"Why am I so weak at dynamics in chess?" | Magnus Carlsen vs ViciousSeal
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 เม.ย. 2019
- World Chess Champion Magnus Carlsen takes on chess24 user ViciousSeal in the final game of his third Banter Blitz session. Replay the game with computer analysis: chess24.com/en/watch/live-tou...
♜ Visit our deals page for daily deals! events.chess24.com/deals/
► Become a Premium member to get access to everything chess24 has to offer: chess24.com/premium
► Watch live and on-demand shows: chess24.com/en/live/video/
► Follow top tournaments with our state-of-the-art broadcast system: chess24.com/en/watch/live-tou...
► Play chess in our playzone: chess24.com/en/play/chess
► Improve your chess by learning from grandmasters in interactive videos: chess24.com/en/learn/videoseries
Let’s stay in touch!
► Subscribe to our channel: th-cam.com/users/chess24m...
► Like us on Facebook: / c24live
► Follow us on Twitter: / chess24com
chess24 is a chess website for players of all levels. Play against friends, learn the secrets of top grandmasters in video lessons and watch the best chess tournaments live with our state-of-the-art broadcast system. We'll also keep you informed about everything going on in the chess world and much, much more. Come visit us at chess24.com !
#BanterBlitz #MagnusCarlsen #Chess - เกม
Magnus Carlsen: Analyzes all possible future timelines of every current decision until the end of time.
Me: "Hmm, horsie can take tower! I wonder what will happen next?"
Hahahaha!
XD
@@erickelizondo789
Was he even human,
Lmao You sound like my Chess soul-mate 😂
nosferatu488 woah woah woah, u ok there?
Just start meditating and stay away from that toxic crap
Magnus be like," Why am I so weak? Why am I just a world champion but not the universe champion?"
his attitude is great. It implies that he desires to improve constantly and that is how people should behave in order to better themselves
Technically he's the best player in our solar system. Possibly our galaxy, and the universe. Unless aliens have been monitoring us, have discovered chess, enjoyed it enough to play it themselves and have a player that's better than Magnus Carlsen.
Chess was invented by the Blorions in the C6183 solar system and exported to Earth in the year 3200 BCE. There are better players than Magnus, but they have more than two nipples.
@@stagmeyer interesting.
@@minhtrietvo8448
Is this Marvel?
You are only weak at managing a freaking camera lol
@Xaxa xa smh not having a webcam or a tripod in 2019
Not every one can be a streamer like Jan mind u ,it takes practice to be such a pro even if magzs narcissism is better.Would love to c him play Ashley in banter blitz
Really scraping the bottom of the barrel for critical material.
Ibrahim Seck 😂😂
th-cam.com/video/QeqOO5dKgIs/w-d-xo.html
Magnus: "Why am I so weak at dynamics in chess?"
*Plays Stockfish recommended move*
You are so weak at dynamics because you continually outplay all of best players in the world positionally. It's a rookie error, really.
maybe thats the reason he is only CONSISTENT 2800+ player over decade
compared to others
what is the difference between dynamics and positional in chess?
@@Joseph-nh6in Positional play is typically seen as moves / strategy that has a long-term emphasis, whereas dynamics are tactics that win you the game, or lead to a better position, instantly, or over a much shorter term.
@@Joseph-nh6in dynamics are things that you can lose. Example of these are development advantage and initiative. Example of static advantage is a weak pawn if your opponent..
@@bhaveshkahaneable well yeah you're only as good as the people you beat so if everyone is mostly 2700s then you're not going to progress much beyond 2800 without learning computer lines or something
I really appreciate those videos, watching Magnus playing banter blitz with "normal" chess24 members. Entertaining and educational at the same time. Thank you Magnus, thank you chess24.
6:25
Here you can see a wild Magnus calculating approximately 1000 positions a second
Wha-
HE HAS THE TIME STONE!!!!???
'I guess it's ok!' 2 moves later.. 'yeh, he's toast!'
Lol
Magnus: “Okayy, H4. That’s what everybody does, right?”
Everybody:
living in a nice time. Just imagine, we had this kind of stuff with Capablanca, Tal, Fischer aso....
Respect to Carlsen to offer his time for us.
Fischer would never give it away for free.
thank u magnus for keeping your shit together over the years and giving us a lot of chess. Very unique for the GOAT to be like this.
Yeah I wish I were as weak as Magnus :/
"why am i so weak?" says the greatest chess player on the planet!.
Kinda said by Raoh on Hokuto no Ken.
"Convincing? No, wouldn't say so. Most definitely not. Interesting? No." 😂
Magnus Carlsen would only be satisfied when beating Alpha Zero 6 -0
All 6 games as black.
@@susugam3004 And playing blindfolded, and starting each game without a queen.
@@MrSsfsfsf
And 2 minutes less
It must be frustrating to be a world champion and to know that you don't have a slightest chance against Google's monsters. And we don't even understand how those artificially trained networks do it.
@@fractal97 well, he can consistently draw if not limited by time. But you are right that he has no chance of winning.
"Is it convincing? No it's not convincing, but is it interesting? No it's not really that interesting" xD I watch these vids for his play and his self banter equally
3:12 "Convincing? Neh, wouldn't say so. Interesting? no, not that interesting. But, it's what we have to work with."
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?? Every word is a lesson in itself. Thank you Magnus!!
No it's not. Stop fan boying. He's just saying it's not an interesting position to him because seen all the important lines 10 million times.
It could still be very interesting to you or me!
And which lesson did you exactly get by Magnus saying this?
I laugh when he said "who am I" lol what about the best chess player in history
Definitely want to see more Magnus banter blitz please!
At the moment it is not possible, because Magnus is playing the Shamkir Chess tournament right now.
@@JCMH Hopefully he comes back to this though, it's really fun to watch the WCC do banter blitz (even if it's not that banterous lol).
And by now, he’s probably showing his best version of dynamic Chess!
I really don't think he is weak at dynamics. His bullet games are some of the best dynamic chess I've seen. And I'm a huge dynamic chess fan.
Magnus is legend to all aspect of chess.
You know when Magnus says: "not sure how to justify It, but it just feels good" that his opponent has no chance... No one can beat a chess genius who is playing by instinct.
Who the hell is Marcus?
Magnus really plays down hes immense skill and genius .He knows hes in a winning position way before any opponent on here does .Thank you world champ for these videos
Nf3 is my weakness.
7:07 is when Carlsen states the title of this video.
He seems to just play lazy and laid back with average looking calculations, nothing too fancy. And then all of a sudden I realize he has a huge advantage over the board with at least 1 minute time advantage over his opponent. I never understand why still some other players, especially Nakamura, are considered to be even close to him in bullet/blitz chess.
I like how he says "feels good". Difference between people playing chess masterly because of intellect and training and a natural I guess ^^
Noone is a natural at anything.
Magnus is a freaking computer like holy shit, been analyzing his games with the help of Lichess and my god...he plays nearly perfectly each time...
Pete the engines point out something’s that humans wouldn’t consider blunders sometimes ,but on the other hand Magnus would find a lot of inaccuracies in his own play that the engine wouldn’t even consider a mistake or inaccuracy.
I’m not near Magnus but my average is about 2 to 3 inaccuracies and 2 or 3 mistakes per game according to stockfish but I consider myself making about 3x more positional errors or bad plans overall even if the position doesn’t evaluate much change like if it’s in a closed position. The engine doesn’t evaluate some complicated closed positions correctly sometimes.
Idk if Magnus can see these, but I'd love to see him play an engine and explain why it's move are so strong
hey maggy at 1:41 dark square bishop takes c3 pawn with check? was that a blunder?
At 7:22 what if Magnus moved his pawn to d6 instead of e5? Because then if the opponent captures the pawn with his pawn then Magnus can check him and the only move is to block with queen and then Magnus can checkmate with f7? If the opponent instead captures the d6 pawn with the rook then after Carlsen recaptures the rook then he will still be able to deliver check on the newly undefended f6 pawn. I am assuming there is a glaring noob mistake that I am making.
Edit: Lol, I just put this into stockfish 10 and of course it says to make the move that Carlsen moved.
5:10 Queen to A4 at this point an infiltrating move would have made Carlsen to play defensively. A check at d4 or central pawn grabbing at e4 would have unsettled Carlsen.
One cannot eternally defend Carlsen.
Next up to challenge Magnus will be Navy Seal ....
At 2:00, why not Bxc3+? Isn't it a free pawn?
3:21 Christoph Waltz impression lol
If only Magnus would one day say "oo that's a bingo!"
In 5.46 .,Magnus said d6. It was actually e6.
GOTTEM
Why doesn't black eat pawn at C3 at 1:57?
on 2:04 why did he not take the C3 pawn with his bishop also checking the king
Maybe a Idea to put the rating of te players in the text, because its impossible to read
i was going for r d1 also
The baby seal told his brother
Why he didn't take that black (white square) bishop on d7 and pinned his queen with Rb7 on the next move?
at 6:50 Qg5 is winning?? threat is Rxf6, pawn takes, queen takes - if queen block then either rook is hanging. if king moves then u can play Rb3 and check next move
if instead black plays Rg8, then Qh6+ rg7 qh8+ rg8 Rxf6 - same exchange as before but this time the black king cant move, so after queen block you take on D8
okay i missed rh7 that should keep it together.. damn
in this position 6:10 what you guys think of qg5 rg8, rxf6 exf6, qxf6 qf7, qxd8 kg7, rf1... looks attempting i guess
I like it. Though black would just get mated if he plays Qf7 with Qxf7# (backed by the pawn on e6). So Qg5 Rg8 would just result in black getting mated after Rxf6.
Maybe black can defuse the attack with Rh7? Let's say ... Qg5 Rh7, Rxf6+ exf6, Rf1?
I think Rf1 would win back the sac'd rook for white at least if not checkmate. Nice catch with Qg5!
6:18 me when I have to start my homework
A raiva q dar é q demoram muito pra fazer um lance de início, já tá enfrentando o melhor do mundo e ainda demora
Magnus Carlsen !!! Wait till we get Grischuck and Caruana casually streaming. Shout out Nakamurs yo!
At 1.41 why does black not take the pawn on c3?
Simon Williams must watch
4:48 why doesn’t RxF7 instantly win here? After QxF7, RB1 is winning right?
@5:02, why not rook-f take pawn f7? Queen forced to take, rook-b to f1, black rook h8 to h7 defending, free rook. Queen vs rook ending clearly winning.
Am I missing something there?
You are missing qf7 takes rook on f1. So it will be two rooks versus queen. Magnus's queen is very active but it might be just a draw
What about directly d6 instead of e5 followed by d6 at 7:20
I think it's the same. Qg6, Qxg6, Rxg6 and probably e5 is best. He can't take on d6, but playing d6 doesn't create a threat.
On 04:53 why not play rook takes f7 and after black is forced to take with the queen play rook b8 to f8? Wouldn't that win the queen?
Yeah but with Queen X Rook he would end up loosing 2 Rooks to win the Queen. Not necessarily a good exchange.
I start to understand
1000-elo-question: why can't he take on c3 with the bishop at 1:42?
Because after Bxc3,
Bd2. ...Bxd2
Qxd2. ...Na5
Bb5+. ...Kf8
Qc3.
And white is better and wins back the pawn....
Now where is my 1000elo??
He certainly can take the pawn, but it would weaken his position. Example: 10....Bxc3+ 11.Bd2 Bxd2+ (if he moves his bishop you take the knight so it's forced) 12. Qxd2 Nd4 13.Nxd4 cxd4 14.qxd4 and you have the pawn back with a good position. If 12...Nb8 holding on to the pawn, white has much more space and developed pieces. Black has a weak king and no pieces developed. So white can finish development or just play Qc3 attacking the c pawn and rook immediately.
You can, but after something like ...Bxc3+ Bd2 Bxd2+ (else Nc6 falls) Qxd2 Na5 Qc3 hitting h8, white has great play on the weakened dark squares and can also recover his pawn (Qxc5) if he wishes
Magnus's comments are often being made fun of instead of taking lessons. Neither Magnus nor the other players are robots. They all are human improving their skills each day. One of the main characteristics of human players which differ them from computers is the emotion which computers don't have. There are some moments in which even the best chess players feel weak and ruined for very simple reasons such as sleeping few hours, not feeding well the body, arguing with a friend or a lover , being withness of a scary thing in your daily life or the decease of a very close friend or family member. If you want to play powerful and achieve good result, you should play chess in your best moments. So i would respond to the question "Why am i so weak at Dynamics in chess?" because today you are not feeling well yourself.
Nobody's perfect, I guess (although you're pretty close). Your strong points far outweigh this 1 less strong point. Too hard on yourself as usual too, I think. But maybe that's how you always continue to improve too, idk. Thanks, good game Magzy!
Ps. This could just be a late (for us) April 1sr joke too, lol.
also at 4:46 carlsen could rook takes f7 check if black queen takes black the only move rb f1 pins queen on king? is maggy just screwing around?
i thought that too . perhaps he thought its 2 rooks for a queen but blacks rooks are not connected. so he should have gone for that.it may be better.
@@arishatz91 yeah for sure a queen is far more pesky than two rooks
@@wassimhindi6799 turns out engine suggests it but e5 is stronger.
Can anyone explain why the opponent didnt play bisshop c3 at 1:42?
After Bxc3, Bd2 will force an bishop exchange since the knight on c6 is under attack. Black needs that bishop since it is controlling the long diagonal and most importantly protects the king when he plans on castling.
Is his camera recording on VHS? Please, chess24, buy the man a webcam xD
He's not in the chess24 studios, probably somewhere abroad on his Laptop
if you weak what we are then :D
We dont exist in his scale
Infuriatingly weak.
Do you know about the extended real number in mathematics? Yes? Ok we are the infinitesimally weak lol.
Carlsen isnt at Human Level anymore. So he compares himself to engines and alpha0. And against computers he is in fact a weak player.
1:30 I would have made a move with a bishop C1 - E3 =)
You are weak? Hold my bishops...
Why didn't black just take bishop at @2:50?
Is this Pirc Defense?
5.04 why not peon to E6?
Guys, I'm pretty new to chess so I'm confused at 0:52. What's the point of that move? I know all the high-rated chess players play it, so there must be something I'm missing.
My guess would be a few things: It essentially lays claim to G5; which might be a good place to have a piece in many games, it opens up H2 in case the king ends up on that side. Alpha Zero likes the move too, so it seems pretty solid.
@@itchykami Oh, okay, thanks. To someone new to chess, like me, it looks completely random, lol.
@@raymondhmuifoo11 There's probably someone who can tell you better. Sometimes I do it.
5:08 why not pawn to e6? seems great to me
e6 f6 ?
i dont see a counter to e6 now that i look at it its forced.you cant do anything.you cant move the qween as then itll be mate,you cant defend the pawn.if you move the pawn forward logically by 1 as by 2 rook takes and everything falls apart.so if you move by 1 then rook sacrifice on f6,either pasn takes or qween blocks ofc pawn takes as if qween takes game is lost anyway.then white qween takes pawn.qween wont block cuz checkmate so king g1 as f1 back would lead to an eventual mate with the help of rook f8 check anyway,qween to g5 check king going f8 would be mate with rook so only other move is king to h2, leading to rook f8 and no way to stop the mate.pretty sure i missed some stuff.do correct me if you can even understand what i just wrote i dont know "Qfx6" and stuff like that.anyway haha take that magnus i made a better move than you hahahahahahahaha!
Just wow
Can someone tell me why carlsen is weak in dynamics? And what is dynamics means in the games of chess i dunno..thanks for the answer.
Zitadelle is alive 👌
agreed im obsessed
Someone knows what is the chess interface? It neither chess.com nor lichess?
JeSuisTonPierre chess24
Maybe i dont understand chess so well but why does he play pawn h4 at 1:03?
To attack Black's king side after Black castles shor with pawn h4-h5. If Black takes with the G-pawn, the H-file will be open for White's rook and queen.
4:48 why was rook takes f7 not played?? What am I missing after the other rook goes to f1 and then GG YO
Rxf7+ ...Qxf7
Rf1 ...Qxf1+
Kxf1
because magnus didn't feel like losing 2 rooks for just 1 queen
hello does Rxf7 works? 4:43
2 R for a Q and a P?
what happened at the end 😳
4:30 why did he move queen to g6? Isn't it being threatened by the pawn? P.s. I'm a total noob,thanks
rook pinning
Es magnuj calsen
Wherein Magnus Carlson demonstrates not only why he is a world champion chess player but that he is also a world champion trash talker. BTW, I'd give him knight odds... because it wouldn't make any difference to the result.
Me finding Rd1 and Pawn e5 before Magnus did and I think it was the only good move
Magnus: It's really dumb
Me: its a dumb move
8:36 can someone explain this end:(
If pawn takes than push the e pawn and soon you will have a queen
Montpellier 1985 unique Tournoi des Candidats à avoir été organisé en France. Réunissant durant 3 semaines les 16 prétendants au titre Mondial d’Echecs
tournoidescandidatsmontpellier1985.fr
ViciousSeal clubbed?!!!
Where is the lost? Dont blind of us?
What if Rxf7 at 5:02 ?
Rxf7+ Qxf7
Qxf7+ Kxf7
I guess he intended rxf7 qxf7 rf1.Anyway it feels like black pieces goes back into the game, probably white it's still slightly better but definitely worst than before
Did he just say "aaah my nuts" at 2:41?!
Yeah bro
Ah why not
How come he didnt take the knight at the beginning when it was just hanging out there?
Pressure
There was never a hanging Knight. It was protected by the Queen.
So cool.
Chess God.
What are chess Dynamics ?
6:53 why not d6?
@Peter Steel then you play e5
@Peter Steel check it out on the engine,d6 works as well 😉
Titles getting more and more pessimistic
Aleph Null clickbait 😉
Does Play chess eliminates calories?
Magnus be like why can't I play like an engine :/
He's not Caruana.
@@xxx_jim_the_reaper_xxx I think Caruana isn't that good in blitz
@@dert159
To become an Engine,
You must beat the Engine itself in Blitz.
That way, you can be better.
There are also chess24 users that used Engines to match Carlsen.
Great video.
Magnus is a pure genius.
But i have a huge doubt if he s bettee than Bobby Fischer. Bobby is the best ever in history, legend.
I'd say your opinion is fairly compromised at best.
@B V No doubt.
This man was unmatched, out of mind.
We can see also his match against Petrosian (1971) game 7, what he did in the move 22: Nxd7 !!!!.
This move was, i say, even the engines, best advanced computers, tell what you want, wasnt able, coudnt able, to see it. But because Fischer was out of this planet with a pure reflex, did it.
Bobby Fisher the last legend. R.I.P.
Hey anybody.... unfortunately I learned chess in prison and don't know a lot about openings but that's not my issue...I can normally LITERALLY have much higher ranked player in compromising positions where a normal chess player would complete the simply task....I CAN'T FINISH! FUCK.... excuse me
Can’t he afford a better face cam? He sure knows how to wear a suit though. (What a weird word “suit.”)
Average Human Brain Processing Speed = 60 bits/sec. Magnus’s Brain = 6,000 bits/sec 🤯
Magnus loves to play c4..i guess
That's because C4 is explosive..oh wrong channel
@@yorick021 terrible