Living in Canada, we've been seeing the changes for a long time. Over 20 years ago I noticed that in my city (east of the Great Lakes) we didn't get winter days where your nostrils stick together anymore. Winters also began being more humid because the lakes don't freeze solid as they used to. The seaway canal rarely freezes now. And last week we had a visit from the Polar Vortex which allowed us to break records that date back to the 1930's (it was -32°C plus wind chill). We're not supposed to get the Polar Vortex because the Jet Stream normally protects us from arctic air. And this is just the start...
I think that's why "climate change" is the prefer term over "global warming" because yes while the world is warming at a fast rate, it's more complicated when you view it at a more local level.
@@devinsmith4790 just my opinion, but I dislike the focus on calling it "climate change" alone. It should be, "rapid climate change caused by global warming". The climate is always changing, usually at a much slower pace, but simply saying "climate change" is not specific enough to describe what is actually happening. It also takes focus away from greenhouse gas emissions, which directly contribute to global warming. Just because the weather is colder than usual for a couple weeks doesn't change the fact that greenhouse gas emissions are causing the atmosphere to retain more heat from the sun.
@@devinsmith4790 it’s also not what they’re telling you. How many times do they have to change the narrative and you think it’s “new science.” Almost everything that the public knows has been researched for decades, and then the narrative is spun by centers of power to fit their agenda. Watch them tell you that they need to save you.
@@_ch1psetlmao how do you know? Were you there? Keep an open mind and be open to new info. Stop trying to fit things into existing theories. That’s not science.
Growing up up in the 70s and 80s. I can see a massive difference from then till now.. it's not the same anymore. You knew what to expect as the seasons rolled in years ago. Not no more ...it's nuts...
Weather engineering isn’t a conspiracy theory; it’s a FACT! Climate Change isn’t from humans using fossil fuels - it’s from wealthy globalists trying to play god- to cause chaos, fear and death, as usual! privatized Aerospace and Advanced Technologies have no Congressional oversight, no checks & balances. So what we get are parasitic, dim witted psychopaths sabotaging our world. They gotta go. They are outright narcissistic, self serving lunatics. Just ask the natives of Lahaina, on Maui- They have too much power! You don’t let someone with the awareness of a toddler drive your car do you? Some powers that be - are corrupted, depraved, and opened themselves to being possessed, due to their lack of spiritual empathy and their self serving, power hungry lust to control e Euronext and everything! When will they ever learn???
I'm not an expert but I know that one cubic meter of water can heat three thousand cubic meters of air to the same temperature, so ocean currents must play a big part in weather patterns because the air above the sea gets heated or cooled by these currents, maybe you guys should make video about that, it sure would be interesting to know more about this concept.
@@johnnyrebel3340 um, what you said is like the opposite of what's happening in this episode, in which they're examining how different forces are interacting with each other. you so brainwashed you just spend all your time remembering what you heard on fox instead of paying attention to what you're watching?
I live in south Tennessee in the United States. We've been hit by an unprecedented amount of tornadoes and flooding. When I bought my house, which is over 100 years old, I asked the previous owners (a church who had it built for their ministers) about flooding in the area and if it was necessary to buy flooding insurance. They told me they had only seen the back field flood once since the 60s. I was not in a flood zone either even though we have a small creek about a quarter of a mile behind us. Needless to say in the past 14 years I've lived here that creek has flooded our back field nearly to our back door at least twice a year in the past 5 years. Additionally, we are having a pretty bad mold problem in the area even in newer housing and people are seeing a pretty large amount of floor rot due to moisture. 100 year old farm house which is JUST now seeing the floor rot out due to moisture, well that says something. Never mind the animal migrations. Mountain lions and bears coming south while armadillos are coming up from Mexico. Nature speaks for itself if you listen. You may not agree with the human impact on climate change, but you'd be a fool not to agree that we are seeing change for what ever reason.
you are a wise person, Heather. Thanks for the news from Tennessee. Where I live in the PNW next to the ocean with a great deal of rain, we are also seeing 100 year floods as rain falls on the large Cascade volcanoes instead of snow and/or heat waves (like the one mentioned in the video) melt snow and glaciers so quickly, the rivers rise to levels not seen in decades and spill over the banks into farmland that was drained in the 1920s or 40s (much to the chagrin of the Native Americans who used those waterways in their lifestyle). Highways were destroyed in the interior parts of British Columbia, cutting off communities from supplies. Some towns like Hope required food to be helicoptered in. It was very frightening and likely our biggest risk up here.
You're right, I don't agree with the narrative that climate change is human driven. But there's far worse to worry about, such as the coming pole flip.
Resident of western Oregon here, at ground zero for last year's Pacific Northwest heat dome. This science is vital to me, and I heartily encourage you to keep up this coverage. Thank you!
You want to hear something totally weird about Portlands heat dome last summer? I was committed to be fishing all 3 days just barely north from the Ridgefield WA boat ramp. We thought we were in for a terrible time but a marine layer moved in for the whole time and protected us as well as the fishing. We hardly caught a sweat and caught limits. Blown away!
This is interesting. I knew things were changing in the early 1990's because the local lake I would go ice fishing on was freezing up less and less. Being a gardener, I also noticed that my growing season was shifting, some years I could plant a little earlier. It was erratic of course, but general trend was tending toward a shift in my frost zone.
@laughing Atyou Great advice to Robert Coplin, dear heart, perhaps you should follow it? First off, it's 'Milankovitch cycle', but we'll keep that between just the two of us. Anyway, Milutin Milankovitch hypothesized the long-term, collective effects of changes in Earth’s position relative to the Sun are a strong driver of Earth’s long-term climate, and are responsible for triggering the beginning and end of glaciation periods. The Milankovitch cycles include orbital eccentricity (100,000 yr. cycle), obliquity (41,000 yr. cycle) and precession (25,771.5 yr. cycle), which are all pretty long-term and don't go very far toward explaining why Robert's forsythia are now blooming in January. As a gardener in Michigan, I've noticed a similar trend over the past 10 years or so. It also doesn't explain observed changes in the migratory and nesting patterns of birds, along with a host of other phenomena. Finally, the idea of Milankovitch cycles being responsible for our current unprecedented episode of warming and climate change is so thoroughly discredited you should be kind of ashamed of yourself for even mentioning it.
I've had to plant later and later each year and spring takes more time to arrive. If the earth is really warming as the so called experts want us to believe, why are we experiencing colder temperatures? 7 degrees cooler than normal......I suppose theyre gonna tell me that's due to global warming too 😆😅🤣🤣🤣😂
Living in Indiana means the Jet Steam passes over us many times a year. This is why our weather is so erratic. We can have 30+ degree swings in the same week and sometimes the same day. Not to mention the extremes of having snow, rain, and then heat waves all in one day or the same week. It is wild
you are right I live in Ohio and we laugh looking at the weather forecast the temperature goes up and down in throughout 1 week and does it continuously up and down every week, we ride a teetered totter up and down!
The lake near by parents house doesn't freeze much at all anymore. During the cold weather during La Nina, we seem to get monsoon like fall- winter near New Years. Floods my parents basement it seems every time. People deny this, but heavens, just pay attention.
@@brianbailey462 Heh. But even though it didn't happen 10-35 years ago doesn't mean climate change or global warming... oh no, it just means... pigeons or something.
Right now the north of Mexico is suffering from a massive drought that has extended for far too long. We had songs about the rains of May, the massive migrations of butterflies in spring, and the cool nights of June. Now it all has changed, insects are almost non-existent, it only rained in may for four days instead of heavy rainfall for at least a week. The nights since April are at least 28°C and May started with 45° days. We haven't even reached the peak of Summer. The climate is changing, those who ignore it literally never go out of their house and pay attention to the bigger picture. My city is experiencing a changing climate like no other, and we are not prepared for the drought to last more than a month.
The American dust bowl of the Southwest was not due to CO-2 forcing. Climate changes do occur naturally as well as extreme weather events. It is normal to experience extreme weather and more than normal record setting cold or heat events within one to several years or decades. The record shows this.. ie: the east coast USA mini "ice age" of the mid 1800's... the European millennial warming period, etc.
@@mrrooster4876 It was the perfect storm, severe drought, and poor soil management, the great depression and the need to plow more land to break even. Take away any of these factors, no dust bowl... severe drought is significant, if not the primary cause.
About 25 years ago I heard a scientist say that we have had about 150 years of unusually good weather and we should prepare for it going back to normal. I've always wondered how bad normal was. Guess I'm getting a good look at that normal lately
I've lived where I live my whole life. The weather was way worse when I was a kid. Not just because I was a kid and it, "seemed" that way. We used to be able to jump off the roof into snowbanks, go tubing down drainage ditch chutes etc. It's nothing like that now. Just dustings of snow, a rare blizzard or two that's gone in a day or two, and then evaporated and drained out within a week.
@Buck Rothschild ..but the underlying question in all this is "Is it man made" or just a passing phase ? remember our life spans are just a quick flash in the scheme of things...
@@vincentl.9469 A question that has been answered over and over again. The only people with doubts are the people selling fossil fuels and they are spending billions on politicians and focus groups telling folk that it's not a sure thing . Meanwhile pretty every single scientists says it is man made and can present thousands of papers with the proof.
@@vincentl.9469 Ice age coming the historic data is crystal clear, perfectly natural it’s gonna get wild and bill gates is gonna blame it on you and me but I don’t care I’ll be ice fishing like mad 🎉
California is currently in a new megadrought which is why it hasn't been raining there for the past 22 years. The last megadrought in the western US was about 500 years ago and lasted a very very long time. I don't expect it to end for a long time. Of course climate change is playing a role in making these megadroughts worse than their predecessors
Yup, growing up in the SF Bay Area during the 80's and 90's, it used to rain throughout winter and the skies were always grey. Now it looks more like a semi desert in winter with blue skies and hills covered in dried grass and shrubs.
Oh, it’s happening now!! We’re making up for at least the last 3 years I hope. Gonna be a bit wild if we have a quick melt. It’s time folks with houses get subsidized water tanks. I have a friend with two. It supports her garden and more 🪴
Here in New Zealand's North Island's Waikato region, my personal experience over the last 54 years, is that our average climate has warmed. Our cold months in 1965 were from May to August, when we had frequent, frosty mornings. Now we don't really experience frosts that much and our Winter has shrunk to half of June and the month of July and what rare frosts we have, are almost a non event. Our Summer's are becoming extended and hotter. We are having more days up in the high 20's, low 30's now, than we did 50 years ago and rainfall seems to be more spasmodic and less. In the 60's, I would quite often wear a heavy coat ,scarf and gloves in the Winter. In the last few years I just put on a Jersey and haven't worn my heavy coat once during the very mild Winter's we've had. If this trend continues, I feel we will become frost free like the far North region of the North Island.
Your Aussie cousins here. Do you find it difficult to find similar information about the Southern Hemisphere? It's all connected, but they appear to be looking at only half of the information. Is it just me?
I'm in QLD Australia in now. But growing up in England is was used to seeing hard frost in the winter, cold winds and actually quite dry after the storm season in October and November. But from my teens until I moved to Aus we found that we hard mild winters that brought more rain and warmer weather. That's in my time growing up, only 29 years.
@@yt.personal.identification One aspect probably is that more of Earth's landmass and population both are in the northern hemisphere - but let's not miss that most countries at or south of the equator were colonized by Europe, and still deal with the aftermath. The money and resources for this research is concentrated up north. That said, the impact of the Antarctic continent and the South Sea on the south jet streams would be very interesting to know about.
@@autochton Sure, but as the data appears to be mostly from satellites, then it suggests the data is available, but just not as 'popular' to analyse. I imagine someone somewhere is working with the data.
@@yt.personal.identification It's the same with astronomy. They always concentrate on the Northern Hemisphere. We've always been considered to be slightly less important in the scheme of things. We're rarely mentioned on International news channel's
Even if you think you don't need air conditioning where you live, you could still get a freak event like in the Pacific northwest in late June 2021. Then being able to cool the air in your house could become a matter of life or death. So get an air conditioning unit and have it ready in case of an emergency.
My home area in Germany was flooded last summer, and the amounts of rainfall were completely unprecedented. About 100 People lost their lives when their houses were swept away. It was really chilling to watch it unfold from afar (I live in California and saw it happen on youtube), especially because I am so familiar with the region. This was a wake-up moment for me. Making the public aware of this is absolutely important. Keep up the good work!
Unprecedented? The flood disasters of 1804 and 1910. What was probably the most catastrophic flood event in recent history hit the villages along the Ahr already at a "CO 2-free" time in 1804.
@Paul M Yet the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere will lead to an ice-free Earth in 500 years if left unchecked. Not an existential event for humans, but certainly less hospitable. There is no downside to more nuclear power plants, solar and geothermal.
About 30 years ago our local weather guy used to tell us that as new developments (housing,apartments,industry..etc) was being build out from the cities on wetlands,farmland and grassland..that eventually it would create a heat island affect…either causing droughts or really bad weather…I do notice now that our region has expanded 20 to 30 miles out from our large city..that storms coming our way either disappears or intensifies..no longer do we have the all day rains of the past…just a observation.
On SW Long Island, downwind of NYC and NJ, I routinely track rainstorms which have big impact upstream of the city, and then often rain on the city, but generally now we just watch dessicated mammatus clouds glide overhead ... the trend is not novel, but has become exaggerated in past 30 years.
I am in Nebraska. I have been noticing such weird changes in weather. When the Tennessee/Kentucky tornados hit in mid-December we got 80 degree weather and severe thunderstorms. It was so weird considering the fact that we had snow two days earlier. Another thing is we barely get tornados or severe weather in the springtime, now we see the south getting hit much more. Now Nebraska is getting derechos. We had two severe straight line winds go up to Iowa in just two years. Its worrying.
Chalk it up to high tech, high energy weather machines that can both heat and cool the atmosphere. Nothing new, they've been around for decades it's just that ppl in positions of authority are becoming real control freaks these days.
There are many factors affecting the climate. Every year 14.6 BILLION gallons of fuel are evaporated into the atmosphere just filling our tanks with fuel worldwide. The fluorocarbons released into the atmosphere in the 20th century are finally dissipating, reflecting less light from the sun. The coal and other fossil fuel soot stored in the northern ice pacts over the last 500 years are causing the ice to melt faster than we predicted. Permafrost is releasing billions of metric tons of methane into the atmosphere every month. That is only some of the things we have going on, there are many more. An old proverb says, "The wise one sees the calamity and avoids it." We all should learn to be wise; we will need it in the near future.
@@rnedlo9909 Don't worry Bill Gates has a plan to spray particles into the atmosphere that will block the sun's rays and cool the earth. Also wonder if the light from sun is getting thru more............Why are there ANY areas of the globe experiencing record cold temperatures, which some are? Seems rational worldwide, that it would only be hotter on a continual basis.
I talked to a friend of ours last year, who turned 99, if she notices the weather being different now than when she was little, in the 1920's. She said, "absolutely, there's no question the weather is different, we used to get much more snow in the winter and much more rain, in the summer monsoon season, here in Flagstaff, AZ." It's great to listen to scientists but listening to someone who's 100 years old, is pretty enlightening. We're planning to move away from the southwest U.S., it's too dry and getting hotter, every year.
Hell, you don't even need to be that old. I'm in Canada and during the period of 2010 - 2020, six out out of those ten Christmases have been green or with barely a light dusting of snow. Back in the 90's, the first snowfall being in October was common enough that our Halloween costumes had to be large enough to fit over our snowsuits.
There is no such thing as stable climate on Earth, century to century the climate is typically different, it was once warm enough to farm in Greenland and grow quality vineyards in England, some ancient coastal cities are over a km away from the coast now, others are completely under water, we've always known the oceans levels change over time. Climate change is a fact, you can't stop the natural progression of the Earth, climate change has wiped out many civilizations throughout history. Still we can't assume human activity and greenhouse gasses won't make climate change worse, cities with only electric cars will have much better air to breath, you shouldn't need to be tricked by climate change rhetoric to do the right thing...
Lived in Oregon my entire life. I hate that this hot patch is sitting over the PNW and keeping it dry and hot and not rainy and foggy and diverse climate with temperate rainforest type ecosystem... I hate warm muggy dry weather.. things really have been very different lately. That huge fire evacuated so many towns around where I live and where people I know live. People lost their homes. We've not seen stuff like that my entire life. I was born in '89.
i moved back to oregon from michigan to escape the muggy summers and chilling winters just to have my neighborhood burn down and have a muggy summer afterwards. It's so different now. First a huge fire and then this winter we got snow that lasted TWO DAYS ON THE GROUND only 8 miles inland from the ocean.
Support carbon-free nuclear power. And a moratorium on immigration. In 1950, pop of USA was 150 million. It has more than doubled to 335 million, in 70 years!!! Unsustainable!
When i was a kid the clouds were always very high in the sky.. now there are days that the clouds seem barely above the trees..i noticed this a few years ago and all jetss that flew over head had two contrails that dissipated.. more they get long and wide enough to cover the sky.. are all these things connected?
Back in the 1970's when picking plants for the yard I was told that temperature range was moving to the north. No one was in tuned to climate change. This was simply observations that were made at green houses. We now have a reason for these observations.
If we hold up the Texas freeze wave of February 2021 as an example of jet stream change due to anthropomorphic climate change, how do we explain that it has happened before, previous to the industrial revolution? How do we explain the Western fires of 1910, when TEN million acres of forest land burned in THREE DAYS? How do we explain the single biggest human loss of life due to a hurricane in Galveston in 1905, long before we began emitting CO2 into the atmosphere at industrial revolution levels? Is there a chance this is all cyclical, and we as humans have nothing to do with it? Is that possibility getting millions in grant money for studies? If not, why not?
I do believe humans have a lot to do with climate change but it is worth investigating other factors. Anyone who goes on about "scientific consensus" is not really talking scientifically, consensus means nothing when it comes to science because truth is not a democracy. Science is always supposed to be questioned, it is never "settled". In fact there have been loads of times where the consensus among the educated was completely incorrect, going all the way back to antiquity. In fact pretty much everything we believe today was once a theory that was ridiculed by the educated at the time of discovery. Heliocentrism, evolution, germ theory, plate tectonics, I could go on.
Western forest fires - maybe the incredible extent of logging which used steam powered equipment and fire shutdowns weren’t a thing? I lived in the Pacific Northwest in logging country and safety wasn’t a concern until the 60’s. As for the Galveston hurricane, large weather events and poor weather forecasting are a deadly mix. As far as I’ve seen, the people working on climate issues are NOT getting rich. I can’t say that about the owners of coal companies and oil corporations.
@@briangarrow448 There was steam and hydro at saw mills, but in the woods it was all done by hand. The 1910 fire (AKA The Big Burn) was a part of a regular cycle of fire in the West that was interrupted by human interaction, and the policy of dousing every single fire for decades. We are now reaping the benefits of overgrown forests. The Galveston storm was forecast, but ignored by officials and civilians. But the storm was absolutely massive, before we gave them names and tags of fear. And before Industrial revolution pollution. People directly working on studying anthropomorphic climate change are not getting rich, but the amount of money spent is ever-expanding. The paper pushers and non-profit CEO's getting the grants are doing just fine. How many gov't studies are looking into my original question, or have results that might lean that way? If they exist, why does PBS not present that info?
@@corey6393 Trees we’re cut by hand. They were moved by steam donkeys and then rail or log rafts or splash dams. The Big Burn was started by lightning if I remember correctly. Do you have any supporting data that backs up your claims about paper pushers and environmental CEO’s blossoming across the country? I’m curious because I have volunteered in employment support programs and frankly, that’s not a massively growing field for potential jobs. Maybe the job market has changed since I retired.
@@briangarrow448 Yes, the Big Burn was started by lightning, but what environmental impacts created the situation? Were they human caused? It was a single largest acreage burned on record in this country, and it happened before the current climate change freakout. But it was over 100 years ago, and it didn't happen in California, so it has been forgotten. I don't have a pile of papers sitting around to prove claims, I just watch, read, and listen. On a small scale, I have an example of local watchdog groups getting grants and funding to pass laws, and require training and fees for stormwater runoff protection. I have been through the training and paid the fees. I have performed the mitigation processes on jobsites. And not once was any of this site work actually inspected by those in the group. They take the money up front, and never follow up. I know that is not specifically about climate change, but it is about ecological protection. The leaders of that particular group live better lifestyles than those they train, and never get their hands dirty.
Also, here in Southern California, this Winter has been the coldest average temperature in my memory, and we hardly got any rain (again). It's still relatively "subtle" but the fires speak for themselves.
Fires are at a multi decade low. In spite of all the recent focus on the California forest fire tragedies and contrary to most public pronouncement, forest fires in his state are declining with the rest of the northern hemisphere. The United States Geological Survey’s fire scientist Jon Keeley checked the data for California back to 1920 and found that the number of forest fires peaked in the 1970s with a significant decrease since. I can't post the link because if I do TH-cam deletes the post. The more facts I post the better the odds of deletion. Reminder: disinformation is only that which doesn't fit the narrative that the ruling masters are forcing you to believe in.
@Mark Berryhill Here in Australia we are pretty much aware of the effects of climate change and the causes, although it would be good to include the other half of the world.We suffered what we now call the "Black Summer". We choked on the Eastern Seaboard from Southern Queensland down for months. We have bushfires here, in fact our Forests have evolved to account for it but NOT that extensive and that intense. "The Climate scientists predicated Australia would be the first to feel the effects of climate change and its increasing severity. They were right. However, like every where around the Globe, where ever there is a Conservative government, there is little or no action. At the hight of the conflagration, our Prime Minister snuck out of Australia and went to Hawaii.He was pilloried for it and our own Shock jocks tried but failed to put a positive spin on it. Our PM and his government is STILL in denial , taken kicking and grumbling to the Paris agreements. Here we are talking about science and then politics sneaks in, so desperate are they to prop up the existing order and ideology. Houses on the east coast are being washed into the rising seas with every severe storm. Mild dry winters and either intense dry heat or tropical humidity summers, where it shouldn't be. That is our reality now and this in only 20 years. I think the scientists projected time for change is overly optimistic. They should shave 20 to 30 years off their future projections on the ill effect of severe climate change.
Fires have happened all the time; the only difference is the amount of people now living in fire-prone areas. Same with the water supply in the Colorado River basin; the water supply hasn't changed over centuries, only the demand.
This is one of the best and most simplest explanation that I’ve seen on the changes in the jet stream. My husband and I have actually been watching Al Roker on the Today Show for the last 20 years, and I have noticed a change in the Jet Stream because again I’m a faithful Weather Watcher. And so I was not surprised to see you say these changes of the last 20 years because I have to. Thanks so much.
Once the entire planet was frozen if not a few times. Once the entire planet was warmer and no polar ice caps. There's even times where the magnetic North and South shifted. The sun is sometimes generating more or less energy. Climate changes have happened for 4.5 billion plus years... History is fascinating and tends to repeat.
Nailed it! The Climate is not a static phenomenom. It changes! Iceland once had no snow or ice and farmers grew grain in Greenland. Avocados and Fica trees once grew in the Brooks Range in Alaska. More recently, the same plants grew in northern Idaho. Point is, Climate changes. Adapt or perish.
I just saw the weirdest weather for the time of the year! Today is November 27 and we just had a massive thunderstorm system move through the area. It was moving about 70 mph I estimated. I wish that I could show photos of it from my weather app.
@@austinp.5024 mmm idk though. I thought she was low key trolling the corporate farming industry as cows are a HUGE source of greenhouse gases but they are nearly impossible to get in check because we all love our burgers and steaks and there’s really no such thing as successful small family farms anymore. It’s all corporate now. Lobbyists see to it that they are untouchable in every way. No one wants to give up meat even for a single day per week. I’m guilty of it too so don’t @ me. I love beef. I love bacon. I’m just sayin why I think she’s wearing that cow print.
Cloud seeding has been going on around the world since 1953. Not only can this be done as warfare but also for corporate advantages. no mention of this, nor any mention of the cooling from 1941 t0 1978
I would be interested in knowing exactly what different countries are doing about this issue and how each individual can help. I feel that some countries are more concerned about invading other countries rather than actually preserving the world we live in.
@@UmmYeahOk think about the power of money! Russia is nothing more than an old gas station, but as has been reported putin is one of, if not the richest men in the world. He did not become that without pilfering the Russian peoples resources along with his oligarch buddies. With the encroachment of NATO after they gave up east Germany the deal was that no more would join NATO. Now that many have, and the history of Russian treatment of thieving dictators once out of power putin is naturally worried as he is without a doubt been the biggest thief Russia has ever had! Keep in mind that Ukraine is not just a bread basket, it has become a manufacturer in great demand for their educated skilled work force especially for automotive wiring harnesses. Then there is the topography, as there is nothing but plains between Western Europe and Moscow in fact Ukraine goes even further east than Moscow. Just seeing how putin meets with his closest people, generals and political underlings, at those insanely long tables, the man is obviously becoming more and more unstable in his fear of being assassinated.
We cant do shit, this planet has always had hot periods, cold periods, polar shifts, earthquakes, ice ages, asteroid strikes, volcanoes etc! 250 million years ago there was a period where the whole planet rained for 2 million years!
@@frankhartman323 Agreed! The insane part is people thinking they can stop or change weather patterns with Money and restrictions from individual Country's. Stop the Madness People!
I live in PNW and I've seen intense changes in weather. We've gone as long as 7 months without any precipitation. I've put a bucket out with a stick to prevent small animals from drowning. Deer have sucked it dry.
Back in the late 1980s I was shovelling a foot or more of snow off my grandparent's driveway, several times a week. It was considered normal (as was our nose hairs freezing together) and there was no question of shutting down in those conditions. Just last week my Ontario Canada city pretty much shut down because we got 5cm/2" of snow. We've become so used to warmer winters, here, that we no longer have the infrastructure to cope with a light dusting of the white stuff.
That's nuts, I figured all of Canada would have all city's covered with plows, we don't get what we normally get her either and that's in western Michigan. 10 years ago we had so much snow my cows could have walked right over the fence if they wanted. But that's with lake effect snow. We got dumped on that year.
You’re not the only ones. It seems the whole of the NYC metro has forgotten how to deal with winter weather. I swear it’s almost as if the majority of people are actively wishing for climate change to bring an end to all forms of solid perspiration in the area. I can’t stand it!
Technically Seattles’ landscape was formed by glaciers & we too can’t deal with 2” of snow. However, this doesn’t support human caused climate change so we dismiss this as climate change
I was in Lytton BC (near Vancouver) when it caught on fire and burned to the ground. The whole town. Gone. The previous two days it got up to 49.6C. This is no joke and I don't think it is even a matter of being optimistic or pessimistic anymore. Too little too late.
I lived in (sorta nearby) Pemberton BC for a few years and all the horrible things that have happened to BC this past year just breaks my heart for everyone. It hit 40C a couple times in Pemberton when I was there, but I can't imagine it getting any hotter. I'd much rather experience those hot temperatures in Arizona, where I currently live.
Quality content professionally presented. No hyper-graphics, no smoked-glass weather studios, no over-produced segments with over-polished anchors. Just clean, factual and highly informative. Score: 10
Minus 10 for deliberately ignoring obvious science about the magnetic coupling of the earths poles to the sun which is the reason for polar warming in the first place.
@@trevorh6438 Really? Where did you get that tidbit of information? What does magnetism have to do with airmass movement? So you are pushing your political dogma into science now? Not going to work.
I’ve only been on the planet for 70 years, but my recollections back to my youth are that, although we certainly had extreme weather-3 feet of snow, powerful thunderstorms, hot and dry summers, etc.-one, the frequency has increased, and two, anomalous weather patterns like superstorms, the polar vortex, etc. have also increased. Something as simple as the jetstream moving northward could explain a lot. I guess the million-dollar question is whether we can reverse that or if it’s too late.
We were talking about the coming ice age back when you and I were kids in the 1970's. Earth has been in an ice age cycle for the last 2.5 million years (100,000 of ice, 10,000 years or so of interglacial warming period). I comment " Who ever told you that climate stability is for this planet, do you see any other planet with climate stability anywhere?" on all the climate topics.
It's never too late, the longer we put off ending emissions the more changes will happen but it's a sliding scale, we can avoid worse outcomes by starting now.
@@fudgedogbannana A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. You have some understanding of facts, but miss the actual picture. Please keep reading and learning.
@@jessmore9870 there’s patents on the technology and it was publicly talked about in the 50’s & 60’s if you do any amount of research you’ll see exactly what’s being done and why the chemtrails are being sprayed in our sky’s
@@BaconJD420 Patents on what? Geoenginnering? Chemtrails? Cite one piece of "research." Conspiracy theorists always say "do the research" because they don't know what they're talking about.
@@jessmore9870 and lazy dimwits Believe what they’re told not even with their own eyes see like a beautiful blue sky that turns to a dull grey mess in a matter of a hour or two by planes “exhaust” but not every plane, just some, and apparently they can turn the “exhaust” off and on in mid flight, you must be a complete fool, stop looking at instagram and twitter for a few and view your surroundings for once you might just learn sumpin dipshit, why have the levels of aluminum and barium exploded in our water and soil samples in the past 20 years? Your probably not even old enough to have witnessed the change’s that have occurred
The first December tornado in Minnesota's history reportedly touched down in Plainview in Wabasha County during the 8 p.m. hour Wednesday ... Dec 15, 2021 That is unheard of until now.
@@topfuel29channel it's not unheard of just hasn't happened as much recently. But yes they have been tornadoes as far north as Canada in the winter time do the research
I live between Ottawa and Montreal in Canada and we have started to get more and more tornadoes. It's also hard to think that while we in eastern Canada got heavy rain, the west coast was burning :(
I live in Ottawa and for years I've had recurring dreams about living in communities where the buildings are domes to be tornado resistant. They are a concern to me as well.
In the west we have always a loads of rain but last year we had more rain than ever before, so much so that the Fraser valley completely flooded. Summers have been hotter an hotter to the point that we got halfway to boiling. Autumn winds have been getting stronger and stronger and so have spring winds to the point that we have had extreme weather warnings that include tornado warnings
The increased north/south amplitude of the jet stream means more dramatic shifts in weather. I tell people that when the jet stream dips over the east then we have "snowmageddon" in Washington DC while Denver has a thaw. After two to 6 weeks these arctic dips move eastward and then Denver is in deep winter and DC is in a thaw. Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University hypothesized over ten years ago that the loss of perennial arctic sea ice created these dramatically greater "meanders" in the jet stream north and south. I have been watching it happen from NE Utah for ten years. These are dramatic shifts from cold to heat and wet to dry. Over a greater period of time (decades) this will "average out" and yes southerly areas will on average will be dryer - but the effect on the ground will be very erratic from wet to dry and hot to cold for decades to come. Weather shifting from hot to cold/wet to dry on this 2 to 6 week timescale will become more extreme until there is more mixing of the arctic cold air masses and the tropical warm air masses. Once this mixing is complete and somewhat stabilized (decades ? centuries ?). we will once again have tropical vegetation in Greenland and hopefully more stable and consistent tropical/sub-tropical global climate. If we stop producing greenhouse gases. We could even return to normal after 35,000 to 45,000 years. (see research of James Zachos of University of California.) If we keep forcing the heating of the atmosphere and the globe - we will begin to face increased heating and drying of the planet turning large portions of the planet into inhospitable desert. The most severe period like this occurred 250 million years ago during Permian-Triassic extinction event. Known to scientists as "The Great Dying". 80% of marine species died. 70% of terrestrial vertebrates, and it was the largest extinction of insects. Contemporary human civilization as we know it would not survive these conditions. The fear is that with the rapid rate of warming we will unlock problems like thawing the vast amounts of frozen methane in the arctic seafloor and releasing gaseous methane into the atmosphere which will accelerate warming. Causing a cascading series of failures that we cannot manage. Even while there are natural processes that are buffering some of these effects, the planet clearly has enough history of dramatic degradations of the habitable environment that we need to be very careful. Already, IPCC is saying we need to stop producing greenhouse gases in 3 years to avoid very grave risks. So we really need to pull together and realize that we are all in this together - there is no viable escape (despite what a half-dozen billionaires might believe and are willing to accept - as they try to jump,ship.)
The hubris of those billionaires will come crashing down once they realize you can't ultimately fight mother nature and natural law.....no matter how rich you are.
I had a junior high teacher in the early 60s who told us about the global warming theory. He told us that the jet stream and weather would get unstable and the extremes would get more extreme. He was teaching what theories are and said global warming was an example of a very new theory.
When I was young (1950) weather was just something that happened. Now it is a major aspect in the lives of people everywhere. One Observation of local weather in northern Thailand (my home for 20 years) has been the flower season has moved from April to March.
Excellent explanation of the drivers affecting the jet stream. As an old school Air Force navigator the jet stream was highly important to my job, and understanding it's ebb and flow were a primary focus of my preparations and in-flight calculations. Weather has therefore always interested me. That said, I would like to see if there is research going back further than 1,000 years. We are, after all, still living in a period of geologic glaciation (over the last 2 million years) and we are used to the climate conditions endemic in this period. It defines "normal" to us, but our short life spans have necessarily driven the focus to short-term conditions within 1 or 2 generations of our life. We need to understand the larger scale impacts of natural changes throughout geologic history as a precursor to understanding the impacts we humans have been having on the planet.
There's tons of research into climate behavior and global temperature using ice-core samples, going back millions of years. With that in mind, I wonder if it's harder and more time-consuming to specifically study the jet stream. Perhaps they can go further back in time now that they've trekked all over Greenland to get the ice-core samples. But the jet stream seems like a very fiddly, highly specific thing to try to nail down, especially when you _have_ to map out every year to see how it's behaving. That's an excellent point, about how we need to focus on the long-term too. We've had several greenhouse periods in the past. Maybe we'll end up like the last time it happened, 55 million years ago, when the global temp was 5-8C higher than now. The arctic will turn into a rain forest again, and crocodiles and palm trees will live up there again. I mean, that's gonna take a few thousand years for species to move/adapt. But maybe that's where it'll all end up. In the meantime, if that's the road we go down, we're gonna have massive climate migration since the equator's gonna be uninhabitable. Lots of relocating of food production too. I guess the good news is that since the permafrost is melting (which is driving the greenhouse cycle), there will be plenty of rich soil to grow things in.
Interesting thought. Careful how far back we go though. The north pole didn't have much ice between 5.33 and 2.56 million years ago. Jet stream likely much weaker or non-existant.
@@matthensle9391 Thank you for the heads up. That truly wasn't my intention. I can see how my comment would have come across as so or even aggressive. It is a topic, like most, I am overwhelmed with and frustrated. I apologize if it was taken as spam. My desire is for information in all respects be made aware of, and hope we can shine light on hope. Stay safe out there!!
I wonder if there is any correlation between jet stream movement and the heat island effect of sprawling cities. I remember riding my motorcycle out of city limits at night in the summer and the temp dropping significantly
Yes you may well be right. Heat added is heat added. Concrete heats up where forests don't. It's not the co2. It's the heat added through human activities and infrastructure not the air. We can't stop that unless we kill off billions of people. This I would not recomend.
@@lawneymalbrough4309 I wonder if putting roof top green spaces, and painting roofs of homes and minor buildings white would help alleviate heat soak and reflect solar radiation/absorb it in plant life, would help anything. Like minor changes might have drastic long term benefits, like asphalt roads being painted or having dyes in them to make them light gray instead of black, as black soaks up heat and radiates it for hours and hours. Light gray will still heat soak, but nowhere near as bad or for as long.
I would agree that there is a correlation to these massive concrete structures in which they cause more heat in the cities due to the lack of green spaces. When you have cities that have these huge warehouses sprawling all over the place it causes major environmental problems. One has to wonder how much junk do we need to keep flowing into these countries? Maybe if we go back to the basic necessities of life we may help change the course of all this.
It's all because Jesus Christ. Is coming back Soon. Read my comment. What I typed takes out all the guess work. That I have commented often to folks. In this Nation and world wide on You Tube. For a very long time now. I take none of the credit in doing so. ALL the Glory and Honar goes to The Lord. I'm just a messenger (-:
Whenever you watch the news and it comes around to the weather report the meteorologist will always mention when a record has been broken. Over the past 25 to 30 years the increase in the number of records broken really scares me. The first day of summer this year was 101 degrees (38 Celsius) where I live and throughout the summer there were several days in the 90s. Last December we had a couple days in the 60s and 70s and even had a few tornadoes. Where do I live...Minnesota. Yeah, tornadoes in Minnesota IN DECEMBER!
This has caused the annual amount of tornados in my region of Ontario Canada from 2 to ~40. One nearly leveled my house in Barrie this summer, it came within 150m of it!
i live in texas and luckily have never seen a tornado, but have definitely been close to a few. nothing is worse than huddling in a closet, hearing the sirens going off. all you can do is hope you dont get hit, it is a hopeless feeling.
This makes a tremendous amount of sense. IE if it does move north, the northeast will be hit with a lot more hurricanes. Due to them not being able to be pushed east via the jet stream.
Not necessary "more" hurricanes. But stronger and longer lasting storms and a longer hurricane season. Remember the movement of weather systems will slow down with the Jetstream. While ocean and air temperature increases and winters get milder. Still bad.. if your not a mosquito.
@@NewPipeFTW I would argue that the increase in sea temperatures, does and will signal an increase in the number of tropical cyclones across the world. Now on the other hand, tornado frequency is not as certain.
The Northeast has actually gone through one of the longest periods on record with barely any hurricanes. Back in the 1950's 1960's they got struck constantly. The last Northeast hurricane landfall was Bob in 1991 31 years ago which is a huge amount of time considering there's some years where they got hit by 2 powerful hurricanes in one season like 1954
Paul Beckwith has been breaking down the science of the Jet Stream and Rossby Waves on his TH-cam channel for years. He did a video explaining why the cold weather in Texas coincided with abnormally warm temperatures over Greenland during February 2021. The truck crash at 3:37 in this video is a perfect metaphor for those who ignore the signs.
Yes, it was very informative. I wish most of the people in the U.S. could watch this and understand the reasons for it, instead of insulting the way Texas had to respond to something that hasn't happened there in over 135 years with it's sub zero arctic ice storms for 4 days and shutting down everything all the way to Mexico and killing all the subtropical crops and shutting down energy to the rest of the country. Texas infrstructure is designed for extreme heat up to 115 degrees F, not negative 21 degrees F. Utilities here have to be cooled, not heated. Can't have both.
predicting future would support theory (understanding of cause and effects) correctness, so tell me something i do not know makes lots of talking head jobs . . . .
This is exactly what I was suspecting all last year, it was the only way I could explain the Texas deep freeze and the BC heat dome. Where I am in Alberta also felt the heat and choked on the forest fire smoke for two months. We need to adapt better now, because it’s happening now.
So glad I don’t live inland. All the pollution from the wildfire smoke went to NY, Midwest, & Europe. Funny cause they’re the ones saying it was a Cal/WestCoast problem when the skies are relatively clean by the coastline where majority of the population lives.
@@NanNaN-jw6hl that would be great, actually. Even if it started to reverse, it could take years. I was thinking in terms of a city being able to handle a snowstorm, or housing being able to handle heat.
The waves are deep, and possibly deeper, but I want to see the data or a timelapse of decades. Statistical aberrations occur, so intense methods need to be used to determine if these events (jet stream waves) are outside of the statistical norm or not. The turbulent nature of the atmosphere makes it a bit difficult to actually assess.
Has anyone figured in the tilt of the change in the Earth's axis? Goes back & forth from around 24.2 - 23.8°. Has massive impact on glacial formation, moisture content of the Sahara (GreenSahara) etc.
Does Cycles happen over tens of thousands of years and it's currently going in a direction that would predict cooler weather in few tens of thousands of years so it's directionally wrong to predict as the cause of global warming
@@errol3184 I'm in Western Australia, and we are seeing all time record high temperatures. A couple of weeks ago we crack through 50C, while some places in the interior are seeing their annual rainfall in a day. The east coast is awash with unseasonal rain and low temps... I've noticed significant climate changes locally over the last 25 years...
@@Chris-hx3om worst part is that it doesn’t matter if all the first worlds can go green cause none of the third worlds & Chyna are giving up their sulfur-rich coal.
August 12, 1936 and June 28, 1994 - 120 degrees As crazy as it sounds, there are two dates that tie for the hottest day in Texas history. The heatwave of 1994 earned the most spots on this list, but the summer of 1936 is the earliest super-hot day in history. On August 12, 1936, Fort Worth and Seymour clocked in intimidating temperatures reaching 120 degrees.
I explained to my child (b. 2000) that when I was little (b. 1969), winter was steady cold for a good three months. You needed your coat every day without question. Summer was consistently hot. Autumn and spring were slow changes from one extreme to the other. Now, we get spells of seriously chilly nights in summer, very warm days in the dead of winter, chaos in spring and autumn. This is just the beginning. #GlobalWeirding.
We’ve been coming out of an ice age for about 10,000 years now and not finished. What happens in a single lifetime is insignificant and proof of NOTHING.
Yep. I took a photo of my front yard in Feb 1982 as a preteen, because I had never experienced a February day without any snow on the ground. It had warmed enough to melt the snow. We always had snow for the December holiday as a child. I have moved from the midwest (U.S.) to the New England area so it's hard to compare directly. But even over the years I've been here, we now don't get our first significant snowfall until mid to late January. And anecdotally, today will be 95F and tomorrow is supposed to be 68F.
I worked 300+ miles above the Arctic Circle in 2019. Ot was so hot some days the natives were getting heat stress. When I checked the annual rain fall ( I can't remember right now) that it was very low. That summer it rained in 4 months more than 4 years. I happen to be there when the researchers were presenting their data on climate. I took a picture of one of the slide presentations showing a heatwave close to the North Pole. The coast line was being eroded and falling into the ocean, permafrost included. When I was there I was watching the beluga whales migration from North to South. This is when the natives gauge their whaling season. Then 2 weeks later the beluga were heading North again. Then about 2-3 weeks later beluga were headed South again. The natives said they seemed confused. At this presentation one of the elders said the seasonal hunting has changed. Now, apparently because the water had warmed a specific bacteria is growing on shellfish which are giving the seal a disease where the natives can not make a fermented oil for food. Since I was there I wanted to get a Polar Bear certificate and jump in the Arctic Ocean. The natives said I was crazy. I ran and dove in and the water was cold but it actually felt like water around the Los Angeles area. What really struck me was the water was barely salty. It tasted more like fresh water. I was actually shocked. The only thing I could think about this was maybe because of all the rain and ice melting around the coastline made it this way. My experience there was nothing like I imagined, and the facts brought out by the researchers and natives made me realize that this weather change is a huge problem. This is unedited so my apologies if this is all over the place and if there a typos.
Most of that is correct but spring and autumn are seasons of extremes. They're known for the massive changes. Like in my town our average high plummets by almost 10 degrees in just 1 month. You have to have a lot of cold/hot extremes to have that happen. Though it also depends where you live. In PA fall and spring change very fast
I would be interested in how the earth's pole shift has on the weather effects as well. Since the earth is well overdue for the next polar shift, it would seem to me that such a process would totally redefine the earths weather patterns. Would you consider a video addressing this process and its anticipated weather effects?
M Douglas, It seems like they are not interested in your topic because it doesn't go with the narrative they have been diffusing all these years. I would love to see more about the earth's pole shift too but very few people are speaking about it. It's all about the elimination of fossil fuels. It's not even about science.
You have to read between the lines with these propaganda pieces. They are admitting the pole shift and it's effects but they HAVE TO blame "man" for the taxes.
Thank you. I say that because, in fact, we did have a pole shift 2 years ago. I watched my compass, one not connected to the net, dance east to west for several years. Then 2 years ago instead of pointing north, it pointed exactly in the opposite direction. Something in my 64 years I have never seen it do. It's funny you should mention the weather. In 1988, where I live, we experienced over 60 days of 90-degree heat. We normally only get 6 and it was also the driest summer I ever remember. The weather changed every ten years since then. This year, starting last fall, the weather pattern seems to have returned back to what it was before 1988.
In the midwest we have a very obvious difference in the weather. Winters are virtually non-existant and summers are more oppressive. 30 years ago we would get good sized snow storms now we get an inch here and there. The summers used to get really hot in August but now it happens in June sometimes may. Spring and autumn is non existent.
Once, the seasons in Chicago were pretty clear cut and stable. Now, anything goes. There is a noticeable humidity in the upper atmosphere, which manifests as this very thin haze. It is enough to interfere with stargazing. Looking at satellite weather maps, it looks like it's being generated from evaporation in the Arctic. The once-regular seasons seem to be about six weeks or so off, being either early or late. Throughout last year, we got to see that ridiculous "inversion" of the Jet Stream, where it was noticeably vertical (north and south) instead of horizontal. We are seeing cooler summers and warmer drier winters, with both having less precipitation than usual. However, we are still getting our "normal" extreme punches of severe highs and lows.
That's NOT humidity causing haze, it's dispersed aerosols & yes, that's what's causing the extreme weather. Things have been done without knowing what the long term effects would be. It's a man made disaster.
@@XD-te6vj reading and comprehension. They’re clearly stating that they’ve notice irregular weather patterns in Chicago. They didn’t say it affects global weather. I’ve noticed changes in Chicago too, we don’t have cold Decembers anymore, we had a couple of 60° days in December for a while now … not normal
Studies have also shown that the earths magnetosphere is weakening which also plays a huge role in jet stream behavior and sun activity has a role to play as well.
Where did you hear that the Earth's magnetosphere is affecting the jet stream. Please explain. It sounds like a crazy fun story. NASA.GOV There's no evidence that Earth's climate has been significantly impacted by the last three magnetic field excursions, nor by any excursion event within at least the last 2.8 million years.Aug 3, 2021
I live in Alabama. I USED to enjoy a good rain storm. Now I spend most of them sheltering from tornadoes. The number of them has DOUBLED in the last 20 years...we are in second place behind Kentucky for that.🌪
Increasing global temperature of course influences the wind and rainfall. Increasing average temperature means more evaporation, which means more water in the atmosphere. So heavier rainfall is to be expected. If a place is heated up more, the temperature the density of the air changes, differences in air density in different places leads to pressure, which is what causes wind.
Born and raised in Hawaii and having a deep background in big wave surfing and forecasting, Ive been watching the northern and southern Pacific jet streams regularly for many many years and have noticed the past 8 to 10 yrs the northern mid latitude jet has been crossing the equator below Hawaii just to the east very strong during the winter months. The hemispheres are intermingling and I know this is far from normal.There are a few other places on the planet that do this also but more pronounced in the central Pacific. Im no expert on climatology but from what I understand this is a major climate emergency that is being swept under the rug by the mainstream media.
You bet bro. Everything is fully distorted by media/government. Prepare yourself and your people for a cleansing of "supposed" biblical terms. The writting is on the wall, eyelashes are glued on good and cell phone fully charged.
Absolutely, the bee population here in the eastern US has been decimated over the last decade. The weather is not normal and no doubt that the powers that be have been manipulating our weather to the point that that the earth’s feed back loops are engaging on a scale never seen before in our lifetime. I am not an expert but I read a lot and pay attention to nature and our weather patterns.
Mainstream media does preciseley as they are told to do by governments, same as russia really. A good and thorough cleansing is required and inevitable.
Since the 1960's, rapid logging has had a tremendous impact on climate change in the PNW, from Northern CA to WA......... we would appreciate your investigative report on this topic. Chemical defoliants used on forests have poisoned the water and wildlife, humans included......
Well said! We need transparency and accountability from these huge corporations. People should be outraged by what these huge corporations are doing to our forests, not disclosing what they're spraying, when, where...it's actually horrifying!
The forests grow back very fast here in WA state my property was logged in the 1970s when the house was built but the Douglas fir trees are now full size some must be 130 feet tall or so.
I have to disagree with your assessment that the Pacific Northwest is getting wetter. I've lived here my entire life and it's getting drier, actually. I remember the rainy season lasting from Mid-October to Mid-June and now we're lucky if it rains before November and having it last to April. There's also a lot less rain fall during that time, as well. I accept that the jet stream is moving North, but I think you'll find that Portland, Oregon will have a climate similar to San Francisco within a few decades, while Juno, Alaska up to Anchorage will have milder climates, similar to those from Eugene to Vancouver, BC today.
It was an illogical assessment of the data they provided. Why would a greater variable in the jet stream focus moisture into one area and leave the other without anything? If anything it would mean periods of hot and dry followed by a dip which brings cooler and wet. But even that would only partially be out of the norm. That protected jet stream didn't leave the historical norms until 2040 range. And still had 90 percent in the historical norms range.
It is indeed overall drier in PNW. That said the intensity of of the rainfall is much higher before when the so-called atmospheric rivers hit the right spot. Definitely different from 5,10, 20 years ago when the rain was more consistent and regular but usually less intense.
Exactly. Way way more going on than they are telling. This is actually happening with our entire galaxy. If you know the Suspicious Observer channel, he covered this exact issue in a video of his about 3 months ago. Explained it like a scientist explains it. Really great channel if you don’t know it!
I remember several years ago an attempt was made to curb the winds of a hurricane. It did work to a certain extent. The contentious among the scientist was they were afraid that what they do would make the Hurricane worse. I really doubt that the Arctic is warming because every time a submarine surfaces in the Arctic there is always plenty of ice. Have you seen the Russian side of the Arctic, also plenty of ice and bitter COLD temp. Have you ever considered that the scientist who say it is melting are staying in DC offices because it is nice and warm and can easily go to Post Office to collect their Grant Checks.
YES, THE ARTIC MELT IS ALLOWING FRESH WATER TO GO INTO THE OCEAN, AND SLOW DOWN THE GULF STREAM, IF A LOT OF FRESH WATER GOES IN FROM MELTING, AND THE GULF STREAM STOPPES, THEN EUROPE WILL GET SEVERE FREEZES IN THE WINTER , THERE ARE TH-cam VIDEOS ON THE SUBJECT YOU CAN FIND
At 4:11 you show a jet stream over BC Canada. I live in the area that was affected in Kamloops and we hit 47C or 117F during this time. It set a record of 10F higher than any other recorded temperature here ever with the old record being 107F is about 42C. There were 5 consecutive days we were over the old record high. A neighboring town registered 49.8C or 121 F becoming the first temperature recorded in Canada ever of over 120F. Then in November in a time when we are supposed to be freezing we had road washouts and flooding in the mountains. 2021was an incredible year for the south of BC.
Last frost day where I live is may 5. Two days ago,may 22 , we had overnight temps that killed my garden and many of the flowers I had put out. Global warming? Save it for someone else.
This hits home for me because I'm from Atlanta and moved to Seattle last year. The heat wave over the summer here was horrendous and with no AC I had to jump in my cold shower to keep from going into to shock. In Atlanta my parents said the summer temp stayed in the 80s. Rain is normal in summer in the southeast but it was everyday.
Having a misting spray bottle (even the cheap ones that have at least a relatively fine mist) that you can spray your face, neck, arms, legs while walking (creating a breeze if the air is still), or while at home spraying toward a fan blowing the mist back on you, will help. I've had situations where doing this a few times per minute kept me relatively cool.
I'm from Oklahoma, and I began to see less and less precipitation, and more noticeably, less storms and tornados, so I looked for what the jet stream was doing. I was shocked at the change. States more north and east were getting more tornados but were not prepared like we were, with devastating effects. In the winter we are getting less precipitation, and more sunny temperate days. Everywhere on the planet is effected, and I heard recently that the Gulf Stream was also changing. We definitely live in auspicious times!
Same, I’m a Florida native who moved to Oklahoma City in about 2011 and I remember that there was a fair amount of rain in March, April and May when I moved here. Over the years, Thunderstorms started getting scarcer and scarcer. I’ve never seen my grass so brown this past summer. Also I noticed that the season are shifting to the “right” as in the cooler months are moving into May, June territory while the warmer months are in October and November. Crazy to see this right before my eyes in the span of a decade.
OK, this talks about the changing jet streams. Then they present a computer model that says we don't have to worry until 2060 or so. I am 70 years old. I have been aware of the threat of Climate Change since my high school science classes some 50 years ago. What I have noticed is that they keep saying some version of, "don't worry, it is still 20 years off." It used to be 2050, now it's 2060. The fact of the matter is that it is right now, not tomorrow. I live in Vancouver, B.C. 2021 gave us record breaking heat waves which killed a number of people and destroyed the sea life that lives in the tide pools. We also had record breaking forest fires. Then we had record breaking rain falls which caused enough flooding that we were quite literally cut off from the rest of Canada. Between bridges and roads being washed out and rail lines being destroyed the only way to have east west travel was to detour south down through the states. This caused gas rationing for a couple of weeks where people were limited to 30 liters of gas at a time. Then we had a record breaking cold snap around Christmas. But Climate Change is still way off in the future. Yea right. Wake up folks. We are being played. CC is here, now. Not 20 or 30 years in the future.
It always aways off. Just like they talk about staying under 1.5c but keep moving the baseline?? We're over 2c using the 1750 baseline. About to lose the Arctic ice and methane levels are starting to go vertical now The greatest short coming of the human race is our in ability to understand the exponential function- Al Bartlett
I did not really "get" the notion that the computer model says no worries, because, like you, I have been seeing the changes for decades. (born 1960) CC is here.
I am a couple of years older than you and have seen the same thing. I was in my forties before I ever saw a temperature over 100F. Now there are several a year. Last year, an Arctic blast came through, dropped the temp to -27 and killed fruit trees and grape vines that were forty years old. Prior to the 1970s, those winter temps were common.
I live in central California and our new issue is relentless high winds, mostly from N-NW. The new pattern over the past few years has been moderate winter rainfall, followed by weeks and sometimes months of constant drying winds that precede the late spring/ summer heat. Our vegetation is already bone dry by mid- May, making us vulnerable to the dry, summer heat. We are a tinder box from mid-May through November.
The cities in california create a heat plume in the atmosphere and this combined with the mountains changes the ocean winds and weather patterns. THAt is the biggest effect humans have in USA on weather. When californi failed forest mgmt causes fires, that too changes the weather for thre rest of the country and potentially world. "Global warming" is simply Liberalism run AMOK!
In so many of these documentary's, sadly nearly nothing is mentioned about the magnetic field weakening by 10% now, and magnetic north having drifted 24 degrees, at increasing spead. Logically this is the main factor.
I've lived in North Central/Central Iowa for all my life and I can tell you in my experiance the seasons have changed. 52 years ago it was common to have snow on the ground at Thanksgiving and there it was pretty common to have snow cover on the ground north of the I-80 corridor pretty much Nov.-early March. Winters were pretty cold with ice covered lakes and rivers that people ice fished on and snowmobiling was a popular past time. Since the 1980's winters have become warmer and the seasons seem off, as in fall lasts later into winter and winter into spring. Also springs have been wetter and cooler and July and August are not as hot and dry as they traditionally were.
I agree, I live up near Mason City and over the past 15-20 years the winters are not only warmer, but offset. Over the past 10 years, I've noticed the winters start out warmer (Nov-Dec) but the cold is hanging around longer into the spring. Plus the lack of actual snowfall. Most snowmobilers now must head farther north into Minnesota and Wisconsin to see some actually good snow. Just this last couple weeks, we have seen some incredible temperature differences, starting out with an overnight low of -21f to a high of 32f and then dropping back down that night to a low of -10f. We are definitely seeing more and more greater extremes. During the summer months growing up in the 70's and 80's, the summers were hot and dry with plenty of clear skies. Now the temps are somewhat lower due to months of smoky skies from the forest fires out west. Even though our day to day weather may not have changed much, I can definitely tell what our new climate normal is looking like.
@@IowaStrmChsr Yep. I grew up in the Ackley area so I know what you mean. Remember how late Feb-March used to be foggy, damp cloudy days as all the snow pack melted, we hardly have any of those days anymore. Then April and May would be on avarage a little dryer and everyone could get crops in. Now springs are usually pretty wet. And May and June used to be tornado time in Iowa, with hot humid days that would erupt in afternoon storms. The tornado counts in Iowa are WAY down. Then July and August would dry out and it would just be hot. Now we get more rain and the daytime highs have moderated somewhat.
..it's just flat out absolutely warmer across the board..your comments are describing somewhat micro climates..which don't exist.. ..long ago are the days where the nightine temps of Jan and Feb reach -20 to -30° below zero..maybe a few days here in there if even that...then long hotter summers of 80° to 100° for months into October ..the land is drying up and we can no longer be the world's breadbasket unless they want to pay exorbitant prices..like we do ..one thing we can say if our food is clean and not contaminated no we ith these endocrine disruptors..auto immune contagions..just stuff like lead cadmium chromium arsenic ..on n on..that other countries are infested with ..I would not eat as anything that's not grown in this country or Canada or even Australia..definitely not India china Indonesia Mexico...no de cc eloping nations ..DO NOT E AT FOOD NOT GROWM HERE..
There has been a great deal of published research regarding the impact on the Jet Stream in the Northern Hemisphere and the subsequent impacts, what about the Southern Hemisphere? Beyond the impacts of a changing Thermohaline circulation, what's happening (atmospherically) in the south?
I'll tell you straight up what is going on is directly related to current geomagnetic excursion. Not CO2. I ALMOST thought they were give full honestly here.
Some people would ask why we can't all just move north and follow the climate change? Well, it has taken thousands of years for nutrients to build up in our temperate climate soils. So, moving to where tundra and evergreen forests existed only a few decades earlier will mean many people will die from lack of water, and enough food.
What I want to know is how is the shifting poles are affecting the jet stream? Also think this has a big affect, that would also change some of the conclusions made hear!
I think you mean the axis which has been dipping & wobbling over the last 25 yrs & expected to possibly flip? Most scientists. Nobody knows what happens if the axis flips but the last time it did its suspected there was dramatic changes in climate that may have wiped out the Neanderthals.
I think it's inevitable for the global temperature to increase in the next 20yrs. We need to be moving faster with changing yet it's easier to adapt with the coming realities. I don't expect an impactful turn around until it's too late.
@@hosnimubarak8869 at the end of the ice age mutch more and wait... bigger spikes during the ice age. Same goes for it's start. Never expect nature to stay the same, after all it was physical and biological change that made us possible. Rather learn from the organisms that adapt instead of dying.
@@hendrickswart4122 Current atmospheric concentrations of CO2 are about 30% higher than they were about 150 years ago at the dawn of the industrial revolution. Before the industrial revolution, the CO2 content in the air remained quite steady for thousands of years. Natural CO2 is not static, however. It is generated by natural processes, and absorbed by others. But consider what happens when more CO2 is released from outside of the natural carbon cycle - by burning fossil fuels. Although our output of 51 gigatons of CO2 is tiny compared to the 750 gigatons moving through the carbon cycle each year, it adds up because the land and ocean cannot absorb all of the extra CO2. About 40% of this additional CO2 is absorbed. The rest remains in the atmosphere, and as a consequence, atmospheric CO2 is at its highest level in millions of years. (A natural change of 100ppm normally takes 5,000 to 20,000 years. The recent increase of has taken just 120 years). Meanwhile the average global temperature on Earth has increased by about 0.8° Celsius (1.4° Fahrenheit) since 1880. Two-thirds of the warming has occurred since 1975, at a rate of roughly 0.15-0.20°C per decade. This rate of recent warming is 10x that of the gradual warming that ended the last glacial period.
I'd be curious to hear more about adapting to climate change. In Holland the average height of land is *below* sea level. Since rising oceans are a clear problem, maybe we can learn from Holland's adaptation.
Or move. Y’all really think the governments would tell you if you’re gonna die. Nope. To them natural disasters do them a favor. You’re dead and they didn’t need another fake war to kill you.
Holland is small and wealthy, the world has a very long coastline and the majority of people are poor. The USA is $29 trillion in debt so you will have some trouble financing the Hollandization of North America.
@@sentientflower7891 who’s wealth is it? Not yours. You’re a useless eater to them. Why do whites identify with the elites? They don’t identify with you.
@@hiimelfo Also what makes them an "oil troll"? The comment didn't say what energy source is best, but you jump right to calling someone a Troll for simply stating facts! It's you who appears to be the Troll here
@@face.- nonsense. You and your other troll account are paid for by the oil companies. We get it. Troll on. Enjoy global methane levels hitting 1900.5ppb lol. Great outlook for life on earth lol 😆.
Why is it years ago all weather broadcasts included a jet stream map ? It is hard to even find one anymore and why is this information not being shared anymore ?
Because anyone who's observant enough to notice the usual weather patterns deviating drastically out of nowhere would be able to tell immediately that someone's been tampering with it and they REALLY don't want the lil kiddies catching on to their tricks. You can't sell climate change to the masses if the weather always behaves for you, so they gotta spice it up a bit. When nature disappoints, man intervenes. And climate change seems to be real profitable right now. Go green! 🙃
I'd like to hear about what research may be ongoing, to do with sea weather - there appears to be a strong connection between ocean currents and atmospheric activity, but have we learned anything more than that? And how is weather at sea going to affect things like global commerce - not just the fishing industry but also trade routes, shipping, even airplane routes? Another thing I'm interested in (though it might not fall under your umbrella, pun intended) - sometimes we kind of joke about "send your rain over here, we need it!" But is there really a way to DO that? Not steer the storms themselves - while that would be AWESOME, I am certain that it is not possible now and probably won't be for a long time - if ever. But maybe finding ways to catch the excess water from those wet regions that are getting even more flooded, and redistributing it, channeling it, to areas that aren't so flooded? I can't imagine it'd be something so simple as a massive, continent-spanning aqueduct system - but it would be interesting to know if anyone's exploring possibilities!
That’ll be a very important thing to do with the excessive amount of wasted water: The 21’st Century has to conform with what we are experiencing now and for future generations to come “!
I'm no meteorologist but I believe that the connection between ocean current and atmospheric activity has been understood for decades now. I remember in high school learning that there are oceanic factors and atmospheric factors which dictate the flow of ocean currents
If ancient Romans built an empire wide aqueduct system there no reason, ither than political will, that our civilization cannot build a country wide one.
I dream about this also. Why not a continental aqueduct? I bet it would be cheaper and achievable sooner than desalination plants on the scale we would need them.
I've lived in Colorado along the front range for about 40 years now. Back in the 80s, in the summer, every single day around noon or 1pm, we'd have a short rain shower. Within an hour, the ground would be dry. And we rarely made it out of the 80s (fahrenheit). Since about 2002 - we rarely get any rain in the summer (in my particular area). Temperatures spend a lot of time in the 90s and even into triple digits, which was unheard of in the 80s/90s. Currently, we last saw rain in (I believe) August and that was a relatively short shower that did nothing for the drought we are in. Climate change is real, no matter your political beliefs.
That is too short of a timeframe. I'm in California, and a megadrought lasting 400 years happened 1000 years ago, long before the modern era. Want to fight climate change? Support carbon-free nuclear power!
@@mayhemacres725 There are short term patterns hidden within broad and major changes. An example is the mega drought in Californis a thousand years ago, and the Little Ice Age in rhe 1600s. We cannot extrapolate from a few years when the history of the Earth is 3+ billion years.
@@scottslotterbeck3796 we're pumping CO2 into the atmosphere 10 times faster than the petm extinction event. We've experienced 10000 years of cc in less then 300 years and that's before we hit abrupt cc. Just wait till we have a icefree Arctic and methane levels go up exponentially
Ever heard of Otzi the ice man? He's a man that died 5000 year's ago in the Alps, where he remained until found in 1991, partially sticking out of the ice. He was found with all of his belongings which suggests to me that he died there at a time when that area was not covered in ice, but since the time of his death he was covered and the ice remained for 5000 years, now it's returning to a level of which Otzi might recognize.
@@Wirmish you really really need to do some research if you think the earth doesn't go thru natural climate cycles. Earth warmed after the last ice age right? The mammoths weren't driving Mercedes
This study leaves out the implications of Krakatoa in 536AD. This event was responsible for incredible droughts and wild weather patterns around the world.
Perhaps we should think about adaptation rather than mitigation. MOST of the greenhouse gases being emitted are coming from developing nations, and unless you want to ask people in more impoverished parts of the world to stop developing their economies and remain poor, realistically we are just not going to stop climate change even if we were to reduce emissions in the West to zero, which is also unrealistic. Rather than spending resources and hindering our economy with regulations and killing jobs that aren't "green" enough, we should be doing things like erecting sea walls, building giant aqueducts to get water from up north, and investing in desalination plants.
Well the developed countries are responsible for the vast majority of what has been emitted so far. Also all the emissions that are generated by developed countries due to their demand of products that are produced in developing nations are exclusively attributed to the footprint of these developing countries (which does not represent reality, obviously). So it is still very important for developed countries to cut their emissions. Of course you cannot and should not blame the developing countries for the strive to become fully developed and wealthy. In fact, we should support this. It does not have to go along with lots of emissions, however. If the incentives are suitable, developing countries can use green technology from the start and just skip the carbon Era - which also makes more sense in many cases as decentralized energy systems work best in a lot of scarcely populated areas. The same thing happened to telecommunications actually: in a lot of developing countries, mobile phones are a normal thing although they never might have had a landline before. It is just a lot easier to provide radio signal coverage than to dig thousands of kilometers of landlines...
@@midgekiller2151 Well, removing the carbon and other greenhouse gases that have already been emitted is not realistic at any scale that would actually have an impact, and yes it stands to reason that the emissions that are already in the atmosphere were produced primarily by the West. Also, the demand for products produced in developing nations is benefiting them just as much as it is benefiting the industrialized nations, so it isn't fair to blame the West either. Not to mention that we simply are not at a point where renewables can fulfill the energy needs of a modern civilization. Not to mention that producing solar panels and wind turbines is not without its own contribution to atmospheric carbon, as well as environmental pollution required to mine the materials. No, in the developing world they are building coal plants, because that is the most efficient and cost effective way to meet the power demands they require, no matter how bad it is for the environment. Not to mention that the developing world has more population and dense population centers of its own, so we are not exclusively talking about scarcely populated areas, far from it. China, who is currently the top emissions producer, has 113 cities with over one million population as of today. The population of the developing world is also expected to increase more rapidly than in the West where the population is either stagnant or shrinking. At the end of the day it is simply too late and unrealistic to stop climate change. It's happening. Making it so poor people can't drive to work in the US by banning gasoline powered cars that working class people can actually afford won't fix it. Causing brownouts and blackouts by closing down fossil fuel based power plants (and NUCLEAR, if you actually care about emissions we should be pushing nuclear because that actually CAN power a modern civilization, easily, and its ill effects are still FAR less than that of fossil fuel plants) won't fix it. The thing we CAN do is what humans are great at doing and have been already doing since we first walked the plains of Africa hundreds of thousands of years ago - adaptation. Sea walls, creating drought tolerant crops, creating technology to bring water to places, THAT is a much cheaper and more feasible solution that also won't screw the world's poor any more than they already are in the process.
For all those interested in actual science, read about Magnetic Excursion Events. Severe climate changes occur cyclically. Gothenburg (12,000 years ago), Lake Mungo (24,000 years ago), Mono Lake (36,000 years ago), Leschamp (46,000 years ago). These events caused massive die-offs and changes in fauna, flora, shores, deserts, etc. Humans cause pollution, but our effect on climate change is minimal. So get ready for a wild ride, cause the climate changes we’re seeing are just the beginning.
With respect, all the climate change comparisons between this and other cycles is that the human impact has made ALL of these changes in this cycle bigger and more widespread. Further, all the big shifts and events you mention happened well before the worldwide spread of humans and our near- worldwide fossil fuel consumption. There is no valid comparison, just that wild ride you mentioned.
@@eric2500 I know what you mean, but we're talking about different things. As the media says, in the last 200 years, climate is changing due to us, but this is noly true if you look the last 200 years, which is biased. If you look further, this warming up was expected to happen (as part of the 12,000 cycle) and will worsen severely (those 12,000 year cycles had major climate catastrophes, geographical changes and global fauna extintions). Even if we had done zero pollution, the climate would be changing and the cycle would occur. An additional note, this Magnetic Excursion affects the entire solar system and this was show by the many climate and magnetic field changes on all planets in our solar system.
As a Texan I’ve only seen snow 2 in my life. This past year I’ve seen it 3 times!!!
Living in Canada, we've been seeing the changes for a long time. Over 20 years ago I noticed that in my city (east of the Great Lakes) we didn't get winter days where your nostrils stick together anymore. Winters also began being more humid because the lakes don't freeze solid as they used to. The seaway canal rarely freezes now. And last week we had a visit from the Polar Vortex which allowed us to break records that date back to the 1930's (it was -32°C plus wind chill). We're not supposed to get the Polar Vortex because the Jet Stream normally protects us from arctic air. And this is just the start...
I think that's why "climate change" is the prefer term over "global warming" because yes while the world is warming at a fast rate, it's more complicated when you view it at a more local level.
@@devinsmith4790 just my opinion, but I dislike the focus on calling it "climate change" alone. It should be, "rapid climate change caused by global warming". The climate is always changing, usually at a much slower pace, but simply saying "climate change" is not specific enough to describe what is actually happening. It also takes focus away from greenhouse gas emissions, which directly contribute to global warming. Just because the weather is colder than usual for a couple weeks doesn't change the fact that greenhouse gas emissions are causing the atmosphere to retain more heat from the sun.
@@devinsmith4790 it’s also not what they’re telling you. How many times do they have to change the narrative and you think it’s “new science.” Almost everything that the public knows has been researched for decades, and then the narrative is spun by centers of power to fit their agenda. Watch them tell you that they need to save you.
@@_ch1psetlmao how do you know? Were you there? Keep an open mind and be open to new info. Stop trying to fit things into existing theories. That’s not science.
@@_ch1pset
If you want a term that's less of a mouthful, there's "anthropogenic climate change".
Growing up up in the 70s and 80s. I can see a massive difference from then till now.. it's not the same anymore. You knew what to expect as the seasons rolled in years ago. Not no more ...it's nuts...
Weather engineering isn’t a conspiracy theory; it’s a FACT! Climate Change isn’t from humans using fossil fuels - it’s from wealthy globalists trying to play god- to cause chaos, fear and death, as usual! privatized Aerospace and Advanced Technologies have no Congressional oversight, no checks & balances. So what we get are parasitic, dim witted psychopaths sabotaging our world. They gotta go. They are outright narcissistic, self serving lunatics. Just ask the natives of Lahaina, on Maui- They have too much power! You don’t let someone with the awareness of a toddler drive your car do you?
Some powers that be - are corrupted, depraved, and opened themselves to being possessed, due to their lack of spiritual empathy and their self serving, power hungry lust to control e Euronext and everything! When will they ever learn???
I'm not an expert but I know that one cubic meter of water can heat three thousand cubic meters of air to the same temperature, so ocean currents must play a big part in weather patterns because the air above the sea gets heated or cooled by these currents, maybe you guys should make video about that, it sure would be interesting to know more about this concept.
I have seem documentaries about ocean currents. Not certain if this channel has made them yet. even more terrifying...
@@johnnyrebel3340 no
@@johnnyrebel3340 um, what you said is like the opposite of what's happening in this episode, in which they're examining how different forces are interacting with each other. you so brainwashed you just spend all your time remembering what you heard on fox instead of paying attention to what you're watching?
Correct, you're not an expert.
For every degree C the atmosphere heats it can hold 7 % more moisture
I live in south Tennessee in the United States. We've been hit by an unprecedented amount of tornadoes and flooding. When I bought my house, which is over 100 years old, I asked the previous owners (a church who had it built for their ministers) about flooding in the area and if it was necessary to buy flooding insurance. They told me they had only seen the back field flood once since the 60s. I was not in a flood zone either even though we have a small creek about a quarter of a mile behind us. Needless to say in the past 14 years I've lived here that creek has flooded our back field nearly to our back door at least twice a year in the past 5 years. Additionally, we are having a pretty bad mold problem in the area even in newer housing and people are seeing a pretty large amount of floor rot due to moisture. 100 year old farm house which is JUST now seeing the floor rot out due to moisture, well that says something. Never mind the animal migrations. Mountain lions and bears coming south while armadillos are coming up from Mexico. Nature speaks for itself if you listen. You may not agree with the human impact on climate change, but you'd be a fool not to agree that we are seeing change for what ever reason.
you are a wise person, Heather. Thanks for the news from Tennessee. Where I live in the PNW next to the ocean with a great deal of rain, we are also seeing 100 year floods as rain falls on the large Cascade volcanoes instead of snow and/or heat waves (like the one mentioned in the video) melt snow and glaciers so quickly, the rivers rise to levels not seen in decades and spill over the banks into farmland that was drained in the 1920s or 40s (much to the chagrin of the Native Americans who used those waterways in their lifestyle). Highways were destroyed in the interior parts of British Columbia, cutting off communities from supplies. Some towns like Hope required food to be helicoptered in. It was very frightening and likely our biggest risk up here.
You're right, I don't agree with the narrative that climate change is human driven. But there's far worse to worry about, such as the coming pole flip.
It's call harp
@@mickeycabrera325 thats Haarp, to be sure. But it has nothing to do with the coming pole shift.
@@mickeycabrera325 I'm more for the pole shift idea rather than HAARP if we are going down rabbit holes.
Resident of western Oregon here, at ground zero for last year's Pacific Northwest heat dome. This science is vital to me, and I heartily encourage you to keep up this coverage. Thank you!
Just get an air conditioner & not worry about it. Probably would just use it a week or so a year.
Check out Paul Beckwith, you will learn all about the shifting jet stream.
@@ricecakeboii94 we already send energy to power California’s ac
@@darthmaul216 And California wants more water from us. I say we should just get more AC here & send less power there.
You want to hear something totally weird about Portlands heat dome last summer? I was committed to be fishing all 3 days just barely north from the Ridgefield WA boat ramp. We thought we were in for a terrible time but a marine layer moved in for the whole time and protected us as well as the fishing. We hardly caught a sweat and caught limits. Blown away!
This is interesting. I knew things were changing in the early 1990's because the local lake I would go ice fishing on was freezing up less and less. Being a gardener, I also noticed that my growing season was shifting, some years I could plant a little earlier. It was erratic of course, but general trend was tending toward a shift in my frost zone.
@laughing Atyou what a catty response hahaha you must be reallllly smarty. Praises
I had annuals planted outside Spring 2021. They never died back. It wasn't cold enough. South USA. Blooming their heads off right now! Spring 2022.
@laughing Atyou Great advice to Robert Coplin, dear heart, perhaps you should follow it? First off, it's 'Milankovitch cycle', but we'll keep that between just the two of us. Anyway, Milutin Milankovitch hypothesized the long-term, collective effects of changes in Earth’s position relative to the Sun are a strong driver of Earth’s long-term climate, and are responsible for triggering the beginning and end of glaciation periods. The Milankovitch cycles include orbital eccentricity (100,000 yr. cycle), obliquity (41,000 yr. cycle) and precession (25,771.5 yr. cycle), which are all pretty long-term and don't go very far toward explaining why Robert's forsythia are now blooming in January. As a gardener in Michigan, I've noticed a similar trend over the past 10 years or so. It also doesn't explain observed changes in the migratory and nesting patterns of birds, along with a host of other phenomena. Finally, the idea of Milankovitch cycles being responsible for our current unprecedented episode of warming and climate change is so thoroughly discredited you should be kind of ashamed of yourself for even mentioning it.
@laughing Atyou Really? You can't even SPELL it and you feel entitled to say that to someone? What a healthy self-esteem you have, bless your heart.
I've had to plant later and later each year and spring takes more time to arrive. If the earth is really warming as the so called experts want us to believe, why are we experiencing colder temperatures? 7 degrees cooler than normal......I suppose theyre gonna tell me that's due to global warming too 😆😅🤣🤣🤣😂
Living in Indiana means the Jet Steam passes over us many times a year. This is why our weather is so erratic. We can have 30+ degree swings in the same week and sometimes the same day. Not to mention the extremes of having snow, rain, and then heat waves all in one day or the same week. It is wild
YES, I LIVED THERE AS WELL, BUT FROM CHICAGO , MOVED TO FLORIDA AFTER THE BIG SNOW OF 1979
I miss the indy ice storms. We have them in Ohio but not to the degree, dangerously beautiful extreme my old Indiana home has
you are right I live in Ohio and we laugh looking at the weather forecast the temperature goes up and down in throughout 1 week and does it continuously up and down every week, we ride a teetered totter up and down!
The lake near by parents house doesn't freeze much at all anymore.
During the cold weather during La Nina, we seem to get monsoon like fall- winter near New Years. Floods my parents basement it seems every time. People deny this, but heavens, just pay attention.
people deny your parents basement getting flooded?
@@brianbailey462 Heh. But even though it didn't happen 10-35 years ago doesn't mean climate change or global warming... oh no, it just means... pigeons or something.
PLEASE LEARN THE TRUTH>>>IT IS OUR GOVERNMENT DOING IT FOR 100 YEARS! WE MUST STOP THEM
th-cam.com/video/5yZhh2leRJA/w-d-xo.html
@@Thessalin deny deny deny
Right now the north of Mexico is suffering from a massive drought that has extended for far too long. We had songs about the rains of May, the massive migrations of butterflies in spring, and the cool nights of June. Now it all has changed, insects are almost non-existent, it only rained in may for four days instead of heavy rainfall for at least a week. The nights since April are at least 28°C and May started with 45° days. We haven't even reached the peak of Summer.
The climate is changing, those who ignore it literally never go out of their house and pay attention to the bigger picture. My city is experiencing a changing climate like no other, and we are not prepared for the drought to last more than a month.
Yes and in a couple years we will be having floods! The sun runs our climate so it depends on what it's doing!
@@kirkkirkland7244 Axial Precession has a bigger effect than the sun or man.
The American dust bowl of the Southwest was not due to CO-2 forcing. Climate changes do occur naturally as well as extreme weather events. It is normal to experience extreme weather and more than normal record setting cold or heat events within one to several years or decades. The record shows this.. ie: the east coast USA mini "ice age" of the mid 1800's... the European millennial warming period, etc.
@@TheFRiNgEguitars It was due to shitty farming techniques....not climate change...
@@mrrooster4876 It was the perfect storm, severe drought, and poor soil management, the great depression and the need to plow more land to break even. Take away any of these factors, no dust bowl... severe drought is significant, if not the primary cause.
About 25 years ago I heard a scientist say that we have had about 150 years of unusually good weather and we should prepare for it going back to normal. I've always wondered how bad normal was. Guess I'm getting a good look at that normal lately
I've lived where I live my whole life. The weather was way worse when I was a kid. Not just because I was a kid and it, "seemed" that way. We used to be able to jump off the roof into snowbanks, go tubing down drainage ditch chutes etc. It's nothing like that now. Just dustings of snow, a rare blizzard or two that's gone in a day or two, and then evaporated and drained out within a week.
@Buck Rothschild ..but the underlying question in all this is "Is it man made" or just a passing phase ? remember our life spans are just a quick flash in the scheme of things...
@@vincentl.9469 A question that has been answered over and over again. The only people with doubts are the people selling fossil fuels and they are spending billions on politicians and focus groups telling folk that it's not a sure thing . Meanwhile pretty every single scientists says it is man made and can present thousands of papers with the proof.
@@vincentl.9469 Ice age coming the historic data is crystal clear, perfectly natural
it’s gonna get wild and bill gates is gonna blame it on you and me but I don’t care I’ll be ice fishing like mad 🎉
So youve lived where youve lived cool
Dumb post with no location sounds like your not truthful
I remember being a kid in California and we would have rainy days and thunderstorms, now that rarely happens
California is currently in a new megadrought which is why it hasn't been raining there for the past 22 years. The last megadrought in the western US was about 500 years ago and lasted a very very long time. I don't expect it to end for a long time. Of course climate change is playing a role in making these megadroughts worse than their predecessors
Yup, growing up in the SF Bay Area during the 80's and 90's, it used to rain throughout winter and the skies were always grey. Now it looks more like a semi desert in winter with blue skies and hills covered in dried grass and shrubs.
Looking at the latest GFS run, this didn’t age well.
Well there you go then have a bunch of rain
Oh, it’s happening now!! We’re making up for at least the last 3 years I hope.
Gonna be a bit wild if we have a quick melt.
It’s time folks with houses get subsidized water tanks. I have a friend with two. It supports her garden and more 🪴
Here in New Zealand's North Island's Waikato region, my personal experience over the last 54 years, is that our average climate has warmed. Our cold months in 1965 were from May to August, when we had frequent, frosty mornings. Now we don't really experience frosts that much and our Winter has shrunk to half of June and the month of July and what rare frosts we have, are almost a non event. Our Summer's are becoming extended and hotter. We are having more days up in the high 20's, low 30's now, than we did 50 years ago and rainfall seems to be more spasmodic and less. In the 60's, I would quite often wear a heavy coat ,scarf and gloves in the Winter. In the last few years I just put on a Jersey and haven't worn my heavy coat once during the very mild Winter's we've had. If this trend continues, I feel we will become frost free like the far North region of the North Island.
Your Aussie cousins here.
Do you find it difficult to find similar information about the Southern Hemisphere?
It's all connected, but they appear to be looking at only half of the information.
Is it just me?
I'm in QLD Australia in now. But growing up in England is was used to seeing hard frost in the winter, cold winds and actually quite dry after the storm season in October and November. But from my teens until I moved to Aus we found that we hard mild winters that brought more rain and warmer weather. That's in my time growing up, only 29 years.
@@yt.personal.identification One aspect probably is that more of Earth's landmass and population both are in the northern hemisphere - but let's not miss that most countries at or south of the equator were colonized by Europe, and still deal with the aftermath. The money and resources for this research is concentrated up north.
That said, the impact of the Antarctic continent and the South Sea on the south jet streams would be very interesting to know about.
@@autochton Sure, but as the data appears to be mostly from satellites, then it suggests the data is available, but just not as 'popular' to analyse.
I imagine someone somewhere is working with the data.
@@yt.personal.identification It's the same with astronomy. They always concentrate on the Northern Hemisphere. We've always been considered to be slightly less important in the scheme of things. We're rarely mentioned on International news channel's
As a guy living in southern California, I can safely say that clouds are the stuff of legend
This is such a good program for the average person who doesn’t have the time to study the problems our Earth is experiencing. Plz share 😻
In New England winter is coming later over the last five years and it's staying longer with snow (sometimes) as late as May.
Even if you think you don't need air conditioning where you live, you could still get a freak event like in the Pacific northwest in late June 2021. Then being able to cool the air in your house could become a matter of life or death. So get an air conditioning unit and have it ready in case of an emergency.
My home area in Germany was flooded last summer, and the amounts of rainfall were completely unprecedented. About 100 People lost their lives when their houses were swept away. It was really chilling to watch it unfold from afar (I live in California and saw it happen on youtube), especially because I am so familiar with the region. This was a wake-up moment for me. Making the public aware of this is absolutely important. Keep up the good work!
Unprecedented?
The flood disasters of 1804 and 1910. What was probably the most catastrophic flood event in recent history hit the villages along the Ahr already at a "CO 2-free" time in 1804.
THIS IS THE REASON FOR THE WEATHER CHAOS AROUND THE WORLD th-cam.com/video/V2decDcEJqo/w-d-xo.html
@Sam Bourgeois No, it won't be more interesting to you because you'll stick your fingers in your ears and stomp your feet like a child.
Not true. You had disastrous flooding 100 years ago.
@Paul M Yet the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere will lead to an ice-free Earth in 500 years if left unchecked. Not an existential event for humans, but certainly less hospitable. There is no downside to more nuclear power plants, solar and geothermal.
About 30 years ago our local weather guy used to tell us that as new developments (housing,apartments,industry..etc) was being build out from the cities on wetlands,farmland and grassland..that eventually it would create a heat island affect…either causing droughts or really bad weather…I do notice now that our region has expanded 20 to 30 miles out from our large city..that storms coming our way either disappears or intensifies..no longer do we have the all day rains of the past…just a observation.
Heat islands are real but insufficient to cause this global warming. 39 billion metric tons of CO2-every year-is.
We won't be satisfied until the entire planet is paved in concrete or black asphalt.......
I was just thinking the same thing. It used to rain all day but now it only rains for a few hours
On SW Long Island, downwind of NYC and NJ, I routinely track rainstorms which have big impact upstream of the city,
and then often rain on the city, but generally now we just watch dessicated mammatus clouds glide overhead ... the trend is not novel, but has become exaggerated in past 30 years.
I am in Nebraska. I have been noticing such weird changes in weather. When the Tennessee/Kentucky tornados hit in mid-December we got 80 degree weather and severe thunderstorms. It was so weird considering the fact that we had snow two days earlier. Another thing is we barely get tornados or severe weather in the springtime, now we see the south getting hit much more. Now Nebraska is getting derechos. We had two severe straight line winds go up to Iowa in just two years. Its worrying.
Probably just a liberal propaganda
Chalk it up to high tech, high energy weather machines that can both heat and cool the atmosphere. Nothing new, they've been around for decades it's just that ppl in positions of authority are becoming real control freaks these days.
There are many factors affecting the climate. Every year 14.6 BILLION gallons of fuel are evaporated into the atmosphere just filling our tanks with fuel worldwide. The fluorocarbons released into the atmosphere in the 20th century are finally dissipating, reflecting less light from the sun. The coal and other fossil fuel soot stored in the northern ice pacts over the last 500 years are causing the ice to melt faster than we predicted. Permafrost is releasing billions of metric tons of methane into the atmosphere every month. That is only some of the things we have going on, there are many more. An old proverb says, "The wise one sees the calamity and avoids it." We all should learn to be wise; we will need it in the near future.
@@rnedlo9909
Don't worry Bill Gates has a plan to spray particles into the atmosphere that will block the sun's rays and cool the earth.
Also wonder if the light from sun is getting thru more............Why are there ANY areas of the globe experiencing record cold temperatures, which some are? Seems rational worldwide, that it would only be hotter on a continual basis.
Climate change is a hoax
I talked to a friend of ours last year, who turned 99, if she notices the weather being different now than when she was little, in the 1920's. She said, "absolutely, there's no question the weather is different, we used to get much more snow in the winter and much more rain, in the summer monsoon season, here in Flagstaff, AZ." It's great to listen to scientists but listening to someone who's 100 years old, is pretty enlightening. We're planning to move away from the southwest U.S., it's too dry and getting hotter, every year.
Hell, you don't even need to be that old. I'm in Canada and during the period of 2010 - 2020, six out out of those ten Christmases have been green or with barely a light dusting of snow.
Back in the 90's, the first snowfall being in October was common enough that our Halloween costumes had to be large enough to fit over our snowsuits.
There is no such thing as stable climate on Earth, century to century the climate is typically different, it was once warm enough to farm in Greenland and grow quality vineyards in England, some ancient coastal cities are over a km away from the coast now, others are completely under water, we've always known the oceans levels change over time. Climate change is a fact, you can't stop the natural progression of the Earth, climate change has wiped out many civilizations throughout history. Still we can't assume human activity and greenhouse gasses won't make climate change worse, cities with only electric cars will have much better air to breath, you shouldn't need to be tricked by climate change rhetoric to do the right thing...
Lived in Oregon my entire life. I hate that this hot patch is sitting over the PNW and keeping it dry and hot and not rainy and foggy and diverse climate with temperate rainforest type ecosystem... I hate warm muggy dry weather.. things really have been very different lately. That huge fire evacuated so many towns around where I live and where people I know live. People lost their homes. We've not seen stuff like that my entire life. I was born in '89.
i moved back to oregon from michigan to escape the muggy summers and chilling winters just to have my neighborhood burn down and have a muggy summer afterwards. It's so different now. First a huge fire and then this winter we got snow that lasted TWO DAYS ON THE GROUND only 8 miles inland from the ocean.
I miss the hotsprings the most. The fires were so terrible and some forest roads will be closed for 5 years.
@@AdvEug I haven't gotten to go to any of the hot springs. We're any of them affected by the fires? 😬
Support carbon-free nuclear power.
And a moratorium on immigration. In 1950, pop of USA was 150 million. It has more than doubled to 335 million, in 70 years!!! Unsustainable!
@@scottslotterbeck3796 and then when civilization collapses, then what?
It's getting less and less wild where I am. Not only does it not snow anymore, it's not even below 0 overnight.
Great presentation
When I was 3 years old , the snow was knee deep . 60 years later just above the ankle only !
When i was a kid the clouds were always very high in the sky.. now there are days that the clouds seem barely above the trees..i noticed this a few years ago and all jetss that flew over head had two contrails that dissipated.. more they get long and wide enough to cover the sky.. are all these things connected?
G V W W umm maybe the snow is at your ankle and not your knee is because you’re taller than you were when you were 3?
Hahahahaha
Back in the 1970's when picking plants for the yard I was told that temperature range was moving to the north. No one was in tuned to climate change. This was simply observations that were made at green houses. We now have a reason for these observations.
If we hold up the Texas freeze wave of February 2021 as an example of jet stream change due to anthropomorphic climate change, how do we explain that it has happened before, previous to the industrial revolution? How do we explain the Western fires of 1910, when TEN million acres of forest land burned in THREE DAYS? How do we explain the single biggest human loss of life due to a hurricane in Galveston in 1905, long before we began emitting CO2 into the atmosphere at industrial revolution levels?
Is there a chance this is all cyclical, and we as humans have nothing to do with it? Is that possibility getting millions in grant money for studies? If not, why not?
I do believe humans have a lot to do with climate change but it is worth investigating other factors. Anyone who goes on about "scientific consensus" is not really talking scientifically, consensus means nothing when it comes to science because truth is not a democracy. Science is always supposed to be questioned, it is never "settled". In fact there have been loads of times where the consensus among the educated was completely incorrect, going all the way back to antiquity. In fact pretty much everything we believe today was once a theory that was ridiculed by the educated at the time of discovery. Heliocentrism, evolution, germ theory, plate tectonics, I could go on.
Western forest fires - maybe the incredible extent of logging which used steam powered equipment and fire shutdowns weren’t a thing? I lived in the Pacific Northwest in logging country and safety wasn’t a concern until the 60’s. As for the Galveston hurricane, large weather events and poor weather forecasting are a deadly mix.
As far as I’ve seen, the people working on climate issues are NOT getting rich. I can’t say that about the owners of coal companies and oil corporations.
@@briangarrow448 There was steam and hydro at saw mills, but in the woods it was all done by hand. The 1910 fire (AKA The Big Burn) was a part of a regular cycle of fire in the West that was interrupted by human interaction, and the policy of dousing every single fire for decades. We are now reaping the benefits of overgrown forests.
The Galveston storm was forecast, but ignored by officials and civilians. But the storm was absolutely massive, before we gave them names and tags of fear. And before Industrial revolution pollution.
People directly working on studying anthropomorphic climate change are not getting rich, but the amount of money spent is ever-expanding. The paper pushers and non-profit CEO's getting the grants are doing just fine. How many gov't studies are looking into my original question, or have results that might lean that way? If they exist, why does PBS not present that info?
@@corey6393 Trees we’re cut by hand. They were moved by steam donkeys and then rail or log rafts or splash dams. The Big Burn was started by lightning if I remember correctly.
Do you have any supporting data that backs up your claims about paper pushers and environmental CEO’s blossoming across the country? I’m curious because I have volunteered in employment support programs and frankly, that’s not a massively growing field for potential jobs. Maybe the job market has changed since I retired.
@@briangarrow448 Yes, the Big Burn was started by lightning, but what environmental impacts created the situation? Were they human caused? It was a single largest acreage burned on record in this country, and it happened before the current climate change freakout. But it was over 100 years ago, and it didn't happen in California, so it has been forgotten.
I don't have a pile of papers sitting around to prove claims, I just watch, read, and listen. On a small scale, I have an example of local watchdog groups getting grants and funding to pass laws, and require training and fees for stormwater runoff protection. I have been through the training and paid the fees. I have performed the mitigation processes on jobsites. And not once was any of this site work actually inspected by those in the group. They take the money up front, and never follow up.
I know that is not specifically about climate change, but it is about ecological protection. The leaders of that particular group live better lifestyles than those they train, and never get their hands dirty.
Also, here in Southern California, this Winter has been the coldest average temperature in my memory, and we hardly got any rain (again). It's still relatively "subtle" but the fires speak for themselves.
Fires are at a multi decade low.
In spite of all the recent focus on the California forest fire tragedies and contrary to most public pronouncement, forest fires in his state are declining with the rest of the northern hemisphere. The United States Geological Survey’s fire scientist Jon Keeley checked the data for California back to 1920 and found that the number of forest fires peaked in the 1970s with a significant decrease since.
I can't post the link because if I do TH-cam deletes the post. The more facts I post the better the odds of deletion.
Reminder: disinformation is only that which doesn't fit the narrative that the ruling masters are forcing you to believe in.
@Mark Berryhill Here in Australia we are pretty much aware of the effects of climate change and the causes, although it would be good to include the other half of the world.We suffered what we now call the "Black Summer". We choked on the Eastern Seaboard from Southern Queensland down for months. We have bushfires here, in fact our Forests have evolved to account for it but NOT that extensive and that intense. "The Climate scientists predicated Australia would be the first to feel the effects of climate change and its increasing severity. They were right. However, like every where around the Globe, where ever there is a Conservative government, there is little or no action. At the hight of the conflagration, our Prime Minister snuck out of Australia and went to Hawaii.He was pilloried for it and our own Shock jocks tried but failed to put a positive spin on it. Our PM and his government is STILL in denial , taken kicking and grumbling to the Paris agreements. Here we are talking about science and then politics sneaks in, so desperate are they to prop up the existing order and ideology. Houses on the east coast are being washed into the rising seas with every severe storm. Mild dry winters and either intense dry heat or tropical humidity summers, where it shouldn't be. That is our reality now and this in only 20 years. I think the scientists projected time for change is overly optimistic. They should shave 20 to 30 years off their future projections on the ill effect of severe climate change.
No. The fires are poor forest management. We suppress fires in every case, leaving more and more downed trees to add to the fuel load.
@@scottslotterbeck3796 California doesn't even do forest management to prevent fires anymore. It's not really that it's poor, it no longer exists.
Fires have happened all the time; the only difference is the amount of people now living in fire-prone areas. Same with the water supply in the Colorado River basin; the water supply hasn't changed over centuries, only the demand.
This is one of the best and most simplest explanation that I’ve seen on the changes in the jet stream. My husband and I have actually been watching Al Roker on the Today Show for the last 20 years, and I have noticed a change in the Jet Stream because again I’m a faithful Weather Watcher. And so I was not surprised to see you say these changes of the last 20 years because I have to. Thanks so much.
YES, I ALWAYS WATCH HIM, AND NOTICED THE SAME THING
Once the entire planet was frozen if not a few times. Once the entire planet was warmer and no polar ice caps. There's even times where the magnetic North and South shifted. The sun is sometimes generating more or less energy. Climate changes have happened for 4.5 billion plus years...
History is fascinating and tends to repeat.
Pumping CO2 into the atmosphere 10 times faster than the petm extinction event. What's the worst that could happen?
@@Jc-ms5vv The great oxidation extinction due to excessive oxygen. And yes there's been more carbon in the atmosphere as well...
Nailed it! The Climate is not a static phenomenom. It changes! Iceland once had no snow or ice and farmers grew grain in Greenland. Avocados and Fica trees once grew in the Brooks Range in Alaska. More recently, the same plants grew in northern Idaho. Point is, Climate changes. Adapt or perish.
@@hardrockminer-50 good luck adapting to a dead lifeless planet
@@hardrockminer-50 what fairytales have you been swallowing? Farmers grew grain in greenland? wtf?
I just saw the weirdest weather for the time of the year! Today is November 27 and we just had a massive thunderstorm system move through the area. It was moving about 70 mph I estimated. I wish that I could show photos of it from my weather app.
Maya, you and your team have sharpened your presentations, increasing your impact.
Maya, you from Phoenix or nearby? Another reference in your presentation to the Valley of the Sun. I'm in S AZ.
Thank you, Steve!
This is the first time I've seen this channel, so the algorithm is speaking.
@@austinp.5024 mmm idk though. I thought she was low key trolling the corporate farming industry as cows are a HUGE source of greenhouse gases but they are nearly impossible to get in check because we all love our burgers and steaks and there’s really no such thing as successful small family farms anymore. It’s all corporate now. Lobbyists see to it that they are untouchable in every way. No one wants to give up meat even for a single day per week.
I’m guilty of it too so don’t @ me. I love beef. I love bacon. I’m just sayin why I think she’s wearing that cow print.
Cloud seeding has been going on around the world since 1953. Not only can this be done as warfare but also for corporate advantages. no mention of this, nor any mention of the cooling from 1941 t0 1978
Do a story on the “Aerosol Masking Effect”
The X lines facing the west on sundown
@@DavidKcPrice
so you can't see our binairy sun.
They do not want us to know our realm!!!
@@martinnielsen5851 also- sun color & position... and magnetic shifts... 🤔🤔🤔
Chemtrails FACT NOT FICTION
@@chrisbennett7039 lol it’s not Chemtrails it’s “cloud seeding” that is real. That’s a fun rabbit hole to fall fkr
I would be interested in knowing exactly what different countries are doing about this issue and how each individual can help. I feel that some countries are more concerned about invading other countries rather than actually preserving the world we live in.
Not sure what the point of invading a breadbasket like Ukraine is, if they’re just going to end up growing oranges in Siberia
@@UmmYeahOk think about the power of money! Russia is nothing more than an old gas station, but as has been reported putin is one of, if not the richest men in the world. He did not become that without pilfering the Russian peoples resources along with his oligarch buddies. With the encroachment of NATO after they gave up east Germany the deal was that no more would join NATO. Now that many have, and the history of Russian treatment of thieving dictators once out of power putin is naturally worried as he is without a doubt been the biggest thief Russia has ever had! Keep in mind that Ukraine is not just a bread basket, it has become a manufacturer in great demand for their educated skilled work force especially for automotive wiring harnesses. Then there is the topography, as there is nothing but plains between Western Europe and Moscow in fact Ukraine goes even further east than Moscow. Just seeing how putin meets with his closest people, generals and political underlings, at those insanely long tables, the man is obviously becoming more and more unstable in his fear of being assassinated.
They do the opposite of the USA!
We cant do shit, this planet has always had hot periods, cold periods, polar shifts, earthquakes, ice ages, asteroid strikes, volcanoes etc! 250 million years ago there was a period where the whole planet rained for 2 million years!
@@frankhartman323 Agreed! The insane part is people thinking they can stop or change weather patterns with Money and restrictions from individual Country's. Stop the Madness People!
I live in PNW and I've seen intense changes in weather. We've gone as long as 7 months without any precipitation. I've put a bucket out with a stick to prevent small animals from drowning. Deer have sucked it dry.
Back in the late 1980s I was shovelling a foot or more of snow off my grandparent's driveway, several times a week. It was considered normal (as was our nose hairs freezing together) and there was no question of shutting down in those conditions.
Just last week my Ontario Canada city pretty much shut down because we got 5cm/2" of snow. We've become so used to warmer winters, here, that we no longer have the infrastructure to cope with a light dusting of the white stuff.
That's nuts, I figured all of Canada would have all city's covered with plows, we don't get what we normally get her either and that's in western Michigan. 10 years ago we had so much snow my cows could have walked right over the fence if they wanted. But that's with lake effect snow. We got dumped on that year.
You’re not the only ones. It seems the whole of the NYC metro has forgotten how to deal with winter weather. I swear it’s almost as if the majority of people are actively wishing for climate change to bring an end to all forms of solid perspiration in the area.
I can’t stand it!
Technically Seattles’ landscape was formed by glaciers & we too can’t deal with 2” of snow. However, this doesn’t support human caused climate change so we dismiss this as climate change
WATCH THE TRUTH
th-cam.com/video/5yZhh2leRJA/w-d-xo.html
I was thinking this exact same thing the other day when we got just a couple inches of snow in Chicago.
I was in Lytton BC (near Vancouver) when it caught on fire and burned to the ground. The whole town. Gone. The previous two days it got up to 49.6C. This is no joke and I don't think it is even a matter of being optimistic or pessimistic anymore. Too little too late.
I lived in (sorta nearby) Pemberton BC for a few years and all the horrible things that have happened to BC this past year just breaks my heart for everyone. It hit 40C a couple times in Pemberton when I was there, but I can't imagine it getting any hotter. I'd much rather experience those hot temperatures in Arizona, where I currently live.
You have a pole flip and ice age to look forward to. Not to late to adapt there.
The north American drought is moving N at the same rate as the poles are moving.
Approx 50 miles a year
I miss the thumbs down feature
I wonder how the 'dust bowl days' of the 1930s compare to the present, and whether there were similar causes.
Farmers have reported they see resemblance.
Quality content professionally presented.
No hyper-graphics, no smoked-glass weather studios, no over-produced segments with over-polished anchors.
Just clean, factual and highly informative. Score: 10
Minus 5 for overlooking geo-engineering.
Thanks to Weather Scientist, all about facts, no PR jargon or Marketing gimmics.
Accuracy matters more
Minus 10 for deliberately ignoring obvious science about the magnetic coupling of the earths poles to the sun which is the reason for polar warming in the first place.
@@trevorh6438 Really? Where did you get that tidbit of information? What does magnetism have to do with airmass movement? So you are pushing your political dogma into science now? Not going to work.
I’ve only been on the planet for 70 years, but my recollections back to my youth are that, although we certainly had extreme weather-3 feet of snow, powerful thunderstorms, hot and dry summers, etc.-one, the frequency has increased, and two, anomalous weather patterns like superstorms, the polar vortex, etc. have also increased. Something as simple as the jetstream moving northward could explain a lot. I guess the million-dollar question is whether we can reverse that or if it’s too late.
We were talking about the coming ice age back when you and I were kids in the 1970's. Earth has been in an ice age cycle for the last 2.5 million years (100,000 of ice, 10,000 years or so of interglacial warming period). I comment " Who ever told you that climate stability is for this planet, do you see any other planet with climate stability anywhere?" on all the climate topics.
It's never too late, the longer we put off ending emissions the more changes will happen but it's a sliding scale, we can avoid worse outcomes by starting now.
Some times it is too late and you can never have what you want ever again.
These comments are a kaleidoscope of emotions.
@@fudgedogbannana A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. You have some understanding of facts, but miss the actual picture. Please keep reading and learning.
GeoEngineering is causing this craziness in our weather, weather warfare
bleh
@@jessmore9870 there’s patents on the technology and it was publicly talked about in the 50’s & 60’s if you do any amount of research you’ll see exactly what’s being done and why the chemtrails are being sprayed in our sky’s
@@BaconJD420 Patents on what? Geoenginnering? Chemtrails? Cite one piece of "research." Conspiracy theorists always say "do the research" because they don't know what they're talking about.
@@jessmore9870 and lazy dimwits Believe what they’re told not even with their own eyes see like a beautiful blue sky that turns to a dull grey mess in a matter of a hour or two by planes “exhaust” but not every plane, just some, and apparently they can turn the “exhaust” off and on in mid flight, you must be a complete fool, stop looking at instagram and twitter for a few and view your surroundings for once you might just learn sumpin dipshit, why have the levels of aluminum and barium exploded in our water and soil samples in the past 20 years? Your probably not even old enough to have witnessed the change’s that have occurred
Thanks Maiya. Very informative.
The eastern and southern shift of weather patterns is interesting. Especially the late fall tornados that keep recurring out in the Tennessee region.
The first December tornado in Minnesota's history reportedly touched down in Plainview in Wabasha County during the 8 p.m. hour Wednesday ...
Dec 15, 2021
That is unheard of until now.
Solar induction heats the poles due to magnetic coupling with the sun. Check the science, its the sun driving everything climate related, not CO2
@@trevorh6438 the sun gets 10%hotter every million years so in about 2 million years bacteria will not be able to live on earth.
@@topfuel29channel it's not unheard of just hasn't happened as much recently. But yes they have been tornadoes as far north as Canada in the winter time do the research
@@briancollett961 what observational science do you have that proves that?
I live between Ottawa and Montreal in Canada and we have started to get more and more tornadoes. It's also hard to think that while we in eastern Canada got heavy rain, the west coast was burning :(
I live in Ottawa and for years I've had recurring dreams about living in communities where the buildings are domes to be tornado resistant. They are a concern to me as well.
In the west we have always a loads of rain but last year we had more rain than ever before, so much so that the Fraser valley completely flooded. Summers have been hotter an hotter to the point that we got halfway to boiling. Autumn winds have been getting stronger and stronger and so have spring winds to the point that we have had extreme weather warnings that include tornado warnings
The increased north/south amplitude of the jet stream means more dramatic shifts in weather. I tell people that when the jet stream dips over the east then we have "snowmageddon" in Washington DC while Denver has a thaw. After two to 6 weeks these arctic dips move eastward and then Denver is in deep winter and DC is in a thaw.
Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University hypothesized over ten years ago that the loss of perennial arctic sea ice created these dramatically greater "meanders" in the jet stream north and south. I have been watching it happen from NE Utah for ten years.
These are dramatic shifts from cold to heat and wet to dry. Over a greater period of time (decades) this will "average out" and yes southerly areas will on average will be dryer - but the effect on the ground will be very erratic from wet to dry and hot to cold for decades to come. Weather shifting from hot to cold/wet to dry on this 2 to 6 week timescale will become more extreme until there is more mixing of the arctic cold air masses and the tropical warm air masses. Once this mixing is complete and somewhat stabilized (decades ? centuries ?). we will once again have tropical vegetation in Greenland and hopefully more stable and consistent tropical/sub-tropical global climate. If we stop producing greenhouse gases. We could even return to normal after 35,000 to 45,000 years. (see research of James Zachos of University of California.)
If we keep forcing the heating of the atmosphere and the globe - we will begin to face increased heating and drying of the planet turning large portions of the planet into inhospitable desert. The most severe period like this occurred 250 million years ago during Permian-Triassic extinction event. Known to scientists as "The Great Dying". 80% of marine species died. 70% of terrestrial vertebrates, and it was the largest extinction of insects. Contemporary human civilization as we know it would not survive these conditions.
The fear is that with the rapid rate of warming we will unlock problems like thawing the vast amounts of frozen methane in the arctic seafloor and releasing gaseous methane into the atmosphere which will accelerate warming. Causing a cascading series of failures that we cannot manage. Even while there are natural processes that are buffering some of these effects, the planet clearly has enough history of dramatic degradations of the habitable environment that we need to be very careful. Already, IPCC is saying we need to stop producing greenhouse gases in 3 years to avoid very grave risks.
So we really need to pull together and realize that we are all in this together - there is no viable escape (despite what a half-dozen billionaires might believe and are willing to accept - as they try to jump,ship.)
The hubris of those billionaires will come crashing down once they realize you can't ultimately fight mother nature and natural law.....no matter how rich you are.
I had a junior high teacher in the early 60s who told us about the global warming theory. He told us that the jet stream and weather would get unstable and the extremes would get more extreme. He was teaching what theories are and said global warming was an example of a very new theory.
When I was young (1950) weather was just something that happened. Now it is a major aspect in the lives of people everywhere. One Observation of local weather in northern Thailand (my home for 20 years) has been the flower season has moved from April to March.
Excellent explanation of the drivers affecting the jet stream. As an old school Air Force navigator the jet stream was highly important to my job, and understanding it's ebb and flow were a primary focus of my preparations and in-flight calculations. Weather has therefore always interested me. That said, I would like to see if there is research going back further than 1,000 years. We are, after all, still living in a period of geologic glaciation (over the last 2 million years) and we are used to the climate conditions endemic in this period. It defines "normal" to us, but our short life spans have necessarily driven the focus to short-term conditions within 1 or 2 generations of our life. We need to understand the larger scale impacts of natural changes throughout geologic history as a precursor to understanding the impacts we humans have been having on the planet.
There's tons of research into climate behavior and global temperature using ice-core samples, going back millions of years. With that in mind, I wonder if it's harder and more time-consuming to specifically study the jet stream.
Perhaps they can go further back in time now that they've trekked all over Greenland to get the ice-core samples. But the jet stream seems like a very fiddly, highly specific thing to try to nail down, especially when you _have_ to map out every year to see how it's behaving.
That's an excellent point, about how we need to focus on the long-term too. We've had several greenhouse periods in the past. Maybe we'll end up like the last time it happened, 55 million years ago, when the global temp was 5-8C higher than now. The arctic will turn into a rain forest again, and crocodiles and palm trees will live up there again. I mean, that's gonna take a few thousand years for species to move/adapt. But maybe that's where it'll all end up.
In the meantime, if that's the road we go down, we're gonna have massive climate migration since the equator's gonna be uninhabitable. Lots of relocating of food production too. I guess the good news is that since the permafrost is melting (which is driving the greenhouse cycle), there will be plenty of rich soil to grow things in.
WATCH THE TRUTH
th-cam.com/video/5yZhh2leRJA/w-d-xo.html
Interesting thought. Careful how far back we go though. The north pole didn't have much ice between 5.33 and 2.56 million years ago. Jet stream likely much weaker or non-existant.
@@okiedokie085 just fyi, I'm reporting all your comments as spam. 😉😘
@@matthensle9391 Thank you for the heads up. That truly wasn't my intention. I can see how my comment would have come across as so or even aggressive. It is a topic, like most, I am overwhelmed with and frustrated. I apologize if it was taken as spam. My desire is for information in all respects be made aware of, and hope we can shine light on hope. Stay safe out there!!
I wonder if there is any correlation between jet stream movement and the heat island effect of sprawling cities. I remember riding my motorcycle out of city limits at night in the summer and the temp dropping significantly
Yes you may well be right. Heat added is heat added. Concrete heats up where forests don't. It's not the co2. It's the heat added through human activities and infrastructure not the air. We can't stop that unless we kill off billions of people. This I would not recomend.
@@lawneymalbrough4309 well crap. so its wild weather until the end of humanity :/
@@lawneymalbrough4309 I wonder if putting roof top green spaces, and painting roofs of homes and minor buildings white would help alleviate heat soak and reflect solar radiation/absorb it in plant life, would help anything. Like minor changes might have drastic long term benefits, like asphalt roads being painted or having dyes in them to make them light gray instead of black, as black soaks up heat and radiates it for hours and hours. Light gray will still heat soak, but nowhere near as bad or for as long.
I would agree that there is a correlation to these massive concrete structures in which they cause more heat in the cities due to the lack of green spaces. When you have cities that have these huge warehouses sprawling all over the place it causes major environmental problems. One has to wonder how much junk do we need to keep flowing into these countries? Maybe if we go back to the basic necessities of life we may help change the course of all this.
It's all because Jesus Christ. Is coming back Soon. Read my comment. What I typed takes out all the guess work. That I have commented often to folks. In this Nation and world wide on You Tube. For a very long time now. I take none of the credit in doing so. ALL the Glory and Honar goes to The Lord. I'm just a messenger (-:
Whenever you watch the news and it comes around to the weather report the meteorologist will always mention when a record has been broken. Over the past 25 to 30 years the increase in the number of records broken really scares me. The first day of summer this year was 101 degrees (38 Celsius) where I live and throughout the summer there were several days in the 90s. Last December we had a couple days in the 60s and 70s and even had a few tornadoes. Where do I live...Minnesota. Yeah, tornadoes in Minnesota IN DECEMBER!
60-70 send that north buddy I’m pretty sure 11 or 12 was actually the warmest winter on average I’ve ever seen
Like it’s happened before …… but it hasnt
Wow!!
Canadian Granite Shield ? Will do a lot to protect Minnesota from devastation w CC.
This has caused the annual amount of tornados in my region of Ontario Canada from 2 to ~40. One nearly leveled my house in Barrie this summer, it came within 150m of it!
150m is far where I'm from 🤣 but I'm glad to hear you made it out alright and hate to hear that.
Bohoo try waking up in a Sandstorm! But really glad you ok mate! The weather on drugs whatcha think?
@@tristancordero3157 cut through a town, so for someone who isn't used to tornados, 150meters is pretty close
i live in texas and luckily have never seen a tornado, but have definitely been close to a few. nothing is worse than huddling in a closet, hearing the sirens going off. all you can do is hope you dont get hit, it is a hopeless feeling.
@@tristancordero3157 thats pretty close
This makes a tremendous amount of sense. IE if it does move north, the northeast will be hit with a lot more hurricanes. Due to them not being able to be pushed east via the jet stream.
Not necessary "more" hurricanes.
But stronger and longer lasting storms and a longer hurricane season.
Remember the movement of weather systems will slow down with the Jetstream.
While ocean and air temperature increases and winters get milder.
Still bad.. if your not a mosquito.
@@NewPipeFTW I would argue that the increase in sea temperatures, does and will signal an increase in the number of tropical cyclones across the world. Now on the other hand, tornado frequency is not as certain.
th-cam.com/video/rEWoPzaDmOA/w-d-xo.html
The Northeast has actually gone through one of the longest periods on record with barely any hurricanes. Back in the 1950's 1960's they got struck constantly. The last Northeast hurricane landfall was Bob in 1991 31 years ago which is a huge amount of time considering there's some years where they got hit by 2 powerful hurricanes in one season like 1954
Paul Beckwith has been breaking down the science of the Jet Stream and Rossby Waves on his TH-cam channel for years. He did a video explaining why the cold weather in Texas coincided with abnormally warm temperatures over Greenland during February 2021.
The truck crash at 3:37 in this video is a perfect metaphor for those who ignore the signs.
Yes, it was very informative. I wish most of the people in the U.S. could watch this and understand the reasons for it, instead of insulting the way Texas had to respond to something that hasn't happened there in over 135 years with it's sub zero arctic ice storms for 4 days and shutting down everything all the way to Mexico and killing all the subtropical crops and shutting down energy to the rest of the country. Texas infrstructure is designed for extreme heat up to 115 degrees F, not negative 21 degrees F. Utilities here have to be cooled, not heated. Can't have both.
@@KB-ke3fi "happened there in over 135 years"
Are you even listening to what you are saying? You are saying that IT HAS HAPPENED in the past.
@@KB-ke3fi I agree; the weather is apolitical.
predicting future would support theory (understanding of cause and effects) correctness, so tell me something i do not know
makes lots of talking head jobs . . . .
Thank you for the reference of Paul Beckwith.! Going to check out his videos. It appears he knows what he’s talking about.
I'm really happy this topic is being discussed
This is exactly what I was suspecting all last year, it was the only way I could explain the Texas deep freeze and the BC heat dome. Where I am in Alberta also felt the heat and choked on the forest fire smoke for two months. We need to adapt better now, because it’s happening now.
So glad I don’t live inland. All the pollution from the wildfire smoke went to NY, Midwest, & Europe. Funny cause they’re the ones saying it was a Cal/WestCoast problem when the skies are relatively clean by the coastline where majority of the population lives.
@@ricecakeboii94 because the wind took the smoke east.
Adapt? Why not just stop using fossil fuels and actually tackle the gases driving climate change?
@@NanNaN-jw6hl that would be great, actually. Even if it started to reverse, it could take years. I was thinking in terms of a city being able to handle a snowstorm, or housing being able to handle heat.
The waves are deep, and possibly deeper, but I want to see the data or a timelapse of decades.
Statistical aberrations occur, so intense methods need to be used to determine if these events (jet stream waves) are outside of the statistical norm or not.
The turbulent nature of the atmosphere makes it a bit difficult to actually assess.
Girl, you are proving that your people CAN be productive and CAN do good. This is amazing.
Has anyone figured in the tilt of the change in the Earth's axis? Goes back & forth from around 24.2 - 23.8°. Has massive impact on glacial formation, moisture content of the Sahara (GreenSahara) etc.
Not one person has ever done this.
No sphere, no tilt.
Does Cycles happen over tens of thousands of years and it's currently going in a direction that would predict cooler weather in few tens of thousands of years so it's directionally wrong to predict as the cause of global warming
I'd like to see how (or if) this ties in with El Niño and La Niña in start, duration and strength. Both affect global weather: Are they connected?
L
El Nino could provide a seasonal counter balance but the tropics are not warming as fast so the described trend in the video still holds...I think
There are also oscillations, which are cycles of climate that aren't specifically la nina and el nino.
@@errol3184 I'm in Western Australia, and we are seeing all time record high temperatures. A couple of weeks ago we crack through 50C, while some places in the interior are seeing their annual rainfall in a day. The east coast is awash with unseasonal rain and low temps...
I've noticed significant climate changes locally over the last 25 years...
@@Chris-hx3om worst part is that it doesn’t matter if all the first worlds can go green cause none of the third worlds & Chyna are giving up their sulfur-rich coal.
August 12, 1936 and June 28, 1994 - 120 degrees
As crazy as it sounds, there are two dates that tie for the hottest day in Texas history. The heatwave of 1994 earned the most spots on this list, but the summer of 1936 is the earliest super-hot day in history. On August 12, 1936, Fort Worth and Seymour clocked in intimidating temperatures reaching 120 degrees.
I survived the Texas heatwave of 1980. Havn't experienced anything like it since.
I explained to my child (b. 2000) that when I was little (b. 1969), winter was steady cold for a good three months. You needed your coat every day without question. Summer was consistently hot. Autumn and spring were slow changes from one extreme to the other. Now, we get spells of seriously chilly nights in summer, very warm days in the dead of winter, chaos in spring and autumn. This is just the beginning. #GlobalWeirding.
We’ve been coming out of an ice age for about 10,000 years now and not finished. What happens in a single lifetime is insignificant and proof of NOTHING.
Yep. I took a photo of my front yard in Feb 1982 as a preteen, because I had never experienced a February day without any snow on the ground. It had warmed enough to melt the snow. We always had snow for the December holiday as a child. I have moved from the midwest (U.S.) to the New England area so it's hard to compare directly. But even over the years I've been here, we now don't get our first significant snowfall until mid to late January. And anecdotally, today will be 95F and tomorrow is supposed to be 68F.
Durning the last Grand Solar Minimum.
I worked 300+ miles above the Arctic Circle in 2019. Ot was so hot some days the natives were getting heat stress. When I checked the annual rain fall ( I can't remember right now) that it was very low. That summer it rained in 4 months more than 4 years. I happen to be there when the researchers were presenting their data on climate. I took a picture of one of the slide presentations showing a heatwave close to the North Pole.
The coast line was being eroded and falling into the ocean, permafrost included.
When I was there I was watching the beluga whales migration from North to South. This is when the natives gauge their whaling season. Then 2 weeks later the beluga were heading North again. Then about 2-3 weeks later beluga were headed South again. The natives said they seemed confused.
At this presentation one of the elders said the seasonal hunting has changed. Now, apparently because the water had warmed a specific bacteria is growing on shellfish which are giving the seal a disease where the natives can not make a fermented oil for food.
Since I was there I wanted to get a Polar Bear certificate and jump in the Arctic Ocean. The natives said I was crazy. I ran and dove in and the water was cold but it actually felt like water around the Los Angeles area. What really struck me was the water was barely salty. It tasted more like fresh water. I was actually shocked. The only thing I could think about this was maybe because of all the rain and ice melting around the coastline made it this way.
My experience there was nothing like I imagined, and the facts brought out by the researchers and natives made me realize that this weather change is a huge problem.
This is unedited so my apologies if this is all over the place and if there a typos.
Most of that is correct but spring and autumn are seasons of extremes. They're known for the massive changes. Like in my town our average high plummets by almost 10 degrees in just 1 month. You have to have a lot of cold/hot extremes to have that happen. Though it also depends where you live. In PA fall and spring change very fast
Yea something up when you’re getting F4 tornadoes for Christmas in Kentucky…
I would be interested in how the earth's pole shift has on the weather effects as well. Since the earth is well overdue for the next polar shift, it would seem to me that such a process would totally redefine the earths weather patterns. Would you consider a video addressing this process and its anticipated weather effects?
M Douglas, It seems like they are not interested in your topic because it doesn't go with the narrative they have been diffusing all these years. I would love to see more about the earth's pole shift too but very few people are speaking about it. It's all about the elimination of fossil fuels. It's not even about science.
You have to read between the lines with these propaganda pieces. They are admitting the pole shift and it's effects but they HAVE TO blame "man" for the taxes.
Thank you. I say that because, in fact, we did have a pole shift 2 years ago. I watched my compass, one not connected to the net, dance east to west for several years. Then 2 years ago instead of pointing north, it pointed exactly in the opposite direction. Something in my 64 years I have never seen it do. It's funny you should mention the weather. In 1988, where I live, we experienced over 60 days of 90-degree heat. We normally only get 6 and it was also the driest summer I ever remember. The weather changed every ten years since then. This year, starting last fall, the weather pattern seems to have returned back to what it was before 1988.
@@jefferyneider863 This is very interesting. Have you recorded your data somehow? Is there a way one could do a research based on your findings?
Yes and the pole shift is already occurring. And yes we have a depleted jet stream
In the midwest we have a very obvious difference in the weather. Winters are virtually non-existant and summers are more oppressive. 30 years ago we would get good sized snow storms now we get an inch here and there. The summers used to get really hot in August but now it happens in June sometimes may. Spring and autumn is non existent.
Once, the seasons in Chicago were pretty clear cut and stable. Now, anything goes.
There is a noticeable humidity in the upper atmosphere, which manifests as this very thin haze. It is enough to interfere with stargazing. Looking at satellite weather maps, it looks like it's being generated from evaporation in the Arctic.
The once-regular seasons seem to be about six weeks or so off, being either early or late. Throughout last year, we got to see that ridiculous "inversion" of the Jet Stream, where it was noticeably vertical (north and south) instead of horizontal. We are seeing cooler summers and warmer drier winters, with both having less precipitation than usual.
However, we are still getting our "normal" extreme punches of severe highs and lows.
How about from nuclear power plants in Russia? Isn't that where your jetstream comes from?
@@nancyfahey7518 seriously? jesus
That's NOT humidity causing haze, it's dispersed aerosols & yes, that's what's causing the extreme weather. Things have been done without knowing what the long term effects would be. It's a man made disaster.
@@katiekane5247 so what is happening in Chicago is affecting the global weather? seriously? jesus
@@XD-te6vj reading and comprehension. They’re clearly stating that they’ve notice irregular weather patterns in Chicago. They didn’t say it affects global weather. I’ve noticed changes in Chicago too, we don’t have cold Decembers anymore, we had a couple of 60° days in December for a while now … not normal
Studies have also shown that the earths magnetosphere is weakening which also plays a huge role in jet stream behavior and sun activity has a role to play as well.
Where did you hear that the Earth's magnetosphere is affecting the jet stream.
Please explain. It sounds like a crazy fun story.
NASA.GOV
There's no evidence that Earth's climate has been significantly impacted by the last three magnetic field excursions, nor by any excursion event within at least the last 2.8 million years.Aug 3, 2021
I live in Alabama. I USED to enjoy a good rain storm. Now I spend most of them sheltering from tornadoes. The number of them has DOUBLED in the last 20 years...we are in second place behind Kentucky for that.🌪
Increasing global temperature of course influences the wind and rainfall. Increasing average temperature means more evaporation, which means more water in the atmosphere. So heavier rainfall is to be expected. If a place is heated up more, the temperature the density of the air changes, differences in air density in different places leads to pressure, which is what causes wind.
Born and raised in Hawaii and having a deep background in big wave surfing and forecasting, Ive been watching the northern and southern Pacific jet streams regularly for many many years and have noticed the past 8 to 10 yrs the northern mid latitude jet has been crossing the equator below Hawaii just to the east very strong during the winter months. The hemispheres are intermingling and I know this is far from normal.There are a few other places on the planet that do this also but more pronounced in the central Pacific. Im no expert on climatology but from what I understand this is a major climate emergency that is being swept under the rug by the mainstream media.
The pole shift...we are in the process of a pole shift and it's messing with the climate systems and everything else.
To what extent is it being hidden? I've heard a lot about it, haven't you?
You bet bro. Everything is fully distorted by media/government. Prepare yourself and your people for a cleansing of "supposed" biblical terms. The writting is on the wall, eyelashes are glued on good and cell phone fully charged.
Absolutely, the bee population here in the eastern US has been decimated over the last decade. The weather is not normal and no doubt that the powers that be have been manipulating our weather to the point that that the earth’s feed back loops are engaging on a scale never seen before in our lifetime. I am not an expert but I read a lot and pay attention to nature and our weather patterns.
Mainstream media does preciseley as they are told to do by governments, same as russia really. A good and thorough cleansing is required and inevitable.
Since the 1960's, rapid logging has had a tremendous impact on climate change in the PNW, from Northern CA to WA.........
we would appreciate your investigative report on this topic. Chemical defoliants used on forests have poisoned the water and wildlife,
humans included......
Well said! We need transparency and accountability from these huge corporations. People should be outraged by what these huge corporations are doing to our forests, not disclosing what they're spraying, when, where...it's actually horrifying!
The forests grow back very fast here in WA state my property was logged in the 1970s when the house was built but the Douglas fir trees are now full size some must be 130 feet tall or so.
I have to disagree with your assessment that the Pacific Northwest is getting wetter. I've lived here my entire life and it's getting drier, actually. I remember the rainy season lasting from Mid-October to Mid-June and now we're lucky if it rains before November and having it last to April. There's also a lot less rain fall during that time, as well. I accept that the jet stream is moving North, but I think you'll find that Portland, Oregon will have a climate similar to San Francisco within a few decades, while Juno, Alaska up to Anchorage will have milder climates, similar to those from Eugene to Vancouver, BC today.
It was an illogical assessment of the data they provided. Why would a greater variable in the jet stream focus moisture into one area and leave the other without anything? If anything it would mean periods of hot and dry followed by a dip which brings cooler and wet. But even that would only partially be out of the norm. That protected jet stream didn't leave the historical norms until 2040 range. And still had 90 percent in the historical norms range.
It is indeed overall drier in PNW. That said the intensity of of the rainfall is much higher before when the so-called atmospheric rivers hit the right spot. Definitely different from 5,10, 20 years ago when the rain was more consistent and regular but usually less intense.
Our solar system is heating up, not just Earth..Look it up you think im bs..Theres way more going on then they are telling us
@@SpaceRanger187 big if true👉
Exactly. Way way more going on than they are telling. This is actually happening with our entire galaxy. If you know the Suspicious Observer channel, he covered this exact issue in a video of his about 3 months ago. Explained it like a scientist explains it. Really great channel if you don’t know it!
I remember several years ago an attempt was made to curb the winds of a hurricane. It did work to a certain extent. The contentious among the scientist was they were afraid that what they do would make the Hurricane worse. I really doubt that the Arctic is warming because every time a submarine surfaces in the Arctic there is always plenty of ice. Have you seen the Russian side of the Arctic, also plenty of ice and bitter COLD temp. Have you ever considered that the scientist who say it is melting are staying in DC offices because it is nice and warm and can easily go to Post Office to collect their Grant Checks.
LOL BINGO
I would like to hear him talk about how the dilution of the salinity in our oceans has a lot to do with our weather patterns also.
YES, THE ARTIC MELT IS ALLOWING FRESH WATER TO GO INTO THE OCEAN, AND SLOW DOWN THE GULF STREAM, IF A LOT OF FRESH WATER GOES IN FROM MELTING, AND THE GULF STREAM STOPPES, THEN EUROPE WILL GET SEVERE FREEZES IN THE WINTER , THERE ARE TH-cam VIDEOS ON THE SUBJECT YOU CAN FIND
At 4:11 you show a jet stream over BC Canada. I live in the area that was affected in Kamloops and we hit 47C or 117F during this time. It set a record of 10F higher than any other recorded temperature here ever with the old record being 107F is about 42C. There were 5 consecutive days we were over the old record high. A neighboring town registered 49.8C or 121 F becoming the first temperature recorded in Canada ever of over 120F.
Then in November in a time when we are supposed to be freezing we had road washouts and flooding in the mountains. 2021was an incredible year for the south of BC.
😚😚😚 terrible for you.
Last frost day where I live is may 5. Two days ago,may 22 , we had overnight temps that killed my garden and many of the flowers I had put out. Global warming? Save it for someone else.
This hits home for me because I'm from Atlanta and moved to Seattle last year. The heat wave over the summer here was horrendous and with no AC I had to jump in my cold shower to keep from going into to shock. In Atlanta my parents said the summer temp stayed in the 80s. Rain is normal in summer in the southeast but it was everyday.
Having a misting spray bottle (even the cheap ones that have at least a relatively fine mist) that you can spray your face, neck, arms, legs while walking (creating a breeze if the air is still), or while at home spraying toward a fan blowing the mist back on you, will help. I've had situations where doing this a few times per minute kept me relatively cool.
Come soon Lord Jesus, Come soon!!!
@@theodoreottey9784 Amen!
ATL is chilly in the summer. Down here in the MOB we get heat indexes well above the Seattle heat wave. They aren't used to that, so ya, that was bad.
Who says the weather is getting wilder? It's not as bad as it was when I was a kid 55 years ago.
I'm from Oklahoma, and I began to see less and less precipitation, and more noticeably, less storms and tornados, so I looked for what the jet stream was doing. I was shocked at the change. States more north and east were getting more tornados but were not prepared like we were, with devastating effects. In the winter we are getting less precipitation, and more sunny temperate days. Everywhere on the planet is effected, and I heard recently that the Gulf Stream was also changing. We definitely live in auspicious times!
Same, I’m a Florida native who moved to Oklahoma City in about 2011 and I remember that there was a fair amount of rain in March, April and May when I moved here. Over the years, Thunderstorms started getting scarcer and scarcer. I’ve never seen my grass so brown this past summer. Also I noticed that the season are shifting to the “right” as in the cooler months are moving into May, June territory while the warmer months are in October and November. Crazy to see this right before my eyes in the span of a decade.
OK, this talks about the changing jet streams. Then they present a computer model that says we don't have to worry until 2060 or so. I am 70 years old. I have been aware of the threat of Climate Change since my high school science classes some 50 years ago. What I have noticed is that they keep saying some version of, "don't worry, it is still 20 years off." It used to be 2050, now it's 2060. The fact of the matter is that it is right now, not tomorrow. I live in Vancouver, B.C. 2021 gave us record breaking heat waves which killed a number of people and destroyed the sea life that lives in the tide pools. We also had record breaking forest fires. Then we had record breaking rain falls which caused enough flooding that we were quite literally cut off from the rest of Canada. Between bridges and roads being washed out and rail lines being destroyed the only way to have east west travel was to detour south down through the states. This caused gas rationing for a couple of weeks where people were limited to 30 liters of gas at a time. Then we had a record breaking cold snap around Christmas. But Climate Change is still way off in the future. Yea right. Wake up folks. We are being played. CC is here, now. Not 20 or 30 years in the future.
It always aways off. Just like they talk about staying under 1.5c but keep moving the baseline?? We're over 2c using the 1750 baseline. About to lose the Arctic ice and methane levels are starting to go vertical now
The greatest short coming of the human race is our in ability to understand the exponential function- Al Bartlett
I did not really "get" the notion that the computer model says no worries, because, like you, I have been seeing the changes for decades. (born 1960) CC is here.
@@Jc-ms5vv
Precisely correct. Facts
I am a couple of years older than you and have seen the same thing. I was in my forties before I ever saw a temperature over 100F. Now there are several a year. Last year, an Arctic blast came through, dropped the temp to -27 and killed fruit trees and grape vines that were forty years old. Prior to the 1970s, those winter temps were common.
I live in central California and our new issue is relentless high winds, mostly from N-NW. The new pattern over the past few years has been moderate winter rainfall, followed by weeks and sometimes months of constant drying winds that precede the late spring/ summer heat. Our vegetation is already bone dry by mid- May, making us vulnerable to the dry, summer heat. We are a tinder box from mid-May through November.
The cities in california create a heat plume in the atmosphere and this combined with the mountains changes the ocean winds and weather patterns. THAt is the biggest effect humans have in USA on weather. When californi failed forest mgmt causes fires, that too changes the weather for thre rest of the country and potentially world. "Global warming" is simply Liberalism run AMOK!
In so many of these documentary's, sadly nearly nothing is mentioned about the magnetic field weakening by 10% now, and magnetic north having drifted 24 degrees, at increasing spead.
Logically this is the main factor.
"We have to zoom way, way out into the troposphere."
🤦🏻♂️ You know you're sitting in the troposphere right now-on the ground-right?
Ha. Good point! We should have said "high into the troposphere"
I've lived in North Central/Central Iowa for all my life and I can tell you in my experiance the seasons have changed. 52 years ago it was common to have snow on the ground at Thanksgiving and there it was pretty common to have snow cover on the ground north of the I-80 corridor pretty much Nov.-early March. Winters were pretty cold with ice covered lakes and rivers that people ice fished on and snowmobiling was a popular past time. Since the 1980's winters have become warmer and the seasons seem off, as in fall lasts later into winter and winter into spring.
Also springs have been wetter and cooler and July and August are not as hot and dry as they traditionally were.
WATCH THE TRUTH
th-cam.com/video/5yZhh2leRJA/w-d-xo.html
I agree, I live up near Mason City and over the past 15-20 years the winters are not only warmer, but offset. Over the past 10 years, I've noticed the winters start out warmer (Nov-Dec) but the cold is hanging around longer into the spring. Plus the lack of actual snowfall. Most snowmobilers now must head farther north into Minnesota and Wisconsin to see some actually good snow. Just this last couple weeks, we have seen some incredible temperature differences, starting out with an overnight low of -21f to a high of 32f and then dropping back down that night to a low of -10f. We are definitely seeing more and more greater extremes. During the summer months growing up in the 70's and 80's, the summers were hot and dry with plenty of clear skies. Now the temps are somewhat lower due to months of smoky skies from the forest fires out west. Even though our day to day weather may not have changed much, I can definitely tell what our new climate normal is looking like.
@@IowaStrmChsr Yep. I grew up in the Ackley area so I know what you mean. Remember how late Feb-March used to be foggy, damp cloudy days as all the snow pack melted, we hardly have any of those days anymore. Then April and May would be on avarage a little dryer and everyone could get crops in. Now springs are usually pretty wet. And May and June used to be tornado time in Iowa, with hot humid days that would erupt in afternoon storms. The tornado counts in Iowa are WAY down. Then July and August would dry out and it would just be hot. Now we get more rain and the daytime highs have moderated somewhat.
..it's just flat out absolutely warmer across the board..your comments are describing somewhat micro climates..which don't exist..
..long ago are the days where the nightine temps of Jan and Feb reach -20 to -30° below zero..maybe a few days here in there if even that...then long hotter summers of 80° to 100° for months into October ..the land is drying up and we can no longer be the world's breadbasket unless they want to pay exorbitant prices..like we do ..one thing we can say if our food is clean and not contaminated no we ith these endocrine disruptors..auto immune contagions..just stuff like lead cadmium chromium arsenic ..on n on..that other countries are infested with ..I would not eat as anything that's not grown in this country or Canada or even Australia..definitely not India china Indonesia Mexico...no de cc eloping nations ..DO NOT E AT FOOD NOT GROWM HERE..
The climate is collapsing faster than ever. It's called the Great Acceleration. Do the best you can. Go solar, grow your own and, land well.
Nuclear power is our saviour
“The Great”. You people love to use these buzz words
@andyparky2716 if only more people thought like you. It's a good Powe source, but given a bad reputation.
Liberal Chicken Little
SO FORTUNATE TO BE IN THIS COUNTRY , SO FORTUNATE. THANKS MOM AND DAD
There has been a great deal of published research regarding the impact on the Jet Stream in the Northern Hemisphere and the subsequent impacts, what about the Southern Hemisphere? Beyond the impacts of a changing Thermohaline circulation, what's happening (atmospherically) in the south?
I'll tell you straight up what is going on is directly related to current geomagnetic excursion. Not CO2. I ALMOST thought they were give full honestly here.
Perhaps polar shifting. But why? Is the sun phase the cause?
This is all Biblical. Jesus Second coming is very near.
PLEASE LEARN THE TRUTH>>>IT IS OUR GOVERNMENT DOING IT FOR 100 YEARS! WE MUST STOP THEM
th-cam.com/video/5yZhh2leRJA/w-d-xo.html
Well, Antartica is getting colder and colder since 20 years. So just reverse the explanation and we're good.
Some people would ask why we can't all just move north and follow the climate change? Well, it has taken thousands of years for nutrients to build up in our temperate climate soils. So, moving to where tundra and evergreen forests existed only a few decades earlier will mean many people will die from lack of water, and enough food.
PLEASE LEARN THE TRUTH>>>IT IS OUR GOVERNMENT DOING IT FOR 100 YEARS! WE MUST STOP THEM
th-cam.com/video/5yZhh2leRJA/w-d-xo.html
What I want to know is how is the shifting poles are affecting the jet stream?
Also think this has a big affect, that would also change some of the conclusions made hear!
I think you mean the axis which has been dipping & wobbling over the last 25 yrs & expected to possibly flip? Most scientists. Nobody knows what happens if the axis flips but the last time it did its suspected there was dramatic changes in climate that may have wiped out the Neanderthals.
Check out the Suspicious Observers channel. He covers a lot of the magnetic and solar influences on weather.
He (Ben) is also connected with the "Electric Universe" on youtube. what NASA termed in the 90's "Plasma Universe"
I think it's inevitable for the global temperature to increase in the next 20yrs. We need to be moving faster with changing yet it's easier to adapt with the coming realities. I don't expect an impactful turn around until it's too late.
This is ALL BS. The earth has gone through cycles for thousands of years and will continue to do so !!!🤪
The current rapid rate of warming is unprecedented.
@@hosnimubarak8869 at the end of the ice age mutch more and wait... bigger spikes during the ice age.
Same goes for it's start.
Never expect nature to stay the same, after all it was physical and biological change that made us possible.
Rather learn from the organisms that adapt instead of dying.
@@hendrickswart4122
Current atmospheric concentrations of CO2 are about 30% higher than they were about 150 years ago at the dawn of the industrial revolution. Before the industrial revolution, the CO2 content in the air remained quite steady for thousands of years. Natural CO2 is not static, however. It is generated by natural processes, and absorbed by others. But consider what happens when more CO2 is released from outside of the natural carbon cycle - by burning fossil fuels. Although our output of 51 gigatons of CO2 is tiny compared to the 750 gigatons moving through the carbon cycle each year, it adds up because the land and ocean cannot absorb all of the extra CO2. About 40% of this additional CO2 is absorbed. The rest remains in the atmosphere, and as a consequence, atmospheric CO2 is at its highest level in millions of years. (A natural change of 100ppm normally takes 5,000 to 20,000 years. The recent increase of has taken just 120 years).
Meanwhile the average global temperature on Earth has increased by about 0.8° Celsius (1.4° Fahrenheit) since 1880. Two-thirds of the warming has occurred since 1975, at a rate of roughly 0.15-0.20°C per decade. This rate of recent warming is 10x that of the gradual warming that ended the last glacial period.
Ummm......WRONG!
I'd be curious to hear more about adapting to climate change.
In Holland the average height of land is *below* sea level.
Since rising oceans are a clear problem, maybe we can learn from Holland's adaptation.
Or move. Y’all really think the governments would tell you if you’re gonna die. Nope. To them natural disasters do them a favor. You’re dead and they didn’t need another fake war to kill you.
@@davruck1 Don't be a conspiracy nut.
Holland is small and wealthy, the world has a very long coastline and the majority of people are poor. The USA is $29 trillion in debt so you will have some trouble financing the Hollandization of North America.
@@sentientflower7891 who’s wealth is it? Not yours. You’re a useless eater to them. Why do whites identify with the elites? They don’t identify with you.
@@davruck1 conspiracy theories are almost always nonsense.
the 'buckle' effect of the jet stream is from a current Grand Solar Minimum (from the Sun), happened in the 1600s
Hi oil troll.
@@hiimelfo what you only listen to science that confirm what you believe? Does the SUN not affect Earth's climate?
@@hiimelfo Also what makes them an "oil troll"? The comment didn't say what energy source is best, but you jump right to calling someone a Troll for simply stating facts! It's you who appears to be the Troll here
@@face.- nonsense. You and your other troll account are paid for by the oil companies. We get it. Troll on. Enjoy global methane levels hitting 1900.5ppb lol. Great outlook for life on earth lol 😆.
Why is it years ago all weather broadcasts included a jet stream map ? It is hard to even find one anymore and why is this information not being shared anymore ?
Because anyone who's observant enough to notice the usual weather patterns deviating drastically out of nowhere would be able to tell immediately that someone's been tampering with it and they REALLY don't want the lil kiddies catching on to their tricks. You can't sell climate change to the masses if the weather always behaves for you, so they gotta spice it up a bit. When nature disappoints, man intervenes. And climate change seems to be real profitable right now. Go green! 🙃
I'd like to hear about what research may be ongoing, to do with sea weather - there appears to be a strong connection between ocean currents and atmospheric activity, but have we learned anything more than that? And how is weather at sea going to affect things like global commerce - not just the fishing industry but also trade routes, shipping, even airplane routes?
Another thing I'm interested in (though it might not fall under your umbrella, pun intended) - sometimes we kind of joke about "send your rain over here, we need it!" But is there really a way to DO that? Not steer the storms themselves - while that would be AWESOME, I am certain that it is not possible now and probably won't be for a long time - if ever. But maybe finding ways to catch the excess water from those wet regions that are getting even more flooded, and redistributing it, channeling it, to areas that aren't so flooded? I can't imagine it'd be something so simple as a massive, continent-spanning aqueduct system - but it would be interesting to know if anyone's exploring possibilities!
That’ll be a very important thing to do with the excessive amount of wasted water: The 21’st Century has to conform with what we are experiencing now and for future generations to come “!
I'm no meteorologist but I believe that the connection between ocean current and atmospheric activity has been understood for decades now. I remember in high school learning that there are oceanic factors and atmospheric factors which dictate the flow of ocean currents
If ancient Romans built an empire wide aqueduct system there no reason, ither than political will, that our civilization cannot build a country wide one.
I dream about this also. Why not a continental aqueduct? I bet it would be cheaper and achievable sooner than desalination plants on the scale we would need them.
Oceanographer Jim Massa covers this on his channel "Science Talk."
I've lived in Colorado along the front range for about 40 years now. Back in the 80s, in the summer, every single day around noon or 1pm, we'd have a short rain shower. Within an hour, the ground would be dry. And we rarely made it out of the 80s (fahrenheit). Since about 2002 - we rarely get any rain in the summer (in my particular area). Temperatures spend a lot of time in the 90s and even into triple digits, which was unheard of in the 80s/90s. Currently, we last saw rain in (I believe) August and that was a relatively short shower that did nothing for the drought we are in. Climate change is real, no matter your political beliefs.
That is too short of a timeframe.
I'm in California, and a megadrought lasting 400 years happened 1000 years ago, long before the modern era.
Want to fight climate change? Support carbon-free nuclear power!
@@scottslotterbeck3796 It may be a short time period but we are still seeing change. You might not and that's all well and good. Shoo.
@@mayhemacres725 There are short term patterns hidden within broad and major changes. An example is the mega drought in Californis a thousand years ago, and the Little Ice Age in rhe 1600s. We cannot extrapolate from a few years when the history of the Earth is 3+ billion years.
i've noticed the same for northern utah/southern idaho, as far as summers go. winters seem about the same though.
@@scottslotterbeck3796 we're pumping CO2 into the atmosphere 10 times faster than the petm extinction event. We've experienced 10000 years of cc in less then 300 years and that's before we hit abrupt cc. Just wait till we have a icefree Arctic and methane levels go up exponentially
Ever heard of Otzi the ice man? He's a man that died 5000 year's ago in the Alps, where he remained until found in 1991, partially sticking out of the ice. He was found with all of his belongings which suggests to me that he died there at a time when that area was not covered in ice, but since the time of his death he was covered and the ice remained for 5000 years, now it's returning to a level of which Otzi might recognize.
So he lived in a Global Warming period?
How? No cars to produce CO2.... lol.
Climate is always changing. And always has. Facts
@@Wirmish you really really need to do some research if you think the earth doesn't go thru natural climate cycles. Earth warmed after the last ice age right? The mammoths weren't driving Mercedes
@@Wirmish warm water air from the ocean? maybe even volcanic activity that transfers by jet stream ? 🤔
This study leaves out the implications of Krakatoa in 536AD.
This event was responsible for incredible droughts and wild weather patterns around the world.
Perhaps we should think about adaptation rather than mitigation. MOST of the greenhouse gases being emitted are coming from developing nations, and unless you want to ask people in more impoverished parts of the world to stop developing their economies and remain poor, realistically we are just not going to stop climate change even if we were to reduce emissions in the West to zero, which is also unrealistic. Rather than spending resources and hindering our economy with regulations and killing jobs that aren't "green" enough, we should be doing things like erecting sea walls, building giant aqueducts to get water from up north, and investing in desalination plants.
Well the developed countries are responsible for the vast majority of what has been emitted so far. Also all the emissions that are generated by developed countries due to their demand of products that are produced in developing nations are exclusively attributed to the footprint of these developing countries (which does not represent reality, obviously). So it is still very important for developed countries to cut their emissions. Of course you cannot and should not blame the developing countries for the strive to become fully developed and wealthy. In fact, we should support this. It does not have to go along with lots of emissions, however. If the incentives are suitable, developing countries can use green technology from the start and just skip the carbon Era - which also makes more sense in many cases as decentralized energy systems work best in a lot of scarcely populated areas. The same thing happened to telecommunications actually: in a lot of developing countries, mobile phones are a normal thing although they never might have had a landline before. It is just a lot easier to provide radio signal coverage than to dig thousands of kilometers of landlines...
@@midgekiller2151 Well, removing the carbon and other greenhouse gases that have already been emitted is not realistic at any scale that would actually have an impact, and yes it stands to reason that the emissions that are already in the atmosphere were produced primarily by the West. Also, the demand for products produced in developing nations is benefiting them just as much as it is benefiting the industrialized nations, so it isn't fair to blame the West either. Not to mention that we simply are not at a point where renewables can fulfill the energy needs of a modern civilization. Not to mention that producing solar panels and wind turbines is not without its own contribution to atmospheric carbon, as well as environmental pollution required to mine the materials. No, in the developing world they are building coal plants, because that is the most efficient and cost effective way to meet the power demands they require, no matter how bad it is for the environment. Not to mention that the developing world has more population and dense population centers of its own, so we are not exclusively talking about scarcely populated areas, far from it. China, who is currently the top emissions producer, has 113 cities with over one million population as of today. The population of the developing world is also expected to increase more rapidly than in the West where the population is either stagnant or shrinking.
At the end of the day it is simply too late and unrealistic to stop climate change. It's happening. Making it so poor people can't drive to work in the US by banning gasoline powered cars that working class people can actually afford won't fix it. Causing brownouts and blackouts by closing down fossil fuel based power plants (and NUCLEAR, if you actually care about emissions we should be pushing nuclear because that actually CAN power a modern civilization, easily, and its ill effects are still FAR less than that of fossil fuel plants) won't fix it. The thing we CAN do is what humans are great at doing and have been already doing since we first walked the plains of Africa hundreds of thousands of years ago - adaptation. Sea walls, creating drought tolerant crops, creating technology to bring water to places, THAT is a much cheaper and more feasible solution that also won't screw the world's poor any more than they already are in the process.
PLEASE LEARN THE TRUTH>>>IT IS OUR GOVERNMENT DOING IT FOR 100 YEARS! WE MUST STOP THEM
th-cam.com/video/5yZhh2leRJA/w-d-xo.html
For all those interested in actual science, read about Magnetic Excursion Events. Severe climate changes occur cyclically. Gothenburg (12,000 years ago), Lake Mungo (24,000 years ago), Mono Lake (36,000 years ago), Leschamp (46,000 years ago). These events caused massive die-offs and changes in fauna, flora, shores, deserts, etc. Humans cause pollution, but our effect on climate change is minimal. So get ready for a wild ride, cause the climate changes we’re seeing are just the beginning.
With respect, all the climate change comparisons between this and other cycles is that the human impact has made ALL of these changes in this cycle bigger and more widespread.
Further, all the big shifts and events you mention happened well before the worldwide spread of humans and our near- worldwide fossil fuel consumption. There is no valid comparison, just that wild ride you mentioned.
@@eric2500 I know what you mean, but we're talking about different things. As the media says, in the last 200 years, climate is changing due to us, but this is noly true if you look the last 200 years, which is biased. If you look further, this warming up was expected to happen (as part of the 12,000 cycle) and will worsen severely (those 12,000 year cycles had major climate catastrophes, geographical changes and global fauna extintions). Even if we had done zero pollution, the climate would be changing and the cycle would occur. An additional note, this Magnetic Excursion affects the entire solar system and this was show by the many climate and magnetic field changes on all planets in our solar system.
I'm just surprised she didn't blame white supremacy..
You ain’t liein!
The temperature differences guide the Jetstream. Just as the fresh and salt water, heat and cold differences guide the ocean's conveyer belt.