Yo tengo el boombox 3 wifi y estoy super agusto con el me encanta su calidad de sonido y ese bajo super profundo que hace temblar las ventanas de mi casa a pesar de ser pequeño ❤
Sony all the way! In jbl the instruments got loose and only can hear the voices... but the sony stands all together and well balanced, all the way Sony!
You have a wonderful and sensitive ear, congratulations. Those who do not understand balanced and natural presentation, or rather cannot hear it, prefer JBL, exaggerated upper frequencies, a narrow and closed stage.
@@bayodyofil1926Its not because of that, people prefer the boombox because it has something the sony cant give: deep bass, 50hz and below is something that out of these 2 only the jbl does
A song like "Everybody wants to rule the world" by the musical group "Tears for Fears" must sound very bad on the Boombox 3, 99.99% of the songs must sound better on the Ult Field 7, 0.01% remaining that are very deep bass test should stand out in the JBL. Greetings
I have both bb3 wifi & ult7. Both are great speaker. Here my suggestion as how i prefer to play it. Pair bb3 wifi with dirac + dolby atmos supported phone (ip13/xiaomi) to get richer soundings. As for ult 7 im pairing it with dirac phone (realme gt) to get more groovy. Then u decide which one suit yours
If the Sony XG300 has 16 watts RMS and we know that the alternating power consumption of the Ult Field 7 is 45 Watts, then what is the true power of the Sony Ult Field 7? Between 35 and 40 Watts RMS. The Sony has better sound engineering.
Marshall Tufton sounds better than all of these;) of these two, but I prefer the ULT7. I like sound more. The Boombox 3 Wi-Fi is exaggerated both in the bass and in the highs and overall I don't really like the sound, I would say it's just noisy and of little musical quality (personal opinion) .
Yes you are right because the jbl bb3 wifi version has 200 watts unlike the regular one which has 180 watts. The wifi version have 1x 80W RMS-subwoofer + 2x 40W RMS-midrange +2x 20W RMS-tweeter and to top it all off, it has 3D dolby atmos which gives that better spatial sound. Have a good day :)
Among the two I prefer the sound of Sony (for quality) JBL and louder in everything (bass, high and medium) but in my opinion it has less audio quality, the best remains Marshall Tufton.
My personal opinion is that Boombox 3 is stronger in everything (high, low and medium) but the overall quality I don't like very much, I prefer Ult7 for the overall audio quality (cost even less).. JBL and only strong in my opinion.
@@passionespeaker I personally can't stand the og boombox 3, it has that old "jbl signature sound" that I don't like. this wifi model and the new party boxes sound more "hi-fi" to my ears. but everyone has their own taste
@@passionespeaker I like the jbl bb3 wifi sound mainly becose of that subwoofer becose I'm basshead but also I can enjoy the clarity that the jbl bb3 wifi have. Also on sony the highs on higher volume are little wierd.
@@passionespeakerBut you are right overall sony is better in classic music like rock or metal the JBL is better in more bassy music like DnB or in lower frequency songs. Have a good day :) (I apologize for any mistakes in my english)
Yo tengo el boombox 3 wifi y estoy super agusto con el me encanta su calidad de sonido y ese bajo super profundo que hace temblar las ventanas de mi casa a pesar de ser pequeño ❤
Sony all the way. Love my ULT Field 7 with ULT2 mode and LDAC turned on.
How to turn on ldac?
@@MusicalsoulsAk Look in the phone bluetooth connection setting or other device BT setting to the device you are connected to.
Sony all the way! In jbl the instruments got loose and only can hear the voices... but the sony stands all together and well balanced, all the way Sony!
You have a wonderful and sensitive ear, congratulations. Those who do not understand balanced and natural presentation, or rather cannot hear it, prefer JBL, exaggerated upper frequencies, a narrow and closed stage.
@@bayodyofil1926Its not because of that, people prefer the boombox because it has something the sony cant give: deep bass, 50hz and below is something that out of these 2 only the jbl does
I'm a big fan of JBL then when i heard sony new ult feature i think i got some new favorite speaker to play on😅
Me quedo con el sony sonido mas claro 👍
Sony sounds open and clean in mids and highs and jbl little clean deep Bass
A song like "Everybody wants to rule the world" by the musical group "Tears for Fears" must sound very bad on the Boombox 3, 99.99% of the songs must sound better on the Ult Field 7, 0.01% remaining that are very deep bass test should stand out in the JBL. Greetings
I have both bb3 wifi & ult7. Both are great speaker. Here my suggestion as how i prefer to play it. Pair bb3 wifi with dirac + dolby atmos supported phone (ip13/xiaomi) to get richer soundings. As for ult 7 im pairing it with dirac phone (realme gt) to get more groovy. Then u decide which one suit yours
Boombox has light years more deep bass and way better treble, mids sound better on the sony on this comparasion
bro you didn't set the sony to ult 2
Sony❤️
Jbl nice 👌🏼 the best
If the Sony XG300 has 16 watts RMS and we know that the alternating power consumption of the Ult Field 7 is 45 Watts, then what is the true power of the Sony Ult Field 7? Between 35 and 40 Watts RMS. The Sony has better sound engineering.
80rms A/B, 100 rms A/C
Hello my friend, i just saw that an update came out for jbl boombox 3 wifi. And i want to ask you if you did it and your thoughts on it.
Jbl is little more deep ❤️. But sony has little more beat❤️
Sony ult 7 wins
JBL boombox 3 WiFi version 23.16.36.60.00 right! Or 24.11.11.60.00?
ソニーは綺麗な音出るけどやっぱ重低音は圧倒的にJBLだよね!!JBLしか勝たん
If you listen outside which speaker sounds better?
Marshall Tufton sounds better than all of these;) of these two, but I prefer the ULT7. I like sound more. The Boombox 3 Wi-Fi is exaggerated both in the bass and in the highs and overall I don't really like the sound, I would say it's just noisy and of little musical quality (personal opinion) .
@@passionespeaker tks you
Great video may Jesus christ bless you
Jbl 💪👍
Sony
Jbl
JBL has more clean sound in my opinion
Yes you are right because the jbl bb3 wifi version has 200 watts unlike the regular one which has 180 watts. The wifi version have 1x 80W RMS-subwoofer + 2x 40W RMS-midrange +2x 20W RMS-tweeter and to top it all off, it has 3D dolby atmos which gives that better spatial sound. Have a good day :)
Among the two I prefer the sound of Sony (for quality) JBL and louder in everything (bass, high and medium) but in my opinion it has less audio quality, the best remains Marshall Tufton.
Sony is harsh, not sure how it can be better sounding with those ugly mids and no upper treble at all
En tus videos dices lo contrario dijiste que es mejor que el boombox 3 wifi xd.
Here, from my side, I think that the jbl boombox 3 has a better overall sound from bass to mids to highs. What is your opinion?
boombox3 < sony ult7 < boombox3 wi-fi
My personal opinion is that Boombox 3 is stronger in everything (high, low and medium) but the overall quality I don't like very much, I prefer Ult7 for the overall audio quality (cost even less).. JBL and only strong in my opinion.
@@passionespeaker I personally can't stand the og boombox 3, it has that old "jbl signature sound" that I don't like. this wifi model and the new party boxes sound more "hi-fi" to my ears. but everyone has their own taste
@@passionespeaker I like the jbl bb3 wifi sound mainly becose of that subwoofer becose I'm basshead but also I can enjoy the clarity that the jbl bb3 wifi have. Also on sony the highs on higher volume are little wierd.
@@passionespeakerBut you are right overall sony is better in classic music like rock or metal the JBL is better in more bassy music like DnB or in lower frequency songs. Have a good day :) (I apologize for any mistakes in my english)
BB3 wifi win🎉🎉🎉
Like me SONY
JBL
Jbl terlalu bising
JBL is trash literally
Sony deeper bass