I have the following: 10-18mm F4 / 18-105mm F4 / 70-200mm F4 / 50mm F1.8. I agree with you, the 18-105mm is the one I use the most by far. It is such a great lens for shooting in a wide variety of situations. The other lenses I have are great too but only in the right situation. I take mainly still images but I still like having constant F4 so that I do not have to compromise on my settings because I want to zoom in.
I own the 18-105 and the 50 f1.8 as well as a few vintage lenses (a Minolta 135 f/2.8 Rokkor and a Helios 58 f/2). I use the 18-105 almost all the time, unless I’m taking portraits or I’m in low light. It’s a great lens especially for the A6300 because of the OSS.
Hi man! Thanks for the thorough review especially knowing that you’ve been using it for a good year. I am currently using both Sigma 16mm & 30mm on a6500 for travel vlogging. To be honest when backpacking around, I wouldnt really change my lens since it’s not so versatile. As much as I am loving the sharpness of prime lens, I am really thinking of selling both for 18-105mm. At the end, as a budget traveler I feel like versatility does matter and I only want to carry one lens. What would be your suggestion since you have all three lenses?
I totally hear what you’re saying Syifa! I carry around all three all the time and my backpack gets pretty cumbersome(I always carry too much stuff) as far as other suggestions... what kind of images do you take? And is it mostly video or photo?
Syifa Adriana you have same arsenal of lenses as me, im not impressed with 18-105, its not very sharp and not very good indoors, prime lenses are awesome
Then to be honest I’d say the 18-105 is your best choice! There are a couple other lenses that might be a good choice if you did primarily photography, but this thing was made for video!
My budget was pretty tight when I bought my a7iii so this was the first lens I bought. Love the variety I get from this lens. I think it’s a solid choice and will hold me off for a while.
That’s great! I’ve been thinking about an a7iii but would probably have to live with my apsc lenses for a while, so it’s good to hear they do the trick!
All people talk about the crazy sharpness they can have with crazy lens.... But for the moment I have only the kit lens (16-50) and it's an awesome lens, I took some crazy photos with ! But I think I will be the 18-105mm because it's more versatile than the kit lens. And I you think it's more sharp than the kit lens, it will be perfect ! Thank you again for your video, big thumb up from france ;)
People definitely don’t give the kit lens enough credit. It’s still a good lens. I think this 18-105 is the perfect upgrade though. For a bit more versatility and a bit better quality! Thanks for watching and greetings from Canada!
The kit lens is fantastic - its ridiculously small and light, performs well, has OSS, and takes outstanding pictures. Its the poster child for what the APS-C is supposed to be. Love your kit lens that's why its the kit lens.
Hi Dunna, thanks for creating this video for us! You also used a lot of movement and titles and video examples in this video so it was entertaining and informative at the same time, amazing job done here! And I have to say I truly appreciate all the lenghts you went to to show the strengths and weaknesses of the lens, use cases and comparisons. Most TH-camrs just state the obvious facts that everyone knows, but you introduced new aspects, gave your honest opinion and convinced me of the quality of this lens! I will definitely buy the 18-105 now! Keep going with your videos, I'm sure many people also appreciate the time and effort you put into these high quality videos and more and more people will come to your channel right for that!
Wow thank you for those kind words! I’m so glad that you enjoy my videos and find them helpful! Thanks for asking a question!! When you get around to picking up the lens I hope you really enjoy it!
hi ,thanks for the awesome review, have a question , do you think its worth to get sony 6400 with : 16-50mm " only cost 100 extra and Lens Kit and Sony 18-105 F4 you mentioned its wide enough for vloging or just get 6400 16 50 with Sony 10-18mm Wide-Angle Zoom Lens , thanks
I personally use 16mm and 18mm for vlogging no problem, but I know people who want it to be wider and go with the 10-18. Unfortunately there is no way to know until you try. That being said, get the kit lens. If nothing else you can usually sell it for just over the $100 you paid for it.
I voted big time with my dollars to have this lens. It, like your situation, is on my camera 80% of the time. I had alpha mount cameras and lenses. I really like my alpha mount Sony 16-50 f2.8 and Sigma 70-200 f2.8 (my favorite lens overall) but the gap between 50mm and 70mm seemed to be what I needed very often. The closest thing to this 18-105 in the alpha mount just didn't work for me. So I ended up selling most of my alpha mount lenses and two camera bodies to switch to an a6500 and a set of e mount lenses earlier this year. I still have an alpha mount Sony A77 and the 16-50 and 70-200. Those lenses didn't work well on the e mount adapter. But after the dust settled I'm so pleased with the a6500 and the 18-105. Yes the 18-105 isn't as sharp as the wonderful other lenses, but it's sharp enough for me and I'm fussy about sharpness. The range is great and if I want to I can use Clear Image Zoom to extend the range. I'm not big into video and people say the powered zoom is for video. I use the power zoom a lot to frame still shots. It zooms silently. It isn't too heavy. I really like this lens. I wish it was an f2.8 but it would likely be much larger and way more expensive. I have the 16-50 kit lens too and use it regularly. It isn't the greatest lens but it is so small it turns my a6500 into a convenient pocket camera. Again with Clear Image Zoom I can get out to 100mm with it. My f2.8 20mm was probably a waste of money. I bought it as a pancake but it isn't that much smaller than the kit lens. The sharpest lens I have is the f1.8 35mm but it is too limiting for most run and gun days, although it is great for indoor shots where there is movement in the subject like indoor sports.
Thanks for the review! How do you like the power zoom feature? I saw a sample from another video and I was like..."damn, now I can be like Wes Anderson!" Is the power zoom smooth for video? Is it easy to ease into and out of?
It's hard to believe that I still didn't find any lens with constant or fixed aperture that provides that much of a focal length range. This lens may be more than six years old now, but boy this is my all time favourite lens. Once I've seen any brand come up with similar product like this Sony lens, I definitely wouldn't bother selling it.
This has always been my most wanted lens since I got my a6000 and watching this vid hasn't helped that...lol. Great info as always. Hope the van situation got fixed.
Hey Donna, I recently bought sony a6600 with 18-105, but the footage is not good at all....so many grains/noise...even shooting in the day time😔...can u tell me what settings you keep for day light and for low light...please need your help.. And which picture profile do u use? And one more thing, while shooting inside a house I see so much Flickr and grains... Please please help with your settings and picture profile? Iso? Aperture? Please help
Man, you helped me BIG TIME with your words about extension and rebalancing the gimbal. I watched so many videos but you were the only one paying attention to this! Thank you so much!
Your videos have all the answers for my questions, right on point. Really happy to find your channel, it's fun, easy to watch and so INFORMATIVE. You deserve a lot bigger audience
This is a fantastic lens I use this on my Sony a 7R2 for not only video but I also get 18 megapixel sized images for photography so it’s really very versatile. Nice review,)
I always tell people when they are picking out lenses to think what they would use them for, what situations, how close is the subject, is it large or small, etc. For example, how useful is a long range telephoto in close quarters. Or, how useful is a super wide angle at a baseball game. Sure, arguably you still could get interesting photos depending what shot you’re going for. I heard one photographer once say, “zoom lenses for day, fixed primes for night,” and i always thought that was a fairly solid idea. I find myself in so many situations always thinking “DAMN, if only I had one more stop of light!” So I tend to lean towards primes, haha.
Man! What if I have to film a video podcast with my a6400? Which Lens do u suggest me to use? I'll be in a normal room, with a desk and 4 people (a sort of "L", with 2 / 2 ) . I have also to do, some zoom on faces ....I'll have - other the a6400 - 2 others S20 Ultra as camera, in order to cover different angles, but I thought the a6400 was the one that will let me to zoom on faces, in order to do a good work on post matching all the cameras.... thank you man! Sorry if it was long Please I'm just a beginner, let me know...Thank you so so much! :)
I just recently purchased this lens used for cheap. I needed this as main lens for events. If ever I needed b-roll, I can just quickly change into my Sigma 30mm 1.4 or 50mm. But for most shots, this thing does a great job. Love the review! Binge watching right now. 😎
Would this work well for our TH-cam podcast that is shot at an inside bar with a distance of about 6’ from the camera and two people siting about 3’ apart behind the bar. We are well lit and using a HDMI capture card for clearer video. Camera is a A6100 about 3 months old. Kit lens does a pretty good job so far. Thank you very much for the content and great job.
That's a tough one... I have owned this lens for at least a couple of years now and it has been pretty superb for me. Recently used it to shoot a wedding video and to take pictures of the guests at the wedding. While I had my Sigma 16mm lens with me, I wasn't tempted to use it. I always get consistent good results with the lens to be honest. Would be good if Sony released a f2.8 constant aperture version of this lens. I would be snapping it up asap.... Thanks for the great video as well....
Unless you’re shooting in a studio, your work is being blown up on a giant screen (at high res) or you need to shoot with a giant aperture, it rarely makes sense to lug around a set of primes these days. You’re probably just making your life more difficult. Camera sensors are so sensitive and zooms have become pretty sharp.
My priority list of lenses for video: 1 - zoom lens (Sony 18-105mm f4) 2 - fixed “art” lens (Sigma 30mm f1.4) 3 - wide-angle (Rokinon 12mm f2.0 or Sony 10-18mm f4 if you can afford it)
I have #2 and #3. But I don't have #1... Do you think it's worth trading sony 1018 to sony 18-105? I'm looking for a lens that I can take for my trip to London.
Oh look, I'm back here. Contemplating swapping out my 16-55 f/2.8 for this lens. Why? Because the added reach (almost double) is becoming more of a thing as I'm getting more into sports photography / videography (disc golf, mostly). Thanks, Dunna, you're a continuing source of knowledge for so many of us.
I’d probably prefer the 18-135 over this one for the smaller size, less weight, and wider range. Did try the 18-105 in store though, quality is definitely top notch!
Well I also have this one in my ‘lineup‘ but I was a bit disappointed of its still image quality. If there’s only one lens I can carry for my aps-c, I would say it’s Sigma 16mm f1.4 Thanks for sharing the video. Your videos have always been informative & fun!
Dunna your videos are awesome! Super genuine and insightful! Just subbed! Hey for an a6000 In (2022) dated I know but on a budget lol… do you think this Sony 18-105 or the new sigma 18-50? I would get the sigma but the oss and reach of the Sony makes me question it! Mainly for video ! Thanks man!
I couldn’t agree more with the title! The 18-105mm f4 G is permanently mounted on my a6000. I am shooting 90% of the time in urban environments (street photography and cityscapes) and the versatility of this lens lefts nothing to be desired. It ticks all the three of my must have boxes: build quality, fast and accurate focus mechanism and constant aperture. And a tip: the image quality can be superb at infinity only by MF. I thought that this lens was pretty soft for far subjects (like landscapes or cityscapes) but after some experimentation with MF I managed to shoot images that rivals my other Zeiss prime lenses! While for closer focus distances or portraits the AF is 100% accurate, to infinity struggles heavily and this is maybe a reason for the inconsistent score on various reviews in terms of sharpness. But, no, this lens is very sharp if you can achieve correct focus (I have very high keeper rate with MF, is very smooth in this lens).
Hi I'm buying the A6400 with kitlens 16-50 and sony 18-105 f4. i want to buy one more lens but I'm confused whether i should go with the sigma16mm f1.4 or the sigma 30mm f1.4. My use is travel vlogging so what should i choose. Please let me know. Thank you
Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 by far the best lens I have ever paired with the a6500. With the mc-11 adapter that sigma has made specifically for it, you usually get about 90% auto focus speed compared to a native lens, which in my opinion is fantastic. Also can’t beat the 1.8 bokeh compared to the f/4
I would agree with having the sigma 18-35 but that setup is so big I only use it to record video for youtube in my office. I rather the Sony 35 1.8 or the sigma 30 for there size and sharpness. Plus I find that the adapter drains battery when the camera is off
The Broke Consumer it’s nothing compared to a Canon 1DMX1 w/ 24-70 on it, with Sony we are being spoiled already. Also, being able to punch in and out is incredibly crucial and I have found that in my experience it can be the difference between a great shot and an okay shot. And I use a grip on my camera so battery isn’t such an issue to me.
Hi Dunna. First of all thank you for all the knowledge you let me have with your videos. I found your channel searching for how to shoot and manage S-Log and i'm still watching your videos and leaning a lot of things. Thank You! After that, i have a question about this lens. Would you recommend it for shooting videoclips, or film making in general? I have a Sony ZV E10 with kit lens and a Sigma 30mm 1.4 and i was thinking about adding one more lens in order to improve my versatility. I'd really appreciate your thoughts about it and some advices. Thank you Dunna!
I use the Sony 18-135mm most of the time. It's only flaw in my opinion is low light shooting but I don't really take that many photos where there's not enough light.
got this lens as my first (except the kit), been using it ever since most of the time for nearly everything. always my lens recommendation to anyone ask me which lens to buy for sony aps-c
I was thinking about going with the sigma 16 f1.4 for my first lens other than my kit lens. But now I kinda want the zoom capability, what’s the difference in quality between the sigma and this 18-105?
There is a 24-105 lens that I think is supposed to be the similar equivalent to this one, but I don’t have any personal experience with it. Maybe worth checking out?? Also check out the tamron 28-75mm f2.8.
Dunna Did It I mostly use it walking for photos. Great at Sporting events (MLB baseball) when I need up close shots of family, zoomed in shots of players, and wide angle shots of the stadium
I bought this lens 6 months ago. Compared to the kit lens, 20mm f2, 35mm f1.8 or even the 55-210, this lens took a little bit to get used to because of the extra size and weight. On a recent NYC trip, I debated whether to take this lens or the kit lens but at the end, I took the 18-105 with me and I am glad that I did. The extra reach and flexibility allowed me to get some great shots. The f4 performed okay when the sun went down so I typically switched to the 35mm f1.8. A major gripe for me was that the lens is so big that it would cast a shadow on my subject whenever I used flash. In several back lit situations, those shots were severely hampered by it. Aside from that, this is a great lens. Even though I don't shoot video, I appreciated the constant aperture and the non-extendable barrel. I haven't tried the 18-135 but if that has different trade-offs as well.
I was looking at getting the A6400 and foregoing the kit lens and get this for general photography and then some Sigma primes for video. I have the 18-135mm for my Canon but the f/5.6 at the end kills me sometimes when it starts to get darker just after sunset.
I really wanted the Sony E 16-55mm 2.8 G for the amazing quality that it produces, it’s the price that is as you said, “arm and a leg.” I’m looking to have this as a versatile travel lense for travels, some landscape. Would you recommend this for landscape photography?
@@dunnadidit I meant to ask if the 18-105 would be a good choice/alternative. I've seen some vloggers use it for their travel, just wanted to see if it's good for landscapes as well. I also have a sigma 1.4 16mm as my secondary lense. Just putting it out there, love the channel it's always the go to when I need some photography questions answered thanks for that!
Hi. I have a little loose sound that you can hear if you tilt the lens up and down, its like something is loose inside that makes a little sound... It is only like this when the camera is turned off. When its on there is no sound at all.. Could it be the OSS mecanism that is like this or is the lens might broken? It does work excellent in both movie and photos. Do you have the same thing on your lens?
It's the best lens for Sony APS-C when paired with a gimball and a6500 (see my chatuchak weekend market video). Zooming happens within the lens so you don't need to worry about the gimball not being balanced. The only downside is low light performance, so in evening I recommend you switch to 35mm f1.8
Agree, I have had this lens for a couple years and it is my walk about lens. At f4 it is not a great event lens as auto focus will hunt in low light. If you have had this lens for a bit, there is a lens firmware update that seemed to me to improve it performance on the a6500 that I shoot with.
Hey. Im still thinking about this lens, since i have the kit 16-50mm and a 50mm f1.8 and im still trying to find a good enough use for the 50-105 range. Also ive heard the lens isnt that sharp and on 18mm its so much more zoomed than 16mm kit. Still thinking about it and also ive seen the 55-210mm. What do you think is better and for what? Thank you a lot.
Great review! I have the a6000 and this lens is perfect for it. I also have a Sony FE 70-200 mm constant aperture 4.0 which translates out to 105-300 on an cropped sensor so I've got the complete focal range of 18 to 300 covered! For the money I think this lens is a great investment paired with the FE 70-200. It's all I need!
Wow. Been watching your videos for nearly half a year now and stumbled across this one. Your videos have really levelled up from 5 years ago. Well done! I notice the background noise in this video, and in comparison your most recent ones are silent. Any advice on how you improved your sound from then until now?
Oh yeah it's massive! Even more on an apsc body.. But til i really love having 24 / 35 / 50 / 70 prime Lens quality in one Lens, i don't know what to get.. Of course for TH-cam talking stuff it's too much, but for client work for events / weddings it's an insane Lens to have i guess!
I was in a dilemma on whether to purchase this lens or some of the other options. The answer to all the questions that I had in my mind just poired in. Great review!! Thanks for making such useful content ❤
For the Sony a6000 series I would happy with a faster version of the kit lens, say a 16-70 f2.8. I know there is the Zeiss 16-70 f4 but the reviews on that are very iffy plus it costs almost $1000. Surely someone can do better? (I'd even settle for a 16-50 or 16-55 f2.8). [edit] I should say that the small form factor is a big deal for me, which is my main objection to the 18-105. Plus I prefer wider at the low end than long reach.
I hear you 100%. I wouldn’t hold your breath though. I would even love to see a bit of a less expensive 16-35 f2.8. The only one is the master and it’s like $3000(CAD) and it’s a big lens! I’m going to be doing a comparison between the 16-70 and the 18-105 soon. The 16-70 is nice and small but I hear what you’re saying about the reviews. It’s not the sharpest lens for sure (still better than the kit lens though I suppose).
sony zies 16-70, rocks. Buy it on special or from a second hand exchange. I bought it on special (30% off xmas deal) I'm stoked with it... I also have the sony 90mmG so know that level of sharpness. The 16-70, being less sharp than the 90 et al (marginally), gives a slight softness that I like. I bought the 90 for portraits, and macro of course, but for portraits I'll often switch to the zies. So per the video, if I had only one choice I'd sell the gear for heroin.
2 ปีที่แล้ว
Your wishes have been heard. There is the amazing 16-55 mm F2.8 G lens.
Love your videos as per usual! But just wanted to know if this lens would be good for youtube video(mostly tutorials) i was looking into the 16 1.4 but totally open to others. What would you recommend?
It’s absolutely awesome for youtube videos, it might not be as necessary for tutorials if your camera will be on a tripod mostly. The great thing about this lens is the versatility of a zoom range. But for most of my TH-cam tutorials and talking videos, I use a prime lens like the sigma 30mm f1.4(most used) or the 16mm f1.4(second most used)
I have a 17-50 sigma and im looking to upgrade to rhis lens. It isnt the sharpest and i have to use manual focus because there is no e mount capability.
Thanks for the quick reply. Currently shooting with the GH5, though thinking about moving to Sony. Side note, hate that TH-cam made me reload the video on mobile to see your reply. *shakes fists*
As much as I highly recommend moving to Sony 😉😉 I should mention that sigma makes an M4/3 Mount version of that 30mm as well and people seem to love it! But switch to Sony anyway haha. And yeah I know what you mean about the reload thing. Then you spend 3 minutes trying to figure out where you were in the video so you can pick up.
Hi Dunna. Which do you think is better? This lens or the new 16-55mm f2.8? I would like to purchase only one zoom lens for my a6400 and I am considering the shaprness of the lens too.
I've now binge watched 4 of your reviews, so now I feel comfortable asking my question. I'm brand new to photography beyond point/shoots and my phone. So new I haven't even bought the camera yet (Doing that on Friday). I had already decided that I was getting the 18-105 for my versatile lens, so this video just solidified that decision. Where I'm in purchase paralysis is, I was planning on buying the Sigma 30/1.4 or the 16/1.4 lens. I asked on a FB group what they thought and all I got was it depends on what I like to shoot. I don't have a camera yet... I don't know what I like to shoot. So, as a novice should I stay with only the 18-105, or to add on to your statement in this review, if you could only have TWO lenses, what would they be? Would the 30mm be redundant (except for the better low light performance)? Would the 16mm be a better choice for wide angle shots, again because of the low light performance, or is the 18mm of the 18-105 "good enough" for a beginner?
Ok... here’s two things... 1. If it was me - I would do the 18-105 and the 30mm f1.4. 2. Here’s what I suggest. Get your camera with the 18-105. And then go shoot a whoooolllleeee bunch! If you find yourself at the wide end at 18mm quite often after shooting a bunch, get the 16mm. If you find yourself zooming in a bit, maybe the 30mm. Find out what you are going to shoot most with the versatile lens. And then get a sharper, faster lens at that focal length! Hope that helps!
@@dunnadidit why the 30mm over the 16mm? As far as shooting a bunch to see what I like, I was hoping to take this whole kit (and kaboodle) on my trip to the coast of Spain in a month. I'm kind of in a unique situation that won't allow me to even have my hands on the camera until I'm in Spain (I can DM you on IG if your want to know more). Here's what I'm envisioning shooting most at least for this vacation: skyline from charter boat; various buildings; my wife in front of various scenery; my wife indoors; museum stuff indoors. I know I could get away with the 18-105 for virtually all of that, but I worry about low light situations, especially in museums and restaurants.
I just find the 30mm more useful for what I shoot, but honestly it’s very close with the 16mm. Sounds like the 16mm might actually be better for what you’re looking for!
@@dunnadidit Thank you! I think I will go with the 16mm. From your reviews and everybody else on the Tube, 16mm just seems so much fun to shoot with. And it gives me something else to buy later! ("Honey, I need this 30mm! Dunna Said So!")
Hi Dunna, do you break 180 degree rule by making your shutterspeed higher than twice of its fps? like 120fps at 1/500 to get sharper footage? does slowing the footages down mask the juddery effect cause by high shutterspeed? thanks
Generally I try not to break the 180 rule but sometimes I do just for exposure but I don’t think it gives you “sharper” footage necessarily. I guess less motion blur could be considered sharper 🤷🏻♂️ . And no, slowing the footage down more wont mask it as far as I’m aware.
This 18-105 is definitely the lens I use most on my a6500. Hardly use my 35mm anymore. Shoot both video & still equally, so it makes sense for me. Just found your channel - nice to find someone with so much content I can relate too!
Yeah I hear that, the closest thing I’ve found in that range is the Sigma 18-35 f1.8 which is amazing but you have to have an adapter and it makes it a bit less amazing
Dunna Did It confused as to which lens I want next. Unless, I can find a great deal for the fe70-200mm. Even thought about the 85mm f1.8. Hmm decisions.
Yeah me too! I have all three of those and they all serve their purpose for sure. It would be nice to see something with this range with a bit better aperture though... my 30 and 16 might collect some dust if that was the case haha
What? This lens is at most 15% better than a 16-50 kit lens. There is nothing about this lens I could call quality. While simga 30mm's sharpness at f2.8 can cut your eyes.
Dude!!! Cool video! I have a question: did you listen some sound in your 18-105 when it turns off? I mean, it's like OSS inside slightly moving... Thanks for review, dude!
You mean the little bit of sound inside the lens when you turn on and off the camera? That lens seems to “sweep” through the entire zoom range every time you turn it on, I always thought that was the noise.
hi from india ,recently purchased Sony a6100 so wanted to know whether if i buy Sony 18-105 mm F4 lens ,so does the OSS works with a6100 because a6100 does not have in body stabiliser ,u've been using it, apart from constant aperture which is awesome,because i shoot railway videos so how would it be?. And Your Reviews & Videos Are Awesome & Informative.
Dunna, great video. One lens...so tough. I thought my Zeiss 16-70 f4 would be my one and only but the f4....I'm really enjoying the Sigma 16mm f14 and just recently received the Sigma 30mm f14 for my birthday. I'm going to go out on limb here and say that if i had to choose one it would be the 30mm. I think the length is workable, i.e. if you want closer to the subject then move closer, and further, move further, also the f14 is beast mode! #instagramnotificationsquad get some!
WOOOOOOO! LOVE MY #INSTAGRAMNITIFICATIONSQUAD !!! Yeah the 30 is a close second for me for sure. That thing is a beast for sure. I really wanna try that 16-70 though!
Other than price is there any reason why I might wanna go with the 30 instead of 16? Been thinking about purchasing the 16 and im just hoping it’s the right decision lol
@@mikehunt5626 i love the sigma 16mm, own it as well, but for travel sometimes I wish that I could zoom into subjects... I'm really looking at getting this 24-105.
A little late to the party but we all start from somewhere don't we? Lol. Great video. Very straightforward and very informative. Thank you. A quick question to all, I have slowly got into (Asian) wedding videography so was thinking if this would be good for events such as that? When I say good I do mean in terms of picture/video quality? I know it's not the sharpest out there but is it good enough? 18-105 would be perfect as it can adapt to most situation. To give a little more clarification into my circumstances, I have two cameras (for now) and my idea is to have one on a gimbal (beauty and devote shots), and one set up right in front of the stage (constant). I do have the sigma 16mm f1.4 and also the kit 16-55 and so looking to replace the kit lens. - Not 100% sure yet as to which lens will be on the gimbal and which one on the camera that'll just be facing the stage. Sorry for the long one guys but help a brother out lol
Hey Dunna, what do you think about Tamron 17-70 f2.8? Would it be a better choice over 18-105 f4, or kind of upgrade over 18-105? Will you review it and compare these two, when Tamron releases it's lens? I really like your videos and channel. Great work. 💪😎
Unfortunately I haven’t had the chance to try it yet but I think it would be a great choice! The only real downside is the lack of oss for people on apsc cameras other than the a6600
I should really ask you guys how to pronounce your Instagram handles... 😅😅 Sorry!
Dunna Did It 😂
Dunna Did It You are one of the first people who actually pronounced my name right 😆
WHAT! NO WAY!! I thought I had totally failed on that for sure!!
Even Norwegians have a huge problem to pronounce my name😬
Per - Yeah I probably would have just given up if you had asked a question for this video. “This other person also asked a question 😂”
1mm to 1000mm f0.95
Perfect! Pancake lens too right?
Dunna Did It psssshhhh. Needs to be thicc like a 70-200 to look professional.
Tru tru... dress to impress right?
@@jackofblades6736 lol! Gotta look professional. Hilarious
Here you go, weighs at 50kg.
I really like how he still reply’s to us even if the video is 2 years old!! Such a good TH-camr 👍
I’m tryin!
Respect
Im over 50 years old, and nobody ever listens to me.
I have the following: 10-18mm F4 / 18-105mm F4 / 70-200mm F4 / 50mm F1.8. I agree with you, the 18-105mm is the one I use the most by far. It is such a great lens for shooting in a wide variety of situations. The other lenses I have are great too but only in the right situation. I take mainly still images but I still like having constant F4 so that I do not have to compromise on my settings because I want to zoom in.
That’s great to hear! It really is a great lens!
Lens 18-105 f.4 and 35mm f1.8 is best for me.
Compared to the 50 1.8, is it really more noisy and less sharp?
I own the 18-105 and the 50 f1.8 as well as a few vintage lenses (a Minolta 135 f/2.8 Rokkor and a Helios 58 f/2). I use the 18-105 almost all the time, unless I’m taking portraits or I’m in low light. It’s a great lens especially for the A6300 because of the OSS.
Agreed x100!
Hi man! Thanks for the thorough review especially knowing that you’ve been using it for a good year. I am currently using both Sigma 16mm & 30mm on a6500 for travel vlogging. To be honest when backpacking around, I wouldnt really change my lens since it’s not so versatile. As much as I am loving the sharpness of prime lens, I am really thinking of selling both for 18-105mm. At the end, as a budget traveler I feel like versatility does matter and I only want to carry one lens. What would be your suggestion since you have all three lenses?
I totally hear what you’re saying Syifa! I carry around all three all the time and my backpack gets pretty cumbersome(I always carry too much stuff) as far as other suggestions... what kind of images do you take? And is it mostly video or photo?
Dunna Did It thank you for your quick reply! Only for videography I dont do any photography other than for thumbnail LOL...
Syifa Adriana you have same arsenal of lenses as me, im not impressed with 18-105, its not very sharp and not very good indoors, prime lenses are awesome
Junaid Kureshi Thanks for the insight Junaid! That’s definitely my concern about 18-105 re sharpness. But can’t have the perfect world can we LOL
Then to be honest I’d say the 18-105 is your best choice! There are a couple other lenses that might be a good choice if you did primarily photography, but this thing was made for video!
My budget was pretty tight when I bought my a7iii so this was the first lens I bought. Love the variety I get from this lens. I think it’s a solid choice and will hold me off for a while.
That’s great! I’ve been thinking about an a7iii but would probably have to live with my apsc lenses for a while, so it’s good to hear they do the trick!
All people talk about the crazy sharpness they can have with crazy lens.... But for the moment I have only the kit lens (16-50) and it's an awesome lens, I took some crazy photos with ! But I think I will be the 18-105mm because it's more versatile than the kit lens. And I you think it's more sharp than the kit lens, it will be perfect !
Thank you again for your video, big thumb up from france ;)
People definitely don’t give the kit lens enough credit. It’s still a good lens. I think this 18-105 is the perfect upgrade though. For a bit more versatility and a bit better quality!
Thanks for watching and greetings from Canada!
Photographie & Vidéo The 16-50 is incredibly soft. Once you finally upgrade and start using lenses like the 24-105 then you’ll see a huge difference
TRNDSTTRS yeah that’s over a grand for a lens when most people’s cameras don’t even cost that much. Chill out
The kit lens is fantastic - its ridiculously small and light, performs well, has OSS, and takes outstanding pictures. Its the poster child for what the APS-C is supposed to be. Love your kit lens that's why its the kit lens.
Hi Dunna, thanks for creating this video for us! You also used a lot of movement and titles and video examples in this video so it was entertaining and informative at the same time, amazing job done here! And I have to say I truly appreciate all the lenghts you went to to show the strengths and weaknesses of the lens, use cases and comparisons. Most TH-camrs just state the obvious facts that everyone knows, but you introduced new aspects, gave your honest opinion and convinced me of the quality of this lens! I will definitely buy the 18-105 now!
Keep going with your videos, I'm sure many people also appreciate the time and effort you put into these high quality videos and more and more people will come to your channel right for that!
Wow thank you for those kind words! I’m so glad that you enjoy my videos and find them helpful! Thanks for asking a question!! When you get around to picking up the lens I hope you really enjoy it!
hi ,thanks for the awesome review, have a question , do you think its worth to get sony 6400 with : 16-50mm " only cost 100 extra and Lens Kit and Sony 18-105 F4 you mentioned its wide enough for vloging or just get 6400 16 50 with
Sony 10-18mm Wide-Angle Zoom Lens , thanks
I personally use 16mm and 18mm for vlogging no problem, but I know people who want it to be wider and go with the 10-18. Unfortunately there is no way to know until you try. That being said, get the kit lens. If nothing else you can usually sell it for just over the $100 you paid for it.
@@dunnadidit thanks
I voted big time with my dollars to have this lens. It, like your situation, is on my camera 80% of the time.
I had alpha mount cameras and lenses. I really like my alpha mount Sony 16-50 f2.8 and Sigma 70-200 f2.8 (my favorite lens overall) but the gap between 50mm and 70mm seemed to be what I needed very often. The closest thing to this 18-105 in the alpha mount just didn't work for me. So I ended up selling most of my alpha mount lenses and two camera bodies to switch to an a6500 and a set of e mount lenses earlier this year. I still have an alpha mount Sony A77 and the 16-50 and 70-200. Those lenses didn't work well on the e mount adapter. But after the dust settled I'm so pleased with the a6500 and the 18-105.
Yes the 18-105 isn't as sharp as the wonderful other lenses, but it's sharp enough for me and I'm fussy about sharpness. The range is great and if I want to I can use Clear Image Zoom to extend the range. I'm not big into video and people say the powered zoom is for video. I use the power zoom a lot to frame still shots. It zooms silently. It isn't too heavy. I really like this lens. I wish it was an f2.8 but it would likely be much larger and way more expensive.
I have the 16-50 kit lens too and use it regularly. It isn't the greatest lens but it is so small it turns my a6500 into a convenient pocket camera. Again with Clear Image Zoom I can get out to 100mm with it.
My f2.8 20mm was probably a waste of money. I bought it as a pancake but it isn't that much smaller than the kit lens.
The sharpest lens I have is the f1.8 35mm but it is too limiting for most run and gun days, although it is great for indoor shots where there is movement in the subject like indoor sports.
Thanks for the input John! We definitely see eye to eye on this one!!
I think that would be a great combo! 18-105 for run and gun and the 35 for more planned stuff!
Thanks for the review! How do you like the power zoom feature? I saw a sample from another video and I was like..."damn, now I can be like Wes Anderson!" Is the power zoom smooth for video? Is it easy to ease into and out of?
It's hard to believe that I still didn't find any lens with constant or fixed aperture that provides that much of a focal length range. This lens may be more than six years old now, but boy this is my all time favourite lens. Once I've seen any brand come up with similar product like this Sony lens, I definitely wouldn't bother selling it.
Yeah it still holds up for sure!
Can we use this kens for video?
This has always been my most wanted lens since I got my a6000 and watching this vid hasn't helped that...lol. Great info as always. Hope the van situation got fixed.
I’m so glad this was helpful! Thanks for watching!
Mo (the van) is in the shop now being taken care of 😞 poor girl!
Hey Donna,
I recently bought sony a6600 with 18-105, but the footage is not good at all....so many grains/noise...even shooting in the day time😔...can u tell me what settings you keep for day light and for low light...please need your help..
And which picture profile do u use?
And one more thing, while shooting inside a house I see so much Flickr and grains...
Please please help with your settings and picture profile? Iso? Aperture?
Please help
Probably using wrong settings
Sony, give this guy money. I think I'm buying this lens just because I fell in love with him. [SWOON]
Haha thanks! Feel free to use those affiliate links in the description! 😉
@@dunnadiditdamn bro you better be in them DMs with legendary fizz I don't think I have ever seen a girl flirting with any Sony tube douchers
Man, you helped me BIG TIME with your words about extension and rebalancing the gimbal. I watched so many videos but you were the only one paying attention to this! Thank you so much!
That’s so great to hear! Let me know if you have any more questions!
Your videos have all the answers for my questions, right on point. Really happy to find your channel, it's fun, easy to watch and so INFORMATIVE.
You deserve a lot bigger audience
Thanks so much!! I’m so glad you think so!
This is a fantastic lens I use this on my Sony a 7R2 for not only video but I also get 18 megapixel sized images for photography so it’s really very versatile. Nice review,)
That’s so awesome! I’ve often wondered about apsc lenses on the a7rii and a7riii
Hello, I have Sony a6100 with 50mm lens, I want to upgrade it, which lens I should buy for photos around $700?
I always tell people when they are picking out lenses to think what they would use them for, what situations, how close is the subject, is it large or small, etc. For example, how useful is a long range telephoto in close quarters. Or, how useful is a super wide angle at a baseball game. Sure, arguably you still could get interesting photos depending what shot you’re going for. I heard one photographer once say, “zoom lenses for day, fixed primes for night,” and i always thought that was a fairly solid idea. I find myself in so many situations always thinking “DAMN, if only I had one more stop of light!” So I tend to lean towards primes, haha.
Absolutely love this! Thanks for sharing!
Man! What if I have to film a video podcast with my a6400? Which Lens do u suggest me to use? I'll be in a normal room, with a desk and 4 people (a sort of "L", with 2 / 2 ) . I have also to do, some zoom on faces ....I'll have - other the a6400 - 2 others S20 Ultra as camera, in order to cover different angles, but I thought the a6400 was the one that will let me to zoom on faces, in order to do a good work on post matching all the cameras.... thank you man! Sorry if it was long
Please I'm just a beginner, let me know...Thank you so so much! :)
I just recently purchased this lens used for cheap. I needed this as main lens for events. If ever I needed b-roll, I can just quickly change into my Sigma 30mm 1.4 or 50mm. But for most shots, this thing does a great job.
Love the review! Binge watching right now. 😎
Sounds pretty close to my kit Ryan! Great minds think alike!
Thanks for bingeing! Hope you enjoy!
What's a good used price?
Where did you buy it used from ?
Would this work well for our TH-cam podcast that is shot at an inside bar with a distance of about 6’ from the camera and two people siting about 3’ apart behind the bar. We are well lit and using a HDMI capture card for clearer video. Camera is a A6100 about 3 months old. Kit lens does a pretty good job so far.
Thank you very much for the content and great job.
18-105 is definitely my favorite for an all around lens for my 6300
Nice!!
if it is good for video?
Just scored this lens on ebay open box for 370 dollars and got it today. Things a BEAST
That's a tough one... I have owned this lens for at least a couple of years now and it has been pretty superb for me. Recently used it to shoot a wedding video and to take pictures of the guests at the wedding. While I had my Sigma 16mm lens with me, I wasn't tempted to use it. I always get consistent good results with the lens to be honest. Would be good if Sony released a f2.8 constant aperture version of this lens. I would be snapping it up asap....
Thanks for the great video as well....
I totally agree! It would be nice to have f2.8 for sure but it still does a pretty darn good job :)
Unless you’re shooting in a studio, your work is being blown up on a giant screen (at high res) or you need to shoot with a giant aperture, it rarely makes sense to lug around a set of primes these days. You’re probably just making your life more difficult. Camera sensors are so sensitive and zooms have become pretty sharp.
My priority list of lenses for video:
1 - zoom lens (Sony 18-105mm f4)
2 - fixed “art” lens (Sigma 30mm f1.4)
3 - wide-angle (Rokinon 12mm f2.0 or Sony 10-18mm f4 if you can afford it)
Nice! Replace the 12mm with the sigma 16 f1.4 and you named my whole kit lol!
that's my kit!!
I have #2 and #3. But I don't have #1... Do you think it's worth trading sony 1018 to sony 18-105? I'm looking for a lens that I can take for my trip to London.
Oh look, I'm back here. Contemplating swapping out my 16-55 f/2.8 for this lens. Why? Because the added reach (almost double) is becoming more of a thing as I'm getting more into sports photography / videography (disc golf, mostly). Thanks, Dunna, you're a continuing source of knowledge for so many of us.
I’d probably prefer the 18-135 over this one for the smaller size, less weight, and wider range. Did try the 18-105 in store though, quality is definitely top notch!
I totally hear you, the big winner for this one for me is the constant f4. But it’s a trade off for sure!
Just bought a fx30 just because i found it on a good deal, would this lens be a good match for it? Love your videos, thanks!
Well I also have this one in my ‘lineup‘ but I was a bit disappointed of its still image quality. If there’s only one lens I can carry for my aps-c, I would say it’s Sigma 16mm f1.4
Thanks for sharing the video. Your videos have always been informative & fun!
Thanks for sharing Maxwell!!
Dunna your videos are awesome! Super genuine and insightful! Just subbed! Hey for an a6000 In (2022) dated I know but on a budget lol… do you think this Sony 18-105 or the new sigma 18-50? I would get the sigma but the oss and reach of the Sony makes me question it! Mainly for video ! Thanks man!
Oss makes me want to say 18-105 I think
I have the Sony 6500 and the Sony 18-105 F4 for about 2 months and I love it, I use it for car photography and videos and is amazing.
That’s great Hugo! I just took that same combination on a trip and it was great!!
I couldn’t agree more with the title! The 18-105mm f4 G is permanently mounted on my a6000. I am shooting 90% of the time in urban environments (street photography and cityscapes) and the versatility of this lens lefts nothing to be desired. It ticks all the three of my must have boxes: build quality, fast and accurate focus mechanism and constant aperture.
And a tip: the image quality can be superb at infinity only by MF. I thought that this lens was pretty soft for far subjects (like landscapes or cityscapes) but after some experimentation with MF I managed to shoot images that rivals my other Zeiss prime lenses! While for closer focus distances or portraits the AF is 100% accurate, to infinity struggles heavily and this is maybe a reason for the inconsistent score on various reviews in terms of sharpness. But, no, this lens is very sharp if you can achieve correct focus (I have very high keeper rate with MF, is very smooth in this lens).
Hi I'm buying the A6400 with kitlens 16-50 and sony 18-105 f4. i want to buy one more lens but I'm confused whether i should go with the sigma16mm f1.4 or the sigma 30mm f1.4.
My use is travel vlogging so what should i choose. Please let me know.
Thank you
About to buy this for my 6400. Can’t wait!
Nice! Enjoy!
Awesome content, among this, the sony 16-55 and the sigma 18-50 what will you pick now?
Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 by far the best lens I have ever paired with the a6500. With the mc-11 adapter that sigma has made specifically for it, you usually get about 90% auto focus speed compared to a native lens, which in my opinion is fantastic. Also can’t beat the 1.8 bokeh compared to the f/4
Ahhh I want this so bad!!
I would agree with having the sigma 18-35 but that setup is so big I only use it to record video for youtube in my office. I rather the Sony 35 1.8 or the sigma 30 for there size and sharpness. Plus I find that the adapter drains battery when the camera is off
Very interesting points! I’ve been super interested in the 18-35. Those are good things to keep in mind
The Broke Consumer it’s nothing compared to a Canon 1DMX1 w/ 24-70 on it, with Sony we are being spoiled already. Also, being able to punch in and out is incredibly crucial and I have found that in my experience it can be the difference between a great shot and an okay shot. And I use a grip on my camera so battery isn’t such an issue to me.
Yeah, but honestly using f1.8 for portraits is kind of too much: if you focus on the eyes you lost focus on other parts of the face.
Hi Dunna. First of all thank you for all the knowledge you let me have with your videos. I found your channel searching for how to shoot and manage S-Log and i'm still watching your videos and leaning a lot of things. Thank You!
After that, i have a question about this lens. Would you recommend it for shooting videoclips, or film making in general? I have a Sony ZV E10 with kit lens and a Sigma 30mm 1.4 and i was thinking about adding one more lens in order to improve my versatility. I'd really appreciate your thoughts about it and some advices. Thank you Dunna!
This would be a great lens for versatility. Though, also check into the Tamron 17-70… it’s also quite versatile but a bit newer.
@@dunnadidit Thank you Dunna! I'l give it a check
I use the Sony 18-135mm most of the time. It's only flaw in my opinion is low light shooting but I don't really take that many photos where there's not enough light.
I think the only thing that is stopping me from switching to the 18-135 is the changing aperture. If they had made it constant f4... game over.
Gotta love how you inserted the 𝗩𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗛𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲 ad! ♥️ 1:17
😞 RIP vitalhouse
got this lens as my first (except the kit), been using it ever since most of the time for nearly everything.
always my lens recommendation to anyone ask me which lens to buy for sony aps-c
Awesome!! Love it!
I was thinking about going with the sigma 16 f1.4 for my first lens other than my kit lens. But now I kinda want the zoom capability, what’s the difference in quality between the sigma and this 18-105?
@@gioortiz8459 same man!!! That's what I was thinking, too!
Y’all should keep an eye out for the tamron 17-70 f2.8 coming out soon. It might make me change my mind on this one
@@dunnadidit Awesome, I’ll surely check this one out!
nice review man. Please tell me, what lens would you recommend for sony a7III ? something like this one, wide and some zoom too. Thank you
There is a 24-105 lens that I think is supposed to be the similar equivalent to this one, but I don’t have any personal experience with it. Maybe worth checking out?? Also check out the tamron 28-75mm f2.8.
@@dunnadidit i will check. Thank you !
I chose the new 18-135 over the 18-105 for it's lighter weight, smaller size and longer range. Both solid choices though.
Nice! I really need to get one of these 18-135 to try. Are you shooting photography mostly or any video?
Dunna Did It I mostly use it walking for photos. Great at Sporting events (MLB baseball) when I need up close shots of family, zoomed in shots of players, and wide angle shots of the stadium
Nice! It’s supposed to be super sharp!
Well, it's not Sigma 16 f1.4 sharp. But for a zoom, it gets the job done.
Haha I totally hear you there!
I bought this lens 6 months ago. Compared to the kit lens, 20mm f2, 35mm f1.8 or even the 55-210, this lens took a little bit to get used to because of the extra size and weight. On a recent NYC trip, I debated whether to take this lens or the kit lens but at the end, I took the 18-105 with me and I am glad that I did. The extra reach and flexibility allowed me to get some great shots. The f4 performed okay when the sun went down so I typically switched to the 35mm f1.8. A major gripe for me was that the lens is so big that it would cast a shadow on my subject whenever I used flash. In several back lit situations, those shots were severely hampered by it. Aside from that, this is a great lens. Even though I don't shoot video, I appreciated the constant aperture and the non-extendable barrel. I haven't tried the 18-135 but if that has different trade-offs as well.
Thanks for sharing this! Love your points!
I was looking at getting the A6400 and foregoing the kit lens and get this for general photography and then some Sigma primes for video.
I have the 18-135mm for my Canon but the f/5.6 at the end kills me sometimes when it starts to get darker just after sunset.
Everything you just said(except the a6400, I have the 6500) is exactly what I have and I highly recommend it!!
You said 6000, 6300 and 6500 is it bad for 6400 ?
I already buy this after a long time using a kit lens and Zoom SEL 55-210. For me, that's a great investment right now
loving your videos man! very informative!
Thanks so much Jeck! I’m happy you find them helpful!
this is good review. all i want to ask is... what is the name that you use for place your camera on your backpack? thanks
I really wanted the Sony E 16-55mm 2.8 G for the amazing quality that it produces, it’s the price that is as you said, “arm and a leg.” I’m looking to have this as a versatile travel lense for travels, some landscape. Would you recommend this for landscape photography?
It would definitely be a great option for both landscape and for an all-around lens. Obviously pretty expensive but it’s a solid lens.
@@dunnadidit I meant to ask if the 18-105 would be a good choice/alternative. I've seen some vloggers use it for their travel, just wanted to see if it's good for landscapes as well. I also have a sigma 1.4 16mm as my secondary lense.
Just putting it out there, love the channel it's always the go to when I need some photography questions answered thanks for that!
I love the 18-105. I used it almost exclusively when travelling. F2.8 would be nice but not necessary outside most of the time.
Hi. I have a little loose sound that you can hear if you tilt the lens up and down, its like something is loose inside that makes a little sound... It is only like this when the camera is turned off. When its on there is no sound at all.. Could it be the OSS mecanism that is like this or is the lens might broken? It does work excellent in both movie and photos. Do you have the same thing on your lens?
I haven’t noticed anything like that on mine. Might be worth taking into your local camera shop.
@@dunnadidit Thanks! Yes i might do that
I basically hate the way everyone does every video review ever. But I like this one. You don't seem like a sell-out douche. And I can appreciate that.
Thanks Eric!!
It's the best lens for Sony APS-C when paired with a gimball and a6500 (see my chatuchak weekend market video). Zooming happens within the lens so you don't need to worry about the gimball not being balanced. The only downside is low light performance, so in evening I recommend you switch to 35mm f1.8
Yeah, in low light I end up on my 30mm f1.4 or 16mm f1.4 for sure!
Agree, I have had this lens for a couple years and it is my walk about lens. At f4 it is not a great event lens as auto focus will hunt in low light. If you have had this lens for a bit, there is a lens firmware update that seemed to me to improve it performance on the a6500 that I shoot with.
Great insight Eric! I totally agree!
Hey. Im still thinking about this lens, since i have the kit 16-50mm and a 50mm f1.8 and im still trying to find a good enough use for the 50-105 range. Also ive heard the lens isnt that sharp and on 18mm its so much more zoomed than 16mm kit. Still thinking about it and also ive seen the 55-210mm. What do you think is better and for what? Thank you a lot.
Great review! I have the a6000 and this lens is perfect for it. I also have a Sony FE 70-200 mm constant aperture 4.0 which translates out to 105-300 on an cropped sensor so I've got the complete focal range of 18 to 300 covered! For the money I think this lens is a great investment paired with the FE 70-200. It's all I need!
That sounds like a fantastic combo!!
Wow. Been watching your videos for nearly half a year now and stumbled across this one.
Your videos have really levelled up from 5 years ago. Well done! I notice the background noise in this video, and in comparison your most recent ones are silent.
Any advice on how you improved your sound from then until now?
Oh yeah it's massive! Even more on an apsc body.. But til i really love having 24 / 35 / 50 / 70 prime Lens quality in one Lens, i don't know what to get.. Of course for TH-cam talking stuff it's too much, but for client work for events / weddings it's an insane Lens to have i guess!
Absolutely!!
I was in a dilemma on whether to purchase this lens or some of the other options. The answer to all the questions that I had in my mind just poired in.
Great review!! Thanks for making such useful content ❤
For the Sony a6000 series I would happy with a faster version of the kit lens, say a 16-70 f2.8. I know there is the Zeiss 16-70 f4 but the reviews on that are very iffy plus it costs almost $1000. Surely someone can do better? (I'd even settle for a 16-50 or 16-55 f2.8). [edit] I should say that the small form factor is a big deal for me, which is my main objection to the 18-105. Plus I prefer wider at the low end than long reach.
I hear you 100%. I wouldn’t hold your breath though. I would even love to see a bit of a less expensive 16-35 f2.8. The only one is the master and it’s like $3000(CAD) and it’s a big lens! I’m going to be doing a comparison between the 16-70 and the 18-105 soon. The 16-70 is nice and small but I hear what you’re saying about the reviews. It’s not the sharpest lens for sure (still better than the kit lens though I suppose).
sony zies 16-70, rocks. Buy it on special or from a second hand exchange. I bought it on special (30% off xmas deal) I'm stoked with it... I also have the sony 90mmG so know that level of sharpness. The 16-70, being less sharp than the 90 et al (marginally), gives a slight softness that I like. I bought the 90 for portraits, and macro of course, but for portraits I'll often switch to the zies. So per the video, if I had only one choice I'd sell the gear for heroin.
Your wishes have been heard. There is the amazing 16-55 mm F2.8 G lens.
this is really helping, full of good advices, examples, and you answered to all my questions ! thanks man 😃
My pleasure! Thanks so much for watching!
This was my only one lens for 6 months with my A6500 and it was awesome worth for value considering this is a 2013 ish lens
Totally agreed! I rocked this one for quite some time! Literally 70% of my videos were filmed with this lens.
What do you use instead of it now?
Love your videos as per usual! But just wanted to know if this lens would be good for youtube video(mostly tutorials) i was looking into the 16 1.4 but totally open to others. What would you recommend?
It’s absolutely awesome for youtube videos, it might not be as necessary for tutorials if your camera will be on a tripod mostly. The great thing about this lens is the versatility of a zoom range. But for most of my TH-cam tutorials and talking videos, I use a prime lens like the sigma 30mm f1.4(most used) or the 16mm f1.4(second most used)
@@dunnadidit Awesome! thank you so much!!
My pleasure
I would say the sigma 16mm f1.4 for wide angle, and 18105 f4 for travel and videos. Definitely also the sigma 30mm f1.4 forming the "trio"~
You pretty much outlined my recommended lenses video haha 😂
Ace Mok Exactly my thoughts too. Only the 30mm f1.4 to go. Tempted by the 56mm f1.4 but certainly not in the near future.
Great review. Now I have a question. Compare to Sigma 17-50mm 2.8 OS which is the sharpest. Just want to know before buying. Thanks in advance!
Unfortunately I haven’t used the 17-50. As far as I’m aware, they don’t make it for Sony e mount so you’d have to use an adapter as well.
I have a 17-50 sigma and im looking to upgrade to rhis lens. It isnt the sharpest and i have to use manual focus because there is no e mount capability.
What did you film on during the talking head shots while holding the camera kit you’re talking about?
Sigma 30mm f1.4 😁 on of my favorites. I have a review on that too! th-cam.com/video/89NLu539MCU/w-d-xo.html
Thanks for the quick reply. Currently shooting with the GH5, though thinking about moving to Sony.
Side note, hate that TH-cam made me reload the video on mobile to see your reply. *shakes fists*
As much as I highly recommend moving to Sony 😉😉 I should mention that sigma makes an M4/3 Mount version of that 30mm as well and people seem to love it! But switch to Sony anyway haha.
And yeah I know what you mean about the reload thing. Then you spend 3 minutes trying to figure out where you were in the video so you can pick up.
Hi Dunna. Which do you think is better? This lens or the new 16-55mm f2.8? I would like to purchase only one zoom lens for my a6400 and I am considering the shaprness of the lens too.
16-55 is a better lens for sure, less reach and no OSS tho
Ive just bought a fs5 with this lens and you've just confirmed everything ...nice piece. thx
That’s awesome! Thanks for watching!
Great vid bud. Can you tell me why the 110 is 5x more expensive than the 105mm? Is it that much more superior?
When compared to kit lens how this lens perform in both wide & zoom (18mm & 50mm)?
My experience is that it’s better than the kit all around, but not a HUGE difference.
It's very good. Better than the kit lens.
Good presentation 👏 one question with app you using for editing which shown here 🤔 is it light room?
I've now binge watched 4 of your reviews, so now I feel comfortable asking my question. I'm brand new to photography beyond point/shoots and my phone. So new I haven't even bought the camera yet (Doing that on Friday). I had already decided that I was getting the 18-105 for my versatile lens, so this video just solidified that decision. Where I'm in purchase paralysis is, I was planning on buying the Sigma 30/1.4 or the 16/1.4 lens. I asked on a FB group what they thought and all I got was it depends on what I like to shoot. I don't have a camera yet... I don't know what I like to shoot. So, as a novice should I stay with only the 18-105, or to add on to your statement in this review, if you could only have TWO lenses, what would they be? Would the 30mm be redundant (except for the better low light performance)? Would the 16mm be a better choice for wide angle shots, again because of the low light performance, or is the 18mm of the 18-105 "good enough" for a beginner?
Ok... here’s two things...
1. If it was me - I would do the 18-105 and the 30mm f1.4.
2. Here’s what I suggest. Get your camera with the 18-105. And then go shoot a whoooolllleeee bunch! If you find yourself at the wide end at 18mm quite often after shooting a bunch, get the 16mm. If you find yourself zooming in a bit, maybe the 30mm. Find out what you are going to shoot most with the versatile lens. And then get a sharper, faster lens at that focal length!
Hope that helps!
@@dunnadidit why the 30mm over the 16mm? As far as shooting a bunch to see what I like, I was hoping to take this whole kit (and kaboodle) on my trip to the coast of Spain in a month. I'm kind of in a unique situation that won't allow me to even have my hands on the camera until I'm in Spain (I can DM you on IG if your want to know more).
Here's what I'm envisioning shooting most at least for this vacation: skyline from charter boat; various buildings; my wife in front of various scenery; my wife indoors; museum stuff indoors.
I know I could get away with the 18-105 for virtually all of that, but I worry about low light situations, especially in museums and restaurants.
@@dunnadidit oh, and thank you for answering so quickly.
I just find the 30mm more useful for what I shoot, but honestly it’s very close with the 16mm. Sounds like the 16mm might actually be better for what you’re looking for!
@@dunnadidit Thank you! I think I will go with the 16mm. From your reviews and everybody else on the Tube, 16mm just seems so much fun to shoot with. And it gives me something else to buy later! ("Honey, I need this 30mm! Dunna Said So!")
Hi Dunna, do you break 180 degree rule by making your shutterspeed higher than twice of its fps? like 120fps at 1/500 to get sharper footage? does slowing the footages down mask the juddery effect cause by high shutterspeed? thanks
Generally I try not to break the 180 rule but sometimes I do just for exposure but I don’t think it gives you “sharper” footage necessarily. I guess less motion blur could be considered sharper 🤷🏻♂️ . And no, slowing the footage down more wont mask it as far as I’m aware.
Will the 18-105mm remember the focal length when I turn off my camera and turn it on again?
I don’t think so.
No. You will though.
Thank you a loooot
So Which one is the best? 18-105 or 28-70
For videos and photos
Sigma 16mm! Because I shoot my dog and need to be up close and wide! Also clear optical zoom helps
Love that lens!!
Love this lens! Its taken so many nice photos at our recitals and events!!
It’s definitely my go to for that! Quick picture of the whole stage with the performer... zoom in, quick picture of them playing close up. BAM!
This 18-105 is definitely the lens I use most on my a6500. Hardly use my 35mm anymore. Shoot both video & still equally, so it makes sense for me. Just found your channel - nice to find someone with so much content I can relate too!
Great minds think alike I guess! Thanks for making your way over to the channel Debbie! Great to have you be part of the community!
Same, just sold my 35mm 1.8 and kept my sigmas 16mm & 30mm, but I want a zoom lens in its place.
Yeah I hear that, the closest thing I’ve found in that range is the Sigma 18-35 f1.8 which is amazing but you have to have an adapter and it makes it a bit less amazing
Dunna Did It confused as to which lens I want next. Unless, I can find a great deal for the fe70-200mm. Even thought about the 85mm f1.8. Hmm decisions.
Haha I totally hear you. I’m in the same position! I have the new Sigma 56mm on preorder though so I’m excited to try that out!
Great review - would you recommend this lens for a safari? Thanks
Well I’ve never been on a safari but I would assume maybe a 70-200 would be better?
Dunna Did It hey man okay great, thanks for the advice! 👍
No problem!
The only zoom lens i have for my 6300, completing my glass besides 35mm and fe 85
That’s a fantastic sounding kit!
Great review thank you. This is an APC lens?
No problem! Yes its an APS-C lens 😀
Sigma 18-35 + canon 50 1.8 stm + sigma mc-11 and 18-105 f4
Nice kit!
Great video! Would you recommend this lens for travel photography (landscape, portrait, etc,.)
Great review, i wish this lens was f2.2 i guess no one making any of these, if that was the case i would have choose this over sigma 30 & 16
Yeah me too! I have all three of those and they all serve their purpose for sure. It would be nice to see something with this range with a bit better aperture though... my 30 and 16 might collect some dust if that was the case haha
What? This lens is at most 15% better than a 16-50 kit lens. There is nothing about this lens I could call quality. While simga 30mm's sharpness at f2.8 can cut your eyes.
Dude!!! Cool video! I have a question: did you listen some sound in your 18-105 when it turns off? I mean, it's like OSS inside slightly moving... Thanks for review, dude!
You mean the little bit of sound inside the lens when you turn on and off the camera? That lens seems to “sweep” through the entire zoom range every time you turn it on, I always thought that was the noise.
Thanks for answer! Actually, I can listen some sort of tiny rattling sound inside my 18-105 when it not connected to camera. I fear it not good )
Yeah I don’t have that with mine for sure. Sounds like there might be something wrong with your lens😞
Do I need the adapter for this lens to use with a A7RII?
Nope! But you will have to use it in crop mode.
hi from india ,recently purchased Sony a6100 so wanted to know whether if i buy Sony 18-105 mm F4 lens ,so does the OSS works with a6100 because a6100 does not have in body stabiliser ,u've been using it, apart from constant aperture which is awesome,because i shoot railway videos so how would it be?.
And Your Reviews & Videos Are Awesome & Informative.
Dunna, is this lens the equivalent of the Canon 18-135mm?
Similar. Sony also has an 18-135 that’s newer and super sharp but has a changing aperture. I think that might be more similar.
@@dunnadidit do you think the Sony 18-135 is better than the Sony 18-105?
Dunna Did It I am also curious about this
@@dunnadidit Could you make a video about Sony 18-135?
it's just what i need🔥
I love your content, especially that you show a lot of examples
Greetings from Mexico🇲🇽
Dunna, great video. One lens...so tough. I thought my Zeiss 16-70 f4 would be my one and only but the f4....I'm really enjoying the Sigma 16mm f14 and just recently received the Sigma 30mm f14 for my birthday. I'm going to go out on limb here and say that if i had to choose one it would be the 30mm. I think the length is workable, i.e. if you want closer to the subject then move closer, and further, move further, also the f14 is beast mode! #instagramnotificationsquad get some!
WOOOOOOO! LOVE MY #INSTAGRAMNITIFICATIONSQUAD !!! Yeah the 30 is a close second for me for sure. That thing is a beast for sure. I really wanna try that 16-70 though!
Other than price is there any reason why I might wanna go with the 30 instead of 16? Been thinking about purchasing the 16 and im just hoping it’s the right decision lol
@@gioortiz8459 kinda depends on what you wanna do. Architecture and Landscape -> 16 mm | Portrait and stuff like that -> 30mm
Mine just arrived today! Thank you for the great review!
Nice! I hope you enjoy!!
I have this lens but the sigma 16mm F 1.4 is where it’s at
Love that lens too! I’ve been using it a lot lately since I started doing daily Instagram stories.
Really? Yea I love the wide shots included the Death of feel it gives
Lol “death of feel” sounds like a metal album.
Agree totally, i have not taken my sigma 16mm off my a6000 since buying it. Brilliant lens.
@@mikehunt5626 i love the sigma 16mm, own it as well, but for travel sometimes I wish that I could zoom into subjects... I'm really looking at getting this 24-105.
Love how much your channel has blown up man!
George!!! So good to see you in the comments section! Thank you so much dude! I really wanna see that incredible music bus of yours some day!
Dunna Did It really hope you can do !! I’ll have it in the states some day. Let me know if you’re ever in Europe and we’ll make it work!
Definitely! And let me know if you ever end up in Canada with it too 😁
Well I have rn canon 77d and 24-105mm 4L II usm and it's my "go to" I know that's bad that I have but it's budget and good
I don’t think that’s bad at all! Whatever gets the job done best and works within your budget is the PERFECT choice!
love your video man... 🥳🥳🥳
do you think its still good lens for aps c?
i am doing fashion photography and product appareal.
have a nice day
Looks like a good one.
It’s a banger for surrrrreeeeee!!! (Sorry, too much coffee)
Dunna Did I'd be that excited if I had one too, with or without coffee.
Haha so true 😉
A little late to the party but we all start from somewhere don't we? Lol. Great video. Very straightforward and very informative. Thank you. A quick question to all, I have slowly got into (Asian) wedding videography so was thinking if this would be good for events such as that? When I say good I do mean in terms of picture/video quality? I know it's not the sharpest out there but is it good enough? 18-105 would be perfect as it can adapt to most situation. To give a little more clarification into my circumstances, I have two cameras (for now) and my idea is to have one on a gimbal (beauty and devote shots), and one set up right in front of the stage (constant). I do have the sigma 16mm f1.4 and also the kit 16-55 and so looking to replace the kit lens. - Not 100% sure yet as to which lens will be on the gimbal and which one on the camera that'll just be facing the stage. Sorry for the long one guys but help a brother out lol
i loved it when you greeted those cyclists 😍😍😍 the way you said it
Hey Dunna, what do you think about Tamron 17-70 f2.8? Would it be a better choice over 18-105 f4, or kind of upgrade over 18-105? Will you review it and compare these two, when Tamron releases it's lens? I really like your videos and channel. Great work. 💪😎
Unfortunately I haven’t had the chance to try it yet but I think it would be a great choice! The only real downside is the lack of oss for people on apsc cameras other than the a6600