Feminist Criminology and What It Missed
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ก.ค. 2024
- In this episode, I discuss the most popular theories of Feminist Criminology, as well as giving my opinion on what it is lacking - mental health awareness.
My Links:
Website: www.crisisofcrime.com
TikTok: / crisisofcrime.... .
Twitter: / crisisofcrime
Facebook: / crisisofcrim...
Patreon: / crisisofcrime...
CashApp: @RachelMeans89
Venmo: @Rachel_Means
Sources for this episode:
Cullen, F., Agnew, R., Wilcox, P. (2014). Criminological Theory: Past to Present (5th Edition). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Cain, L., Gross, D. (2010). Healing Neen [documentary film]. USA: In the Hallow Films.
I know this is an old video but it helped me get an A on my semester work at school. Thank you💚.
It’s an old video but how you simplify things - and how you always give an example or an analogy is incredible. My mind often illustrates everything to understand things better and you nail it 🔥👏🏼 However, reading some comments here, you’re always gonna have that one MF who likes to think they know it all 🤦♀️
Anyways great video ☘️ 🇮🇪🙌🏼
This was super helpful
Silence contributes to the problem
This was extremely insightful and helpful for my course! The way you explained everything is very clear and I can easily attach examples to.
Informative! Good job!
This was really useful for my coursework thank you!!!!
Great! Ma'am
Brilliant! The trauma connection is huge.
То, что мужчины и женщины по-разному выражают эмоции, не обязательно означает, что это биология. Японцы и американцы тоже по-разному выражают эмоции и их уровень преступности отличается. Это доказательство биологической причины? Нет.
Результат стастики об эмоциях не показывает причины.
would you be interesting in a podcast interview?
The problem with feminist criminology is the same as the problem with feminist anything-else, which is that it is built on a lie. There is no serious academic discipline behind feminism, no mechanism for sorting the valid from the invalid. Combine that with an outlook loaded with toxic baggage that is often self-contradictory and a desire to reach a pre-determined conclusion, and you can clearly see why starting any approach to a serious subject with "from a feminist perspective" is going to end in disaster. Phrenology and Freudian thought might be more obviously flawed on the face of things, but at least they're relatively easy to debunk now since they're closer to legitimate, disciplined academic fields that can call them out on their nonsense. All "a feminist perspective" does is replace "it's because of the distance between your eyes that you are a criminal" with "it's because of your toxic masculinity that you're a criminal". It's exactly as stupid, it's exactly as degrading to the person's humanity, it's just a whole lot harder to make the feminist admit that.
I also feel like there are numerous errors in your video that rather demonstrate this danger. For example, women did not take men's last names because they were the husband's property, they did it because they were joining together as one family. Why take the man's last name? Well, just to give one reason, because the maternity of a child is rarely in question but the paternity could be, and the family using the man's name acted as a safeguard against any ills that might arise as a consequence of that, it was a definitive statement of parental status. For another example, you're talking about rape and sexual assault and the criminal justice system in the same breath while claiming that women suffer sexual assault at a "much higher rate" than men. That's disputed; We don't know the exact figures but men are raped somewhere from almost as much as women are, to more than women are, once you take into account prison rape, which shows you just how seriously rape against men is treated, it goes on, on an industrial scale, in government run facilities. A woman's claim that she was raped may be doubted, but if she's believed then there'll be a sizable crowd baying for the perpetrator's blood (this was a common cause of lynchings, for example, the zeal is such that people are sometimes willing to set aside due process) but a man who is raped by a woman is treated as a punchline whether he's believed or not. Feminists who are confronted with this are often quick to say how wrong they think that is and how it ought to be taken more seriously, but if they truly meant that then I wouldn't need to be confronting them about it in the first place, because they wouldn't keep on minimising the issue of male rape so that they can stress how women have it worst. They wouldn't be campaigning for the abolition of women's prisons which they do constantly) over the reform of male prisons (where they're silent as the grave).
Tell me you're an incel without telling me you're an incel...
So as a male (forgive me if I have misgendered you based on your lengthy masculine driven response) you think that it's incorrect for society to research aspects of criminal behavior simply because this theory revolves around the notion that women aren't treated the same as men? Feminism is far more inclusive than what you think it is. Disregarding the treatment of populations throughout history is most dangerous to society. Women did in fact take the man's name because they were transferred, like the property they were, from one male to another and this is how it was signified. I hope that between the time you have replied to this video and now, you have educated yourself on matters you clearly need brushing up on before speaking on. No one is making men to stay silent about their abuses. Feminism fights for voices to be heard because for so long women have had to fight to even have a voice or a seat at the table of important discussions. Maybe now, women have a smidgen bit more courage to speak up for themselves AND for one another when they recognize a major problems in society and want to offer a variety of thoughts to consider.
I’ve seen a lot more feminists stick up for male survivors than actual men. Don’t make it out like women are the problem with male mental health when it is in fact toxic masculinity and not letting men share emotions. I understand your criticisms yet you’re not taking into consideration any other factors and are just attacking feminism. She even discusses how men can be affected by sexual offences also. Yet she didn’t go into detail within this video due to the fact that its a video which discusses female criminality and victimology.
the hypocrisy and you contradicting yourself repeatedly is just hilarious lmao. Female offenders weren't taken seriously by many theorists. Their behaviors weren't explained nor they cared to with the excuse of female offenders consisting a small number. Or they either used hormones as an explanation or just labeled them as crazy. Also female offenders were seen as disgusting "unladylike" and mentally ill. So yeah, i don't know what disregarding history does for yall but it's there. And it's a fact. Women weren't treated equally throughout history . No wonder we have conventions and declarations on women's rights . Because history. Sexism is a thing
incorrect. literally everything about this is incorrect. And, there are several serious academic diciplines behind feminism...both psychology, sociology, gender studies, and social work. That's just 4 off the top of my head. I'm sure there are specific history courses as well.
But please, regale us with your academic credentials that make you an authority on academia. Where did you get your postdoc? I would love to inform them of how horribly you're representing their institution...of course...if you haven't received a postdoc and therefore have absolutely no standing on whether or not an academic discipline is or isn't behind literally any subject?...because...thats not how academia works...which someone with any experience or knowledge of academia would know... since you know...there are literally dissertations on feminism that have resulted in granting Ph.D.'s...and if there was "no serious academic discipline behind feminism"...then they wouldn't grant people Ph.D.'s for writing 200+ pages about it...