Best Explanation Video on Personal Jurisdiction 2024 - IN PERSONAM JURISDICTION - Civil Procedure

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 28

  • @hunteranderson389
    @hunteranderson389 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Excellent excellent excellent thorough explanation, especially on the reasonableness factors. Thanks!!

  • @marioraimondi670
    @marioraimondi670 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great explanation

    • @JDsimplified
      @JDsimplified  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @TheSaintlo
    @TheSaintlo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You're simply an extremely smart woman with a beautiful voice.

    • @JDsimplified
      @JDsimplified  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheSaintlo Awe! Thank you. I hope the lesson was valuable to your studies.

  • @cristinavillarrealmeza9502
    @cristinavillarrealmeza9502 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is amazing! Where can I find your outlines?

  • @alanakarmiol5768
    @alanakarmiol5768 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    THANK YOUUUU!! By far the best video on this topic. How do I access them all?

  • @yeahaight3495
    @yeahaight3495 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is great 👍 reviewing Civ Pro as a 1L

    • @JDsimplified
      @JDsimplified  ปีที่แล้ว

      Every time I get these comments, I smile for hours. So glad you find my vids to be a value-add to your learning experience.

    • @yeahaight3495
      @yeahaight3495 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JDsimplified Your videos will serve as the basis for my outline, and I’m going to share your channel with friends! Thank you so much for dedicating the time and effort it took to make these!

  • @Dr.HowieFeltersnatch
    @Dr.HowieFeltersnatch 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    When you really think about it, how does the 2021 Ford case not overrule the precedent in WorldWide Volkswagon v. Woodson?
    They are pretty similar fact patterns with opposite holdings.
    I just don’t see how what Ford did was substantially more of a purposeful availment than what WorldWide Volkswagon did. Pretty subtle at best imho.

    • @JDsimplified
      @JDsimplified  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi! The Supreme Court actually relied on the Worldwide Volkswagen case to support its decision in Ford. You are right that these two are so similar, and both address purposeful availment. However, Ford conceded that it had contacts within Montana and Minnesota. The plaintiffs in Ford brought their vehicles to the forum, just like the Robinsons did in World-Wide Volkswagen, true. The difference in the Ford case is that Ford had substantial contacts within the forum, whereas VW did not have any contact with Oklahoma (the forum state in that case). Specifically, the Ford Court considered the billboards, commercials, advertisements, and direct mail which were seen or circulated within Minnesota and Montana. Also note that Ford didn’t consider the reasonableness factors.
      Hope this clarifies it! Thanks for watching!

  • @WhatWhat-ot5nr
    @WhatWhat-ot5nr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND SERVICE OF PROCESS IS THE SAME THING?

    • @JDsimplified
      @JDsimplified  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@WhatWhat-ot5nr Service of process is the legal procedure that involves delivering a summons and a copy of a complaint to a defendant, which are the documents that initiate a lawsuit. The summons informs the defendant of the case against them, and the complaint details the allegations of wrongdoing. The delivery of these documents is called service of process.

  • @chadkline4268
    @chadkline4268 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No, a court requires territorial jurisdiction in addition. There are 3 forms of jurisdiction that are required. And personal jurisdiction requires US citizen status. A court does not have jurisdiction over actions arising from foreign territory (non-govt territory).
    The event that gives rise to an action must be within the territory of the court, and the judge+jury+attorneys+law must also arise from that territory. A court can't mix+match from various jurisdictions.

  • @lemarcoX
    @lemarcoX 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    where is min contact for PJ?

    • @JDsimplified
      @JDsimplified  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In this lecture. You need to watch the whole thing; lol. I promise the lecture gets better.

  • @steves.9644
    @steves.9644 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    🔥🤓

  • @MattSmith-ji6bj
    @MattSmith-ji6bj 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    way better than barbri

    • @JDsimplified
      @JDsimplified  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Awee! Thank you. So glad you found it helpful.

  • @luisdiaz8604
    @luisdiaz8604 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    BETTER THAN BARBRI

    • @JDsimplified
      @JDsimplified  ปีที่แล้ว

      Awe! 🥹 thank you! It means a lot! I’m going to post supplemental justification in the next few days.

  • @SJ-lm7xz
    @SJ-lm7xz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    THE STATE OF STATES are corporations. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Inc. Not the same as The State of Nevada or Nevada State.

    • @chadkline4268
      @chadkline4268 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😢
      STATE OF NEVADA =
      State of Nevada =
      Federal territory within a state
      state of Nevada =
      Nevada (state)
      Caps mean a proper noun: a person, place, or thing that is distinguished from the ordinary use of that noun.

  • @AkSnowflake
    @AkSnowflake 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A State which is not a living breathing woman or man cannot be sovereign!! This is not correct....

    • @chadkline4268
      @chadkline4268 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A sovereign is the owner of land.

  • @chicblackgirl718
    @chicblackgirl718 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Does anyone know where I can get the outline she provides? Thank you!