jajajajaja!!!!, Un "país" real seria si no viviece de la pirateria "hombre", jajajaja, andaaaaa, son piratas ustedes!; asi todo han firmado 4 rendiciones incondicionales, 4 veces rechazo Argentina invasiones inglesas, y si queres te digo los años, las fechas, andaaaaa.... "País" enserio, que no pueden derrotar aun "País" del octavo mundo bananero como el nuestro, son una verguenza ustedes!, suerte con en Brexit y la Union Europea!, ah!... y con Rusia tambien. Saludos Pirata!.
Just like in Scotland, the animals are eating everything. Without the deer in Scotland there would be scrubs and trees, without the many sheep there would be vegetation in the Falklands. The Faroe Islands has the same issue, bare hills because of too many sheep eating everything.
I served on the Island for a year starting from April 78. We lived in an old hut which had been lane derelict for 30 years until the Royal marines chamferred it up to live in. Absolutely no money was put into a proposed new barracks which was wished to be sited near the airport along with a plan to quickly blow up the airfield with pre-planned and readied mines. Billions of dollars later...........and I had an extra visit in 82.
The top layers of tarmac were first applied (1985/86) to a very deep dry lean (concrete) base of the main and secondary runways of Mount Pleasant Airport. This is not to be confused with the very much smaller airport at Port Stanley some 30 miles or so from here. No airport here is named after Shackleton, that was the name given to the resurfacing and refurbishing project which this video depicts. The asphalt was presumably relaid because the old tarmac was 25 years old and worn, and the landing lights, hydraulic arrestor gear and power and fibre optic cable replaced or re-routed to suit new technology. The concrete base will probably be good for 100+ years, it’s the tarmac that wears out. The materials would have been driven by lorry from the harbour to the airfield about 8 miles away. (I worked on the original).
I was there in 1984 on the Chinooks, we were based out at Kelly's Garden (San Carlos). WE kept them flying in all weathes delivering ONE container at a time to get them started at MP! I worked on the mighty VC10 many moons ago and it pleased me to see them still flying then from the airport, but sadly now they replaced them with some crap aircraft! Loved it down there, I would love to go back but i retire in a few years and Im no millionaire so doubt I'll ever see the Islands again. We got there on a troop ship and came home on SS UGANDA a gem of a ship sadly she is now long gone too. All the best to the forces in the Falklands!
I recall reading in some Falkland Islands Government literature some years ago that the people can emigrate from Britain to the the Islands as long as they have useful skills or want to establish a business.
Man I landed here in 1989 for a 6 month tour, 6 months later America, 4 months later Desert Storm, 6 months later Belfast, 1 year later Bosnia 6 months later Canada and 1 year later I was retired and moving to Canada 😎😎😎 28 years later I’m an old man 🤣🤣🤣 since been to all of the USA, China, Korea and India with work. Be nice to travel nowhere
I’d like to thank the veterans and those that gave their lives during this conflict, also I’d like to thank the Argentine Junta under Galtieri for helping Britain to get it’s shit together over the Falklands. Gracias.
@@paulc2130 I suppose you need me to spoon feed you the explanation of what government international non official geopolitical projects and goals are. Get out of the way please, if you got nothing to say, but condescending put downs (as usual)
They should build a road network. It doesn't have to be extensive, but something that will connect and link the various outlying areas. They can use natural resources such as hard rock, ballast and volcanic clay already existing on the islands.
Andersons Road you could have said that in 1833 when the English returned to the island and setup shop pemtnanently. The people are Englishmen through and through.
@@kcimb Whatever the historical arguments are it part of the UK now by force of arms. The UK is demonstrably ready to kill to keep it question is are the bean eaters willing to die trying to take it.......
Colas, what a wonderful piece of publicity, well done. In my ignorance I did not know the new airfield was dedicated to Shackleton, so thank you for educating a 60+ year old Prior to this I was watching a video of RN Phantoms "burning up" the US Saratoga flight deck, quite literary.
It's strange that they didn't say what they were actually doing, but it was just resurfacing the runway at Mount Pleasant. www.ceequal.com/case-studies/project-shackleton-falkland-islands-runway-resurfacing-project/
@@enzoborettini8252 Your NAVAL FLEET?? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Biggest laugh of the week. Your submarines run on Diesel and blow up killing your naval crews. Meanwhile our nuclear powered Astute class subs can HEAR every single ship that leaves the shore in Argentina....all the way from the Falklands!!! Your NAVAL FORCE won't get far this time matey. You will find the ships are sinking before you have even found your bunks!!
@Gar Si Sr, de la ONU!. siguen siendo COLONIA si estan bajo bandera britanica, si se independizan unicamente serian un país pero si siguen bajo en manto britanico...
@@jwadaow eso todavia queda a determinar hermano... Lamentablemente, la ONU exige sentarse al Reino Unido y negociar con Argentina, sinceramente me gustaria que termine esta guerra que no termino y que algun dia las Falklands o Malvinas sean un pais independiente del Reino Unido y de Argentina, del continente Americano, como lo son Canada, Australia, Nueva Zelanda, etc. Es mi mas sincera opinion hermano. Saludos.
Nada nada que ver , ese aeropuerto es un aeropuerto basico de doble uso , implican mas gastos y retrasos las bases militares ARGENTINAS estan hechas especificamente solo para uso militar o de exportacion. Ah y para tu mente que se quedo retrasada en 1982 , Chile y Argentina somos aliados y Chile apoya la soberania argentina en Malvinas.Saludos
@@gabyfromhell1 pero este oasillo tiene más de 3.000 islas ,incluso la más lejana es RAPA NUI🗿🗿🗿y está a 3.765 kms y es de CHILE ,las falklands islands están a pocos 600 kms y son de tus padres ingleses, recuerda "LOS COBARDES SE RINDEN EN SU PROPIA CASA " Y LOS VIOLAN 👉👌🥺🥺🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Robando son experto. Igual disfruta del ají Falkland en donde tu sabes, gauchito poto pelado. Te dejamos sin isla, Chile e Inglaterra aliados por siempre.
No they aren’t I live in the Falklands, fuck off baddy, you are sad about loosing a war that happened 40 years ago grow and move on, we want to remain British
@@flycan641 put you flag on the island for more then five years and as well as get the land owners of the, "Falkland islands". To agreeing to becoming Argentina. Then maybe then you can claim the island's.
@@j.4354 If you mean the last dictatorship, it was from 1976 to 1983, which does not take away our right to claim for our territory, usurped in 1833 by the United Kingdom, we all know that the Malvinas are Argentine, and that the British position is merely imperialist and military strategist should give you shame!
Argentina's militaty is in even worse shape now than it was in 82. What exactly do you expect to accomplish? How many times do the Brits have to teach you this lesson?
@@juandemalvinas Didn't the inhabitants vote to remain in Commonwealth? Also the only reason the junta invaded the FALKLANDS was to gain popularity for their illegal regime. However, if you're willing to try again with Argentina's bad economy and underfunded and understaffed military you'll find her majesties armed forces ready to receive you.
And the Irish will get back Northern Ireland when we leave, the Scottish will leave and rejoin the EU. And Great Britain the United Kingdom will be no more Brexiteers are the real traitors.
By staying with France and Netherlands and other states with overseas territories in the EU has actually made them vote in favour of UK rule over the islands.. by leaving the EU they could theoretically turn against us in the UN as they kinda have started to do with the Chaigos Islands issue.. that said if Jeremy Corbyn wins he would leave every colony UK has but that has nothing to do with the EU.
Es triste ver como mientras los Ingleses y Kelpers progresan construyendo en las Islas en continente los políticos de turno se la pasan en disputas por poder, dinero, clientelismo y el país teniendolo todo no avanza. Un ejemplo salta a la vista, en las Islas estan proyectando la pavimentación haciendo rutas y calles con material de construcción de primera calidad, mientras tanto en las provincias patagónicas no te levantan una ciudad un aeropuerto o un nuevo puerto ni por chiste porque no solo están en la pelea política de ver quien se la lleva mejor sino que nunca hay preusupuesto o el del partido tal se lo traba rn el congreso al del otro partido y también que por ejemplo en la provincia de Buenos Aires si un intendente manda a hacer una obra es un bacheo de mala calidad o calles que de un año para otro terminan requesbrajadas partidas llenas de pozos porque inflan un presupuesto por un valor cuando el coste de los materiales usados son bajos dada la baja calidad, conclusión pasan un presupuesto por un número, compran por uno inferior y se quedan con el vuelto y las calles parecen sacadas de un paisaje lunar. Así no se puede progresar, así no podemos cambiar de mentalidad, uno puede pedir y decir que las Malvinas son Argentinas pero la verdad y la realidad va a ser que en un futuro nos vamos a quedar azorados con las frases en la boca porque del otro lado vamos a ver algo tan insuperable que nunca podremos alcanzar. Esa es la verdad. Lo lamento por mi país Argentina al que amo con mi vida.
Que bueno tienen todo un ejército completo más armamento de largo alcance aaaaa pero nosotros no podemos tener lo mismo porque su papi Norteamérica se enoja. Siempre el padre cuidando y limpiándole el culo al hijo. Pero bueno así están las cosas por algo en las películas siempre salen como piratas es lamentable
@@ellibanes7153 Only in your dreams....until you wake up for a piss!! Argentina can't even get its shit together at HOME never mind some islands hundreds of miles away!!
Las Islas Malvinas, Georgias y Sandwich del sur, todo su mar adyacente, plataforma submarina y porción antartica ¡¡¡ FUERON, SON Y SERÁN SIEMPRE ARGENTINAS !!!
@Gar Sorry about your misinformed belief, but NO. It is known that Britain was NOT the first to sight or land on the Islands, the possibilities are a few, including that of Piti Reis they Turkish commander, it is possible that the British were the first to set foot or sail into the canal, as well as not the first. But the Dutch are who are believed to have discovered the Islands and named them. The French were the first ones to build a settlement which is ultimately the only thing that really counts. The Spanish then made justice on their original territorial claim and officially bought whatever rights the French had earned, which entitled them to kick the British off the Western Island. And 2, by the time Britain "lay its unlawful claim", they were already Spanish Territory, in fact the British knew this and thought they could try to get away with sneaking in Port Egmont anyways, and yet eventually yielded back to Spain and abandoned Port Egmont. In fact evidence of a robbing policy is the fact that they never went back to Port Egmont, but took the Islands from the Argentine on the Eastern Island which they had never set foot on. The British left as always antagonistically, because all they've ever done in this world is bring discord fight and war to the peaceful existence of people. While Spain was at that point still in the process of civilizing the old world giving equal rights under god to all people in conquered. Very different to how Britain treated its colonized subjects it would put to work for his Majesty, take their resources and managed the business "their way" through slaves and so forth. Spain did not have "colonies," that word comes from English History. Spain made province type autonomous territories often with local governors. The Southern Cone and Malvinas was part of the Viceroyalty of the River Plate, with capital in BUENOS AIRES. We had the strongest world currency, and Britain basically was jealous and wanted to undermine and have all that Spain had earned. The Viceroyalty, became the United Provinces with capital in BUENOS AIRES, and the United Provinces became Argentina with capital, Buenos Aires. When Spain retreated in 1811 from the Malvinas because of Argentina, Argentina rightfully inherited its abandoned territories through its victory. No one in South America contests that, that's why they all support the Argentine claim (unless they want to kiss the IMF, the U.S. or U.K.'s ass. Britain did not seize the Islands upon Spain's retreat, it waited for the right contextual situation, lied to Argentina like a thief about being its ally, while it forcefully removed the Islands Argentinian loyal occupants during a key moment of weakness caused by ... no other than the U.S. pirate attack on Puerto Soledad. Why? Because they did not want laws and rules, they wanted to scavenge. The U.S. and U.K. are famous for tag team robbing territories, like they did with Diego Garcia, the Virgin Islands and other Caribbean "situations". It looks to me you have been exclusively educated by the British propagandist narrative taught to the British people and the Islanders; because you seem to know nothing other that what concerns Britain's convenient version of events, though self servingly false it may be. Like what is currently taught about WW2, "my little savoir of the world, liberator of the Jews hero" LOL lol In fact, the English language is today definitely the greatest producer of lies in human history out of all the world's literary history, and people in both America and the England are both starting to admit that. Luckily. Unfortunately uncovering the unforgivable truth of the millions both our countries have murdered in order to control AND USE the world. You don't actually believe Galtieri was stupid enough to go straight into a losing war do you? You do, don't you? Just like you believe Britain came reaaaaaallyyy close to not winning that war. LOL Perhaps ... caring more about your own education would be my advice to you.
Patrick Edgar Regini - The problem with that argument is that when Argentina tried to assert control over the islands, they captured South Georgia. There is zero Argentine or Spanish history in South Georgia to support an Argentine claim. South Georgia history is 100% British until the 1982 invasion. It all comes down to this: Argentina tried to take territory from the UK by force, thinking nothing could be done about it. The result was war, in which Argentina was soundly defeated. That settles the matter, as far as I am concerned. If Argentina ever attacks again, I hope the UK will have the means and the will to destroy every military base in Argentina. I would rather there was peace. That will come when Argentina formally relinquishes their phony claims.
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini Well just take a look at the counties left behind from UK-SPANISH colonialism..... UK = USA , CANADA, AUSTRALIA, NEW ZEALAND. SPAIN = Corrupt shitholes.
@@pablolasowski2831 Es una tragedia terrible la forma en que los argentinos, un buen pueblo, han sido adoctrinados para ver a las Malvinas como territorio esencial. Los británicos solo quieren dejar a los kelpers para vivir sus vidas, pero la agresión y la actitud colonial significa que estos trabajos son necesarios para proteger a estas personas pacíficas que no amenazan a nadie.
Jimmy Hill's Chin puede que las personas sean pacíficas, pero las verdaderas personas pacíficas dueñas de ese territorio fueron asesinadas por los ingleses y los Kelpers que ves como pacificos no son mas que una semilla que aseguró a UK las islas.
@@joaquin2966 La dominación española en América del Sur estaba asegurada por ríos de sangre. Comparado con esto, lo que sucedió en las Malvinas no es nada.
they are home.love britain.god save the queen .falkland islanders we have your backs.by the way argentina you owe the uk money for the 1982 war you waged.
Lmao, on the subject of rats, how about all those drowned rats on the Belgrano? Biggest loss of life in the entire war 😂 Look forward to Argentina's second invasion, you may have lied about how many of you died last time, but I look forward to hearing about more of you dying next time. I wonder who screamed louder, the cowards that the gurkhas slowly cut to pieces with their knives, or the whore mothers of the Argie soldiers when they found out their spawn had died 😂😘
@UC47ffkI5n1OlDjzThXVXVvg We should be angry, in fact Argentina is not angry enough in my opinion. This is a conflict that has to do with the world's countries honoring and respecting each other as equal nations entitled to the same mature acknowledgment of every issue that would be important to ones own nation. When you stop reading only British sourced material, and learn what actually happened on the Falkland Malvinas Islands, not the narrative the English language consciously has been disseminating and indirectly educating the world with, you see that there is indeed a strong argument on behalf of Argentina in terms of them having had earned greater sovereignty right to the islands by 1820 than Britain possessed at that point, by political definition. However Britain, as it considers its wishes and wants above any notion of respect and equality among the nations the world, has always used its far greater wealth and military power to incur invade meddle with and intervene in South America (and the world) in particular Argentina. ...I bet you have no idea how many military incursions Britain carried out against Argentina throughout history. Britain knew Argentina had a strong case in 1833 for the islands now being rightfully belonging to their administration, but instead of arguing and settling with them by recognizing Argentina's case and their own governments absence neglect and lesser political substance of their own claim, which originated in its confrontation against Spain for colonial domination of the islands, while Argentina though it appeared in the dispute last in terms of it being a Republic, came to the scene with the islands already put within the government of Buenos Aires's administration by Spain since 1776, and was the first country to endow the islands with and actual integral national sovereignty, and "a possible colonial claim". I bet you didn't know that either. Nonetheless, Britain simply decided to forcefully take them from Argentina at a moment it could not defend itself in part because it had just recently been unjustly and abusively attacked by the United States. Never in 150 years until 1982 did Britain ever take Argentina seriously nor respected their continual protests and claim enough to truly mean to pursue an honorable resolution and settlement to the conflict, offensively blackmailing the country with commercial favor and phony friendship in exchange for silence over the dispute. It immediately proceeded to create a strategy to forge the islands away from Argentina while ignorning the dispute; a ploy fake construct of legitimacy which cleverly changed the notions of "invasive colony or occupation" to the term "British Overseas Territory". Britain then used principals which would have been inapplicable to a political international dispute and conflicted situation through putting its own people on the islands as a human shield and then vesting their significance with values of sovereignty like "right to self determination". By doing this Britain intentionally confused the situaion and silence the real argument by still to this day painting over the past and true history of usurpation of an Argentine territory and making it about a colonial situation, misinforming the world and keeping it from paying attention to the real history that occurred, and other facts like for example that the islanders were brought to the islands after expelling Argentina for the purpose of having them fight for the right to the islands when the time came. This is how London attempts to avoid facing justice for its actions making it a situation to do with "a non self governing territory's people decision", rather than the truth which was an action committed against Argentina on Argentine territory, giving rise to this dispute born in 1833. In other words, Britain would have people believe this is about two countries fighting over an independent piece of land, when what actually occurred is that Argentina had incorporated to its territory a geographically necessarily belonging part of land that had been disputed between Britain and Spain, and that ultimately Britain being on the other side of the globe, de-prioritized and never managed to settle and establish administration on, nor of it, having been present on the islands for barely four years 50 years prior to Argentina's official inclusion to its territory. You can see British strategy still going on today, by for example noticing how Britain was quick to make sure that the headlines the world read in 1982 and everything that would be said thereafter never told the story that the Junta invaded in order to recuperate these islands that were occupied by Britain in 1833 after expelling the Argentinians off them first, nor that it was Britain who decided to use the force of war in 1982 once more to take them from Argentina. Argentina did not start a war in 1982, it merely took back and recuperated territory that had been taken from them originally. Britain never sought a peaceful resolution, because it needed the action to be seen as an attack on its territory so that it had an excuse to create a war on the islands. The British intentionally educate people to believe their strategic narrative through the selection of phrases like "Argentina invaded British territory". Through explanations of political principals on of how for example they run their British Overseas Territories, Britain audaciously is looking to change in front of everyone's noses the definition and description of international matters such as colonial expansionism, by using and fake prioritizing the importance of the residents of these places, so that essentially it can hide its own objectives and get away with stealing, while it has the world believe it behaves nobly.
Very informative,but the "brass tacks" are that the majority of the People who live on the Islands see themselves as British.Sadly what happened in the 1800's doesn't have much bearing in 2021.The French don't have a problem with the Channel Islands being part of the UK.......and they are SO much nearer to France than Argentina is to the Falklands.Its not like Argentina is overpopulated......is it?Maybe the Argentinians will control "Las Malvinas" one day,but it will only happen once the "Brits" have left the Falklands.
@@alanstevens8896 This conflict dispute is historical, and based on an event of forceful usurpation that was diplomatically never forgiven by Argentina. It is not about the war to recuperate the islands in 1982, nor about the islanders themselves. If anything the islanders should be complaining to Britain about putting them intentionally in harms way not just once, but twice! If we are to respect each other as nations in this world, nations of equal right to be acknowledged and honored, things can not be as you and your country are attempting to forge and twist them. The principle of a people's right to self determination may very well be an issue between the islanders and London, but not between the islanders and Argentina as the conflict is between the British and the Argentinians. The islanders do not fit the qualification of an integrally autonomous sovereignty of themselves, and thus nor are they relevant to the list of non self governing territories at the U.N, as they have always been since their arrival on the islands willingly under British rule and moreover brought to the islands to serve in the purpose of unlawful expansionism by shielding London from having to deal before the world with Argentina about their denouncement of this territory they consider robbed from them. ... You and your country can keep trying to re-define this matter, attempt to bury events concerning Argentina and its right to nationhood, you can keep trying to turn this into some politically capricious contemporary matter centered around the war of 82 and the islanders falsely accusing Argentina of, but the facts about it, the fact that neither Britain nor the United States possessed any right to attack and remove the lawfully established Argentine settlement in 1820, are never going to change as they have been laid down already in history by all the recorded events concerning all three countries, therefore unchangeable.
Patrick,you are obviously a well educated man,unlike me who only went to a "Secondary Modern" School.The ultimate irony there is that someone I know,who is a few years older than me was with Colonel H Jones of the 2nd Battalion the Parachute Regiment who lost his life whilst in the Falklands,during the war there in 1982.So Britain has run the Falklands since 1833,nearly 190 years.So you are saying that Britain "stole" the Islands from Argentina in 1820.Can't argue with that,only alot of Countries were invading other ones at that time.Lets see now,I believe that the ethnic origin of nearly 97% of Argentinians is European.By the way,my ethnicity is 91.7% English,and 8.3% Scandinavian.So you can say that my ancestors are English.....and have been for a very long time.I would imagine that the original occupants of Argentina would have been native Indians? So when Spain conquered Argentina,they must have killed alot of the "Natives" in the process? So pray tell me,what's the difference between that,and Britain booting out Argentinians from the Falklands in 1820? They had nearly 150 years to win them back,so why did it take until 1982 for that to happen? While we're on the subject of not very nice People;what about the fact that between 1939 to 1945,Britain and her Allies were trying to save the World from one Adolf Hitler,whilst Argentinian was giving the Nazis shelter? Rumour has it that Hitler fled to Argentina after the War,lived there for many years,then went to Chile I believe,and died there in 1971.....personally I don't believe that,but I saw it on a TV programme recently,and the person who said that was.......Argentinian.I have no argument with the Argentinian People,who I believe are very hospitable,and kind.The Falklands War can be blamed on one person......General Galtieri,who was a Dictator,in trouble at the time,and thought...."I know a way out of my problems....."I'll invade the Malvinas,and get it back for Argentina .......thus making me,VERY POPULAR." The rest Patrick...is History.
@@alanstevens8896 You touched on too many different things to give you just one response to your comment Alan. There are about 10 different points that we could argue each one of them in terms of what it was all really about. If the world is going to "work it out" and solve its political sovereignty issues and confrontations, we have to draw a line somewhere, somewhere sensible where we can work with realities still existing and comprehensibly represented. That would mean all modern nations today represented at the United Nations. Otherwise we could keep moving the bar back to oblivion in the necessary premise of seeking justice for everyone, not just a few of us. In this sense the old civilizations destroyed by the Spanish, Portuguese, English, French, Dutch and Germans are too far gone and dissolved to draw any reasonable construction of justice through representation. That's why people like the Mapuche in Chile and Argentina are shouting a bunch of lies based on righteous sounding ideologies that in truth would not be about these arbitrarily mixed people. On the other hand, Britain and Argentina were both here in their present form during the 1830's, during the creation of the U.N. and now. Is war the answer to you? Shouldn't we be praising Argentina for patiently hanging on the diplomatic means for 187 years already? Isn't that what supposedly the world and countries like Britain purport to want for the world? To resolve things diplomatically? The point is about respecting each and looking for a just way to end conflicts, and seek a fair compensating solution, like split the islands in half for example, not exploit one's superior military and economic power to disrespect and ignore the importance a people give a historical conflict that is about land taken from that people. What your logic is proposing is that as a world we should say to countries that are weaker poorer and needier of good relations with others to whom injustice was committed to by a stronger one, "oh well!! tough! get over it!" Do you think that is how countries should drive the world forward? By the law of the jungle?
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini Patrick,I don't think that War is the answer to problems,but sometimes it appears that is the only course of action available......sadly.As long as the People on the Falklands/Malvinas want to stay British,I can't see any other solution to the issue,than they stay as they are.Can't remember if I mentioned this to you,but here goes.I don't know if you are aware of the Channel Islands just off the Coast of France,but they are British.We are not talking 400 miles here,more like 30 or more.France could try and claim them,but they haven't as far as I know.On one of the Islands....Jersey,they speak "Jersey French," which is a mixture of French and English.There are quite a few French place names on Jersey,maybe the French think,as their Country is so big.......they don't need any more Land.Argentina is very big as well,unlike the UK which is overcrowded,and not very big,with a population of about 60 Million.
Why all this expense for a barren rock? I’ve heard there is oil in the waters, so why don’t they drill already. I don’t understand this waste of resources
@@eldurkiiipetruski7896 No, es que encima es solo para entendidos, porque hay que averiguar lo que fue el uso del exocet!! Tremendo!!! me reia solo a la madrugada 😂😂
la plataforma marina es argentina... legalmente es argentina... un abogado comun en una corte mundial imparcial gana el juicio y la tienen que devolver mas todo los costos en robar el pescado y el petroleo...
obrbob194 I’m shocked... really shocked you said that! As a fellow Brit, what you SHOULD have said is “come on then, if you think you’re ‘ard enough”. lol. 😉
@Gar ....mr, Engkis, so,eday we will see each other again , those are our lamds and you know it let,s avoid another war...MALVINAS ARGENTINAS,. MY RESPECTS TO THE INGLISH SOLDIERS WHO LOST THEIR LIVES.-
@@cesarwaltermigueles9562 Please don't test Britain in war , we are very experienced at it ...let's hope Argentina will move on and get its own affairs in order .
@@loyalist5736 Argentina is not a warring country. Yet nonetheless it's one of the family of nations that are constantly bamboozled by the British and Americans after being foolish enough to think they needed to let themselves be lead by these two powers after winning their wars of independence. Britain has never been a friend to the Argentinians, though there are still convinced you have been, but the truth is that Britain has always tried to use and fool Argentina, both countries the U.S. and U.K, think of all of the ex Spanish Empire nations with insufferable bigotry and contempt. I know it because I grew up in America and I know very well how 'we' and you think about Hispanic countries. Britain has always exploited invasively Argentina's friendship and defenselessness, seeking always to first put its foot in through political and commercial relationships. Starting in 1806 and 1807, in 1845 and in 1982 as well though on the outside no one officially sees it that way. WHY!?? What has Argentina ever done to Britain?? 1982 was the only time there was a military backlash against 150 of insolence, ignoring our diplomatic protests. The military occupation exploited the sentiment of desired justice for the usurpation of 1833 in the Argentine people, but your bigotry completely intoxicates your narratives and story telling, it made sure to never treat that event as a territorial dispute more than token mentions. It constructed the international story as an invasion of British territory, though it wasn't. Nothing new in that relationship, one that is saturated with political manipulation, even supporting of the Generals during the 70's genocidal attack on their population. Britain abuses and uses Hispanic passivity and self weakness, their lack of confidence in themselves, from Belice to Jamaica, Cuba and Venezuela, Ecuador, you used Chile against Bolivia, Brazil against Argentina... Britain truly is the only enemy we have ever had, and its an lying enemy in disguise. Can you tell me WHY?? Why can't your country get its bloody claws out of our continent? Why does it want to contest everything that is part of our world? Always having something to say, something to meddle in!! You want ALL OF ANTARTICA! Even the part that is directly below Argentina? WhY? Why do you feel you have more right than others to this world? You're pigs you use friendship to rob the unsuspecting, that's what you've always done! In India, in China, in Africa and in South America. That's why the South Atlantic war for the Malvinas was Britain's war of Shame. Because you knew damn well Galtieri really believed Britain would negotiate, you fooled them and yet again attacked a country that thought of yours as a friend. You're phony users, and there's plenty of material that proves you knew what the Junta was planing and you intentionally let them step on the stick so you could manipulate and subjugate the Argentine people even more. WHY?? Again! What has Argentina ever done to Britain?? Why didn't you ever ask for a peaceful resolution to that conflict!? Because you didn't want one. OK?? You are simply a bastard country full of contempt for the world, except for those countries that are useful war allies too you, because you're users, because to Britain the world is still not a place humanity must share and find a way of living together in peace as equals, it still is the source of its own sustenance, and it covets it like someone who doesn't want others to know what they found.
@@loyalist5736 Do you still need more details? Do you think Britain did not know Argentina could not last more then three months fighting before it ran out of munitions? Do you not think British intelligence new one way or the other it was going to be an easy win, and that the U.S. was not going to make sure the U.K. won? Argentina rejected any real assistance by other countries. You should be ashamed of yourselves! Its soldiers were untrained conscripts from a society that is peaceful, of kids that do not grow up watching war and gore movies nor talking about bombing this country or that country, they are on the opposite end of the spectrum compared to your war mentality society of professional soldiers. Britain practically raped Argentina's innocence, a country that only had admiration and trust for Britain, just so it could have MORE MORE MORE of the world, regardless of justice, but it makes sure to bury that assessment and paint the generic war freedom vs dictators bullshit story. Your country's a disgrace. That's why it was your War of Shame. It was as easy as robbing from your own family, or rapped your best friend. This is the main reason why you try to make sure there is no distinction made between the Constitutional Nation and its people's cultural society "country", and the only ones who actually were responsible for using force to take back the islands, and who sprung the event secretly behind their people's backs, the Junta's Generals. The Argentinians never in a million years would have ever even thought of anything militaristic against Britain, even in fantasy they saw them as friends and Britain understood that very well. Yet Britain want's to make sure the world and especially the islanders don't understand the realism of that. It needs the islanders to think of Argentina as its enemy. And it makes sure that is the narrative that is installed. One can see this self evidently unfolding since the day the war ended until this very day, with every decision and event that occurs anywhere related to the South Atlantic. The war was needed, it was used, and it is being exploited. Britain always puts its foot in front of Argentina, and in front of any significant political progress towards sovereignty ex Spanish Empire nations attempt. ... It's what the British people are kept in the dark about, believing your fairy tales of merit progress and rightful honor. You're the bully rapists of the planet to be truthful.
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini LOL You can't half babble on about pure shit ....I tripped over blame the British, our economy is shit blame the British banks ..we invaded British territory and lost the war because of it lol ..Argentina were bullying its nabours and thought it could also bully Britain I mean what are they going to do about it so far away ....the rest is history. ...move on .
This conflict dispute is historical, and based on an event of forceful usurpation that was diplomatically never forgiven by Argentina. It is not about the war to recuperate the islands in 1982, nor about the islanders themselves. If anything the islanders should be complaining to Britain about putting them intentionally in harms way not just once, but twice! If we are to respect each other as nations in this world, nations of equal right to be acknowledged and honored, things can not be as you and your country are attempting to forge and twist them. The principle of a people's right to self determination may very well be an issue between the islanders and London, but not between the islanders and Argentina as the conflict is between the British and the Argentinians. The islanders do not fit the qualification of an integrally autonomous sovereignty of themselves, and thus nor are they relevant to the list of non self governing territories at the U.N, as they have always been since their arrival on the islands willingly under British rule and moreover brought to the islands to serve in the purpose of unlawful expansionism by shielding London from having to deal before the world with Argentina about their denouncement of this territory they consider robbed from them. ... You and your country can keep trying to re-define this matter, attempt to bury events concerning Argentina and its right to nationhood, you can keep trying to turn this into some politically capricious contemporary matter centered around the war of 82 and the islanders falsely accusing Argentina of, but the facts about it, the fact that neither Britain nor the United States possessed any right to attack and remove the lawfully established Argentine settlement in 1820, are never going to change as they have been laid down already in history by all the recorded events concerning all three countries, therefore unchangeable.
If we are to respect each other lol ...Argentina bully and try to make life as hard as possible for the islanders in many diffrent ways economically mostly and trying to turn other countries in the region against them ..Grow up Argentina.
@@garwhittaker3743 You do realize you are beyond prejudicially bigoted with contempt, right? It's more like you have a rotting pretzel inside your brain.
@Patrick before Argentine troops were kicked off in 1982 alot of your soldiers shit in people's houses smeared it over peoples walls and even shit in people's beds and draws. ..No wonder they want nothing to do with them .
Lmao, that's the dumbest thing I've ever read. Seriously, does making things up lies like this actually help you get over Argentina's constant failures? -Failed to negotiate because you're too stupid -Failed to conquer the islands because you're cowards -Cannot run an economy to save your lives (and it cost 649+ of your lives 😂) Why doesn't Argentina try and be less pathetic instead of making up stories and claiming other people's things?
Sorry about your misinformed belief, but NO. It is known that Britain was NOT the first to sight or land on the Islands, the possibilities are a few, including that of Piti Reis the Turkish commander, it is possible that the British were the first to set foot or sail into the canal, as well as not the first. But the Dutch are who are believed to have discovered the Islands and named them. The French were the first ones to build a settlement which is ultimately the only thing that really counts. The Spanish then made justice on their original territorial claim and officially bought whatever rights the French had earned, which entitled them to kick the British off the Western Island. And 2, by the time Britain "lay its unlawful claim", they were already Spanish Territory, in fact the British knew this and thought they could try to get away with sneaking in Port Egmont anyways, and yet eventually yielded back to Spain and abandoned Port Egmont. In fact evidence of a robbing policy is the fact that they never went back to Port Egmont, but took the Islands from the Argentine on the Eastern Island which they had never set foot on. The British left as always antagonistically, because all they've ever done in this world is bring discord fight and war to the peaceful existence of people. While Spain was at that point still in the process of civilizing the old world giving equal rights under god to all people in conquered. Very different to how Britain treated its colonized subjects it would put to work for his Majesty, take their resources and managed the business "their way" through slaves and so forth. Spain did not have "colonies," that word comes from English History. Spain made province type autonomous territories often with local governors. The Southern Cone and Malvinas was part of the Vice-royalty of the Plata River, with capital in BUENOS AIRES. We had the strongest world currency, and Britain basically was jealous and wanted to undermine and have all that Spain had earned. The Vice-royalty, became the United Provinces with capital in BUENOS AIRES, and the United Provinces became Argentina with capital, Buenos Aires. When Spain retreated in 1811 from the Malvinas because of Argentina, Argentina rightfully inherited its abandoned territories through its victory. No one in South America contests that, that's why they all support the Argentine claim (unless they want to kiss the IMF, the U.S. or U.K.'s ass of course). Britain did not seize the Islands upon Spain's retreat, it waited for the right contextual situation, lied to Argentina like a thief about being its ally and friend (same as 82, tag team once more, this time going against the O.A.S.), while it forcefully removed the Islands Argentinian loyal occupants during a key moment of weakness caused by ... no other than the U.S. pirate attack on Puerto Soledad. Why? Because they did not want laws and rules, they wanted to scavenge the land. The U.S. and U.K. are famous for tag team robbing territories, like they did with Diego Garcia, the Virgin Islands and other Caribbean "situations". It looks to me you have been exclusively educated by the British propagandist narrative taught to the British people and the Islanders; because you seem to know nothing other that what concerns Britain's convenient version of events, though self servingly false it may be. Like what is currently taught about WW2, "my little savoir of the world, liberator of the Jews hero" LOL lol In fact, the English language is today definitely the greatest producer of lies in human history out of all the world's literary history, and people in both America and the England are both starting to admit that. Luckily. Unfortunately uncovering the unforgivable truth of the millions both our countries have murdered in order to control AND USE the world. You don't actually believe Galtieri was stupid enough to go straight into a losing war do you? You do, don't you? Just like you believe Britain came reaaaaaallyyy close to not winning that war. LOL Perhaps ... caring more about your own education would be my advice to you.
Stop moaning. The Falkland islanders want to remain British so get over it you bore! Concentrate on issues closer to home eh......god knows you've enough of them.
Come and get them cowards. Maybe form another fascist government while you're at it. The British military can use you for target practice, meanwhile your dictator can murder your citizens like last time. Efficient pest control for Argies 😘
Sorry about your misinformed belief, but NO. It is known that Britain was NOT the first to sight or land on the Islands, the possibilities are a few, including that of Piti Reis the Turkish commander, it is possible that the British were the first to set foot or sail into the canal, as well as not the first. But the Dutch are who are believed to have discovered the Islands and named them. The French were the first ones to build a settlement which is ultimately the only thing that really counts. The Spanish then made justice on their original territorial claim and officially bought whatever rights the French had earned, which entitled them to kick the British off the Western Island. And 2, by the time Britain "lay its unlawful claim", they were already Spanish Territory, in fact the British knew this and thought they could try to get away with sneaking in Port Egmont anyways, and yet eventually yielded back to Spain and abandoned Port Egmont. In fact evidence of a robbing policy is the fact that they never went back to Port Egmont, but took the Islands from the Argentine on the Eastern Island which they had never set foot on. The British left as always antagonistically, because all they've ever done in this world is bring discord fight and war to the peaceful existence of people. While Spain was at that point still in the process of civilizing the old world giving equal rights under god to all people in conquered. Very different to how Britain treated its colonized subjects it would put to work for his Majesty, take their resources and managed the business "their way" through slaves and so forth. Spain did not have "colonies," that word comes from English History. Spain made province type autonomous territories often with local governors. The Southern Cone and Malvinas was part of the Vice-royalty of the Plata River, with capital in BUENOS AIRES. We had the strongest world currency, and Britain basically was jealous and wanted to undermine and have all that Spain had earned. The Vice-royalty, became the United Provinces with capital in BUENOS AIRES, and the United Provinces became Argentina with capital, Buenos Aires. When Spain retreated in 1811 from the Malvinas because of Argentina, Argentina rightfully inherited its abandoned territories through its victory. No one in South America contests that, that's why they all support the Argentine claim (unless they want to kiss the IMF, the U.S. or U.K.'s ass of course). Britain did not seize the Islands upon Spain's retreat, it waited for the right contextual situation, lied to Argentina like a thief about being its ally and friend (same as 82, tag team once more, this time going against the O.A.S.), while it forcefully removed the Islands Argentinian loyal occupants during a key moment of weakness caused by ... no other than the U.S. pirate attack on Puerto Soledad. Why? Because they did not want laws and rules, they wanted to scavenge the land. The U.S. and U.K. are famous for tag team robbing territories, like they did with Diego Garcia, the Virgin Islands and other Caribbean "situations". It looks to me you have been exclusively educated by the British propagandist narrative taught to the British people and the Islanders; because you seem to know nothing other that what concerns Britain's convenient version of events, though self servingly false it may be. Like what is currently taught about WW2, "my little savoir of the world, liberator of the Jews hero" LOL lol In fact, the English language is today definitely the greatest producer of lies in human history out of all the world's literary history, and people in both America and the England are both starting to admit that. Luckily. Unfortunately uncovering the unforgivable truth of the millions both our countries have murdered in order to control AND USE the world. You don't actually believe Galtieri was stupid enough to go straight into a losing war do you? You do, don't you? Just like you believe Britain came reaaaaaallyyy close to not winning that war. LOL Perhaps ... caring more about your own education would be my advice to you.
Dear Argentina, this is what a real country's infrastructure looks like
Don't let Argentines see this video if they don't die. Greetings from Brazil.
Go judge your own country bigot!
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini
Says the literal warmonger in the comment section of this video.
jajajajaja!!!!, Un "país" real seria si no viviece de la pirateria "hombre", jajajaja, andaaaaa, son piratas ustedes!; asi todo han firmado 4 rendiciones incondicionales, 4 veces rechazo Argentina invasiones inglesas, y si queres te digo los años, las fechas, andaaaaa.... "País" enserio, que no pueden derrotar aun "País" del octavo mundo bananero como el nuestro, son una verguenza ustedes!, suerte con en Brexit y la Union Europea!, ah!... y con Rusia tambien. Saludos Pirata!.
@@andrestorres4545 Los Britanicos están a años Luz de ustedes Argentos ... los tiene lavando baños en UK
The landscape and weather look so much like northern Scotland, with barren land devoid of trees and snow.
Just like in Scotland, the animals are eating everything. Without the deer in Scotland there would be scrubs and trees, without the many sheep there would be vegetation in the Falklands. The Faroe Islands has the same issue, bare hills because of too many sheep eating everything.
@@jackmorgan1677 Have you actually been there. ?
I served on the Island for a year starting from April 78. We lived in an old hut which had been lane derelict for 30 years until the Royal marines chamferred it up to live in. Absolutely no money was put into a proposed new barracks which was wished to be sited near the airport along with a plan to quickly blow up the airfield with pre-planned and readied mines. Billions of dollars later...........and I had an extra visit in 82.
Write about it. A book or just a blog!
Wouldn't have made any difference...it was an amphibious landing.
@@dogsnads5634 The airport was of massive importance and its destruction would have caused them lot of problem's.
The top layers of tarmac were first applied (1985/86) to a very deep dry lean (concrete) base of the main and secondary runways of Mount Pleasant Airport. This is not to be confused with the very much smaller airport at Port Stanley some 30 miles or so from here. No airport here is named after Shackleton, that was the name given to the resurfacing and refurbishing project which this video depicts. The asphalt was presumably relaid because the old tarmac was 25 years old and worn, and the landing lights, hydraulic arrestor gear and power and fibre optic cable replaced or re-routed to suit new technology. The concrete base will probably be good for 100+ years, it’s the tarmac that wears out. The materials would have been driven by lorry from the harbour to the airfield about 8 miles away. (I worked on the original).
I just watched a video of the original work. Nice job.
th-cam.com/video/CUURpBzttrA/w-d-xo.html
I was there in 1984 on the Chinooks, we were based out at Kelly's Garden (San Carlos). WE kept them flying in all weathes delivering ONE container at a time to get them started at MP! I worked on the mighty VC10 many moons ago and it pleased me to see them still flying then from the airport, but sadly now they replaced them with some crap aircraft! Loved it down there, I would love to go back but i retire in a few years and Im no millionaire so doubt I'll ever see the Islands again. We got there on a troop ship and came home on SS UGANDA a gem of a ship sadly she is now long gone too. All the best to the forces in the Falklands!
Looks like another wonderful achievement! I was lucky to be involved in the very first contract in 1986! Well done Colas!
There’s so much space for more people on the Falklands. Even if the population increase 10 folds, it is still way under populated.
A lot of wind swept barren space.
I recall reading in some Falkland Islands Government literature some years ago that the people can emigrate from Britain to the the Islands as long as they have useful skills or want to establish a business.
Man I landed here in 1989 for a 6 month tour, 6 months later America, 4 months later Desert Storm, 6 months later Belfast, 1 year later Bosnia 6 months later Canada and 1 year later I was retired and moving to Canada 😎😎😎 28 years later I’m an old man 🤣🤣🤣 since been to all of the USA, China, Korea and India with work. Be nice to travel nowhere
I’d like to thank the veterans and those that gave their lives during this conflict, also I’d like to thank the Argentine Junta under Galtieri for helping Britain to get it’s shit together over the Falklands. Gracias.
POR LA DERROTA ARG AFUUUUUERA LA DICTADURA NO OS OLVIDEIS
So many angry Argentinians commenting here... If the people living in the islands want to remain British, let them be. Same as Gibraltar.
bullshit lie. Those are British territories Britain uses the whole "self determination" crap to hide its agendas behind.
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini What agenda ? Bellend.
@@paulc2130 You're calling 'ME' a "bellend", and you don't even know what a country's international agenda in the world means?
@@paulc2130 I suppose you need me to spoon feed you the explanation of what government international non official geopolitical projects and goals are.
Get out of the way please, if you got nothing to say, but condescending put downs (as usual)
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini So answer the question Bellend....
They should build a road network. It doesn't have to be extensive, but something that will connect and link the various outlying areas. They can use natural resources such as hard rock, ballast and volcanic clay already existing on the islands.
Nahhhh leave the islands wild, makes it a haven for the wildlife and much more difficult for the Argentinians to invade
i am so proud of my countrymen and women , so proud my body has problems containing my heart , but alas i am so ashamed of our politicians.
You get the impression colas did some work down there
That is interesting. Just finished watching the Doco on the Original construction of the base in 1983
I forget ..who was the contractor ? Seems very vague !
It looks so different to how it did 40 years and a couple of weeks ago…..Per Mare Per Terram
Looks like the argentinians shouldn't expect to get their hands on the Falklands anytime soon.... the Brits are really settling in for the long haul.
Andersons Road you could have said that in 1833 when the English returned to the island and setup shop pemtnanently. The people are Englishmen through and through.
@@kcimb Whatever the historical arguments are it part of the UK now by force of arms. The UK is demonstrably ready to kill to keep it question is are the bean eaters willing to die trying to take it.......
Andersons Road for the 4th or 5th time. It is English, now and forever
@@kcimb Relax buddy, I'm on your side.
Yeh we've already been here over 200yrs ! 💪🙂
Colas, what a wonderful piece of publicity, well done.
In my ignorance I did not know the new airfield was dedicated to Shackleton, so thank you for educating a 60+ year old
Prior to this I was watching a video of RN Phantoms "burning up" the US Saratoga flight deck, quite literary.
I love those corporate videos, funny as fuck being told how fucking great they are..
Surprised COLAS didn’t put stickers on the aircraft
Loooool
Impressive build project. Argentina couldnt do it. The Islands will always be British even if England isnt any longer.
Very interesting and I like the precision work in that difficult zone, congratulations.
With respect
No solo invierten para afincarse ....aun mas.., sino porque es el salto a la Antartida ..y lo.mas preciafo pata ellos..nuestra Patagonia...
so what the hell was Project Shakelton? An extra runway or taxiways or what?
It's strange that they didn't say what they were actually doing, but it was just resurfacing the runway at Mount Pleasant. www.ceequal.com/case-studies/project-shackleton-falkland-islands-runway-resurfacing-project/
Refurbishment of existing runways and electrical cabling.
Talking of "mobilisation" when it was probably planned 12 months in advance
Colas just reminding the Argentinans to back off
Jajaja los Argentinos retroceden, pero antes te diezma la flota naval...
@@enzoborettini8252 Your NAVAL FLEET?? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Biggest laugh of the week. Your submarines run on Diesel and blow up killing your naval crews. Meanwhile our nuclear powered Astute class subs can HEAR every single ship that leaves the shore in Argentina....all the way from the Falklands!!! Your NAVAL FORCE won't get far this time matey. You will find the ships are sinking before you have even found your bunks!!
Nath D
But your fleet is sleeping with SpongeBob
@@ezequieltedesco1373 Well so is the Belgrano
Kyle Presley
One
Resolution UN ( ONU ) 20 / 65 of descolonized
@Gar exactly
@Gar Si Sr, de la ONU!. siguen siendo COLONIA si estan bajo bandera britanica, si se independizan unicamente serian un país pero si siguen bajo en manto britanico...
UN charter of self determination.
@@jwadaow isnot nort pole Malvinas, autodeterminación isnot isnot válido in thai case
@@jwadaow eso todavia queda a determinar hermano... Lamentablemente, la ONU exige sentarse al Reino Unido y negociar con Argentina, sinceramente me gustaria que termine esta guerra que no termino y que algun dia las Falklands o Malvinas sean un pais independiente del Reino Unido y de Argentina, del continente Americano, como lo son Canada, Australia, Nueva Zelanda, etc. Es mi mas sincera opinion hermano. Saludos.
air-bridge arriving on time - really hummmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Sooo . . . what exactly got built?
VIVA UK VIVA CHILE PARTNERSHIP FOR EVER
eso crees?? hasta que los piratas ingleses decidan tomar por la fuerza alguna isla chilena.
@@flycan641 No te Preocupes Vive mientras Puedas
🇬🇧❤🇨🇱
@@jackwhitehead5233 Thanks RAF 🇬🇧 For the Last AWACS SENTRYS 3D 🇨🇱🤝🇬🇧🍻
@@flycan641 son de fiar no así uds.
ESTE AEROPUERTO CONSTRUIDO POR LOS BRITANICOS ES MEJOR QUE CUALQUIER BASE MILITAR ARGENTINA JAJAJAJA 🤣 😜 SALUDOS DESDE CHILE 🇨🇱🤝🇬🇧
🇬🇧❤🇨🇱
Nada nada que ver , ese aeropuerto es un aeropuerto basico de doble uso , implican mas gastos y retrasos
las bases militares ARGENTINAS estan hechas especificamente solo para uso militar o de exportacion.
Ah y para tu mente que se quedo retrasada en 1982 , Chile y Argentina somos aliados y Chile apoya la soberania argentina en Malvinas.Saludos
Todo lo que quieras, pero la Patagonia se la sacamos , quedaron en un pasillo A JAJAJAJA 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
@@gabyfromhell1 pero este oasillo tiene más de 3.000 islas ,incluso la más lejana es RAPA NUI🗿🗿🗿y está a 3.765 kms y es de CHILE ,las falklands islands están a pocos 600 kms y son de tus padres ingleses, recuerda "LOS COBARDES SE RINDEN EN SU PROPIA CASA " Y LOS VIOLAN 👉👌🥺🥺🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Robando son experto. Igual disfruta del ají Falkland en donde tu sabes, gauchito poto pelado. Te dejamos sin isla, Chile e Inglaterra aliados por siempre.
All that for some cola - must love their soft drinks down there.
🇨🇱🤝🇬🇧
Jajaja te bajaste los pantalones con los ingleses, no tuvieron dignidad los chilenos
@@miltonmonzon6703Argentina was literally about to invade Chile around the same time so no shit theyd side with us
Malvinas argentinas viva la patria carajo soy estado unidense ,pero muy orgulloso de llevar sangre latina
never.
@@ivangodbold292 always Argentinian Island
Gracias amigo
Lmao 649 Argie corpses suggest otherwise 🇬🇧😂😘
Still British
Recuperaremos lo que es nuestro por derecho
Look forward to sending more Argies back to their slums in body bags 😘
I wonder how many employees are ex forces?
Always been a Mr Pibb fan
Hacen emprendimientos en un territorio que no les pertenece, y apuntan a la Antártida....es evidente
😂😂😂
**🇦🇷ISLAS MALVINAS 🇦🇷**
SOBERANÍA NACIONAL DE LA REPÚBLICA ARGENTINA .
Nuestra causa sigue siendo justa, contra los usurpadores .
Los isleños son ciudadanos británicos y desean seguir siéndolo. Si bien eso sigue siendo cierto, el gobierno del Reino Unido los protegerá.
Come and get your islands then, the British military has weapons to test and if they're aimed at Argies then it technically counts as pest control 😘
@@jackwhitehead5233 XXI EL SIGLO DE ARGENTINA ARRRRRRRRRRSADA CAPITAL CIUDADES ALEPO SIRIA DE SUD AMERICA ARDE ARDE
Las Malvinas, Georgias y Sándwich del Sur son Argentinas 🇦🇷
Except they arent
649 Argie corpses suggest otherwise 😘
No they aren’t I live in the Falklands, fuck off baddy, you are sad about loosing a war that happened 40 years ago grow and move on, we want to remain British
1982 decided otherwise!
Argentinian friends, this is what a modern developed country looks like.
I agree, but you built it on Argentinian land...
@@flycan641 put you flag on the island for more then five years and as well as get the land owners of the, "Falkland islands". To agreeing to becoming Argentina. Then maybe then you can claim the island's.
🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
MALVINAS ARGENTINAS! Pirates, we will return!!!!!
@@j.4354
If you mean the last dictatorship, it was from 1976 to 1983, which does not take away our right to claim for our territory, usurped in 1833 by the United Kingdom, we all know that the Malvinas are Argentine, and that the British position is merely imperialist and military strategist should give you shame!
Argentina's militaty is in even worse shape now than it was in 82. What exactly do you expect to accomplish? How many times do the Brits have to teach you this lesson?
@@juandemalvinas Didn't the inhabitants vote to remain in Commonwealth? Also the only reason the junta invaded the FALKLANDS was to gain popularity for their illegal regime. However, if you're willing to try again with Argentina's bad economy and underfunded and understaffed military you'll find her majesties armed forces ready to receive you.
Go home Argie, your drunk.
@@j.4354 savage m8
If we stay in the EU We'll probably have to give the islands to Argentina... Jo Swinson and co. bring it on....
What a stupid comment!!!
And the Irish will get back Northern Ireland when we leave, the Scottish will leave and rejoin the EU.
And Great Britain the United Kingdom will be no more Brexiteers are the real traitors.
By staying with France and Netherlands and other states with overseas territories in the EU has actually made them vote in favour of UK rule over the islands.. by leaving the EU they could theoretically turn against us in the UN as they kinda have started to do with the Chaigos Islands issue.. that said if Jeremy Corbyn wins he would leave every colony UK has but that has nothing to do with the EU.
Que cagazoooo nos tienen actualmente por favor !!!!
correccion se dise malvinas no falklands
never heard of malvinas.
Es triste ver como mientras los Ingleses y Kelpers progresan construyendo en las Islas en continente los políticos de turno se la pasan en disputas por poder, dinero, clientelismo y el país teniendolo todo no avanza. Un ejemplo salta a la vista, en las Islas estan proyectando la pavimentación haciendo rutas y calles con material de construcción de primera calidad, mientras tanto en las provincias patagónicas no te levantan una ciudad un aeropuerto o un nuevo puerto ni por chiste porque no solo están en la pelea política de ver quien se la lleva mejor sino que nunca hay preusupuesto o el del partido tal se lo traba rn el congreso al del otro partido y también que por ejemplo en la provincia de Buenos Aires si un intendente manda a hacer una obra es un bacheo de mala calidad o calles que de un año para otro terminan requesbrajadas partidas llenas de pozos porque inflan un presupuesto por un valor cuando el coste de los materiales usados son bajos dada la baja calidad, conclusión pasan un presupuesto por un número, compran por uno inferior y se quedan con el vuelto y las calles parecen sacadas de un paisaje lunar. Así no se puede progresar, así no podemos cambiar de mentalidad, uno puede pedir y decir que las Malvinas son Argentinas pero la verdad y la realidad va a ser que en un futuro nos vamos a quedar azorados con las frases en la boca porque del otro lado vamos a ver algo tan insuperable que nunca podremos alcanzar. Esa es la verdad. Lo lamento por mi país Argentina al que amo con mi vida.
Argentina es una sociedad muy corrupta tristemente. leed libro de Marcos Aguinis!
Que bueno tienen todo un ejército completo más armamento de largo alcance aaaaa pero nosotros no podemos tener lo mismo porque su papi Norteamérica se enoja. Siempre el padre cuidando y limpiándole el culo al hijo. Pero bueno así están las cosas por algo en las películas siempre salen como piratas es lamentable
They speak English in the Falklands....not Spanish.
@@pedroacdc7770You guys just can't accept it can you not? Boohoo!
@@nathd1748 ISLAS MALVINAS ARGENTINAS !!! PIRATAS !!
@@ellibanes7153 Only in your dreams....until you wake up for a piss!! Argentina can't even get its shit together at HOME never mind some islands hundreds of miles away!!
Ya vamos a ver ja ja
Las Islas Malvinas, Georgias y Sandwich del sur, todo su mar adyacente, plataforma submarina y porción antartica ¡¡¡ FUERON, SON Y SERÁN SIEMPRE ARGENTINAS !!!
Mírame yo también soy argentino “las Islas Malvinas fueron son y serán siempre argentinas”🤡🤡🤡😂😂😂
Why aren't they Argentine then?
Are you too scared to take your islands back? Coward 🤡
Still British!
"The Robbed Territory"
No, we are talking about the Malvinas Islands.
@Gar
Sorry about your misinformed belief, but NO. It is known that Britain was NOT the first to sight or land on the Islands, the possibilities are a few, including that of Piti Reis they Turkish commander, it is possible that the British were the first to set foot or sail into the canal, as well as not the first. But the Dutch are who are believed to have discovered the Islands and named them. The French were the first ones to build a settlement which is ultimately the only thing that really counts. The Spanish then made justice on their original territorial claim and officially bought whatever rights the French had earned, which entitled them to kick the British off the Western Island. And 2, by the time Britain "lay its unlawful claim", they were already Spanish Territory, in fact the British knew this and thought they could try to get away with sneaking in Port Egmont anyways, and yet eventually yielded back to Spain and abandoned Port Egmont. In fact evidence of a robbing policy is the fact that they never went back to Port Egmont, but took the Islands from the Argentine on the Eastern Island which they had never set foot on. The British left as always antagonistically, because all they've ever done in this world is bring discord fight and war to the peaceful existence of people. While Spain was at that point still in the process of civilizing the old world giving equal rights under god to all people in conquered. Very different to how Britain treated its colonized subjects it would put to work for his Majesty, take their resources and managed the business "their way" through slaves and so forth. Spain did not have "colonies," that word comes from English History. Spain made province type autonomous territories often with local governors. The Southern Cone and Malvinas was part of the Viceroyalty of the River Plate, with capital in BUENOS AIRES. We had the strongest world currency, and Britain basically was jealous and wanted to undermine and have all that Spain had earned. The Viceroyalty, became the United Provinces with capital in BUENOS AIRES, and the United Provinces became Argentina with capital, Buenos Aires.
When Spain retreated in 1811 from the Malvinas because of Argentina, Argentina rightfully inherited its abandoned territories through its victory. No one in South America contests that, that's why they all support the Argentine claim (unless they want to kiss the IMF, the U.S. or U.K.'s ass.
Britain did not seize the Islands upon Spain's retreat, it waited for the right contextual situation, lied to Argentina like a thief about being its ally, while it forcefully removed the Islands Argentinian loyal occupants during a key moment of weakness caused by ... no other than the U.S. pirate attack on Puerto Soledad. Why? Because they did not want laws and rules, they wanted to scavenge. The U.S. and U.K. are famous for tag team robbing territories, like they did with Diego Garcia, the Virgin Islands and other Caribbean "situations".
It looks to me you have been exclusively educated by the British propagandist narrative taught to the British people and the Islanders; because you seem to know nothing other that what concerns Britain's convenient version of events, though self servingly false it may be. Like what is currently taught about WW2, "my little savoir of the world, liberator of the Jews hero" LOL lol In fact, the English language is today definitely the greatest producer of lies in human history out of all the world's literary history, and people in both America and the England are both starting to admit that. Luckily. Unfortunately uncovering the unforgivable truth of the millions both our countries have murdered in order to control AND USE the world. You don't actually believe Galtieri was stupid enough to go straight into a losing war do you? You do, don't you? Just like you believe Britain came reaaaaaallyyy close to not winning that war. LOL
Perhaps ... caring more about your own education would be my advice to you.
Patrick Edgar Regini - The problem with that argument is that when Argentina tried to assert control over the islands, they captured South Georgia. There is zero Argentine or Spanish history in South Georgia to support an Argentine claim. South Georgia history is 100% British until the 1982 invasion. It all comes down to this: Argentina tried to take territory from the UK by force, thinking nothing could be done about it. The result was war, in which Argentina was soundly defeated. That settles the matter, as far as I am concerned.
If Argentina ever attacks again, I hope the UK will have the means and the will to destroy every military base in Argentina. I would rather there was peace. That will come when Argentina formally relinquishes their phony claims.
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini Well just take a look at the counties left behind from UK-SPANISH colonialism.....
UK = USA , CANADA, AUSTRALIA, NEW ZEALAND.
SPAIN = Corrupt shitholes.
Fuck of bitches, Falkland British forever I want to remain British living in the Falklands
Ya vamos a recuperarlas y apoderarnos de sus mujeres de las islas !!
jajajajaja
Son frías, se hacen las sexys pero no te calientan mucho, al menos las yankis anglas . Las probé en Usa
Típico del medio oriente fanáticos y violadores
@@alejandroroke3362 hayy. Que paso ? Un arabe te robo tu mujer ??
Pensamiento de asesino el tuyo por eso Isarel los castiga a cada rato , por irrespetuosos
Me embarga la impotencia malditos sean
La culpa no es de ellos...en parte también es de nuestros políticos hdp's ladrones!!!
@@pablolasowski2831 Es una tragedia terrible la forma en que los argentinos, un buen pueblo, han sido adoctrinados para ver a las Malvinas como territorio esencial. Los británicos solo quieren dejar a los kelpers para vivir sus vidas, pero la agresión y la actitud colonial significa que estos trabajos son necesarios para proteger a estas personas pacíficas que no amenazan a nadie.
@@jimmyhillschin9987 me parece interesante tu visión, es respetable y hay verla desde un arista e interpretarla porque también es valida!!! Saludos.
Jimmy Hill's Chin puede que las personas sean pacíficas, pero las verdaderas personas pacíficas dueñas de ese territorio fueron asesinadas por los ingleses y los Kelpers que ves como pacificos no son mas que una semilla que aseguró a UK las islas.
@@joaquin2966 La dominación española en América del Sur estaba asegurada por ríos de sangre. Comparado con esto, lo que sucedió en las Malvinas no es nada.
Rivales británicos gracias por mantenernos las islas gratis 👍👋🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷
Britannia invicta 🇬🇧
Sueñen qué serán suyas algún día. Falkland, Malvinas no existen
Colas Typhoon
Are it’s an ad👎🏽
Go home britihs soldiers go home...
Piratas, fak rats...!!!!! Go home...!🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀
Malvinas !!! The english are Piratys
they are home.love britain.god save the queen .falkland islanders we have your backs.by the way argentina you owe the uk money for the 1982 war you waged.
Gar
Are you Gar or Gay ??
The second
Lmao, on the subject of rats, how about all those drowned rats on the Belgrano? Biggest loss of life in the entire war 😂
Look forward to Argentina's second invasion, you may have lied about how many of you died last time, but I look forward to hearing about more of you dying next time.
I wonder who screamed louder, the cowards that the gurkhas slowly cut to pieces with their knives, or the whore mothers of the Argie soldiers when they found out their spawn had died 😂😘
Linda pista se ve fasilmente , inutilizable por saturacion
@UC47ffkI5n1OlDjzThXVXVvg
We should be angry, in fact Argentina is not angry enough in my opinion.
This is a conflict that has to do with the world's countries honoring and respecting each other as equal nations entitled to the same mature
acknowledgment of every issue that would be important to ones own nation.
When you stop reading only British sourced material, and learn what actually happened on the Falkland Malvinas Islands, not the
narrative the English language consciously has been disseminating and indirectly educating the world with, you see that there is indeed a strong argument on behalf of Argentina in terms of them having had earned greater sovereignty right to the islands by 1820 than Britain possessed at that point, by political definition. However Britain, as it considers its wishes and wants above any notion of respect and equality among the nations the world, has always used its far greater wealth and military power to incur invade meddle with and intervene in South America (and the world) in particular Argentina. ...I bet you have no idea how many military incursions Britain carried out against
Argentina throughout history.
Britain knew Argentina had a strong case in 1833 for the islands now being rightfully belonging to their administration, but instead of
arguing and settling with them by recognizing Argentina's case and their own governments absence neglect and lesser political substance of their own claim, which originated in its confrontation against Spain for colonial domination of the islands, while Argentina though it appeared in the dispute last in terms of it being a Republic, came to the scene with the islands already put within the government of Buenos Aires's administration by Spain since 1776, and was the first country to endow the islands with and actual integral national sovereignty, and "a possible colonial claim". I bet you didn't know that either. Nonetheless, Britain simply decided to forcefully take them from Argentina at a moment it could not defend itself in part because it had just recently been unjustly and abusively attacked by the
United States.
Never in 150 years until 1982 did Britain ever take Argentina seriously nor respected their continual protests and claim
enough to truly mean to pursue an honorable resolution and settlement to the conflict, offensively blackmailing the country with commercial favor and phony friendship in exchange for silence over the dispute. It immediately proceeded to create a strategy to forge the islands away from Argentina while ignorning the dispute; a ploy fake construct of legitimacy which cleverly changed the notions of "invasive colony or occupation" to the term "British Overseas Territory". Britain then used principals which would have been inapplicable to a political international dispute and conflicted situation through putting its own people on the islands as a human shield and then vesting their significance with values of sovereignty like "right to self determination". By doing this Britain intentionally confused the situaion and silence the real argument by still to this day painting over the past and true history of usurpation of an Argentine territory and making it about a colonial situation, misinforming the world and keeping it from paying attention to the real history that occurred, and other facts like for example that the islanders were brought to the islands after expelling Argentina for the purpose of having them fight for the right to the islands when the time came. This is how London attempts to avoid facing justice for its actions making it a situation to do with "a non self governing territory's people decision", rather than the truth which was an action committed against Argentina on Argentine territory, giving rise to this dispute born in 1833. In other words, Britain would have people believe this is about two countries fighting over an independent piece of land, when what actually occurred is that Argentina had incorporated to its territory a geographically necessarily belonging part of land that had been disputed between Britain and Spain, and that ultimately Britain being on the other side of the globe, de-prioritized and never managed to settle and establish administration on, nor of it, having been present on the islands for barely four years 50 years prior to Argentina's official inclusion to its territory.
You can see British strategy still going on today, by for example noticing how Britain was quick to make sure that the headlines the world read in 1982 and everything that would be said thereafter never told the story that the Junta invaded in order to recuperate these islands that were occupied by Britain in 1833 after expelling the Argentinians off them first, nor that it was Britain who decided to use the force of war in 1982 once more to take them from Argentina. Argentina did not start a war in 1982, it merely took back and recuperated territory that had been taken from them originally. Britain never sought a peaceful resolution, because it needed the action to be seen as an attack on its territory so that it had an excuse to create a war on the islands. The British intentionally educate people to believe their strategic narrative through the selection of phrases like "Argentina invaded British territory".
Through explanations of political principals on of how for example they run their British Overseas Territories, Britain audaciously is looking to change in front of everyone's noses the definition and description of international matters such as colonial expansionism, by using and fake prioritizing the importance of the residents of these places, so that essentially it can hide its own objectives and get away with stealing, while it has the world believe it behaves nobly.
Very informative,but the "brass tacks" are that the majority of the People who live on the Islands see themselves as British.Sadly what happened in the 1800's doesn't have much bearing in 2021.The French don't have a problem with the Channel Islands being part of the UK.......and they are SO much nearer to France than Argentina is to the Falklands.Its not like Argentina is overpopulated......is it?Maybe the Argentinians will control "Las Malvinas" one day,but it will only happen once the "Brits" have left the Falklands.
@@alanstevens8896
This conflict dispute is historical, and based on an event of forceful usurpation that was diplomatically never forgiven by Argentina. It is not about the war to recuperate the islands in 1982, nor about the islanders themselves. If anything the islanders should be complaining to Britain about putting them intentionally in harms way not just once, but twice!
If we are to respect each other as nations in this world, nations of equal right to be acknowledged and honored, things can not be as you and your country are attempting to forge and twist them. The principle of a people's right to self determination may very well be an issue between the islanders and London, but not between the islanders and Argentina as the conflict is between the British and the Argentinians. The islanders do not fit the qualification of an integrally autonomous sovereignty of themselves, and thus nor are they relevant to the list of non self governing territories at the U.N, as they have always been since their arrival on the islands willingly under British rule and moreover brought to the islands to serve in the purpose of unlawful expansionism by shielding London from having to deal before the world with Argentina about their denouncement of this territory they consider robbed from them. ... You and your country can keep trying to re-define this matter, attempt to bury events concerning Argentina and its right to nationhood, you can keep trying to turn this into some politically capricious contemporary matter centered around the war of 82 and the islanders falsely accusing Argentina of, but the facts about it, the fact that neither Britain nor the United States possessed any right to attack and remove the lawfully established Argentine settlement in 1820, are never going to change as they have been laid down already in history by all the recorded events concerning all three countries, therefore unchangeable.
Patrick,you are obviously a well educated man,unlike me who only went to a "Secondary Modern" School.The ultimate irony there is that someone I know,who is a few years older than me was with Colonel H Jones of the 2nd Battalion the Parachute Regiment who lost his life whilst in the Falklands,during the war there in 1982.So Britain has run the Falklands since 1833,nearly 190 years.So you are saying that Britain "stole" the Islands from Argentina in 1820.Can't argue with that,only alot of Countries were invading other ones at that time.Lets see now,I believe that the ethnic origin of nearly 97% of Argentinians is European.By the way,my ethnicity is 91.7% English,and 8.3% Scandinavian.So you can say that my ancestors are English.....and have been for a very long time.I would imagine that the original occupants of Argentina would have been native Indians? So when Spain conquered Argentina,they must have killed alot of the "Natives" in the process? So pray tell me,what's the difference between that,and Britain booting out Argentinians from the Falklands in 1820? They had nearly 150 years to win them back,so why did it take until 1982 for that to happen? While we're on the subject of not very nice People;what about the fact that between 1939 to 1945,Britain and her Allies were trying to save the World from one Adolf Hitler,whilst Argentinian was giving the Nazis shelter? Rumour has it that Hitler fled to Argentina after the War,lived there for many years,then went to Chile I believe,and died there in 1971.....personally I don't believe that,but I saw it on a TV programme recently,and the person who said that was.......Argentinian.I have no argument with the Argentinian People,who I believe are very hospitable,and kind.The Falklands War can be blamed on one person......General Galtieri,who was a Dictator,in trouble at the time,and thought...."I know a way out of my problems....."I'll invade the Malvinas,and get it back for Argentina .......thus making me,VERY POPULAR." The rest Patrick...is History.
@@alanstevens8896 You touched on too many different things to give you just one response to your comment Alan. There are about 10 different points that we could argue each one of them in terms of what it was all really about. If the world is going to "work it out" and solve its political sovereignty issues and confrontations, we have to draw a line somewhere, somewhere sensible where we can work with realities still existing and comprehensibly represented. That would mean all modern nations today represented at the United Nations. Otherwise we could keep moving the bar back to oblivion in the necessary premise of seeking justice for everyone, not just a few of us. In this sense the old civilizations destroyed by the Spanish, Portuguese, English, French, Dutch and Germans are too far gone and dissolved to draw any reasonable construction of justice through representation. That's why people like the Mapuche in Chile and Argentina are shouting a bunch of lies based on righteous sounding ideologies that in truth would not be about these arbitrarily mixed people. On the other hand, Britain and Argentina were both here in their present form during the 1830's, during the creation of the U.N. and now. Is war the answer to you? Shouldn't we be praising Argentina for patiently hanging on the diplomatic means for 187 years already? Isn't that what supposedly the world and countries like Britain purport to want for the world? To resolve things diplomatically? The point is about respecting each and looking for a just way to end conflicts, and seek a fair compensating solution, like split the islands in half for example, not exploit one's superior military and economic power to disrespect and ignore the importance a people give a historical conflict that is about land taken from that people. What your logic is proposing is that as a world we should say to countries that are weaker poorer and needier of good relations with others to whom injustice was committed to by a stronger one, "oh well!! tough! get over it!" Do you think that is how countries should drive the world forward? By the law of the jungle?
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini Patrick,I don't think that War is the answer to problems,but sometimes it appears that is the only course of action available......sadly.As long as the People on the Falklands/Malvinas want to stay British,I can't see any other solution to the issue,than they stay as they are.Can't remember if I mentioned this to you,but here goes.I don't know if you are aware of the Channel Islands just off the Coast of France,but they are British.We are not talking 400 miles here,more like 30 or more.France could try and claim them,but they haven't as far as I know.On one of the Islands....Jersey,they speak "Jersey French," which is a mixture of French and English.There are quite a few French place names on Jersey,maybe the French think,as their Country is so big.......they don't need any more Land.Argentina is very big as well,unlike the UK which is overcrowded,and not very big,with a population of about 60 Million.
Why all this expense for a barren rock? I’ve heard there is oil in the waters, so why don’t they drill already. I don’t understand this waste of resources
They have been drilling. Look up Rockhopper.
malvinas parlebu france exocet
Me hiciste la noche con ese comentario. Te pasaste 🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂
@@eldurkiiipetruski7896 No, es que encima es solo para entendidos, porque hay que averiguar lo que fue el uso del exocet!! Tremendo!!! me reia solo a la madrugada 😂😂
@@nicolasmartinelli1584 como no saber la historia q marco al mundo....
@Gar Ladrón usupador que seguramente no hablas castellano sometete a la ONU si no te gusta el exhocet Pensa en el Condor
Ocupas Las Malvinas son Argentinas
Y si son tan argentinas por que los argentinos no pueden entrar sin pasaporte 🤔🤔🤔
Come and get them coward
Malvinas son y seran por siempre argentinaa es sólo cuestion de tiempo, no importa si es hoy o mañana simplemente esperar el momento.
Soberanía BRITANICA TIENE BUENA ECONOMÍA POR SU GOBIERNO BRITÁNICO argentina ESTANCADA COMO SUDAMÉRICA
la plataforma marina es argentina... legalmente es argentina... un abogado comun en una corte mundial imparcial gana el juicio y la tienen que devolver mas todo los costos en robar el pescado y el petroleo...
obrbob194 I’m shocked... really shocked you said that! As a fellow Brit, what you SHOULD have said is “come on then, if you think you’re ‘ard enough”. lol. 😉
@@DukeOfChirk las malvinas son argentinas...
Argies only showed interest in the Falklands when it became clear there were under water mining options, greedy lying toe rags ...
Las Malvinas son Argentinas. Saudações do Brasil 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷. Saludos hermanos.
Nope
Good joke loser 😂
Still British!
MALVINAS ARGENTINAS🇦🇷
MIS RESPETOS A LOS SOLDADOS BRITANICOS QUE PERDIERON SUS VIDAS EN NUESTRAS MALVINAS...
@Gar ....mr, Engkis, so,eday we will see each other again , those are our lamds and you know it let,s avoid another war...MALVINAS ARGENTINAS,. MY RESPECTS TO THE INGLISH SOLDIERS WHO LOST THEIR LIVES.-
@@cesarwaltermigueles9562 Please don't test Britain in war , we are very experienced at it ...let's hope Argentina will move on and get its own affairs in order .
Malvinas argentinas 🤡🤡🤡
British Falklands! 🇬🇧
Let's hope we don't have to kill anymore Argentines in the name of freedom!
and
"The Shameful War"
@Gar
I see you don't understand why it was one of Britain's most dishonorable wars...
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini Please explain ?
@@loyalist5736
Argentina is not a warring country. Yet nonetheless it's one of the family of nations that are constantly bamboozled by the British and Americans after being foolish enough to think they needed to let themselves be lead by these two powers after winning their wars of independence. Britain has never been a friend to the Argentinians, though there are still convinced you have been, but the truth is that Britain has always tried to use and fool Argentina, both countries the U.S. and U.K, think of all of the ex Spanish Empire nations with insufferable bigotry and contempt. I know it because I grew up in America and I know very well how 'we' and you think about Hispanic countries. Britain has always exploited invasively Argentina's friendship and defenselessness, seeking always to first put its foot in through political and commercial relationships. Starting in 1806 and 1807, in 1845 and in 1982 as well though on the outside no one officially sees it that way. WHY!?? What has Argentina ever done to Britain?? 1982 was the only time there was a military backlash against 150 of insolence, ignoring our diplomatic protests. The military occupation exploited the sentiment of desired justice for the usurpation of 1833 in the Argentine people, but your bigotry completely intoxicates your narratives and story telling, it made sure to never treat that event as a territorial dispute more than token mentions. It constructed the international story as an invasion of British territory, though it wasn't. Nothing new in that relationship, one that is saturated with political manipulation, even supporting of the Generals during the 70's genocidal attack on their population. Britain abuses and uses Hispanic passivity and self weakness, their lack of confidence in themselves, from Belice to Jamaica, Cuba and Venezuela, Ecuador, you used Chile against Bolivia, Brazil against Argentina... Britain truly is the only enemy we have ever had, and its an lying enemy in disguise. Can you tell me WHY?? Why can't your country get its bloody claws out of our continent? Why does it want to contest everything that is part of our world? Always having something to say, something to meddle in!! You want ALL OF ANTARTICA! Even the part that is directly below Argentina? WhY? Why do you feel you have more right than others to this world? You're pigs you use friendship to rob the unsuspecting, that's what you've always done! In India, in China, in Africa and in South America. That's why the South Atlantic war for the Malvinas was Britain's war of Shame. Because you knew damn well Galtieri really believed Britain would negotiate, you fooled them and yet again attacked a country that thought of yours as a friend. You're phony users, and there's plenty of material that proves you knew what the Junta was planing and you intentionally let them step on the stick so you could manipulate and subjugate the Argentine people even more. WHY?? Again! What has Argentina ever done to Britain?? Why didn't you ever ask for a peaceful resolution to that conflict!? Because you didn't want one. OK?? You are simply a bastard country full of contempt for the world, except for those countries that are useful war allies too you, because you're users, because to Britain the world is still not a place humanity must share and find a way of living together in peace as equals, it still is the source of its own sustenance, and it covets it like someone who doesn't want others to know what they found.
@@loyalist5736 Do you still need more details? Do you think Britain did not know Argentina could not last more then three months fighting before it ran out of munitions? Do you not think British intelligence new one way or the other it was going to be an easy win, and that the U.S. was not going to make sure the U.K. won? Argentina rejected any real assistance by other countries. You should be ashamed of yourselves! Its soldiers were untrained conscripts from a society that is peaceful, of kids that do not grow up watching war and gore movies nor talking about bombing this country or that country, they are on the opposite end of the spectrum compared to your war mentality society of professional soldiers. Britain practically raped Argentina's innocence, a country that only had admiration and trust for Britain, just so it could have MORE MORE MORE of the world, regardless of justice, but it makes sure to bury that assessment and paint the generic war freedom vs dictators bullshit story. Your country's a disgrace. That's why it was your War of Shame. It was as easy as robbing from your own family, or rapped your best friend. This is the main reason why you try to make sure there is no distinction made between the Constitutional Nation and its people's cultural society "country", and the only ones who actually were responsible for using force to take back the islands, and who sprung the event secretly behind their people's backs, the Junta's Generals. The Argentinians never in a million years would have ever even thought of anything militaristic against Britain, even in fantasy they saw them as friends and Britain understood that very well. Yet Britain want's to make sure the world and especially the islanders don't understand the realism of that. It needs the islanders to think of Argentina as its enemy. And it makes sure that is the narrative that is installed. One can see this self evidently unfolding since the day the war ended until this very day, with every decision and event that occurs anywhere related to the South Atlantic. The war was needed, it was used, and it is being exploited. Britain always puts its foot in front of Argentina, and in front of any significant political progress towards sovereignty ex Spanish Empire nations attempt. ... It's what the British people are kept in the dark about, believing your fairy tales of merit progress and rightful honor. You're the bully rapists of the planet to be truthful.
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini LOL You can't half babble on about pure shit ....I tripped over blame the British, our economy is shit blame the British banks ..we invaded British territory and lost the war because of it lol ..Argentina were bullying its nabours and thought it could also bully Britain I mean what are they going to do about it so far away ....the rest is history. ...move on .
Malvinas argentinas gibraltar español ulster de Irlanda. Viva la hispanidad e Irlanda. Ingleses fuera de territorios qe no son suyos
Idiot
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧😉👍
This conflict dispute is historical, and based on an event of forceful usurpation that was diplomatically never forgiven by Argentina. It is not about the war to recuperate the islands in 1982, nor about the islanders themselves. If anything the islanders should be complaining to Britain about putting them intentionally in harms way not just once, but twice!
If we are to respect each other as nations in this world, nations of equal right to be acknowledged and honored, things can not be as you and your country are attempting to forge and twist them. The principle of a people's right to self determination may very well be an issue between the islanders and London, but not between the islanders and Argentina as the conflict is between the British and the Argentinians. The islanders do not fit the qualification of an integrally autonomous sovereignty of themselves, and thus nor are they relevant to the list of non self governing territories at the U.N, as they have always been since their arrival on the islands willingly under British rule and moreover brought to the islands to serve in the purpose of unlawful expansionism by shielding London from having to deal before the world with Argentina about their denouncement of this territory they consider robbed from them. ... You and your country can keep trying to re-define this matter, attempt to bury events concerning Argentina and its right to nationhood, you can keep trying to turn this into some politically capricious contemporary matter centered around the war of 82 and the islanders falsely accusing Argentina of, but the facts about it, the fact that neither Britain nor the United States possessed any right to attack and remove the lawfully established Argentine settlement in 1820, are never going to change as they have been laid down already in history by all the recorded events concerning all three countries, therefore unchangeable.
If we are to respect each other lol ...Argentina bully and try to make life as hard as possible for the islanders in many diffrent ways economically mostly and trying to turn other countries in the region against them ..Grow up Argentina.
@@garwhittaker3743
You do realize you are beyond prejudicially bigoted with contempt, right?
It's more like you have a rotting pretzel inside your brain.
@Patrick before Argentine troops were kicked off in 1982 alot of your soldiers shit in people's houses smeared it over peoples walls and even shit in people's beds and draws. ..No wonder they want nothing to do with them .
Menos mal que mostraron dónde quedan porque el pueblo ingles no saben ni de su existencia.
Lmao, that's the dumbest thing I've ever read.
Seriously, does making things up lies like this actually help you get over Argentina's constant failures?
-Failed to negotiate because you're too stupid
-Failed to conquer the islands because you're cowards
-Cannot run an economy to save your lives (and it cost 649+ of your lives 😂)
Why doesn't Argentina try and be less pathetic instead of making up stories and claiming other people's things?
Still British
Sin palabras , piratas
😂😂😂🇬🇧
Fuck off you broke Argentina
MALVINAS !
= Losers
FALKLANDS*
SERAN ARRRRRRRASADOS XXI ARDE ARG HAY QUE
PROBAR NUEVOS ARMAMENTOS UK ARGENTINOS CARNE DE CAÑON
Sorry about your misinformed belief, but NO. It is known that Britain was NOT the first to sight or land on the Islands, the possibilities are a few, including that of Piti Reis the Turkish commander, it is possible that the British were the first to set foot or sail into the canal, as well as not the first. But the Dutch are who are believed to have discovered the Islands and named them. The French were the first ones to build a settlement which is ultimately the only thing that really counts. The Spanish then made justice on their original territorial claim and officially bought whatever rights the French had earned, which entitled them to kick the British off the Western Island. And 2, by the time Britain "lay its unlawful claim", they were already Spanish Territory, in fact the British knew this and thought they could try to get away with sneaking in Port Egmont anyways, and yet eventually yielded back to Spain and abandoned Port Egmont. In fact evidence of a robbing policy is the fact that they never went back to Port Egmont, but took the Islands from the Argentine on the Eastern Island which they had never set foot on. The British left as always antagonistically, because all they've ever done in this world is bring discord fight and war to the peaceful existence of people. While Spain was at that point still in the process of civilizing the old world giving equal rights under god to all people in conquered. Very different to how Britain treated its colonized subjects it would put to work for his Majesty, take their resources and managed the business "their way" through slaves and so forth. Spain did not have "colonies," that word comes from English History. Spain made province type autonomous territories often with local governors. The Southern Cone and Malvinas was part of the Vice-royalty of the Plata River, with capital in BUENOS AIRES. We had the strongest world currency, and Britain basically was jealous and wanted to undermine and have all that Spain had earned. The Vice-royalty, became the United Provinces with capital in BUENOS AIRES, and the United Provinces became Argentina with capital, Buenos Aires. When Spain retreated in 1811 from the Malvinas because of Argentina, Argentina rightfully inherited its abandoned territories through its victory. No one in South America contests that, that's why they all support the Argentine claim (unless they want to kiss the IMF, the U.S. or U.K.'s ass of course). Britain did not seize the Islands upon Spain's retreat, it waited for the right contextual situation, lied to Argentina like a thief about being its ally and friend (same as 82, tag team once more, this time going against the O.A.S.), while it forcefully removed the Islands Argentinian loyal occupants during a key moment of weakness caused by ... no other than the U.S. pirate attack on Puerto Soledad. Why? Because they did not want laws and rules, they wanted to scavenge the land. The U.S. and U.K. are famous for tag team robbing territories, like they did with Diego Garcia, the Virgin Islands and other Caribbean "situations". It looks to me you have been exclusively educated by the British propagandist narrative taught to the British people and the Islanders; because you seem to know nothing other that what concerns Britain's convenient version of events, though self servingly false it may be. Like what is currently taught about WW2, "my little savoir of the world, liberator of the Jews hero" LOL lol In fact, the English language is today definitely the greatest producer of lies in human history out of all the world's literary history, and people in both America and the England are both starting to admit that. Luckily. Unfortunately uncovering the unforgivable truth of the millions both our countries have murdered in order to control AND USE the world. You don't actually believe Galtieri was stupid enough to go straight into a losing war do you? You do, don't you? Just like you believe Britain came reaaaaaallyyy close to not winning that war. LOL Perhaps ... caring more about your own education would be my advice to you.
Britain were first to land and claim so all you say is bullshit.
Stop moaning. The Falkland islanders want to remain British so get over it you bore! Concentrate on issues closer to home eh......god knows you've enough of them.
Islas Malvinas !!!
😂😂😂
Paid with the fish stolen from argentinian sea...
Tonto
sounds fishy, maybe the one that got away?
Wait what? That’s what the EUSSR are doing to us but we have not lost a war.
@@benwilson6145 what like a whole island 😂😂
@@andersonsroad5161 cuando bienen a buscar la docena de barcos que les hundimos??
Pueden hacer las bases que quieran las islas son argentinas..pirate go home kelper go british island
Come and get them cowards.
Maybe form another fascist government while you're at it. The British military can use you for target practice, meanwhile your dictator can murder your citizens like last time.
Efficient pest control for Argies 😘
Islas Malvinas Argentinas
Nope
Good joke 😂
Malvinas Argentinas
Dont be silly.
@@j.boylan3343 No seas arcaico. Estamos en el siglo XXI, por si no te enteraste. Estúpido.
@Gar La razón tiene mucha más fuerza que tus aviones de juguete.
@Gar Usá el traductor de google. Bruto ladrón.
@Gar Pero comprendes lo que digo. Muy bien.
Malvinas*
@Gar ajjajaja idiot
@Gar su-35 + su 34 = malvinas argentinas
@Gar we can blow them up in falklands with condor lol
@Gar traducilo Boludo británico
@Gar que
1982 - today. Las Malvinas son Argentinas
Nope
Good joke 😂
Malvinas argentinas
😂😂😂
las Malvinas fueron son y serán argentinas!!!
Nope
Good joke 😂
Sorry about your misinformed belief, but NO. It is known that Britain was NOT the first to sight or land on the Islands, the possibilities are a few, including that of Piti Reis the Turkish commander, it is possible that the British were the first to set foot or sail into the canal, as well as not the first. But the Dutch are who are believed to have discovered the Islands and named them. The French were the first ones to build a settlement which is ultimately the only thing that really counts. The Spanish then made justice on their original territorial claim and officially bought whatever rights the French had earned, which entitled them to kick the British off the Western Island. And 2, by the time Britain "lay its unlawful claim", they were already Spanish Territory, in fact the British knew this and thought they could try to get away with sneaking in Port Egmont anyways, and yet eventually yielded back to Spain and abandoned Port Egmont. In fact evidence of a robbing policy is the fact that they never went back to Port Egmont, but took the Islands from the Argentine on the Eastern Island which they had never set foot on. The British left as always antagonistically, because all they've ever done in this world is bring discord fight and war to the peaceful existence of people. While Spain was at that point still in the process of civilizing the old world giving equal rights under god to all people in conquered. Very different to how Britain treated its colonized subjects it would put to work for his Majesty, take their resources and managed the business "their way" through slaves and so forth. Spain did not have "colonies," that word comes from English History. Spain made province type autonomous territories often with local governors. The Southern Cone and Malvinas was part of the Vice-royalty of the Plata River, with capital in BUENOS AIRES. We had the strongest world currency, and Britain basically was jealous and wanted to undermine and have all that Spain had earned. The Vice-royalty, became the United Provinces with capital in BUENOS AIRES, and the United Provinces became Argentina with capital, Buenos Aires. When Spain retreated in 1811 from the Malvinas because of Argentina, Argentina rightfully inherited its abandoned territories through its victory. No one in South America contests that, that's why they all support the Argentine claim (unless they want to kiss the IMF, the U.S. or U.K.'s ass of course). Britain did not seize the Islands upon Spain's retreat, it waited for the right contextual situation, lied to Argentina like a thief about being its ally and friend (same as 82, tag team once more, this time going against the O.A.S.), while it forcefully removed the Islands Argentinian loyal occupants during a key moment of weakness caused by ... no other than the U.S. pirate attack on Puerto Soledad. Why? Because they did not want laws and rules, they wanted to scavenge the land. The U.S. and U.K. are famous for tag team robbing territories, like they did with Diego Garcia, the Virgin Islands and other Caribbean "situations". It looks to me you have been exclusively educated by the British propagandist narrative taught to the British people and the Islanders; because you seem to know nothing other that what concerns Britain's convenient version of events, though self servingly false it may be. Like what is currently taught about WW2, "my little savoir of the world, liberator of the Jews hero" LOL lol In fact, the English language is today definitely the greatest producer of lies in human history out of all the world's literary history, and people in both America and the England are both starting to admit that. Luckily. Unfortunately uncovering the unforgivable truth of the millions both our countries have murdered in order to control AND USE the world. You don't actually believe Galtieri was stupid enough to go straight into a losing war do you? You do, don't you? Just like you believe Britain came reaaaaaallyyy close to not winning that war. LOL Perhaps ... caring more about your own education would be my advice to you.
Patrick Edgar Regini - I don’t think the French or the Dutch are involved in the current controversy.
Shut up you screeching mong.
Patrick I hope you don't live in Argentina.
@@loyalist5736 Why? I actually have lived there on several occasions. Once for seven years.
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini Argentina the only country to complain about colonialism when there country is built on it ....a laughing stock.