Just landed a preowned unit of this some months back and I actually prefers the steel bezel over the aluminium ones of the current model. It's really chunky but very well built. No regrets on this trigger and I am sure it will get significant wrist time in 2025 and beyond. Awesome review of this discontinued model Tim and Happy New Year! 🎉
@@davidr2802 DavidR goes to comment section of watch video, "reads comments on watch," is shocked. Uses pompous vocab to insult someone for "transcending their languidness." Good job :)
Just landed a preowned unit of this some months back and I actually prefers the steel bezel over the aluminium ones of the current model. It's really chunky but very well built. No regrets on this trigger and I am sure it will get significant wrist time in 2025 and beyond. Awesome review of this discontinued model Tim and Happy New Year! 🎉
Glad you're enjoying yours! Happy New Year!
--The 1916 Company Team
A 200m chronograph you can actually dive with, and it has a date function.
I actually prefer their pieces over Rolex but I’ve reached “critical Tudor/Rolex oversaturation” levels of apathy towards both brands.
yet still able to transcend your languidness to comment. We truly are blessed by your erudition.
🤣
@@davidr2802 DavidR goes to comment section of watch video, "reads comments on watch," is shocked. Uses pompous vocab to insult someone for "transcending their languidness." Good job :)
Never express a negative opinion of Tudors or Rolexes. You're going to hit cause really deep seated emotional trauma in some people.
@@adadadatt your bumptious presumption of my watch proclivities is banal in its extremity.
Thic with 5x C's
I’m not sure it’s fat enough. 😅
The B01 is a 12-hour chrono, not 30 min lol
Well, no one’s gonna mistake it for a Daytona.
Yea if I wanted a chunky chrono, I’ll stick to the Navitimer. I just don’t get Tudor
Most Tudors are pretty awful but this one takes the cake.