I love the idea of playing the Mike (a plug linebacker) to the side of an open B-Gap. Putting the 3 Tech to the side of the Rush End also lets you play a smaller/quicker Rush End in my opinion because he can be a box player instead of a wrong-arm spiller
NATIONAL DEFENSE FOOTBALL CLINIC in Vegas April 13-14. 36 hours of nothing but defense. very intense instruction. Go to www.nationaldefenseclinic.com for more info. (goes live Jan 8)
Out of curiosity what is your purpose for having the Nose and 5 tech to the call side? Do you do this based on the tendencies of teams you play, or a specific philosophy you have as a defensive coach?
I think it is to give a numbers advantage in coverage. So to the strong side if you count the Mike, by going (under) to the strength they have 4 over 3 to that doubles side assuming that a back out of the backfield to that side would be the #3 receiver. To the back side assuming the other back releases then you have 3 over 2. Where as doing it conventional you match up but you don't have the extra guy.
We do the same thing with our front and the groups always travel together. (Although, we always set the defense to the wide side, SPUR and his group to wide side. We can call "Kick" by the Mike L.B.er and only the middle four would move opposite and change gap responsibilities depending if we want the 3 tech to the back or away from back. Numbers (receivers) to the boundary, we would change coverages. Will Backer would have to wall number 3 on trips
another question I have is having personal constantly flipping to the strong side, how well does that go against hurry up offenses 🤔 Thinking out loud, I'd probably have the striker go to field side if the formation is 12 and balanced, or to the slot/ double TE side.The philosophy at LB almost reminds me of some 34 schemes where one inside LB is a big body LB and the second is a smaller, sideline to sideline type of player. I'm wanting to get into coaching and I've been looking at the 4-2-5 defense but also wanting to mix in some 3-4 concepts as well. a hybrid defense if you will. kinda like the Midshipmen defense.
Coach Albaugh I thought I was going crazy for a sec. Nice pair of videos though, 42 is one of two defenses I prefer to run. Anymore from him coming up or just the two?
Thanks for the thorough analysis of how you handle the deep out/post in Blue. Great stuff.
Great stuff Coach. How does motion affect your assignments, say out of a 2x2 formation?
This is awesome thank you the 4-2-5 is my fav defense
I love the idea of playing the Mike (a plug linebacker) to the side of an open B-Gap. Putting the 3 Tech to the side of the Rush End also lets you play a smaller/quicker Rush End in my opinion because he can be a box player instead of a wrong-arm spiller
How does 3 recievers affect the Blue match coverage to the field?
Where was this defense when I was at Olivet
Best type of defense 4-2-5
NATIONAL DEFENSE FOOTBALL CLINIC in Vegas April 13-14. 36 hours of nothing but defense. very intense instruction. Go to www.nationaldefenseclinic.com for more info. (goes live Jan 8)
what are your thoughts on Navy running a 425 but using 34 principles with their raider and striker hybrid positions?
Out of curiosity what is your purpose for having the Nose and 5 tech to the call side? Do you do this based on the tendencies of teams you play, or a specific philosophy you have as a defensive coach?
I think it is to give a numbers advantage in coverage. So to the strong side if you count the Mike, by going (under) to the strength they have 4 over 3 to that doubles side assuming that a back out of the backfield to that side would be the #3 receiver. To the back side assuming the other back releases then you have 3 over 2. Where as doing it conventional you match up but you don't have the extra guy.
We do the same thing with our front and the groups always travel together. (Although, we always set the defense to the wide side, SPUR and his group to wide side. We can call "Kick" by the Mike L.B.er and only the middle four would move opposite and change gap responsibilities depending if we want the 3 tech to the back or away from back.
Numbers (receivers) to the boundary, we would change coverages. Will Backer would have to wall number 3 on trips
How do you line up in 2x2
another question I have is having personal constantly flipping to the strong side, how well does that go against hurry up offenses 🤔
Thinking out loud, I'd probably have the striker go to field side if the formation is 12 and balanced, or to the slot/ double TE side.The philosophy at LB almost reminds me of some 34 schemes where one inside LB is a big body LB and the second is a smaller, sideline to sideline type of player.
I'm wanting to get into coaching and I've been looking at the 4-2-5 defense but also wanting to mix in some 3-4 concepts as well. a hybrid defense if you will. kinda like the Midshipmen defense.
Hey coach how would you handle these run&shoot concepts the Go Route Slide Route Switch Route?
IRON5 yt? F2f hob gg tee
What kind of personnel do you want for your LBs and DBs? Do you have a legit run stopper 8 up?
This a repost?
Yeah! I spelled Bourbonnais wrong in the first video so I fixed it and reposted. Then deleted the first one! Sorry to confuse you!
Coach Albaugh I thought I was going crazy for a sec. Nice pair of videos though, 42 is one of two defenses I prefer to run. Anymore from him coming up or just the two?
These were the only two from him.
I think you meant to say 4-4