. They've made this from his freaking skull - I think this is as close as we're going to get...
...nonetheless, you may have a point: I'm fairly sure that's actually Noel Fielding ;-)
@@dontbefatuousjeffrey2494 yeah I mean we will never know unless time travel
This guy's face next to "Fugly" in the dictionary. That's a face not even a mother could love.
Nah you guys found lord farquad.