scientific and engineering notation explained

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 24

  • @Monk_Mode_Master
    @Monk_Mode_Master ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Thank you. Just started my Electrical Theory class and needed this explained a bit further.

    • @jack3927417
      @jack3927417 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same haha

  • @davidhuber6251
    @davidhuber6251 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wish everyone used metric and engineering notation for everything.
    Nice explainer.

  • @SeauxNOLALady
    @SeauxNOLALady หลายเดือนก่อน

    This channel is awesome! I love physics, even though I studied Cell and Molecular Biology in college, I have an interest in physics that I continue to learn almost like a hobby! I especially love astrophysics, but learning the fundamentals and the universal principles of physics helps me have a greater understanding of the more complex concepts. You’re a wonderful teacher for both young students and those like me who have long since graduated…

    • @PhysicsHigh
      @PhysicsHigh  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for the nice comment.

  • @pyrojm1916
    @pyrojm1916 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you, just got into my physics class and Electrical Principles. Very helpful and quick to understanding 😁👍🏻

  • @simonharrison9727
    @simonharrison9727 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Short, concise, interesting!!! You need to be teaching the teachers!!!

  • @cay22-n7n
    @cay22-n7n 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thanks!

  • @vickikay54
    @vickikay54 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why have scientific and engineering notation? Why not just one or the other?

  • @iamluMoni
    @iamluMoni 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi , Paul , thanks for the explanation but quick question here , can we agree that SciN requires us to have only one digit to the left of the decimal point ( For example: 1. 49 ×10 to the exponent 11) while Eng N requires us to have more than one ( for example : 0.149×10 to the exponent 12 ) ?

    • @PhysicsHigh
      @PhysicsHigh  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Correct and eng notation requires that the power is a multiple of three

  • @fepeerreview3150
    @fepeerreview3150 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very helpful! Thanks.

  • @gregroberts4545
    @gregroberts4545 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    okay first off, great video, but i needed to come to the comment section for a much more pressing issue!
    are you that good at writing backwards!? or do you legitimately have a t-shirt on that is printed in the mirror image so that it appears normal when you flip the video?
    thanks for the vid and the lesson :)

    • @PhysicsHigh
      @PhysicsHigh  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      😉
      The latter.
      And thanks

  • @zeyaley13
    @zeyaley13 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks a lot

    • @PhysicsHigh
      @PhysicsHigh  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are most welcome

  • @TrasherBiner
    @TrasherBiner 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    you are writing on a transparent glass/plastic. Hence the camera would record your text seeing it flipped like in a mirror. So, I thought "ok he just flipped the video on editing" but then I noticed your shirt and your shirt is not flipped. So my theory is , that your shirt is actually horizontally flipped in real life, so you can record yourself writing in this transparent board. Am I correct?

    • @PhysicsHigh
      @PhysicsHigh  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are correct 🤓

    • @TrasherBiner
      @TrasherBiner 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PhysicsHigh thanks for calming my mind, I was trying to tell myself "no can't be.... or can it" . Hey this is how science moves on right? Theorising about our observations and experiment on them and draw conslusions! Furthermore, neither of us is symmetric, this means I haven't seen the real you, I have seen an "isomer" version of you!

    • @PhysicsHigh
      @PhysicsHigh  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TrasherBiner haha that is true, so am I chiral? 😆

    • @TrasherBiner
      @TrasherBiner 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PhysicsHigh we don't like your kind here in this side of the mirror!

  • @jessahlabtan2260
    @jessahlabtan2260 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks, but your too fast!