Great matchup. But inability to display Scores at the end of every point & not having a steady Score Board on Screen I think is a major flaw & makes the video very boring to watch & follow. Can the You tuber kindly do the needful & relay back the vid. Thks.
@@mikeg8375Chang had a couple of bad match ups, largely because they could smother his game either from the baseline or at the net. He was 0-5 against Moya, 0-4 against Kafelnikov, 0-4 against Magnus Norman, 0-3 against Mayotte, 1-5 against Enqvist, 1-5 against Becker, 1-4 against Federer and 1-4 against McEnroe. I think there were two worst of his defeats I ever witnessed. The first was when McEnroe beat him 6-0, 6-3, 6-1 at the 1988 French Open. Chang was admittedly very young, but he looked completely helpless. The second was at Wimbledon 1990 when Edberg beat him 6-3, 6-2, 6-1. Edberg just completely smothered Chang that day.
Agassi (after Gilbert starts coaching him) played high percentage tennis. Basically, he would make very few unforced errors and would grind his opponent down by making them run. If you hit a great shot and won the point he would simply look across the net as if to say "great, do that another 25 times in a row and you might be onto something". All the while you're getting cramp and he's still firing away with the same machine like consistency. All the while he's getting a better and better read on your serve so you stop picking up any free points on your own serve. Most players couldn't hold up to that kind of strain and that's why Agassi won so many matches. He would force you to make shots that weren't routine in order to consistently win points all the while making you run like a dog. The punisher.
@@UlyssesVillamin "My father has a special name for this contrarian strategy. He calls it putting a blister on the other guy’s brain. With this strategy, this brutal philosophy, he stamps me for life. He turns me into a boxer with a tennis racket. More, since most tennis players pride themselves on their serve, my father turns me into a counterpuncher-a returner." - Open, Andre Agassi (his autobiography)
@@stearrow_3245 You are confusing a point-builder to a counter puncher. A counter puncher very seldom go for winners and utilizes a heavy topspin like Chang. Agassi doesn’t play like that. Even his return game is aggressive.
I try to think what Michael could have done to give Agassi more of a fight? I think he could have shortened his back swing and played more aggressively. Bc Agassi just controlled the pace of the entire match. Although it did go 5 sets.
I think trying to out slug Agassi was a mistake. Agassi just had more power than Chang,and unless Agassi was off form then there wasn't much chance that Chang would win that way. Chang could have tried to mix the pace and spins up and tried to break up Agassi's rhythm. Lendl for example used to drive Agassi crazy by just slicing his backhand cross court all day. But that wasn't Chang's natural game.
The best thing agassi did was left Bolletieri and his serve motion he had in 1993 wich was horrible! Here with gilbert he started to played better and better
@@mariuszneugebauer8801not the truth, just a misunderstanding. Here is the quote: "On return games, it really was about not letting Andre dictate, doing something on the second serve and putting him on the defensive." Sampras didn't describe Agassi's game as defensive. He played more agressive than ever to nullify Agassi's attacking oriented game.
I remember after this tournament everybody wanted a Head Radical 😎
Me..😅🥂
i play tested the original , nice feeling racquet..
Agassi in 94-95 amazing tennis
Indeed. He was an amazing world star back then.
It was the toughest match of Agassi during the US Open-1994. The only match of the tournament where Andre lost two sets before he eventually won.
Hmmmm...no grunting, no going to a towel after every point, no yanking on shorts, no fixing of hair...just tennis.
But there is using of hair wigs :)
Insane quality
Great matchup. But inability to display Scores at the end of every point & not having a steady Score Board on Screen I think is a major flaw & makes the video very boring to watch & follow.
Can the You tuber kindly do the needful & relay back the vid. Thks.
13:35 insane swing volley by Agassi 😮
Amazing match.Congrats Andre 👏😍
A much tougher ask for Agassi against Chang than Stich was for him in the final.
So good!!
The problem Chang had throughout his career - there were several players who, when they were on form, could overpower him.
And an in-form, fit Agassi was one of them because he could out grind him also. Bad matchup for Chang.
@@mikeg8375 agreed.. still.. took 5 sets. :)
@@mikeg8375Chang had a couple of bad match ups, largely because they could smother his game either from the baseline or at the net. He was 0-5 against Moya, 0-4 against Kafelnikov, 0-4 against Magnus Norman, 0-3 against Mayotte, 1-5 against Enqvist, 1-5 against Becker, 1-4 against Federer and 1-4 against McEnroe. I think there were two worst of his defeats I ever witnessed. The first was when McEnroe beat him 6-0, 6-3, 6-1 at the 1988 French Open. Chang was admittedly very young, but he looked completely helpless. The second was at Wimbledon 1990 when Edberg beat him 6-3, 6-2, 6-1. Edberg just completely smothered Chang that day.
今でも当時のラジカルツア―を使用してます。最近の軽いラケットがどうも しっくりこない笑
Point @23:05 is crazy
Had a grainy worn-out tape of this match back in the day.
these highlights make it seem like chang was dominating agassi.
Agassi (after Gilbert starts coaching him) played high percentage tennis. Basically, he would make very few unforced errors and would grind his opponent down by making them run. If you hit a great shot and won the point he would simply look across the net as if to say "great, do that another 25 times in a row and you might be onto something". All the while you're getting cramp and he's still firing away with the same machine like consistency. All the while he's getting a better and better read on your serve so you stop picking up any free points on your own serve. Most players couldn't hold up to that kind of strain and that's why Agassi won so many matches. He would force you to make shots that weren't routine in order to consistently win points all the while making you run like a dog. The punisher.
Not at all, what match did you watch?
@@stearrow_3245LOL Agassi is an attacker not a counterpuncher.
@@UlyssesVillamin "My father has a special name for this contrarian strategy. He calls it putting a blister on the other guy’s brain. With this strategy, this brutal philosophy, he stamps me for life. He turns me into a boxer with a tennis racket. More, since most tennis players pride themselves on their serve, my father turns me into a counterpuncher-a returner." - Open, Andre Agassi (his autobiography)
@@stearrow_3245 You are confusing a point-builder to a counter puncher. A counter puncher very seldom go for winners and utilizes a heavy topspin like Chang. Agassi doesn’t play like that. Even his return game is aggressive.
91, 92, 93, 94, 96, 97, Chang lost to the eventual champion here.
I try to think what Michael could have done to give Agassi more of a fight? I think he could have shortened his back swing and played more aggressively. Bc Agassi just controlled the pace of the entire match. Although it did go 5 sets.
I think trying to out slug Agassi was a mistake. Agassi just had more power than Chang,and unless Agassi was off form then there wasn't much chance that Chang would win that way. Chang could have tried to mix the pace and spins up and tried to break up Agassi's rhythm. Lendl for example used to drive Agassi crazy by just slicing his backhand cross court all day. But that wasn't Chang's natural game.
Serena Williams vs Shaughnessy Sydney 2002,please send it here
Never really felt Chang could beat Andre when Andre was "right".....Too much firepower.....Andre knew it
Andre winner
The best thing agassi did was left Bolletieri and his serve motion he had in 1993 wich was horrible! Here with gilbert he started to played better and better
better thinker with gilbert
He suffered a wrist injury in 1993 hence the weird serve motion.
1994 Djokovic here
Agassi's game is not defensive at all, weird comparison.
@@SonateSonateWhat? Of course it is. Pete described Andre that way when they've played Wimbledon final in 99 for example.
@@mariuszneugebauer8801 good joke
@@SonateSonate Not at all. Only the truth.
@@mariuszneugebauer8801not the truth, just a misunderstanding. Here is the quote: "On return games, it really was about not letting Andre dictate, doing something on the second serve and putting him on the defensive." Sampras didn't describe Agassi's game as defensive. He played more agressive than ever to nullify Agassi's attacking oriented game.