@@tylerhloewen that just attacks the queen, its losing since your literally down like a full knight while the opponent still has all of their minor pieces but you only with 2 rooks and 1 bishop. And also your position is trash at that point. Its literally -10… its -10 for white.. g4 is only good because its the only good move. Its a complete blunder of a position and pieces.
@@jonnyd595 Nh6 and you are protecting the pawn. If white decides to take with bishop, the gambit still doesn't work out because black now has the bishop open which prevents you to have to take with pawn.
I've been on the receiving end of that final gambit many times as black and have always just brought the knight back for no particular reason. Now I feel justified, never realizing that I was avoiding that follow up line
Just to point out that in the 7th Gambit near the start of it the knight on F6 can move to G4 as it is protected by the light squared bishop thus making the queens defence useless.
in the triple Muzio Gambit you said that we have a fork with the knight but the bishop could take the knight and a better move is g4 attacking the queen accorded to the engine.
YES! Stockfish says this move is +10 for black! Don't play this move it's a complete blunder leading to a rook pawn vs. rook knight bishop pawn endgame.
At 13:40, what should you do if black plays f6? I'm thinking of Re1, forcing Ne7; then Bc4, e6; Bxe6 Qe7. The bishop is still under attack and it looks like black now has enough defenders.
The Landau variation occurs a lot in some blackmar diemer gambit declined variations which morphs into similar position. Always fun to employ and it doesn't matter whether you sac the queen or bishop first, same unfortunate result for black. Only mate better is a smothered mate when a pawn delivers mate.I've had that once but naturally it takes a certain brand of patzer to fall into that one :)
Very instructive in learning new gambits if we can get the opportunity to play them, in the vienna gambit that you showed the only move after knight d5 is to take the pawn with check the king moves over then black's king plays f8, the only winning move for white after that is knight h3, then you follow up with h6 to attack the queen. This is a very complicated position afterwards, but makes for a fun game.
The "nasty fork" at time 5:59 is easily countered without apparent consequence when the dark square bishop captures the knight. Am I missing something?
1900-2000 and beaten title holders with the first and second gambit, I wonder what the win rate for the wing gambit is, for me that works really well both against Sicilian and French defense.
Great content, would love to get one on one sessions, but these opens are all dependant on the response, I would love to see a top 7 black opens against the most used white openings, unless that wouldn't make sense?
a few questions here In gambit 2, when u go for ND6, it can be taken by the bishop on f8, white will lose a piece In gambit 5, after Qb3, what if black plays pawn to e6? In gambit 7 which was 86% win rate, after pawn e5, black can move their knight to g4 since it was protected by the bishop on c8, what will we do after that?
@@seenitalready im not that good cause my elo is just around 1600 lmao, but chess is a fun game, especially when you succeeded in outwitting ur opponent
In the caro-kann defense, the horse can go to g4 in the 4th move as it is covered by the camel and we cannot take it with the queen and if we move the f file soldier to f3 ,the horse can escape to h6. Hence failing the whole Gambit/defence
I think Nelson just missed (on Gambit 7) that Knight g4 is reasonable move, because Bishop is defending this Knight and you can't really have it with your Queen
I like the content I really do, but i dont honestly see someone protect a pawn with a bishop for so long at 12:51. I think the most reasonable response would be for bishop to move out of c8 and move to e6. it provides an attack on your queen while being protected by a pawn, they are either forced to move queen or trade the queens and make the game last longer.
18:55 can someone explain me why does it have to be taken with the queen? It is the same if the bishop takes first and then give the checkmate with the queen right?
For the DOUBLE MUZIO Gambit at 5:39, if white plays Qd5 check, black will most probably play Qe6 and then white can take the pawn on f4, giving check and then counterattack somewhere by saving the Queen. Am I right??????? Please reply
13:40 black can move the pawn from I7 to I6 so if you move the bishops from I1 to C4 ,black can move the pawn from e7 to e6 and they defend everythink and your king will be expose
The matsukevich gambit is easy to defend when the queen and bishop are attacking just put a pawn diagonal from the bishop so if the bishop takes then the other pawn takes and if the bishop moves one square away just move a pawn 2 ranks and block the bishop 12:44
That's why it's only a 66% win I guess... My wife knows chicken shit about these gambits and openings, yet she would just make a move like pawn to H6 and I would be just sad
5:43. I feel like if I played this in a game black would just take my bishop. I'm guessing since it wasn't brought up its a bad move but I'd like to know why that is?
All of you YT chess gurus should start a go-fund-me page to collect money for the top 3 pay off for a on-line tournament. I bet you can collect some pretty big money for a 100% pay off to the top 3,---and it may be the best money any of you ever make with the game. Plus, you can structure the tournament the way you want,---not the way the russians do it. It would be interesting to see if it grows.
2:05 for the elephant gambit, when you’re in this position, what would you do if white decided to capture the a3 pawn with the bishop with check, rather than with the knight?
2:08 what if white instead of capturing with the kinght they capture with the bishop checking your king? I Know it's better to capture with kinght as they're attacking your rook but what if they use the other piece?
yes. The position is still winning for black but Nd6+ is the wrong move and loses on the spot pretty much. engine recommends g4 which is pretty crushing
I just wanted to point something out is the minute 6:00 in the triple muzio gambit when you fork the king and the queen with the knight why can't the bishop just take.
i usually dont like playing gambits because usually its risky and also it feels cheaty to win without even applying ur brain very often all you're doing is playing some moves you memorised while your opponent has to actually think if they dont know the opening
In response to the Fried Liver I prefer not to just block the bishop with d5 but instead go into the Ponziani-Steinitz Gambit with Nxe4. The move is somewhat dubious but because of that most people won't know the line, and white can easily lose on the spot by playing Nxf6 (respond with Qh4, maybe eventually your dark square bishop joins the attack, and it's just impossible for white to defend everything). Nxe4 is a bit better but black still has the advantage after forking with d5. The only correct move is Bxf6+, but if you know the line you can get out without being much worse, which in my opinion is a fair trade-off for all the times that white falls right into the trap without a second thought.
You write f6 many times. You mean f7. Also 4...Nxe4 is dubious, hoping for 5. Nxf7. Sadly 5. Bxf7+ and white is winning (black is not worse but simply losing).
I play the Meitner-Mieses gambit! Truly super fun to play - the idea is that the Queen can not return to f6 when they take on f2, because of the Knight, so they no longer can protect their rook. You're also threatening to fork either side.
12:02 Umm I don’t get it. Why didn’t they just move the pawn in h6? Because I once did that move (dg5) and they did the move h6 so I had to move the bishop on h4 (to continue pinning the queen) then they move another pawn to g5 that is why I had to move my bishop to g3 which means I’m not pinning the queen anymore then the game goes on (Excuse my English and I’m still a beginner that’s why I don’t get why dxe5 is better than h6)
Stuck at 1000 elo? Not anymore: chessvibescourses.thinkific.com/
I'm stuck at 2200+ blitz lichess
stuck at 300
Stuck at 785
@@Kyle-lq4by How????
@@arijohn4138 lmao i’m kidding i’m 1000
Next vid: “to prepare for this video I analyzed all games of chess that have ever been played in the entire universe…”
“So i did some mining off camera”
@@dumbwinner2188 but for chess analysis
“As you can see here glipborp is trying to pin the queen with a bishop”
r/technicallythetruth
@@simaosantos6378 how is this "technically the truth"?
Please make a video on how to beat stockfish in 4 moves. Thanks 👍
Knight on d6 can be taken by bishop on f8. 05:59
I was looking at this line wondering how this isn't winning for black. ND6 is a terrible move. Even the recommended moves before ND6 are pretty bad.
yes right
In the Caro line he also straight up suggests a queen hang.
Queen check and take the pawn on f4
@@thatcringelord??
at 5:57 Knight to d6 doenst fork king and queen. bishop would take the knight
but pawn g4 in that position wins the game
according to the theory black resigns there
@@tylerhloewen if you play Nd6 before g4 you loose the control over f6 and your position is basically trash
@@tylerhloewen that just attacks the queen, its losing since your literally down like a full knight while the opponent still has all of their minor pieces but you only with 2 rooks and 1 bishop. And also your position is trash at that point. Its literally -10… its -10 for white.. g4 is only good because its the only good move. Its a complete blunder of a position and pieces.
For the Muzio Gambit at 6:00 the bishop can capture the knight right
nasty fork :)
yep
Yeah, I saw that too. Its not much of a fork when the bishop captures the night. Maybe I missed something
they can however it would be better to go bishop E5
It can
5:58 Bxd6?
18:15 Knight can move to g4, it's protected by the bishop.
Just kick it away with h3 and proceed
@@jonnyd595
Nh6 and you are protecting the pawn. If white decides to take with bishop, the gambit still doesn't work out because black now has the bishop open which prevents you to have to take with pawn.
I've been on the receiving end of that final gambit many times as black and have always just brought the knight back for no particular reason. Now I feel justified, never realizing that I was avoiding that follow up line
Just to point out that in the 7th Gambit near the start of it the knight on F6 can move to G4 as it is protected by the light squared bishop thus making the queens defence useless.
@@raysatadal1137king f6
i am glad somebody said it :') literally that's what they do 90% of the time
NELSON LOPEZ is above the rest!! 10 out of 10 or a perfect 10!! Idea, presentation, clearness etc... all the best!! So deserves a HUGE THANK YOU!!!
in the triple Muzio Gambit you said that we have a fork with the knight but the bishop could take the knight and a better move is g4 attacking the queen accorded to the engine.
I saw that too the bishop can just take the knight and there's no fork
YES! Stockfish says this move is +10 for black! Don't play this move it's a complete blunder leading to a rook pawn vs. rook knight bishop pawn endgame.
also in a "triple" Muzio Gambit there's no 3rd sacrifice,. You can't really call it a sacrifice, if it's safely protected.
@@HiArashi13 he sacs his D pawn, no? sac the knight, the bishop and then pawn would be the 3rd. but yeah he does say bishop is the 3rd
At 13:40, what should you do if black plays f6? I'm thinking of Re1, forcing Ne7; then Bc4, e6; Bxe6 Qe7. The bishop is still under attack and it looks like black now has enough defenders.
The Landau variation occurs a lot in some blackmar diemer gambit declined variations which morphs into similar position. Always fun to employ and it doesn't matter whether you sac the queen or bishop first, same unfortunate result for black. Only mate better is a smothered mate when a pawn delivers mate.I've had that once but naturally it takes a certain brand of patzer to fall into that one :)
6:00 you got this nasty fork and black can resign now
The f8 bishop's honest reaction
19:00, why does the queen have to take first? I can only see checkmate, even if the bishop was to take first.
rule of cool, mating with the bishop only is cooler than with a queen. practiaclly, there's no difference.
@@godofmoi96 That's what I thought.
Very instructive in learning new gambits if we can get the opportunity to play them, in the vienna gambit that you showed the only move after knight d5 is to take the pawn with check the king moves over then black's king plays f8, the only winning move for white after that is knight h3, then you follow up with h6 to attack the queen. This is a very complicated position afterwards, but makes for a fun game.
The "nasty fork" at time 5:59 is easily countered without apparent consequence when the dark square bishop captures the knight. Am I missing something?
Yes, you are missing the fact that the lesson is given by a weak NM, not a real GM.
@@draganandrei5356 but that's basic which we all cud find out..even a 1200-1300 can see that coming.
@@draganandrei5356 That weak nm still is quadruple your elo.
@@Love.Masculinity I'm 500 and I saw that lol
1900-2000 and beaten title holders with the first and second gambit, I wonder what the win rate for the wing gambit is, for me that works really well both against Sicilian and French defense.
5:59 is there any reason one can't take the knight with Bishop 🧐?
nope. Nd6+ is the wrong move and a losing one. g4 is the winning move in that position
Great content, would love to get one on one sessions, but these opens are all dependant on the response, I would love to see a top 7 black opens against the most used white openings, unless that wouldn't make sense?
This channel is a gem, unlike many popular ones feeding on clickbaits. So much value. Thank you so much😊
a few questions here
In gambit 2, when u go for ND6, it can be taken by the bishop on f8, white will lose a piece
In gambit 5, after Qb3, what if black plays pawn to e6?
In gambit 7 which was 86% win rate, after pawn e5, black can move their knight to g4 since it was protected by the bishop on c8, what will we do after that?
For gambit 5, bishop could just take the queen if black pawn to e6
@@irfavengers01 Are you all robots? I’ve started to like chess, I didn’t realize how competitive & serious it was growing up - What’s your elo?
@@seenitalready im not that good cause my elo is just around 1600 lmao, but chess is a fun game, especially when you succeeded in outwitting ur opponent
In the caro-kann defense, the horse can go to g4 in the 4th move as it is covered by the camel and we cannot take it with the queen and if we move the f file soldier to f3 ,the horse can escape to h6.
Hence failing the whole Gambit/defence
I think Nelson just missed (on Gambit 7) that Knight g4 is reasonable move, because Bishop is defending this Knight and you can't really have it with your Queen
I noticed that too, but white could just play h3 and kick the knight back to h6, which is not a very useful square for the knight
That bishop move was really amazing, I was thinking what just happened but then I realised it's Nelson bro😂😂🥰
12:27 Why did you not explain why f6 can not be played? I didn't see any reason why it is not a good move that drives the dark-squared bishop away
15:51 Meitner-Mieses Gambit Black can actually play Kf8, looks weird, but does the job.
18:58 why does it matter if you take with the queen or the bishop? isnt it mate anyway?
5:58 "black can resign now"
*Black takes knight with bishop*
"Oh fu-"
5:58... you dont have that fork cause Bishop takes knight D6
Noticed that as well xD
Yeah....
Well theory says the knight is sacrificed
@@shinoasada4590 video says nasty fork.... not sacrificed... you got the follow up moves for this knight sacrificed?
Pfff plz never heard of the quadruple muzio gambit I guess ...
i liked this channel. its very chilly and really gives a chess vibes. i love how he didnt even put a song in it to preserve chess vibes. keep it up!
5:59 hows that a fork, bishop at f8 can easily take it right?
18:17 knight can go g4 because if queen takes then bishop retakes
I like the content I really do, but i dont honestly see someone protect a pawn with a bishop for so long at 12:51. I think the most reasonable response would be for bishop to move out of c8 and move to e6. it provides an attack on your queen while being protected by a pawn, they are either forced to move queen or trade the queens and make the game last longer.
18:55 can someone explain me why does it have to be taken with the queen? It is the same if the bishop takes first and then give the checkmate with the queen right?
For the DOUBLE MUZIO Gambit at 5:39, if white plays Qd5 check, black will most probably play Qe6 and then white can take the pawn on f4, giving check and then counterattack somewhere by saving the Queen.
Am I right???????
Please reply
At 6:02 you mention a fork but what’s to stop the bishop from just taking?
At 5:58 into the video you suggest to fork king and queen with knight but clearly blacks dark square bishop can capture knight???
@Chess Vibes
At time 6:00 it is a fork but won't black bishop will take knight at d6?
You should totally do a video on the "C57 Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Fritz Variation" with white playing d6, a very dubious move
13:40 black can move the pawn from I7 to I6 so if you move the bishops from I1 to C4 ,black can move the pawn from e7 to e6 and they defend everythink and your king will be expose
The matsukevich gambit is easy to defend when the queen and bishop are attacking just put a pawn diagonal from the bishop so if the bishop takes then the other pawn takes and if the bishop moves one square away just move a pawn 2 ranks and block the bishop 12:44
In gambit 5, a simple pawn H6 kicks out the bishop, which if bishop backdown, can be followed by G5
That's why it's only a 66% win I guess... My wife knows chicken shit about these gambits and openings, yet she would just make a move like pawn to H6 and I would be just sad
At 14:06 what do you play when black moves his pawn to h6 attacking the bishop?
@10:20 couldn't knight from e5 go to g4 to attack bishop and defend check spot?
9:56 the knight can actually fork the queen and the king in that position
5:43. I feel like if I played this in a game black would just take my bishop. I'm guessing since it wasn't brought up its a bad move but I'd like to know why that is?
At 5:58 you say you could fork my king and queen but what would be your response if I played Bishop takes knight?
18:56 Why do you take with the Queen instead of the Bishop, i mean i looks kinda same to me.... is it just style point ???
For the Matsukevich Gambit at 12:48, after White plays Queen b3, what's the optimal line if Black just kicks the Bishop with Pawn f6?
I was also thinking this
At 12:27 what if black plays f6? What should white do?
13:42, what about pone to F6? It would attack the bishop and defending the king. Also the queen cant go in since the rook is still there
First tournament in 7 years coming soon... www.patreon.com/chessvibes
Thanks for your video man 🥰
All of you YT chess gurus should start a go-fund-me page to collect money for the top 3 pay off for a on-line tournament. I bet you can collect some pretty big money for a 100% pay off to the top 3,---and it may be the best money any of you ever make with the game. Plus, you can structure the tournament the way you want,---not the way the russians do it. It would be interesting to see if it grows.
Good luck my friend.
2:06 what if the bishop captures on f7 checking the king? What would we do
This video is incredible. Thanks so much for putting in the work to show us this stuff. You're great at this, overall, btw.
2:05 for the elephant gambit, when you’re in this position, what would you do if white decided to capture the a3 pawn with the bishop with check, rather than with the knight?
You slide ur king up and have all the same threats
Elephant gambit is absolute trash tho still don't play it
At 5:58 knight fork,, black bishop can capture the knight right??
18:55 Why take with the queen and then bishop rather then opposite.
Can someone explain why at 18:58 you need to first take with the queen and not the bishop?
3:56 pawn g3 is a better move for black, black is up a pawn and may create a weak pawn structure on white king's side
In the King's Gambit (one of my favorite openings) you missed that black's bishop is defending d6 so the knight can't fork there
2:08 what if white instead of capturing with the kinght they capture with the bishop checking your king? I Know it's better to capture with kinght as they're attacking your rook but what if they use the other piece?
The aim of the attack is to capture the rook or queen
at 9:53, the knight can fork the rook and queen (potentially king too) if Ng6 ? Or am I not seeing something
H7 pawn
5:56 cant blacks dark squared bishop just take?
yes. The position is still winning for black but Nd6+ is the wrong move and loses on the spot pretty much. engine recommends g4 which is pretty crushing
@@ph34rocious i would have prob done that or get my other rook into the action.
5:58 I don't see a "nasty fork." What prevents Bxd6?
5:57 Doesn't that just blunder to Bxf6, free knight? Or am I missing something?
13:16 why can't black play Qc8 because surely then if bf7 then kd8 avoids mate?
9:52 regardless if king moves up or to the side, knight can move to g6 threatening the queen and checking the king (unless the king moves to d8
h7 pon : Am i joke to you?
I just wanted to point something out is the minute 6:00 in the triple muzio gambit when you fork the king and the queen with the knight why can't the bishop just take.
When you played Nd6 in the Muzio gambit, Black can just take it with the bishop right?
18:58 why 1st to take with the queen and not bishop ?
it mate regardles
Hey, great video!!!!
But at 9:55, while saying white has no threats -- white has a fork on the King and Queen from the move Ng7
Is that an analysis blunder @ 5:57? Seems like black can just take the knight with the bishop.
5:59 black bishop can take that hanging knight or is there a reason why he cant?
So basically you JUST need to get into a game where you both make the correct first 40 moves, then you will be up a pawn
5:58 Nelson sir , the knight can be captured by dark bishop .
13:18. Can't we slide the queen to c8 to save checkmate
I think after Qc8:
Bxf7+ Kd8
Be6 Nd4 (Na5 you can just move your queen)
Bxd7 Nxb3
Bxc8+ looks extremely winning
@@DrPyle-ys2xn after BxD7 can't we capture the bishop with queen??
5:37 why cant pawn take bishop ? queen trade and knight takes queen back, what else can black do ?
18:59 "of course you gotta take with the Queen.." YESS THAT"S THE SPIRIT
taking with the bishop is simply a blunder
i usually dont like playing gambits because usually its risky and also it feels cheaty to win without even applying ur brain
very often all you're doing is playing some moves you memorised while your opponent has to actually think if they dont know the opening
9:38 . Why is the white knight not capturing the pawn? (Instead of the bishop)
In response to the Fried Liver I prefer not to just block the bishop with d5 but instead go into the Ponziani-Steinitz Gambit with Nxe4. The move is somewhat dubious but because of that most people won't know the line, and white can easily lose on the spot by playing Nxf6 (respond with Qh4, maybe eventually your dark square bishop joins the attack, and it's just impossible for white to defend everything). Nxe4 is a bit better but black still has the advantage after forking with d5. The only correct move is Bxf6+, but if you know the line you can get out without being much worse, which in my opinion is a fair trade-off for all the times that white falls right into the trap without a second thought.
Yeah that’s the best
Nah just tracker counterattack
You write f6 many times. You mean f7. Also 4...Nxe4 is dubious, hoping for 5. Nxf7. Sadly 5. Bxf7+ and white is winning (black is not worse but simply losing).
9:56 knight g6? Check the king while forking the h8 rook and blacks queen?
5:59 the d6 sqare is covered from the bishop on f8
Thanks for making this helpful video, now it's easy for me to decide what gambit to play.
2:06 but what if they capture with the bishop with check, rather than with the knight?
2:05 what if white had used bishop instead of knight, to capture the pawn and also check?
I play the Meitner-Mieses gambit! Truly super fun to play - the idea is that the Queen can not return to f6 when they take on f2, because of the Knight, so they no longer can protect their rook. You're also threatening to fork either side.
5:59 I don't get it. What about Bxd6?
6:02 ”Black can resign now”, very untrue, black has more than enough compensation for the queen
12:21 couldn't black move to f6, threatening the bishop and blocking the threat on the queen?
12:02 Umm I don’t get it. Why didn’t they just move the pawn in h6? Because I once did that move (dg5) and they did the move h6 so I had to move the bishop on h4 (to continue pinning the queen) then they move another pawn to g5 that is why I had to move my bishop to g3 which means I’m not pinning the queen anymore then the game goes on (Excuse my English and I’m still a beginner that’s why I don’t get why dxe5 is better than h6)
At 5:58 can't black's dark squared bishop just take the white knight forking the kind and queen?
6:00 What about black's bishop?
At 18:34 why not knight to g4? Surely it’s protected?
6:00 Why wouldn't Black move use the F3 Bishop to capture the White Knight?
5:55 can’t black just capture with the bishop?
the triple muzio"s gambit was de the best i ever seen. Keep working in your videos, i enjoyed very much, Greetings from Argenitna.
5:58 "that nasty fork" blunders a full knight
18:20 The knight can sill move to g4 guarded by the bishop