Formal Charge vs Oxidation Number Made Super Simple with Examples Chemistry MCAT

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 มิ.ย. 2020
  • In the last example, the phosphates are supposed to be +10... I accidentally wrote down -10

ความคิดเห็น • 14

  • @WernTheDRUID
    @WernTheDRUID ปีที่แล้ว +5

    And i thought KhanAcademy was the easiest to learn from! Thank you for explaining everything so well! + the common misconceptions

  • @Tulwar345
    @Tulwar345 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Your videos are incredibly helpful and informative and you make this stuff so easy to understand. Thanks a million!

  • @rebekahjohnson329
    @rebekahjohnson329 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just want to say I really appreciate your videos!!

  • @PattonN
    @PattonN 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was sooo helpful! Thank you!!

  • @khushalimashruwala7231
    @khushalimashruwala7231 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    At 9:15, for the two carbons that are methyl groups off of that middle carbon, would their oxidation numbers be -3 each since they "win" against the hydrogens?

  • @allenramollari9418
    @allenramollari9418 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    At 19:58 it should be positive 10 correct? Not negative since +5 * 2 is +10 and since we need -2 & O is -14 and H is +2

    • @sciencesimplified3890
      @sciencesimplified3890  3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Ah yes you’re correct. It is + 10 like you’re saying not -10... I really hope from the viewers perspective that was obvious it’s hard for me to gauge that from the creators perspective...

    • @allenramollari9418
      @allenramollari9418 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@sciencesimplified3890 no worries! Thanks for taking your time to make the video!

    • @hosamhadid5972
      @hosamhadid5972 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@sciencesimplified3890 If the viewer is following along, then they'll know it's +10. :) Thank you for all your hard work!

    • @sciencesimplified3890
      @sciencesimplified3890  3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Haha thank you for that actually I really appreciate that comment

  • @ilanbocian1291
    @ilanbocian1291 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    5:54 = Discussion Re Oxidation Number

  • @Dragonquest1385
    @Dragonquest1385 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for your videos! Feel like the way you break up the videos is a lot more digestible and less daunting than some 3 hour long videos

  • @paololarocca8732
    @paololarocca8732 ปีที่แล้ว

    can we study mechanism of organic reaction using the oxidation number instead of formal charge? i know it can be useless but it would be cool to have to different point of view in describing the same thing

  • @zazzawi0099
    @zazzawi0099 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    so in summary:
    FORMAL CHARGE FC = #Ve in periodic table - #Ve it has in compound (include bonds/ Ve)
    Oxidation # = number of tug of way it won (- for winner) (only count bonds NOT valence e)
    I hope I summarized it right, thank you A TON!