Step Down Method for Allocating Support Costs

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ส.ค. 2024
  • This video shows how to use the Step-down Method (aka Sequential Allocation Method) to allocate the costs of multiple support departments when those support departments provide services to each other. With the Step-down Method, you first sequentially rank the support departments. Then you allocate the costs of the first support department to the operating divisions and other support department(s). After allocating all of the first support department's costs, you proceed to the second support department and begin its costs (which include any costs that were allocated to the second department by the first department). When allocating the costs of the second support department, however, you do not allocate any costs to the first support department. Thus, while the Step-down Method is an improvement upon the Direct Method in that it allocates some support department costs, it still does not fully allocate the costs attributable to inter-department services between the support departments. To fully capture this interaction, one must use the Reciprocal Method.
    Edspira is your source for business and financial education. To view the entire video library for free, visit www.Edspira.com
    To like us on Facebook, visit / edspira
    Edspira is the creation of Michael McLaughlin, who went from teenage homelessness to a PhD. The goal of Michael's life is to increase access to education so all people can achieve their dreams. To learn more about Michael's story, visit www.MichaelMcLa...
    To follow Michael on Facebook, visit
    / prof.michael.mclaughlin
    To follow Michael on Twitter, visit
    / prof_mclaughlin-
    Edspira is the creation of Michael McLaughlin, an award-winning professor who went from teenage homelessness to a PhD. Edspira’s mission is to make a high-quality business education freely available to the world.
    -
    SUBSCRIBE FOR A FREE 53-PAGE GUIDE TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PLUS:
    • A 23-PAGE GUIDE TO MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING
    • A 44-PAGE GUIDE TO U.S. TAXATION
    • A 75-PAGE GUIDE TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS
    • MANY MORE FREE PDF GUIDES AND SPREADSHEETS
    * eepurl.com/dIaa5z
    -
    SUPPORT EDSPIRA ON PATREON
    * / prof_mclaughlin
    -
    GET CERTIFIED IN FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS, IFRS 16, AND ASSET-LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
    * edspira.thinki...
    -
    LISTEN TO THE SCHEME PODCAST
    * Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple...
    * Spotify: open.spotify.c...
    * Website: www.edspira.co...
    -
    GET TAX TIPS ON TIKTOK
    * / prof_mclaughlin
    -
    ACCESS INDEX OF VIDEOS
    * www.edspira.co...
    -
    CONNECT WITH EDSPIRA
    * Facebook: / edspira
    * Instagram: / edspiradotcom
    * LinkedIn: / edspira
    -
    CONNECT WITH MICHAEL
    * Twitter: / prof_mclaughlin
    * LinkedIn: / prof-michael-mclaughlin
    -
    ABOUT EDSPIRA AND ITS CREATOR
    * www.edspira.co...
    * michaelmclaugh...

ความคิดเห็น • 66

  • @kyl33333
    @kyl33333 7 ปีที่แล้ว +136

    You just explained in 7 minutes what my professor failed to explain in 2 hours. Thank you.

    • @kazuwaaa4154
      @kazuwaaa4154 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i know right

    • @kazuwaaa4154
      @kazuwaaa4154 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We have like 3 hours per meeting in our class but my professor makes it very difficult for me to understand xD

    • @monkeymoonky7900
      @monkeymoonky7900 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      don't know why even waste my gas to attend the class...

    • @mrtasins
      @mrtasins ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@kazuwaaa4154 fr bro its totally frustrating

  • @blacklister3
    @blacklister3 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You are my new go-to for assistance with managerial accounting subjects! Your videos are so thorough and easy to understand. Thanks for all you do to help struggling students who have difficulty filling in the gaps from our textbooks. Bless you!

  • @ayl18
    @ayl18 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Your videos are the best!!!! They illuminate the subject far more than my textbook Thank you so much!

    • @Edspira
      @Edspira  8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      My pleasure! I'm glad you're mastering the concepts. Reading accounting textbooks is about as fun as staring at the wall :)

  • @nataliavoronova158
    @nataliavoronova158 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Great video. Thanks. Although it would be better if you explained the logic behind the ranking. If the highest rank goes to the department with highest costs incurred then wouldn't it be admin in this case?

  • @nathanalexanderschulhof2865
    @nathanalexanderschulhof2865 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My professor insists on using complicated tables but this is the best explanation ever!!! Such a simple way of thinking about it!!

  • @julieandrews2157
    @julieandrews2157 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I recently found your videos, and I wish I had found you sooner. Your videos make difficult concepts easier to understand. Thank you so much! I now have hope of passing my last for accounting classes. 🙂

  • @liamsanders1502
    @liamsanders1502 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I cannot thank you enough for making these videos! They are truly saving my hopes of passing this course. You are a legend

  • @Nott_Fifi
    @Nott_Fifi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am taking the Accounting program at university. but I don't listen to my professors, I study with Michael. He is the best!

  • @g16565
    @g16565 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You have not explained on what basis the ranking is being done.. That would have made this even more clearer even though the explanation is indeed very good.

  • @yuniorgalardy2781
    @yuniorgalardy2781 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great Video. Thank you.
    You make difficult concepts easy to understand. Please continue to share your knowledge with the world.

    • @Edspira
      @Edspira  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for the kind words and the encouragement!

  • @kaleabemiyayu1392
    @kaleabemiyayu1392 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    my new fav channel

    • @Edspira
      @Edspira  ปีที่แล้ว

      Welcome to the party!

  • @MyFinancialFocus
    @MyFinancialFocus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome explanation!

  • @susannaross4234
    @susannaross4234 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    WOW! I think I actually got it. I don't know why I found this so confusing before.

  • @fiooneer
    @fiooneer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your channel helps me so much, thank you

  • @nesu6021
    @nesu6021 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so so sooo much, this helped me a ton!!!

  • @Oxcilic
    @Oxcilic 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You're saving my dam life. Thank you

  • @rebeccahart9341
    @rebeccahart9341 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolutely amazing job! Clear and very understandable videos. Keep it up! :)

  • @prettyyella32
    @prettyyella32 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you 🙏
    I understand....

  • @axel7918
    @axel7918 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you

  • @shibaimtiaz7695
    @shibaimtiaz7695 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh my gosh !!! You are a genius

  • @johnnyneves19
    @johnnyneves19 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THANK YOU SO MUCH ♥ god bless you

    • @Edspira
      @Edspira  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you - best wishes to you as well!

  • @ibrahimzakria5178
    @ibrahimzakria5178 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Explanation. thanks guys

  • @brandoncruz9284
    @brandoncruz9284 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Anyone else having issues viewing Edspira's videos?

  • @jeremylaster3280
    @jeremylaster3280 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    your welcome your videos are very helpful.

    • @Edspira
      @Edspira  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jeremy, thanks so much!

  • @tarawnie
    @tarawnie 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    You missed one critical part, how did you rank them?

    • @lenku-vinceoosthuizen964
      @lenku-vinceoosthuizen964 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      STILL DONT KNOW LOL

    • @prettyyella32
      @prettyyella32 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      HR was the first in sequence. He said that.......

    • @DAfycariad
      @DAfycariad 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You rank in accordance to functional importance. Meaning that a company that ranks HR cost allocation extremely important for company wide functions (staying in business due to high costs %) will rank HR #1 and every other acct after that is ranked in lower importance (if that makes sense).
      Also, he did answer the question: "The ranking does matter, and this is usually based on the percentage of costs that a support department incurs to support other support departments. The support department with the highest percentage would be allocated first. Good question!"

    • @baynemarrowe2003
      @baynemarrowe2003 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Sometimes, it will be stated in the problem which service department to start but typically you start with the dept that renders service to the greatest number of other service depts and ends with the least number of other depts.

  • @samhuynh2867
    @samhuynh2867 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you so much!

  • @suziehaberman9802
    @suziehaberman9802 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    How do you know which support department to rank first?

    • @jimelewa7861
      @jimelewa7861 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Following

    • @Mustafa-jh9bt
      @Mustafa-jh9bt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@jimelewa7861 The ranking is based on the percentage of a support department providing services to another support department.
      Here to find the ranking we first use the cost driver ;
      Human resources: they provide services to the Administrative department so
      10,000/40000 *100 = 25%
      For the administrative department : human resources use 4000 of their hours, so
      4000/ 20000 * 100 = 20%
      In conclusion, we can say that more human resource services were provided to other support departments and should be allocated first.
      I hope this was useful :)

  • @DiaXisHD
    @DiaXisHD 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So how did you rank them?

  • @jeremylaster3280
    @jeremylaster3280 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you make a video on Spoilage costing -process costing and how to account for it. Your videos are a great help.

    • @Edspira
      @Edspira  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I currently have 8 videos on process costing (edspira.com/lessons/process-costing), but spoilage costing is not one of them. I will add this to my list of requested videos. Thanks!

  • @crazyturtle3920
    @crazyturtle3920 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    shouldn't the ranking start with the service department providing the most service to another service department? in that case the ranking should start with Administrative staff and not Human Resources?

  • @faded_thoughts
    @faded_thoughts ปีที่แล้ว

    Could someone please tell me what "Hierarchy stepdown" is?

  • @patm.7618
    @patm.7618 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hi, thank you for this video, =) How do I rank which goes first? for inst: human resource then administrative staff.

    • @aa-ot7vn
      @aa-ot7vn 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pat M. I’m wondering too, is it because administrative has more hours than HR so we know that we have a pre determination that HR hrs are going into the total Overall hrs in admin?

  • @jeremygailmanaois1202
    @jeremygailmanaois1202 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow. Thank youuu. You are very amazing sir...please make a video on fifo/lifo/weighted ave periodic and perpetual method.

    • @Edspira
      @Edspira  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I got you covered! I have an entire lesson on different inventory methods on the Edspira website. Check it out here: www.edspira.com/lessons/inventory/

    • @jeremygailmanaois1202
      @jeremygailmanaois1202 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you 😊

  • @sudheat
    @sudheat 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir this video picture is cluttered, could you please check and fix it

  • @deejaaay7600
    @deejaaay7600 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I understand that you never allocate things back, but for administrative staff, you have 10,000 hours towards HR. We just ignore that?

  • @anannyasaxena7896
    @anannyasaxena7896 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    there's a question please someone answer
    if the admin got 46000 then all of it got alloted to mountaineering and kayaking department then why did you say in the end that admin had got 6000 allocation. or was it just to brief the method ?

  • @janlyn622
    @janlyn622 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you have 3 services to 2 production, does the same method applies?

  • @jeremylaster3280
    @jeremylaster3280 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Does it matter order that you rank the support departments?

    • @Edspira
      @Edspira  6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The ranking does matter, and this is usually based on the percentage of costs that a support department incurs to support other support departments. The support department with the highest percentage would be allocated first. Good question!

    • @angelacui5358
      @angelacui5358 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      in your video, the HR is allocated firstly. so it should be allocating Admin first?

    • @jeremygailmanaois1202
      @jeremygailmanaois1202 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Edspira oh. Thank you. Can you please make a video on ranking service departments too?Thank you

    • @thisuserispanda
      @thisuserispanda 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@angelacui5358 yes that is correct

  • @Jabbs248
    @Jabbs248 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    what if there were 3 support departments? Would you proceed in the same way, only allocating support department costs to operating department costs for the first support department and only operating departments for the next 2?

    • @katherinecarroll6799
      @katherinecarroll6799 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Anthony Jabbour Yes. It does not matter how many support departments there are- you will only allocate costs to the first that is given and ignore the rest.

  • @muratulutas4811
    @muratulutas4811 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Türkiye'den selamlar.

  • @faithoverfear5148
    @faithoverfear5148 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You did not explain how the ranking is done

    • @DAfycariad
      @DAfycariad 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      You rank in accordance to functional importance. Meaning that a company that ranks HR cost allocation extremely important for company wide functions (staying in business due to high costs %) will rank HR #1 and every other acct after that is ranked in lower importance (if that makes sense).
      Also, he did answer the question: "The ranking does matter, and this is usually based on the percentage of costs that a support department incurs to support other support departments. The support department with the highest percentage would be allocated first. Good question!"