Mi6 Audit. Police Abuse Member of The Publics Rights!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ธ.ค. 2022
- Hi guys
I visited Mi6 and after a short time I was approached by the Police.
I was subsequently unlawfully detained and searched under section 43 of the terrorism act. The officer used this to view my footage before telling me he was seizing my device.
The officer would not confirm if he had read the Mets guidance on public photography which clearly states that filming in public is NOT grounds to use stop and search powers.
The officer decided to coerce me into deleting the footage but again he was all brawn and no brains and the footage was perfectly fine as you can see.
There was the same old issue with the non police issue gang badge on display and the other officer failing to follow BWV policy. Considering they are willing to abuse terrorism legislation then its no surprise that they are willing to abuse other policies.
There will be a formal complaint against the officers involved and there will be civil proceedings to follow.
The police clearly are still happy to abuse the terrorism act to criminalise public photography and as long as this continues auditors will be on hand to show this form of corruption for what it is.
PHOTOGRAPHY IS NOT A CRIME
Thanks for watching
Take care
TLA
As a retired police sergeant I can safely say I have never heard such paranoid bullshit in my life. The male constable should be a magician as has clearly mastered the art of talking out of his arse. He must have spent ages practicing his little script.
Yeah yeah 😂 back in the Juliet Bravo days more like
“You’re entitled to make a complaint”
bloody oath he is.
@@cabletie69 shocking - we need to shake up the boat, too many coppers think it’s safe in these waters, it’s not sharks are closing in on this facade of a police force…
"My grounds are that I have reason to believe" but he never said what those reasons were, so he never told you the grounds. He was just trying to justify his nonsense. It's amazing how much corruption and incompetence has been revealed since manufacturers stuck cameras in our phones.
Spot on. I was about to comment and say exactly that. You saved me the trouble. The cop had grounds in his imagination but they cannot be reasonable in that they led to the photographer being associated with terrorism.
‘I don’t need to read the guidance, I have the power to..’ this says everything you need to know about the, arrogant, ignorant, narcissistic idiots we have armed and given free reign over the citizens. 🤦♂️
dont they realise this building is literally a tourist attraction because its in every fucking james bond movie ! ?
Yea I’ve said this before. If anything secretive is going on in there they would be stupid. This is a front/distraction from where the actual mi6 is?
Let them keep using section 43. It will go the same way section 44 did. If they genuinely believe you are a terrorist then per policy/procedure they are supposed to call in the anti terrorism unit.
You have faith in the satanic politicians to do the right thing?
True but their ignorance for abusing their powers solely for public control against the rights of the people will water down their powers so much that they won't be able to actually stop real threats.
absolute shocking behavior by the met police total abuse of powers need to name shame this person !!
So he says he thinks you're a terrorist so he searches you,,, then goes on to say, if we have to come back we'll search you again,,,, its obvious the search is his lame way of dolling out punishment,, and his suspicion is just ego driven bollocks,,,
You missed out on asking him the most important question "do you suspect that I am a terrorist?", any answer other than yes would make the search unlawful. He can only search you if he suspects you are a terrorist not search you first to help him make that determination.
doesn't matter what you ask them they will never give you a straight answer, like politicians there is never a yes or no
@@awhisperinthewind4253 you are right they won't but, that would help in a claim against them.
Oh no, I never knew that building (that has been in many James Bond movies) was so secret....being MI6 and all that.
One of the most photographed buildings after parliament.
Should have told him if he goes down the section 43 route that when the search is over you are going to film everything including personal plates
I agree, perfect come back at the end that shows you can, legally, film whatever you want?
The most disturbing element of this whole video was @ 13:30, when the female cop laughed at the fact she was exposed as a traitor by supporting the desecration of the flag for her own agenda, only to then walk off and abandon her colleague under the threat of terrorism, pfft.
Thin blue line thug abusing his so called powers these police gang members need to be held accountable.
That officer is power tripping and hasn't got a clue what he's on about.
They need to learn hostile reconnaissance!!
Question, if this and Mi5 buildings are "so sensitive" then WHY the h3ll did they put them in the middle of london??
Its easier for auditors to find them.
@@aireboat7988 yep there is that, Can't have supposedly top secret organisations in secret places can they? 🤣🤣
It’s difficult for them to identify , because they have been asked by a lesser human than them , a pauper so to speak , and they feel their loosing power . Shower of absolute criminals .shocking !,,,,
This is totally corrupt. At approx 11:30 the cop clearly says "if I believe". Does this "belief" constitute that legal thresholds have been reached? Where's the current and credible evidence that this photographer constitutes a threat to this building? As for keeping your hands tucked into a stab vest when "confronting" a potential terrorist??? You can't make this stuff up.
Some of them just don't get it! "You can't trespass my eyes!" Is a good response when they say it's intrusive! Great job staying calm!
PLEASE USE THIS - It's the feet that trespass, not the eyes
Im sick of hearing "its a protected sight" if its that protected there is nothing to worry about and if not then build a brick wall so nobody can see it.
*site.
Usual unreasonable grounds , asking for ID under section 43 and no idea about the guidelines.You got it, HNK.
If this cop was doing his job properly instead of harassing members of the public their wouldn't be any weak points.
Cops been watching too many America cop shows.
BLACK GUY THINKS HES IN MINORITY REPORT STOP CRIME BEFORE HAPPENS PREDITCTRION
They don’t give a toss m8
Drop the "sir" honorific, it shows respect to them that they don't deserve. Count the ratio of sirs TO them,and FROM them, see the difference?? 🤔
Laurel and Hardy got more brains than those two officers....she said nothing and that empowered his misconduct and illegal detainment and search.
Silly policewoman saying its a protected site, Barn Owls are protected, so does mean were not allowed to film those 🙄😁
Sue them because they won't learn unfortunately until section 43 is gone.
Would be interested to know how the civil clam went?
If you don't take legal action against these officers you are wasting every person's time
@@wellerjam Thanks for your valuable reply
@@DavidMiller-pt5su Is that you think of people who highlight the wrong doing of some police?
Google maps have some excellent quality images of the MI6 building.
Including nice close ups of all the cameras etc etc.
The incompetence of the , so called, police is frightening.
No wonder there's so many auditors.The reason being is folk being detained and searched up and down the country for filming in public . It really gets under my skin the way the police abuse their egotistical powers. Well handled buddy.You will inspire more people to hold these fools accountable for their actions..RESPECT..
He's talking waffle making it up as ge goes along.. hope you sue this clown bro
I certainly will bro, I will update in due course
@@thelaughingauditor good, hope you get lots of £££😊
you need to save onto the cloud at the same time.
What makes him judge and jury to watch and decide on content of film.
You MUST file lawsuit
She laughed when you told her a lot of people are offended by the desecration of our countries flag. Disgusting.
just repeating the same sentence over and over does not make it lawful ! reasonable grounds are not just in his tiny brain
Grounds need to be based on OBJECTIVE FACTS not SUBJECTIVE OPINION
The only crime here is this offers abuse of his perceived powers
He’s full of s**t
Abuse of power, needs to be taken to court
Just a tip. Refuse to engage with them until they verbally state their ID details. Very few auditors do that.
The male cop is scarily misinformed. Voyueurism 🤣🤣🤣🤣
These PCs are a joke both of them need to learn the law and their policy. Filming intrusively is not a crime typical bully tactics. The contempt they have for the public is palpable.
Auditors should show this to a jury dont except any pig bribe. Take the sods to court. Its the only way.
If this building is so secret why did the authorities allow it to be filmed in the James Bond movie Golden Eye ???????
Forward this video to Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley head of the Metropolitan police and ask for his comments on the behaviour of his officers.
Then make an example of this officer and sack him.
Lol, you think they'll do that?
@@bionic4368 read Rowleys comments on getting rid of thousands of rogue incompetent officers in the MET.
@@Pennywise180 no.
I know what happens.
We need to unite against these thugs(cops)!!
One of the worst jabber jabber yet! Her flag was totally disgraceful and all she could about it was grin. Don't let the civil action go. You MUST report it.
Yes. It has become the _duty_ of all auditors with video evidence of abuse to push complaints and legal action as far as it will go.
@@1977ajax Yes, take note and do it!
They need to move the M16 building to an isolated island in Scotland , also stop every coach that passes by full of tourists who are potential terrorists .
Both plod are clueless and not bothered how much money this will cost the public purse .Piss Poor Policing by the Met again .
Keep the fools away from Scotland please
glad someone else has mentioned the sightseeing busses
Just by their stupid questioning,, It’s actually making them look WEAK ,
He seriously needs some retraining
andy - He also needs his bum kicked till his nose bleeds!
He was a waffling liar who didn't know much about The Human Rights Act nor anything about the NPCC Memo to all forces regarding auditors!.....PINAC big boy!
Just tell them you are there to catch corrupt officers who love to abuse the terrorist act.
Why is it so difficult for these constables to correctly identify themselves, name, shoulder number and police station they are attached too, its not difficult!!!
Come on, this is the Met remember!
what is the worst about this section 43 abuse is that in section 43 it say's you cannot use public photography as the reason . you must have other proof fist and the photos on camera must backup the other proof. they knowthis but still keep breaking the law proviving they are the crimminals always.
Watch audit britian
"you are filming an important building" aresst everyone filming buckingham palace. lol
So you are using your personal phone for auditing? Thats incredibly dumb. Use a burner phone to conduct audits, its what everyone else does, protect your identity at all costs pal
Sue Him Personally, look at AB respect 🙏,, Cop abused section 43 of the Terrorism Act, did he write out a Detainment form. He was out of order,
Their ignorance is bliss to them and they know there’s no accountability
That cop just..doesn't...get it.. What a slow, sad p.o.s. The end justifies the means is what that cop lives by. I hope you hold him accountable.
LEGALS
“”My grounds are …I have a belief you might”
Need I say more? Them ain’t grounds in Law.
PS. And he didn’t state what he expected to find, or state his name, or his station…
Thus all his behaviour was professional but … 100% illegal.
I have the powers is he man. Give them a badge and they think they can what they want and her with that defaced flag on tells you she is a tyrant
It drives me mad when officers put their hands in their stab vest arm holes! 😡
Please say your taking action against him! 👍
Yeah, he's holding a grudge.
He wont🧐
I used to work next door to this building. I often saw the police pounce on tourists who took photos of this building, cease their cameras and delete their photos. Some of these tourists were just taking photos from the north of the river. The same year, I visited the UN building in New York, their security didn't mind me taking photos outside.
I do hope you put in a complaint against this insecure bully...
This Guy is guarding our sécurity? We are in trouble
And then he goes on to prove he’s an even bigger idiot than we all thought when he says “ If they call us again I’ll come and do it all again.”
So there must have been some new piece of evidence come to light as he already knows you have no terrorist type items upon your person
ASK ffs.....not AKS smh. Sue the crap out of them.
15.35 an old Routemaster 😊
Unless you privately prosecute them it's pointless mate...he has no grounds whatsoever...only what he's made up in his head...
That's what happens when you lower the standards of joining the police force.
There should be a way to sue the individual officer, as I don't think they will be so quick to act unlawfully. They do'n't care if you put a claim in as it doesn't hit them directly.
Well Done TLA, Whenever you guys get unlawfully detained compensation should be taken out of the Detaining officers salary.
“What are you filming it for”
A - “it was in a movie”
Scotty you're not that dumb surely. I know right why your comment falls apart or do I need to explain it
@@YellowMouse998 crack on explain
Only caught the last part of the video...what the hell are you doing auditing with a personal phone?
That is stupid town terrority. Just use a very cheap hand held camera with a clean storage disk. If they want to seize it tell them go for it. You will only get another and do the same. It all adds to your civil claim.
100% correct, it is not rocket science.
Its a shame they didn’t show more of an interest with the Manchester Bomber carrying a rucksack full of explosives!Maybe if the bomber had a camera then he would have been caught and searched. Then the innocent members of the public caught up in the bombing wouldn’t have been blown to bits.
Hostile reconnaissance is covert, not overt. Uneducated cops. Nothing new there.
@@tonyb1223 it was a court.
@@tonyb1223 but that's being covert. Photographing in public in plain view, isn't covert. Didn't you read the police's own wording on it? I provided a link. They should know their own guidance. Clearly they don't.
This cop's brain works in slow-motion.
see you next Tuesday Cops. Menopause is no excuse
Dude do yourself a favour and get a body camera and STOP using a phone get a propper camera like what @DJ Audits uses. Also police CAN NOT make you delete anything only a court order can do that and faking deleting the video to the police just makes them think they got there way also NEVER turn off the camera while getting searched
🎯👍👏👏🙋♀️🇬🇧
@@Tom-ol6cu generic go pro style cameras are cheap and the recording quality is pretty good
Disgrace how do ignorant people with no understanding of the law or civil rights manage to become police officers I suspect that a role as a school crossing officer would be a challenge for him. It’s officers like him that do irreparable damage to trust in our police force he should never be allowed to come in contact with the public again
QUICK GET ALL COPS HERE HE HAS ACAMERA
That's the *MAIN PROBLEM* -"Just make a complaint" (as we know jack sh*t will happen, we do this sh*t all the time and nothing happens)
Some auditors have made complaints and got compensation as a result. So, yes, sometimes there is a positive outcome to the complaints process. If a payout resulted then that PC will also have a negative mark in his/her file. If we, the public, don't attempt change, then nothing is guaranteed to change!
@@BritishBelle. it will always be an uphill battle but one that has to be waged
Lots of these videos are now been checked by the serious misconduct squad. Which is to root out bad policing.
Thugs with badges!!!
We would really like to know how you get on with your claim against that tyrant
The trouble is, they never learn. Did not listen AT ALL. They just won't hear anything that contradicts themselves. They smirk and mock and betray their oath every step of the way - its absolutely shocking behaviour. They do this to tourists you know, who unsuspectingly give over their names and delete the footage and feel humiliated, alarmed and distressed.
The thing is, WE the Audience need to start supporting our Auditors and go out there and have a go at recording for ourselves. Absolutely nobody ever has to see it (personal use) but until we back them up, they all say 'oh you're one of Them!'.
They are doing this for us - please go out in your local areas. These wonderful Auditors have taught us so much, to arm us against such bullying. You can always walk away if they get too aggressive for you and then inform an Auditor of your experience. 🥸 Come on people 🦾
Misuse of section 43, he had no grounds, also he cannot look at your phone without a court warrant, illegal detainment and illegal search, make sure you sue the pair of them, because the female officer is as guilty as the male officer.
@@kevinwest942 it's about our rights dude. Sorry if you're a sheeple. Smh.
@@kevinwest942 It is his channel he can do what he wants. He is not breaking the law and if any officer is negligent in any way he is entitled to seek compensation.
He does NOT need a warrant to VIEW the phone.
He’s entitled to search anything under s43.
The met have been busy franticly texting aroound concerns about the number of civil actions being lost for unlawful arrests with abuses of section 43 .akmost all have been overturned in court
Last time I was arrested, I turned my phone off before giving it to the sargent but when I got it back it was on. When I asked what they had been unlawfully trying to search my private device for they claimed nobody had touched it. Always keep your phone locked. These black shirts don't care about the law, all they care about is their "power".
Someone tell that female copper to take her hands out of her vest. You can't defend yourself love if the POI suddenly gpes hands on. Apart from that it looks slovenly..
Good content once again
It's probably an unconscious defensive posture. She has been groped once too often by her colleagues.
That is a copper in full mode power trip
Sue them !
Where was the search record, did not comply with law failed to ID and give police station and grounds for search. Not made up hypothesis.
Ego takes over, pointing to your shoulder does not constitute as a police officer identifying themselves prior to a S43 search.
I don't need to explain as I have th power - there is modern policing in a nutshell.
That black copper was so corrupt
all are non of them have a clue
Sueing is the only way to feel vindicated, these clowns will never ever learn, just keep on sueing, surely someone in the service with more than one brain cell will start to realise eventually