12th marks helps you in your successful life journey 😢 please reply me i want to become a youtuber but i have boards 🙄😭 also when you open your school 😊
Actually you can do both.. Yes you're young and energetic if you use your time wisely you can make it very easily. It just required the willingness to do 😊.
कल ही महाराणा प्रताप सिंह जी की जयंती थी, उनका और उनके वंश का मध्ययुगी काल में 1000 वर्षो से भी ज्यादा काल तक जो योगदान रहा है वो सराहनीय है, आप को डॉ. ओमेन्द्र सिंह रतनु के साथ एक 2 घंटे का पॉडकास्ट जरूर करना चाहिए, या फिर महाराणा लक्ष्यराज सिंह मेवाड जी के साथ, मुझे यकीन है की महाराणा जी, या डॉक्टर जी अपना कीमती समय निकाल के आपको पॉडकास्ट करने का अवसर प्रदान करेंगे।
This is one of the best of ramayana and Mahabharata I have ever come across. I had a lot of questions which somehow makes sense now. I understand now how mature is hinduism. More power to you sir and thanks again raj for bringing this to us.
What i like is he shows the complexity of humans, bcoz so many common people don't understand if we say our problems, they always want to fit into boxes like he said "right wrong, black white" but our lives always be in gray area but that doesn't mean justify the bad acts, that's why history is so important to know, our god's also did somethings what we can do is we should see the patterns and not repeat in our lives, i really love the podcast❤
Thank you so much Raj for having Sir Anand, to be honest it was such good podcast to hear the justification reason for each character who deemed to be seen evil. My father used to always say what Ravana or Duroyodhan did was never to be seen as bad because they did what they were supposed to do. And Anand sir's interview was the best.
What an eye opening conversation! Anand Neelakantan has given such a nuanced and beautifully mature outlook on our ancient mythology.. He took it from a fairy tale to a human journey..
I feel is that Rama sent away a pregnant Sita away to the jungle. However Sidhhartha himself went away from the luxury of palace life. That's where the difference lies, that's why Rama is criticized and Siddhartha is not.
That's becoz ram made sita to leave the country whereas Siddhartha made his own choice coz he wanted to find the truth and serve the humanity..here you can't compare Ramayana and Buddhism
BOTH are wrong. But true, Rama is more wrong. Rama failed in Raja dharma, Pati Dharma, PitruDharma Raja Dharma: Praja also needs Rani, queen. If Praja sees their own Rani PUNISHED for NO fault of hers, what standards does it set for women in society? King is supposed to do justice. If he can't do justice in Queen's case, he cannot do justice to anyone. Rama killed so many in Lanka to give Sita her honour & rights back. But he couldn't protect his own wife in his OWN Country A King is not supposed to be PEOPLE PLEASER. A king is supposed to do the right thing. A king is the Supreme Court. The court cannot be swayed by mass sentiments of men. Raja dharma is to educate society if needed & use your charm & likeability to set a standard that even after agnipariksha, people have NO right to judge Sita. Buddha FAILED in pati dharma, pitru dharma too. He brought a kid into this world & abandoned him. He abandoned his wife. But atleast, left them in kingdom. But for his own selfish desire to get enlightenment, he left in grihashtya ashram, which is time period for family. Hinduism did allow everyone sanyaas AFTER family life period was done as the last self actualization time
@@dOVERanalystrama didn't send sita to forest he send her to Valmiki ashram. In original version Rama's brothers used to keep visiting her in ashram. He sends her there because he knows that sages will question her in ashram and also his kids will receive education from Valmiki. He made sure about safety of sita. If he wouldn't have done all this then instead of criticising ram you yourself would have been questioning sita. Basically he took the blame on himself but cleaned the character of sita.
Buddha was not criticize bcz he is famous in foreign...and indian communist never want to criticize budha bcz ambedkar join Buddha dharma...and read ami gantara where she brings truth about valmiki ram
It's really a fantastic episode. Till date, I was watching the reels of Figuring Out but not the total episode. Now I understood how interesting the total episode is and I would definitely try to watch the total episodes. Thanks for the Video! Hope all the subscribers you have, will watch the content and gain many many insights.
Excellent podcast!!! The guest is extremely knowledgeable and provided sharp logic and a very interesting perspective! Absolutely loved watching this episode from start to finish!
1) He is not doing good work by portraiting bad side of any sanatani culture. 2) The base of this podcast ..Who will decide what is right or wrong has a simple answer ""DHARMA"" dharm will decide what is right. 3) how beautifully he manages to brainwash somebody who has not gone through scriptures.( Adding mis info to real truth.)
It left me wanting to ask deeper questions to this theory. He says Ram did what is right for Praja, but did he? Isn't he setting the wrong example and making things worse for all women?! Waise toh majoritarian theory sahi nahi hota, 80% log dowry lete toh kya woh bhi, Maryada ban jata, in spite of the unneccessary hurtful nature? It's more like people-pleasing. His second story about the king who comes from a place of ego when trying to be perfect by helping the bird applies to Ram too. Our Praja is like this because of those examples. Victim shaming and punishing. It's baffling that this thought does not cross the minds of people who explain this. Also, they say Ram was in love with Sita and knew she was innocent, yet chose an inauthentic path whereas Gautham Budha wouldn't do justice, even if he stayed put in his place as a husband and father because his soul was aching and restless for enlightenment. He does come back to his wife and children which is totally misrepresented here. I agree with a lot of other things he says and the larger context about Dharma and Adharma not being black and white and thought it was insightful.
Sita is just Ram's wife but also Queen/mother of the kingdom, if people are not accepting that position, it is only right to distance her from that position. She was his wife and mother of his children even though she was not queen.
Amazing thoughts shared on this podcast! It has been very rightly said that your perspective changes your reality. All the best Raj for your future endeavors... ❤
1) He is not doing good work by portraiting bad side of any sanatani culture. 2) The base of this podcast ..Who will decide what is right or wrong has a simple answer ""DHARMA"" dharm will decide what is right. 3) how beautifully he manages to brainwash somebody who has not gone through scriptures.( Adding mis info to real truth.)
I never missed to watch your podcast, And genuinely liked it & learned so many things, but this podcast is the best one till now. I just loved it because it makes you think before you act. Thanks for doing this podcast.
1) He is not doing good work by portraiting bad side of any sanatani culture. 2) The base of this podcast ..Who will decide what is right or wrong has a simple answer ""DHARMA"" dharm will decide what is right. 3) how beautifully he manages to brainwash somebody who has not gone through scriptures.( Adding mis info to real truth.)
Dear bro, this is really amazing, actually your all podcast are like a university of business with practical knowledge which cannot be find Acuretly in normal mba books. 🧡💛💚💙💜 talking about all other business podcast, please keep it up and thank you
I don't know why... But Mr Anand gave me that Ruskin Bond vibes... My childhood was filled with Ruskin Bond novels and stories and I don't know why but his storytelling is very smooth, natural, intuitive and engaging.... Just like Ruskin Bond....
It was a nice conversation. Worthy information for food for thoughts. I don't have any background on Ramayana & Mahabharata except through TV serial. Enjoyed the explaination by the author.
Amazing episode 🔥🔥 i like the part when sir says that there is no such thing as only black and white means gray is also important. Love these kind of point of view 🔥🔥
Buddha is not a re-incarnation of anyone. He was just a common man who lived extra-ordinarily. Ram cannot be compared with Buddha, Buddha is simply greater. Also, unlike Ram, Buddha was real, not a myth.
From this episode I'm taking back with me "six and nine both exist" it's just the matter from where you are viewing ❤. "Tu galat nai hai Naina bas bas mujhse bht alag hai😅" YJHD. Again thank you Raj for this beautiful podcast.😊
1) He is not doing good work by portraiting bad side of any sanatani culture. 2) The base of this podcast ..Who will decide what is right or wrong has a simple answer ""DHARMA"" dharm will decide what is right. 3) how beautifully he manages to brainwash somebody who has not gone through scriptures.( Adding mis info to real truth.) Please
@@timetraveler9492he is just telling his prospective, you have to pay for your karma, no matter what so Krishna also pay for his past life karma as rama, duroyodhan paid for his bad Karma, kunti paid for her karma. Karma is action and consequences no matter who did it you have to pay for it.
Abandoning of Sita Maa comes under “ uttara Ramayana “ which is not written by valmiki . There is no proof for this . Scholars need to debate on this .
Any book is a exaggerated version of fundamental realities. So, we are to read after qualifying. Duality is when we take a side. That's our daily life. How can we know non dual, the unified version? Only way is to get into "No conflict zone". Arjuna did that. Then He imaged what's the largest experience he wants. To get that, he need knowledge and act with it. That's Bhakti, Jnana & Karma. These are fundamental realities / methods. Use trinity to come out of duality to become Unity. Make one out of two using three or four (dharma to moksha). Universe reversed - Verse in to Uni. So understand from a non reactive/ conflict state as to Who you want to be. Like Arjuna, we must be qualified. Or we hear Gita from Sanjaya (Servant, the sleep) who told to unconscious Blind king or brain. Flash back reactive understanding. Arjuna had Active understanding. So qualified Act from a unbiased person leads to Reality as he wanted. Rest are just colors added to Enjoy the experience.
I do not agree about the seeta agnipariksha. If ram was such a learned individual, he had the option to share his knowledge and reason with the people. Another aspect of being a king is also to show the right way to your praja when they are going wrong. By greenlighting the agnipariksha, he might have encouraged that practice in the society and yes we see the repurcurtions even today when women are subjected to prove their characters time and again. Had he reasoned with his praja, he would have set an example of equality and mutual respect in marriage. If u simply have to surrender to people's whims, then what is the use of the knowledge that was gained with rushi munis? Also, even if the act was done for pleasing people, how can this decision be taken single handedly by one person when there are two individuals in a relationship? This again helps prove the theory that a woman does not have her opinion and she belongs to the man she is married to and he is entitled to take any decisions on her behalf.
Look morality was different back then, as a husband he was wrong but as a King he protected the honor of his kingdom and his people which was his duty. This is very complicated.
@@punyashloka4946 if morality was different back then, then why is lord ram praised and worshipped in today's times for ALL HIS DECISIONS? The fact is, that all religions, all folklores, mythology etc are written by powerful and learned MEN. Hence, they have potrayed women as secondary or something that comes after the duties and responsibilites of a "Man". Man is considered human whereas a woman is something that is other than human. Something beneath him.
@@DecodingTarot you people are morons of the highest order, Lord Rama is worshipped because of many good qualities he has , a good son, a good king who protect the honor of his kingdom, a great warrior, a loving brother, someone who sticks with his ethic and morale etc. You cannot just pin point his bad qualities and completely ignore his good qualities, you have to look into his whole character. He is someone who is a hero of any time. As for religion, evolution played a part in how religion evolved, any agricultural society is going to be patriarchal in nature it nobody's fault so obviously religion also evolved with that circumstance. Its a natural outcome of how society evolved overtime so stop whinning and crying about all the time. Ramayana is also a good story and literature which should be appreciated.
@@DecodingTarot You have clearly not read Ramayana and talking nonsense 🙄 here. Rama respected his father words and goes to Vanvasa. Both Kaekayei and manthara was women who plotted against Rama. I'd Ram wanted he would have punished them but he still give Kaekayei her place and did not harm her. Same with Surpnakha she attacked Sita and tried to kill her and then it was her who provoked Ravana to abducted sita which led to the war. But Rama never said that women are evil 😈 or witches or anything like that. He go to vanvaas to protect the respect of his father, he goes to war with Ravana to protect his abducted wife and then as a king he leaves sita to protect the honor of his kingdom. He followed dharma all his life. He was a great man. He lost so much but never complains . He full fill his duty as a King , as a son, as a husband, as a brother etc. When you live in a society sometimes you have to respect the tradition of that society. Rama did which he think was right and appropriate. You may not agree with him on everything but he was a good man with good moral values and there is lot that we can learn from him. Rama never said that women is underneath man or anything like that.
Impressed, Every one have their own perspectives That was not depending on right or wrong , That I was trust and remember Every time I was taking a decision
Raj....I like ur podcast s...I wish u to grow soon nd kindly do something aisa ki Boht grow kro.....nd aap k podcast se aur log bhi grow ho sake........ All d best 💖
Great episode but poor interviewing. There's no flow or structure in the questions, thankfully Mr.Anand carried the interview with his insights and knowledge
Raj please call Shri Aditya Satsangiji on your show. He is an Indian American entrepreneur and Dharmis author. He also runs an amazing TH-cam channel called ' Sattalogy' that debunks mythology related to our Shastras. I came to know from his channel that currently he is on a India tour. Thanks
Politics, business, entrepreneurship, sport's, history, health, religious teachings, moral stories.........to run a society/country we need all kinds of different paths.
1.The base of this podcast ..Who will decide what is right or wrong has a simple answer ""DHARMA"" dharm will decide what is right. 2. how beautifully he manages to brainwash somebody who has not gone through scriptures.( Adding mis info to real truth.)
He is telling ashwathamah hatah kunjaraha And this dude is showing Krishna and balaram killing kuvalayapeeda A min of research atleast mr host😅 And this guest doesn't know difference between jyest and kanist which is level 0 in samskrutham and he is analysing Sanskrit classicals like ramayan and Mahabharata Just by connecting some dots doesn't make anyone expert in anything Now all sheeps come and call me right wing extremist 😂
Abrahamic religions have split the Bharatiya (especially north) mind in two, when we are a dialectic, trialetic, quadratic (and so on and so forth) thinking people. That is why so many of our devas have many heads.
Half knowledge is harmful for society. Conveniently excluding parts that don't support his narrative. If you want to start about karma, then it should start with gatekeepers of vishnu, asuras, etc. avatars, yugas n mindset of people.
Bhai, this is not his book. This is podcast of 50 minutes, which is having n numbers of topics to give a general idea of his statement. If you want to have complete picture of his narrative then read his book. And if you do not find that book as complete as you want, then critique him that he is excluding parts
Firstly this guy explaining with a point of view that our epics is mythology is completely wrong. They are itihasas (thus it happened) they are historical factual epics. Coming to many a thing stated some are right, some are way off, since again he thinks it is mythology. The aspect that arjun killing the nagas and buliding a palace (indraprastha). He did not kill snakes just like that, under the instruction of krishna he did, also krishna never made a decision which is adharmic. Before burning the forest, he calls takshak nag, and tells him to clear the forest along with other snakes as they are unsafe and garud is hunting for them. So he says go to an alternate place and then the burning of the forest happens. If people dont know reasons they should read the original text and get to know the details. One thing to clarify both epics have all logical explanations for the current "scientific" mindset that will satisy. One more thing in the previous yugas, they were much more scientific, much more logical and definitely much more human. I can also give explanations of sita agnipareeksha. But right now i am leaving it here. Lets not make maa Sita a feminist and attribute such qualities, also Rama loved Sita way much more, so lets not come to conclusions without knowing the background events. Also Maa Sita never complained or thought Lord Rama betrayed or did any anayaya to her. I dont think we should either.
I'm a proud Hindu but its still unfair to Sita and also all the women in the kingdom bcs the example being set is that if your wife is being kidnapped by another man she should be abandoned for infidelity. This chapter of Sita being abandoned by Ram is not a part of Valmiki's Ramayan, its a subsequent addition made to the epic. In any case it's not acceptable.
@@shezz2511 but don't you think that he is setting a bad example for upcoming generation, during Bangladesh war most of the womens were raped but after the war got ended they were accepted by their fellow partners and this is what I call a true dharma
@@nivethaj8295 it's not the bad example.. thinking for the sake for a population who is your first priority and your responsibility...it should be your top priority...for an example imagine your pm technically he is the king of the country and he is always with his wife...do what his wife says and into her 24/7...and your economy going down , prices of essential item are high...your family you all are suffering...the country is suffering.. and you read daily in news that your king doesn't give a fuck about you and your country..he is enjoying with his family? What would be your reaction? Would you consider him a good king? No! That's the rajdharma...your first priority has to be your people..then your family ..to work with his (pm)country and people..he has to sacrifice the family time! Isn't it?to achieve one thing you have yo sacrifice one thing...that's the law of the life.
@@shezz2511 till now you didn't get my point..your talking about distraction..but here this man is setting bad example for his people and the future generation..okay rama abandon his wife for the sake of country's welfare what if his people started doing the same thing in case if their partner got lost in the woods or got kidnapped by a random person and returned back..dont you think it is Adharma..
We need more people like Anand Neelakantan to counter the likes of Ami Ganatra who is trying to Abrahamise Hindus by insisting on only one version of our scriptures
🎧 Listen to Figuring Out Episode with Anand Neelakantan On Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/4LdfmAoUm4L0uT0n6saUuY?si=aa8c692fa68a45de
12th marks helps you in your successful life journey 😢 please reply me i want to become a youtuber but i have boards 🙄😭 also when you open your school 😊
Actually you can do both.. Yes you're young and energetic if you use your time wisely you can make it very easily. It just required the willingness to do 😊.
@@MuskanSharma_24 but how? I have lot of study school tution self study etc.
कल ही महाराणा प्रताप सिंह जी की जयंती थी, उनका और उनके वंश का मध्ययुगी काल में 1000 वर्षो से भी ज्यादा काल तक जो योगदान रहा है वो सराहनीय है, आप को डॉ. ओमेन्द्र सिंह रतनु के साथ एक 2 घंटे का पॉडकास्ट जरूर करना चाहिए, या फिर महाराणा लक्ष्यराज सिंह मेवाड जी के साथ, मुझे यकीन है की महाराणा जी, या डॉक्टर जी अपना कीमती समय निकाल के आपको पॉडकास्ट करने का अवसर प्रदान करेंगे।
@@Nitiinsharma ok
He doesn't interrupt the speaker, unlike T R S Ranveer, he listens patiently😊
also the bad head nod of TRS
Neither does this guy make faces while listening to the guest as if he is sitting through serious heartburn.
All the analysis are exactly to the point
That's the reason why i comeback to Raj's podcasts. TRS always asks the spirituality question which disturbs the whole flow of the conversation.
Ranvir is arrogant and pretends to know everything 😅@@Anisha_Jaiswal
This is one of the best of ramayana and Mahabharata I have ever come across. I had a lot of questions which somehow makes sense now. I understand now how mature is hinduism. More power to you sir and thanks again raj for bringing this to us.
ExMuslim Shahil , Zafar Heretic 🔥🔥
Wow.. please bring him in your podcast again.. i am very sure that people would love to listen to him again :)
What i like is he shows the complexity of humans, bcoz so many common people don't understand if we say our problems, they always want to fit into boxes like he said "right wrong, black white" but our lives always be in gray area but that doesn't mean justify the bad acts, that's why history is so important to know, our god's also did somethings what we can do is we should see the patterns and not repeat in our lives, i really love the podcast❤
ExMuslim Shahil , Zafar Heretic 🔥🔥
Thank you so much Raj for having Sir Anand, to be honest it was such good podcast to hear the justification reason for each character who deemed to be seen evil. My father used to always say what Ravana or Duroyodhan did was never to be seen as bad because they did what they were supposed to do. And Anand sir's interview was the best.
What an eye opening conversation! Anand Neelakantan has given such a nuanced and beautifully mature outlook on our ancient mythology.. He took it from a fairy tale to a human journey..
Call it history and not mythology.
@@chandaniberry9369many poets have used creative liberty bro , so the original one is only history
@@agnigamer8111 What?
@@agnigamer8111 so that's their story, derivative of the original.
No single rigid textbook.
ExMuslim Shahil , Zafar Heretic 🔥🔥
It was a good show! Anand sir explains Darshan and the importance of context brilliantly.. 🙏🏼
ExMuslim Shahil , Zafar Heretic 🔥🔥
I feel is that Rama sent away a pregnant Sita away to the jungle. However Sidhhartha himself went away from the luxury of palace life. That's where the difference lies, that's why Rama is criticized and Siddhartha is not.
That's becoz ram made sita to leave the country whereas Siddhartha made his own choice coz he wanted to find the truth and serve the humanity..here you can't compare Ramayana and Buddhism
BOTH are wrong. But true, Rama is more wrong.
Rama failed in Raja dharma, Pati Dharma, PitruDharma
Raja Dharma: Praja also needs Rani, queen. If Praja sees their own Rani PUNISHED for NO fault of hers, what standards does it set for women in society?
King is supposed to do justice. If he can't do justice in Queen's case, he cannot do justice to anyone.
Rama killed so many in Lanka to give Sita her honour & rights back. But he couldn't protect his own wife in his OWN Country
A King is not supposed to be PEOPLE PLEASER. A king is supposed to do the right thing.
A king is the Supreme Court. The court cannot be swayed by mass sentiments of men.
Raja dharma is to educate society if needed & use your charm & likeability to set a standard that even after agnipariksha, people have NO right to judge Sita.
Buddha FAILED in pati dharma, pitru dharma too.
He brought a kid into this world & abandoned him.
He abandoned his wife.
But atleast, left them in kingdom.
But for his own selfish desire to get enlightenment, he left in grihashtya ashram, which is time period for family.
Hinduism did allow everyone sanyaas AFTER family life period was done as the last self actualization time
@@dOVERanalystrama didn't send sita to forest he send her to Valmiki ashram. In original version Rama's brothers used to keep visiting her in ashram. He sends her there because he knows that sages will question her in ashram and also his kids will receive education from Valmiki. He made sure about safety of sita. If he wouldn't have done all this then instead of criticising ram you yourself would have been questioning sita. Basically he took the blame on himself but cleaned the character of sita.
@@dOVERanalystsages will not question her
Buddha was not criticize bcz he is famous in foreign...and indian communist never want to criticize budha bcz ambedkar join Buddha dharma...and read ami gantara where she brings truth about valmiki ram
It's really a fantastic episode. Till date, I was watching the reels of Figuring Out but not the total episode. Now I understood how interesting the total episode is and I would definitely try to watch the total episodes.
Thanks for the Video!
Hope all the subscribers you have, will watch the content and gain many many insights.
Excellent podcast!!! The guest is extremely knowledgeable and provided sharp logic and a very interesting perspective! Absolutely loved watching this episode from start to finish!
1) He is not doing good work by portraiting bad side of any sanatani culture.
2) The base of this podcast ..Who will decide what is right or wrong has a simple answer ""DHARMA"" dharm will decide what is right.
3) how beautifully he manages to brainwash somebody who has not gone through scriptures.( Adding mis info to real truth.)
It left me wanting to ask deeper questions to this theory.
He says Ram did what is right for Praja, but did he? Isn't he setting the wrong example and making things worse for all women?! Waise toh majoritarian theory sahi nahi hota, 80% log dowry lete toh kya woh bhi, Maryada ban jata, in spite of the unneccessary hurtful nature? It's more like people-pleasing. His second story about the king who comes from a place of ego when trying to be perfect by helping the bird applies to Ram too. Our Praja is like this because of those examples. Victim shaming and punishing. It's baffling that this thought does not cross the minds of people who explain this.
Also, they say Ram was in love with Sita and knew she was innocent, yet chose an inauthentic path whereas Gautham Budha wouldn't do justice, even if he stayed put in his place as a husband and father because his soul was aching and restless for enlightenment. He does come back to his wife and children which is totally misrepresented here. I agree with a lot of other things he says and the larger context about Dharma and Adharma not being black and white and thought it was insightful.
Your 100% right..thats the reason I hate rama and whole Ramayana story..
Sita is just Ram's wife but also Queen/mother of the kingdom, if people are not accepting that position, it is only right to distance her from that position. She was his wife and mother of his children even though she was not queen.
@@nivethaj8295and love who? Mohammed and Jesus?
@@Raut-warrior I love siva and Parvati..coz siva is the only god who treats his wife equally..
@@Raut-warrior LOL
Amazing thoughts shared on this podcast! It has been very rightly said that your perspective changes your reality. All the best Raj for your future endeavors... ❤
1) He is not doing good work by portraiting bad side of any sanatani culture.
2) The base of this podcast ..Who will decide what is right or wrong has a simple answer ""DHARMA"" dharm will decide what is right.
3) how beautifully he manages to brainwash somebody who has not gone through scriptures.( Adding mis info to real truth.)
He explained many many questions I had regarding all the stories.... Really impressed
I never missed to watch your podcast,
And genuinely liked it & learned so many things, but this podcast is the best one till now.
I just loved it because it makes you think before you act.
Thanks for doing this podcast.
1) He is not doing good work by portraiting bad side of any sanatani culture.
2) The base of this podcast ..Who will decide what is right or wrong has a simple answer ""DHARMA"" dharm will decide what is right.
3) how beautifully he manages to brainwash somebody who has not gone through scriptures.( Adding mis info to real truth.)
ExMuslim Shahil , Zafar Heretic 🔥🔥
this is not just perspective but its hidden wisdom which needs to be explored more and more ....
Dear bro, this is really amazing, actually your all podcast are like a university of business with practical knowledge which cannot be find Acuretly in normal mba books. 🧡💛💚💙💜 talking about all other business podcast, please keep it up and thank you
Hats Off Anand Sir this episode brought me whole new perspective of looking into things...
I don't know why... But Mr Anand gave me that Ruskin Bond vibes...
My childhood was filled with Ruskin Bond novels and stories and I don't know why but his storytelling is very smooth, natural, intuitive and engaging.... Just like Ruskin Bond....
Wow..... I am blown away..... 🤯
Such an amazing way of thinking... ❤️😊
Keep it up... 👍
It was a nice conversation. Worthy information for food for thoughts. I don't have any background on Ramayana & Mahabharata except through TV serial. Enjoyed the explaination by the author.
Very interesting and very knowledgeable podcast. Opens entire new way of thinking and looking.
It's really amazing bring such more diverse personalities for different perspectives
Excellent episode Raj. Thankyou for this one.
How 48 mins ran away,I didn't have a clue.Came across many new things.❤❤❤❤
Your podcast always provokes different ways of thinking, enjoed it, thanks
Ok this is a new prespective on Ramayana and Mahabharata, good to watch.
Very nice episode... would like to hear more from him..a humble request..
Raj I loved it!! Want more like this.
Very insightful. Very nice
That's how a real researcher♥️
The way you explained Dharma is 🔥❤
Fascinating ❤
Super explanation….beautiful view point
Amazing episode 🔥🔥 i like the part when sir says that there is no such thing as only black and white means gray is also important. Love these kind of point of view 🔥🔥
ExMuslim Shahil , Zafar Heretic 🔥🔥
Amazing insight into how 'Karm' of characters of ramayana and Mahabharata are connected and opposite
I want a series of videos with this man .......plz plz pz plz 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Extremely insightful conversation
Please make series with him and other scholars regarding “sattyug” in sequence!
Please bring Anand sir back again for a longer podcast
Buddha is not a re-incarnation of anyone. He was just a common man who lived extra-ordinarily. Ram cannot be compared with Buddha, Buddha is simply greater. Also, unlike Ram, Buddha was real, not a myth.
From this episode I'm taking back with me "six and nine both exist" it's just the matter from where you are viewing ❤.
"Tu galat nai hai Naina bas bas mujhse bht alag hai😅" YJHD.
Again thank you Raj for this beautiful podcast.😊
1) He is not doing good work by portraiting bad side of any sanatani culture.
2) The base of this podcast ..Who will decide what is right or wrong has a simple answer ""DHARMA"" dharm will decide what is right.
3) how beautifully he manages to brainwash somebody who has not gone through scriptures.( Adding mis info to real truth.)
Please
ExMuslim Shahil , Zafar Heretic 🔥🔥
@@timetraveler9492he is just telling his prospective, you have to pay for your karma, no matter what so Krishna also pay for his past life karma as rama, duroyodhan paid for his bad Karma, kunti paid for her karma. Karma is action and consequences no matter who did it you have to pay for it.
Mind blowing ❤
Raj, read The Palace of Illusion which is Draupudis verison of Mahabharata ...it is a spectacular read from a woman's perspective .
Never read something from women perspective. They are always wrong. 99% of women can't be objective/neutral in their view.
Its just mediocre storytelling
@@amyra8159disagree
Bakwaas karna aur draupadi ki love story kya bakwaas h
Viewers can see the importance of darshan in the first few minutes of his explaining with basic examples
Thank you for this masterpiece learned so much 😇🙏
ExMuslim Shahil , Zafar Heretic 🔥🔥
So beautifully presented.
ExMuslim Shahil , Zafar Heretic 🔥🔥
Loved this!!! ❤
Very enlightening
Amazing part is “ It’s a matter of CHOICE. “
Abandoning of Sita Maa comes under “ uttara Ramayana “ which is not written by valmiki . There is no proof for this . Scholars need to debate on this .
Plzz more spritual and defence podcasts..
Any book is a exaggerated version of fundamental realities. So, we are to read after qualifying. Duality is when we take a side. That's our daily life. How can we know non dual, the unified version? Only way is to get into "No conflict zone". Arjuna did that. Then He imaged what's the largest experience he wants. To get that, he need knowledge and act with it. That's Bhakti, Jnana & Karma. These are fundamental realities / methods. Use trinity to come out of duality to become Unity. Make one out of two using three or four (dharma to moksha). Universe reversed - Verse in to Uni. So understand from a non reactive/ conflict state as to Who you want to be. Like Arjuna, we must be qualified. Or we hear Gita from Sanjaya (Servant, the sleep) who told to unconscious Blind king or brain. Flash back reactive understanding. Arjuna had Active understanding. So qualified Act from a unbiased person leads to Reality as he wanted. Rest are just colors added to Enjoy the experience.
I do not agree about the seeta agnipariksha. If ram was such a learned individual, he had the option to share his knowledge and reason with the people. Another aspect of being a king is also to show the right way to your praja when they are going wrong. By greenlighting the agnipariksha, he might have encouraged that practice in the society and yes we see the repurcurtions even today when women are subjected to prove their characters time and again. Had he reasoned with his praja, he would have set an example of equality and mutual respect in marriage. If u simply have to surrender to people's whims, then what is the use of the knowledge that was gained with rushi munis? Also, even if the act was done for pleasing people, how can this decision be taken single handedly by one person when there are two individuals in a relationship? This again helps prove the theory that a woman does not have her opinion and she belongs to the man she is married to and he is entitled to take any decisions on her behalf.
Look morality was different back then, as a husband he was wrong but as a King he protected the honor of his kingdom and his people which was his duty. This is very complicated.
@@punyashloka4946 if morality was different back then, then why is lord ram praised and worshipped in today's times for ALL HIS DECISIONS? The fact is, that all religions, all folklores, mythology etc are written by powerful and learned MEN. Hence, they have potrayed women as secondary or something that comes after the duties and responsibilites of a "Man". Man is considered human whereas a woman is something that is other than human. Something beneath him.
@@DecodingTarot you people are morons of the highest order, Lord Rama is worshipped because of many good qualities he has , a good son, a good king who protect the honor of his kingdom, a great warrior, a loving brother, someone who sticks with his ethic and morale etc. You cannot just pin point his bad qualities and completely ignore his good qualities, you have to look into his whole character. He is someone who is a hero of any time. As for religion, evolution played a part in how religion evolved, any agricultural society is going to be patriarchal in nature it nobody's fault so obviously religion also evolved with that circumstance. Its a natural outcome of how society evolved overtime so stop whinning and crying about all the time. Ramayana is also a good story and literature which should be appreciated.
Tu na man 😂 bhag
@@DecodingTarot You have clearly not read Ramayana and talking nonsense 🙄 here. Rama respected his father words and goes to Vanvasa. Both Kaekayei and manthara was women who plotted against Rama. I'd Ram wanted he would have punished them but he still give Kaekayei her place and did not harm her. Same with Surpnakha she attacked Sita and tried to kill her and then it was her who provoked Ravana to abducted sita which led to the war. But Rama never said that women are evil 😈 or witches or anything like that. He go to vanvaas to protect the respect of his father, he goes to war with Ravana to protect his abducted wife and then as a king he leaves sita to protect the honor of his kingdom. He followed dharma all his life. He was a great man. He lost so much but never complains . He full fill his duty as a King , as a son, as a husband, as a brother etc. When you live in a society sometimes you have to respect the tradition of that society. Rama did which he think was right and appropriate. You may not agree with him on everything but he was a good man with good moral values and there is lot that we can learn from him. Rama never said that women is underneath man or anything like that.
I want more episodes with the anand sir damm good
love your podcast with sharks
Impressed,
Every one have their own perspectives
That was not depending on right or wrong ,
That I was trust and remember Every time I was taking a decision
The best podcast ever🔥😊
Supper super love it
Raj....I like ur podcast s...I wish u to grow soon nd kindly do something aisa ki Boht grow kro.....nd aap k podcast se aur log bhi grow ho sake........ All d best 💖
Superbbb ❤👌👌👌👌🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
first podcast of yours, i found very interestinf
Please please please bring him again. It’s a humble request
So whatever I do I'm doing wrong to some other party and going to face the consequences of it, more confusing 😅
The concept of different perspective and right and wrong that just opened my mind
Wowwww thank you so much😊
ExMuslim Shahil , Zafar Heretic 🔥🔥
Mind blowing 😊
Great episode but poor interviewing. There's no flow or structure in the questions, thankfully Mr.Anand carried the interview with his insights and knowledge
Great podcast . I am ready for your experiments.
I loved it 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
ExMuslim Shahil , Zafar Heretic 🔥🔥
Too good this podcast 👏 Thank you very much 😊, keep doing such kind of podcast
🤯🤯🤯🤯no words...
Anand bhai true lobe❤
Raj please call Shri Aditya Satsangiji on your show. He is an Indian American entrepreneur and Dharmis author. He also runs an amazing TH-cam channel called ' Sattalogy' that debunks mythology related to our Shastras. I came to know from his channel that currently he is on a India tour. Thanks
Request to get anand sir back on the podcast.
THANK YOUU
Quality content
This was brilliant
ExMuslim Shahil , Zafar Heretic 🔥🔥
Raj bhai thoda jaldi podcast aana chahiye yr aapka bhut wait karna pdta h
Bhai what is this ? One of the best podcast..
Best ever 👍👍👍👍👍👍👌👌👌👌👌👌👌❣❣❣❣❣❣❣❣❣❣❣🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
Amazing writer
Bro make another channel for these podcasts. Keep it exclusively for enterpreneurship.
Politics, business, entrepreneurship, sport's, history, health, religious teachings, moral stories.........to run a society/country we need all kinds of different paths.
1.The base of this podcast ..Who will decide what is right or wrong has a simple answer ""DHARMA"" dharm will decide what is right.
2. how beautifully he manages to brainwash somebody who has not gone through scriptures.( Adding mis info to real truth.)
He is telling ashwathamah hatah kunjaraha
And this dude is showing Krishna and balaram killing kuvalayapeeda
A min of research atleast mr host😅
And this guest doesn't know difference between jyest and kanist which is level 0 in samskrutham and he is analysing Sanskrit classicals like ramayan and Mahabharata
Just by connecting some dots doesn't make anyone expert in anything
Now all sheeps come and call me right wing extremist 😂
Abrahamic religions have split the Bharatiya (especially north) mind in two, when we are a dialectic, trialetic, quadratic (and so on and so forth) thinking people. That is why so many of our devas have many heads.
Raj bro spirituality par we want more podcasts bruhh plss
In 10 mins watched 3 ads 😢😢
No skip ad also....
Raj something do about it
Half knowledge is harmful for society. Conveniently excluding parts that don't support his narrative. If you want to start about karma, then it should start with gatekeepers of vishnu, asuras, etc. avatars, yugas n mindset of people.
Bhai, this is not his book.
This is podcast of 50 minutes, which is having n numbers of topics to give a general idea of his statement.
If you want to have complete picture of his narrative then read his book. And if you do not find that book as complete as you want, then critique him that he is excluding parts
All those imaginary stories don't count ! 😅
The tone is not to the taste of Hindi speaking persons but he has greater command over words. Must be further superior in English. Thanks.
Firstly this guy explaining with a point of view that our epics is mythology is completely wrong. They are itihasas (thus it happened) they are historical factual epics.
Coming to many a thing stated some are right, some are way off, since again he thinks it is mythology. The aspect that arjun killing the nagas and buliding a palace (indraprastha). He did not kill snakes just like that, under the instruction of krishna he did, also krishna never made a decision which is adharmic.
Before burning the forest, he calls takshak nag, and tells him to clear the forest along with other snakes as they are unsafe and garud is hunting for them.
So he says go to an alternate place and then the burning of the forest happens. If people dont know reasons they should read the original text and get to know the details.
One thing to clarify both epics have all logical explanations for the current "scientific" mindset that will satisy.
One more thing in the previous yugas, they were much more scientific, much more logical and definitely much more human.
I can also give explanations of sita agnipareeksha. But right now i am leaving it here. Lets not make maa Sita a feminist and attribute such qualities, also Rama loved Sita way much more, so lets not come to conclusions without knowing the background events.
Also Maa Sita never complained or thought Lord Rama betrayed or did any anayaya to her. I dont think we should either.
Nice
I'm a proud Hindu but its still unfair to Sita and also all the women in the kingdom bcs the example being set is that if your wife is being kidnapped by another man she should be abandoned for infidelity. This chapter of Sita being abandoned by Ram is not a part of Valmiki's Ramayan, its a subsequent addition made to the epic. In any case it's not acceptable.
Rajdharma is always supirior than pati dhama...a king is the father to his praja first...
@@shezz2511Rajdharma doesn't mean doing justice by mob. This is why they used to have royal courts to decide what's just and what isn't.
@@shezz2511 but don't you think that he is setting a bad example for upcoming generation, during Bangladesh war most of the womens were raped but after the war got ended they were accepted by their fellow partners and this is what I call a true dharma
@@nivethaj8295 it's not the bad example.. thinking for the sake for a population who is your first priority and your responsibility...it should be your top priority...for an example imagine your pm technically he is the king of the country and he is always with his wife...do what his wife says and into her 24/7...and your economy going down , prices of essential item are high...your family you all are suffering...the country is suffering.. and you read daily in news that your king doesn't give a fuck about you and your country..he is enjoying with his family? What would be your reaction? Would you consider him a good king? No! That's the rajdharma...your first priority has to be your people..then your family ..to work with his (pm)country and people..he has to sacrifice the family time! Isn't it?to achieve one thing you have yo sacrifice one thing...that's the law of the life.
@@shezz2511 till now you didn't get my point..your talking about distraction..but here this man is setting bad example for his people and the future generation..okay rama abandon his wife for the sake of country's welfare what if his people started doing the same thing in case if their partner got lost in the woods or got kidnapped by a random person and returned back..dont you think it is Adharma..
It’s not mythological story … it’s just historical stories
41:10 what nonsense, it is not 16k wives, nobody knowledgeable takes it literally
Can you please tell us more?
Like from where did you get your knowledge about krishna not having 16k wives?
We need more people like Anand Neelakantan to counter the likes of Ami Ganatra who is trying to Abrahamise Hindus by insisting on only one version of our scriptures
First time watching your channel :) a request if you can kindly use indian history and not mythology when refering to our scriptures 🙏
Uttar Ramayan was not written by Valmiki Rishi. Its not part of original Ramayana.
Literally my first full podcast 😅😂
Jai siyaram ❤❤jI shree krishna ❤❤