Imaging at a trillion frames per second | Ramesh Raskar

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ก.ค. 2012
  • www.ted.com Ramesh Raskar presents femto-photography, a new type of imaging so fast it visualizes the world one trillion frames per second, so detailed it shows light itself in motion. This technology may someday be used to build cameras that can look "around" corners or see inside the body without X-rays.
    TEDTalks is a daily video podcast of the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes. Featured speakers have included Al Gore on climate change, Philippe Starck on design, Jill Bolte Taylor on observing her own stroke, Nicholas Negroponte on One Laptop per Child, Jane Goodall on chimpanzees, Bill Gates on malaria and mosquitoes, Pattie Maes on the "Sixth Sense" wearable tech, and "Lost" producer JJ Abrams on the allure of mystery. TED stands for Technology, Entertainment, Design, and TEDTalks cover these topics as well as science, business, development and the arts. Closed captions and translated subtitles in a variety of languages are now available on TED.com, at www.ted.com/translate
    If you have questions or comments about this or other TED videos, please go to support.ted.com
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 3.2K

  • @sayanneogy3079
    @sayanneogy3079 4 ปีที่แล้ว +356

    It took TH-cam 7 years to recommend me this??? This is one of the greatest thing a human can see in their whole lifetime!!!

    • @tijaplace9228
      @tijaplace9228 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Love how everybody is being shocked of the "speed" this video of "catching the light" reached its viewers.

    • @davesims7917
      @davesims7917 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It really isn’t… This is all smoke and mirrors because the camera is only creating computer-generated images by information that they are pre-programming into it… There’s a reason this is seven years old and we haven’t heard about it...it’s because it’s all bullshit pseudoscience

    • @ovencake523
      @ovencake523 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@davesims7917 "This is all smoke and mirrors because the camera is only creating computer-generated images by information that they are pre-programming into it… " That's what all cameras do. Why does this completely normal factor of all cameras make this pseudoscience?

    • @mohammedimrankakmohiddina1695
      @mohammedimrankakmohiddina1695 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Same here

    • @atharvapande1373
      @atharvapande1373 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      8 to me

  • @icantthinkofaname1483
    @icantthinkofaname1483 8 ปีที่แล้ว +400

    As a PC gamer I can confirm that if you play under a trillion frames per second, you're a filthy casual

    • @lenatraceroxton1363
      @lenatraceroxton1363 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      2 trillion get on my level bruh!

    • @OleBerg1
      @OleBerg1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Dont start telling me you cant notice a difference between this and 140fps, i clearly do, i just know i do.

    • @LuizDahoraavida
      @LuizDahoraavida 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      But the human eye can only see 10fps xdddddd

    • @LuizDahoraavida
      @LuizDahoraavida 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Will Hedley U fkng skrub, 1v1 me

    • @edgeoftime5432
      @edgeoftime5432 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      i would like to see a solar eclipse with that camera

  • @erictaylor5462
    @erictaylor5462 4 ปีที่แล้ว +182

    7 years and this is still the coolest TED talk

    • @arunsharma-ze1sl
      @arunsharma-ze1sl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      this along with 6th sensse technology by Pranav Mistry TED Video

    • @johnnym6700
      @johnnym6700 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      They didn't use a laser but white light. The light would have dispersed when it hit the bottle and then water. The shape of the 'bullet' of light is also wrong and should have the same cross section from front to back. The shape of the 'bullet' of light seems to change along the length of the bottle indicating that the separate photons have different light speeds? How is it possible to switch the source light on and off in such a short time? (approx 10e-11s)? Its amazing every comment here praises the experiment without question. In my opinion the experiment was contrived and animated. Coolest TED talk? More like coolest TED lies!

    • @arunsharma-ze1sl
      @arunsharma-ze1sl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@johnnym6700 even if they had used laser light i think its still a very big achievement because laser light also travel with speed of white light . This techology can be used in many things .

    • @johnnym6700
      @johnnym6700 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@arunsharma-ze1sl Sorry not possible. Fake experiment. Did you not read what I said? What technology?

    • @arunsharma-ze1sl
      @arunsharma-ze1sl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@johnnym6700 ,TED is a very reputed platform this guy is from MIT i dont think they will do fake stuff . The detail technical aspects you are talking about people from quantum mechanics better comment about it not i may be you are something missing .

  • @benjaminwebb5759
    @benjaminwebb5759 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I told my dad that if the sun went dark we wouldn't know it for 8 minutes. His response was, "why did you have to tell me that".
    Science is a passion for me. This is a revelation. We see light with our eyes as being instantaneous but it's not. It's one of the fundamental things people should know.

    • @jackzanone6180
      @jackzanone6180 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nobody thinks you are a genius because of this by the way

  • @DyingToLive310
    @DyingToLive310 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3222

    Who the hell was his audience? These people just saw the speed of light, the fastest speed there is in our world. And they saw it slowed down enough to see it move in SLOW MOTION! Do they not understand what they just saw? The audience at the iPhone 5 was more excited than these people. This is easily one of the most incredible advances in science! The ability to see the speed of light... it's pretty fucking awesome people, get hype!

    • @johnhancock975
      @johnhancock975 8 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      +Second Zeta Without light, there is no angry birds

    • @racso5628
      @racso5628 8 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      +Slevin Reviews This isn't my first time watching, but the first time I've looked at the comments and I agree with you. I was just amazed that people weren't shouting and cheering. As another commenter said, why didn't people stop me in the streets about this stuff. This is AMAZING stuff.

    • @DyingToLive310
      @DyingToLive310 8 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Oscar Conroy Maybe they aren't aware of this technological breakthrough. Being able to slow down the speed of light, enough to observe and study it, will provide science/engineering a whole new field to to draw inventions from. It's the fastest moving thing in existence.

    • @bernardfinucane2061
      @bernardfinucane2061 7 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      As brilliant and amazing as this is, it's a computer animation based on a composition of repeated exposures, not a recording of a live action event.

    • @enverko
      @enverko 7 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Slevin Reviews when I am amazed I usually don't say a word for minutes because I'm left speechless. I would not be surprised if none of them said a word.

  • @7come11two
    @7come11two 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    A well deserved standing ovation. We can hardly imagine what we may discover by observing light in slow motion.

  • @davidgounden7395
    @davidgounden7395 4 ปีที่แล้ว +261

    And I still can’t get 60 frames on a dam PlayStation

    • @atartup
      @atartup 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@thejam7129 you can't get it on Xbox either

    • @blink5394
      @blink5394 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@atartup pc master race

    • @realprisec
      @realprisec 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thejam7129 go to the doctor you idiot

    • @medspecgaming1363
      @medspecgaming1363 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      PC is also same.

    • @rich1051414
      @rich1051414 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If you do the same scene over and over again, and merge your frames, you can get 60 frames per second :) That is exactly how this is done.

  • @papicholo623
    @papicholo623 4 ปีที่แล้ว +119

    TED: imaging a trillion frames per second
    Console players: but...but the eyes can only see 60 frames per second

    • @TheAviationistKhizr
      @TheAviationistKhizr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I believe the human eye can see up to 1000fps but gamers are just sad

    • @jaggerjdm9787
      @jaggerjdm9787 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@TheAviationistKhizr Literally nobody asked you. What's sad is posting videos of roller coasters on youtube.

    • @TheAviationistKhizr
      @TheAviationistKhizr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@jaggerjdm9787 No what's sad is posting animations and using bandicam screen recorder with a massive f watermark. Also no one asked you to use TH-cam, no one asked you to watch this video, no one asked you to look in the comments and no one asked you to reply to my comment. So if you've got a problem then just leave moron.

    • @pallav8725
      @pallav8725 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@TheAviationistKhizr I second this

    • @TheAviationistKhizr
      @TheAviationistKhizr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pallav8725 appreciate it dude 😉

  • @jasonflaherty8364
    @jasonflaherty8364 9 ปีที่แล้ว +710

    This is the most incredible thing I've ever seen! But why aren't they redoing the double-slit experiment? I would love to see wave-particle duality in action. From what I can tell here, it's less a duality and more... splashy.
    And why am I just now hearing about this? This is from 2012! People should have been stopping me in the street to tell me about this.

    • @EvanLiu_official
      @EvanLiu_official 9 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Me too! The duality! Count my vote here!

    • @Mephistolomaniac
      @Mephistolomaniac 8 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Jason Flaherty I agree it would be interesting to see, but if i was a betting man i'd say that we would still be performing a measurement, and the result would be much the same as with any other measurement. Particle behavior

    • @paneesh
      @paneesh 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      +Jason Flaherty I so much wish Vsauce doing a double slit experiment with this incredible camera.

    • @artz6621
      @artz6621 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      +Jason Flaherty SAME HERE! WHY AM I SEEING THIS JUST NOW???

    • @zuzusuperfly8363
      @zuzusuperfly8363 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      +Mephistolomaniac You're absolutely right, and I think it's important that people understand this point. *If you know what slit the light is going through, expect particle behavior. It's when you don't know where the light is that nature is at her cheekiest.*

  • @TheFable2010
    @TheFable2010 5 ปีที่แล้ว +192

    this just blew my mind and it happened 6 years ago.... how has nobody told me this
    Edit: oh yeah I have no friends

    • @smartypants4571
      @smartypants4571 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I always try to make friends but rarely am able to make them !

    • @ShubhamGupta-wt5fq
      @ShubhamGupta-wt5fq 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hmmm...we can be friends

    • @nugyenshan2678
      @nugyenshan2678 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me too ,

    • @franknada8235
      @franknada8235 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      When it first got published, I posted an article about this (video inlay) on Scheißbook.
      Result: 1 like
      I published a photo of a really nice drink with tapas food.
      Result: 68 likes
      I published a good profile shot of myself which doesn't matter.
      Result: 113 likes
      But even that is not the punchline.
      These people are all eligible to vote.

    • @RErnie-gv1hv
      @RErnie-gv1hv 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@franknada8235 And breed. And drive.

  • @AnthonySenpaikun
    @AnthonySenpaikun 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I also saw this put into use by archaeologists to scan an entire area of a abandoned village. What they found was absolutely amazing. just with a flicker of light, they were able to map the entire surrounding area plus find hidden tombs or underground rooms/areas, never before seen.

    • @michaelblair5146
      @michaelblair5146 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      yeah, I realied a possible use after watching this. on a galactic level, consider gamma ray bursts or other frequency light distributions that occur from bursts or explosions of stars. if you were a neigh omnipotent existence with unlimited computational potential you could scientifically use this strategy to map sectors of the galaxy. Sure, the immediate few light years are destroyed to generate the power needed for the scan, as well as the star itself, or even potentially not. he'll, you could scan an area of space and use the refracted back light to tell you about what existed there if you are some 4th dimensional existence where time isn't felt as linear. it wouldn't matter by the time it reached bounced off the planet and reached back to you it was destroyed/the planets relative time everything on it was long dead, you could still access it by "pulling up" that snapshot of space to explore the data set further. Especially if you could interpret everything as data and reverse it back into what it was with perfect comprehension.

  • @DevyaniPatil333
    @DevyaniPatil333 4 ปีที่แล้ว +306

    So TH-cam basically decided to recommend this to me in 2019

    • @Mr_Cap.
      @Mr_Cap. 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hmm
      Right..

    • @tokyoDRIFTA
      @tokyoDRIFTA 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Devyani Patil thats so cool bro

    • @pada5009
      @pada5009 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly

    • @doms6741
      @doms6741 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Saw this ages ago. It's back

    • @charan2446
      @charan2446 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I got in 2020 march

  • @-Markus-
    @-Markus- 7 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    This is well spent 11min, wish there were more about this topic.

    • @2Nelly4
      @2Nelly4 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Marcus Sundbom exactly..

    • @zaaz4046
      @zaaz4046 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      True

    • @hpprototyping9478
      @hpprototyping9478 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was short, But, not that short as a "light bullet" if you watched the video:
      - femtophotography.info

    • @jordancairnes1539
      @jordancairnes1539 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Infinite division of time

    • @s1l3nttt
      @s1l3nttt 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      its bullshit are u stupid or what???

  • @allengarrison9578
    @allengarrison9578 8 ปีที่แล้ว +730

    Double Slit experiment please....

    • @Arzorn
      @Arzorn 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      that would be awesome!

    • @dhruv1863
      @dhruv1863 7 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      It is not possible. Experiment is based on photons, we can see it in high speed, but not magnify it to photon level

    • @MrPomboskate
      @MrPomboskate 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      no. its just light from a laser

    • @MonoLith2049
      @MonoLith2049 7 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      the light would probably change its behaviour when it's being watched. i agree though, give it a try and make it possible

    • @manictiger
      @manictiger 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      +mono lith
      We really need to get an answer to that. It's such a crazy thing--
      That you can just look at particles and they change on a quantum level.

  • @teippiviritykset
    @teippiviritykset 4 ปีที่แล้ว +258

    2012: we have trillion fps camera, soon in your phone
    2019, Iphone: can't adjust the camera settings yet.. we chose you 4:3

    • @powerbutton679
      @powerbutton679 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      But you can though...

    • @ian8527
      @ian8527 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@powerbutton679 Not completely, at least

    • @ayushp.5395
      @ayushp.5395 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ian8527
      Why does no one use open camera???
      I mean many do but no one talks about it...

    • @thejam7129
      @thejam7129 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can if you pay for one of those $20 apps

    • @ayushp.5395
      @ayushp.5395 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@thejam7129
      Well, not on iOS, on Android smartphones...

  • @sagerlover95
    @sagerlover95 4 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    2019 viewer here. That last line, "It's about time", did not get enough credit

    • @nickm9134
      @nickm9134 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I was actually thinking the same exact thing when he said it.

    • @estinsidebottom
      @estinsidebottom 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      2020 Viewer Here. I Absolutely Agree.

    • @thesoundsmith
      @thesoundsmith 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Science abhors a pun like nature abhors a Dyson...

    • @SustainaBIT
      @SustainaBIT 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      2021 and still agree 0_0

  • @Valentine350z
    @Valentine350z 5 ปีที่แล้ว +408

    Its 2018 and I just saw this. What has happened since then and why people aren't aware of this? Shouldn't it have been plastered all over the news as a major breakthrough? Or I was just living under a rock this whole time ...

    • @4647540
      @4647540 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Valentine yeah.... agree

    • @sans9695
      @sans9695 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ik right

    • @priyabratadash4542
      @priyabratadash4542 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I saw it today 😂

    • @NipapornP
      @NipapornP 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Seems, it wasn't THAT spectacular as it was represented. I guess, because it's just usable for still images, and not for moving things. So, what's the point? Maybe usable for some particular science cases, but that's it.

    • @lucca3113
      @lucca3113 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Nii P. it's not just just used for still images, they literally showed you the camera recording at the a 10 billionth of a second.

  • @avelinodavila8183
    @avelinodavila8183 8 ปีที่แล้ว +105

    They should implement femto photography into the large hadron collider! That would be interesting

    • @Feynstein100
      @Feynstein100 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Avelino Davila Brilliant idea! Faith in humanity restored.

    • @almostbauws1845
      @almostbauws1845 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      +Feynstein100 no it isnt. Femto cameras dont work like that.

    • @Feynstein100
      @Feynstein100 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Almostbauws
      Yeah I guess. They'd have to do the same experiment millions of times.

    • @almostbauws1845
      @almostbauws1845 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ***** yes and it would be almost impossible. And not millions, but billion times.

    • @downstream0114
      @downstream0114 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Feynstein100 The LHC does 10 million collisions a second. This technology, despite its vast number of potential applications, isn't suited for imaging collisions in the LHC, that's what they have their detector for.

  • @dpkdz
    @dpkdz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    Me : see how much the technology has improved today.
    Also me : wait.. it's 7 years old

    • @ripper4092
      @ripper4092 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol me too

    • @puckry9686
      @puckry9686 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It now 10trillion fps by caltech

    • @moniadixit28
      @moniadixit28 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha right

    • @nevertheless123
      @nevertheless123 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No its actually 30 years old...this Raskar guy is a phoney, he is simply using a camera (called streak camera) that scientists have known about and using for many years. There was even a nobel price in 1998 for femtosecond spectroscopy. This guy is showing light going through a coke bottle, which is useless, will only work for TED talks which are all useless anyways.

    • @pixxel5392
      @pixxel5392 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nevertheless123 well he is much successful and doing something with his life unlike you

  • @raphaelyang4065
    @raphaelyang4065 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That last line was almost like a punchline in a stand-up comedy - It's about time. Loved it!

  • @scahsaint6249
    @scahsaint6249 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2661

    Screw scientific applications. I can finally take a picture of my wife with her mouth shut. My life is now complete.

    • @J8C5T
      @J8C5T 9 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Hilarious!

    • @Bretaigne
      @Bretaigne 9 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Scah Saint
      This is so adult humor lol

    • @TheNja09
      @TheNja09 9 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Items needed for light project:100,000,000,000,000 phonesall on camera
      slow motion
      you are welcome

    • @Scawking
      @Scawking 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Walrus Maybe he found someone with a sense of humor.

    • @artz6621
      @artz6621 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Scah Saint HEYOOO :)

  • @frankservant5754
    @frankservant5754 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I used this video for presentation during my final year course in Lasers and optics some years ago and I got the highest mark!

  • @1SimpleLife
    @1SimpleLife 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    2020, first time seeing slow mo of a light beam. Amazing as it is, until I realize the talk was given 8 years ago! Now, isn't that something!

    • @alienlabs
      @alienlabs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No it isn't :) Because it's not a slow-motion video. It's a time-lapse built out of frames taken out of several events. Still amazing synch and timing, tho. But not a slow-mo video.

  • @SaraBearRawr0312
    @SaraBearRawr0312 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Since i first found this video back in 2013 i have rewatched it probably 10 times either on my own or sharing it with others. This is amazing that we are seeing an event that moves at a speed so mind boggling fast and its not just interpolated data on a paper, it is actually physically visible in a way that no one thought could feasibly be witnessed.

  • @godblessamerica4025
    @godblessamerica4025 9 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    A fantastic presentation by Mr. Ramesh, the concept is just awesome. But what was with the Audience - could they have been any less enthused?

    • @NipapornP
      @NipapornP 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Isn't that obvious? They like Pepsi.

    • @Toven_WaveWatcherFi
      @Toven_WaveWatcherFi 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I think the audience did a pretty fine job. They applauded, laughed at the right moments and even stood up at the end. Tf did you want them to do, scream like it was a concert?

    • @pimpompoom93726
      @pimpompoom93726 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@NipapornP Well played!

    • @alone_mask
      @alone_mask 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      They were social and commerce students

    • @Qujsjs
      @Qujsjs ปีที่แล้ว

      They are gender studies major

  • @ColdHT69
    @ColdHT69 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Extremely interesting and well presented!! Thanks for that TT.

  • @jayprrr1974
    @jayprrr1974 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    AMAZING!!!!
    THIS GUY put his life to good use👍👍

  • @TheBlazewadaTalks
    @TheBlazewadaTalks 4 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    Dude(speaking from future 2019),you talk of changing the future,but no one knows about this research.....

    • @kelly74
      @kelly74 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      *,theme song from MIB starts to filter through

    • @judithreyes4664
      @judithreyes4664 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The future happened at Fento speed that’s why we didn’t hear about it ... I finally saw this in 2019.

  • @djrezafication5872
    @djrezafication5872 8 ปีที่แล้ว +267

    They aren't really taking a video of a single event. They are repeating the event a trillion times and taking frames at different instances in time to get one full event. So if you think you can use this as a slow-mo camera to capture a water balloon bursting, you better have a LOT of water balloons...

    • @JonnieQuestsStars
      @JonnieQuestsStars 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I think you wrong on this one. This camera sees light around corners, by capturing the light when it returns.

    • @jonnypanteloni
      @jonnypanteloni 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      +DJrezafication "resimulated many times" - last time i threw caution to the wind when i heard that. now i think twice yes, it must be run again and again.

    • @sleepysnoot8881
      @sleepysnoot8881 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +DJrezafication it's relative, this is how light works, it's doing all over and over again, our cameras do these things too, only at 60 or 30 fps.

    • @jonnypanteloni
      @jonnypanteloni 8 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Miseew No he means the light beam is fired multiple times and the camera is actually recording millions of simulations of a light beam being fired and compositing it into one sequence.

    • @djrezafication5872
      @djrezafication5872 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      +jonnypanteloni Yes, there are no sensors, no electronic components, no CPUs available that are fast enough to capture a single beam of light as it travels a trajectory that short.

  • @user-oc2by1bw3g
    @user-oc2by1bw3g 7 ปีที่แล้ว +325

    Wow I'm 4 years late

  • @sayanneogy3079
    @sayanneogy3079 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The coolest and best Ted talk ever seen and undoubtedly one of the best video in whole TH-cam !!!

  • @shashankjadhav9053
    @shashankjadhav9053 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Epic! Very intelligent man Ramesh Raskar ! Love you and your teams ability
    .

  • @AdMBandLeader
    @AdMBandLeader 4 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    A talk from 2012 and it's 2019 now. 7 years hence, no implementation of this tech. Something's wrong with either the tech itself or the people who pass patents.

    • @piotrd.4850
      @piotrd.4850 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Most probably investors want to put their money into facebook-like apps... and competition like X-ray is well established.

    • @yodxnavon
      @yodxnavon 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Idk I feel like technology is far more ahead than we know ? They just keep us a couple years behind

    • @asbjornld
      @asbjornld 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Well, it's data heavy, and needs large and expensive equipment. Not everything can be scaled yet.

    • @alienlabs
      @alienlabs 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's the tech, really. It's just an amazingly accurate timer that takes one photo per photon packet, just one femto second after the other, forming a time-lapse. Not really a slow-motion camera :) Amazing synch, nothing to say about that... but wrong sensationalistic aproach.

  • @lynxthirtytwo
    @lynxthirtytwo 10 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    This is groundbreaking and I can't believe I hadn't seen it until now! We really need to reevaluate our priorities as a species; I'd much rather have seen this on CNN than Justin Bieber's latest offense. That was the day I quit going to them for news.
    Also, notice how you can't see the light until it refracts through the medium? In other words, if there hadn't been a water bottle in the way we would never have seen the pulse. This is obvious to most, but it is fascinating to actually see it in action!! Astounding...

    • @Swallabat
      @Swallabat 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good spot. If you aren't already in the field of alternative physics, we need a few more like you that can use their eyes & brain in concert! (providing you have a strong stomach, you do have to pick the few gems out of a load of stinking bulls***)

    • @katiekat4457
      @katiekat4457 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      lynx tamer i think we already knew that because light seems invisible and we only see the affects of it bouncing off of all the objects. Otherwise we would be seeing the light and colors streaming by our eyes and filling the room all of the time. But that was very observant of you. I need to rewatch this to see what else I missed.

    • @donaldtrump5489
      @donaldtrump5489 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      fake news

  • @jengl_exe
    @jengl_exe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    First TED talk I ever watched. I still come back to it after 7 years

  • @DarkstarAndrew01
    @DarkstarAndrew01 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This gave me chills, very cool! Thank you.

  • @VamsiKrishnavamsshy
    @VamsiKrishnavamsshy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Now thats what we call a perfect standing ovation

  • @1nzi
    @1nzi 9 ปีที่แล้ว +696

    Why not take the Coca-Cola label off?

    • @benplus2053
      @benplus2053 8 ปีที่แล้ว +81

      +1nzi
      "Coca cola did not sponsor this research. * fake grins * i just picked a random bottle and made sure to placed it in such way so the logo can be easily read,just so you know im not selling out or doing commercials for anyone"
      I dont know who does the Hindu guy think he is fooling but not me that's for sure, its clear that he is doing cola commercial.

    • @TheAzrai
      @TheAzrai 8 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      +hategoogle plus Yeah he really was insulting everyone's intelligence with that. He knew this would be absolutely groundbreaking video footage, and his lab likely shopped around. I know it's a small quibble, but this honestly put a damper on the whole presentation for me. I detest blatant dishonesty.

    • @ewan8585
      @ewan8585 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      +1nzi Sponsorship monies...

    • @zaaz4046
      @zaaz4046 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      He must have monetized from Coke as well.

    • @sid98geek
      @sid98geek 6 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Maybe they wanted to see how the light reflected off an opaque label, as rest of the bottle is translucent. :P

  • @anirudhpuranik5222
    @anirudhpuranik5222 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of those TED talks on science which I can completely watch till the end. Beautiful innovations.

  • @pipsester
    @pipsester 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The best presentation of finding through research ❤️

  • @talesdemidioful
    @talesdemidioful 9 ปีที่แล้ว +271

    2 minutes footage = 10 yottabytes xD

    • @dog9302
      @dog9302 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Tales Demidio yea how tf can they store that

    • @kylebryce2186
      @kylebryce2186 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      They don't capture very many images. They may only capture about 100 images in total (I'm just saying 100 as an example. I don't know how many). Our own brain can comprehend about 24 frames per second, so 100 frames can produce a smooth 4 second video for us. Hope this makes sense.

    • @JohnSmith-jw3ko
      @JohnSmith-jw3ko 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tales Demidio 7h byh

    • @ivar2859
      @ivar2859 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Not exactly true, the human brain interprets visual motion with a frequency of around 7-24 Hz. However, when interpreting visual information, some studies have shown that certain individuals (trained fighter pilots) can interpret what is presented to them visually in 1/220th of a second. This corresponds to 220 fps. The brain doesn't process "frames" but more or less direct light, so it's a tricky question. This website does a good job explaining it:
      www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm

    • @nightrous3026
      @nightrous3026 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      They dont need that much storage. The recordings themselves are less than a picosecond long.

  • @ashishpatole1978
    @ashishpatole1978 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    hyper lens, femto and Li-Fi technologies will valuable ... precious...

  • @PaulMahabir
    @PaulMahabir 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Incredible. Seeing round corners. Utterly amazing.

  • @paragkulkarni187
    @paragkulkarni187 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have met this man in personnel. Very humble, down to earth personally. Ramesh has got number of unbelievable achievement in very short time. I am proud that, he is from my hometown. Congratulations 💐

  • @4fsfilms328
    @4fsfilms328 8 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Technology is amazing! I can't wait a few years to have a femto-camera in my cellphone

    • @almostbauws1845
      @almostbauws1845 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yes, femto camera.The most useless camera in the world, because you cant use it for anything.

    • @FitSmart.ItsArt
      @FitSmart.ItsArt 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      +Almostbauws He mentioned the uses. Watch the video before commenting.

    • @almostbauws1845
      @almostbauws1845 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Aerys Zoldyk for normal people they are useless

    • @zach3096
      @zach3096 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      For normal people? You mean the people that scientists make touchscreen cellphones for? Or how about your computer? There's plenty of uses for it, but I can tell you're a bit slow so it's not worth it to bother to explain.

    • @almostbauws1845
      @almostbauws1845 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Cosmos You have to repeat the same thing again a million times perfectly to get this video.

  • @vjpcubes
    @vjpcubes 10 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    so how long until someone points this camera at the dual slit experiment?

    • @XxCallofDutyManiacxX
      @XxCallofDutyManiacxX 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@m ・ ́ω・ where did you hear that it? So youre saying if we could somehow observe the electrons without electromagnetic radiation that we WOULD see a wave??

  • @eTaupe
    @eTaupe 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Stunning. Groundbreaking ...

  • @nylonsteel
    @nylonsteel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for shedding light on the subject

  • @Barnacules
    @Barnacules 5 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Now put this in a smartphone so my laser pointer looks like a light saber!

    • @siddhantmishra3598
      @siddhantmishra3598 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Check out styropyro in his recent videos he has demonstrated this

  • @tanmeh3
    @tanmeh3 8 ปีที่แล้ว +165

    So anyone tried double slit experiment with femto-photography yet?!!

    • @KamranYounis1
      @KamranYounis1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      What would be the point, the electrons some how know when we are measuring it anyway.

    • @KamranYounis1
      @KamranYounis1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ***** What?

    • @carpetmonk
      @carpetmonk 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      that is a brilliant question

    • @carpetmonk
      @carpetmonk 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      revisit the michealson morely experiment

    • @rootz420
      @rootz420 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kamran Younis what do you mean?

  • @mirrorflame1988
    @mirrorflame1988 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing! This is truly awesome!

  • @JohnKooz
    @JohnKooz ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the praise in the comments for this TED Talk. This whole concept, technology, and optical science is fascinating, but more importantly the pace, articulation, and overall just extremely well-communicated message was superb!

  • @wasabiwhatsup
    @wasabiwhatsup 10 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Mind blown. I'ma go make myself a sammich now.

  • @christophercalvo3512
    @christophercalvo3512 10 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This is truly amazing research. Also, Ramesh is a great speaker and truly captivating the way he talks about his research.

  • @enjoycutness
    @enjoycutness ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WOW. What i learn today. We are really indebted to such a million years ahead thinking scientist. congratulation sir and thanks TED.

  • @mo1st_codered114
    @mo1st_codered114 ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolutely mind blowing

  • @vashybhoot
    @vashybhoot 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Amazing .. you rock Ramesh 🌈

  • @johnhobson5052
    @johnhobson5052 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is so exciting! I can't wait to see where this will end up in ten years, or maybe even as soon as five years. Technology is moving so quickly, there's no telling what will be done with this breakthrough!

    • @Tommastein
      @Tommastein 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      nothing as of now. 6 years have passed 😐

    • @SubAtomicFabric
      @SubAtomicFabric ปีที่แล้ว

      Nothing available now, 10 years have passed

  • @stanhickerson5768
    @stanhickerson5768 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I never dreamed I'd see this in my life time. Thank you all so much!

  • @bluceree7312
    @bluceree7312 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    WOW! really the best video on TH-cam. I've always thougth about those very very very fast time scales. Amazing.

  • @taajlewis6204
    @taajlewis6204 7 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Wish my computer was that fast.

    • @madlife7274
      @madlife7274 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      my neighbour tried to run Batttlefield on his intel graphic ...

    • @shubhampreetsingh8630
      @shubhampreetsingh8630 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@madlife7274 You should've called 911, because you witnessed an attempt to murder!

  • @RifqiIchsanNuraziizi
    @RifqiIchsanNuraziizi 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    this innovation, make me feel like live in a cave. this is terrific!!
    a light speed camera

  • @richfiles
    @richfiles 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A friend showed me a NOVA video that covers this, point by point... 9 years later. I told him I had *this* video from a decade earlier... Bullet through Apple, coke bottle, tomato, looking around corners... Everyone awes at the demonstration, but I hope this is being developed and grown, and not just the same old experiments repeated for the next video crew to film. One thing that _has_ come true, is that mobile devices have gotten cameras that arent just more megapixels, but record in much lower levels of light and at much higher frame rates. Good to see that prediction come to fruition.

  • @nontology
    @nontology 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    absolutely astonishing

  • @ralbatros9
    @ralbatros9 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    887 dislikes from conventional camera producers? I want to believe that they also liked this.

    • @alienlabs
      @alienlabs 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Some might be from people who hated this to be advertised as a "faster than light camera to take slow-mo videos of light" instead of "Synchronization tool to take timelapse frames with 1 femtosecond of increment on the timer". Precise and amazing? Yes. No slow-mo video, tho.

  • @Ayan44
    @Ayan44 9 ปีที่แล้ว +108

    two ladies didn't clap at the end

    • @zaaz4046
      @zaaz4046 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Probably they were not Indians.

    • @Cybergrip1
      @Cybergrip1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Perhaps they are part of the team or related and heard it a thousand times.

    • @dimitriyabramchuk5264
      @dimitriyabramchuk5264 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I saw 3 ladies who weren't clapping. And possibly 1 male too. :)

    • @FrancisMaxino
      @FrancisMaxino 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They were the military intelligence operatives who realised what they were seeing and weren't clapping because they realised the implications of India having this technology before anyone else.

    • @73rmin47or
      @73rmin47or 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Leave them alone....

  • @bobbyvinyle3389
    @bobbyvinyle3389 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Simply amazing. This is an astonishing breakthrough..femto camera technology...now 2018. To what level has this technology evolved? Unbelievable and very very good presentation! Thank you.

  • @himantasaikia8724
    @himantasaikia8724 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well spoken.

  • @MaQuGo119
    @MaQuGo119 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Amazing accent

  • @Stick265
    @Stick265 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    HAH That man was geekin when he said "It's about time" I love it

  • @TanvirHossain-gd7zn
    @TanvirHossain-gd7zn 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mankind salutes you for such brilliant invention. Thanks to you guys today I saw the next Dimension of photography.

  • @jampako
    @jampako 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is probably the coolest piece of technology I've seen in my lifetime. We're watching photons in motion!

  • @karrskarr
    @karrskarr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Second watch in 2019-Still I am in awe! :P

  • @ar_xiv
    @ar_xiv 7 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    what's going on with the tomato? it looks like cg? I think I'm missing something here
    edit: it's a plastic tomato lol

    • @Psycandy
      @Psycandy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      there are sub-surface scattering controls in CG that work on similar parameters, so it would look like CG, well spotted

  • @erictaylor5462
    @erictaylor5462 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    7 years, *STILL* the coolest TED talk ever

  • @mr.b.w.3146
    @mr.b.w.3146 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating. Seeing light slowed down - What a hoot!

  • @ghabila5996
    @ghabila5996 7 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    May be it's better to remove the Coca-Cola adv.

    • @NRV2510
      @NRV2510 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      why ? funds is mater for the great research, focus on Genius technology please, thank u

  • @vijayadixit6009
    @vijayadixit6009 5 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    4:12 I thought it was an apple

  • @sunilpatkar9294
    @sunilpatkar9294 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ramesh ji
    Khup chhan explain kalat

  • @abhishekdev258
    @abhishekdev258 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot.

  • @crlsprz11
    @crlsprz11 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    There's something we should all understand before watching this video. We're not really observing a moving photon, that would be phisically impossible.
    Cameras produce images from the information given by the photons that the recorded object emits. We simply can't see a moving photon because the camera needs to obtain these information (given by the photons themselves) in order to build the image, and it'd be necessary to have "something" faster than the photon the camera is "recording" in order to "see" it, so, it's meaningless trying to "record" a photon with a camera .
    In this universe, the speed of light is a physical limit, it's impossible to overcome it beacuse that's the speed a particle can reach if it gets INFINITE energy. It is possible to get closer to it, we can reach 90% of it with a really huge amount of energy, with a way more huge amount of energy we'd reach 99%, then 99,9%, 99,99%... 99,99999999%, but we would never ever reach 100% or more; it would be necessary an infinite amount of energy. What we're seeing here is a complex reconstruction of photon trajectory after shooting millions of them. Something quite remarkable and interesting, no doubt of it. But it's certainly not "a single moving photon".
    So, it's meaningless to "prove this technology with the double slit experiment", although it can seem very interesting.

    • @4647540
      @4647540 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      crlsprz11 yeah I agree.....it's just a complesx reconstruction of photons trajectories over millions of time....hey I want to know does it makes some compromise on creating image of event because physical information get changed every time a photon hit matter and it can't detact all of it.....is it so?🤔

    • @katiekat4457
      @katiekat4457 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      crlsprz11 i didn’t bother to read your whole comment because just the first paragraph was enough to get the gist. You have no idea what the technology and instrumentations that are being used by his “camera”. It may not be camera like at all and he just uses that terminology so the average person can understand. There are probably no frames involved but only and a terminology used so that he could equate the math and the speed difference to the masses. Once you actually know what this is that is capturing the imagine then rewrite your comment. You have made a lot of assumptions about something he has said absolutely nothing about.

    • @FrancisMaxino
      @FrancisMaxino 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, it is not impossible to photograph a bundle of photons because as that bundle travels, as they have done with the laser burst through water, the photons reaching the camera to create the image are showing the larger bundle of photons they came from itself. Nowhere is he claiming it is a single photon in the coke bottle slow mo.

    • @michaelblair5146
      @michaelblair5146 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Duh. He said it was millions of tries and stitched together. Why did you think we didn't know?

  • @pillettadoinswartsh4974
    @pillettadoinswartsh4974 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    What a coincidence. My children are named, Atto, Femto, Pico, Nano, Micro and Milli.
    Funny story: Milli is the only one who doesn't get teased about her name.

    • @MyFAT69
      @MyFAT69 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Milli Vannilly :P

    • @eye-yamstewpeed8254
      @eye-yamstewpeed8254 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      BOKU NO PICO

    • @ahuttee
      @ahuttee 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eye-yamstewpeed8254 *no*

  • @garyphilpott255
    @garyphilpott255 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Probably because I waited half my life for images of photons in (slow) motion, I'm as impressed with Ramesh Raksar's film now as I was when I first saw it a few years ago. Give that man a Nobel prize!

  • @world_conquerer
    @world_conquerer 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's fascinating

  • @lavascript4439
    @lavascript4439 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    We need to perform the double slit with femtophotography! Maybe then we can understand the paradox of light being a particle, a wave, or something else!

  • @kygodragon4782
    @kygodragon4782 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Phewwwwwwwwwwww!!! JUST finished watching the video of the bullet going through a coke bottle...it was a long year but was worth it, you will never get the twist...trust me

  • @samirbadri9673
    @samirbadri9673 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Totally awesome ...

  • @stickycasket2914
    @stickycasket2914 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Это потрясающе! Спасибо.

  • @copernicus6420
    @copernicus6420 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    it is impressive that those high tech images shows nothing contrary to the accepted theories of light.

  • @staezione
    @staezione 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you, come again

  • @abbyboing
    @abbyboing 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can’t understand how a person would even dislike this video after watching it? You just experienced and saw light before dying out dude, respect that.

  • @kurtiswichmann4699
    @kurtiswichmann4699 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    FANTASTIC!

  • @hjeffcoat42
    @hjeffcoat42 10 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Oh how Gavin Free wishes he has this camera.

  • @PhantomKode
    @PhantomKode 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is unbelievable. I had no idea we were capable of this.

  • @markyounger1240
    @markyounger1240 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seeing around corners with bounced photons. We've been doing that for hundreds of years. We call it a mirror. What he is doing is cool, but redirecting photons is old, not new. His new way has exciting applications though.

  • @erikprochazka699
    @erikprochazka699 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great, thanks

  • @jameswaikhom8892
    @jameswaikhom8892 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    me watching in 2019, August 24...interesting. 👍

  • @MrWilsonVolleyBall
    @MrWilsonVolleyBall 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    what microprocessor they use for this

    • @MrMamanDon
      @MrMamanDon 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think they would have used some experimental 256-bit bus capable microprocessor with custom instruction sets to attain sky-high clock speeds rigged with raid SSDs or heck even RAMs for primary storae of the photos.

    • @vijayabhaskarj3095
      @vijayabhaskarj3095 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      8086

    • @osamabinladen824
      @osamabinladen824 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wilson!

  • @johnthatcher2349
    @johnthatcher2349 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting and well explained

  • @tonylouisvisionvideography3469
    @tonylouisvisionvideography3469 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    INCREDIBLE!