Im trying to buy one after 1 month Audi a6 3.0 tdi v6 233 or 240. What do you think of it? are them good? now i have Audi a4 2.5 tdi 2003 161hp ( Automatic ) but i will sell it because Alot of people say that they are not Reliable, so now im looking for audi a6 3.0 tdi
@@Slasher744 im from North Macedonia we dont pay this Tax, But im jusf asking about the car Some.people say. 2.7 tdi is better is more reliable than 3.0 tdi
Not long. Almost a year or so. The chain in engine went to hell and i decided to sell it. Now i am driving Kuga mk2 but its shit comparing to A6. The chain itself was sketchy from beggining i dont know when previous ownwrs change it.
@@surena9451 i dont even know previous owner. He was only car salseman deal was super sketchy. There was a leak from oring in engine. But the chain itself was workig good when i bought it.
I think the 3.2 has it's issues well known so you can loop them up and find a car which has those issues fixed. The 2.8 FSi and 3.0 TFSI are about the same engine in a sense. The chain system for example is well known and you can find a car that has that replaced. It's fuel consumption is also comparable to the 2.4 while being more powerful (the 2.4 is just greedy for fuel but doesn't give much back in terms of performance I would say), The difference from 2.4 to 3.2 power wise is quite a big jump even though the numbers on paper aren't that far apart. I mean going from 3.2 to 4.2 V8 wasn't the same huge jump for my feeling. In fact it felt a lot the same in daily use in sport mode. The 2.4 is most reliable because it doesn't have direct injection so it won't carbon buildup on the valves. It also doesn't have a turbo, so no forced induction related issues. However depending on how the previous owners have (ab)used the car it can have oil burning issues. It has not much power so most would rev the engine out completely when spirited driving. I have bad memories with my older 2.4 burning oil like mad, but it sounded cooler than my current 3.2 when you did rev it out to 7k. And yes, the 2.4 also has chain issues. Most if not all VAG engines do (even diesels like 3.0TDI) cuz VAG can't build good chain systems for some reason. 2.0 TFSI is worst of them all. You can expect both direct injection related issues AND forced induction related issues (turbo). Oil consumption can also get out of hand quickly, to the point you fill with gas and oil at the same time. I think there was also a specific problem with the camshaft follower in this specific engine. This car afaik has a timing belt so no chain issue but yeah... If I were you I would find a good maintained and fixed up 3.2FSi, preferably with quattro and NOT the multitronic. It can be cool and maybe save 1% on fuel but the quattro tiptronic is much more reliable than the multitronic. Manual transmission is best, only the clutch is most likely to be worn but having to shift yourself doesn't really fit in a luxury comfort car imho.
I have one too, it's the B7 A4 2005, absolutely fantastic car, amazing engine, underrated performance and sounds unbelievable. I would go ahead and get one.
@@64siskat96 well, you should consider that it will literally eat your wallet. Like the amount of fuel that fucking 3.2FSI smokes is just astonishing. I have ine and i love every bit of it. But i have also come to realize that renting a car+fuelling that is cheaper than to run my own 3.2 A6. So take that into consideration and dont buy high mileage ones
I am thinking of buying an Audi A6 2.0 tdi or 2.7 tdi, or 3.0 tdi, between the 160,000 / 190,000 milleage (kms) from 2004 to 2009. I travel, on average, 8,500 km per year. Is this car reliable and am I making a good choice?
@@veljkootasevic7945 I'm thinking on buying this one. What do you think ? www.standvirtual.com/anuncio/audi-a6-3-0-tdi-v6-quattro-tiptronic-ID8OSY51.html#21d181e3df
Audi's 6 cylinders are underrated. 🏁
Diesel4ever!
3.0 TDI is fully OK for this car.
I had Touareg 4.2 TDI, that made 5.8 sec.
One of the best engines ever!
Yes 3.0 and 4.2 diesels pulls like tractor🥰
Lovely sound of the 170hp 2.0tdi
i know had one
I have it too , 2.0 tdi caha
Thank you for this!
The 3.0 TFSI is underrated
3.0 v6 tdi 233/240 are the best, economical ,reliable and fast
Reliable? Especially: timming chains, injectors, AT - very cheap & easy in to repair/replace 👍
Got one with stage 2. Can't fault it apart from door actuators.
Im trying to buy one after 1 month
Audi a6 3.0 tdi v6 233 or 240.
What do you think of it? are them good?
now i have
Audi a4 2.5 tdi 2003 161hp ( Automatic ) but i will sell it because Alot of people say that they are not Reliable, so now im looking for audi a6 3.0 tdi
Yes if you are not living in netherlnds. 500 eu tax for 3 months. Just because its a diesel.
@@Slasher744 im from North Macedonia we dont pay this Tax,
But im jusf asking about the car
Some.people say.
2.7 tdi is better is more reliable than 3.0 tdi
I am driving 3.2 fsi. Wirks great with quattro.
It was great auto but i am not paying 2500 eu for engine chain
@@Slasher744 How long did it last?
Not long. Almost a year or so. The chain in engine went to hell and i decided to sell it. Now i am driving Kuga mk2 but its shit comparing to A6.
The chain itself was sketchy from beggining i dont know when previous ownwrs change it.
@@Slasher744 was the chain not replaced by previous owner when you bought it? With sketchy you mean rattling at cold start?
@@surena9451 i dont even know previous owner. He was only car salseman deal was super sketchy. There was a leak from oring in engine. But the chain itself was workig good when i bought it.
RS6 😱😱😱😱😁😁😁
the 2.7 tdi was on drive and not on sport bruh
Bmk 225hp Good motorisation
I want to buy audi a6 C6 2004-2007 which one is the best the one with less problems. 2.0 tfsi or 2.4 or 3.2?
I think the 3.2 has it's issues well known so you can loop them up and find a car which has those issues fixed. The 2.8 FSi and 3.0 TFSI are about the same engine in a sense. The chain system for example is well known and you can find a car that has that replaced. It's fuel consumption is also comparable to the 2.4 while being more powerful (the 2.4 is just greedy for fuel but doesn't give much back in terms of performance I would say), The difference from 2.4 to 3.2 power wise is quite a big jump even though the numbers on paper aren't that far apart. I mean going from 3.2 to 4.2 V8 wasn't the same huge jump for my feeling. In fact it felt a lot the same in daily use in sport mode.
The 2.4 is most reliable because it doesn't have direct injection so it won't carbon buildup on the valves. It also doesn't have a turbo, so no forced induction related issues. However depending on how the previous owners have (ab)used the car it can have oil burning issues. It has not much power so most would rev the engine out completely when spirited driving. I have bad memories with my older 2.4 burning oil like mad, but it sounded cooler than my current 3.2 when you did rev it out to 7k. And yes, the 2.4 also has chain issues. Most if not all VAG engines do (even diesels like 3.0TDI) cuz VAG can't build good chain systems for some reason.
2.0 TFSI is worst of them all. You can expect both direct injection related issues AND forced induction related issues (turbo). Oil consumption can also get out of hand quickly, to the point you fill with gas and oil at the same time. I think there was also a specific problem with the camshaft follower in this specific engine. This car afaik has a timing belt so no chain issue but yeah...
If I were you I would find a good maintained and fixed up 3.2FSi, preferably with quattro and NOT the multitronic. It can be cool and maybe save 1% on fuel but the quattro tiptronic is much more reliable than the multitronic. Manual transmission is best, only the clutch is most likely to be worn but having to shift yourself doesn't really fit in a luxury comfort car imho.
I have the 3.2 fsi 😁
give me your advice pls. Soon I will have a 3.2 v6 Quattro fsi
I have one too, it's the B7 A4 2005, absolutely fantastic car, amazing engine, underrated performance and sounds unbelievable. I would go ahead and get one.
theres an offer for a 3.5k a6 fsi 3.2 2005 should i buy it as my first car,
@@64siskat96 well, you should consider that it will literally eat your wallet. Like the amount of fuel that fucking 3.2FSI smokes is just astonishing. I have ine and i love every bit of it. But i have also come to realize that renting a car+fuelling that is cheaper than to run my own 3.2 A6. So take that into consideration and dont buy high mileage ones
@@Apoindeed aight thanks homie
I am thinking of buying an Audi A6 2.0 tdi or 2.7 tdi, or 3.0 tdi, between the 160,000 / 190,000 milleage (kms) from 2004 to 2009. I travel, on average, 8,500 km per year. Is this car reliable and am I making a good choice?
Yeah! Used to own a 260HP Audi A6 3.0 TDI, and i can say it's a pretty reliable and a very awesome car.
@@veljkootasevic7945 Thank's a lot ! Greetings from the land of Miguel Oliveira ( moto GP)..
@@veljkootasevic7945 I'm thinking on buying this one. What do you think ?
www.standvirtual.com/anuncio/audi-a6-3-0-tdi-v6-quattro-tiptronic-ID8OSY51.html#21d181e3df
Not worth, take some petrol model 2.8 or 3.2fsi, y travel 50.000 and i use a petrol engine, its a way better
No! For 8500 km a year you are better of with a petrol engine. Diesel can create a lot of problems with EGR DPF, turbo and so much more
2.0 TDi 170Hp).
That was great.
3:48 i think that is not only 580hp :)))
That’s not.the video is of a 720 hp tuned rs6
It is 720HP
Nice video!
I really appreciate your work
3.0 BBJ?
Дизелёк практичнее!!!
3.0 TDI 176 kW 💪💪💪
CDYA is the power!
4.2 fsi 👌👌
2,4👍👍👍👍👍
Slėgio daviklis
Что тупит она на 4.2 Пассат Р36 3.6 300 лс сотку за 5.5 секунд набирает а тут за 6
Ну так он на 300кг легче
Понятно, что будет лучше разгон
Last one didn t have it in sport
💣💣💣💣💣💥💥💥💥💥👍👍👍👍👍
I got 2.7TDI😁
Did anyone see lana del rey there? :))
The first one made 11 seconds not 8
9