I work on Manufacture & Engineering tree, but does realy solidworks a usefull tool on Modeling Surfaces and Architecture? Always learning how solidworks is capable
Imo geometric and organic design are 2 very different things and very few people can do both. Personally I do mostly engineering and I can do some furniture and buildings (already way less though) Doesn’t mean you can’t do any organic design but honestly it’s probably better to ask someone else
I work with engineering CAD software on a daily basis. It is my job to do so. I cannot wrap my head around the mindset needed to design a free-form design. I have tried to use blender to design simple things. However all my years of experience in SolidWorks, Siemens NX and Fusion 360 are useless the moment I open Blender. The way of working is just completely different to the point that it might as well be the difference between English and Chinese. Yes, you can make similar things with those pieces of software, but you cannot just move from one to the other and expect not to struggle a lot at first. I have a deep respect for people who can create a model with blender using a method I can only describe as sculpting with clay. It's just not for me. My brain doesn't function that way.
thank you sir, may i get the organic surface modelling file?if you give me organic surface modelling file so i will be able learn how to create like this type doll.
You are very confident claiming two things: 1. No-one is proficient in all three 2. Impossible to model that character in solidworks You must have some reason to be so confident with these claims..
@ Idt8904 I don't know about 1 but for 2, I also think it is next to impossible. Even if it is possible, why should you? It is always unwise to use a wrong tool for a job. It is like playing games with a Mac. You can but you shouldnt
@@omnissiah9984 it's not that as hard as you claim. Most cad (I use inventor) has pretty decent surface modelling environment built in. Inventor calls it freeform modelling. Not specifically optimised for this type of modelling, but definitely possible. So even next-to-impossible is too strong a word. I usually use blender when messing around with organic shapes, but can achieve the exact same result in inventor, which I only use for parametric modelling (work) Impossible is the wrong word to use. Maybe it's a language barrier issue, but my point still stands. 1. It is not impossible to become proficient in all three types. 2.poly and sub-D modelling are available in most CAD modelling software. Even solidworks has xShape. It may be more time-consuming, and you may need to get creative with workarounds, but 'impossible' or 'next-to-impossible', it is not. If free blender was not an option, I would consider learning better workflows in inventor freeform modelling to satisfy any organic shapes I wanted to create. Thanks for responding 👍
@@ldt8904 Right! I get your point. It is just that I often model bottles of different designs in Solidworks, mostly for mold making. Not exactly organic shapes but it still takes me a lot of time if the model is complex. I can't use Blender or Zbrush because I am not sure to what degree they are reliable when it comes to dimensions. I wish I could. My point is if you are tasked to model a Viking, shouldn't you use the right tools for the job instead of sticking to the wrong ones just because you can.
Haha Good one. its like the jack of all traits for sure, but again lacks features in Motion studies/sheetmetal. The good news is its expensive plugin library.
@@with-Aryan I am doing great though cannot say expert with the three categories, but those are tools. Creating a compelling design or concept is far more difficult than learning the tools
There once was someone who had mastered all three, but we lost them many years ago. Ever since all three groups have argued on which software was the best, the CAD wars are imminent.
at my company where i do my internship i need to do 3d builds in solidworks, commercial visualisations with surface moddelling etc solidworks and shapr3d and using finally autocad for the 2d plan for the cutting machines :) i have headaches but i love it (at uni we use solidworks +fusion360)
![เปิดบ้าน โคตรสวย ป๋องกพล รู้จักตั้งนาน เพิ่งรู้ว่ารวย!!! l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tmgCF_2HfYI/mqdefault.jpg)
Pure genius
Thanks!
Also can you make a special video about the shortcuts in solidworks (like the useful ones)
I believe I did that once, haven't I?
Great video Aryan joon.
Thanks dada
I work on Manufacture & Engineering tree, but does realy solidworks a usefull tool on Modeling Surfaces and Architecture? Always learning how solidworks is capable
architecture? very limited. possible, but not recommended. Surfaces , yes, but not the easiest
@@with-Aryan Lol these options o would use autocad ou sketchup or something else
For surfaces Catia V5 and Rhinoceros are more cappable for architecture you can use Autocad and Revit.
Imo geometric and organic design are 2 very different things and very few people can do both.
Personally I do mostly engineering and I can do some furniture and buildings (already way less though)
Doesn’t mean you can’t do any organic design but honestly it’s probably better to ask someone else
I work with engineering CAD software on a daily basis. It is my job to do so. I cannot wrap my head around the mindset needed to design a free-form design. I have tried to use blender to design simple things. However all my years of experience in SolidWorks, Siemens NX and Fusion 360 are useless the moment I open Blender. The way of working is just completely different to the point that it might as well be the difference between English and Chinese. Yes, you can make similar things with those pieces of software, but you cannot just move from one to the other and expect not to struggle a lot at first.
I have a deep respect for people who can create a model with blender using a method I can only describe as sculpting with clay. It's just not for me. My brain doesn't function that way.
Hey aryan . Great video. Can you make a video explaining how you have draw your version of the water tape ?
I wish I could help you wihth that really, but I have so many videos in the pipeline that I cannot upload that anytime soon
@@with-Aryan as long as you can make it some day 🙂 would love to follow along
Great short Aryan. I'm here wondering how you modeled the sculpture in Solidworks.
Did you import it?
Yes I did, that's STL
Engg and organic/ surfacing are my interests
Then come to the world of SOLIDWORKS+3DExperience
thank you sir, may i get the organic surface modelling file?if you give me organic surface modelling file so i will be able learn how to create
like this type doll.
My eyes hurt just by seeing that Viking-y character on solidwork interface. Man, the amount of effort that would've taken.
That's just an import! you cannot make that in solidworks that's the whole point!
You are very confident claiming two things:
1. No-one is proficient in all three
2. Impossible to model that character in solidworks
You must have some reason to be so confident with these claims..
@ Idt8904 I don't know about 1 but for 2, I also think it is next to impossible. Even if it is possible, why should you? It is always unwise to use a wrong tool for a job. It is like playing games with a Mac. You can but you shouldnt
@@omnissiah9984 it's not that as hard as you claim. Most cad (I use inventor) has pretty decent surface modelling environment built in. Inventor calls it freeform modelling. Not specifically optimised for this type of modelling, but definitely possible. So even next-to-impossible is too strong a word. I usually use blender when messing around with organic shapes, but can achieve the exact same result in inventor, which I only use for parametric modelling (work)
Impossible is the wrong word to use. Maybe it's a language barrier issue, but my point still stands.
1. It is not impossible to become proficient in all three types.
2.poly and sub-D modelling are available in most CAD modelling software. Even solidworks has xShape. It may be more time-consuming, and you may need to get creative with workarounds, but 'impossible' or 'next-to-impossible', it is not.
If free blender was not an option, I would consider learning better workflows in inventor freeform modelling to satisfy any organic shapes I wanted to create.
Thanks for responding 👍
@@ldt8904 Right! I get your point. It is just that I often model bottles of different designs in Solidworks, mostly for mold making. Not exactly organic shapes but it still takes me a lot of time if the model is complex. I can't use Blender or Zbrush because I am not sure to what degree they are reliable when it comes to dimensions. I wish I could. My point is if you are tasked to model a Viking, shouldn't you use the right tools for the job instead of sticking to the wrong ones just because you can.
where category is the best paid?
can't say it like that. Too many factors are involved.
Depends of your country, the skills, the software and the experience.
This is true
Then there is Rhino
Haha Good one. its like the jack of all traits for sure, but again lacks features in Motion studies/sheetmetal. The good news is its expensive plugin library.
no one going expert of 3 of those kind ? hold my beer 😎
More power to you, at times its not a bad idea to know a little of each, a jack of all trades is highly sought after in today's Job market as well.
@@with-Aryan I am doing great though cannot say expert with the three categories, but those are tools. Creating a compelling design or concept is far more difficult than learning the tools
Talks about 3 catogries abut only shows solid works
In the long video I explain that I am not (and no one is) an expert in all 3.
@@with-Aryan oh I am sorry then.
Why is nobody an expert in all three?
because there is no need to be! Unless you really want to
@@with-Aryan you explained it like its from avatar the last airbender😶
There once was someone who had mastered all three, but we lost them many years ago. Ever since all three groups have argued on which software was the best, the CAD wars are imminent.
at my company where i do my internship i need to do 3d builds in solidworks, commercial visualisations with surface moddelling etc solidworks and shapr3d and using finally autocad for the 2d plan for the cutting machines :) i have headaches but i love it (at uni we use solidworks +fusion360)
@@mib1296In México we refer to that person as "Todologo" in english will be "Allologist".