It quite easy to present such videos virtually and looks very attractive and interesting, but to make it physically and work the way as shown, is a totally different ball game.
I agree. In fact, the only way to move forward and get more ideas is to physically create something. Ideas tend to appear in the process of making something. You get to see all of your mistakes that way and you may correct them accordingly.
your crazy, perpetual motor engine is already proven true but only by using magnets a german engineer unveiled already and with witness of many engineers they autopsy the motor after test and it was proven true, law of thermodynamics is false the world does not want to acknowledge free energy is possible as it would make trillion dollars of losses in tax income revenue and of course crude oil and powerplants will be obsolete governments in the world will lose income tax trllions, and Oil tycoons, Rich people who own powerplants milking the poor will go out of business.
Permanent magnet loose about 1% of their energy yearly. This machine could provide free energy for everyone which is exactly why "they" will try to stifle this act of genius. Keep on keeping on brother with your genius. ;)
It looks like a good design and I don’t see any issues with the way it operates. Please complete your prototype from this design and demonstrate functionality. High marks for creativity and depth of knowledge.
This channel shows one "groundbreaking" design after the other, but only in animations, never has he shown a prototype. Which has a good reason. None of the presented designs work! With real depth of knowledge involved it should be known that it is impossible to drive a motor only with permanent magnets. Laws of nature are against it - specifically conservation of energy.
@@heinzpg - I saw that there were many, and no presented prototypes. I suspect the failure in this design is the gapping between the magnet segments. This will create resistance and prevent torque. Still, it’s an interesting design. It isn’t against nature given that the atom does continue its spin and rotation with a very high amount of energy - from where does that energy come? Is it possible with magnets (that’s quite a few interconnected atoms) - well, that’s yet to be determined. Many of the laws of thermodynamics are under question these days and I think we are inching towards some profound breakthroughs.
@@heinzpg Conservation of energy is a fallacy. "Faraday was the originator of the concept of the magnetic field, (which is described in terms of "magnetic curves" our present day "magnetic lines of force") however he never so much as suggested in his works that induced currents were a resultant of changing magnetic fields. On the contrary, he clearly associated the phenomena of electromagnetic induction with changing electrical currents. As per Maxwell, he too considered EM induction as a phenomena in which a current (or EM force) is induced in a circuit. but not as a phenomena in which a changing magnetic field causes an electrical field. He clearly said that the induced EM force is "Measured by, not caused by the changing mag field" Just as Faraday, he made no allusion to any casual link between magnetic and electric fields" "Maxwell too considered the electromagnetic induction as a phenomena in which a current is induced in a circuit, but not as a phenomena in which a changing magnetic field causes and electric field. He clearly said that the induced electromotive force is measured by, not caused by the changing magnetic field. Just as Faraday, he made no allusion to any causal link between magnetic and electric fields." "But as we've seen neither Maxwell's equations nor their solutions indicate the existence of a causal link between electric and magnetic fields. Therefore we must conclude that an electromagnetic field is a duel entity always having electric and magnetic components simultaneously created by their common sources." "A time variable electric current creates an electric field parallel to that current. The field exerts an electric force on the charge in the nearby conductors thereby creating induced electric currents in them. This in the term “electromagnetic induction” is an actually a misnomer, since no magnetic effect is involved in the phenomena, and since the induced current is caused solely by the time variable electric current and by the electric field produced by that current." "according to these equations in time variable systems electrical and magnetic fields are always created simultaneously because they have a common causative source, the changing electrical current, once created the two fields coexist from then on without any effect upon each other. Therefore electromagnetic induction is a phenomenon in which the field creates the other, I.E energy generation is an illusion. The illusion of mutual creation arises from the facts and time-dependent systems of the two fields appearing predominantly together" -Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation: A Different Approach to the Theory of Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields by Oleg D. Jefimenko In laymen's terms, this means there is no transduction of kinetic energy to electric energy, there never has been. So where does the power come from? Take a look at Steinmetz and Tesla's work and go from there.
@@derekboyt3383 Its electrons which spin. Movement of electrons mean an electrical current, and current is the source of magnetism. But you must be aware that a perpetual movement does not need any input of energy, if there is no force which opposes the movement. Likewise planets circle the sun without input of energy. And sorry, conservation of energy - which is more general than the 1st law of thermodynamics - is *not* under question. It would only be questioned if a reproduceable phenomenon would turn up which violates this law. Up to now this hasn't happened. Also, conservation of energy is in contrast to other laws of physics not only based on observations but also backed up by the Noether-proof, that laws of physics could not be time- and location-invariant without conservation of energy (and impulse). Specifically, no working magnet motor was ever shown in a credible way - although attempts to build one date back to the 13th century. But all designs have failed. Just as all attempts have failed to build a "gravitation motor" like the "Bashkara wheel".
These machines DO work. BUT they do not create energy out of nothing. The energy is taken from the magnets, where it has been put in during manufacturing. Yes, permanent magnets are not really permanent, they can wear down, if constantly loaded. Another problem in real life is that rotation speed needs to be limited by dedicated measures. In real life these machines either stop running under slightest load or disintegrate shooting their components across the room😁
@@anticorporatists9959google first law of thermodynamics I'll sum it up for you Energy can not be created or destroyed only converted from one form to another you dont have to work at Tesla to know that
It won't work, the repulsion from the same poles magnets will prevent the rotor from turning perpetually even if they're a bit apart. Any little bit of interference by the same pole magnets will eventually make the rotor stop. Cool concept to experiment with though.
Dude , I can see the extreme effort you have put into this incredible motor, the concept is sound. Any one disputing that,needs to go back to school. 👍 Good job.
Interesting idea. And for everybody who says it's "free energy", it's not. Magnets lose their field over time and with excessive use and in other extreme conditions. This is not free energy. The energy that is seen as "free" is in fact drawn from the weakening of the magnets. So yes, this design would indeed work. So instead of bashing a really interesting and creative design that is actually a solid idea and concept, how about ask more important questions such as speeds and control of, what kind of torque you'd be dealing with, especially if you want to use something like this for any heavy duty purpose. And personally, I'd be interested in various different sizes. Perhaps a smaller or larger design might be more efficient? The concepts that challenge or seem to infringe on the realm of "free energy", actually have a chance at making some remarkable breakthroughs. Why? Because eventually someone is going to come up with something that does seem to generate "free energy", because when it is first created, it may operate on principles we don't yet understand. But everything takes energy to run. Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed. So if it seems free, try stepping outside the box and thinking of different, less obvious ways that something can be generating energy from seeming nothing. And yea, I know this video is a year old, but I'm just seeing it, and it's cool as shit, and all the "flat earthers" and "free energy" junkies really need a detox back to reality. I don't recall a single time in thie entire video where "free energy" was ever mentioned. So here an idea to try and help everybody out of the whole "free energy" madness: if it seems like free energy, look at what's being used, and then go to the library or local college and crack open an engineering book or a science book, and then figure out how the thing is actually working. You might find it interesting, and hopefully educating, that way we can dispel this whole "free energy" nonsense and actually have real, meaningful conversations about things like this that can actually benefit everybody. And then maybe we can all have nice things, yea? End of rant (sorry not sorry) Otherwise, to the poster/creator, this looks awesome, please refer to the questions I asked above. Oh, and keep innovating, there's always something new to discover.
Agree, your design seems to work quite well. Keeping the magnets from repelling and attracting each other was indeed a number 1 problem when attempting to achieve that which was once thought to be clearly impossible.
It doesn't work. It's like trying to fly with your own hand pulling your hair up. External energy must be supplied to overcome deadlock. If something like this moves with or without magnets, always look for a hidden power source in the form of a battery.
@@marianpotropopescu7819 y eso? Porqué lo de su comentario vendría bien, el diseño es muy original y parece que funciona, a la espera de ver el prototipo.
There id no free energy, Looking at the machine ,why should it turn. The magnet pulls the opposite pole then it forgets it is supposed to pull and all of a sudden it lets go.
У автора этого чудо изобретения денег хватило только на анимацию. ) Ему нужны тупые инвесторы чтобы совершить "энергетическую революцию !" ) Схема развода лохов затёртая до дыр, ничего нового.
Interesting take on using magnets for a magnet powered motor. Could you install magnets 180 degrees opposite of the spinning magnets and opposite polarity to make the machine more balanced and double the power?
@@jaymschow6457 I do! Why do you think the author has presented numerous videos which such machines and often announced he would test them with a prototype, but this has never happened? These videos are classical click-baits.
@@jaymschow6457 No! What test would be possible? There is only an animation, no real system which could be tested. But a test is not necessary in this case. Laws of physics allow us in many cases to predict the outcome without an actual test.
What configuration assignment are the magnetic poles for the rotating arm and the other four magnet arms which move in and out with the motor? Very Kool Design!
what about adding an alternator and a battery . When getting near the lock position ,a alternator would kick in to get it running smoothly, only adding external boost. How would the energy bbalance look like.
i deff give you props on the creative out of the box thinking... truly, but i still think energy loss due to friction, gravity, and just the unbreakable 2nd law... would still need to input some amount of energy for it to stay running... hate being in that group, but over unity can't exist... even using magnetic bearings and bushings.. always a loss.. love the design though truly, even though i know over unity cannot be achieved, doesn't mean we (myself included) should give up... 99.999% efficiency is possible and other than a few un-used design come even close.. hate playing both sides of the fence lol but if it ever happens its gonna be crazy innovative way out in left field designs and concepts by someone who just never stopped tinkering and thinking.. props on the design
Could you use two cylinders connected with Barrens. With shelves on them facing each other where the magnet sit? Use only repelling magnets. Make the outer cylinder stationary use a lot of shelves make the cylinders long therefore the shelves longer. The outer cylinder has adjustable shelves for your on off switch.
There's a supply and demand issue,if legitimate it would probably be impossible for China to produce the demand quantity,but government will probably shut down the inventor long before that
that is an excellent invention. i would just like you to know that i notice that the engine produces much vibration because because of the unbalance magnet holder. i would like to ask further cant the engine be redesign so that the other end of the holder would hold a magnet that will attract the center magnets
I love this!! 2 things. Instead of an electric generation motor, can you attach a fan to the central shaft and create an aircraft engine? Maybe you can Crete two to operate on a 1/2 scale model 737 Max or A320XWB styled aircraft. and test it flying. Second. Using the same model aircraft idea you can mount two of these as a power plant for another motor that is the aircrafts propulsion system. So such an aircraft will have two electric fan motors and two of your power plants.
This isn't a motor. It's a very complicated and expensive coupling. Motors are devices that convert electrical energy into kinetic energy. This just inputs kinetic energy and outputs kinetic energy. If that big blue thing is a motor connected to the spinning arm input shaft, the central black eccentric shaft would be the output. There will be a significant torque to overcome for each magnet on the arm entering the small gap magnetic field. This torque will be greater than or equal to the torque provided by the magnets separating. You could get this thing spinning but friction will eventually slow it down to a stop.
We'd like to actually see this contraption operate and do useful work. Just looking at your animations I can identify at least 14 points of friction which I don't see how you can overcome to achieve over unity much less have enough power left over to do useful work. Dreams and ideas are great but so far the world has never seen any of these claims come true.
The problem is there is a huge power hassle between those magnet pieces so it would take a huge energy to move them. I tried it already. It works linearly but not in a continuous configuration. 😊 Sadly. Maybe if you mage an electromagnetic gap between the sections and power it to make the connection than flip it to cut the gap. Idea is good. Again what is the power efficiency?
This is a really good project. It looks like it could work. Unfortunately, it doesn't do that because the repulsion forces of the magnets are, although only slightly, smaller than the energy needed to pull them back. Almost perfect, but not sufficient. 😢
@@funkmonkeyfun If you knew how to read you would have opened any book on physics laws where it is clearly explained that perpetual motion is impossible.....watch fewer Harry Potter films and maybe you will understand something
I think in India should try a model, if successful, it will develop very well without fear of the US trying to sabotage it. Because India has nuclear weapons for deterrence.
I would like to show you my idea to a magnetic motor, would also like you to cad the idea so I could print it. What would you charge to make printable files?
Yes I would like to see a printable file of a small version with ceramic magnets as a proof of concept model. never mind what would someone charge maybe find a group to open source this. I believe there are such groups already. anyone have a like to such?
Neglecting friction you get zero kWh. It doesn't work. No magnet motor works, permanent magnets only give you potential energy, but never continuous energy. If you consider friction you need a small input of energy to get it rotating.
Show me a working model. As of right now. This is a battle of the force pushing the pistons VS the turning of the crank shaft, friction, Eddie currants, ect... A losing battle
Rather than trying for free energy why don’t you prove the motor works better as a high efficiency generator that can be implemented for wind or hydrodynamic turbines?
Improvement, why not add a quarter ring of magnets on the opposite side of the rotating arm ( instead of the counter balance) to attract the quarter ring out. This could double the power output
We really need a new name other than, Free energy. That many high grade magnets and machined parts aren't free and when it breaks down that won't be free ether. How about low-cost subspace electric generator.
Все эти шестерёнки тормозят крутящий момент и обороты двигателя соответственно. Проще и удобнее круглый статор и ротор как обычном двигателе тогда можно думать о мощности за счёт оборотов.
Two rings filled with charged particles, the rings being perma magnets , 8 inches wide and 4 inches thick, charged particles like electrons spin in the two rings placed high enough above and below so their fields dont interupt eachother, the charged particles accelerate around inside the ring, as fast as possible, around each ring are either a: wave guides b: more magnets direct to the space between each ring, this because as charged particles accelerate they lose energy via the form of emf emission, however via an effect known as virtual photon exchange we can direct the emf from one ring to the other, like electromagnetic pong or tennis, as a result the charged particles in each ring maintain their energy, the charged particles spin around in the magnet ring generating electricity as they go. a closed system with no moving mechanical parts at least..... solid state one may say, though temperture and radiation may be a problem.
@@masoudkowsar2922 As i said virtual photon exchange, and yes you do need source, when charged particles accelerate they emit emf, this can be absorbed to be used as energy for other charged particles, how do you think the electrons maintain themselves in atomic orbits... after these charged particles are put into the device they hopefully will not need to be replaced for a long while. Perhaps indefinitly as these do not operate through mechanincal means, but continuous exchange of emf.
This will not work, because your only looking at force in one direction, but you will have forces in both directions, which is why this motor and your piston style motors did not work, your not getting a push only on the rotating part, but your also getting a push on the magnets connected to the rods that connect to the crank, so the pressure on the shaft becomes zero, there is no net gain on this design. 🤔🧐
Holy crap this is a clever concept. I can see how this would work
It wont
It works
I see a 3D model... where is the real one really working?
I wanna see you built it lol, go ahead
@@tonyromano8337???
@@tonyromano8337
They could at least give us a simulation or use math examples showing it could work
@@earthenscience except it doesn’t work 🤷🏼♂️ friction will stop it or it will find its equilibrium…
@@tonyromano8337 probably yep
It quite easy to present such videos virtually and looks very attractive and interesting, but to make it physically and work the way as shown, is a totally different ball game.
I agree. In fact, the only way to move forward and get more ideas is to physically create something. Ideas tend to appear in the process of making something. You get to see all of your mistakes that way and you may correct them accordingly.
Whether it works, or not, it looks cool.
You need to build the real thing to see if it works other it no good
The biggest problem with free energy devices is hiding the battery
your crazy, perpetual motor engine is already proven true but only by using magnets a german engineer unveiled already and with witness of many engineers they autopsy the motor after test and it was proven true, law of thermodynamics is false the world does not want to acknowledge free energy is possible as it would make trillion dollars of losses in tax income revenue and of course crude oil and powerplants will be obsolete governments in the world will lose income tax trllions, and Oil tycoons, Rich people who own powerplants milking the poor will go out of business.
And a motor
Shush
You don’t think it’s been figured out yet?
@@timothycordial1248nothing is free
Permanent magnet loose about 1% of their energy yearly.
This machine could provide free energy for everyone which is exactly why "they" will try to stifle this act of genius.
Keep on keeping on brother with your genius.
;)
It looks like a good design and I don’t see any issues with the way it operates.
Please complete your prototype from this design and demonstrate functionality.
High marks for creativity and depth of knowledge.
This channel shows one "groundbreaking" design after the other, but only in animations, never has he shown a prototype. Which has a good reason. None of the presented designs work! With real depth of knowledge involved it should be known that it is impossible to drive a motor only with permanent magnets. Laws of nature are against it - specifically conservation of energy.
@@heinzpg - I saw that there were many, and no presented prototypes.
I suspect the failure in this design is the gapping between the magnet segments. This will create resistance and prevent torque.
Still, it’s an interesting design.
It isn’t against nature given that the atom does continue its spin and rotation with a very high amount of energy - from where does that energy come? Is it possible with magnets (that’s quite a few interconnected atoms) - well, that’s yet to be determined. Many of the laws of thermodynamics are under question these days and I think we are inching towards some profound breakthroughs.
@@heinzpg Conservation of energy is a fallacy.
"Faraday was the originator of the concept of the magnetic field, (which is described in terms of "magnetic curves" our present day "magnetic lines of force") however he never so much as suggested in his works that induced currents were a resultant of changing magnetic fields. On the contrary, he clearly associated the phenomena of electromagnetic induction with changing electrical currents. As per Maxwell, he too considered EM induction as a phenomena in which a current (or EM force) is induced in a circuit. but not as a phenomena in which a changing magnetic field causes an electrical field. He clearly said that the induced EM force is "Measured by, not caused by the changing mag field" Just as Faraday, he made no allusion to any casual link between magnetic and electric fields"
"Maxwell too considered the electromagnetic induction as a phenomena in which a current is induced in a circuit, but not as a phenomena in which a changing magnetic field causes and electric field. He clearly said that the induced electromotive force is measured by, not caused by the changing magnetic field. Just as Faraday, he made no allusion to any causal link between magnetic and electric fields."
"But as we've seen neither Maxwell's equations nor their solutions indicate the existence of a causal link between electric and magnetic fields. Therefore we must conclude that an electromagnetic field is a duel entity always having electric and magnetic components simultaneously created by their common sources."
"A time variable electric current creates an electric field parallel to that current. The field exerts an electric force on the charge in the nearby conductors thereby creating induced electric currents in them. This in the term “electromagnetic induction” is an actually a misnomer, since no magnetic effect is involved in the phenomena, and since the induced current is caused solely by the time variable electric current and by the electric field produced by that current."
"according to these equations in time variable systems electrical and magnetic fields are always created simultaneously because they have a common causative source, the changing electrical current, once created the two fields coexist from then on without any effect upon each other. Therefore electromagnetic induction is a phenomenon in which the field creates the other, I.E energy generation is an illusion. The illusion of mutual creation arises from the facts and time-dependent systems of the two fields appearing predominantly together"
-Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation: A Different Approach to the Theory of Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields by Oleg D. Jefimenko
In laymen's terms, this means there is no transduction of kinetic energy to electric energy, there never has been. So where does the power come from? Take a look at Steinmetz and Tesla's work and go from there.
@@derekboyt3383 Its electrons which spin. Movement of electrons mean an electrical current, and current is the source of magnetism. But you must be aware that a perpetual movement does not need any input of energy, if there is no force which opposes the movement. Likewise planets circle the sun without input of energy.
And sorry, conservation of energy - which is more general than the 1st law of thermodynamics - is *not* under question. It would only be questioned if a reproduceable phenomenon would turn up which violates this law. Up to now this hasn't happened. Also, conservation of energy is in contrast to other laws of physics not only based on observations but also backed up by the Noether-proof, that laws of physics could not be time- and location-invariant without conservation of energy (and impulse).
Specifically, no working magnet motor was ever shown in a credible way - although attempts to build one date back to the 13th century. But all designs have failed. Just as all attempts have failed to build a "gravitation motor" like the "Bashkara wheel".
These machines DO work. BUT they do not create energy out of nothing. The energy is taken from the magnets, where it has been put in during manufacturing. Yes, permanent magnets are not really permanent, they can wear down, if constantly loaded. Another problem in real life is that rotation speed needs to be limited by dedicated measures. In real life these machines either stop running under slightest load or disintegrate shooting their components across the room😁
You must have been really disappointed when you finally realized that this just wasn't going to work.
Due to friction, the energy required to position the magnets will always be greater than the energy attained.
So you work at tesla, don't you SMH
@@anticorporatists9959google first law of thermodynamics I'll sum it up for you
Energy can not be created or destroyed only converted from one form to another you dont have to work at Tesla to know that
Que fricción?
Como no entiendo su concepto justamente no hay fricción en este diseño, a la espera del prototipo.
It won't work, the repulsion from the same poles magnets will prevent the rotor from turning perpetually even if they're a bit apart. Any little bit of interference by the same pole magnets will eventually make the rotor stop. Cool concept to experiment with though.
Dude , I can see the extreme effort you have put into this incredible motor, the concept is sound. Any one disputing that,needs to go back to school. 👍 Good job.
Very funny😂
Interesting idea. And for everybody who says it's "free energy", it's not. Magnets lose their field over time and with excessive use and in other extreme conditions. This is not free energy. The energy that is seen as "free" is in fact drawn from the weakening of the magnets. So yes, this design would indeed work. So instead of bashing a really interesting and creative design that is actually a solid idea and concept, how about ask more important questions such as speeds and control of, what kind of torque you'd be dealing with, especially if you want to use something like this for any heavy duty purpose. And personally, I'd be interested in various different sizes. Perhaps a smaller or larger design might be more efficient?
The concepts that challenge or seem to infringe on the realm of "free energy", actually have a chance at making some remarkable breakthroughs. Why? Because eventually someone is going to come up with something that does seem to generate "free energy", because when it is first created, it may operate on principles we don't yet understand. But everything takes energy to run. Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed. So if it seems free, try stepping outside the box and thinking of different, less obvious ways that something can be generating energy from seeming nothing.
And yea, I know this video is a year old, but I'm just seeing it, and it's cool as shit, and all the "flat earthers" and "free energy" junkies really need a detox back to reality. I don't recall a single time in thie entire video where "free energy" was ever mentioned. So here an idea to try and help everybody out of the whole "free energy" madness: if it seems like free energy, look at what's being used, and then go to the library or local college and crack open an engineering book or a science book, and then figure out how the thing is actually working. You might find it interesting, and hopefully educating, that way we can dispel this whole "free energy" nonsense and actually have real, meaningful conversations about things like this that can actually benefit everybody. And then maybe we can all have nice things, yea?
End of rant (sorry not sorry)
Otherwise, to the poster/creator, this looks awesome, please refer to the questions I asked above. Oh, and keep innovating, there's always something new to discover.
Agree, your design seems to work quite well. Keeping the magnets from repelling and attracting each other was indeed a number 1 problem when attempting to achieve that which was once thought to be clearly impossible.
Very wrong concept,
It doesn't work.
Need to approach this like an SCR with its gate fully trigged but not latching on even when under a full dc load.
It doesn't work. It's like trying to fly with your own hand pulling your hair up. External energy must be supplied to overcome deadlock. If something like this moves with or without magnets, always look for a hidden power source in the form of a battery.
@@marianpotropopescu7819 y eso? Porqué lo de su comentario vendría bien, el diseño es muy original y parece que funciona, a la espera de ver el prototipo.
There id no free energy,
Looking at the machine ,why should it turn. The magnet pulls the opposite pole then it forgets it is supposed to pull and all of a sudden it lets go.
An animation can be made to do anything. Now how about a real life model with all natural physics applied and see how well that works.
У автора этого чудо изобретения денег хватило только на анимацию. ) Ему нужны тупые инвесторы чтобы совершить "энергетическую революцию !" ) Схема развода лохов затёртая до дыр, ничего нового.
if you can break the laws of thermodynamics then you prove we live in a simulation so good luck!
Interesting take on using magnets for a magnet powered motor. Could you install magnets 180 degrees opposite of the spinning magnets and opposite polarity to make the machine more balanced and double the power?
Have you test the efficiency?
How can you test the efficiency of a system, which doesn't work at all?
@@sciencefreak9070 I don't know 😂😂😂
@@jaymschow6457 I do! Why do you think the author has presented numerous videos which such machines and often announced he would test them with a prototype, but this has never happened? These videos are classical click-baits.
@@sciencefreak9070 haha that's my question, have you test?
@@jaymschow6457 No! What test would be possible? There is only an animation, no real system which could be tested. But a test is not necessary in this case. Laws of physics allow us in many cases to predict the outcome without an actual test.
How much torque output do you get?
Great invention, I want to replicate it, what kind of pixels are needed to do it? Thank you very much
what is the load capability factor, for a contraption as the one shown?
This is comedy
What configuration assignment are the magnetic poles for the rotating arm and the other four magnet arms which move in and out with the motor? Very Kool Design!
In your animation the pendulum appears to me to be running towards higher repulsion at right angles to the direction of force, which makes no sense.
this is excellent ragebait, well done
Lets play a drinking game. You have to drink everytime he says 'magnet'
what about adding an alternator and a battery . When getting near the lock position ,a alternator would kick in to get it running smoothly, only adding external boost. How would the energy bbalance look like.
i deff give you props on the creative out of the box thinking... truly, but i still think energy loss due to friction, gravity, and just the unbreakable 2nd law... would still need to input some amount of energy for it to stay running... hate being in that group, but over unity can't exist... even using magnetic bearings and bushings.. always a loss.. love the design though truly, even though i know over unity cannot be achieved, doesn't mean we (myself included) should give up... 99.999% efficiency is possible and other than a few un-used design come even close.. hate playing both sides of the fence lol but if it ever happens its gonna be crazy innovative way out in left field designs and concepts by someone who just never stopped tinkering and thinking.. props on the design
whats inside the blue barrel? and the grey box?
Could you use two cylinders connected with Barrens. With shelves on them facing each other where the magnet sit? Use only repelling magnets. Make the outer cylinder stationary use a lot of shelves make the cylinders long therefore the shelves longer. The outer cylinder has adjustable shelves for your on off switch.
Amazing idea , can't wait to see the real thing
How do you start the motor?
Great job. Worked from natural principle by connecting with nature. Thanks.
very very cool design but, unlit I see a working prototype I'll reserve my congrats ;-0
One who tries the absurd can achieve the impossible to break the boundaries of the sceptics.
That's the most logical way of seeing an actual use for such a motor. Tesla level shit man!
How Do I Buy One? Because You GOT IT no more polarity issues.
love love thank you very much ❤❤❤❤❤
Thank you ....that's brilliant idea 💡 👏
Nice concept, the magnetic magnet push the magnet and it rotate the magnet and the motor start which only use magnetic of the magnet.
CAN YOU USE SOME ECO MAGNETS , CERAM ETC ... THIS IS A TRUE ASSET TO VALUATE YOUR ENGINE , MECANIC IS POWER , YOU DID IT !
At no time will you ever break any laws of physics, only our understanding of them. This device is an extension of the TOMI that was popular in 1991
Give me one how much price
Is this for sale?
I need to buy this how does it cost?
How much is the design.
Looks like a radial or star engine, for airplane.
Brillante idea podremos ver un prototipo?
There's a supply and demand issue,if legitimate it would probably be impossible for China to produce the demand quantity,but government will probably shut down the inventor long before that
that is an excellent invention. i would just like you to know that i notice that the engine produces much vibration because because of the unbalance magnet holder. i would like to ask further cant the engine be redesign so that the other end of the holder would hold a magnet that will attract the center magnets
so where's the battery hidden?
I love this!! 2 things. Instead of an electric generation motor, can you attach a fan to the central shaft and create an aircraft engine? Maybe you can Crete two to operate on a 1/2 scale model 737 Max or A320XWB styled aircraft. and test it flying. Second. Using the same model aircraft idea you can mount two of these as a power plant for another motor that is the aircrafts propulsion system. So such an aircraft will have two electric fan motors and two of your power plants.
This isn't a motor. It's a very complicated and expensive coupling. Motors are devices that convert electrical energy into kinetic energy. This just inputs kinetic energy and outputs kinetic energy. If that big blue thing is a motor connected to the spinning arm input shaft, the central black eccentric shaft would be the output. There will be a significant torque to overcome for each magnet on the arm entering the small gap magnetic field. This torque will be greater than or equal to the torque provided by the magnets separating. You could get this thing spinning but friction will eventually slow it down to a stop.
How much is it cost?
I've got 2 designs for you. 1 static generator one dynamic to fit a shaft.
The English drive on the left, I do not know why; ....they counted Miles and Feet´s, I do not know why?
We'd like to actually see this contraption operate and do useful work. Just looking at your animations I can identify at least 14 points of friction which I don't see how you can overcome to achieve over unity much less have enough power left over to do useful work. Dreams and ideas are great but so far the world has never seen any of these claims come true.
The problem is there is a huge power hassle between those magnet pieces so it would take a huge energy to move them. I tried it already. It works linearly but not in a continuous configuration. 😊 Sadly. Maybe if you mage an electromagnetic gap between the sections and power it to make the connection than flip it to cut the gap. Idea is good. Again what is the power efficiency?
This is a really good project. It looks like it could work. Unfortunately, it doesn't do that because the repulsion forces of the magnets are, although only slightly, smaller than the energy needed to pull them back. Almost perfect, but not sufficient. 😢
It depends on design
The power output of your motor is unstated. Why?
How or what are you using for speed control? The speed is equal to cycles per second, which is normally 60.
Какая ещё скорость? Этот аппарат не будет работать в реальности. Это очередная утопия
Why insist in reciprocating motion?
It wont work in practical. Maybe you can try replacing 1st and last magnet with an iron piece on both the rotor and stator sets
why the friction it's never mentioned?
He mentions friction almost every other sentence you should listen with your ears instead of your perspective.
@@funkmonkeyfun If you knew how to read you would have opened any book on physics laws where it is clearly explained that perpetual motion is impossible.....watch fewer Harry Potter films and maybe you will understand something
There is still resistance at the seam, so it doesn't work.
The pistons not creating friction or heat and not needing lubrication is a red flag
how to buy
I want to be a member.
I think in India should try a model, if successful, it will develop very well without fear of the US trying to sabotage it. Because India has nuclear weapons for deterrence.
I would like to show you my idea to a magnetic motor, would also like you to cad the idea so I could print it. What would you charge to make printable files?
Yes I would like to see a printable file of a small version with ceramic magnets as a proof of concept model. never mind what would someone charge maybe find a group to open source this. I believe there are such groups already. anyone have a like to such?
A regular motor has two points of friction. The bearing on the ends of the rotor. This design has 13 areas of friction. I fail to see an improvement.
I only see these engines in 3D animation, and I don't see them in reality
GREAT VIDEO
ARE YOU SELLING THIS ?
HOW MANY KWH CAN THIS GENERATE ? 5 KWH OR 10KWH ?
Neglecting friction you get zero kWh. It doesn't work. No magnet motor works, permanent magnets only give you potential energy, but never continuous energy. If you consider friction you need a small input of energy to get it rotating.
Slam
I'm Working on this this project
It's possible
Thank you
Turn it the other way so you don't fight gravity ya know? I'm not sure if it would work but I'd remove the uphill drag.
Once you finish this... learn to compress a 80G file to 100 bytes. That would be just as easy as achieving this, since both are 100% impossible.
Absolutely agree concur with a happy understanding ..sign me up
Show me a working model. As of right now. This is a battle of the force pushing the pistons VS the turning of the crank shaft, friction, Eddie currants, ect... A losing battle
Rather than trying for free energy why don’t you prove the motor works better as a high efficiency generator that can be implemented for wind or hydrodynamic turbines?
سلام و خداقوت، ایده ی جالبیه👍🏻👍🏻 نمونه اولیه ای هم ساختید براش؟😀
the amount of time required to build this render could have been spent actually building a prototype.
Correct, but with a prototype you would see at once that it doesn't work. And I suspect that the author even knows that his designs don't work.
Improvement, why not add a quarter ring of magnets on the opposite side of the rotating arm ( instead of the counter balance) to attract the quarter ring out. This could double the power output
Se bloquea quedaría en equilibrio?
Nice vidio.....
Muy bueno. funciona?
В этой конструкции магнитного двигателя много трущихся элементов. Лучше применять двигатель Перендева.
Where get the outer magnetic Rotor the frequently needed impulse not to act as a pendulum after time? Nice rendered and animated,. but would not work.
Hmm, will lthis really work ?? Too many mechanical problems in my view.. hmm..
💤 - really great animation but it won't free run. When you crack this you won't be advertising it until your a billionaire!
Post the amount of Watt hours that was harvested, if any. Otherwise, it is just a vaporware aka snake oil and nothing else Nada, Zilch.
We really need a new name other than, Free energy. That many high grade magnets and machined parts aren't free and when it breaks down that won't be free ether. How about low-cost subspace electric generator.
Все эти шестерёнки тормозят крутящий момент и обороты двигателя соответственно. Проще и удобнее круглый статор и ротор как обычном двигателе тогда можно думать о мощности за счёт оборотов.
The concept is beautiful but i doubt that works
Very similar to my designs back in 208
Damn that is 100s of years ago
Very nice looking animation….
But then again, so is avatar ………..!
Two rings filled with charged particles, the rings being perma magnets , 8 inches wide and 4 inches thick, charged particles like electrons spin in the two rings placed high enough above and below so their fields dont interupt eachother, the charged particles accelerate around inside the ring, as fast as possible, around each ring are either a: wave guides b: more magnets direct to the space between each ring, this because as charged particles accelerate they lose energy via the form of emf emission, however via an effect known as virtual photon exchange we can direct the emf from one ring to the other, like electromagnetic pong or tennis, as a result the charged particles in each ring maintain their energy, the charged particles spin around in the magnet ring generating electricity as they go. a closed system with no moving mechanical parts at least..... solid state one may say, though temperture and radiation may be a problem.
Nice words, where do you get charged particles from.
Are they permanently charged ???
@@masoudkowsar2922 As i said virtual photon exchange, and yes you do need source, when charged particles accelerate they emit emf, this can be absorbed to be used as energy for other charged particles, how do you think the electrons maintain themselves in atomic orbits... after these charged particles are put into the device they hopefully will not need to be replaced for a long while. Perhaps indefinitly as these do not operate through mechanincal means, but continuous exchange of emf.
CAD and CGI run on electricity. Its not a prototype.
thanks man
This will not work, because your only looking at force in one direction, but you will have forces in both directions, which is why this motor and your piston style motors did not work, your not getting a push only on the rotating part, but your also getting a push on the magnets connected to the rods that connect to the crank, so the pressure on the shaft becomes zero, there is no net gain on this design. 🤔🧐
I see one problem that will make this design inoperable that you missed. Think about it.