Great video - I wish the was a little bit longer and it wasnt wet. I like how the bike pulls in the f1 quite heavily after they reach roughly. This is were the torque plays a larger role compared to ultimate tracktion. Either way they are crazy fast.
Thing about it is , it wouldn't be fair. The bike would have the tendancy to wheelie , can't use full power while wheeliing for obvious reason. And the f1 car would have to hit high revs to use full power to keep from spinning out.
The max engine capacity was actually 990cc starting in 02, 800cc after 07, and 1000 in '12. I doubt they were using a current bike so it was most likely pre-07 meaning 990cc. Also I was never arguing price. I just said the top classes of cars are faster than the top classes of bikes and that's the truth. Look up some actual times instead of spewing bullshit. The only record I can think of off the top of my head that a bike holds is the standing mile and we'll see how long that lasts.
this is for S1And3ron, its 'Qatar' with a 'Q' but i like that you were impressed. after 1985 the gp race of france went to lemans, before that it was at paul ricard. nowadays they rent ricard to set up bikes. the motogp class now (800s) is 333lbs. eddie lawson testing at ricard in 1986. 500cc two stroke v-4 "236"lbs went down the back straight from sainte-baume thru mistral to end right turn into signes was clocked at "215"mph!!! at that speed you really don't spend alot of time on the ground!
The front wheel only controls the lean at the start after that it's all rear wheel and power, you use that to control the bike around the corner. The MotoGP bikes can get up to 400klms but cornering on a bike is completely different to a car.
No, there are a few track in the F1 calender with very long straights, F1 one cars a lot more adgile when corning, but it's still a good showdown though
Bike kept up well in the wet...I assumed an F1 would take off quicker considering the driver can sit back and hit it, while a rider has to be careful not to power too much or else the bike will just pop up and he's walking to the finish line. I'd like to test out an F1 car
power to weight they are pretty damn close.. but with MotoGP bikes, even tho they might have the traction on the rear on the take off, if they go full out, they will just wheel stand and throw the bike down the road.. also the car has a much larger contact patch with its rear tires aswell for the power to be transfered through
k. roberts is a friend of mine. 2 yrs. ago at assen sitting in his motorhome we were talking about the engine in curtiss' bike. on the test bench in the shop in england they were pushing 270 hp!!!! but it's not tractable even with traction controll. hell last year there was a rumor that honda had a 295 hp. experiment but couldn't keep the cases together!
@ghost500e F1 car destroyed in top speed? Are you serious? The top speed in MotoGP ever recorded is 349kph, in the 2004 Italian GP, a BMW achieved 369kph. Only reason MotoGP ever comes close to F1 in any performance category is when the F1 cars have had their balls cut off by 200+hp.
@benjyboba The bike has 2 wheels, it doesn't have significant downforce. Several runs with MotoGP and F1 have shown F1 cars are quicker in a streight line
@LOOPETIM that is dead on right so in all the MotoGP would still loose i saw a Vid it showed that on dry conditions, F1 v. MotoGP w/ drag race tyres and extended wheel base, 0-80mhp moto won but after the F1 aero took effect it was gone being able to use full throttle
@hypersaiyangoku all the videos shown are the bikes on f1 tracks. homecourt advantage. The motogp tracks are designed for lower speed harder corners where the bikes would excel the f1 cars would be out of their powerband on the motogp tracks. thats why all the f1 tracks have lots more and longer straights.
the f1 has the advantage that you can accelerate it to the max and it won't lift, the GP if you give the max throttle it will stand in its back wheel and end of the race for the bike
You're all missing the point. Both vehicles give the DRIVER/RIDER the platform to display scintilating skill and are amazing spectacles. Personally I like watching the ergonomics and rawness of the bikes, you see the physical input the riders need to make to pull those beasts around and the danger adds to it. Doing what they do in the face of death day in day out takes big kahoonas. In fact riders on the tt are just one big pair of bollocks they have such big bollocks. Go back some years when the cars slid more were overpowered and handled worse, more dangerous and unregulated, then you get something almost equally fantastic to watch.
@400SA Moto GP bikes are reduced to 800 CC. They use to be 950. That's nearly 20% down. Then the power is only 220 BHP VS the F1's 950 BHP. The cost of the F1 car is a hell of a lot more to design. Better technology aswell.
F1 cars have semi-automatic double clutch transmissions that can change gears in a matter of milliseconds whereas Motogp bikes are shifted the old fashioned way.
We can easily imaginate that in dry conditions, the F1 would be faster than now, and the difference between bike and F1 would be bigger. Because in a F1 you have a lot of electronics, and prevent the F1 for skidding. I mean the start would be better without the electronic control on a dry track ! In a motogp, there isn t that electronic help, so the driver can start as he wants, if he is good, he isn't restricting by the electronic as the driver F1 is !
@hypersaiyangoku The reason that F1 moved to V8's was to cut costs and meet safety measures. The I think thatBAR ran a car at the end of 2005 that was developing about 1000BHP. In a car that weighs so little, that's a crazy amount. I'm not complaining though, tbh they should let the cars run whatever engines and crazy parts they want. If a team wants to squeeze 1200BHP out of a 3 litre 6 cylinder turbo engine, let them. Its F1, it shouldn't be restricted!
@jasonsitu Yes, but then a bike will be more efficient on the street than a F1 car. High agility, small, light and not to mention, can go over bumps. :)
This is what makes sportbikes so badass!!.. Can you go get that car, and drive it on the street?? Even if you could afford it, no.. The bike? Hell yeah!!! and for only a few thousand bucks too!!
@matman1813sdc wrong- besides from all that you need a headlight, brakelight, turn signals, one hell of a muffler, and probably more depending on your local laws. my point being it would take just as much work to turn a motogp bike street legal as it would an f1 car. cheers.
@SteveCooper1983 you guys are also forgetting all the other factors. the main one being wind direction and road conditions. a 8-10mph wind has a much larger effect on a vehicle with less down force. that wind blowing head on gives the f1 a noticeable advantage over the bike creating down force earlier for the car and extra drag for the less aerodynamic bike. from a dead stop 0 - 1200 meters bike. Everything else f1.
after sponsoring a 2 bike team during the 80's i can tell you from experience and the inside scoop the bikes that are now being raced are into 1.5 million dollars. hell rossi's fork tubes with no plumping just the tubes and sliders are $50,000.00 alone. so when you see rossi or lorrenzo throw it down on a low side in any corner there goes 1.5 million in the air. must be nice to go racing huh!!!!!
This is about what you'd expect. The bike is let down because of it's tendency to wheelie at the start line. Although, in general (in terms of road legal) bikes are quicker than cars because of their amazing acceleration. Search for "Jenson Button Vs TheSuper Bike" it has a much better race
@HardFang14 Being an F1 and racing fan..you have to keep the speed at a certain level because of safety and human life. Our reflexes can only handle so much. When the margin of error is so small when F1 cars start having so much downforce grip and power...the margin for error is so small and the impact so hard in some accident.....You have to slow them down.
@hypersaiyangoku Actually that depends on the set-up of the car, you can set an F1 car up with the same downforce as a Bike, nil, and it will easily do 260mph with ridiculous acceleration, and suck as much as a bike does for the corners. F1 car will win on most tracks by 20 seconds a lap over any motorcycle.
@400SA Don't get me wrong, I also watch F1, but I haven't followed the details, same with Moto GP. Basically Moto GP bikes could have been so much faster with the rise in technolgy in recent years and the fact that the reduction in engine size affected the whole bike completely. Weight and the balance of a bike is very important. The power has slowly gone back up to how it was with the bigger engines, but it could have been even more.
@slb785 So the car has a better chance, in the dry the bike would whip its ass. Notice the bike caught up in the latter part (when the car is supposed to have the advantage). Good vid
Probably not. If their already moving the F1 has enough down force to stick to the road like velcro... the bike on the other had will be struggling to keep the front wheel down when accelerating. I believe F1s have done 415+km/h in the Mojave deserts on a straight. I think the most a Ducati Desomondici has done is like 367km/h...
yea i know mate, an F1 will out-perform a bike, but this isnt a competition, what i said was they're both exciting in their own way, be it watching or riding/driving one of them. i dont like comparing, personally i just prefer bikes, and thats just an opinion. cheers!
@Angelus12308 you cant legally drive a gp bike on any street... so there for no you cant drive it on the road... f1 cars have adjustable suspension heights, at its highest setting its probably comparable to some of the exotic supercars
Bally46 i agree with you, but i don't feel like i lost. speed on a bike is not the same as in a F1 car. rossi and schumacher were at a track where they tried each others machine. after several laps rossi was 1.5 sec. off what would have been the race pace. schumacher who loves bikes and rides alot tried rossi's. after 20 laps he was 6 sec. off the pace!! the switch from bikes to cars is easier for riders then cars to bikes for drivers. the sense of protection is gone for the drivers.
the car has a way bigger engine and better power to weight ratio than the bike by comparison the car would probably be par with the bike on the track, and the bike would certainly win in the canyons. a drag race however is centered around HP and the biggest engine wins
@Master1906 I agree with you, its intresting to watch but you can not compare a car and a bike....two different things but yes, very cool to watch it.....
@bobbj77 no not at all. the angle of the camera made it look that way a little but all in all the bike should have had better traction in the rain since the F1 has very wide tries that cause it to hydro plain much easier than a bikes thinner tire would (this is simple physics). face it, bikes may be fast but they are not as fast as an F1 car.
@lonelykatana The bike can never show its potential on a track against the F! because it has to brake 150 yards sooner and can't aply full power out of the corners. Well the 990 could only use full power for 10% of track or even less. I've allways wondered what the top speed of a moto gp bike could be if they geared it for a top speed test and had a few miles straight. Having 260 hp and low weight plus aerodynamics, I reckon it could reach maybe 250 mph possibly. Love to see that done.
@SecularTechnology It would need a completely new design to the machine. One where a large surface area of tyre stays flat yet it could still lean. To keep a bike as it currently is, would be very difficult to get the downforce pusshing down when it leans. New design. Would be a nice challenge to build one though. It would spoil the fun of bike racing. I think bikes are best the way they are. Bikes vs Bikes, rider vs rider. Sliding wobling with skill of rider. skill.
the restrictions kind of defeat the purpose of f1. it is supposed to be the fastest, the best. its just to to know that technology progress is coming to a stop
if i gear it right i could get it to go like 400-500mph. it would be sooo cool cruising downtown, pull thru burgerking doing 350mph. everyone would say ' was that the honda guy'....wow!!!.....
@aponcapone You said a car has 4 wheels to put its power down so you were implying it was 4 wheel drive. And comparing cars to bikes is like comparing apples to oranges, its still interesting to watch.
If it wasnt a completly soaked track the bike would have won,of course te f1 car would have better traction in the rain over a bike any day but if it was dry the other way around
yup, fuji speedway, japan. and about "which one is best", u cant compare either, they're different machines, its pointless to compare them, they both offer aspects the other one doesnt. lets just enjoy racing
@planetsareoverrated it got no doors, and for the rest I don't know but I do know you can drive it without a car-drivers license but with a bike license.. Wanna bet?
Great video - I wish the was a little bit longer and it wasnt wet.
I like how the bike pulls in the f1 quite heavily after they reach roughly. This is were the torque plays a larger role compared to ultimate tracktion.
Either way they are crazy fast.
i think the Left pixel was faster than the right pixel, but not sure, cus all i saw was pixels...
Reminds me of some of the finest video games for ZX Spectrum and Commodore 64. The resolution and color quality was simply unbeatable.
Thing about it is , it wouldn't be fair. The bike would have the tendancy to wheelie , can't use full power while wheeliing for obvious reason. And the f1 car would have to hit high revs to use full power to keep from spinning out.
Great quality video, one of the best I've seen on youtube!! Thanks for posting...
what model toaster did you use to record this?
The max engine capacity was actually 990cc starting in 02, 800cc after 07, and 1000 in '12. I doubt they were using a current bike so it was most likely pre-07 meaning 990cc.
Also I was never arguing price. I just said the top classes of cars are faster than the top classes of bikes and that's the truth. Look up some actual times instead of spewing bullshit. The only record I can think of off the top of my head that a bike holds is the standing mile and we'll see how long that lasts.
this is for S1And3ron, its 'Qatar' with a 'Q' but i like that you were impressed. after 1985 the gp race of france went to lemans, before that it was at paul ricard. nowadays they rent ricard to set up bikes. the motogp class now (800s) is 333lbs. eddie lawson testing at ricard in 1986. 500cc two stroke v-4 "236"lbs went down the back straight from sainte-baume thru mistral to end right turn into signes was clocked at "215"mph!!! at that speed you really don't spend alot of time on the ground!
Nicely put, couldn't say it better :D i personally prefer motogp, doesn't mean they are better.
The front wheel only controls the lean at the start after that it's all rear wheel and power, you use that to control the bike around the corner.
The MotoGP bikes can get up to 400klms but cornering on a bike is completely different to a car.
No, there are a few track in the F1 calender with very long straights, F1 one cars a lot more adgile when corning, but it's still a good showdown though
Bike kept up well in the wet...I assumed an F1 would take off quicker considering the driver can sit back and hit it, while a rider has to be careful not to power too much or else the bike will just pop up and he's walking to the finish line.
I'd like to test out an F1 car
power to weight they are pretty damn close.. but with MotoGP bikes, even tho they might have the traction on the rear on the take off, if they go full out, they will just wheel stand and throw the bike down the road.. also the car has a much larger contact patch with its rear tires aswell for the power to be transfered through
k. roberts is a friend of mine. 2 yrs. ago at assen sitting in his motorhome we were talking about the engine in curtiss' bike. on the test bench in the shop in england they were pushing 270 hp!!!! but it's not tractable even with traction controll. hell last year there was a rumor that honda had a 295 hp. experiment but couldn't keep the cases together!
the sound is too high pitch to be a gp bike
@ghost500e F1 car destroyed in top speed? Are you serious? The top speed in MotoGP ever recorded is 349kph, in the 2004 Italian GP, a BMW achieved 369kph. Only reason MotoGP ever comes close to F1 in any performance category is when the F1 cars have had their balls cut off by 200+hp.
@benjyboba
The bike has 2 wheels, it doesn't have significant downforce. Several runs with MotoGP and F1 have shown F1 cars are quicker in a streight line
what is the resoultion here?? was this video taken on a motorola razr??
@UnseenSpirit well F1 cars have been reduced from 1400 BHP per ton to the 950 per ton so thats also a great reduce of power
@LOOPETIM that is dead on right so in all the MotoGP would still loose i saw a Vid it showed that on dry conditions, F1 v. MotoGP w/ drag race tyres and extended wheel base, 0-80mhp moto won but after the F1 aero took effect it was gone being able to use full throttle
F1 is better but MotoGP is still good fun.
@hypersaiyangoku
all the videos shown are the bikes on f1 tracks. homecourt advantage. The motogp tracks are designed for lower speed harder corners where the bikes would excel the f1 cars would be out of their powerband on the motogp tracks. thats why all the f1 tracks have lots more and longer straights.
@Tibberia F1 has an extra chicane at the end of catalunya, motogp doesn't use that chicane.
the f1 has the advantage that you can accelerate it to the max and it won't lift, the GP if you give the max throttle it will stand in its back wheel and end of the race for the bike
You're all missing the point.
Both vehicles give the DRIVER/RIDER the platform to display scintilating skill and are amazing spectacles.
Personally I like watching the ergonomics and rawness of the bikes, you see the physical input the riders need to make to pull those beasts around and the danger adds to it.
Doing what they do in the face of death day in day out takes big kahoonas. In fact riders on the tt are just one big pair of bollocks they have such big bollocks. Go back some years when the cars slid more were overpowered and handled worse, more dangerous and unregulated, then you get something almost equally fantastic to watch.
Cool ass race, the F1 car turns up just like a bike. F1 FTW!!!!!!! Bikes can be beat.
Fuji track in Japan, not Singapore.
@400SA
Moto GP bikes are reduced to 800 CC. They use to be 950. That's nearly 20% down.
Then the power is only 220 BHP VS the F1's 950 BHP.
The cost of the F1 car is a hell of a lot more to design. Better technology aswell.
i think even motoGP bikes are designed to generate downforce, but the generated downforce is not as significant as an F1 car due to area limitations
F1 cars have semi-automatic double clutch transmissions that can change gears in a matter of milliseconds whereas Motogp bikes are shifted the old fashioned way.
@benjyboba
If you put downforce on a bike. It would risk a spin out on every corner if a rider over-steered.
@xtrubblex86 murcielago does 209 had has a huge spoiler! but than it makes no where near as much down force as an f1 car.
We can easily imaginate that in dry conditions, the F1 would be faster than now, and the difference between bike and F1 would be bigger. Because in a F1 you have a lot of electronics, and prevent the F1 for skidding. I mean the start would be better without the electronic control on a dry track !
In a motogp, there isn t that electronic help, so the driver can start as he wants, if he is good, he isn't restricting by the electronic as the driver F1 is !
This isnt a race, it is a rain tire test.
@hypersaiyangoku The reason that F1 moved to V8's was to cut costs and meet safety measures. The I think thatBAR ran a car at the end of 2005 that was developing about 1000BHP. In a car that weighs so little, that's a crazy amount. I'm not complaining though, tbh they should let the cars run whatever engines and crazy parts they want. If a team wants to squeeze 1200BHP out of a 3 litre 6 cylinder turbo engine, let them. Its F1, it shouldn't be restricted!
@jasonsitu Yes, but then a bike will be more efficient on the street than a F1 car. High agility, small, light and not to mention, can go over bumps. :)
This is what makes sportbikes so badass!!.. Can you go get that car, and drive it on the street?? Even if you could afford it, no.. The bike? Hell yeah!!! and for only a few thousand bucks too!!
@matman1813sdc wrong- besides from all that you need a headlight, brakelight, turn signals, one hell of a muffler, and probably more depending on your local laws. my point being it would take just as much work to turn a motogp bike street legal as it would an f1 car. cheers.
@SteveCooper1983
you guys are also forgetting all the other factors. the main one being wind direction and road conditions. a 8-10mph wind has a much larger effect on a vehicle with less down force. that wind blowing head on gives the f1 a noticeable advantage over the bike creating down force earlier for the car and extra drag for the less aerodynamic bike. from a dead stop 0 - 1200 meters bike. Everything else f1.
Actually the Bugatti does, that car was built for outright speed, and that as a V12, for a F1 car to reach that speed it will need a V12
after sponsoring a 2 bike team during the 80's i can tell you from experience and the inside scoop the bikes that are now being raced are into 1.5 million dollars. hell rossi's fork tubes with no plumping just the tubes and sliders are $50,000.00 alone. so when you see rossi or lorrenzo throw it down on a low side in any corner there goes 1.5 million in the air. must be nice to go racing huh!!!!!
The Bike is faster in a straightline, but once the corners come the bike is way out matched
i just want to know which pixel is the car
Is there some rule that these drag races must occur in the rain?
This is about what you'd expect.
The bike is let down because of it's tendency to wheelie at the start line.
Although, in general (in terms of road legal) bikes are quicker than cars because of their amazing acceleration.
Search for "Jenson Button Vs TheSuper Bike" it has a much better race
@HardFang14 Being an F1 and racing fan..you have to keep the speed at a certain level because of safety and human life. Our reflexes can only handle so much. When the margin of error is so small when F1 cars start having so much downforce grip and power...the margin for error is so small and the impact so hard in some accident.....You have to slow them down.
Not Singapore for sure. We do not have a race track.
have you heard of power to weight ratios?
thankyou mr. brainsurgeon!!!!!
@thehistorywatcher
rear wheel drive not four wheel drive, but yea
an amazing video, all one pixel of it
put wheelie bar on bike and that would help, but F1 does kick major ass though.
Actually, it was a Xerox Ducati from WSBK
@newcomer9747 Because they choose not to? we have two longish right handers instead of one.
@hypersaiyangoku Actually that depends on the set-up of the car, you can set an F1 car up with the same downforce as a Bike, nil, and it will easily do 260mph with ridiculous acceleration, and suck as much as a bike does for the corners. F1 car will win on most tracks by 20 seconds a lap over any motorcycle.
they both have enough power to make any average person shit explosively. the pros just shit a little bit when they ride.
@aponcapone Haha since when did f1 cars have 4 wheel drive?
@400SA Don't get me wrong, I also watch F1, but I haven't followed the details, same with Moto GP.
Basically Moto GP bikes could have been so much faster with the rise in technolgy in recent years and the fact that the reduction in engine size affected the whole bike completely. Weight and the balance of a bike is very important. The power has slowly gone back up to how it was with the bigger engines, but it could have been even more.
@slb785 So the car has a better chance, in the dry the bike would whip its ass. Notice the bike caught up in the latter part (when the car is supposed to have the advantage). Good vid
there is nothing in this world that can defeat F1 on a race track...
@SuperGreenough acually 4 wheels doesn't mean its a car. Look at the KTM X-bow, its a bike on 4 wheels.
Wow it was closer then i expected it to be.
Probably not. If their already moving the F1 has enough down force to stick to the road like velcro... the bike on the other had will be struggling to keep the front wheel down when accelerating.
I believe F1s have done 415+km/h in the Mojave deserts on a straight. I think the most a Ducati Desomondici has done is like 367km/h...
Looks like the track is Fuji Speedway in Japan
yea i know mate, an F1 will out-perform a bike, but this isnt a competition, what i said was they're both exciting in their own way, be it watching or riding/driving one of them.
i dont like comparing, personally i just prefer bikes, and thats just an opinion. cheers!
@Angelus12308 you cant legally drive a gp bike on any street... so there for no you cant drive it on the road...
f1 cars have adjustable suspension heights, at its highest setting its probably comparable to some of the exotic supercars
lol i dindnt even see the bike :O
Bally46 i agree with you, but i don't feel like i lost. speed on a bike is not the same as in a F1 car. rossi and schumacher were at a track where they tried each others machine. after several laps rossi was 1.5 sec. off what would have been the race pace. schumacher who loves bikes and rides alot tried rossi's. after 20 laps he was 6 sec. off the pace!! the switch from bikes to cars is easier for riders then cars to bikes for drivers. the sense of protection is gone for the drivers.
acceleration its something to compare... but brakes and turns... F1 ftw
@xXwarstuserXx You can drive an Ariel Atom V8 on the street, though.
the car has a way bigger engine and better power to weight ratio than the bike by comparison
the car would probably be par with the bike on the track, and the bike would certainly win in the canyons. a drag race however is centered around HP and the biggest engine wins
@Master1906 I agree with you, its intresting to watch but you can not compare a car and a bike....two different things but yes, very cool to watch it.....
@bobbj77
no not at all. the angle of the camera made it look that way a little but all in all the bike should have had better traction in the rain since the F1 has very wide tries that cause it to hydro plain much easier than a bikes thinner tire would (this is simple physics). face it, bikes may be fast but they are not as fast as an F1 car.
@bliglum um dude, these are special bikes, not the ones you see everyday, they race them professionally, its called motogp
@crumbmc No Im saying that is a motorcycle, if you havn't hear about it then check it out.
Proving that on the top end of things bikes ARE not as fast as cars and NEVER will be. a F1 will destroy ANY bike in ANY type of race period.
no way man, it was recorded with a Granny Smith apple
@lonelykatana The bike can never show its potential on a track against the F! because it has to brake 150 yards sooner and can't aply full power out of the corners. Well the 990 could only use full power for 10% of track or even less. I've allways wondered what the top speed of a moto gp bike could be if they geared it for a top speed test and had a few miles straight. Having 260 hp and low weight plus aerodynamics, I reckon it could reach maybe 250 mph possibly. Love to see that done.
i love the part where its in hd :)
actullay the track is called motegi and it wasnt dani pedrosa
240p we meet again...
this is not in singapore... , It's Fuji Speedway in Japan
its not singapore.... its fuji international in japan.
its at Fuji Speedway, Japan
this place isn't Singapore for sure... the commentator is speaking japanese, so perhaps in Japan?
@SecularTechnology It would need a completely new design to the machine. One where a large surface area of tyre stays flat yet it could still lean. To keep a bike as it currently is, would be very difficult to get the downforce pusshing down when it leans. New design. Would be a nice challenge to build one though. It would spoil the fun of bike racing. I think bikes are best the way they are. Bikes vs Bikes, rider vs rider. Sliding wobling with skill of rider. skill.
who won? it looked like the moto gp bike was catching up
the restrictions kind of defeat the purpose of f1. it is supposed to be the fastest, the best. its just to to know that technology progress is coming to a stop
if i gear it right i could get it to go like 400-500mph. it would be sooo cool cruising downtown, pull thru burgerking doing 350mph. everyone would say ' was that the honda guy'....wow!!!.....
Standing starts are not a bikes forte either genius, power all going to one wheel and trying to keep the front from flipping.
You CAN buy an F1 car or Moto GP bike.
All you need is money... a lot of money.
Whatta heck are you talking about? Moto GP class has 800 cc bikes.
Where did you get this camera....the...toilet store?
@aponcapone You said a car has 4 wheels to put its power down so you were implying it was 4 wheel drive. And comparing cars to bikes is like comparing apples to oranges, its still interesting to watch.
If it wasnt a completly soaked track the bike would have won,of course te f1 car would have better traction in the rain over a bike any day but if it was dry the other way around
yup, fuji speedway, japan.
and about "which one is best", u cant compare either, they're different machines, its pointless to compare them, they both offer aspects the other one doesnt. lets just enjoy racing
@jester34545 which is why he recorded it with a soda bottle with a fork in it
is that a 2 or 4 cylinder engine?!?!?!!!
@xXwarstuserXx Sure you can lol. Put headlamps tail lights and turn signals then it's legal they can't stop you :D
@planetsareoverrated it got no doors, and for the rest I don't know but I do know you can drive it without a car-drivers license but with a bike license.. Wanna bet?