Nice video! Although I can't help but notice you compared RDR2 main game vs GTA Online. Graphics are a little better detailed in the GTA V main game. However, I'm super pumped for GTA VI 🥳🥳🥳
Yeah I think it may vary somewhere but that will be a very sight change and also that can't beat RDR2 in terms of environment one game is there #GOT which can give neck to neck competition to RDR2 which I goona upload 🔜:)
@@Rishi__7020 As if I didn't know that already? I'm saying that realism is pointless in games because when I play a game, I'm not looking to be reminded of reality, when I could just walk outside and experience it myself. When I play a game, I'm looking to escape from reality for a bit. I really don't get this obsession with realism within the gaming community.
@@Zayne1013 I think the community’s obsession isn’t so much with realism as it is with details. It’s beyond the point to compare GTA V and RDR 2 purely through a realism lens because they’re different games offring different experiences. In GTA V, unflipping a car with the press of a button or getting thrown from a moving vehicle multiple times a day isn’t really realistic is it? But it works. On the other hand, RDR 2 has more serious tone and, sure, might not have the arcade aspect, but the sheer amount of detail in RDR 2 stands out, and that’s what Rockstar excels at. And thats why we are excited for GTA 6. Whether these details perfectly mirror reality isn’t really the point for me.
@@welderlourenco3426 That's your perspective of it and I do partially agree with you. However, the community is quite literally obsessed with genuine realism in games. That's why people go completely nuts when games like BeamNG Drive or Teardown make an appearance. Graphics-wise they aren't realistic, but realistic levels of destruction are present. And then there's games like Farming Simulator, which is mimicking something I can very simply walk outside and do for real if I really wanted to, but I don't want to. The point being, games need to stop trying to so hard to be fancy with cutting-edge graphics or however the phrase goes. My main problem with realism in games, whether it be graphics or what can be destroyed or whatever else, is that not everyone can access it, because it needs an insane computer system to even run, which not everyone can afford. I apologize if I am being rude in any way, but I'm getting very frustrated by how so many people beg for realism in games, when realism in games is entirely pointless.
@@Zayne1013you can’t live in the Wild West in real life. Realism when it comes to past Time events makes the game better for alot of people, if rdr2 and it’s realism didn’t take you out of the world you’re living in now idk what to tell you bro, but you got a fucked up sense of reality if you think we can live anything like the time frame that rdr2 is in
Nice video! Although I can't help but notice you compared RDR2 main game vs GTA Online. Graphics are a little better detailed in the GTA V main game. However, I'm super pumped for GTA VI 🥳🥳🥳
Yeah I think it may vary somewhere but that will be a very sight change and also that can't beat RDR2 in terms of environment one game is there #GOT which can give neck to neck competition to RDR2 which I goona upload 🔜:)
ATOMIC BOMB VS COUGHING BABY!!!
😂
Both ot them Nice still after decade.
Agree 💯
Yes, but why does it matter? Realism is pointless in games.
I think with realism most of the gamers connect these games with the real world
@@Rishi__7020 As if I didn't know that already? I'm saying that realism is pointless in games because when I play a game, I'm not looking to be reminded of reality, when I could just walk outside and experience it myself. When I play a game, I'm looking to escape from reality for a bit. I really don't get this obsession with realism within the gaming community.
@@Zayne1013 I think the community’s obsession isn’t so much with realism as it is with details. It’s beyond the point to compare GTA V and RDR 2 purely through a realism lens because they’re different games offring different experiences. In GTA V, unflipping a car with the press of a button or getting thrown from a moving vehicle multiple times a day isn’t really realistic is it? But it works. On the other hand, RDR 2 has more serious tone and, sure, might not have the arcade aspect, but the sheer amount of detail in RDR 2 stands out, and that’s what Rockstar excels at. And thats why we are excited for GTA 6. Whether these details perfectly mirror reality isn’t really the point for me.
@@welderlourenco3426 That's your perspective of it and I do partially agree with you. However, the community is quite literally obsessed with genuine realism in games. That's why people go completely nuts when games like BeamNG Drive or Teardown make an appearance. Graphics-wise they aren't realistic, but realistic levels of destruction are present. And then there's games like Farming Simulator, which is mimicking something I can very simply walk outside and do for real if I really wanted to, but I don't want to. The point being, games need to stop trying to so hard to be fancy with cutting-edge graphics or however the phrase goes. My main problem with realism in games, whether it be graphics or what can be destroyed or whatever else, is that not everyone can access it, because it needs an insane computer system to even run, which not everyone can afford. I apologize if I am being rude in any way, but I'm getting very frustrated by how so many people beg for realism in games, when realism in games is entirely pointless.
@@Zayne1013you can’t live in the Wild West in real life. Realism when it comes to past Time events makes the game better for alot of people, if rdr2 and it’s realism didn’t take you out of the world you’re living in now idk what to tell you bro, but you got a fucked up sense of reality if you think we can live anything like the time frame that rdr2 is in