Want some help building your best body ever? Here are three ways I can assist whenever you’re ready: 1. Want to be your own coach? Read one of my bestselling books for men and women: Men ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSBLS Women ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSTLS And want to get one of my audiobooks for free? Click here to learn how ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSA 2. Want personalized help? Check out my custom meal plan and VIP one-on-one coaching services: Custom meal plan ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSCMP One-on-one coaching ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSVIP 3. Want an easy boost? Add a couple of my science-based supplements to your regimen: Protein powder ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSL1 Pre-workout ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSL2 Fat burner ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSL3 And if none of that tickles your neurons, you might like all the simple, practical, and evidence-based teachings over at my blog, podcast, and Instagram. My blog ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSBlog My podcast ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSPod My Instagram ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSIG
Great episode. The comments arguing that Dan John's evidence is anecdotal miss that he trains athletes. If you are a beginner, listen to Matthews or Rip. If you want to be a powerlifter, read, Marty Gallagher. If you are an athlete though, Dan John is the man. I was always overtrained trying to keep up with powerlifting programs simultaneous to hard sport training. Easy Strength has changed everything for me.
This sums it up perfectly. Something I have been completely guilty of, mixing the goals they don’t mix well and wondering why I’m not seeing any results I’m going to use this explanation later Thanks
I remember this German weightlifter who had never clean and jerked more than 246 kg before the 2008 Olympics. He had to lift 258 kg to win the gold medal. Nobody believed he could do it. But he nailed the lift and won the gold medal. He was never close to 258 kg again. That was a max max.
I don't agree with most of what Dan John says- using such light percentages, anecdotes, outliers... But on a different note, how great of an interviewer is Mike! Even when he doesn't agree with Dan John he asks the right questions and helps him explain his point(since he's vague most of the time). Looking forward to more content!
I don’t understand why he doesn’t break it down with a beginner/intermediate/advanced. Within those loose parameters he can give some more specific examples for a programming.
In the book he and Pavel lay out basically an HLM wave loading between 80-90 % with the 5 main lifts for athletes. He's not talking about normal people who just lift, nor bodybuilders. He's talking about pro athletes and young athletes in college. Training for your sport requires a lot of recovery resources. Easy strength is the answer for the natural athlete, i.e. who does not use peds. Read the chapter on The Clue.
I think it was a fair criticism about the lack of clarity. Followed Dan for years, read all his books, and still never had a very clear idea of how to put Easy Strength into practice. It’s almost like he’s being intentionally vague.
@@ahrengroesch8774 Well, the way I think of it is that different coaches are useful for different things. Guys like Pavel and Dan John are great for broad perspective and insights based on experience, weak on programming that goes beyond the "40 days - 6 weeks" mark. If you want clear, specific, long-term planning, coaches like Rippetoe and Wendler are better.
I’d love to know how it’s hard… it’s pretty… we’ll easy. If you read the book it says for 5 days a week do 10 reps in however many sets you want (he outlines ways to do this in the show) for the below movements: 1. Push 2. Pull 3. Hinge 4. Ab Wheel 5. Farmers walks You can adapt the above rules based on how you feel for the day. Add walking if you want to lose weight.
Its hard for people becouse it force to think by yourself about weights and in my opinion this is the best approach. How one coach would know what percentage are best for you if he doesnt know you and dont know anything about you? Ppl want ultimate blueprints, „do 40% then 65 then 85 and you will be magically strong”. How could that even work? 😂
Dan John is a very nice person,ask him a Simple question and he will ramble on forever and NOT answer the question. Only thing i ever learned from him was the DeLorme method. If your poundage on a squat goes up..you made gains.
Mike Matthews sounds like a bored and overly hormonal brat. Meanwhile the great Dan John sounds like your drunk uncle annoying everyone at the table with tales of his glorious prime. But not without straying some pearls of wisdom here and there...
No he's not. He is trying to explain why he doesn't believe in percentages for lifting programs. He highlights this by going up in weights and showing that even though it maybe the same percentage the weights may be too taxing on the body.
![ไปอยู่ไสมา - ช๊อปเปอร์ โตเกียวมิวสิค [ OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/sWuVNbRTJbc/mqdefault.jpg)
Want some help building your best body ever? Here are three ways I can assist whenever you’re ready:
1. Want to be your own coach? Read one of my bestselling books for men and women:
Men ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSBLS
Women ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSTLS
And want to get one of my audiobooks for free?
Click here to learn how ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSA
2. Want personalized help? Check out my custom meal plan and VIP one-on-one coaching services:
Custom meal plan ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSCMP
One-on-one coaching ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSVIP
3. Want an easy boost? Add a couple of my science-based supplements to your regimen:
Protein powder ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSL1
Pre-workout ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSL2
Fat burner ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSL3
And if none of that tickles your neurons, you might like all the simple, practical, and evidence-based teachings over at my blog, podcast, and Instagram.
My blog ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSBlog
My podcast ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSPod
My Instagram ⇒ geni.us/MikeSSIG
Great episode. The comments arguing that Dan John's evidence is anecdotal miss that he trains athletes. If you are a beginner, listen to Matthews or Rip. If you want to be a powerlifter, read, Marty Gallagher. If you are an athlete though, Dan John is the man. I was always overtrained trying to keep up with powerlifting programs simultaneous to hard sport training. Easy Strength has changed everything for me.
This sums it up perfectly. Something I have been completely guilty of, mixing the goals they don’t mix well and wondering why I’m not seeing any results
I’m going to use this explanation later
Thanks
I remember this German weightlifter who had never clean and jerked more than 246 kg before the 2008 Olympics. He had to lift 258 kg to win the gold medal. Nobody believed he could do it. But he nailed the lift and won the gold medal. He was never close to 258 kg again. That was a max max.
Matthias Steiner 🙏
He is being ''vague'',because he is offering ideas and concepts...
Nice interview Mike,Dan John is such a brilliant mind!
8:50
Ding ding ding
So tough to separate sometimes on what works on gear vs not
I love how he talks athletes
Can this be applied to caliathenics? Or is all of this based on heavier, weighted loads?
You can increase reps and increase lever ( decreasing leverage)
I don't agree with most of what Dan John says- using such light percentages, anecdotes, outliers... But on a different note, how great of an interviewer is Mike! Even when he doesn't agree with Dan John he asks the right questions and helps him explain his point(since he's vague most of the time). Looking forward to more content!
I don’t understand why he doesn’t break it down with a beginner/intermediate/advanced. Within those loose parameters he can give some more specific examples for a programming.
In the book he and Pavel lay out basically an HLM wave loading between 80-90 % with the 5 main lifts for athletes. He's not talking about normal people who just lift, nor bodybuilders. He's talking about pro athletes and young athletes in college. Training for your sport requires a lot of recovery resources. Easy strength is the answer for the natural athlete, i.e. who does not use peds. Read the chapter on The Clue.
Are you mikes second account? His questions were terrible lol
Great episode but what's with all the commercials?
I have never seen so many on a TH-cam video iam just about to turn it off just had quick check see if any one else had same issue
I think it was a fair criticism about the lack of clarity. Followed Dan for years, read all his books, and still never had a very clear idea of how to put Easy Strength into practice. It’s almost like he’s being intentionally vague.
Never heard of Dan, but this exact type of vagueness is exactly why I never made any progress until I found Mike.
@@ahrengroesch8774 Well, the way I think of it is that different coaches are useful for different things. Guys like Pavel and Dan John are great for broad perspective and insights based on experience, weak on programming that goes beyond the "40 days - 6 weeks" mark. If you want clear, specific, long-term planning, coaches like Rippetoe and Wendler are better.
I’d love to know how it’s hard… it’s pretty… we’ll easy.
If you read the book it says for 5 days a week do 10 reps in however many sets you want (he outlines ways to do this in the show) for the below movements:
1. Push
2. Pull
3. Hinge
4. Ab Wheel
5. Farmers walks
You can adapt the above rules based on how you feel for the day. Add walking if you want to lose weight.
You can also add in kettlebell swings if you don’t want to do farmers walks
Its hard for people becouse it force to think by yourself about weights and in my opinion this is the best approach. How one coach would know what percentage are best for you if he doesnt know you and dont know anything about you? Ppl want ultimate blueprints, „do 40% then 65 then 85 and you will be magically strong”. How could that even work? 😂
If you watch the old b&w jack lalane videos on here from the 60s everything has been said.... its just been getting repackaged for 60 years
Dan John is a very nice person,ask him a Simple question and he will ramble on forever and NOT answer the question.
Only thing i ever learned from him was the DeLorme method.
If your poundage on a squat goes up..you made gains.
true kinda full of shit in many a way
agreed
As a Dan's fan it made me cringe to listen to the ideas and questions you asked him.
100%
Yep
"I've got you beat there!".....hmmm
Ths dude in the wife-beater shirt needs to learn to listen AND learn to ask questions to his guest ...
Mike Matthews sounds like a bored and overly hormonal brat. Meanwhile the great Dan John sounds like your drunk uncle annoying everyone at the table with tales of his glorious prime. But not without straying some pearls of wisdom here and there...
Porn ruined me. I'm be surprised if I ever recover enough to have something resembling a normal sexual relationship.
Whose normal?
@@signkutter9218 I'm gonna go with men that can have sex and finish.
@@ahrengroesch8774 haha...ok man...but that leaves in a whole hell of alot of leeway...Dudes that hump sexdolls rejoice!
There's hope for you
This guy is using outliers as examples. Who using his program is squatting 600+ for reps and benching 300+ for 10?
Your average lifter isnt going to squat 600 for 10+...
Benching 300 for 10 isnt that unusual
@@signkutter9218
Yes.
Yes it is.
No he's not. He is trying to explain why he doesn't believe in percentages for lifting programs. He highlights this by going up in weights and showing that even though it maybe the same percentage the weights may be too taxing on the body.
This dude contradicts himself while being vague as possible while still speaking