CALL RECORDING is LEGAL or ILLEGAL in India ? Call Recording Laws in India | StudyIQ
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024
- In this video, we explore the legality of recording phone calls in India. Gain a comprehensive understanding of call recording laws and regulations, ensuring that you are informed about your rights and responsibilities when it comes to call recording.
For all Judicial Services Exams visit here
bit.ly/Judicia...
Judiciary (Pre + Mains)
bit.ly/Judicia...
StudyIQ Judicial Services Course covers
-Videos of all the Major and Minor laws, Local Laws
- Weekly Live Doubt cum Mentorship Sessions
-Current Affairs Videos by Dr. Gaurav Garg,
-Judgement Writing Classes, Essay Writing and Answer Writing Classes and many more Sessions
-Test Series for Prelims
-Subject wise PYQ Paper Sets for all State Judicial Services.
Judicial Service Examinations of 15 States Covered- Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Haryana, Punjab, Delhi, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand, West Bengal, Orissa, Jharkhand , Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh
For all Judicial Services Exams visit here
bit.ly/Judicia...
Download the App to Subscribe to the Course
bit.ly/studyiqApp
For any doubt, Call : 080-6897-3353
Click here for Whatsapp Chat
wa.me/919554443351
INDEPENDENCE DAY SALE is Live on StudyIQ Judiciary
🏆 Ace Your Judiciary Journey with our Unique UDAAN Batch
Batch Link- www.studyiq.com/course-detail/udaan-judiciary-live-foundation-batch
💥To Know More About Batch Watch- th-cam.com/users/livekn1glBMVLQ0?feature=share
● 1 Yr Extra Live Classes Validity
● 7 Days Fees Refund Policy
Enroll now in Independence Day Sale and get the Batch in just 25,999 by using your Favorite Educators Code
Hurry up! Sale is Live till 15th Aug
For any queries please call us on - 080-4980-1290
CCTV is also illegal 😂 right to privacy
😛
That's why you must display " you are under CCTV Surveillance". or " CCTV in Operation" than you are covered by Law
@@sunilahuja108only thieves and dacoits will not like
@@sunilahuja108😂dhruv rathee km dekha kr.
CC tv lagte lagte kitna yug bit jayega tub Tak kitna curruption badh jayega
In India judges don't follow laws, they follow their mood.
They follows their aka's command
Yes absolutely right
घूस लेते सरकारी कर्मचारियों की vedio उनकी बिना permission बनाना भी privacy का उल्लंघन है l😂
Mere hisab se public servent job apni seat pe hota hai, to waha kuch bhi private nhi hota, wo public ki seva ke liye baitha hai waha
@@Amit01649ye to wahi baat ho gyi aap dusre ke Ghar me ghus ke uske upar hi right to privacy ka aligation laga dete ho kyuki uske Ghar me cctv laga hai 😂😂😂
Strange that you can win a case by producing false witnesses but not by producing genuine phone call recording 🤔
Victim:- I am recording your call.
Criminal:- Ok I support you, please collect evidence.
😂
😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂
😂
😂😂😂😂😂
मतलब अब अपने बचाव के लिए आदमी avidence भी नहीं जुटा सकता 😂😂😂😂
कल के दिन ऐसा भी होगा कि criminal से परमिशन लेनी होगी की तेरे खिलाफ सबूत जुटाएं या नहीं! और वो कहेगा नहीं और केस वापस।।
Hum sub currupted se parmission lena padega ab o permission dega ki nahi usko faisla court karegi
😢
Sahi baat hain 😂
Bilkul sahi kaha aapne ❤❤❤
Now these days
Koi us judge ko phone pe gaali de phir dekho😂
😂😂😂😂
@@Know24x7 😅
😂😂😂😂
Kya laya bhai kaha se sochate ho aap
@@Traget100days Jaise ko taisa🤣
सच्चाई को सामने लाने के लिए कोई भी तरीका,गैरकानूनी नहीं होना चाहिए।
bilkul sahi bhai
King you drop something precious called leather belt 🙈
It means that you can commit crime privately under privacy clause and if you record it without his consent, it will be not admissible by court. What a judgement!!!!!!
आजकल जजो मे न्याय लेने की बुद्धि नही रही।ये तो common sense की बात है सबूत चाहिए तो बिना बताए रेकॉर्डिंग करनी पड़ेगी। बता देने के बाद तो सामने वाला सावधान जो जाएगा।इतनी सी भी कॉमन सेंस नही रही जजो में
Agar rahta to Aisa faisla karta
Exactly
Fir Tarik par tarikh kaise paregi
U all right
Saaf paani ke machhar hai ye dengue, Jo paida achhe mahol me hote hai lekin jyada Jaan leva hote hai. Inhi mahagyaaniyo ne adultery ko bhi crime nahi hai mana hai.
Ye jyada crime badhana chahte hai.
1 person ka Right to Justice le lo...dusre person ko right to privacy de do.... bohot badhiya 👏👏👏Well done Judiciary 😑
Court ke judges aajkl nasha karke faisala dete hai adultry wife ki call recording bnda evidence ki rup mai na de to kya de evidence mai usse bda evidence kya ho skta hai
नशा तो नशा बल्कि सस्ता नाश करके करते हैं फैसला अब देखी निठारी कांड के आरोपियो को बरी कर दिया
Right
Nation does not have any confidence on collegium judges. They have charged fine on lokesh gurjar, just bcoz he spoke truth about judiciary.
Some judge are not capable they are only depends on law. They can't use logic and common sense.
Sahi kaha apne
U r right... High court judgement is wrong... The husband should move to supreme court.
supreme court will also agree with the high court judgement becuz sc also says husband has to give maintenance to wife who is having adultery
In that case, court me CCTV CAMERA install karna aur sare court hearing ko record karna without clients concent is also violating the right to privacy
court is a public place
That's why you must display " you are under CCTV Surveillance". or " CCTV in Operation" than you are covered by Law
@@sunilahuja108then what if we do same
जजों को लोग मानते हैं की बहुत बुद्धिमान हैं लेकिन फैसले बेवकूफों जैसे होते हैं कोई आपको जान की धमकी देता उससे परमिशन लेंगे? पत्नी पति को छोड़ दूसरे के साथ सुहाग रात मनाये तो अपराध नहीं?
Husband: i m recording our call
Wife: ok I will speak the truth😂
About Monica?
Epic sir
Very good decision. If someone is giving life threatening on call, asking for bribe etc. then the victim will politely ask to the other person 'Sir, since you're doing unlawful against me, Im going to record the phone call and produce it in court, please start threatening me.'
इंडिया में जज भी मेरी तरह कम पढ़े लिखे हैं इनकी कानून के हिसाब से कम से कम 2 साल की ट्रेनिंग होनी चाहिए हर एक जज अपने मर्जी के हिसाब से फैसला देता है चाहे मैं फैसला अच्छा हो चाहे बुरा हो🙏🙏
Aur 1 time khana Dena chahiye
Ye Jo CCTV se chor ko pakadte ho, wo b toh chor ki privacy ka violation hai. India k courts Kothe se Kam nhi
प्रश्न है 1.लव मैरिज या 2.अरेंज मैरिज
उपाय= no marriage
प्रॉब्लम सॉल्व
Decision of Court by judges are not surprising when rapists lynchers murderers are acquitted declaring sanskari.
It should be allowed, victim person must have a right to collect evidence whether it is legal or illegal. We should not inform a criminal before recording an audio,video and any other evidence.
Yes you are right.
Indian laws are funny these days. Ok from now on everyone will inform a criminal that he is recording his criminal deeds so that he can produce that in court...and criminal will happily give permission..because of such kind of laws, innocent people will struggle to proove thier point...
It is like thief says production of cctv footage is violation of right of privacy under article 21 ...😂 .. So calling call recording is illegal doesn't make any sense ...
well said
Court paradox....
That's why you must display " you are under CCTV Surveillance". or " CCTV in Operation" than you are covered by Law
@@sunilahuja108 are u defending court's decision against the husband? If so, then u are a jaroo ke gulam
@@sunilahuja108😂tu paida hote chaman tha ya course Kiya tha?
On the day of Suhagraat:
Husband: I am going to deflower you.
Wife: No, you can't. It is cruelty under divorce act.
Husband: I will definitely do it because it is not rape under CrPC. 😅😂😂😂
ऐसे मे CCTV कैमरा भी गैर कानूनी हैं😂😂😂😂😂
Right
Correct 😂
Exam me CCTV nahi rakhna chahiye 😂
RTP मै भी कुछ प्रावधान की जरूरत है.
Valid point man😅😂
In my opinion, the Parliament as well as the Judiciary should work together to clarify such ticklish issues by passing amendments to the applicable laws in a very crisp manner so as not to leave any loopholes for any interpretations. Such efforts would go a long way in reducing the pendency of cases in the Courts where on similar grounds, people across different Courts in different States of India have to unnecessarily spend their valuable time, money and energy!
I would really appreciate it if you make a special video on how to make a certificate under Sec. 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act to assist people to draft one with all the essential requirements. Thank you ma'am.
Call recording legal होना चाहिए अपने phone से recording करने पर, chhattisgarh high court का बकवास डिसीजन ।
देश में बिना permission के फोटो खीचकर उसे पोर्न साइट्स तक पे अपलोड कर देते है असामाजिक तत्व। और। आप लोग कॉल रिकॉर्डिंग की बात करते हो।
Are yaar...Galat decision/Judgment de do pr call recording mtt suno ?......Waah re Judiciary waah😑....... Honest hote huye bhi banda case haar jaaye usko justice na mile Wo chalega...pr kisi ki privacy violate nhi honi chahiye wo bhi call conversation jaisi....Waah👏👏👏
This call recording settings were set up to prevent ourselves from false allegations. So, this must be allowed. It might violate the right to privacy in a way of illegal but, way of fighting against fake allegations. Thank you ma'am for such an informative video.
If someone threatens me and I produce call recordings, then such a judge will clearly charge me under that call recording case 😂😂😂
Pehle kanoon andha tha
Ab chutiya ban gaya hai
True
Agreed
Enko dar hai ke kahi inki koi recording na kar le.... Ye public benefit ka law nhi hai... Ye VIP logo ko protection Dene wala Law hai
जजो को अब ज्यादा पढ़ाई करने की जरूरत है एक तरफा फैसला गलत है,यही तो अन्याय है।
Wife is like an open book for her husband so that husband can record call,make videos and should be admitted in court also bcoz there is no privacy between husband wife. also recording may be an important evidence of the case so it should be accepted by court and may be listen by the judge in presence of only husband and wife in his chamber.
Inshort, बिना परमिशन के किसी अपराध का सबूत इखट्टा करना अपराध है।
लगता है जज की वाइफ ने उसकी कॉल रिकॉर्ड कर दी थी इसीलिए जज ने गुस्से मे ये फैंसला दिया 😂
If husband was giving proof then at least court should have heard it. How can they deny proof? Sorry state of justice.
And what about video recordings in public places?
What if some serious crime happened and then this person confessed over the call.
Now this conversation has all the details abt crime, moto and weapons used BUT due to right to privacy this cannot be considered?
Indian judges should understand the right to privacy is not for only wife but it is also right of privacy for husband also, if both spouses have gone to court for their internal matter, then this matter is self proven legal.
Evidence kaha se layega koi .judge apne hi masti me magan hai
If someone is constantly threatening you over telephone, should you request him or her to allow recording its voice and do you expect he will say, ok.
And on the other hand if the govt. or any telecom authorities hold the right to record the conversations of their citizens or clients then why we the citizen of Bharat won't have the right to record the same for their own safety and security.
How can it be proven if any criminal commits a crime or give random threat over phone, how can it be proven before the Honourable Court?
As an electronic evidence, the original electronic equipment (e.g. original mobile phone where it was recorded) must be presented in working condition to be admissible in court as evidence.
इसका मतलब अब कोई भी इंसान किसी के पास call करके गाली गलौच दे सकता है।
और अगर कोई चोर गली में खड़ी गाड़ी चोरी कर रहा है
तो CCTV का सबुत भी अमान्य होना चाहिए
क्योंकि इससे चोर की privacy खत्म हो सकती है 😅
गजब के टोपीबाज जज बनें हुए हैं यार 🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂
Right to privacy violation is shouldn't be considered when someone is trying to collect evidence for judiciary cases purposes. Because that is the only way to prove himself innocent.
Right
I personally believe Phone recordings should be legally accepted as evidence. Because nobody does call recording routinely . Call recording is carried out by someone when there is an anticipation of a specific kind of crime likely taking place or to prevent oneself from becoming a scapegoat in a particular case. Violation of privacy should be given preference only after evaluating the merit of the call recording. Maybe the evidence can prevent an innocent person from being wrongly punished. I believe that the people speak in the true sense and exactly what they mean on the phone. A call recording is always chosen by a person who is defending the case and has no other option left.
There is a right to defend yourself . And collection evidence through any possible means for defending yourself in court should be legal. Phone taping can be illegal but if you are moving the court what you have talked is against you should be legal because court wants to know what king of talking has happened between you and the party. How can one understand what you have originally talked with someone.
Then because of right to privacy your finger print should not become evidence . Without consent you cannot collect any suspected criminal's finger print. Five senses are private . So evidence regarding five senses are invalid.
2:22 Case Law begins here 3:55 CrPC Sec 311 6:00 People Union For Civil vs UOI on 6 January 2004 Appeal civil 4294 of 1998 6:55 Supreme Court of India R M Malkani vs State Of Maharashtra on 22 September 1972 citations 1973 AIR 157 1973 SCR 2 417 7:25 Madhya Pradesh High Court Smt Anurima Mehta alias Abha Mehta vs Sunil Mehta on 27 August 2015 W P No 5833 2015 9:19 R M Malkani vs State Of Maharashtra on 22 September 1972 citations 1973 AIR 157 1973 SCR 2 417
If anyone has used this Platform for preparation of Judicial services , please post it's feedback 🙏
The same right to privacy can be misused, if someone falsely claims that blackmail is done via phone call, but he has no proof because he couldn't record due to right to privacy issue. 😅
जज बगल में बैठा चपरासी हर फाइल के लिए घूस लेता है लेकिन जज को नही दिखता है।
So if I record someone shooting other people, the honorable court will say it is under the right to privacy and you can't provide it as proof. I think it's really dumb that instead of checking that proof, the court nullified it. They could have put a penalty on him but noooo. They gave a dumb order.
😂tumko usse permission Leni pdegi bhai 😂
Ki me apko katal karte hue record karna chahta hu
😂😂😂😂
भ्रष्टाचारियों की कॉल रिकॉर्ड करना कोई अपराध नहीं है
I buy only those smartphones which comes with call recording feature without announcement.
Kya bat hai
जब दो लोग मोबाइल/फ़ोन एक दूसरे से बात करते है तो प्राइवेसी नही रही, क्योंकि जो बात थी दोनो ने एक दूसरे से बातें शेयर कीं,
जब उन दोनों में विवाद हुआ भले ही पति पत्नि हों या कोई भी हों, न्यायहित में सत्यता प्रमाणित करने के लिए उस रिकॉर्डिंग को गैर कानूनी नही मानना चाहिए
इसे अन्य उदाहरण से भी सामने रख सकता हूं
Then CCTV in Railway station, Street, Hospital everywhere is illegal under Article 21 😅😅😂 what a High Court but Supreme Court is good .
How they are allowing installation of cc cameras which basically records private behavior and how the police is allowed to present such recording as evidence in court?
हमारीJudiciary समय समय पर ऐसे हास्यास्पद फैसले देती रहती है😉😉😉
एक इंसान की जिंदगी तबाह हो जाती है और इनको पड़ी है Right to privacy 😉😉😉😉
E jaj desh me atank karana chahata he
It means kidnapper call for ransom against kidnapped person is legal as per Indian law if recorded without permission of kidnapper. Judge give new business idea, sabka saath sabka vikas.
I think judge eager to make this decision to be legalized his settings behind the court with criminals against their crime on call,
I believe it should be allowed..Husband shown this evidence for his self-defence not selling in the market. He is part of the recording and both are included. Do you believe if he could say that I am doing recording...please wait and speak ...
Can you imaging if a person is being bullied or threatened He /She cant use that recorded phone call
Judges ki accountability decide honi chahiye 😢
We support lokesh gurjar ji and his truth on which corrupt collegium judges have charged fine.
Baat rhi privacy ki to privacy tabhi tak private hona chahiye jbtak ki kisi dusre ki अभिव्यक्तित्व ko ठेस na pahuche. मूल अधिकार वहीं तक सिमित होना चाहिए जहाँ तक किसी दूसरे का अधिकार का हनन ना हो! High coart ने गलत फैसला दिया! ये कौन सा न्याय है कि हमें कोई कॉल करके धमकी दे और हम call record भी ना करें!
इस जज को कोई बोलो कि जाकर पहले अच्छे से law practice करके आओ तब Judgement देना!
Judge is sold out 😂😂
How is it a violation of privacy? Here the conversation is between two persons. One has recorded the conversation, unless it is brought to notice of a third person the privacy does not get violated. Before the conversation is produced before a court the permission has been sought. So there is no violation of privacy. Does right to privacy superceed right to justice.
Too much wrong interpretation of right to privacy...who will allow to record his wrongfull act..😂😂Just think on the ground level implementation of this judgement...
मैं डरता था सरकारी अफसरों को, वकीलो, जज साहब, नेताओ को, फोन पर गाली देने से मैम ने सब डर दूर कर दिया। 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Court would have allowed it if role was reversed. They will go to any extent to protect abla nari!!
Ye log ko judge kaun banata hai jo ish tarah ke kanoon banata hai mard agar apne khilaaf hue jurm ko prove kare jara koi judge se puchhe
Injustice against men will only increase crime against women. There should be some provisions in law to punish these cheap women who misuse law otherwise only hate against women in general will increase resulting in offense.
Phn cl record as a evidence prof not illegal 😊
I don't think if something that can't be used as an evidence in court does not mean it can be deemed as illegal.
Do Police for Traffic light CCTV, Malls or Restaurants take permission before recording and presenting to the Court in case of an offence?
Judiciary is the reason why men's don't want to marry 😢
It is like taking permission for call recording,, theft rape, corruption, call record after taking permission to preserve right to privacy 😅
fir to sare cctv camere bhi hta dene chahiye criminals ki bhi to right to privacy hogi.
😂😂😂😂😂
फोन रिकॉर्डिंग को कोर्ट में सबुत के तौर पर पेश किया गया होता तो एक सबुत बन कर केश को जितने पर मदद मिलती और यही होना चाहिए था लेकिन यह ग़लत हूआ है इसलिए आगे न्यायालय को ध्यान रखना चाहिए हमारी राय तो यही कहती हैं आगे न्यायालय जाने
Primary object of our judiciary system not to give justice & equality to men against women,,,,
Waaa re mere desh ke kanunn👎👎👎👎
जज लोग पागल हो रहे हैं आजकल। जब कॉल रिकॉर्डिंग भी कंसेंट से किया जाएगा... फिर तो कोई क्राईम रिलेटेड कॉल रिकॉर्ड करवाना ही नहीं चाहेगा।
हसबैंड वाईफ वाली बात थोड़ी अलग हो सकती है, मगर इसी थ्योरी को हर जगह लागू नहीं किया जा सकता। हर जगह की परिस्थिति अलग अलग होती है।
Pls add case law name in the description. It is very easy to know which case law your talking about.
R malkhani vs state of maharastra 1973
What a childish decision is that?
Woo😂😂😂niche ka bhi right to Privacy declare kar do..😂😂😂taki husband and wife maze na le sake.😂😂
Indian court me jana means torture hona, life destroy means indian court.
All laws can change and everything is doable when it comes to be in favor of Indian Wife. 😊
PROBLEM IS WHEN ONE PILLAR THINKS ITSELF SUPERIOR OVER OTHERS & STARTS TAKING THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OTHER PILLARS.
Most powerful people will be in advanteous position
11:45 It is neither Legal nor Illegal, no law for call recording. But can be sued as violation of right to privacy. You're welcome.
Kripya aapko apne dress pe dhyan Dena chahiye. Because you are a teacher
😊
Dare to Express Your Opinion Honorable Arjita Chaturvedi.
💯 % Agreed on your Suggestion Ma'am, Judiciary must think on your advice and do the needful rectification.
क्या धमकी और ब्मेलैक मेल वाले फोन रिकार्डिंग की परमीसन ब्लैकमेलर से लेनी होगी तब तो ब्लैकमेलर उनके खिलाफ केस रजिस्टर्ड ही नहीं होगा ?
इसका समाधान क्या होगा ?
My question is who will willingly allow to record the statements when you are in trouble or having court case .
Everyone speaks their mind clearly good or bad when they feel comfortable to share their input .
Next , everyone is scared to get tangled into court proceedings as witnesses due to long years of harassment faced . Truth tends to die fast when compared to liars .
So only way left is to record the conversation silently.
मोबाइल में कौल रिकार्डीग होना चाहिए इससे भ्रष्ट अधिकारी पर लगाम लगेगा
Laws accepted only because its law without its pros and cons is unacceptable with due unrespect for the judiciary particularly in this case.
हाईकोर्ट के इस फैसले का किसी तरह से भी स्वागत नहीं किया जा सकता है क्योंकि इस युग में कोई किसी की गवाही नहीं करना चाहता ऐसे में फोन, विडियो यही सहारा हैऔर इस पर वैध कानून की जरूरत है |
Wow. 😀. Right to privacy. If a husband murders his wife then it is also right to privacy. The Law should not involve on it. Aisa hoga kya kuch din baad... Cc tv camera is also illegal according to right to privacy.....
Helloo
So if call recording is not accepted by the judiciary ...then wives dont have these rights too
.
1. She cannot check his husband's phone without his permission
2. Cannot ask for passwords whther it is ATM or phone or locker
3. Cannot ask wherever he goes..for a day..night..week or mnth
So if our judiciary allow these things to hubsnd...then i think in this Chhattisgarh case..they hve taken right decision ...
Bcoz accroding to me all these things...like passwords also comes under RIGHT TO PRIVACY
Great Session Ma'am 🙏🙏
Judgement deni hai to police station pe do na jo ye saari khichadi pakata hai police station mein aur fir court mein de dete agar police station ne hi ye apraadh na kiya ho kisi ko fansane ka to koi evidence kyun bnayega
Judges should allow this call recording as an evidence to produce either by wife or husband as this is not right to privacy....it is absolutely fine as the argument is between the husband and wife...yes it could be illegal or right to privacy if an outsider or anu any other member records without the consent of the both..
Judicial system, lageslative, executive sabhi system ko sath milkar law banana chahiye ki call recording is legal