@@Pgr-pt5ep Same. It felt almost surreal. As if there exists a well-understood rule case for a man in a panda suit sailing across the court they had to respect. The guy must have also felt incredibly awkward after receiving absolutely no reaction for his stun.
Another good one was at the US Open in a match between Roddick and Ferrer. Due to rain a water bubble formed underneath the paint of the court. When they dropped the ball on that bubble, it didn't bounce! It looked like the laws of physics stopped! They eventually moved to a different court to play the match.
Djoko is a lot of anger mismanagement... these antics come from there i guess! Superb tennis player, one of top 5 tennis players of all time, but also the shortest-fuse among those five!!
Very odd though. Because a player is not allowed on the opposing half of the court. Tiafoe would have been flying into the other half of the court if it wasnt for the doubles extension of the net.
Similar to the Tiafoe/Raonic point, the net post "ought not to be there" as it's the doubles net post. Garin loses the point since the ball shouldn't have been able to bounce off it
That net is really a trick problem. The same reason Tiafoe won the point against Raonic is the reason the net cord wasn't counted in Cuevas vs Garin - when playing singles, the portion of the net beyond the singles posts isn't counted for singles (though it would be for doubles). With a bit more awareness of this players might begin to see this and accept it, or even find opportunities to exploit it.
late reply: He's allowed to jump the net to hit the ball, but he touched the ground on the ops side before the ball bounced twice. so he loses the point. If he had hit it back into the net before he landed he would have won.
So the last point in this video is called correctly. That post should not exist in a singles match. Take it away like it's meant to be and it's just out.
4:55 If the linesman calls out, and Hawkeye can't definitely show that the umpire was wrong, the call should stand. If there is an "instant replay" that shows the ball was in but the pretty Hawkeye visual isn't available, they might show that instead, or at least state that VAR (or equivalent) overturned the linesman's call. "Can confirm" just sounds dodgy. Edit to add: If play stops because it was called Out (which it did), and that call is overturned (Hawkeye or not), you need to replay the point. Bro is right to be upset.
Yes, but not at the very top level. You never see pushers that only try to put neutral balls in play breaking in the TOP 10, hitting a ball in the middle of the court results in a winning shot for the opponent at the top of the ranking. The exception that proves the rule is Gilles Simon (yet i wouldn't call him a true 'pusher', he was great at finding short angles and always made it very complicated tactically for his opponents, not to mention he even said himself that he needed to be way more aggressive when he was playing Federer or Nadal).
@@michaelmilano2684pretty sure it was something to do with his shoes being too sticky, but Novak definitely over exaggerates the problem. Whenever he struggles for balance on a shot and then misses it, he often does that for some reason. It’s probably him trying to lose the blame for his missed shot. He did the same thing against Andy in the 2015 AO final for a bit, and it threw Andy off. So could also be some sort of weird tactic as well. Not seen him do it like in this video for some years now though, so guess we’ll never truly know.
@@sloppygamer1291 He was literally doing it in his match against Cerundolo at RG two days ago. Yes he had a real knee injury but every time he was missing a shot or his opponent just hit an obvious winner he would stumble dramatically and act like the ground was ice or something. He loves his theatrics.
If there are inside posts, then the outside post doesn't count (Tiafoe v. Raonic, Garin v. Cuevas), but if there are no inside posts (Murray v. Basilashvili) then the entire net counts.
There are doubles posts and singles post. Then there are also singles sticks. Official matches either use singles posts like in the Murray match or doubles posts with singles sticks like in the Tiafoe match. In a singles match with doubles posts and no singles sticks the whole net and posts count.
It counts as he touched the net before the ball bounced twice in the opponent's court. Hence lost the point. If he hit the ball to the net before he landed in the opponent's court, he would've won the point.
@@pkoppula there is no rule that says you aren't allowed to touch the opponents side of the court. And he didn't touch ne net either. So it should have been his point
@@elmistikawee Raonic once ran around the netpost to the other side of the court aswell, when a ball had so much backspin that it jumped back over the net. He hit the ball from the opponents side and won the point. It is allowed as long as you don't take it out of the air
That was a pathetic example of security at about the 3:15 point. Someone in a panda suit slowly jogs around the entire court, and not a single person was there to protect the players or get the person off of the court.
I thought it was a very old clip, when security wasn't as tight as it is these days, (pre-Monica-Seles-incident), also because the video quality is quite low. But it actually was a qualifying match for the Rotterdam ATP tournament. Guess they don't have military style security at quallies.
@@MartinJohnZ dude, they have no security. in fairness it's very rare that someone actually attacks a player like the Monica Seles thing but they should def do more to protect the players
Someone else answered it on another comment: ITF rule 24g, a player or their racket cannot touch the opponent’s court at any time while the ball is in play - Troicki lost the point as the ball hadn't bounced twice when he landed.
True. Troicki would have been allowed to reach over the net to hit the ball but he’s not allowed to touch the opponents side of the court. Still great reaction from him to do what he did
@@gabsol7397 we can actually thats why im commenting this video, u can slow at 25% and will start stopping at every frame from 4.12, u can see clearly that the bounce was out cuz u dont see the ball going up and crossing the line, u can see exaclty the frame where the ball bounces 4.13 and it changes his movement angle from OUT the line thats clearly an out-bounce. u have the frame
@@T.A.O-f9v no we don't have the frame. in the frame prior to the bounce, the ball is still descending from above the line, and in the frame after, the ball is ascending also above the line, but the bounce is in-between them and nothing indicates that the ball couldn't have bounced in, especially when it only needs to touch it not to cross it
So the last one... Was it out because it hit outside of the singles area (like in the call earlier in the video) or what happened there (don't know tennis well enough to know)?
The net post counts as part of the net, so when the ball hit the net post and then bounced in, Garin's return is technically in. But I think it counts as a let because the ball boy/girl caught it after the first bounce (even if Cuevas wouldn't get to it even if beating the world record in long jump).
@@knotwilg3596 Thanks for the reply; ah didn't think about that (ballgirl catching it). Easiest would be to just replay the point I assume (?) but obviously the guy who returned it wouldn't be happy about that either.
@@SicketMog The point doesn't count for Garin as he hit the double's post and not the single's post. The double's post is not considered as a part of the game in a single's match.
@@quentinhirschfeld9382 Aha yeah that makes sense (again I don't play nor usually watch tennis so these are things I don't think about). Thank you both for the replies and for the explanation.👍
No, it was an illegal play, his feet touched the opponent's side of the court inside the single's playable zone before the ball bounced twice, which is considered as 'invasion by the rules.
I’ve played tennis for over 30 years and I’ve seen and experienced at least 80% of these so nothing special but it’s always interesting when something weird happens.
@@mysticvetenks Did you pay attention to what happened between Raonic v. Tiafoe? The answer is there. When there are inside single posts the net between the outside post to the inside post don't count as the net.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 82 วันนี้!! คู่เอก | ยอดไอคิว vs อับดัลลาห์](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hSsyTl_9bqs/mqdefault.jpg)
Rare moment of Djoko playing just like Jim Carey would.
It only happened on the forehand side
It happened only when he failed a easy shot. Drama queen.
The panda: 💃💃💃
The players: 😐
😂
Fact that everyone was so quiet like it was normal and they just continued playing had me cracking up.
@@Pgr-pt5ep Same. It felt almost surreal. As if there exists a well-understood rule case for a man in a panda suit sailing across the court they had to respect. The guy must have also felt incredibly awkward after receiving absolutely no reaction for his stun.
This is a highly entertaining compliation video. Seen most of the clips before but all bangers one after another
I lost it at the panda suit guy. Too funny 😄😄
Always listen first, Mr. Raonic 😂…ball bouncing twice? Amazing how the Umpire knew how to rule in that situation instantly.
6:45 "LET..."
"...there be light!" was a big missed opportunity
Have seen this a lot but not able to understand what was going on with Djoker 😂
Looks like they stretched him out too much
I’m sayin it was his shoes
He does it as a performance when he mishits the ball.
too much creatina
Exactly. Tennis version of flops.
It must take everything in the umps to not say “will you just shut up for 2 seconds and listen to me?!”
Referees, umpires, and judges in almost every sport agree with you!
9:04 ,That's definitely the greatest ace in the tennis history...
Really wish there had been some more reaction shots and close ups of each of their faces for that one.
I actually did the same type of ace in a match once 😂
@@jandroid33 ,Yeah and I saw polar bear in a desert once,bitch please 😂
@@jandroid33 I received one of those. Some laughed, some cried. I didn't laugh.
@@MartinJohnZ so u cried?
Of course Garin wants that point lolll
I can't believe that he thought that he deserved that point
total travesty
He needs a rules refresher like Raonic did against Tiafoe - it's the "singles" net with the inside post that counts, not the outside post.
th-cam.com/video/S-C0KZEG5Z0/w-d-xo.htmlsi=dgfR7bmE_fPScAMw
Look at the point in the link above. They clearly play on.
7:07 love the only thing we can see is the time 😂😂
Rolex, Swiss engineering
philosophical
8:44 - This is why we love Monfils.
Djokovic killed me😂
1:50 is this man being controlled by spiders? wth is going on lmao
Funniest part, this is Novak Djokovic, arguably the greatest ever in his sport.
2:31 Neo dodging bullets in the Matrix
Djokovic was working on his own laws of physics right there 🌌🛸
7:19 is like a left hand batter receiving a wicked bouncer from a pace bowler :) (cricket fans will understand)
Dude looking at his racket expecting that the strings were gone 😅1:04
Djokovics histrionics were ridiculous 🤣
I enjoy the fact the grammar is so far off that Google Translate autokicked in for this message.
panda had me dead bro wtf 💀
Del Potro pulled some voodoo stuff on Djokovic
3:27 the roll got me ;-;
Another good one was at the US Open in a match between Roddick and Ferrer. Due to rain a water bubble formed underneath the paint of the court. When they dropped the ball on that bubble, it didn't bounce! It looked like the laws of physics stopped! They eventually moved to a different court to play the match.
This is a terrific compilation 😂 well done!!
I was watching the Koepfer-Monfils' match live when the blackout happened 4 years ago.
One of the biggest 'WTF' moment i've ever witnessed.
Damn Tiafoe really wanted to lose the point lol
Seems like Djokovic was overdoped that day...
What was going on?😂
this comment section-💀💀
Pulling Djokovic's strings like a puppet
Djoko is a lot of anger mismanagement... these antics come from there i guess!
Superb tennis player, one of top 5 tennis players of all time, but also the shortest-fuse among those five!!
So generous...
6:15 Oh yeah I totally forgot that by rule the net “ends” at the singles line to keep the rule consistent between longer and shorter nets.
Not the singles line, the singles stick, which is the equivalent to what would be the singles post in a court with no doubles posts.
Very odd though. Because a player is not allowed on the opposing half of the court. Tiafoe would have been flying into the other half of the court if it wasnt for the doubles extension of the net.
I think he wouldn't. As the singles court doesn't contain the outer part of the court. @@bearingef
So what does the rule book provide regarding the final point shown?
Similar to the Tiafoe/Raonic point, the net post "ought not to be there" as it's the doubles net post. Garin loses the point since the ball shouldn't have been able to bounce off it
Djokovic having a stroke?
Drunkovic
That net is really a trick problem. The same reason Tiafoe won the point against Raonic is the reason the net cord wasn't counted in Cuevas vs Garin - when playing singles, the portion of the net beyond the singles posts isn't counted for singles (though it would be for doubles). With a bit more awareness of this players might begin to see this and accept it, or even find opportunities to exploit it.
The last clip is crazy.
That is daylight robbery!
Nah, for the same reason that one point went to Tiafoe, the post is not in play.
@@SeakCys ok, thanks, I was not aware of that. At least in table tennis the posts count the same as the net. I imagined it was the same in tennis.
@@SeakCyswell they counted the serve when it was a let on a serve in the video 7:32 when Murray was returning, same thing
@@SeakCysgoogled it as well, it does count if it hits the post
The post is even beyond the doubles line so that is most definitely out
Every thing else I can understand and is funny, except Djokavic Vs Del Potro. Was Djokavic on drug?
2.25 Djokovic is like the cockroach alien in human guise from Men in Black
Even I knew the rule about touching the exterior part of the net, how does a pro player like Raonic not know that? 😂
2:49 they didn't give him the point? are they saying he touched the net?
late reply: He's allowed to jump the net to hit the ball, but he touched the ground on the ops side before the ball bounced twice. so he loses the point. If he had hit it back into the net before he landed he would have won.
Great compilation
2:00 Djokovic looks like he has early onset Parkinson's disease
So the last point in this video is called correctly. That post should not exist in a singles match. Take it away like it's meant to be and it's just out.
4:55 If the linesman calls out, and Hawkeye can't definitely show that the umpire was wrong, the call should stand. If there is an "instant replay" that shows the ball was in but the pretty Hawkeye visual isn't available, they might show that instead, or at least state that VAR (or equivalent) overturned the linesman's call. "Can confirm" just sounds dodgy.
Edit to add: If play stops because it was called Out (which it did), and that call is overturned (Hawkeye or not), you need to replay the point. Bro is right to be upset.
2:00 Having played tennis for many years, often the winning strategy is to just let your opponent make mistakes.
Yes, but not at the very top level.
You never see pushers that only try to put neutral balls in play breaking in the TOP 10, hitting a ball in the middle of the court results in a winning shot for the opponent at the top of the ranking.
The exception that proves the rule is Gilles Simon (yet i wouldn't call him a true 'pusher', he was great at finding short angles and always made it very complicated tactically for his opponents, not to mention he even said himself that he needed to be way more aggressive when he was playing Federer or Nadal).
2:24
wtf
he is Neo !
I think what happend to Djokovic was that his racket was too heavy
Troicki definitely had his Weetabix that morning
Good compilation. 👍
Djokovic forgetting how his body works
The drugs really did a number on Djokovic haha
Have we ever really established what his deal was in that match?
@@michaelmilano2684 his shoes
@@michaelmilano2684pretty sure it was something to do with his shoes being too sticky, but Novak definitely over exaggerates the problem. Whenever he struggles for balance on a shot and then misses it, he often does that for some reason. It’s probably him trying to lose the blame for his missed shot. He did the same thing against Andy in the 2015 AO final for a bit, and it threw Andy off. So could also be some sort of weird tactic as well. Not seen him do it like in this video for some years now though, so guess we’ll never truly know.
@@sloppygamer1291 thanks for the explanation
@@sloppygamer1291 He was literally doing it in his match against Cerundolo at RG two days ago. Yes he had a real knee injury but every time he was missing a shot or his opponent just hit an obvious winner he would stumble dramatically and act like the ground was ice or something. He loves his theatrics.
Looks like the refs can't decide if the doubles net counts during singles or not. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't.
If there are inside posts, then the outside post doesn't count (Tiafoe v. Raonic, Garin v. Cuevas), but if there are no inside posts (Murray v. Basilashvili) then the entire net counts.
There are doubles posts and singles post. Then there are also singles sticks. Official matches either use singles posts like in the Murray match or doubles posts with singles sticks like in the Tiafoe match. In a singles match with doubles posts and no singles sticks the whole net and posts count.
th-cam.com/video/S-C0KZEG5Z0/w-d-xo.htmlsi=uPWAokKE98e7Q9CR
Somebody used some voodoo sh*t on Novak in the Shanghai match (haha)
should add the tennis serve Andy Roddick did on clay ball was stuck into the clay court
Sadly that's an advert
5:45 Great call by the umpire. It's stupid that they can use Doubles net in Singles comp, but the rule is clear. Not a glitch, just great umpiring!
7:40 for about five years?! I'd rather say for a lifetime
I will never condone verbal noises when ball striking. Ego's on the rampage!
Djokovic missing his shots was the drugs wearing off 😂
What was the first guy doing with his moaning? Did he think he was Sharapova?
I'm confused, what did Troicki do wrong? 2:45
It should have been his point
It counts as he touched the net before the ball bounced twice in the opponent's court. Hence lost the point. If he hit the ball to the net before he landed in the opponent's court, he would've won the point.
@@pkoppula there is no rule that says you aren't allowed to touch the opponents side of the court. And he didn't touch ne net either. So it should have been his point
Are you serious ? The guy jump to the opponent's side before the ball bounce twice
@@elmistikawee Raonic once ran around the netpost to the other side of the court aswell, when a ball had so much backspin that it jumped back over the net. He hit the ball from the opponents side and won the point. It is allowed as long as you don't take it out of the air
That was a pathetic example of security at about the 3:15 point. Someone in a panda suit slowly jogs around the entire court, and not a single person was there to protect the players or get the person off of the court.
I thought it was a very old clip, when security wasn't as tight as it is these days, (pre-Monica-Seles-incident), also because the video quality is quite low. But it actually was a qualifying match for the Rotterdam ATP tournament. Guess they don't have military style security at quallies.
@@MartinJohnZ dude, they have no security. in fairness it's very rare that someone actually attacks a player like the Monica Seles thing but they should def do more to protect the players
@@MartinJohnZ You would think they would have some idea something could happen with the number of crazies running around these days.
I just took it as a match that was low enough that no one cared. Basically one step above a local tournament.
it's a recent clip. You can tell by the on-screen scoreboard.
Awsome vid. Does anyone know if Garin actually got the point awarded? Clearly, he should have!
I think cause of Djokovic shoes seen this too on clay where he hurt his ankle cause him to retire the game same shoes
I had no idea you could legally hit it around the net
On trodicki and goffin play- who won that point ? What's the rule regarding that point.
Someone else answered it on another comment: ITF rule 24g, a player or their racket cannot touch the opponent’s court at any time while the ball is in play - Troicki lost the point as the ball hadn't bounced twice when he landed.
True. Troicki would have been allowed to reach over the net to hit the ball but he’s not allowed to touch the opponents side of the court.
Still great reaction from him to do what he did
Nobody talking about how OUT that ball was 4:12 ?
lmao i was looking for this comment, i slowed at 25% in hd and is clearly bouncing out , wonder if nadal won that match aniway probably yes
@@T.A.O-f9v we don't see the frame in which the ball lands. you can't tell based on this video
@@gabsol7397 we can actually thats why im commenting this video, u can slow at 25% and will start stopping at every frame from 4.12, u can see clearly that the bounce was out cuz u dont see the ball going up and crossing the line, u can see exaclty the frame where the ball bounces 4.13 and it changes his movement angle from OUT the line thats clearly an out-bounce. u have the frame
@@T.A.O-f9v no we don't have the frame. in the frame prior to the bounce, the ball is still descending from above the line, and in the frame after, the ball is ascending also above the line, but the bounce is in-between them and nothing indicates that the ball couldn't have bounced in, especially when it only needs to touch it not to cross it
@@T.A.O-f9v 1. there quite clearly isn't the frame
2. it looks in from the available frames
3. hawkeye said it's in
And by glitch in the matrix, you really mean ‘missed shots.’
Seems like you haven't watched the video.
Nowadays the security guys would have killed the Rotterdam panda in no time flat, endangered species or not.
This literally happened last year, that match was between Greg Barrère and Quentin Halys, both active player in their 20s.
4:12 if u slow at 20% speed u can see the ball was out
For me, the ball is in.
The bounce (which is the moment the ball's energy is absorbed by the ground) is out, but the ball licks the line before.
tennis still requires a ref in the middle? could be 2 cameras
Random panda action. Nice.......
Brain Strokovic
sinner tsitsipas monte carlo 24 missing
4:13 I never understood the ruling here. Do they just replay the point?
Late, but yes they replay the point.
So the last one... Was it out because it hit outside of the singles area (like in the call earlier in the video) or what happened there (don't know tennis well enough to know)?
The net post counts as part of the net, so when the ball hit the net post and then bounced in, Garin's return is technically in. But I think it counts as a let because the ball boy/girl caught it after the first bounce (even if Cuevas wouldn't get to it even if beating the world record in long jump).
@@knotwilg3596 Thanks for the reply; ah didn't think about that (ballgirl catching it). Easiest would be to just replay the point I assume (?) but obviously the guy who returned it wouldn't be happy about that either.
@@knotwilg3596
Wrong explanation.
@@SicketMog
The point doesn't count for Garin as he hit the double's post and not the single's post.
The double's post is not considered as a part of the game in a single's match.
@@quentinhirschfeld9382 Aha yeah that makes sense (again I don't play nor usually watch tennis so these are things I don't think about). Thank you both for the replies and for the explanation.👍
This is gold 😁
Was it windy or what´s up with Djokovic there.
He said shoes are sticky but there are rumours he was drinking alot the night before. Whatever it is it seems weird
what the fuck was djokovic doing there with his feet :D
it seemed like he drank one drink too much the day before,
or is it really that court?
If Nadal returned the "phantom" ball from Coric, wouldn't the call go to Nadal since Coric didn't continue the rally?
No, they both stopped playing because of the call so it’s a let.
Does anyone know what was going on with Djokovic??? So strange
this is the result when you mess with kundalini yoga (demonic possession), I have no other explanation
7:26 😆😆😆
Was Djokovic drunk or what?
Nothing to do with Glitches, but entertaining nonetheless.
No sh*t Sherlock.
2:20 bet you a hundred dollars he was on drugs that day. Maybe they gave him a little too heavy a dose of anti anxiety meds
So did the 3:03 dude get his point?
No, it was an illegal play, his feet touched the opponent's side of the court inside the single's playable zone before the ball bounced twice, which is considered as 'invasion by the rules.
wtff is happening with Djoko?!! Looks like a nervous system breakdown, cringe af
I’ve played tennis for over 30 years and I’ve seen and experienced at least 80% of these so nothing special but it’s always interesting when something weird happens.
The Monfils-Koepfer blackout is the most unique stuff i've seen in a big sporting event.
Tf djokovic🤣
La ultima como fue ? Buenisima no?
No
That was some voodoo stuff for Djokovic🪄
wow
Djokovic should get some acting classes. He is not very good at it. it's so irritating to watch him.
Garin was right! What a dumb umpire.
nope
I agree that should have counted no?
@@mysticvetenks Did you pay attention to what happened between Raonic v. Tiafoe? The answer is there. When there are inside single posts the net between the outside post to the inside post don't count as the net.
I think they are ok to touch by the players but also by the balls. I'm pretty sure the point should count.
@@3DxPOD They simply count as outside terrain. So the ruling is consistent. Player can touch it, ball can't.
4:47 teacher at The Peanuts
Great compilation