I'm leaning towards a Primary Arms micro prism 1x with the Gemini ACSS reticle for my Beretta CX4 PCC in 9mm. Light weight. Relatively low cost. Great battery life. Great reticle. Great illumination. Etched reticle, as a backup, if electronic elements fail.
Nice discussion on red-dots...basically comes down to what works for the individual shooter. But the one constant is all these guys have "Tactical Beards."
I decided on a HOLOSUN AEMS enclosed sight for my upgraded RUGER PC chassis carbine (16" barrel). This circle/dot reticle is absolutely my favorite for many reasons, speed of target acquisition is one of them. It was necessary to add a MAGPUL 1/4" high snap-on cheekpiece to get perfect eye-to-reticle alignment with my cheek weld.
11:37 “sometimes I like to shoot with a red dot, and sometimes I like to shoot with a green dot. I’m not going to change my optic like a peasant.” At least that’s the only reason I can think he’d have two of the same dots on his gun. But I’m not in the PCC competition world.
I have a JP 16” 9mm barrel and my groups are 6-7” at 100 yards. That’s with a 10x scope. Seems too big of a group. Same scope on a ar15 I get 1” or less. What kind of groups could be considered expected with 9mm barrel
@@SeaNNyTizzle 1.93 is definitely the way to go for night vision, but I feel like lower 1/3 is a perfect all arounder. It's way easier to get behind lower 1/3 than absolute while standing, but it's also way easier to get behind lower 1/3 than 1.93 while prone.
I did a exps2 for a while on an akv. Works great but I felt it was too much optic for it and its bulky. Put that on an ar15. Nothing wrong with going that route though if that's what you have. Military runs them on apc9's n mp5's for anyone who thinks it's not practical.
I'm leaning towards a Primary Arms micro prism 1x with the Gemini ACSS reticle for my Beretta CX4 PCC in 9mm. Light weight. Relatively low cost. Great battery life. Great reticle. Great illumination. Etched reticle, as a backup, if electronic elements fail.
Nice discussion on red-dots...basically comes down to what works for the individual shooter. But the one constant is all these guys have "Tactical Beards."
I decided on a HOLOSUN AEMS enclosed sight for my upgraded RUGER PC chassis carbine (16" barrel). This circle/dot reticle is absolutely my favorite for many reasons, speed of target acquisition is one of them.
It was necessary to add a MAGPUL 1/4" high snap-on cheekpiece to get perfect eye-to-reticle alignment with my cheek weld.
Very informative! Thank you from a new JP-5 shooter.
Practice is key for finding it every time
Need more close-up shots of each set up as you talk.
Absolutely
4 years ago guys.... Great topic for an update video! (because we can trust you all 😉)
I'm gonna be weird and run a vortex db 1.75-5x32 as my main and a sig romeo 5 on a 45 degree offset on a CA9MM
11:37 “sometimes I like to shoot with a red dot, and sometimes I like to shoot with a green dot. I’m not going to change my optic like a peasant.” At least that’s the only reason I can think he’d have two of the same dots on his gun. But I’m not in the PCC competition world.
I’m using the New Viridian GDO 30… it’s incredible…
510c is a excellent optic.
Just picked that and a 507 up today
This video really could have used up close shots of their actual reticles
JP for the 45 deg.mount, got it. What were the main mounts?
I have a JP 16” 9mm barrel and my groups are 6-7” at 100 yards. That’s with a 10x scope. Seems too big of a group. Same scope on a ar15 I get 1” or less. What kind of groups could be considered expected with 9mm barrel
For home defense and duty would a closed system like a T2 be preferred?
It’s like 3 curlies and 1 moe
Josh has the manliest beard in all of manhood.
cringe
1596 Deckow Lodge
My bros! 10 mm auto and im in 🤘
Ew why would anyone want to shoot that in competition? It’s not a comp round
What is the general thoughts behind primary dot height? Low base, absolute cowitness, lower 1/3rd height, 1.93" mounts?
Lower 1/3 is the way to go.
I prefer 1.93 as long as the stock has a cheek riser. Even without one you will be alright.
@@SeaNNyTizzle 1.93 is definitely the way to go for night vision, but I feel like lower 1/3 is a perfect all arounder. It's way easier to get behind lower 1/3 than absolute while standing, but it's also way easier to get behind lower 1/3 than 1.93 while prone.
pcc's are so underrated
Anyone ever use the Eotech for PCC?
I took a look at them - didn’t like the pixilated reticle
@@TheRealPewPanda I agree. I love the size and shape of the window and the reticles, but the pixels can be distracting.
@@steveg3593 agree! Allegedly the pixilation is a feature to make you look past and not on it but.. meh makes it look antiquated IMO.
Yeah fudds
I did a exps2 for a while on an akv. Works great but I felt it was too much optic for it and its bulky. Put that on an ar15. Nothing wrong with going that route though if that's what you have. Military runs them on apc9's n mp5's for anyone who thinks it's not practical.
Screw optics...let's talk beard Maintenance
Does that dude have grease on his tats. If so man he's gonna catch flack.