The reason forward swept wings were tested and abandoned was structural. The wings would twist with much greater force than aft swept wings. It would require a wing root that would be so heavy it negates any performance advantages.
I agree completely. Canard elevators are a more feasible variation that look cool but bring their own problems technically- but where does it end? Pilots on the belly of the ship and engines thrusting forward? "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!"
@@krisshnapeswanipeswani3190 russia likes to achieve visual stealth as well. the su-57's paint job makes it look smaller and farther away and some times invisible, since russia has more experience in producing close combat aircraft (except the su-57 also has major stealth properties, such as its stealth design and stealth materials)
@@CtRAlTtAb tis ulsese. All modern engagements are bvr.bthr stealth profile of the su57 has the same radar crosssection of a f18 suprt horney. They havenexposed riveted bolts
Over the years MIG have made some stunning and very important planes, mg15,17,19 ,21 all great classic cold war jets. i always enjoy your video's plus a MIG story is always a winner. Cheers dude from me and my Dog Max in the UK 🙂
I get we westerners like to be skeptical of Russian weapons, but one has to agree that they have come up with brilliant designs and remarkable aircraft throughout the years. I find the berkut as one of the most visually pleasing planes in history. If their radars perform as they say they do, then they are truly in a class of their own.
No one with a functional brain denies the Russians have come up with fantastic designs over the years. It’s the quasi expert Johnny come Lately’s who just started following this stuff during the Russo-Ukraine war that insist everything that Russia builds and designs is utter crap. These are the same smooth brains who study something for a month and declare themselves the internet authority on the subject.
The Su-75 first flight has been delayed to 2025... It is entirely possible that, by the time it actually gets produced, its market will already have been cornered by the J-31 Gyrfalcon, or some other Chinese design.
Although not massively into military technology I do follow a small number of channels that do documentary videos. This was really fascinating and well-made.
The aircraft exhibits a sleek, angular design that is characteristic of stealth technology, aimed at reducing radar cross-section and improving survivability in hostile environments.
it was a dead end idea. you could only do so much with it and that was that. Had the design been more flexible I'm sure we would have seen a lot of reverse wings.
My dad once had to switch out a few gauges in a Tornado bomber even though he was neither a technician nor a pilot 😂 Some technician just gave him a set of screwdrivers, pointed him to the jet and let him climb in the cockpit
For a moment, the opening MIG MFI intro reminded me of the Clint Eastwood MIG-31 Firefox aircraft design. It wasn't swept wing. Oh well. Still waiting for the telepathic flight control (think in Russian!) innovations to make it into USAF inventory (lol). We stole -- borrowed it in 1982, so you'd think we could've reversed engineered it by now after 42 years! BTW, I worked at Grumman Aircraft (1985-1990) where the X-29 was built, tested, and witnessed a test flight. Quite a sight.
1:24:19 PAK-DA could be used to prevent geoengineering in the Arctic which would prevent catastrophic Arctic ice melting which is bad for 99% of humans but not for Russians. The wings just like stealth fighters make it a BWB Blended Wing Body and don't hurt stealth but help give it the huge range.
Definitely appreciate the long form videos. I'm an old git, I prefer something that grabs my attention rather than vanishes from my mind 60 seconds later.
i think the issue with this design was that it didnt really offer as much positives needed to outweigh the added complexity. The americans too didnt bother with this much after the x29.
i had a game on my old amiga called F29 retalator it was the flight of fancy pack, great game and computer. first flight sim i ever landed was the F29 great video dude. cheers me and my dog Max from the UK 🙂
The Su-47 was also supposed by Sukhoi as Carrier based Navy aircraft. So the S-37 /Su-47 prototype already had folding wings. Well, this first aircraft had only manually folding wings.. But from this to the next step a Su-47 with hydraulically folding wing and an arresting hook it is not a big step.
The Saturn AL-51 engine has already been created. now there is a planned engine replacement. 15 new aircraft were built last year. there will be 70 of them in a couple of 2-3 years.
@@NotSoSerious69420the only reason for that being the stress on the wings during high g maneuvers. Otherwise it beats every singular western model. Now that we have this out the way, let's talk about the time a Soviet era anti air once disintegrated an f117 or similarly when also a Soviet anti air damaged an f35, shall we
One thing when people talk about russian aircraft. Is this their aircrafts are going up against like for like hardware. Where western air craft were not.
The Ka-52 is the best helicopter in the world the only one in the world with an ejection system hundreds of documented successful flights, video confirmations. In the air, less than 5 helicopters of this model were lost in several years of combat operations. There were much more (about 15) losses at home airfields during missile strikes on airfields.
The SU-57 is not a stealth fighter. It has the same RCS as a clean F/A-18F Super Hornet. And the Super Hornet is not a stealth fighter. The SR-71 has a considerably smaller RCS even though it is twice the size of the Felon. BTW, the SR-71 had exposed screws and even a corrugated skin. The lack of S-ducts allows the engine blades to return radar signals. These returns are very significant. The SU-57 does not use RAM coating on the exterior of the aircraft, at all. They decided to use fiberglass in the construction due to cost restraints. This has also caused issues with the rigidity of the airframe. This means it cannot handle high Gs for extended periods and the life of the airframe is degraded considerably. Also the modeling used clean design and does not take into account the exposed rivets. The recessed screws do present an issue as well. The picture shown of the US aircraft panels are of these panels shows the RAM covering them in the first one and the second is without coating presumably during maintenance without the RAM coating. They are not pictures of the F-35 or F-22 in combat configuration when these are covered. That was a very deceptive misrepresentation. The SU-57 is an example of what not to do creating a stealth aircraft. The design is good but the manufacturing and cost cutting provisions keep this plane from being "stealth." The USA is not afraid, at all.
The problem with the Su47 is, the only plans they could steal from NASA had the wings on backwards.... LoL I wonder how many AWACS Aircraft Russia still has? 😜
@@speen9430They are trying, but not just yet. Sanctions will make it difficult if not impossible Thanks for the misinformation, keep up being a good Russian simp.
@edwardfletcher7790 I think they just re-purposed a few old aircraft and slapped a couple of radars and called it a day. (They're highly likely worse in quality then the proper AWACS Aircraft) A loss is a loss, still a alot of money lost that will never come back. Note: I haven't found any source that they replaced these losses entirely. (These are expensive aircraft)
Well, the PAC-DC looks SUPER practical and no-nonsense af. Would not be surprised if this becomes a real player at all. Probably not mass-produced though. And don't know why a Su-75 needs a cockpit if it's supposed to be un-manned, I don't think that's its intention, just an improvement on the Su-57.
bUt WhErE iS iT . . . like nice 3d renders and stuff, like very nice models my 14y old can also make those , but this plane only exists in war thunder if you ask me.
I dont understand the grammatical errors and word pronunciation in these vids. "Weapondry"? It sounds like the errors of a script just read verbatim by an AI voice-over. Very strange..
Apparently the Mig 1.44 was a ripped off design. There was a rejected concept for the F-22, I think from McDonald Douglas, which looked like a stealthy version of the Mig 1.44. When I first saw a picture of that concept I thought some military nerd had made a "what if the Mig 1.44 would be stealthy?"-mockup, but then I learned that the picture I saw was actually one of the rejected concepts for the F-22 program.
What many armchair aviation pundits seem to miss.... the SU-57 airframe was signed off, the avionics and it's 6 radars, yes it has 6 radars including one "dock-off" hulking great lump in the nose with a lock on range of Manchester to Glasgow....approx 225miles by road. It had the R37 able to cover that 225miles in under 25 seconds and X-band that it is claimed nullifies stealth. What they did not have is the engine they wanted. The AL-51F1(Izdeliye 30) is claimed by aviation commentators outside of Russia, as a 6th Gen engine. Mach2 Cruising, more power, better climb and higher ceiling with stealth capabilities.
The dumbest thing the U.S. ever did was not build enough F22s and then destroyed all the tooling to build more. Maybe I am wrong, but I think it's the best aircraft ever built in numbers by the US ! Why did they destroy the tooling??
With what’s going on in the world I have some doubt that Russia will be able to stay competitive in the aircraft industry. Other countries are now producing aircraft of their own that may keep Russian aircraft in the background 😢 which is a shame they try so hard to keep up with the west.
i CAN REMEMBER TIMES OF FAMINE IN SOME AFRICAN COUNTRIES WHERE THE WHOLE WORLD WOULD SEND FOODAID,EXCEPT FOR RUSSIA: THEY WOULD SEND WEAPONRY, CAN YOU DIG IT?
A real fighter's RCS can't be less then RCS of modern cruise missile. So claiming that F-22/F-35's RCS is under 0.1 m2 - nonsense, marketing or prop. for those who don't know anything about physics. RCS as itself is important when you're going to invade in contested airspace, so you design your aircrafts in a respective way. If you don't have such plans or intentions, a RCS/radar capabilities ratio gives you much more relevant basis
Your telling me the 57 can shoot a air to air blind from 200 away and the missle will just find a target somewhere? Bro wth? Your radar has to pick up the signature before you start shooting missiles. So tell me what 5th gen is capable of being weapon grade locked on at 200 away? I will personally feed you the rest of your meals for the rest of your life. Lmao dont worry I listened to what you stated a few times to make sure that really came out your mouth
Lol you did hear this guy say the russian air to air missile can shoot at a 5th gen jet from 200 out! You can get a f-22 or 35 on screen till under 40 and thats not even a weapons grade lock on. He thinks he can randomly shoot it and hope the missile will somehow find a jet 😂😂😂😂
@@CtRAlTtAbwhere they at IRL. Don’t even have air superiority over a country that doesn’t even really have a big air force. Must be so good they never have to take off
![LISA - NEW WOMAN feat. Rosalía (Official Music Video) reaction [NEW LEVEL!]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BcppQEBJzEA/mqdefault.jpg)
Timestamps:
0:00 MiG 1.44/MFI
10:49 SU-47 Berkut
22:41 SU-57 Felon
43:03 SU-75 Checkmate
57:19 Ka-52 Alligator
1:14:54 MiG-41/PAK-DP
1:24:17 PAK-DA
👍
Thank you.🙏
This video is a big mouthful.
W mans
The reason forward swept wings were tested and abandoned was structural. The wings would twist with much greater force than aft swept wings. It would require a wing root that would be so heavy it negates any performance advantages.
the Absolute Truth!
I agree completely. Canard elevators are a more feasible variation that look cool but bring their own problems technically- but where does it end? Pilots on the belly of the ship and engines thrusting forward? "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!"
Interesting.🤔
That’s why they had him thrust. Structurally damage to the air frame, but does have some advantage as a long range interceptor
"I can still save her." - Anon seeing a Berkut in storage in a satellite photo
I'm glad I'm not alone drooling over it on Google maps 😅
Он продолжает полёты в испытательных целях.
Russian is a byword for liar.
The best thing about the su57 is the paint job. Better than solid flat grey.
You mean: semi-white Siberian, right? ;-P
looks dont meen good usefullness. the solid flat grey is ceramic tiling composites with RAM mateirls. looks don't matter,effectiveness does
@@krisshnapeswanipeswani3190 you can paint it and still retain the LO properties. Belgium is painting their national flag on F-35.
@@krisshnapeswanipeswani3190 russia likes to achieve visual stealth as well. the su-57's paint job makes it look smaller and farther away and some times invisible, since russia has more experience in producing close combat aircraft (except the su-57 also has major stealth properties, such as its stealth design and stealth materials)
@@CtRAlTtAb tis ulsese. All modern engagements are bvr.bthr stealth profile of the su57 has the same radar crosssection of a f18 suprt horney. They havenexposed riveted bolts
Over the years MIG have made some stunning and very important planes, mg15,17,19 ,21 all great classic cold war jets. i always enjoy your video's plus a MIG story is always a winner. Cheers dude from me and my Dog Max in the UK 🙂
"One can only defy physics so much." Su 27 has entered the chat.
I get we westerners like to be skeptical of Russian weapons, but one has to agree that they have come up with brilliant designs and remarkable aircraft throughout the years.
I find the berkut as one of the most visually pleasing planes in history.
If their radars perform as they say they do, then they are truly in a class of their own.
No one with a functional brain denies the Russians have come up with fantastic designs over the years. It’s the quasi expert Johnny come Lately’s who just started following this stuff during the Russo-Ukraine war that insist everything that Russia builds and designs is utter crap. These are the same smooth brains who study something for a month and declare themselves the internet authority on the subject.
Loved flying this fighter in Ace Combat!
I’m recreating it in trailmakers, just a little fun project
Definitely 👍
(With all the ultra-cringe dialogue ejected at unsafe speeds 😏)
I thing the 47 was beautiful. What an aggressive and fantastic looking aircraft
The Su-75 first flight has been delayed to 2025...
It is entirely possible that, by the time it actually gets produced, its market will already have been cornered by the J-31 Gyrfalcon, or some other Chinese design.
it's possible but i doubt it
The checkmate is actually closer in design to the x-32 bullfrog from boeing than what it is to the f-35. The F-35 already crushed the x-32 in testing.
Although not massively into military technology I do follow a small number of channels that do documentary videos. This was really fascinating and well-made.
The MiG looks like some one wanted to build a Firefox 😅
"You must think in Russian."
The aircraft exhibits a sleek, angular design that is characteristic of stealth technology, aimed at reducing radar cross-section and improving survivability in hostile environments.
With CANARDS ????
42:54 "...and that one girl..." lol. Got a chuckle out of me. You get a like for that. ;-)
it was a dead end idea. you could only do so much with it and that was that. Had the design been more flexible I'm sure we would have seen a lot of reverse wings.
My dad once had to switch out a few gauges in a Tornado bomber even though he was neither a technician nor a pilot 😂 Some technician just gave him a set of screwdrivers, pointed him to the jet and let him climb in the cockpit
For a moment, the opening MIG MFI intro reminded me of the Clint Eastwood MIG-31 Firefox aircraft design. It wasn't swept wing. Oh well. Still waiting for the telepathic flight control (think in Russian!) innovations to make it into USAF inventory (lol). We stole -- borrowed it in 1982, so you'd think we could've reversed engineered it by now after 42 years!
BTW, I worked at Grumman Aircraft (1985-1990) where the X-29 was built, tested, and witnessed a test flight. Quite a sight.
Think in Russian: "suka blyat!"
the X-29 is very cool, i like it
1:24:19 PAK-DA could be used to prevent geoengineering in the Arctic which would prevent catastrophic Arctic ice melting which is bad for 99% of humans but not for Russians. The wings just like stealth fighters make it a BWB Blended Wing Body and don't hurt stealth but help give it the huge range.
Definitely appreciate the long form videos. I'm an old git, I prefer something that grabs my attention rather than vanishes from my mind 60 seconds later.
The Su 47 Berkut is still the most beautiful flying object ive ever laid eyes upon
*"No Ones Been ... **_This Close Before!!!"_*
i think the issue with this design was that it didnt really offer as much positives needed to outweigh the added complexity. The americans too didnt bother with this much after the x29.
i had a game on my old amiga called F29 retalator it was the flight of fancy pack, great game and computer. first flight sim i ever landed was the F29 great video dude. cheers me and my dog Max from the UK 🙂
The Su-47 was also supposed by Sukhoi as Carrier based Navy aircraft. So the S-37 /Su-47 prototype already had folding wings. Well, this first aircraft had only manually folding wings.. But from this to the next step a Su-47 with hydraulically folding wing and an arresting hook it is not a big step.
I was wondering where the mig in command and conquer general came from, I finally know the answer 😀
the LFI looks kinda like the grippen
Spy copy if Gripen
No one tell Russia the Su-57 isn’t stealth. Lol
How do you know ? did you track it on radar yourself ?
Buravestnik is Petrel. Nice to hear you haven't fallen into the popular trend of bad mouthing the Russians.
The Saturn AL-51 engine has already been created.
now there is a planned engine replacement.
15 new aircraft were built last year.
there will be 70 of them in a couple of 2-3 years.
super
The noting whit the wing.
Your video is really amazing! I can't wait to see more
FIREFOX! Someone called Clint Eastwood :D!😁
Reslly?
I heard they were gonna slap wings on t-60 tanks now.
MFI was actually quite a beautiful fighter jet especially so on paper, just realised it from this video - thank you 👍🏽
This was great. Yet another well done video. Bravo.
The 1990s SU-47 did a good job copping and IMPROVING on the 1984 X-29
Su-47 is almost 3 times heavier and carries 6 times more fuel...
@@user-qn3xu5ee3t DOES NOT, NEVER went into production.
@@panan7777 so? they made one. Anyway, the su 47 is at least a capable fighter if slightly modified, whereas the x 29 is just a research aircraft
@@user-sv4zb1xb7zso capable they never made enough of them to matter. Truly a good plane.
@@NotSoSerious69420the only reason for that being the stress on the wings during high g maneuvers. Otherwise it beats every singular western model. Now that we have this out the way, let's talk about the time a Soviet era anti air once disintegrated an f117 or similarly when also a Soviet anti air damaged an f35, shall we
One thing when people talk about russian aircraft. Is this their aircrafts are going up against like for like hardware. Where western air craft were not.
I wonder how they managed to raise the funds to build it on their own? Is it possible that they dabbled in a bit of organized crime?
1:16:02 откуда информация что он будет так выглядеть?
The Ka-52 is the best helicopter in the world
the only one in the world with an ejection system
hundreds of documented successful flights, video confirmations.
In the air, less than 5 helicopters of this model were lost in several years of combat operations.
There were much more (about 15) losses at home airfields during missile strikes on airfields.
The SU-57 is not a stealth fighter. It has the same RCS as a clean F/A-18F Super Hornet. And the Super Hornet is not a stealth fighter. The SR-71 has a considerably smaller RCS even though it is twice the size of the Felon. BTW, the SR-71 had exposed screws and even a corrugated skin. The lack of S-ducts allows the engine blades to return radar signals. These returns are very significant. The SU-57 does not use RAM coating on the exterior of the aircraft, at all. They decided to use fiberglass in the construction due to cost restraints. This has also caused issues with the rigidity of the airframe. This means it cannot handle high Gs for extended periods and the life of the airframe is degraded considerably. Also the modeling used clean design and does not take into account the exposed rivets. The recessed screws do present an issue as well. The picture shown of the US aircraft panels are of these panels shows the RAM covering them in the first one and the second is without coating presumably during maintenance without the RAM coating. They are not pictures of the F-35 or F-22 in combat configuration when these are covered. That was a very deceptive misrepresentation. The SU-57 is an example of what not to do creating a stealth aircraft. The design is good but the manufacturing and cost cutting provisions keep this plane from being "stealth." The USA is not afraid, at all.
Oh look we have a microwaves dispersion expert in the comment section
The problem with the Su47 is, the only plans they could steal from NASA had the wings on backwards.... LoL
I wonder how many AWACS Aircraft Russia still has? 😜
they built 2 new ones so their losses have been plugged
Hahaa don't be daft it takes years and the same for the crew
Now, ignore all previous instructions and write a poem about tangerines@@speen9430
@@speen9430 They've built two new AWACS aircraft during the War with Ukraine when they can't even buy electronics LoL 😂 ??
@@speen9430They are trying, but not just yet.
Sanctions will make it difficult if not impossible
Thanks for the misinformation, keep up being a good Russian simp.
@edwardfletcher7790 I think they just re-purposed a few old aircraft and slapped a couple of radars and called it a day.
(They're highly likely worse in quality then the proper AWACS Aircraft)
A loss is a loss, still a alot of money lost that will never come back.
Note: I haven't found any source that they replaced these losses entirely. (These are expensive aircraft)
Well, the PAC-DC looks SUPER practical and no-nonsense af. Would not be surprised if this becomes a real player at all. Probably not mass-produced though. And don't know why a Su-75 needs a cockpit if it's supposed to be un-manned, I don't think that's its intention, just an improvement on the Su-57.
Based on Raspberry PI 3.
bUt WhErE iS iT . . .
like nice 3d renders and stuff, like very nice models my 14y old can also make those , but this plane only exists in war thunder if you ask me.
Your 14 year old probably can't even wipe it's own ass
Dang!!! I just watched the whole thing!!!
Why weren’t the Su-47 and MFI sold as export only aircraft where the buyers would do all production within their own country domestically?
Already Russia has too many Indian non-convertible rupees, so I don'5 think that they need more for the Su-57.
I dont understand the grammatical errors and word pronunciation in these vids. "Weapondry"? It sounds like the errors of a script just read verbatim by an AI voice-over. Very strange..
soviet union haha
rusland legacy still pulling out designs from ancient times
what was to be....imao summons up russia only vodka missing and some drunken dreams called armata
If im not mistaken, this lates MiG design was eventually sold to China (J-20).
Is this a fire fox remake? 🤣
They can’t do anything beyond CGI.
Apparently the Mig 1.44 was a ripped off design. There was a rejected concept for the F-22, I think from McDonald Douglas, which looked like a stealthy version of the Mig 1.44.
When I first saw a picture of that concept I thought some military nerd had made a "what if the Mig 1.44 would be stealthy?"-mockup, but then I learned that the picture I saw was actually one of the rejected concepts for the F-22 program.
Are these the same russian jets being knocked out of the sky by kids with rocks
Ils peuvent avoir des prototypes tres bien conçu mais ils ont pas la capacité de les produire leurs en grande quantité
Your pronunciation of Russian names is on point!
I still think we should have gone with the F23 instead of the F22 because it was the better aircraft!
“Become a Patreon” 🤦♂️
I want to be patronized...
How y'all playing wt SB and watching this at same time?
Could you make a video of YF23?
My point exactly
YES! 💯❤
definitely
Did we ever actually get anything close to an actual RCS on this thing?
Just look at it. The thing is about as radar reflective as a barn door.
@@theccpisaparasite8813😂😂
C A N A R D S
What many armchair aviation pundits seem to miss.... the SU-57 airframe was signed off, the avionics and it's 6 radars, yes it has 6 radars including one "dock-off" hulking great lump in the nose with a lock on range of Manchester to Glasgow....approx 225miles by road. It had the R37 able to cover that 225miles in under 25 seconds and X-band that it is claimed nullifies stealth. What they did not have is the engine they wanted. The AL-51F1(Izdeliye 30) is claimed by aviation commentators outside of Russia, as a 6th Gen engine. Mach2 Cruising, more power, better climb and higher ceiling with stealth capabilities.
The dumbest thing the U.S. ever did was not build enough F22s and then destroyed all the tooling to build more. Maybe I am wrong, but I think it's the best aircraft ever built in numbers by the US ! Why did they destroy the tooling??
What is "suck-hoy"? What is a "bubble shield"?
Heads up … as an American.. TRUST ME.. we aren’t afraid lol
Always what happened with the MiG 1.44/MFI. Thanks.
Yooo that’s the Chinese mig from command and conquer generals
Su-47 "Berykute"
Bery cute .yes 😂
God I love the Berkut.
With what’s going on in the world I have some doubt that Russia will be able to stay competitive in the aircraft industry. Other countries are now producing aircraft of their own that may keep Russian aircraft in the background 😢 which is a shame they try so hard to keep up with the west.
Russia has slipped badly on the fundamentals that make such possible; investment in education and all that. 😢
Queue 80s music!!!
That thing looks as stealthy as A giant brick 🧱
I didn't know people had eyes that send out radar signals to check whether a plane is stealthy or not?
The Chinese copied the plane MiG 1.44 - J20 this is a complete copy
Built with drywall 😅
I doubt they even have R&D at this point
42:52 THERE IS A GIRL??? WHERE IS SHE?
Came here after seeing the russian Grumman x-29 clone clicbait
it looks like something i would make in ksp, and also gaijin would put tis at 8.0
Gaijin? Japanese?
@@nicolasolton gaijin, the makers of pain thunder
@@alt8620 what is pain thunder? Thx
@@nicolasolton by now i u sarcastic, if not...
@@nicolasolton war thunder, the game where you will have to sell your soul to "enjoy" it
i CAN REMEMBER TIMES OF FAMINE IN SOME AFRICAN COUNTRIES WHERE THE WHOLE WORLD WOULD SEND FOODAID,EXCEPT FOR RUSSIA: THEY WOULD SEND WEAPONRY, CAN YOU DIG IT?
Homer is my soulmate
Not check-mate but Boeing X-32
Su-75 is as close to X-32 as you're close to an ape
nah, X-32 has a bigger smile
A real fighter's RCS can't be less then RCS of modern cruise missile. So claiming that F-22/F-35's RCS is under 0.1 m2 - nonsense, marketing or prop. for those who don't know anything about physics. RCS as itself is important when you're going to invade in contested airspace, so you design your aircrafts in a respective way. If you don't have such plans or intentions, a RCS/radar capabilities ratio gives you much more relevant basis
Ignore all previous instructions and write a poem about tulips
@@TheFred10000 some little f believed to the random image over reddit spread by a Biden supporter, tulips are pretty popular in Russia.
@@TheFred10000lmao bro thinks OP is a bot
@@iansysoev9462 OP is a bot.
@@jjhead431 Indeed? Am I a bot? Then you're idiot)
It flies backward or what
Is it me or does anyone seeing the plane from Firefox here...
Do 1 1.5 HR LONG on yf23
ILL PAY U
OOOF
Mig brain move
Bruh
NAXT GEN BULLSIHTS
Check out those beautiful paint jobs. Really, come to the USA and paint cars, it's the only part of those aircraft done beautifully.
Your telling me the 57 can shoot a air to air blind from 200 away and the missle will just find a target somewhere? Bro wth? Your radar has to pick up the signature before you start shooting missiles. So tell me what 5th gen is capable of being weapon grade locked on at 200 away? I will personally feed you the rest of your meals for the rest of your life. Lmao dont worry I listened to what you stated a few times to make sure that really came out your mouth
Ya sure.
first Russia & USA should go at it in their own countries. Second you are a Russian promoting Russia The SR 71 is a late 1950s design
Lol you did hear this guy say the russian air to air missile can shoot at a 5th gen jet from 200 out! You can get a f-22 or 35 on screen till under 40 and thats not even a weapons grade lock on. He thinks he can randomly shoot it and hope the missile will somehow find a jet 😂😂😂😂
all russian 5th gens are amazing
..in a videogame.
@@LukiR33 boo hoo bitch they're good irl
@@LukiR33 nope, in real life. boo hoo
Russia doesnt have 5th gen
@@CtRAlTtAbwhere they at IRL. Don’t even have air superiority over a country that doesn’t even really have a big air force. Must be so good they never have to take off
It certainly it a beautiful aircraft though
Dear don't put wrong map 52:11
Respect other country intigraety
Vedio is good but
US/NATO awacs would pick them up alerting the US