Always glad to see another MultEQ-X video from you, Carl! I've been using MEQ-X for a while now and I didn't realize one could measure each speaker individually like you showed. I think I may try this out while keeping the microphone tip perpendicular to each speaker. I have a feeling I may be able to get much better response on my center this way since my center is positioned similar to yours and with the mic pointed at the ceiling it is definitely not at 90 degrees to the speaker. Hopefully I can test that out tomorrow.
Hi there. Great video ! 👍 I agree with you on the fact that MultEQ-X is definitely a must have for people who like tweaking. Here is my question : According to your experience, Audyssey is not very good with positive gain EQ filters. Is there a threshold from where it starts compromizing sound quality ? For exemple, would a +3dB EQ keep sound integrity ?
Not sure by how much, but I think going above +6 is where its starts to sound a little stretched. So I never boost above +6. I have a spreadsheet that can cut things in half.
Great video, I do similar workflow with REW to create my own EQ and then use MultEQ-X to import. Why your surrounds were shown about 3 to 5 dB, perhaps DEQ was accidentally enabled?
Nice. Yeah, I'm looking to do another calibration soon, and really go hard with it. First import and max resolution 96, and find out where it goes to 3hz apart, which I think is around 250hz. Then export another text file at 48 and keep getting as much resolution out of the text files as possible. It will take time, but I'm willing to do it. I'm also thinking about having a slightly different music calibration vs movie. So, there's lots to do, LOL. Thanks Dagrk.
MultEQ-X Dynamic EQ Future Improvements Wishlist 1 : Ability to set a custom Dynamic EQ operating range... 20Hz - 80Hz 20Hz - 120Hz 20Hz - 250Hz 20Hz - 500Hz Dynamic EQ won't make any adjustments above these respective cut-off points. 2 : Ability to disable Dynamic EQ volume boosting of surround channels... Automatic Surround Volume Adjustment | OFF Automatic Surround Volume Adjustment | ON 3 : Ability to have more granular control of the Dynamic EQ offset... -1dB -2dB -3dB -4dB -5dB -6dB -7dB -8dB -9dB -10dB -11dB -12dB -13dB -14dB -15dB Instead of just -5dB -10dB -15dB Really enjoy the videos, very informative; keep up the good work! 👍
@@hdmoviesource Very much appreciated! It's a great feature, so much potential, it just needs some tweaks to make it useful for a wider range of content, the rules it was designed around don't really exist any more, it's the wild west now 😅 Quick question, would you be interested in making a video on the accuracy of the ACM1HB Audyssey Mic using OCA's ACM1HB_90deg_calibration file in REW vs your UMIK-2? Obviously the UMIK-2 is a better mic but would be interesting to see how far off the Audyssey Mic is using OCA's Mic Calibration file, from what I understand there are variances in all Microphones. Thanks
@@UnfinishedBusinessInGaming Could be a good idea to compare mics. yeah. Not sure how much time I have, but I'll think about it. This app has great potential for sure, just gotta make some needed tweaks to get the most out of it.
@@hdmoviesource Thanks, you're the only one on TH-cam I can find doing these "What If" videos, I'm very like-minded, I really enjoy experimenting and seeing what's possible! I have not purchased MultEQ-X yet, but I plan to within the next month. I've already created a new hotmail email address using non-personal info, so I can bundle in the licence if I ever do sell my current AVR to recoup some of the cost and reinvest in the app.
Hello Carl, don´t get me wrong but do you control the mic from the denon, with messuring with the umik 2 ? Uncalibrated to calibrated.... maybe the umik 2 has a more accurate look on 10k and above. Like your videos 😊
For the Denon it's using the Audyssey mic, and when I measure from the PC I use the UMIK 2. I use a calibration file for the UMIK. I definitely think the UMIK is more accurate Michael.
@@Yakena1 yeah. If you like to tinker and experiment I think MQX is the best. If you want to let the room correction software do it all, I believe Dirac will be the best choice.
Hiya. Dirac user here. Be very careful if you are a Umik and Mac owner. Dirac is now NOT compatible using the Umik and Mac. Do a search and you’ll see. The mini dsp forum is full of disgruntled owners and have had very poor support.
Always glad to see another MultEQ-X video from you, Carl! I've been using MEQ-X for a while now and I didn't realize one could measure each speaker individually like you showed. I think I may try this out while keeping the microphone tip perpendicular to each speaker. I have a feeling I may be able to get much better response on my center this way since my center is positioned similar to yours and with the mic pointed at the ceiling it is definitely not at 90 degrees to the speaker. Hopefully I can test that out tomorrow.
Always glad to see you again on TH-cam with another great video Carl ❤
Greetings from Austria 🇦🇹
Thank you, Dan, I really appreciate it, thanks for stopping by.
Great explanation, thank for taking the time to explain everything, it's starting to all make sense now.
Thank you!
Multeq-x is an absolute gem if you are into fine tuning. I would not own a Denon/Marantz receiver without including this.
Yeah Its great Christian.
Nice avr upgrade buddy 😮😮😮
I love it, Im very happy.
Another great video 👌💯👍😇
Thank you! Cheers!
Hi there. Great video ! 👍 I agree with you on the fact that MultEQ-X is definitely a must have for people who like tweaking. Here is my question : According to your experience, Audyssey is not very good with positive gain EQ filters. Is there a threshold from where it starts compromizing sound quality ? For exemple, would a +3dB EQ keep sound integrity ?
Not sure by how much, but I think going above +6 is where its starts to sound a little stretched. So I never boost above +6. I have a spreadsheet that can cut things in half.
Thanks Carl. Hope you’re well mate?
Hey Cheekster. Doing well thank you.
Great video, I do similar workflow with REW to create my own EQ and then use MultEQ-X to import. Why your surrounds were shown about 3 to 5 dB, perhaps DEQ was accidentally enabled?
That was my initial thought too, but if DEQ was enabled there would have actually been a noticeable house curve on the bass
Nice. Yeah, I'm looking to do another calibration soon, and really go hard with it. First import and max resolution 96, and find out where it goes to 3hz apart, which I think is around 250hz. Then export another text file at 48 and keep getting as much resolution out of the text files as possible. It will take time, but I'm willing to do it. I'm also thinking about having a slightly different music calibration vs movie. So, there's lots to do, LOL. Thanks Dagrk.
MultEQ-X Dynamic EQ Future Improvements Wishlist
1 : Ability to set a custom Dynamic EQ operating range...
20Hz - 80Hz
20Hz - 120Hz
20Hz - 250Hz
20Hz - 500Hz
Dynamic EQ won't make any adjustments above these respective cut-off points.
2 : Ability to disable Dynamic EQ volume boosting of surround channels...
Automatic Surround Volume Adjustment | OFF
Automatic Surround Volume Adjustment | ON
3 : Ability to have more granular control of the Dynamic EQ offset...
-1dB -2dB -3dB -4dB -5dB -6dB -7dB -8dB -9dB -10dB -11dB -12dB -13dB -14dB -15dB
Instead of just -5dB -10dB -15dB
Really enjoy the videos, very informative; keep up the good work! 👍
Ill contact Audyssey and suggest this. Might be quite complicated, but it's a great idea. I'd love to see it.
@@hdmoviesource Very much appreciated! It's a great feature, so much potential, it just needs some tweaks to make it useful for a wider range of content, the rules
it was designed around don't really exist any more, it's the wild west now 😅 Quick question, would you be interested in making a video on the accuracy of the ACM1HB Audyssey Mic using OCA's ACM1HB_90deg_calibration file in REW vs your UMIK-2? Obviously the UMIK-2 is a better mic but would be interesting to see how far off the Audyssey Mic is using OCA's Mic Calibration file, from what I understand there are variances in all Microphones. Thanks
@@UnfinishedBusinessInGaming Could be a good idea to compare mics. yeah. Not sure how much time I have, but I'll think about it. This app has great potential for sure, just gotta make some needed tweaks to get the most out of it.
@@hdmoviesource Thanks, you're the only one on TH-cam I can find doing these "What If" videos, I'm very like-minded, I really enjoy experimenting and seeing what's possible! I have not purchased MultEQ-X yet, but I plan to within the next month. I've already created a new hotmail email address using non-personal info, so I can bundle in the licence if I ever do sell my current AVR to recoup some of the cost and reinvest in the app.
If you get a new receiver, you need a new license, unfortunately. Thanks for the kind words.
Hello Carl,
don´t get me wrong but do you control the mic from the denon, with messuring with the umik 2 ?
Uncalibrated to calibrated....
maybe the umik 2 has a more accurate look on 10k and above.
Like your videos 😊
For the Denon it's using the Audyssey mic, and when I measure from the PC I use the UMIK 2. I use a calibration file for the UMIK. I definitely think the UMIK is more accurate Michael.
What level should the speakers be set at?
around 75 to 80db. I typically choose 75db, but been testing 80db. I use headphones to protect my ears, just incase it's too loud.
I wonder if going to the more expensive Dirac Live would save time in the long run?
It' possible, but if Dirac can't give somebody like me all this control, I'm not sure. Can you calibrate individual channels?
@@hdmoviesource Just asking as well. It is a big cost either way, and I want to make the best choice.
@@Yakena1 yeah. If you like to tinker and experiment I think MQX is the best. If you want to let the room correction software do it all, I believe Dirac will be the best choice.
Hiya.
Dirac user here. Be very careful if you are a Umik and Mac owner. Dirac is now NOT compatible using the Umik and Mac. Do a search and you’ll see. The mini dsp forum is full of disgruntled owners and have had very poor support.
I'll check it out, thanks Jim.