@@sranang-kino No, I like to pay for my products and encourage everyone else to do so as well. Unfortunately, I have no control over how other people choose to embed the video link. The only time I can do something is if someone reuploaded my content.
Whether you like X-Plane (12 or earlier), MSFS, Prepare3d, FlightGear, or any combination thereof, I think we can all agree on one thing: *Flight simming is awesome, no matter HOW you enjoy the hobby!* 😁
It's a pity there isn't a button for "I really, really like this"! I think there's a lot more to X-Plane 12 than meets the eye, and we're still right at the start of development - the best is yet to come. I was trying out the weather today - took a C172 floatplane up to Stuart Island Airstrip (YRR), current time and date, sunrise, weather = convective deteriorating, and watched what happened. Sat on the end of the runway. It was quite mesmerising! Rain squalls swept by, the wind got really gusty so the aircraft was rocking around, the sun gradually came up, thunder , lightning, trees thrashing around.... and the lighting through the clouds looked completely convincing - I've seen it look that! The only things I was missing were a blanket and a flask of coffee! We just had a thunderstorm here today IRL, and I swear it sounded *exactly* the same. And I totally concur with Gondor Avalon below - what a fabulous hobby we all have, no matter what sim you prefer. We all love flying and are completely spoilt by the choices we have. Total kudos and respect to the legions of people working tirelessly behind the scenes that make it all possible.
It’s in a better state than FS2020 has been over the past two years. The only thing FS2020 has that’s better, in my opinion, is the ground scenery. The rest X-Plane has always done better
@@squadric7722 my current xp11 looks alot better than default 12 the aliasing is somehow worse in 12,Only thing xp does better than msfs is fluidity of the flight model,everything else its not even close.I was expecting better than what 12 currently is.
Yall truly are comparing an early access beta to a game that's been out for a little over two years now, damn. Of course the aliasing will be bad and things buggy, don't expect too much from an unfinished product
I am not an X-Plane guy. I tried it a few versions ago and just couldn't get in to it. I am excited to see X-Plane 12 come out though as it is just more competition, and competition makes vendors up their game, and that benefits us, the sim pilots.
Same here. I have tried it a few times in the past but gravitated back to Microsoft as it was back then (no P3D). But I have not tried it for at least 6 years so I am going to see what version 12 is like. P3D did not really evolve as well as I would have liked in terms of pristine visuals and although I am happy to give it a concession because it is more for training than sight seeing, I still think they could easily have done a lot better. And a poor internet connection means MSFS is out - I consider myself lucky if a 10 GB download is done within 24 hours with several interrupts along the way. I'd have to run the X-Plane 12 DVD version if it were X-Plane assuming the DVd is available to users outside of the US. The only other realistic alternative for me now is P3D, but version 6 requires a permanent internet connection which isn't the case for me (and at this stage I am not enthusiastic enough to pay $500 AUD for the P3D version 6 professional licence!). I tried version 4 P3D and the aliasing on the runways is horrible. They resolved that with version 5 but in version 5 the aliasing of the taxiway signs at night make night approaches unbelievably distracting - like flying into a sparkler show.
Really incredible. The rain, the sounds, even the little trails of water behind the landing gear, and the way the rain gradually diminishes on landing (RV-10). Spot on.
This sim looks great! And of course, it's early access so it will have some imperfections such as overly darkened cockpit lighting and cloud over exposure, but those caveats will be ironed out very soon. I honestly can't wait to buy it!!
Yes and the biggest feckup that I have seen so far is a Boeing FMC in the Airbus 330....OPPS!! Wonder why they chose to go with this and not put In The AB MCDU? Lazy last minute coding........ just pop in the 737 FMC, no one will notice, honest boss!!
@@richardswede a long time ago Laminar already announced a mcdu is work in progress, but will not be included in the beta, because it will not be completed at that time.
Tried the Demo and had to buy it. It’s early access and already so gooood! Dare I say it feels better than MSFS?! The planes just feel better in the air. The motion feels more fluid and you can feel the weight of the aircraft better too. Kind of hard to describe, but it’s just a really nice experience. And the night lighting is mmmmwaaaa! So tasty! The wet reflections are stunning to behold as is the rain on the windshield. So much to enjoy and I’ve only had about an hour flight time. I’m removing a bunch of msfs files to my online storage to make room for my new go-to Flight Sim to grow! Wow, what a ride!
1st thing that stuck out to me while playing demo. The tires don't feel like they are making contact with ground. Like there is no aircraft weight on external aircraft view
I wished the wipers actually wiped away the rain streaks. It would've been really cool if it did that. To be fair, none of the sims that I play do this, at least with the planes that I fly. But overall XP12 looks pretty good!
@@AlexFHDVideos2 The Zibo wipes rain. It's not an XP issue it's a developer issue. FSX never had rain effects. P3D got rain effect about 6 years into its life by a third party developer called TFDI. At first it only worked on the 717 and today only works on a small amount of planes and it most cases also does not wipe.
I’ve seen so many whiners complaining this is no better than 11. So far I am very pleased with the improvements and it is still in beta so I think it will only get better.
Looks really awesome! I have X-Plane 11 and X-plane 12 looks to be a HUGE improvement over the previous version. I'm going to wait until the main release to get it.
@@TheFlightSimDeck They only give you KPDX (Portland). And the time limit as well. Word of warning to the demo users: the sim let's you try and load other ICAOs, but once you do you have no way to go back to the defaults without a reinstall unless you know the airport. So if you want to fly the default airport in the demo, use ICAO: KPDX
@@Nighthawk9611 I am sure the servers were hammered. It happens all the time when something gets released. Doesn't change the fact it doesn't match MSFS yet. I am sure XP will improve though..
@@geekyfreq How doesn't it match it? Granted, the scenery is great in MSFS but the aircraft themselves and flight characteristics are much better and more realistic in XP. I'm here to fly .. not look at the scenery so much!!
I have been an instructor pilot of light and ultralight aircraft for over 35 years, and I honestly do not think the graphics of the FS 2020 scenarios are adequate for the real training of light and ultralight aircraft pilots. Microsoft has designed it (rightly) for those who want to play and not for the training of pilots. for this reason it is much better to take the realism of the X-Plane flight model and build on it autonomously some dedicated scenarios. Which is what has been successfully done with the Italian project of the "VFR ESTREMO"
@@radialb1894 of course I tried to disable all the assists and the cell and in any case the flight model was much worse. The reason is that in FS2020 the flight model is written by a programmer for each individual airplane, while on the x-plane it is calculated automatically by an algorithm based on the dynamics of the fluids on every single surface of each plane. This is the reason why self-built prototypes can reasonably be tested on x-plane and not on FS2020. in summary FS2020 is a magnificent game but it is not (nor did Microsoft ever want it to be) a simulator suitable for training real pilots.
looks great, and before we rush to judgement whether or not people should spend the money on upgrading from x plane 11 or even msfs lets give xp12 a chance..
Yes man! I opened the cockpit door (VR) took a seat in the back and looked out the window and played with the engine sound, really! I think I try XP12 a little more...
Agreed. The props & sprites make a massive difference to VFR and is something really lacking in MSFS2020, despite it being the preferred choice for VFR flying.
Its got a certain old-school charm to it. I dont care that it cant look as real as MSFS Im still a fan of the XP series. Both MSFS and XP will always remain on my system. They can both learn from each other. For example MSFS would do well to copy XPs excellent replay mechanism. XP should copy MSFS Community Folder modding system. Just ONE folder to deal with for adding mods - perhaps one of MSFS best features. One big one XP has up its sleeve - you can enjoy it without need to stream data down the pipe. But most of all we should not bash each other , we are all wannabe virtual pilots. A niche genre in gaming. Lets all get along and enjoy - no matter the platform we use 😀
10:30 I can't believe the new trees still have that stupid backlighting problem where they turn yellow then flash back to green instantly. Guess I'll be using xVision again to get rid of that whenever it's available for X-Plane 12.
I’ll be waiting before I decide to buy it. Particles on tires in the wet but not the engines? If MSFS improve their flight model then I really don’t need XP anymore. Sorry to say Laminar while you have made some very serious steps forward you are still behind the curve with the visuals and that’s a very large part of the immersion
@@BonanzaPilot 100% agree. I only just switched to MSFS from XP11 after the 2 years you mentioned. It’s in a place where I’m happy to use it. It can only improve.
There are some textures missing, like at the Take Off when the engines are at full throttle, there has to be some rain trown back in the air behind the eingines
That airstrip is a free one you can download. I wanted to try it because now all the trees have been replaced automatically. But not every strip looks this nice unless you edit it.
@@TheFlightSimDeck That worked! Though as soon as I go full screen but still in the windowed mode it goes all weird again. Probably a bug? Should I reportit
@@hamish3607 Yeah probably, it seems like a lot of people are having this bug so it's probably already been reported but still, just in case it's not report the bug
Also had some short flights with demo. No surprises about the graphics, if you've been following the developer's updates. The textures do look better, but waiting to see if the A330 systems match up).
You can't compare the two. They use different systems, to achieve similar goals. MS , uses ON the FlY streaming data, WHICH REQUIRES A fast internet connection, to achieve their PHOTO REAL. scenery . And , the system requirements are obnoxious. AND, the system is typical Microsoft tiered. IF you want the real the "STUFF," the eye candy, YOU pay for it. Bronze, Silver and basically GOLD. And, is basically a stripped down SIM, unless you level up. MS is more realistic, but , the cost of the SIM ,and painful, hardware requirements, makes it impractical for the general user. XP Plane 12, comes with a lot more features, and is still only 60.00. I'll go with that all day.
What did people expect from XP12 they already provided a new weather and 3d trees and new ATC system and Seasonal enviroment new A330 and other aircrafts and wet taxi and runway texture and rain drops and animated gateways .... we have always asked for those features and when they provide it still people say it is XP11 it is even a price of one Aircraft in some sims comeon people be fair and appreciatr and support the developer or keep with XP11 or MSFS202
Wonderful flights to X Plain 12✈️👍👌Please tell me, what kind of place is so beautiful, where you put the plane on the road, between the trees?Very beautiful landscape!
My macbook 1max has no such graphics, though i have everything set on max. I’m not against low fps, but i simply do not have such graphics at all. It looks like a different game. What i’m doing wrong? Are there some mods that i need to install?
Yeah, if ONLY the radio chatter sounded like that! I'm exclusively flying in VR these days and it's going to take a lot of improvements in X-Plane for me to stop flying VR in MSFS2020
my take after over a month with XP12: flat flying with Saitek etc peripherials? XP-12 hands down; shorter VR leisure flights with controllers? AeroFly FS 4 hands down
![[MSFS vs XP12] Thoughts after the six flights I did](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Bd5hnl3WBBs/mqdefault.jpg)
*Want to see more X-Plane 12 Action? F14 with carrier, R22, Gliding*
th-cam.com/video/uI-0cX0ePJY/w-d-xo.html&t
He Bro , some website that is promoting a cracked version of this game is using Your Video and TH-cam as reference , or are you behind that?
@@sranang-kino No, I like to pay for my products and encourage everyone else to do so as well. Unfortunately, I have no control over how other people choose to embed the video link. The only time I can do something is if someone reuploaded my content.
The landscape at the bush landing was fantastic, where is this place?
Whether you like X-Plane (12 or earlier), MSFS, Prepare3d, FlightGear, or any combination thereof, I think we can all agree on one thing:
*Flight simming is awesome, no matter HOW you enjoy the hobby!* 😁
what a brilliant comment
It’s a pretty obvious fact but OK 😁
Well said 👍👍🙌
If it wasn't frowned upon would you really only go out with one girlfriend
@@Keitan97 Indeed, but I just felt like it needed to be shouted out with all the tribalism that tends to go on in the hobby. 😁😁
That bush landing scene is seriously impressive in my opinion .
Yep where is that runway?
@@redundantlyuseful3366 I'm actually not sure. But if I had to guess it would probably somewhere in Alaska or BC Canada
It's a pity there isn't a button for "I really, really like this"! I think there's a lot more to X-Plane 12 than meets the eye, and we're still right at the start of development - the best is yet to come.
I was trying out the weather today - took a C172 floatplane up to Stuart Island Airstrip (YRR), current time and date, sunrise, weather = convective deteriorating, and watched what happened. Sat on the end of the runway. It was quite mesmerising! Rain squalls swept by, the wind got really gusty so the aircraft was rocking around, the sun gradually came up, thunder , lightning, trees thrashing around.... and the lighting through the clouds looked completely convincing - I've seen it look that! The only things I was missing were a blanket and a flask of coffee! We just had a thunderstorm here today IRL, and I swear it sounded *exactly* the same.
And I totally concur with Gondor Avalon below - what a fabulous hobby we all have, no matter what sim you prefer. We all love flying and are completely spoilt by the choices we have. Total kudos and respect to the legions of people working tirelessly behind the scenes that make it all possible.
I wonder what people would think about this update if MSFS 2020 was never a thing?
It’s in a better state than FS2020 has been over the past two years. The only thing FS2020 has that’s better, in my opinion, is the ground scenery. The rest X-Plane has always done better
@@Michael-ig8ne far better graphics and world than X plane tho
@@squadric7722 my current xp11 looks alot better than default 12 the aliasing is somehow worse in 12,Only thing xp does better than msfs is fluidity of the flight model,everything else its not even close.I was expecting better than what 12 currently is.
@@William_99640 doubt
Yall truly are comparing an early access beta to a game that's been out for a little over two years now, damn. Of course the aliasing will be bad and things buggy, don't expect too much from an unfinished product
I am not an X-Plane guy. I tried it a few versions ago and just couldn't get in to it. I am excited to see X-Plane 12 come out though as it is just more competition, and competition makes vendors up their game, and that benefits us, the sim pilots.
Same here. I have tried it a few times in the past but gravitated back to Microsoft as it was back then (no P3D). But I have not tried it for at least 6 years so I am going to see what version 12 is like. P3D did not really evolve as well as I would have liked in terms of pristine visuals and although I am happy to give it a concession because it is more for training than sight seeing, I still think they could easily have done a lot better. And a poor internet connection means MSFS is out - I consider myself lucky if a 10 GB download is done within 24 hours with several interrupts along the way. I'd have to run the X-Plane 12 DVD version if it were X-Plane assuming the DVd is available to users outside of the US. The only other realistic alternative for me now is P3D, but version 6 requires a permanent internet connection which isn't the case for me (and at this stage I am not enthusiastic enough to pay $500 AUD for the P3D version 6 professional licence!). I tried version 4 P3D and the aliasing on the runways is horrible. They resolved that with version 5 but in version 5 the aliasing of the taxiway signs at night make night approaches unbelievably distracting - like flying into a sparkler show.
I love the proper engine sound and ATC sound. The way the wipers stop working at the higher speed. Nice realism.
Oh, and the proper main gear drag.
The atc was definitely a vatsim audio recording dubbed over the takeoff..
Really incredible. The rain, the sounds, even the little trails of water behind the landing gear, and the way the rain gradually diminishes on landing (RV-10). Spot on.
The water spraying of the wheels looks cool, but wouldn't the engines on TOGA create a massive spray behind it as well? Or is that still WIP?
@@sushiat probably WIP, they had experimental particle effects in XP11 I wouldn’t be surprised if they rework it for 12.
Thank you, Daniella, for the awesome sound engineering in X-Plane 12! It's gonna get better with updates to come, keep up the great work.
Okay, the bush landing part just looks real to me. That's borderline scary how good graphics have gotten from when I was younger ..
Imagine in 10 to 20 years time especially when VR gets really good
That view of aircraft turning onto runway is fooking amazing!!!! 🤩
This sim looks great! And of course, it's early access so it will have some imperfections such as overly darkened cockpit lighting and cloud over exposure, but those caveats will be ironed out very soon. I honestly can't wait to buy it!!
Yes and the biggest feckup that I have seen so far is a Boeing FMC in the Airbus 330....OPPS!!
Wonder why they chose to go with this and not put In The AB MCDU? Lazy last minute coding........ just pop in the 737 FMC, no one will notice, honest boss!!
@@richardswede a long time ago Laminar already announced a mcdu is work in progress, but will not be included in the beta, because it will not be completed at that time.
@@Nighthawk9611 that maybe, but to see a Boeing computer in my beloved AB, means this is a miss for me
@@richardswede yes, *Boeing FMC is a "PLACEHOLDER" until Laminar finishes custom FMGS for A330*
@@richardswede Isn't sherry picking in an early access, beta, pre version a bit ridiculous, or is it just stupidity?
Tried the Demo and had to buy it. It’s early access and already so gooood! Dare I say it feels better than MSFS?!
The planes just feel better in the air. The motion feels more fluid and you can feel the weight of the aircraft better too. Kind of hard to describe, but it’s just a really nice experience. And the night lighting is mmmmwaaaa! So tasty!
The wet reflections are stunning to behold as is the rain on the windshield. So much to enjoy and I’ve only had about an hour flight time. I’m removing a bunch of msfs files to my online storage to make room for my new go-to Flight Sim to grow!
Wow, what a ride!
Yep it feel better then mfs because it good flight model and instant Werther update
Oh man! Does XP12 come with Husband Stealth mode? Seriously, it’s almost too much to bear… 2 Amazing Flight Sims at once! Exquisite!
1st thing that stuck out to me while playing demo. The tires don't feel like they are making contact with ground. Like there is no aircraft weight on external aircraft view
its another version of xplane 9 and 11 put together lol 😁😁
I wished the wipers actually wiped away the rain streaks. It would've been really cool if it did that. To be fair, none of the sims that I play do this, at least with the planes that I fly. But overall XP12 looks pretty good!
That's because the water is on the inside 🤣
FSX could do this
It's called early access.
@@AlexFHDVideos2 The Zibo wipes rain. It's not an XP issue it's a developer issue. FSX never had rain effects. P3D got rain effect about 6 years into its life by a third party developer called TFDI. At first it only worked on the 717 and today only works on a small amount of planes and it most cases also does not wipe.
Definitely needs new wiper blades on this plane. They do absolutely nothing.
Its got a few bugs so far but its insane im loving it.
MSFS has the same problem non-effective wipers.
@@thegreathadoken6808 No
I got anxiety from those wiper blades not working lol
One of these XP fanboys will tell you it's because it's early access😏.
@3:50 Nice catch of the lightning strike!
I’ve seen so many whiners complaining this is no better than 11. So far I am very pleased with the improvements and it is still in beta so I think it will only get better.
thanks for listing the specs. seems the hardware does a great job.
Will be a great Sim once it is finished - competition is good, even though both games are fantastic anyways. Happy Sim Flying!
ONG THAT RAIN. IM IN LOVE
Looks really awesome! I have X-Plane 11 and X-plane 12 looks to be a HUGE improvement over the previous version. I'm going to wait until the main release to get it.
HUGE isn't the world. Maybe marginal. Just shinier runways and fake volumetric clouds.
I mean that looks like simply awesome 👏
I will probably stick with the DEMO for a while and then eventually buy the full version. For now MSFS is my main sim!
I didn’t check but what kind of access do they give you on the demo? Is it a certain area again?
Same
@@TheFlightSimDeck Yeah, same deal as the 11 demo. All the planes but only one area and 15 minutes of flight time.
@@TheFlightSimDeck They only give you KPDX (Portland). And the time limit as well. Word of warning to the demo users: the sim let's you try and load other ICAOs, but once you do you have no way to go back to the defaults without a reinstall unless you know the airport. So if you want to fly the default airport in the demo, use ICAO: KPDX
MSFS has nothing to worry about at this point. I really hope XP continues to improve..I am sure they will.
@@benos4x4adventures49 Laminar isn’t broke. I couldn’t buy X-Plane 12 because the server was overloaded. Maybe everyone is buying X-Plane 12?
@@Nighthawk9611 I am sure the servers were hammered. It happens all the time when something gets released. Doesn't change the fact it doesn't match MSFS yet. I am sure XP will improve though..
@@geekyfreq How doesn't it match it? Granted, the scenery is great in MSFS but the aircraft themselves and flight characteristics are much better and more realistic in XP. I'm here to fly .. not look at the scenery so much!!
@@davidhuett3579 lol
@@davidhuett3579 That is totally fine, but let's not forget that there is a thing called "VFR" that totally belongs on watching scenery ;))
11:02 the way the sun hits the forest trees looks much better than fs2020
How the plane takeoff with flaps up?
12:00 where is this? is this default scenery?
1:32 The horizontal stabilizers actually vibrate like they do in real life.
I noticed that too. Amazing attention to detial.
Same in helicopters. R22 shakes it compass.
I have been an instructor pilot of light and ultralight aircraft for over 35 years, and I honestly do not think the graphics of the FS 2020 scenarios are adequate for the real training of light and ultralight aircraft pilots. Microsoft has designed it (rightly) for those who want to play and not for the training of pilots. for this reason it is much better to take the realism of the X-Plane flight model and build on it autonomously some dedicated scenarios. Which is what has been successfully done with the Italian project of the "VFR ESTREMO"
FS2020 has realism settings. I think u didn't notice. U can turn all assists off and the airframe / flight model is much superior to XP11.
@@radialb1894 of course I tried to disable all the assists and the cell and in any case the flight model was much worse. The reason is that in FS2020 the flight model is written by a programmer for each individual airplane, while on the x-plane it is calculated automatically by an algorithm based on the dynamics of the fluids on every single surface of each plane. This is the reason why self-built prototypes can reasonably be tested on x-plane and not on FS2020. in summary FS2020 is a magnificent game but it is not (nor did Microsoft ever want it to be) a simulator suitable for training real pilots.
looks great, and before we rush to judgement whether or not people should spend the money on upgrading from x plane 11 or even msfs lets give xp12 a chance..
I totally agree
There's no possible way that you can beat that a330 sound
Yes man! I opened the cockpit door (VR) took a seat in the back and looked out the window and played with the engine sound, really! I think I try XP12 a little more...
The last landing was at Machmell fisheries I guess. was it the default? it looked so good.
Correct, that’s a free strip you can download. Already takes advantage of the new trees because it’s mostly auto gen.
One thing MSFS2020 Doesn't have is DYNAMIC RAIN and wipers that actually move the rain... Looks absolutely AMAZING!!!
Something about the environment and depth of field seems more realistic than FS2020
10:30 Wow.Map, flight and plane- its GREAT
I’ve never liked x plane but I’m very grateful that it exists.
and ground textures and detils like trunks are very great
Agreed. The props & sprites make a massive difference to VFR and is something really lacking in MSFS2020, despite it being the preferred choice for VFR flying.
i cant wait to buy this i love it i waited it for long time we all did damn that bush trees rain effect awsome
Its got a certain old-school charm to it. I dont care that it cant look as real as MSFS Im still a fan of the XP series. Both MSFS and XP will always remain on my system. They can both learn from each other. For example MSFS would do well to copy XPs excellent replay mechanism. XP should copy MSFS Community Folder modding system. Just ONE folder to deal with for adding mods - perhaps one of MSFS best features.
One big one XP has up its sleeve - you can enjoy it without need to stream data down the pipe.
But most of all we should not bash each other , we are all wannabe virtual pilots. A niche genre in gaming. Lets all get along and enjoy - no matter the platform we use 😀
So many memories on FSX ! Such a great sim
definately a lot easier to spot FSX dead straight dead flat runways...ILS on X-plane a must!
this people did put time for start looks crazy awsome
10:30 I can't believe the new trees still have that stupid backlighting problem where they turn yellow then flash back to green instantly. Guess I'll be using xVision again to get rid of that whenever it's available for X-Plane 12.
It looks very nice, sounds are great. Will wait to see the full list of features.
Looks and 'feels" great! (just my impression of this video)
Not a bad assessment… it’s not nearly as bad as the comments allude it to be.
I noticed that the wipers wasn't interacting with the precipitation on the wind shield.
They work until a certain speed 1:22
I was underwhelmed for almost all of the video until the Bush landing! That looks incredible!
@7:54 The windscreen rain-sweeps moved... Micro-micro-burst? Nice.
The bush landing strip and the super cub both look really impressive! Nicely detailed environment when up close
that's gotta be a hand made area though
Yeah for sure! Those logs, underbrush and detailed strip do look pretty precise.
A Ziboed/Modded A333 will be sooo good.
I think it's going to happen for sure. Good starting point for a small team.
those puddles are mildly goody
I’ll be waiting before I decide to buy it. Particles on tires in the wet but not the engines? If MSFS improve their flight model then I really don’t need XP anymore. Sorry to say Laminar while you have made some very serious steps forward you are still behind the curve with the visuals and that’s a very large part of the immersion
been a couple years now. MSFS still has a long way to go on both systems and flight model...
@@BonanzaPilot 100% agree. I only just switched to MSFS from XP11 after the 2 years you mentioned. It’s in a place where I’m happy to use it. It can only improve.
Both Sims have their pros and cons, but I think it's safe to say XP12 will have much better default aircraft.
The A330 has a Boeing fms 😂
Thanking you in advance.
Nice, would someone please say the location at 11:15 . Thanks!
Darude Sandstorm
Machmell Fisheries
@@TheFlightSimDeck Thanks a lot !!
fps are lower than xp11?
Just Amazing.
I love this so much!!
What addons were used to achieve the near true-to-life world scenery in the bush landing?
I used Propstrike Studio scenery. They have a free one you can try too. propstrikestudio.com/
might as well turn the wipers off, not having any effect on the rain on the windshield, lol
Did you guys notice the wiper blades don't actually remove water from the windshield?
1:22 you can see it better, but it dissipates with speed.
What’s with all the little puddles on cockpit view but not on exterior views?
Cockpit was real time and the external was all replay. Between that maybe it removes them on replay.
I bought the first microsoft fs, came on a floppy disk and used my neighbors comador 64. I thought that was good.
Wow! They are starting to catch up with FSX...
In terms of graphics trees and vegetation looks better (tho it is not so procedural) and clouds are very interesting
There are some textures missing, like at the Take Off when the engines are at full throttle, there has to be some rain trown back in the air behind the eingines
It's called early access.
The gravel airstripmis really stunning but.... are all so detailed like this one or is a custom one?
That airstrip is a free one you can download. I wanted to try it because now all the trees have been replaced automatically. But not every strip looks this nice unless you edit it.
what airfield was the bush landing at?
You can all see that hideous Anti-Aliasing shimmering in the distance right? When will that get fixed? Other sims have that issue too. Visible at 0:05
Amazingly beautiful
Absolutely awesome. Some reason when I’m on max graphics my textures: liveries, writing in aircraft, runway textures are bad
Maybe a screen resolution conflict? I’ve been running it windowed.
@@TheFlightSimDeck Could be. Everything else seems fine though. I’ll give it a try
@@TheFlightSimDeck That worked! Though as soon as I go full screen but still in the windowed mode it goes all weird again. Probably a bug? Should I reportit
@@hamish3607
Yeah probably, it seems like a lot of people are having this bug so it's probably already been reported but still, just in case it's not report the bug
is this plane default comes with xplane or purchase
The wipers don't actually move the water?
Also had some short flights with demo. No surprises about the graphics, if you've been following the developer's updates. The textures do look better, but waiting to see if the A330 systems match up).
The A330 systems are like all their other default planes.
I heard the xplane forum is attempting to zibofying the a330 lmao
Looks great
The wipers were not doing anything to the water on the windshield. The water looked inside of the cockpit.
can't it be due to rain drops are faster on windshield because airflow, comparing to speed of wipers?
does it still run on Vulcan....I have xp11 and orbx ..if I get xp12 will I have to install orbx again
On the surface MSFS looks so much better but I've got no idea on the flight model difference. Those of you with experience of both, what do you think?
You can't compare the two. They use different systems, to achieve similar goals. MS , uses ON the FlY streaming data, WHICH REQUIRES A fast internet connection, to achieve their PHOTO REAL. scenery . And , the system requirements are obnoxious. AND, the system is typical Microsoft tiered. IF you want the real the "STUFF," the eye candy, YOU pay for it. Bronze, Silver and basically GOLD. And, is basically a stripped down SIM, unless you level up. MS is more realistic, but , the cost of the SIM ,and painful, hardware requirements, makes it impractical for the general user. XP Plane 12, comes with a lot more features, and is still only 60.00. I'll go with that all day.
What did people expect from XP12 they already provided a new weather and 3d trees and new ATC system and Seasonal enviroment new A330 and other aircrafts and wet taxi and runway texture and rain drops and animated gateways .... we have always asked for those features and when they provide it still people say it is XP11 it is even a price of one Aircraft in some sims comeon people be fair and appreciatr and support the developer or keep with XP11 or MSFS202
,?
Dude a330 has a 737 fmc in 2022..
@@berkorhan3399 Dude custom mcdu for a330 is work in progress according to Laminar a few months ago. Have some patience!
Because troll trash have nothing better to do with their lives.
the plural of aircraft is aircraft, not aircrafts
Why are the puddles so random?
What ever happened to the the flap settings for take off ?
Never flown on the a330 before. Are the sounds realistic?
Yes, they are realistic, considering that these are the default sounds
@@Kyabetsuu what is not realistic is the mcdu like how you put a Boeing fmc in an airbus? the disrespect.
@@masflow09 Yes, I have noticed that, and I was very upset because I really wanted to fly a good A330 for the first time! (I did not like JAR A330)
is there VR support in X-Plane 12 ?
Wonderful flights to X Plain 12✈️👍👌Please tell me, what kind of place is so beautiful, where you put the plane on the road, between the trees?Very beautiful landscape!
Best flight sim
what really matters is u injoy flying u injoy ur flight controlls thats all
Is there a speed restriction on wipers?
Yes, 230 knots which was busted towards the end of the clip worrying about camera work lol.
Rain on the windscreen and the trees looks way much better than in MSFS.
Thanks!
Waht's your Camera Control?
I was using the default camera system with an app called FaceTrackNoIR, tracks the movement of my face.
Runs on my iMac M1. Not great, but doable. Cockpits are hard to read though, even on your settings
after thrust set windshield was not seen as worked
I like it how actually the windshield wiper, wipes off the rain droplets :-) Not like in MFSF.
No, if the raindrops move (see at the take off) then the wiper also does nothing!
Somehow, (I am VR Simmer MSFS with Motion Rig) I didn´t stop "playing" it last evening for trial on my desk with only mouse input in VR....
My macbook 1max has no such graphics, though i have everything set on max.
I’m not against low fps, but i simply do not have such graphics at all. It looks like a different game.
What i’m doing wrong?
Are there some mods that i need to install?
How is it in VR?
Bush Landing, is this a addon Scenery ? or can be xplane by default looks so good ?
It’s a free add on scenery by prop strike studios. It could look this way default if they put the effort into a few locations. They really should.
Yeah, if ONLY the radio chatter sounded like that! I'm exclusively flying in VR these days and it's going to take a lot of improvements in X-Plane for me to stop flying VR in MSFS2020
amazing !
my take after over a month with XP12: flat flying with Saitek etc peripherials? XP-12 hands down; shorter VR leisure flights with controllers? AeroFly FS 4 hands down