Sony Xperia 1 iii vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Detailed Camera Comparison
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ต.ค. 2024
- Camera Comparison Videos
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra vs ZTE Axon 30 Ultra: bit.ly/Axon30Uv...
Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra: bit.ly/Mi11Ultr...
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra vs Vivo X60 Pro+: bit.ly/Mi11UvsX...
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra vs iPhone 12 Pro Max: bit.ly/Mi11Uvs1...
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra vs Samsung S21 Ultra: bit.ly/Mi11UvsS21U
Unboxing
Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro: bit.ly/Mi11Pro...
Speed Tests
Redmi K30 Ultra vs Realme X7 Pro: bit.ly/K30UvsX7P
Honest Reviews
Realme X50 Pro Player Review: bit.ly/X50ProP...
Subscribe to this Channel: bit.ly/PleaseSU...
Most Popular Video of this Channel: bit.ly/Popularb...
Smartphone Camera Comparisons: bit.ly/MoronSty...
Living in China Vlogs: bit.ly/Livingin...
xiaomi mi 11 ultra vs Sony Xperia 1 iii camera comparison, Sony Xperia 1 iii vs xiaomi mi 11 ultra camera test, Sony Xperia 1 iii vs xiaomi mi 11 ultra camera comparison, xiaomi mi 11 ultra vs Sony Xperia 1 iii camera, Sony Xperia 1 iii vs xiaomi mi 11 ultra camera review, Sony Xperia 1 iii Camera Review, Sony Xperia 1 iii camera test, Sony Xperia 1 iii vs xiaomi mi 11 ultra Detailed Camera Comparison, xiaomi mi 11 ultra vs Sony Xperia 1 iii Honest Camera Comparison, sony xperia 1 iii, - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra: bit.ly/Mi11UltraVsMi11Pro
Please don't forget to make a comment with your thoughts and ideas. Please Like, Share & Subscribe
Subscribe and make a valid comment to win a Giveaway!
waiting from 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩
Sure.
My english is horrible english that's why I'm not commenting all the video.
@@tunchap you can write in your language
Waiting for next 75 min
Waiting for premiere
Sony keeps quality not only in the camera, but also other components
. I am still using 6 years old z3 . Never replaced even battery. Still Runs a day. But most people like photos with make- up at free of cost...pink face, blue sky, etc. Sony is realistic. Recommended for smart users. Quality does matter.,😻
Xperia night me be a good choices for professional photographers, but not a choice for general users in my pov software is not well tuned for auto mode. But in pro mode it was a beast no doubts on that, overall decent.
I wonder which professional uses a phone as their professional tool. Event photographers? Fashion photographers? Landscape photographers? Real-estate photographers? People talk of pro features on a phone like professionals use them but fail to understand that the pro mode on the Xperia iii is not so different from the pro mode in any flagship available today. Just because it has a 'pro' mode doesn't make it a 'professional' tool.
But having a similar layout to sony alpha cameras is bonus for photographers
@@josephnevin Technically not necessarily professional photographers (although I'd say pros would love a phone they could use as substitute for their pro- cameras) but rather real photography enthusiasts. Those people who want to dabble into the manual controls of their smartphone cameras.
@@josephnevin not professional but sometimes it gets you out of trouble when your DSLR runs out of juice.
@@josephnevin focus lock, brust shooting, raw shooting, white balance lock, these features are not included on other pro modes of other smartphones, also exposure and iso settings are far better and functional on xperia, autofocus is better than most smartphones( vivo x60 pro plus has awsome autofocus capabilities too)
For a Long period... I prefer The Sony all the time. 🇯🇵 Japanese quality....
They are actually made in Thailand 😅
@@promiseye4974 👏👏👏👌🤣
In my opinion Xperia performed better in night 4k Videos with lot of details, good exposure, low noise and accurate shadows
Barely better and Mi11have 4k 60f sony dont.
Obviously xperia will do better in low light conditions because it's pixel size is bigger; 1.80 um compared to mi 11's 1.40 um, tho computational photography exists.
No one use only night
Barely
@@Steger13 1 Mk3 yes have 4K 60FPS but in CinemaPro, even my 5 mk2 has dat option.
I really love Sony Xperia models because of its pro manual mode and colour tone(if Sony could adjust dynamic range better then they will be insane )
after watching i'm glad i own the xiaomi.
however i really like sony's attitude and i hope their next flagship will be killer. i really want to like sony more :)
they don't give a crap about the competition in being the most popular teenager fashion toy.
no megapixel chase or non-sense.
wish they made a large size small megapixel sensor and a super fast lens. i know they can do it and make it crazy. their actual camera game is on another level.
also, that 4k display!
I legit thought for a moment this was one of those fake photo comparisons but thankfully I was wrong. very informative video. But I prefer the sony xperia 1 mark 3 due to the more real to life image processing compared to the mi 11 ultra
This channel very underrated, we need to support this channel
I wish you guys subscribe to this channel and support this channel
I thought the same bro..but he's really real.. Lol
I give props to Sony. The day time photos in Sony is very pleasing and true to life. What's even better is the sharpness to my eyes are very DSLR like and not over or under sharpened, which is rare in smartphone. Details can even match with Xiaomi even if not too detailed. But standard image with no cropping looks surprisingly equal. Well balanced. At night it's even on par with Mi 11 Ultra, minus some highlight clippings and less detailed images. What I like about Sony is what I am looking for in a smartphone, true to life and not oversaturated. That is to me is definitely a win. If I'd choose a smartphone, Sony is my go to since the overall package in not just camera but audio, screen and size is complete. I'd choose Xiaomi for the fun of course. It's mode is exceptional. But Sony finally outdid themselves this year. The Xperia 1 iii is definitely worth the buy now.
Same 3.5 mm audio jack is a must on any smartphone ❤️
yes I am the same as you, the results of the xperia 1 III photo are very real. Mi 11 ultra is really bad..
The Sony Fanboys are back in Town!
@@lukemothug ngapa lu
@@lukemothug 100% right. at the begining, i thought that my eyes got problem, cause for me, Mi11's img are more natural and good. off course, Xperia 1iii's manual mode is extremely good. and i choose Xperia 1iii, hmmm, just because its design.
The Mi 11 Ultra already has a team ready to auto process the photos in one click but the Sony expects self service. It's more focussed on manual mode and targeted at Pro photographers.
True if you're talking about color and white balance etc.. But by far Xiaomi provides much sharper and detailed images..
Besides Xiaomi has manual mode too, maybe not as professional oriented as the Sony, but it is there.
I'm a hardcore sony fan and a photographer but I'd pick the xiaomi when I'll have to choose one for my photography
very funny
Funny comment
Am a hobby photographer, just want to capture the shot as is and not the processed. I mean for example if I try to capture a pink flower in my OP and it will turn out red. Sure the colors pop and have higher dynamic range but that's not what I want.
The Selfie camera in Xperia blows out highlights.
The selfie cam is not great to begin with, but idk why they bump the exposure up so much. Maybe they want to light up faces but it’s still too much
I'll go with mi11U.. tbh
it did better every time
in day time also in night time
even it has very good results for video
so imo mi11U is a good choice :)
Sony "fan" here, since i mostly owned their smartphones.
And I know how bad the camera is overall. But this time around is a lot better than before, since i liked that over the mi in some photos :)
That's the thing. Sony fans are not crazy fanatic: all of them know of the shortcomings. They only want it to do well
For all the bells and whistles of the Mi 11, I'd actually expect more from the phone. I wouldn't say it was "waayy" better at all. It is better but none of the cropped or zoomed shots I would use anyway. I'd always prefer as close to optical Tele as possible as I think both were bad when it came to digital zoom.
In portrait mode the Mi11 is a clear winner with SONY lagging clearly behind. They need to invest more in their HDR r&d. Apart from that, I'd actually consider the 1iii the better device overall.
It's more slender, has a no hole display, has a jack (something I use a lot of) and a clean design which is a top priority for me.
Overall, the Mi11 has better basic camera systems but only marginally. I do wish you went into Photo Pro mode because the manual experience I'm sure would flip everything on its head, especially in video where the 1iii records 4k@120p in HDR.
I think there was a lot left to test. There's a significant amount that hasn't been tested but is core to the 1iii. The people that would buy the 1iii are people who care a lot about the manual experience.
You should cover the manual experience next between the two
The Sony wasn't using digital zoom in this test. The Xiaomi also has manual controls in pro mode
You are one of the early smartphone camera comparison guy in tech world. Thank you for doing this. Loved it
Sony 🤯 oow ... very good .. even with sound ... I'm shocked, Sony was never famous for zoom, in general, the phone bypassed Xiaomi ... and Porter and color rendition ... and in general ... I knew that Sony was early or later will show you how to take photos "in general, of course, there is room to strive for .. highlights, and old sores .. but in general it is not bad
I have started watching ur videos since the mi 11 ultra been out and ready to be compared, i'm cool tho with ur video comparisons cause these videos look extremly fair and there is no doubt on them at all, and yes keep going like this i'm sure u will encrease ur subscribers and views just by doing fair and nice and clean 4K videos. Good job!
it seems like that you are a Fan of this channel brother 😇
Bro we have a HansTechTalk FansBase on Facebook, if you like this channel plz Join the FbGroup:- ''HansTechTalk Fans United'' hope you will join its for all the fans of the channel
Used a Mi 11 Ultra Global here. While it is still very good in image and video quality, I sold it and got myself a refurbished S10e Snapdragon because there are few things bothered me:
1) This phone has the Snapdragon 888 and it heats up really crazy and fast. MIUI doesn't help either. S10e with the OneUI 3.0 had zero heating issues at all. 855 is one of the best chip in thermal. The only time i had s10e warm (a little warm) is during the setup and that is with android update AND app downloading at the same time in a fiberoptic WIFI environment.
2) When taking close shots, 90% of the time it is blurred. This is fatal for me as i love to take photos of my various watches. I had to resort to MACRO or ultra wide mode to get a close shot. S10e might lacking in details and camera tech, but it does the macro shot or close up shots really good (like 100% clear with details). Normal shots? Definitely mi 11 ultra wins. But it blurs even when i taking normal range food photos and plain unusable in close shots due to large sensors means it is really bad for me.
3) It is really huge and heavy. I love the premium ceramic feel, the charge speed, huge display but it is too chunky. My hands and fingers actually felt sore after longer period of use. 250-280gram with a case is simply too much. S10e on the other hands, weights only 150gram and the size is very good in one handed use. This is when i realise, i might be a compact phone user.
4) While the display is great, it consumes lots of battery in WQHD and 120hz. Too consuming. My SOT is practically 5-6 hours only. S10e Snapdragon gave me almost 7-9 hours SOT (7 being outdoor with LTE, 9 hours being 100% indoor with WIFI) with just 3100 battery. MIUI might be the culprit as well.
5) Curved display indeed feels good, looks good, but it is very bad in handling impacts or even installing a screen protector film. Tempered glass is impossible at all. Not to mention all case doesn't cover the side curves at all. S10e display is flat and yep, cheap tempered glass can be installed. Already had a dent on my mi 11 ultra display at the corner only about a month of use.
6) The fact it lacks headphone jack and SD card support is also annoying as well, i knew when i getting this, but when it comes to real life usage, i really miss those basic features.
Things i love? Display is awesome, sound is excellent, charge speed is insanely fast (10-100% in just 35 min = 67w), and ceramic case back.
In short, the major deal breakers for me are the bad close range image quality, super heavy weight and size, curved display and finally, MIUI. My bad, but now i realize my needs. Lesson learnt.
This phone mostly for people who need a best camera. About minimal distance for photo - yes, it's longer than other smartphones due big sensor. But you can increase the distance a little and then crop the photo - the quality will be better than S10. Also you can switch off 120Hz - it gives about 1 extra hour (by the way - the camera app always use 60Hz). SD card and 3.5 jack - it's our past unfortunately. It's hard to find a good smartphone with these features and in 1-2 years it will be impossible at all. So It's better to prepare for it )) ps: there are tempered glasses for this phone. I also hate curved screens modern trend but when I started use It - It wasn't very annoying.
Sounds like the Xperia 1 III is perfect for you.
I think Xperia will produce the accurate photo & result...the professionals would love that & its highly customizable, so it wont be for regular users, also it won't satisfy them..
bt. for the general people (also including me) would love the mi 11 ultras photo..coz it will produce lucrative phots & easy to use
lets see what happens 👊
Yes,their pro mode is awesome
@@chandrarajtr3674 yaa obviously bt it will be hard to master for the general folks, photogrphy isn’t that easy if someine wanna take pro photos they need to know about Exact aperture,iso,shutter speed light condition etc...
@@sakifshadman4204 yes
Bad camera from mi 11
well i'd choose Sony for the aspect of the only smartphone on the market that still innovates and doesn't take away features and offers clean ui and very natural and DSLR like pictures plus tons of control in the camera with their Alpha software. I'd choose Xioami if i wanted some of that chinese bloatware and spyware and over the top form over function design.
Lol. what an uniformed answer.
Everyone must know that:
1. Xperia camera have smaller sensors than Xiaomi's and still better dynamic range and more natural colors, not its crap taste believing its more natural when Xiaomi it's over processed everywhere (look to its overprocessed tr@sh face!)... Xperia is for pro's not for auto's n00bs!
2. Xperia will have camera software improving like every time it did (who is an truly an Xperia fan knows that!).
3. Xperia wins in battery, screen software, system settings and much better connectivity compared to crap Xiaomi for a lower price tag!
Is better on what bokeh's for pmpz or what?! These tests are not for pro's nor made by pro's! To anyone believing this crap: Be aware!!
Anyway, another great piece of work Han's bhai....
you certainly know how to get the best out of these smart monstrous camera phones👌👏😎
Xperia will produce the accurate photo & result..
.the professionals would love that & its highly customizable, so it wont be for regular users, also it won't satisfy them..
bt. for the general people (also including me) would love the mi 11 ultras photo..coz
it will produce good phots & easy to use
this video must get more 100k views....
#support you to get 100k views...bhai
loved your comparison alotttttttttt.....
Xperia is very good for me. That portrait photos r really good. Night mode also better than mi11u.
- mi11u user
Both performed well, each one with weaknesses, but quite well. I would be happy with either, at least respect to cameras.
There is another test I don't usually see. That is, quality of pictures for fast moving objects.
There are no few the cases when you take pics and then you find they were all blurred.
Sony argues that their cameras keep quality even for fast moving objects. I would like a comparison with others on that aspect as well.
I like Sony color and tones, natural not over saturated, balance.
super great comparison and thanks for all the true content
Thanks for watching!
This is the first review that the soft skin effect is STILL not disabled in the front camera. Three models and they still haven't turned it off. The software developers can fix this and keep improving the camera, but they update the camera once or twice then stop. I have the first two phones and their tech support KNOWS this is a software issue.
by the way they have added an option hidden in the menu to disable it but enabled by default
@@HansTechTalk Good. A similar option is available on the previous two models, but it stays on. It doesn't support AT&T 5G so this is a no go for me.
Bro it's very clear and useful for me thank you and carry on 👍👍👍👌👌👌
have you joined our fanbase group of this channel brother??
Hater will be hater just buy what you want don't let other influence you, buy sony if you like it or buy xiaomi if you like it. Just accept and love you phone for what he had already have.
Sony Xperia 1 III can't record 8k video because it has only 12mp sensor. To record 8k video the phone must have 33.17MP sensor.
Some phones can record in 8k while still having 1440p displays
@@blackdynamite9940 GR8 logic sir.🙏
At 7:12 I was obviously expecting sony to have better control of lens flare owing to their touted Zeiss t* coating but that is just on paper here. Not that impressed with the camera since the expectations were high with this one.
Finally ❤️ new video, looks from the thumbnail I think xperia 1 iii is better in selfie looks natural to me while mi 11 ultra looks more artificial, can't wait to see the battle of these two as usual I'm rooting for Mi11 ultra 😁
Let's see
forgot to mention on xperia's variable telephoto lens performance will it do a lot of difference or same as oneplus gimmick 😂✌️✌️✌️
:)
Sometimes mi11 ultra sometimes sony.
Mi11 ultra using periscope zoom shots are phenomenon. Very nice colour and rendering and well process , and less nois.
But i prefer over all photo to Sony.
Colour, process, Sharpness and details.
And on the night video. No doubt, ill give it to sony
Mi 11 ultra is clear winner 🏆
But while choosing from both of them I will go for sony experia bcoz or brand value and world class hardware
I'm really surprised, recent Xperia series did have that opinion/fame of being "pro photographer phones", and yet here we are. Great, outstanding, work Han putting this to real test!
Hi Han excellent job nice comparison, mi 11 ultra is the winnet in the most of escenarios. I have a query about photo quality in resolution 12 mp of xperia vs 12mp of mi 11 ultra both perform almost the same amount of detail when cropping but what about resolution 50 mp of mi 12 ultra vs 12 mp of xperia there is much different when cropping ? . Thanks and best regards.
Mi 11 ultra is of course way better on full res photos
Some people might say that I can't buy sony because of terrible front camera but with dedicated shutter button and eye autofocus you can take excellent selfie photos via the back camera without even looking
Han, you are truly #underrated, I love your camera comparison videos, these are more user friendly for general users, not like those Big TH-camrs who talk science in camera comparison vid
Glad you like them!
it seems like that you are a Fan of this channel brother 😇
Bro we have a HansTechTalk FansBase on Facebook, if you like this channel plz Join the FbGroup:- ''HansTechTalk Fans United'' hope you will join its for all the fans of the channel
Most of the time it’s Xiaomi Mi 11 but I really love Sony’s phone since college but unfortunately can’t afford it back then. I hope someday!
Your every comparison video are very nice and honesty. Thank you.
Glad you like them!
Really good and hard work thankyou
Something that very few reviewers fail to mention is how the battery holding up when using the camera app. From what I've heard the Mi 11 Ultra drains its 5000mAh battery like a beast when using the camera. To me, as somebody who uses the camera often that is also very important. Blank statements such as "The Xiaomi is the better phone and clearly takes the better photos" seem very biased and not professional. Sony takes photos that are more true to life, has less aggressive post-processing, exhibits far fewer overexposure issues, has expandable memory and a headphone jack that can be used for an external mic. Also, where is the info on RAW support, focus abilities, shutter lag and so many important details about the camera performance?
The Xperia wins in most cases just because it's hellbent in having tiny amounts of sharpening and contrast / dynamic range tampering compared to a regular flagship like the mi 11 ultra, but I have to say the pixel-peeping pixelation issue is VERY apparent here. Like you said it is true that Xperias suffer from this, it's the one issue the cameras have that other competitors have long figured out and this is coming from a big fan of Sony's phones.
Make no mistake, all the mi 11 ultra is doing is applying more aggressive sharpening and contrast curves that ultimately create bigger halos and artifacts that are very visible in the comparisons and make objects and shapes much bulkier and thicker (which results to that notorious "phone video / photo quality" people refer to), but the pixelation on the Xperia is messing with fine details the likes of narrow repeated patterns. The Xiaomi performs exceptionally well when it comes to microclarity like that and next to a device like the 1 III it looks a lot smoother zoomed in all the way.
There are a ton of other benefits to the 11 ultra's camera system though, including natural bokeh which is a MASSIVE plus not many people seem to care about, it's so rare to find in smartphones, let alone ones that handle overall quality this well. Not even the 12s Ultra with its crazy sensor is able to compete in many areas, including dynamic range and between-camera stability and faithfulness.
Overall, personally, I'm having a hard time finding a winner. The mi 11 ultra has shook my perception of the 1/5 III. I still can't fully like it because it gives a conventional smartphone camera look, meaning it's not concerned with color accuracy or any accuracy really, just pushing for a good realism / social media saturated-type balance, while the Xperia, traditionally, delivers very accurate and natural-looking images with minimal post processing, even if you may miss with its dynamic range while also having to deal with the pixelation microproblem.
If the Xperia had the hardware of the 11 ultra it would destroy competition I say. Kind of ironic considering Sony would be the ones to stick to hardware, like the purists they are, but now we're stuck in this weird situation where Sony has the most advanced software even if they're missing a few things (though missing a night mode is a huge minus) and the more accurate and lightweight processing that would go so well with even better hardware than it already has.
Edit: The mi 11 ultra's sensor isn't a true 48mp. Anything above 16 megapixels on smartphones is a pixel-binned result that ultimately does nothing in terms of quality unless you present the best possible conditions to the phone.
Subscribed. Xiaomi Mi11 Ultra has the advantage of the bigger sensor, but also the phone looks larger and probaly not so confartable to use compared with Xperia 1 III, that has also tha manual photography and video controls, and having the option to record up to 120 fps in 4k you can obtain artistic videos, or good for planetary astrophotography videos
well after having a lot of android and iOS phones I really missed nokia with their carl Zeiss lenses then Huawei came to proof that Leica was doin great, I had iPhone 11pro Huawei P40 Pro and Galaxy S20+ and the best of those was the Huawei with great saturation when you wanted and good color when disabling special features, then I bought the Xperia 1 II and booooy is a whole world difference the color accuracy is exactly of what you seeing the scene interpretation is the best I've ever seen in a while and once you get used to the software you can choose to take really crisp pics, this Sony phones are for those who really love photography definitely not made for the teenager who wants to take a snap on the food and upload it right away, you got to love photo to get pics with Sony phones
Nice video. Could you do a part 2 showing moving things because this is where the Sony is meant to shine. Eg pets and kids. On quite a number of the rear camera shots the Sony looked better balanced that the Mi 11 Ultra. It’s hard to tell properly as TH-cam strips the resolution. Is there a way where you could upload the originals of some of the shots so we can examine them. Thanks again for all your hard effort.
Yeah sure
Yes, try to make a comparison shots of fast moving objects like sports, kids on playground, etc. Sony seems to be pretty confident in that area, i wonder if it's true
Love the mi11. I need to get it but for some reason its hard to find in france:/
as i said before.. bro you're doing great but people didn't go for a long video.. and also do something extra except the camera comparison... 😁❤️ love you From India 🇮🇳
Great review💪
The xiomi's larger 48mp camera lense helps it get more detailed shots during the day, but big up to the sony for almost keeping up with its smaller 12mp camera lense. Sonys pictures had better dynamic range and colour reproductions but xiomi's handled the shadows better.
When it comes to night footage both do a great job with less noise and more details, but i'd give it to sony for more accurate color reproduction!
Wonderful comparison.
I think Mi 11 did well, especially in night mode, if we could compare the price, you would see that sony has more price tag than MI 11, but based on performances MI 11 proved quality with low price tag.
So, i give it to mi11 ultra 👏
Thanks for sharing.
@@HansTechTalk Thanks, I'm honored sir.
I thought xiaomi will destroy sony with its biggest sensor... Wow Sony👍
What counts is how big photo diodes are, not the sensor. Is more important to have 12mp with 2micromm than 108 with 0.7 micromm.
Same way a7SIII kills in high ISO. The larger sensor pixels are better in light sensitivity. Those manufacturers chasing large MP phone camera is just ridiculous when Full Frame cameras maintain at mostly 24MP. Ended up combining the pixels to output 12MP at the expense of extra processing and less light sensitivity. Also reason why Sony can achieve 20fps with minimal processing
I can't wait on Amazon to put up the Mi 11 ultra up for sale. Mi 11 , is my favorite ✌🏻
Han, Could you make low light camera comparison between the Mi 11 Ultra and the S21 Ultra after their latest updates ?
BRAVO!!!
Amazing review, you got a new subscriber. I wanna buy the mi 11 pro but is only for china.
Your tech channel is amazing it needs more audience
Please compare focus tracking and action shots. It doesn't matter if one has slightly better detail when the subject is completely out of focus
The MI did preform better but the Sony has a lot of features aside the camera that I like. Plus I want to learn to use the traditional IOS interface so I can eventually learn professional level photography. It’s a good way to start as I need a new phone. Why buy a phone and a camera when you can have both. And since I’m a beginner I don’t need top quality camera just one I can learn from that does a good enough job
(Edit) the camera is top quality it's an amazing phone so glad I didn't listen to the hate and bought it
I can understand why the Chinese phone wins in zoom or cropped pictures like you said it has more megapixels. But in day time shots I saw it was neck and neck with both having strong points but the colour accurate rendition of the Sony wins it for me. At night it's the same neck and neck, some pictures u uploaded looked better on the Mi phone better exposed and on some other pictures better on the Sony especially when using the main sensor or camera. Front facing that goes to the Chinese phone too. But there's something you don't do which is to test the focusing and picture quality of moving subjects which is a very key experience. People have pets, people see several things daily on the street or when watching live sport they would like to capture. I believe the Sony would crush this Chinese phone in this scenario. You should do comparisons adding this option in your future camera comparisons. It's a very key segment of photography
I'm a sony fanboy myself. I've only used Sony and Google Pixel Phones as androids. But this review is good. Not the comments tho, but definitely the comparison
No Chance for Sony but the zoom King is S21 Ultra
I would still choose the 1 III
Mi 11 ultra is better in these
1.Front camera
2.video stability
3.zoom
4.8k
5.120x supermoon shot
6.video view
7.direct sunlight shot (dynamic Range)
8.night photo sharpness
Sony is better in these
1.colour
2.sharpness
3.more manual Control
4.zoom portrait
Thank you 😁
For Photos, I have to give the point to Xiaomo. Great exposure, great dynamic range, great detail. But I think Sony Xperia does not worse in video. I has better shadow detail which I like. It has also nice professional video modes, like the Sony Venice color profile that only Sony cinema cameras also have. I think Sony is the better choice for people who prefer to take control themselves, while the Xiaomi is perfect for point and shoot. In the end, I would take the Xiaomi though. I think its better hardware will still be great in two years, while Sony is using rather mediocre hardware for its cameras (e.g. much smaller sensor).
Mi11 ultra best auto camera result
But xperia for profesional
Nice comparison, & i agree with all your comments. Mi 11 ultra did better, but the thing that upset me the most is too see that Sony re-used the same flawd front camera that everyone was complaining about from the xperia 1 & xperia 1 ii. That's really a slap in xperia users faces. You'd think after xperia users had to suffer that faulty front camera on the previous 2 flagships Sony would fix that problem on the 3rd release, it's ridiculous.
I'm a xperia user, but for that reason alone I'm gona stay away from the 1 iii, there's no way I'm gona pay $1400 for a phone that re-used the same weak, flawd front camera for the 3rd time on thier flagship regardless of all the complaints by users. For $1400 everything should be perfect or near perfect. I like all the rest of the upgrades to the phone overall, but re-using that same weak front camera a 3rd time & charging $1400 is just a heavy push towards another brand for this year.
@@AndrewSmith-yy4sd well said brother 👏
Agreed, if Sony priced it like the normal MI 11 (which is $800), then it would be much more competitive
4k video
Stabilization on both phones are comparable you can't really notice the difference, also in color mi 11 ultra and sony xperia 1 iii literally looks identical you might say they shot on the same phone 😂 I also noticed on mi 11 ultra's 4k video it has a violet tint. Dynamic range is not really noticeable but when watch it again and again mi 11 ultra's is ahead. In exposure and details are also comparable.😁
Lastly I thought sony xperia 1 iii will go neck to neck with mi 11 ultra 😥 in selfie it looks pretty good in the thumbnail, on my perspective sony make their phone portray reality while mi 11 ultra portrays beauty. Price to performance ratio will go to mi 11 ultra💪💪💪💪😁
Congratulations, it was a good comparison.
In my opinion the ultra takes better photos in all scenes.
In terms of quality price, the mi ultra of course. The Sony it's to expensive... In Europe it may cost 2000€...😬 Personally i think it will not sell to many devices.. But it's my opinion.
I spent 1000€ more fast in one xiaomi mi 11 ultra easy.
Iam following your work for some time 😊
Continuous with good work.
Thanks
Stay well and safe.
Hug from Portugal 🇵🇹
I love Portugal
The Xperia 1 iii costs about 1200€
it seems like that you are a Fan of this channel brother 😇
Bro we have a HansTechTalk FansBase on Facebook, if you like this channel plz Join the FbGroup:- ''HansTechTalk Fans United'' hope you will join its for all the fans of the channel
Também de Portugal, Porto, se tivesse de escolher entre o S21 ultra ou mi 11 ultra, qual acha ser melhor??
@@andresoares6005 eu comprei um 11 ultra.. Ainda estou à espera dele... O s21 é muito bom, mas o 11 ultra é muito bom ++ isto para mim...óbvio..
The front camera on Sony performs the worst among flagships. Considering its price point - 🤢.
Nope, i have Xperia 1 III and isnt so worst.. its like a beginner video for beginners people that buy smartphone, open camera and shot.. Sony its for Pro users, like iPhone does.
Check comparaison between iPhone 12 Pro max vs Xperia 1 Ii/Xperia 1 Iii... Used by pro and not a beginners.
@@EdwardLedger yep. I always use manual mode in selfie. My xz Premium takes very good photos in selfie manual mode...
The front camera is a Samsung sensor, the same sensor used on xperia 1II. Rumors for new xperia 1IV will all utilize Sony's own sensor be it front and back.
Congratulations on your work, I'm Brazilian and I love your channel too!
But I need your help, I have a Oneplus 8 pro, but I want to change, oh I'm in doubt, you've already picked up all of these, which tell me, which you liked best, ZTE axon 30 ultra, Oneplus 9 Pro, or Vivo x60 pro plus???
Op 9 Pro would be a better choice for the best overall performance…
Xperia 1 iii underperforms in auto mode totally..considering the buyers would mostly be the enthusiasts..they are surely gonna play around on the pro mode which can take pictures to a next level..anyways mi 11ultra is super solid..great video
Totally agree
Cery good video! Thank you !
Glad you liked it!
For the colour science I would take Sony all day long
This is why we need xiaomi to improve
You have to do some aggressive pixel peeping to tell the difference. I like both phones but slightly prefer the photos of the 11 ultra but would still probably buy the Sony for expandable storage and microsd.
Great video.. Sony's selfie seems overexposed
In my opinion
Sony Xperia for users who wants natural color and to be edited in Adobe Lightroom
Xiaomi Mi 11 for users who wants point and shot ready for instagram
Why don't compare raw images? This way you can really see what is the censor capable of. As a pro photographer I don't like built in camera processing on any phone. They all apply noise reduction even for daylight scenes and sharpening after that. Looks artificial. But shooting in raw and processing in Adobe Lightroom makes a huge difference. I have mi 11 ultra and shoot only in raw for photo and mcpro24fps for video. Try it and you will see what this cameras are really capable of. On my last travel 95% of photos have been shoot with Mi 11 ultra and my canon 5d mark iv took a rest in backpack :-)
Nice work keep swiming and do your best boss you have much more
Xperia 1 iii will destroy every opponent, but the price will be problem. Over £1000! Its crazy
i like sony but mi11 ultra did a great job in every video mode and night mode. as of now mi 11 ultra the best flagship phone.
if its more expensive than mi 11 ultra, why would anyone buy this... sony is not in the position to price that high, samsung is ahead of them.
Super lyke ❤️love from India
Mi 11 ultra is much better.
And i like your real content
You always show reality
Thanks. Just what I was looking for.
I'm surprised that that Xiaomi did better at 2,9 X zoom.
What do you think about auto focus. Does it work equally?
Sony does a bit better on moving objects
@@HansTechTalk Thanks
How did u make the 1iii night shots so good? Did u shoot it on tripod, and mi11 handheld?
I own an Xperia 5ii and if I put it on long exposure, the dark areas will be ok but the brighter areas will be blown out.
both the phones are attached to the same exoeteded stick and, its handheld
I am sure Xiaomi is going to release another Camera Beast by the end of the year and then Mi 11 Ultra
Sony is good but limited a little by sensor size. Xiaomi has nicer sensors but less natural processing at times.
Would be interesting if you compare pictures of moving subjects as that’s something Sony has advertised a lot
MI 11 ultra Awesome and it has better saturation and click s good photos but xperia is not to far it also take good photos and both are flagship device ..... support from INDIA💪🇮🇳
wow you have done fantastic job, i love the way you are doing comparison only my request is when there is front selfie camera compare would you please show bit more stabiliziation OIS. cheers Namaste ji
bro you look like a true fan of Han 👏
we have a HansTechTalk FansBase on Facebook, if you like this channel plz Join the FbGroup:- ''HansTechTalk Fans United'' hope you will connect with our fan base ❤️
I think the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra did better at night mode sensors because of the better camera hardware (bigger size)
yaaa I also agree with you...what the other aspects of mi 11 ultra you liked the most?
@@sakifshadman4204 Video recording and Portrait
@@michaelwinkler9080 I like its periscope camera the most & the small back disply which can help to get wonderful selfies
@@michaelwinkler9080 Bro we have a HansTechTalk FansBase on Facebook, if you like this channel plz Join the FbGroup:- ''HansTechTalk Fans United'' hope you will join its for all the fans of the channel
WOW 👑 SONY GOD FOREVER#1 ✌️ 👑
The author of the paid troll and his video too
I was expecting the MI 11 Ultra to completely wipe the floor but wow, the Xperia 1 III is closer than I thought. How are your night photos so good? I saw TechNick's review and it looked way worse
agree, Nick's photos of the xperia are just almost black
@@deadworms because he was taking photos in absolute darkness. And tbh i liked the pictures way more than those that Samsung made. Lol somebody needs to explain to samsung that night mode doesn't mean wannabe night vision mode.
and its only 12mp
@@lunaelriku Just watched this on my TV and the Xperia 1 III looks better than the Mi 11 Ultra in low light
Xiaomi seems to use primary colours, especially red, in a more dynamic way. Since life colours are mostly a mix of these the photo are more dynamic during day light hours. At night they have controlled any unnatural light - such as street lamps without diminishing the vibrancy of the colours. Therefore their algorithm is far better than Sony's currently, however, Sony will no doubt update and correct any deficit in the algorithm they use, but they cannot correct the sensors - so Xiaomi wins and is future proof against this current Sony phone. I was very impressed with the definition on the Xiaomi on the final night time walk! One may wish the Xiaomi was the same shape and size of the Sony - which for me is the perfect size! However Sony need to do more camera - wise on their flagship phones! They make cameras ans sensors for so many other companies phones. I am sure they can.
Sony sensors are limited because of the resolution but it has a lot to offer and it seems that is more oriented on the main 12 megapixel sensor.Xiaomi M11 Ultra is a monster with lots of things to offer but the biggest difference is that the Xiaomi is a settled device where Sony just started the race.I believe that in the near future it will be much better than today and and it will imporve on the already good camera.I don't think that Sony can compete in the Zoom or utra wide game but I believe that the main sensor of Sony it will be in top 3 at the end of the day.
like I said both cameras are good..
mi11 ultra produce lucrative, amazing & detailed images..(winner👏)
if you like to take photos professionally & want variation then probably you might go for sony..
overall mi11 ultra wins easily 🙂
Thanks for sharing
@@HansTechTalk Thanks to you Han,for sharing the comparison by spending so much ❤️
Mi 11 Ultra won this comparison. The price of Xperia 1 iii is really too much and I think Sony sales are just going to get worse. Just what I think though. We will know in a few months time. Thanks for the awesome review Han 😊
Thanks for sharing
Nice video 👍👍👍 mi11 ultra is the best
Thanks for sharing
Night photography on the Sony looks more realistic thought it lacks details
111 minutes left🔥
Mi 11 Ultra is a Camera Beast