I am returning mine after 5 days of use ! this camera is definitely not for flash photography/ studio ! first of all shutter speed goes at max at 16000 shutter speed at multiple mode shoot only. 80000 shutter speed is only in single mode shoot! color shits are all along those variable speeds you need to sync flash manually in order to shoot with variable shutter speed,and it's time consuming, and i suspect that its still not accurate and it might be the reason for power color shits strength light intensity inaccuracy .Another issue is the noise and Aperture change at values like f8 noise is so big and noticeable that it makes picture not usable bottom line its a real downer on photography side but videography is definitely a big high
Well after a few days of testing and feedbacks, I think most photographers would agree that in some ways this is an effort to move technology forward. And at the same time that it's really only a camera for photographers of super fast actions, i.e. fast sports, fast dancing, etc.
I have the A1 as well trust me it does better with studio fast moving subject cause it’s accurate on all accounts at Shutter speeds of 10000 no sweat I personally think that this camera does well without flash ! The inaccuracy of sync flash with intensity of light shifts is just unacceptable and if you change aperture while strobe are on you will need to tweak back manually the flash speed sorry but it’s really not usable for flash photography right now maybe in the future they will find a solution . As I say it’s ground breaking for videographers but not for photography unless you use the camera without flash then is great for some .
@@yohannsphotographyvideogra9542 One can certainly agree with that. By the way, I have an A1 too and I certainly wouldn't change it. On the other hand, the A9III was definitely not designed for landscape photographers like me. Unless the Aurora Borealis went crazy and started dancing so fast that 30 fps,. what the A1 has, wouldn't be enough :D
I noticed if you set the white balance on flash it gives accurate coloration to the image at the different shutter speeds. It seems to work well with studio and outdoor flash photography. I'm going to play around with it a little more, but it takes some time getting used to it.
It is a specialized camera for a very narrow group of photographers. I believe it is a game-changer for them. For the rest of us, it is an interesting device that we have no way to utilize.
While I was out photographing today a helicopter flew overhead and I shot with my Sony A1 interested to see if I would see any rolling shutter. At least for me there was no apparent rolling shutter and I was completely satisfied with the results. I would rather have the extra megapixel of the A1 than global shutter as a wildlife photographer.
Thanks, it is important that real users talk about cameras. Keep it up
thanks a lot!
Excellent thank you
Thank you, you're welcome.
Very useful. Thanks 👍
thanks a lot
Great 👍
thanks a lot!
You can download all the raw files discussed in the video here: drive.google.com/drive/folders/1hs5Lmw_Kd8NsI0eLgyA6bguzHsRItRUA?usp=share_link
👍🏻
I am returning mine after 5 days of use ! this camera is definitely not for flash photography/ studio ! first of all shutter speed goes at max at 16000 shutter speed at multiple mode shoot only. 80000 shutter speed is only in single mode shoot! color shits are all along those variable speeds you need to sync flash manually in order to shoot with variable shutter speed,and it's time consuming, and i suspect that its still not accurate and it might be the reason for power color shits strength light intensity inaccuracy .Another issue is the noise and Aperture change at values like f8 noise is so big and noticeable that it makes picture not usable bottom line its a real downer on photography side but videography is definitely a big high
Well after a few days of testing and feedbacks, I think most photographers would agree that in some ways this is an effort to move technology forward. And at the same time that it's really only a camera for photographers of super fast actions, i.e. fast sports, fast dancing, etc.
I have the A1 as well trust me it does better with studio fast moving subject cause it’s accurate on all accounts at Shutter speeds of 10000 no sweat I personally think that this camera does well without flash ! The inaccuracy of sync flash with intensity of light shifts is just unacceptable and if you change aperture while strobe are on you will need to tweak back manually the flash speed sorry but it’s really not usable for flash photography right now maybe in the future they will find a solution . As I say it’s ground breaking for videographers but not for photography unless you use the camera without flash then is great for some .
@@yohannsphotographyvideogra9542 One can certainly agree with that. By the way, I have an A1 too and I certainly wouldn't change it. On the other hand, the A9III was definitely not designed for landscape photographers like me. Unless the Aurora Borealis went crazy and started dancing so fast that 30 fps,. what the A1 has, wouldn't be enough :D
I noticed if you set the white balance on flash it gives accurate coloration to the image at the different shutter speeds. It seems to work well with studio and outdoor flash photography. I'm going to play around with it a little more, but it takes some time getting used to it.
its no "game changer" for me!
Well it's not a game changer for a lot of photographers 😊
@@jansmidphotography Maybe not even most!!
It is a specialized camera for a very narrow group of photographers. I believe it is a game-changer for them. For the rest of us, it is an interesting device that we have no way to utilize.
While I was out photographing today a helicopter flew overhead and I shot with my Sony A1 interested to see if I would see any rolling shutter. At least for me there was no apparent rolling shutter and I was completely satisfied with the results. I would rather have the extra megapixel of the A1 than global shutter as a wildlife photographer.