What's the difference between ASD and LRFD in Structural Design?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ค. 2024
  • In this video, Trevor will be highlighting the differences between ASD (Allowable Stress Design), and LRFD (Load and Resistance Factor Design). This video will be taking a look at their respective equilibrium equations (Factor of Safety vs. Design Factor) as well as examine the different load combinations.
    Interested in learning more about SkyCiv and other Structural Engineering Topics? Make sure to
    Sign up for a Free account:
    bit.ly/3y79DSP
    Follow us on LinkedIn:
    / skyciv-engineering
    Follow and Like us on Facebook:
    / skycivengineering
    Check out our Software Documentation to learn about the SkyCiv platform:
    bit.ly/3boLfCj
    Check out our Tutorials to learn more about structural engineering topics:
    bit.ly/3fcJIAs
    ----------------------------------
    SkyCiv is a cloud-based Structural Design and Analysis software, you can access our software from anywhere on any device (PC/Mac/Desktop/Tablet). Sign up for a free trial today to explore: bit.ly/34rbuBO
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @OtherwiseKnownAsB
    @OtherwiseKnownAsB 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Coming from Australia where AS1170 uses only LRFD, and having NOT been taught the difference at university, that helped a lot with my understanding. You hear these two terms quite a lot in structural engineering. Thanks Trevor.

    • @SkyCiv
      @SkyCiv  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great point! Different countries might only use a single provision for structural design

  • @dmontenegro
    @dmontenegro 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This was incredibly helpful, thank you!

    • @SkyCiv
      @SkyCiv  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Daniel, glad you liked it

  • @armandogilmayorca2057
    @armandogilmayorca2057 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your video was very useful ti understand both design methods. Thanks!

  • @oimpe
    @oimpe 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice Video! I use your Wind Software really appreciate you all's work and product!

  • @husseinrahimi5357
    @husseinrahimi5357 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dear Trevor
    Thank you for your nice video.
    Would you explain me the philosophy of increasing the loads and decreasing the resistance in LRFD design method . If we are at the elastic zone in HOOK curve or pass to plastic zone in LRFD method ? . What is the main concept by increasing the loads if we do not pass to plastic zone, or it is virtual and we remain in elastic zone. I can’t catch the beauty of LRFD if don’t understand the logic of assumes in LRFD . Please clarify it me if possible. My in advance gratitude.
    H Rahimi

  • @affanahmedkhan7362
    @affanahmedkhan7362 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks

    • @SkyCiv
      @SkyCiv  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're most welcome!

  • @sixharmonieslhbf2044
    @sixharmonieslhbf2044 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I sometimes dont understand the advantage of ultimate state design over serviceability state, particularly when you notice that the ultimate stress divided by the average of the FOS equals the service stress. How do you feel and maybe I am over simplifying !

    • @SkyCiv
      @SkyCiv  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks for the question! In general it would be disadvantageous to over-simplify and use that approach, since there is a lot of statistical data that goes into the load and design factors generated for LRFD design. If you average the FOS and use that to compare LRFD and ASD effects, you are taking away the specificity of the inputs that makes up the design factors applied in LRFD.

  • @thanaamarabeh525
    @thanaamarabeh525 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot! but which is the most economic technique ASD or LRFD and why?

    • @TomBrooklyn
      @TomBrooklyn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      LRFD because it reduces overdesigns.

  • @carultch
    @carultch 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The essential difference seems to be that LRFD applies safety factors on the front-end of the calculation directly to the criteria that specifies the loads applied. ASD by contrast, applies safety-factors on the back-end, when you determine the working load at the member level, and select a member that supports this load with a safety factor. Am I correct in this understanding? Should you ultimately get the same result, regardless of which strategy you choose?
    One big problem, is any time I try to look up the safety factor required, a lot of times all I get is the definition of "safety factor". A statement of the obvious. The more important question, is how do you know what the safety factor is required to be?

    • @nathan87
      @nathan87 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, I must admit I've never been clear where the real difference in "philosophy" is at all. Surely LRFD is just a more detailed version of the same thing.

    • @thebarbarian493
      @thebarbarian493 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Check AISC-360-16 LRFD for detailed safety factors and how differentiate for each loading type and check under LRFD

    • @thebarbarian493
      @thebarbarian493 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      For your first comment i may say
      Asd decreases material stregth by factors about 1.5 and requires safety roughly 2 for joint checks While keeping loads almost as applied
      LRFD decreases material strength slightly as compared to ASD and requires 0.75 safety for joint checks
      However increase dead and live loads incredibly by 1.2DL and 1.6LL and so on....

  • @nikpatel7352
    @nikpatel7352 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think MFD is better in efficiency in legjmans

  • @sixharmonieslhbf2044
    @sixharmonieslhbf2044 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    PS dont click on the Logan bot