@@aguyonasiteontheinternet yes but that’s 12.5% + 10% luck + 20% correct edge paring to not get parity + 40% if ur on pb pace + 47% it’s 6x6 + 0.5% because why the hell not so really it’s 100% to get triple parity
Using STM it’s a 12 slice optimal case (11 ignoring equator), but you used face turn metric (less commonly used), where 28 is actually optimal in that metric (27 ignoring equator)
The mid solve parity algorithm is significantly shorter, parity isn't nearly as common as it is on big cube, and there is things you can do to avoid it altogether. That said, if all fails and you get stuck with it at the end, it REALLY punishes you lol. I just finally started learning Square 1 yesterday and my god it's a learning curve coming from 3x3, and I'm sub 25 with full PLL and OLL...
@@sergeantslowpoke1550 I don’t think so parity: 1) the state or condition of being equal, especially as regards status or pay. 2) MATHEMATICS (of a number) the fact of being even or odd.
@@Joker-em6oz it's called parity. Idk much about square 1 but parity is very common in for example 4x4 once you get to 3x3 stage and you get a position which is impossible on a 3x3 (one pair of the edges flipped). See: th-cam.com/video/N7VQs8gEh54/w-d-xo.html
@@Joker-em6oz in the context puzzles modeled as permutation groups (such as Rubik's cubes, 15-puzzles, etc.), the parity describes whether the amount of 2-piece swaps required to solve it is even or odd. On a normal 3x3, ever move swaps 3 corners and 3 edges, which adds up to 6 (even). The same is true for square-1, a move swaps 2 sets of corners and 2 sets of edges, so 4 total, which is even). In this case, only two pieces need to be swapped, which is one swap (odd). This is because the cube was previously in a state where one move didn't necessarily cause an even amount of swaps, but once you get the cube to be cube-shaped again, you you assume you've reduced it to a group in which you'll only need the normal even parity move described earlier. However, it is very difficult to easily tell if you've actually reduced it correctly or if you in fact need an odd number of moves to solve it (which is what happened in the video). To fix it, you do a bunch of set-up moves that lets you get to a state where you can do an odd number of swaps, and then do a bunch more moves to get back to the reduced state, this time with the correct parity. Sorry for the wall of text but I hope it makes sense now why it's called parity
"guess how many moves it takes" Me: 4 pluck out the first one, pluck out the second one, put the first one in the second one's place and put the second one in the first one's place easy gg
Me, someone who bought a rubix cube 3 years ago and almost killed myself trying to solve it and still not solving it to this day just for it to fall in sand which makes it work way worst who than washed it which didn't help but after 2 years all the sand got out who still didn't solve it just for it to fall in sand again to then break it: 258 moves
Learned how to solve it except for the parity. Gotta take my time remembering the parity algorithm. Rest of it was relatively easy to figure out because of my previous experiences with cubes.
![[Live] : ONE 168 วันนี้!! "โจนาธาน vs ซุปเปอร์เล็ก"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0jIN65KgJsI/mqdefault.jpg)
"112"
"28"
"Close enough"
28
🤩 wow
Lol 🤣
Not even close i did 28
I was so close 26
My guess was "too many". I mean I was right
Bro same
Bruh I guessed 47
I guessed "a lot" so I think I got It to
i guessed 10
bruh
“5” dude you didn’t have to destroy my answer
facts i guessed the same thing
Same
Same
I guessed the same thing
Same
Bro I literally said 28 before he started and when he solved it I went straight to a therapist
???
Why would you go to a therapist if you guessed correctly this joke doesn’t make any sense.
Me: 7 moves
Him: 28 moves
Me:meh I was like 1 off
Bruh that’s what I was thinking nah we’re in a simulation
Same
I at least got 17 didn’t think he would get much more
me:a million
I said 27
"So close but so far"
- someone
[Laughts in 6x6 double parity with pops and huge lockups]
6x6 triple parity has a 12.5% chance of happening to you and yet it seems to happen every single solve.
@@aguyonasiteontheinternet yes but that’s 12.5% + 10% luck + 20% correct edge paring to not get parity + 40% if ur on pb pace + 47% it’s 6x6 + 0.5% because why the hell not so really it’s 100% to get triple parity
@@Aerolite_FPS+40% if your on pb pace got me 💀
@@ThanMG lol
@@Aerolite_FPStru dat
Bro your voice is just soothing
My mind : “It’s gotta be 57”
Him: 28
My mind : “ Meh I was just like 1 off that’s pretty close!”
I geussed 57 too lol
Me who said five thousand: *"why are we here, just to suffer"*
I said 6
Did you know Millers real name is Ben
Miller as in the guy who he quoted
I said 50😂😂😂
@@alfiemcdonnell4566 SAME
Hahahhahahahaha lmao 5000 i said 24
Me sees this:
Also me: gets 4x4 parity ptsd flashbacks
28
Using STM it’s a 12 slice optimal case (11 ignoring equator), but you used face turn metric (less commonly used), where 28 is actually optimal in that metric (27 ignoring equator)
Ah, I see.. 🤨
Me:"25"
Me after I see there are 28 moves:"REALLY?!"
He did the bar flip and AUDF though
@@nabranestwistypuzzler7019 hihi;)
I also guessed 25
Props to this man for remembering that combination and doing it twice
@Rodrigo Ribeiro no. he is cuber, he prolly learnt way more complicated algos than this
27
As a cuber I can tell you as you get more experienced and the more you learn algorithms, it'll get easier to learn more
It's muscle memory, he doesn't consciously have to remember it.
This is one of the necessary algorithms while solving sq1. I needed to learn and, now my muscle memory automatically does it.
I feel like this dude would be so good at hand signs
Naruto
I confidently said 14 thinking you only counted the slices
Me: “160”
Him:”28”
Me: “Hey I was pretty close”
Same but I said 50
@pro matthew wdym its so close
@@jawawalando ikr 160 is very close
No u are not
@@Twitter.or.X hey look theres a person who doesnt agree look above this comment
"That's why square-1 was so hard"
My Friend: i cant even do 3x3 rubiks cube
Me watching from behind: 🤣
8
Same.
I can't do 2×2 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
I can't do a 1×1
Me: zero just get some paint
Him: 28
Fr
The most lazy one yet
i think i regret ordering a square 1
12? Just based it on what I do with the normal 3x3… idk 💀
28 TO SOLVE THE LAST LAYER EDGES?!- EEAEAEAEEEAEAEEAAEAE
I guessed 22 ig i was wrong
@@KayceeWonderland OMG Kaycee I love your vids!!!
KAYCEE🙊🙊🙊🙊
Me: 4 moves!
Him: multiply by 7
Mine was the opposite I guessed 7 lol
@@isabellediz2412 so 4x
I thought that same number but i was wrong 😔
Me 24
Him u should plus 4 more
@@isabellediz2412 same
My guess is 28 after hearing the answer. Technically I’m right
Lmao
You're cheating because you already song that video
thats not called guessing?
@@narutosasuke4216 song?
Cap
The mid solve parity algorithm is significantly shorter, parity isn't nearly as common as it is on big cube, and there is things you can do to avoid it altogether.
That said, if all fails and you get stuck with it at the end, it REALLY punishes you lol. I just finally started learning Square 1 yesterday and my god it's a learning curve coming from 3x3, and I'm sub 25 with full PLL and OLL...
I said “8” I was so confident💀💀 but that’s close enough its only 20 more
Teachers: The homework’s easy
The homework:
28
999999999999999999Trillion moves and I was correct 😃
The explanation: th-cam.com/video/zOhDYRE_LHk/w-d-xo.html
I wanted you guys to know. Learnt the parity in 10mins lol
That’s so true though.
You could have made a perfect loop😭
@meme_god I memorized the link so shut up
@meme_god it's the bread meme ;)
@@yuhzimmie7287 bread 👍
2!
1:smash on ground
2:reassemble fully solved
I think someone found a way shorter and easier to learn parity algorithm, but it might not be as ergonomic or efficient for your hands
Me: alot also me: I got it right
Nah you capping
Him: “guess how many moves?”
Me: “why is there black on the cube?”
@Romeo Lacosti imagine not being able to see a joke
@Romeo Lacosti imagine not being able to imagine an imagination of imagining an imagination
26
My 3×3 has black instead of white
The black replaced the yellow
This is why mid parity alg is much more viable
Me: 10
Him: 28
Me I totally got that one right
Lol I chose 20 first then 25 still lost 🤣🤣😂
same lol
Me: "36"
Him: "28"
Me: It's ok I was only 2 off
2?
12 off*
I know I was just joking
@@MrPenguin4547 it’s 8
I said I was joking jeez
thought he was just gonna rip those two pieces off and swap them😂
U good man what u thinking 🤣🤣
I didn't learn how to solve it, but I learnt to count from 1 to 28
Me: 4
Him: 1 2 3 4
Me:ok
Him: 5 6….. 28
Me: Uhhhh 6 idk
Him: 28
Me: WHAT I should quit doing these I’ve seen at least 10
when u started counting i was like “dang i’m not even close”
Yeah i guessed two...
54
Me who doesn’t do square-one: absolute confusion
Teacher: test will be easy
You at home: studies alot
You at school: ready for test
The test:
The fact is he did not messed up while counting, I am amazed
The fact is that @Bhuvan Swaroop messed his typing
@@randombros5509 I did not noticed it
The fact random bros doesn't mean biological bros 🤯 jit trippin
@@Compariz 🤣🤣🤣
My guess was "yo hi wassup I can't process the number so uh yeah bye"
333333333
just memorised that alg today
I guessed 39, as a non-cuber I will guess 39 for eternity
57 I’ve never tried
Add 30 more to that 39 and then do. It to your girl if you even have one
You have 39 likes
My dumb mind: i know that its gonna be at least 1 or 2 steps 😊
When i watch it: i just wanna cry now 😊
How tf would one step fix that
Yeah I thought it would take 3 moves 😅
@@Jay-sf2id i have no idea. My brain lost all its brain cells
Me:28 *joking*
Also me: *goes crazy*
I smell cap
Takes a re-scramble
POV: you just wait till he says how many moves and then you say, “ 28 moves!”
That's just cheating
U have 28 likes wow lol
@@LonelyPotatoplaying haha I changed it to 29
@@dashamold1985 nooooo
@@LonelyPotatoplaying MUHAHAHA
I was thinking 30 when he said 28
me: guess its painting time
Me: let me watch the video and then guess
Me again: 28!
Me: *m o r e t h a n o n e*
Also me: *welp, I'm right!*
me: *said 27*
also the video: 28 moves 😂
Same
i think he knows that i will say 27 cous theres a laugh emoji "😂"
Same
Same
@@AHCA1106 um cause*
Me: probably about 15 moves
Also me: realises that once he passed 20 there was no stopping him
Same I guessed 15
OMG I also guessed 15
Missed opportunity for a loop
Me: 10?
Him: *proceeds to bend time and reality*
Also him: and that’s how to do it!
I though ten to
I thought 10 too
same my guy
Me too
I think 29 🤔
"It takes 28 moves to solve 2 pieces"
Sure, but that wasn't any two pieces, it was a parody when the rest of the cube was solved which is different
I think you mean parity
@@sergeantslowpoke1550 I don’t think so
parity: 1) the state or condition of being equal, especially as regards status or pay.
2) MATHEMATICS
(of a number) the fact of being even or odd.
@@Joker-em6oz it's called parity. Idk much about square 1 but parity is very common in for example 4x4 once you get to 3x3 stage and you get a position which is impossible on a 3x3 (one pair of the edges flipped).
See: th-cam.com/video/N7VQs8gEh54/w-d-xo.html
@@Joker-em6oz in the context puzzles modeled as permutation groups (such as Rubik's cubes, 15-puzzles, etc.), the parity describes whether the amount of 2-piece swaps required to solve it is even or odd. On a normal 3x3, ever move swaps 3 corners and 3 edges, which adds up to 6 (even). The same is true for square-1, a move swaps 2 sets of corners and 2 sets of edges, so 4 total, which is even). In this case, only two pieces need to be swapped, which is one swap (odd). This is because the cube was previously in a state where one move didn't necessarily cause an even amount of swaps, but once you get the cube to be cube-shaped again, you you assume you've reduced it to a group in which you'll only need the normal even parity move described earlier. However, it is very difficult to easily tell if you've actually reduced it correctly or if you in fact need an odd number of moves to solve it (which is what happened in the video). To fix it, you do a bunch of set-up moves that lets you get to a state where you can do an odd number of swaps, and then do a bunch more moves to get back to the reduced state, this time with the correct parity.
Sorry for the wall of text but I hope it makes sense now why it's called parity
Me: waits until he says how many moves to be the coolest in the comments.
“28”
If you can recognize if you have parity in corner permutation it’s only a 7 slice alg
/(3,3)/(1,0)/(4,-2)/(-4,2)/(-1,0)/(-3,-3)/
Him: "Guess how many turns it takes to complete this"
Me: *swaps the pieces*
Yees
XD
Same
Not wanna be a nerd, but it's actually pretty hard to disassemble the square1 cube and put it back
@@gXLg not wanna be an idiot but this was just a joke
Me: "just take the green and red off, and switch them"
I bet you rush your town hall
Bruh
You cant, it’s not stickers
@@pooperdooper3576 indeed , he does .
Me: probably 2 moves Him: *literally starts to count 1-100* Edit:yo thanks for the likes I appreciate it :D
Same
*1-28* you mean
@@kingjulien3463 Your Pfp Makes Me Cry
@@aqlanonn2513 I know he was my hero as well
Same
black instead of yellow on square-1 is tuff
Me: hmmm 8!
Also me seeing how it turns: *visible screaming and confusion*
LOL I guessed eight as well
YO IM IN THE 8 GANG
OMG 8 GANGGG
@@okirom8620 8 GANG
8 gang
"guess how much moves it takes to switch these two pieces"
*patiently watches him fix it*
*forgets im supposed to guess* "12!"
oh no, not 479,001,600
why!?
Yusheng Du: Solves 3x3 in 27 moves
Square 1 edge swap: Solved in 28 moves
28
i already abandoned my unsolved sq1😅😂
Teacher: "The test will be easy"
The test:
I really thought that it was actually going to be 6 whole entire moves My brain: :(
Same
I thought it was 6, but then I guessed 4 lol
I guess 20
Same I guessed 6 too lol
Same !
*Me guessing 29*
*Me after* "ohh shoot I was soo close"
SAMEEEEEEEE!!! I guessed 27 XD
Same I guessed 29
@@ellajeang5487 same bruh
27
Doesn't it have to be an even number?!?!!
As a aquare one solver, i see this as an absolute win😊
When you guess 27:
Ah SHI-
Me: I think 26 moves
Video: It's 28
My inside voice: imossion damage
Me waiting for the video to finish: saying nothing.
Me after the video finished:
*28!*
Lol same
26 moves 13 slashes
I’m still confused because if it takes him like 17 moves just to solve a 13 By 13 so I decided to I guess seven I think I’m going a little crazy
My guess was 30 and my reaction was like wait a minute
My guess was "when the hell is he gonna finish"was i wrong?
But I guess 27.9
@@jacobkrey5403 There is no decimals when counting a move. It's almost like you're talking about a possibility
@@WorldSzno ikr
I personally use the mid solve alg which only has 7 slices but takes longer recognition, it’s also a palindromic alg so easier to remember
"guess how many moves it takes"
Me: 4
pluck out the first one,
pluck out the second one,
put the first one in the second one's place
and put the second one in the first one's place
easy gg
@James Catterson he/she wasnt talking about that
@@notethanyt say they
@@ElijahzAcc ?
me: "more than one"
him: "its 28!"
me: "i was correct r8?"
R/technicallythetruth
Me: 6
Him: 28
Me: how the f
28
Cubeshape parity can avoid ever getting parity. There are too many algorithms tho
Hello me from 1 month ago!?!
I thought it would have been at least a year ago...
I literally guessed 27 and I was like
“YESS I GOT IT” but things change
*p a i n*
Same
@@miellelol *s u f f e r*
I guessed 3. Well i was only a quarter of a hundred off
I guessed 27 too!
Me: more than 1 move
me: more then 20 moves
@@unk0wnnn me: more then 52 moves and less then 54 moves
Me"its only going to take like 5 moves"IT TAKES 28 MOVES
I thought I was the only one who chose 5.🤚🏾😭
Me too
I guess 5 two
Just wait till he finds out the square 2 commutator parity alg
My main event is square 1, and i know it's 28
Lol why
Cap
damn, I'd hate doing square 1 everyday lmao
@@akulfr I know but i like it
@@DodusRex_ cool
Let’s be honest, we didn’t guess 🤣🤣
my guess was 27 thought it would be way too high though 😂
Same
BRO SAME
Same guess bro
Ofc bcs 7 is important in our Minds. I guessed 27 too
13 slices and 13 pairs in parentheses
Me: 5 (said so confidentially)
Him: 28
29
Same
I'm so shy shorts
wow you said so secretly
its confidently, confidential neans its a secret (im such a nerd bruh🤓)
Same i said 24 soo confidentially
I was so off, I guessed seven
I GUESSED 3 CUZ I WAS NOT THINKING
Same
When you guessed 3
Omg how did u know
I guessed 30
Me, someone who bought a rubix cube 3 years ago and almost killed myself trying to solve it and still not solving it to this day just for it to fall in sand which makes it work way worst who than washed it which didn't help but after 2 years all the sand got out who still didn't solve it just for it to fall in sand again to then break it: 258 moves
@@ocean650 that’s… concerning
Just wait to he sees parity on square-2
I changed my guess 8 times and still didn’t get it right
Pov: u watch the video first before you answer.
Yeah thats me my guess is 5
Lmao Elite
I guess 999
@@fischerstube6626 .
I ordered one this week. Let's see how long it takes me to be able to solve it😅
th-cam.com/video/zOhDYRE_LHk/w-d-xo.html
I remember that this video helped learn the algorithm in not too much time
Learned how to solve it except for the parity. Gotta take my time remembering the parity algorithm. Rest of it was relatively easy to figure out because of my previous experiences with cubes.
So all that is left is basically the algorithm this video shows.
I FREAKING MISSED IT BY 1 NUMBER