3 Categories of CAD software programs

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024
  • #solidworks2023 #tips #drawing
    Watch my webinar ▶ bit.ly/SCPNewS...
    Also here are my mini-series if you want to learn SolidWorks
    Mini-Series:
    Episode No1: • Ultimate SolidWorks Tu...
    Episode No2: • Ultimate SolidWorks Tu...
    Episode No3: • Ultimate SolidWorks Tu...
    Episode No4: • SolidWorks 2021| Begin...

ความคิดเห็น • 48

  • @juliusnadar7802
    @juliusnadar7802 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Pure genius

  • @anasassi1661
    @anasassi1661 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Also can you make a special video about the shortcuts in solidworks (like the useful ones)

    • @with-Aryan
      @with-Aryan  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I believe I did that once, haven't I?

  • @divinebahaiknowledge
    @divinebahaiknowledge ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video Aryan joon.

  • @xanderwusky
    @xanderwusky 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imo geometric and organic design are 2 very different things and very few people can do both.
    Personally I do mostly engineering and I can do some furniture and buildings (already way less though)
    Doesn’t mean you can’t do any organic design but honestly it’s probably better to ask someone else

  • @anasassi1661
    @anasassi1661 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey aryan . Great video. Can you make a video explaining how you have draw your version of the water tape ?

    • @with-Aryan
      @with-Aryan  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I wish I could help you wihth that really, but I have so many videos in the pipeline that I cannot upload that anytime soon

    • @radolearn
      @radolearn ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@with-Aryan as long as you can make it some day 🙂 would love to follow along

  • @guilhermebertolaccini247
    @guilhermebertolaccini247 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I work on Manufacture & Engineering tree, but does realy solidworks a usefull tool on Modeling Surfaces and Architecture? Always learning how solidworks is capable

    • @with-Aryan
      @with-Aryan  ปีที่แล้ว

      architecture? very limited. possible, but not recommended. Surfaces , yes, but not the easiest

    • @guilhermebertolaccini247
      @guilhermebertolaccini247 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@with-Aryan Lol these options o would use autocad ou sketchup or something else

    • @omegadeepblue1407
      @omegadeepblue1407 ปีที่แล้ว

      For surfaces Catia V5 and Rhinoceros are more cappable for architecture you can use Autocad and Revit.

  • @yuhjt
    @yuhjt ปีที่แล้ว

    Great short Aryan. I'm here wondering how you modeled the sculpture in Solidworks.
    Did you import it?

    • @with-Aryan
      @with-Aryan  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes I did, that's STL

  • @Vincent57221
    @Vincent57221 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is true

  • @Sebgear
    @Sebgear 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I work with engineering CAD software on a daily basis. It is my job to do so. I cannot wrap my head around the mindset needed to design a free-form design. I have tried to use blender to design simple things. However all my years of experience in SolidWorks, Siemens NX and Fusion 360 are useless the moment I open Blender. The way of working is just completely different to the point that it might as well be the difference between English and Chinese. Yes, you can make similar things with those pieces of software, but you cannot just move from one to the other and expect not to struggle a lot at first.
    I have a deep respect for people who can create a model with blender using a method I can only describe as sculpting with clay. It's just not for me. My brain doesn't function that way.

  • @mixlearningtv4800
    @mixlearningtv4800 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you sir, may i get the organic surface modelling file?if you give me organic surface modelling file so i will be able learn how to create
    like this type doll.

  • @sylvian98765432100
    @sylvian98765432100 ปีที่แล้ว

    Engg and organic/ surfacing are my interests

    • @with-Aryan
      @with-Aryan  ปีที่แล้ว

      Then come to the world of SOLIDWORKS+3DExperience

  • @omnissiah9984
    @omnissiah9984 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My eyes hurt just by seeing that Viking-y character on solidwork interface. Man, the amount of effort that would've taken.

    • @with-Aryan
      @with-Aryan  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That's just an import! you cannot make that in solidworks that's the whole point!

    • @ldt8904
      @ldt8904 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are very confident claiming two things:
      1. No-one is proficient in all three
      2. Impossible to model that character in solidworks
      You must have some reason to be so confident with these claims..

    • @omnissiah9984
      @omnissiah9984 ปีที่แล้ว

      @ Idt8904 I don't know about 1 but for 2, I also think it is next to impossible. Even if it is possible, why should you? It is always unwise to use a wrong tool for a job. It is like playing games with a Mac. You can but you shouldnt

    • @ldt8904
      @ldt8904 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@omnissiah9984 it's not that as hard as you claim. Most cad (I use inventor) has pretty decent surface modelling environment built in. Inventor calls it freeform modelling. Not specifically optimised for this type of modelling, but definitely possible. So even next-to-impossible is too strong a word. I usually use blender when messing around with organic shapes, but can achieve the exact same result in inventor, which I only use for parametric modelling (work)
      Impossible is the wrong word to use. Maybe it's a language barrier issue, but my point still stands.
      1. It is not impossible to become proficient in all three types.
      2.poly and sub-D modelling are available in most CAD modelling software. Even solidworks has xShape. It may be more time-consuming, and you may need to get creative with workarounds, but 'impossible' or 'next-to-impossible', it is not.
      If free blender was not an option, I would consider learning better workflows in inventor freeform modelling to satisfy any organic shapes I wanted to create.
      Thanks for responding 👍

    • @omnissiah9984
      @omnissiah9984 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ldt8904 Right! I get your point. It is just that I often model bottles of different designs in Solidworks, mostly for mold making. Not exactly organic shapes but it still takes me a lot of time if the model is complex. I can't use Blender or Zbrush because I am not sure to what degree they are reliable when it comes to dimensions. I wish I could. My point is if you are tasked to model a Viking, shouldn't you use the right tools for the job instead of sticking to the wrong ones just because you can.

  • @albertsitoe7340
    @albertsitoe7340 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Then there is Rhino

    • @with-Aryan
      @with-Aryan  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Haha Good one. its like the jack of all traits for sure, but again lacks features in Motion studies/sheetmetal. The good news is its expensive plugin library.

  • @user-pc2tu6pr9z
    @user-pc2tu6pr9z ปีที่แล้ว

    where category is the best paid?

    • @with-Aryan
      @with-Aryan  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      can't say it like that. Too many factors are involved.

    • @omegadeepblue1407
      @omegadeepblue1407 ปีที่แล้ว

      Depends of your country, the skills, the software and the experience.

  • @Thijs.
    @Thijs. ปีที่แล้ว

    Talks about 3 catogries abut only shows solid works

    • @with-Aryan
      @with-Aryan  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      In the long video I explain that I am not (and no one is) an expert in all 3.

    • @Thijs.
      @Thijs. ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@with-Aryan oh I am sorry then.

  • @jimmyprasetyo6727
    @jimmyprasetyo6727 ปีที่แล้ว

    no one going expert of 3 of those kind ? hold my beer 😎

    • @with-Aryan
      @with-Aryan  ปีที่แล้ว

      More power to you, at times its not a bad idea to know a little of each, a jack of all trades is highly sought after in today's Job market as well.

    • @madheeh
      @madheeh หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@with-Aryan I am doing great though cannot say expert with the three categories, but those are tools. Creating a compelling design or concept is far more difficult than learning the tools

  • @matdl5472
    @matdl5472 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is nobody an expert in all three?

    • @with-Aryan
      @with-Aryan  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      because there is no need to be! Unless you really want to

    • @matdl5472
      @matdl5472 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@with-Aryan you explained it like its from avatar the last airbender😶

    • @DThorn619
      @DThorn619 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There once was someone who had mastered all three, but we lost them many years ago. Ever since all three groups have argued on which software was the best, the CAD wars are imminent.

    • @mib1296
      @mib1296 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      at my company where i do my internship i need to do 3d builds in solidworks, commercial visualisations with surface moddelling etc solidworks and shapr3d and using finally autocad for the 2d plan for the cutting machines :) i have headaches but i love it (at uni we use solidworks +fusion360)

    • @omegadeepblue1407
      @omegadeepblue1407 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@mib1296In México we refer to that person as "Todologo" in english will be "Allologist".