American Reacts Fly With RAF's Quick Reaction Alert Crews

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 567

  • @MLWitteman
    @MLWitteman 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +263

    The neighbors of the UK, all of them allies, control the aerospace around Britain. So the pilots of the Royal Norwegian, Royal Netherlands, Royal Belgium & French air forces might intercept these airplanes. So the UK is probably one of the safest places in Europe. As a Dutchman I can say, that our Royal Air force intercepts quite a lot of Russian air planes. After they leave our airspace, our neighbors take over the interception. Because the air controllers always stay in touch about these things, with their colleagues in other countries.

    • @polarisukyc1204
      @polarisukyc1204 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I’m honestly never thought about that, it’s very interesting

    • @philipareed
      @philipareed 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      *neighbours

    • @MLWitteman
      @MLWitteman 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      @@philipareed yeah I know. American autocorrect. My high school English teacher would be disappointed too.

    • @rexex345
      @rexex345 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Its a net of collective "fuck off". The time it would take for you to escape, bypass or fight off one set of interceptors, an exponential amount are now swarming you.

    • @tejmason4310
      @tejmason4310 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Too bad we couldn’t say the same thing during the Battle of Britain ey, butt folded early didn’t they 😂

  • @JJ-of1ir
    @JJ-of1ir 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +155

    It may not be the Cold War in the USA, but here it hasn't stopped

    • @adriandaw3451
      @adriandaw3451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russian bombers test the UK airspace very regularly. Tsar Putin has redeclared the cold war.

    • @brownwarrior6867
      @brownwarrior6867 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      The Cold War on both sides was funded by the same Major Banks.
      “The few who could understand the system (cheque, money, credits) will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favours, that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting the system is inimical to their interests.” _Nathaniel Meyer Rothschild, speaking to a group of international bankers_
      “If you have to ask how much it costs, you can’t afford it” _JP Morgan_
      “The way to make money is to buy when blood is running in the streets”. _John D Rockefeller_

    • @MoofyYT
      @MoofyYT 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Yep, it's fairly routine that russian aircraft will skirt the line or temporarily invade british airspace to test QRA.

    • @real4183
      @real4183 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The USA supplies the most money and weapons to the war in europe, clearly they are part of this new cold war. Which isn't really new 😂

    • @real4183
      @real4183 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      This kid has no idea 😅

  • @FrowningIke
    @FrowningIke 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +83

    0:54
    The Russians frequently skirt our airspace, almost for fun it seems. They also send assassins to admire our Cathedral spires for some reason.

    • @user-wc8fp4cx6c
      @user-wc8fp4cx6c 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The reason is probably because the US and UK do the same thing near Russia's airspace.

    • @damonburroughs5283
      @damonburroughs5283 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      ​@@user-wc8fp4cx6cNot really, not until recently, and usually UK aircraft are Recon aircraft, Russia flies bombers up the British channel and always have. I would presume the citizens of Russia are unaware of the posturing that has always gone on

    • @obi-ron
      @obi-ron 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The "assassins" are probably looking to see if the spires are giving off vapour while they're being fuelled for launch. Isn't paranoia a wonderful thing?😅😅.

    • @user-wc8fp4cx6c
      @user-wc8fp4cx6c 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@damonburroughs5283 *Yes, really.* The US and it's allies have buzzed near Russian airspace for decades.

    • @dutchbachelor
      @dutchbachelor 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@damonburroughs5283 Ehm, look up "Operation Chrome Dome". So, yeah, the west used to do that too. Probably where the Russkies got the idea from. Later it we deemed it to costly and risky, with the Palomares and Thule incidents being the final nails in the coffin of that Strategy. And the subs and ICBMs were becoming better, which also played a role.
      So no, @user-wc8fp4cx6c we don't do the same. They send heavy bombers like Tu-95, Tu-16 (actually don't know if they are still being used), Tu-22M and Tu-160 that - for all we know - could be armed with nuclear weapons, we send intelligence gathering aircraft like AWACS and other specialist aircraft and fighters to deter them. It's a game that has been played for more than half a century now.

  • @jboustead13
    @jboustead13 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +78

    Fun fact. The pilot ‘Jon’ who’s featured in this video is currently Red 1 in the Red Arrows. His name is Jon Bond.

    • @burtlangoustine1
      @burtlangoustine1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Callsign: Jovi, surely??

    • @Joe_Sheffield
      @Joe_Sheffield 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Im sure he will appreciate yoi for doxing him haha 😉

    • @Tortex88
      @Tortex88 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Now he's not on 'active operations', not a problem ​@@Joe_Sheffield

    • @TexasRancher22
      @TexasRancher22 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Why are you lying ? Jon is now a sidemen member and goes by the name of miniminter

    • @raheemabdul1066
      @raheemabdul1066 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TexasRancher22 your mom is a sidemen

  • @iansaunders7090
    @iansaunders7090 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    We get Russian bombers flying over the North Sea close to our airspace all the time , the Euro fighters from Coningsby fly over where I live on the East Coast every single day . If it is a real call out they sometimes go supersonic as they are going over the coast and we get a sonic boom!

    • @stephensmith4480
      @stephensmith4480 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      A girlfriend of mine from many years ago was a ATC at Coningsby when they had Vulcans based there. When they were Re-tasked to Fighter command and they got the Tornado's she said it was like being in a different Air force, the tempo went completely mad and the slow lazy days were a distant memory.

    • @iansaunders7090
      @iansaunders7090 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@stephensmith4480, Coningsby also had Lightnings at one stage , now that was an aircraft that made the hair on your body stand up when they were scrambled , in some ways they would still leave the modern fighters for dead !!!!

    • @stephensmith4480
      @stephensmith4480 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@iansaunders7090 A friend of mine used to make the Nose cones for The Lightening. A small handful were still flying in South Africa until 2009.

    • @iansaunders7090
      @iansaunders7090 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@stephensmith4480, I believe they only had two in South Africa and without BEA backing no one will be able to fly them again as is the case with the Vulcans . Once a military aircraft is decommissioned and sold to the private sector they come under the responsibility of the CAA who say that the aircraft has to come up to the same standards as a civil aircraft and that is very difficult and very costly.

    • @stephensmith4480
      @stephensmith4480 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@iansaunders7090 Yes I agree about the logistical difficulties in maintaining an Aircraft to the required standard as laid down by the governing body, as you say, very costly. The Lightening's were Based at Thunder city and there were Three of them.

  • @memkiii
    @memkiii 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    "This isn't the cold war anymore." Ermm... Have you been asleep for the last two years?

  • @LittleBallOfPurr
    @LittleBallOfPurr 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    With regards to being 99% 'boring', there's a phrase I've often heard military men use, "Hurry up and wait."

    • @dutchbachelor
      @dutchbachelor 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Nothing more true in military service. It's absolutely mind-numbingly boring most of the time, but in an instant you have to be alert and ready to do right thing. No matter if it is 3 am in the morning. No matter if you just hiked up a mountain carrying 25 kg on your back. No matter if you only had 3-4 hours of sleep in the last 36 hours. It's also why military men quickly learn to sleep anywhere in pretty much any position and regardless of the circumstances. Even though I only did my draft time, I can still sleep with a full-on battle running on my TV (movie, documentary etc.) in the background.

  • @knowledge-seeker-x7u
    @knowledge-seeker-x7u 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    If I retire with 'no kills' as you say, in my opinion my training and all those flights have done their job.

  • @WhadifuzAlottanois
    @WhadifuzAlottanois 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    Russia makes moves every day against NATO. Just enough to be annoying and keep things as tense as possible... Like the incident in Alaska the other day where China came along to play...

    • @mikeymike1854
      @mikeymike1854 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      America does the same old news as this happens all the time for decades

    • @dutchbachelor
      @dutchbachelor 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mikeymike1854 No. America does NOT do the same. The days of Chrome Dome are over. So there are no B-52s, B-1Bs or B-2s constantly probing and provoking their defenses.

    • @MachikoNoguchi-616
      @MachikoNoguchi-616 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah which was only to be annoying as they wouldn't use planes if they where to nuke anyone as they have nuke's that can be launched from pretty much anywhere and can't be shot down

  • @Radio478
    @Radio478 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I'm UK, great support for our 24/7 readiness

  • @stevo728822
    @stevo728822 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    My father served in the RAF. He was ground crew maintaining the radio and radar on fighter planes including the Hunter, Lightning and Phantom. He also worked on the Bloodhound missile and V bombers.

    • @20chocsaday
      @20chocsaday 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's good.

  • @Avfc-m4w
    @Avfc-m4w 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    We have alot of Russian visitors in our airspace.

    • @CharlesDickson-nv2ol
      @CharlesDickson-nv2ol 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Just outside our airspace

    • @user-xq8vv7pq6j
      @user-xq8vv7pq6j 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No we don't.

    • @CeleWolf
      @CeleWolf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@CharlesDickthey come in occasionally
      son-nv2ol

  • @pogo930
    @pogo930 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    They said they don't want to give their surnames for security reasons, but then the film shows the aircraft taking off with the name Squadron Leader Robertson on the side

    • @Enhancedlies
      @Enhancedlies 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      dont think too much

    • @Markus117d
      @Markus117d 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      The name on the side doesn't necessarily match the pilot, imagine you have a pilot who's just coming off shift, And the relief pilots plane has a technical fault, Would the pilot about to come off shift have to pull a double because the plane with thier name on it is good to go 😂

    • @memkiii
      @memkiii 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The names are just randomly assigned from the Roll, and are not really a "thing". The RAF does not have aircraft dedicated to one person, nor does it have groundcrew dedicated to one aircraft, often the Boss will have his name on an aircraft that may or not be his favourite, but that's it.

  • @MrRupit123
    @MrRupit123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    You seem like a quite intelligent young person. I'm enjoying your content. I've now subscribed. Your last 45secs of this video convinces me that you are a worthy person. Finally there is hope for your generation.😊

  • @goldenlabradorskye
    @goldenlabradorskye 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    We get russian jets quite often trying to entire our airspace

    • @gibson617ajg
      @gibson617ajg 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Trying? They could enter British airspace whenever they want. Whether they do or not is down to them, not Britain. Russian fighters are far better than anything the RAF has.

    • @dockingtroll6801
      @dockingtroll6801 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@gibson617ajg How would they get to british airspace?? Apart from that... 2 words... EuroFighter Typhoon

    • @AgentTokyo78
      @AgentTokyo78 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      ​@@gibson617ajgwhat rock have you been hiding under.....think you need to be loved 😂😂. Your comment laughable

    • @dannyking4138
      @dannyking4138 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@gibson617ajg idiot

    • @colinharbinson8284
      @colinharbinson8284 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@gibson617ajg High quality sellotape and cardboard, flown by what's left of the professional russian army😜😜

  • @paulkemp4559
    @paulkemp4559 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Top fact, no matter where you are in the UK you’re never more than 79 miles from the coast. UK boarder only extends 12 miles of the coast but the UK Airspace area of interest extends an awful lot further out, that’s why we look out a very long way for military threats

    • @Joe_Sheffield
      @Joe_Sheffield 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Uk border is at the point of entry, i think you are confusing this with the 12mile maritime line that extends around ALL countries

    • @CeleWolf
      @CeleWolf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's a myth

    • @norfolkronin6307
      @norfolkronin6307 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm afraid to say there scope will be global.

  • @kentthompson3836
    @kentthompson3836 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    As you have seen from the video, the jets will intercept a suspect aircraft before it enters Uk air space. They would normally intercept the Russian aircraft over the North Sea, apart from warnings, they cannot do anything until they enter UK airspace.
    London is too close to the edge of our airspace to leave it until an aircraft enters it.

  • @stevecummings2703
    @stevecummings2703 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I was lucky enough to spend a few years flying the aircraft used in the filming as the “target” for the QRA intercept. Our “day job” was Electronic Warfare and threat simulation for the RAF and the Royal Navy. We would do several of these unidentified target missions every year, the response was always immediate and a fully armed Typhoon sitting alongside certainly gets your attention.
    To answer a couple of your questions: The time between detection and London could be very short, however we would expect the French / Dutch or other NATO partners to already have a handle on the situation and effect a handover to RAF interceptors. European air defence is very well integrated.
    As for communications, we would expect any aircraft to be monitoring the “Guard” radio frequencies in order to be able to respond. Failing that crews should be trained in the hand signals and wing-rocking manoeuvres of the interceptors and, as was the case with the Latvian aircraft, simply follow your interceptor to where he wants you to go, knowing that his fully armed mate is sitting in you six o’clock waiting to do his ultimate job if required.

  • @ClassicRiki
    @ClassicRiki 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Yes…this is a brilliant video. Saw this straight away 🎉

  • @Merciuh
    @Merciuh 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Yes, the reason they get so close is so that the pilots can see and signal to each other if there are genuine comms problems. They can communicate that they can hear but not speak, or vice versa or have total loss of comms.

    • @leestockton9367
      @leestockton9367 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Do they communicate like Goose did in Top Gun (🖕)

    • @B-A-L
      @B-A-L 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@leestockton9367No because that's not real and Britain knows what the meaning of the word respect is.

  • @jasonc5413
    @jasonc5413 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    The Cold War didn't really end, it just got colder.

    • @polarisukyc1204
      @polarisukyc1204 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@paultaylor9498well, he’s got a point, even if he’s technically not correct. How many times do you think the Russians try sabre rattling like what they do with their subs and aircraft?

    • @polarisukyc1204
      @polarisukyc1204 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@paultaylor9498 I’m not denying that it’s cooled down considerably, Russia certainly isn’t as intimidatory as the Soviet Union was, but they still do try annoy us

    • @stewartmackay
      @stewartmackay 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@paultaylor9498 I do and yes, he's right.

    • @burtlangoustine1
      @burtlangoustine1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hang on, so according to you guys, Peace is simply a extremely cold cold-war? All attached to a national military with long memory and old scores to settle? I guess this likely linked to the toppling of Russian royalty? Whatever happens, thanks is due to Russians for beating Hitler at a cost of 27,000,000 million military and civilian deaths. They cleaned up Chernobyl. They achieved what no other could for the sake of humanity, albeit in poor style. Communism is rubbish, Marx was a occultist and millions of deaths later here we are.
      "Russia has knuckle-dusters and lots nukes. We're trying to keep them on the knuckle-dusters" Excellent game 🙄

    • @skyrat3816
      @skyrat3816 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're not far off. It may have gotten colder when the soviet union collapsed. But it has gotten warmer each time Putin's russian air force tests the airspace around Britain and her neighbours'. No doubt there's a lot more we don't hear about and maybe these came very close to an aircraft being shot down. Which would really heat things up.

  • @jimcook1161
    @jimcook1161 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    32:15 Hi Connor! You're absolutely right there. Rocking the wings from side to side is way of saying I am unable to communicate. After acknowledging this the plane must follow the intercepting aircraft.

  • @laurenC91.
    @laurenC91. 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The word you are looking for is twinjet engines. They have two so that they can still land safely if one was to fail, they can also pick up and fly faster. My dad fixed panavia tornadoes before typhoons too over, he had been promoted beyond the hangers by then. Left after 27yrs of service, some squadrons he was at included Lossemouth and conningsby ❤

  • @rickhirons2409
    @rickhirons2409 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Did QRA at Coningsby on 29 Sqn Phantoms in the early ‘80’s. Regularly had to scramble to intercept Bears on the way to Cuba flying a tad too close to our airspace.

  • @JohnDuffy-bq8wg
    @JohnDuffy-bq8wg 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Had two typoons heading too a Russian intercept go supersonic over my house, even that was exhilarating, the whole house shook

  • @ClassicRiki
    @ClassicRiki 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    32:43 As far as whether they could make it to London before the Typhoons, it’s worth bearing in mind that while the Typhoon can get to London in 10 minutes…they have a rough top speed of somewhere in the 1,500mph area. Supersonic is much lower than that at the altitude they’re likely gonna be at, and a passenger jet is considerably slower of course

  • @Herr_Bishmeister
    @Herr_Bishmeister 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great to see a young cousin from across the pond responding to this. I got to see my old work place, for one, that being the bunker at High Wycombe, I had responsible for the security of that facility for a number of years. One year of which was during the event of 9/11 - that day was the 1% of focus and effect of years of preparedness. Made the hairs on the back of my neck stand !!!

  • @valeriedavidson2785
    @valeriedavidson2785 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    The Prime Minister has the last say in conflict.
    The King does not make final decisions.

    • @davesimpson5702
      @davesimpson5702 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Well He can but he chooses not to - its formally delegated to the PM (The Kings government)

    • @matthewjamison
      @matthewjamison 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      The King still can. He can desolve the government tomorrow if he chooses. The people just wouldn't go for it.

    • @davesimpson5702
      @davesimpson5702 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@matthewjamison Some might not but many might - depending on the circumstances....Life is never black and white like that.

    • @matthewjamison
      @matthewjamison 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davesimpson5702 indeed

    • @valeriedavidson2785
      @valeriedavidson2785 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@matthewjamison It would never happen. The King has no real power. The decision whether to go to war on not is taken by the Prime Minister.

  • @spacechannelfiver
    @spacechannelfiver 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Typhoons are at their best in the Intercept / Inderdiction role. They were built to get off the floor fast, they also have very good ears on them.

  • @martinscholes2023
    @martinscholes2023 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The Typhoon has 2 engines and was designed that way to give massive thrust to weight capability

    • @mrcaboosevg6089
      @mrcaboosevg6089 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Also protects it against the unlikely event of engine failure, flying with one engine wouldn't be ideal but it'd save the air frame

  • @alanelesstravelled8218
    @alanelesstravelled8218 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    The one circling round was probably from the skydiving club at Hibaldstow climbing to altitude.

    • @TonySpike
      @TonySpike 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its more likely to be Doncaster Airport

    • @moonramshaw1982
      @moonramshaw1982 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or the screen was buffering 😂

    • @alanelesstravelled8218
      @alanelesstravelled8218 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TonySpike Possibly, but aircraft flying in to Doncaster were never put in to a holding pattern, it was never that busy. Their normal approach to Doncaster was to fly straight over my house at 4000' and then turn left at Thorne. The long rectangular dark area to the north of the circling aircraft looks like Broughton and Twigmoor woods, so an aircraft from Hibaldstow climbing to altitude for a parachute drop seems more likely.

  • @vikkihumble2227
    @vikkihumble2227 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    questions are always good mush, question everything

  • @baylessnow
    @baylessnow 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Connor, if you were on board a highjacked jumbo jet with a full load of civilian passengers, these guys are prepared, under orders, to shoot it down! So yes, they would intercept an unidentified civilan plane.

  • @Enhancedlies
    @Enhancedlies 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    so the thing is we have Russian fighters, bombers and everything else not just trying, but coming to and into our airspace weekly sometimes at the heights. Its mad, but they are basically calling our bluff and if we don't respond... then it really could mean something serious following it - very tense

    • @dutchbachelor
      @dutchbachelor 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Not really. Yes, it's to be taken serious each and every time, but it's a chess game that has been played since the time of our grandfathers. In the air but also at sea, especially with submarines.
      And mind you, those aircraft are being tracked pretty much from the moment they take off. Before they get to the UK, they have to cross a lot of European airspace and they have probably been shadowed by friendly Air Forces all the way.

    • @Enhancedlies
      @Enhancedlies 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dutchbachelor yes but that doesn’t change the fact they are entering our airspace with weapons attached. It doesn’t mean they are coming to bomb us, of course. As you said it’s a chess game at the highest levels. But doesn’t change the fact they are being aggressive and pushing us.

  • @Ade2bee
    @Ade2bee 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Out of the initial batch and to get things up and running the two seater typhoons are training aircraft but can be used as full combat aircraft.
    The single seaters are normal typhoons

  • @Michael-yq2ut
    @Michael-yq2ut 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.
    Almost all of the military are trained to just react, thats why they are drilled so much, if you stop to think about it, you couldn't do it.

  • @alexfletcher5192
    @alexfletcher5192 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    For the benefit of Americans, where you might think is 100's, start thinking in tens of miles. That can be the margin. For instance, in a largely straight line (roads permitting) the nearest coastal location from my house in the UK is two hours and twenty-six minutes away. Yes, it's that small.

    • @B-A-L
      @B-A-L 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are never more than 78 miles from the coast in Britain.

    • @mainfish88
      @mainfish88 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I love how ur saying (without sayin) u live ages away from the coast to us in the uk but really nearby for u Americans

  • @edh8827
    @edh8827 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think the whole point of the QRA is that planes are in the air several minutes after the alert & can intercept very fast. I do know that planes have had to go supersonic but the bang triggers many calls so I hear they try to avoid this. The coast to London is short though.

  • @alexfletcher5192
    @alexfletcher5192 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Britain used to have a pretty astounding aerospace industry, with multiple manufacturers. The Dehaviland Comet - for example - was the world's first jet airliner. Yes, it crashed a lot, but it still counts...

    • @Ozymandi_as
      @Ozymandi_as 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      America used to have some great aircraft manufacturers as well ...

    • @geoffbentley8774
      @geoffbentley8774 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Until they found the problem.

  • @danielferguson3784
    @danielferguson3784 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Yes. Here in Britain the Prime Minister is the one who makes Presidential type decisions. Technically the King is Commander in Chief of all forces, civil & military in the UK, but the Government acts in his name. The PM is the King's chief Minister, so he has the responsibility, but possibly he will inform the King before taking final decisions, as he will also take expert advice. In an acute emergency it may not be possible to seek the permission of PM or King , & pilots or their commanders might have to act on their own initiative. The Typhoons can be over London in 10 minutes, so it's unlikely anything can reach London before them.
    The RAF or Government won't have to check for the plane with other Governments, because they will have been tracking it along with all other aircraft. They won't seek permission from foreign Governments to act, but defend the country as they need to. It's unlikely that a plane does not hear radio instructions, so they will respond if they are innocent.

    • @reluctantheist5224
      @reluctantheist5224 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Except in this case...

    • @stephenhumphrey7935
      @stephenhumphrey7935 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Permission of the King?? 😅😅
      The King might well be informed about the situation, but he doesn't have anything to do with the decision-making.

    • @reluctantheist5224
      @reluctantheist5224 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@stephenhumphrey7935 He has in effect already given his permission to the PM to do what is necessary in his name.

    • @overthewebb
      @overthewebb 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The King is Commander in Chief in a purely symbolic role. In no way is the King getting informed before any decision. He would be informed afterwards, as the King has Zero power. The Prime Minister's decision is final

    • @adegbolaarimoro1196
      @adegbolaarimoro1196 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The kings role (monarch) is largely ceremonial and doesn’t have direct powers in government.

  • @nicholaswatson3896
    @nicholaswatson3896 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We get a lot of Russian military planes flying very close to UK airspace. Quick response jets are scrambled to intercept any unidentified aircraft that enter or are close to entering UK airspace. Sometimes it might just be a commercial aircraft with a broken transponder/radio, but mostly it's the Russians testing our response times.

  • @nicksykes4575
    @nicksykes4575 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Hi Connor, planes with one jet pipe have one engine, planes with two jet pipes have two engines.

    • @_Professor_Oak
      @_Professor_Oak 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂😂

    • @papasierra115
      @papasierra115 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I think the word you are looking for is exhaust ;) Plus just to confuse the matter. There are very rare occurances where an aircraft has one engine and 2 exhausts or the other way round. But the rule of thumb number oif exhausts equals the number of engines.

    • @perk70
      @perk70 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@papasierra115Wrong....The word you are looking for is afterburners!

    • @dutchbachelor
      @dutchbachelor 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@perk70 Wrong. Not every jet engine has an afterburner.

    • @perk70
      @perk70 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dutchbachelor Afterburners are standard equipment on fighter planes and are used to help military aircraft reach supersonic speeds. Was we talking about R.A.F. fighter planes?

  • @elfri1738
    @elfri1738 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    29:39 Let’s say you’re flying a Boeing 747-8 at maximum speed, around 614 mph. It might take about 4.5 minutes to cross the UK’s airspace, but that doesn’t make the UK vulnerable-in fact, the opposite is true. The UK's air defense is among the most robust in the world. As the first country to develop radar technology, its systems are highly advanced and integrated with NATO allies.
    The UK's radar and surveillance network is so sophisticated that it detects aircraft long before they reach British airspace. There’s no need for external communication; the system is interconnected with the UK’s own defense infrastructure. Additionally, the UK's position among its neighboring countries creates a multilayered defense network, akin to the layers of an onion.
    This defense network includes satellites, ground-based radar, and AWACS (Airborne Warning and Control System) aircraft, which can track targets from hundreds of miles away. As soon as your aircraft is detected heading toward the UK, multiple defense layers are activated, and alerts are issued. If you were approaching from Germany or France with no communications, our systems would already flag your aircraft.
    By the time you enter UK airspace, Quick Reaction Alert (QRA) Typhoon jets would be launched within minutes. These jets, equipped with advanced AESA radar and IRST systems, would intercept you long before the 4.5-minute window you might think you have. The rapid response and layered defenses make breaching UK airspace extremely difficult.
    This seamless integration of early detection and rapid response ensures any potential threat is neutralized long before it reaches critical areas. This is why, if Russia were to consider an attack, submarines would be the more plausible option, given the challenge of avoiding detection underwater. As you approach London, rest assured that the skies are protected by an unyielding and vigilant defense network, ready to respond the moment a threat is detected.

  • @petersmith7126
    @petersmith7126 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Their job is to itercept Russian aircraft approaching UK airspace thats the primary role ..... Interception of a possible terrorist attack is a secondary factor

  • @knowledge-seeker-x7u
    @knowledge-seeker-x7u 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Nearer than you think. For example, the English Channel - the sea between France and UK - is only 23 Miles wide. A matter of minutes. Speed of thought, response, and travel needed beggers belief.

  • @randomwaffler
    @randomwaffler 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you have a radio or communications failure, pilots must squawk 7600 on their transponder to indicate that they have a radio failure. If so, the aircraft will try to be reached with Guard frequency (121.5), ACARS, satphone and even a light gun.
    The squawk code for hijacking/interference is 7500 and for a general emergency (MAYDAY, PAN PAN) it is 7700.

  • @johnparker1696
    @johnparker1696 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Another thing for your questions are that there are several things a plane can do to communicate with a Typhoon things like waggle the wings or even wave from the cabin windows or flash your nav lights and yes if a plane is covered in markings for Spanish or French airforces or even civil markings if it fails to respond to communications its a UFO

  • @stevenhartley1350
    @stevenhartley1350 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Russian Aircraft actually fly close fact gathering missions very often. In one year within to 2020’s stood at 18 flights in one year (within our actual sovereign airspace not our area of interest). Vladimir probably wanted to see if we were ready to shoot or he was gathering intelligence on our react as well as technical information too.
    We used to call it sabre rattling.

  • @TheRealMiniIsHere
    @TheRealMiniIsHere 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    People mock the UK for having a small army, navy fleet and air force but we kept control in the wars extending our lifelines thin as we could tactically which kept us safe enough. I am confident we can do the same even with the smaller numbers with help of our allies. R.A.F QRA will take an order to strike down a threat, even if the threat is registered to be an civilian aircraft to keep the population safe as their last resort of action.
    I live near a popular flightpath that the R.A.F uses so when the afghan war started I remember seeing formations flying over, a magical sight but it brought the situation to a real understanding. Respect to everyone who serves to protect the rest of us so we can live without fear, those men and women surrender their freedom and rights so we can keep ours. Without these people threats will be higher and heavier without a doubt.

  • @royhayward5828
    @royhayward5828 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    yes your wrong .... mostly they react to russians entering uk air space

    • @LoricSwift
      @LoricSwift 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It was an interesting insight in the cultural insulation of at least this one American. I guess from his perspective he hadn't heard anything about hostile Russian Air Intercepts, and so assumed it wasn't happening, and assumed it must be terrorism related instead. Which it could be, its just the vast majority (99%+) is intercepting military aircraft.

  • @SteveBagnall-gh1fu
    @SteveBagnall-gh1fu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Spitfire, took on the M
    Me109 fighters, as they had a speed advantage of 20mph.
    The Hurracain then shot down the bombers.
    A Me109, had approximately 3 minutes of flight time if over London as all airfields were usually 30 miles from that coast, behind Calais.

  • @Pjs-ge7gk
    @Pjs-ge7gk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Europe is a fortress, We spent millennia fighting one another now we're friends and will help defend this alliance we worked so god damned hard to create! God help any idiot who tries to undo that work. History has shown plenty, each of us have our strengths and each nation is as vital to the alliance as the next.

  • @streaky81
    @streaky81 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "this isn't the cold war any more" - oh, sweet innocent McJibbin. The question really this time is Russia's capability to target-deliver a warhead, but we're definitely in one. This was made back in the days when we were "friendly" with Russia, relatively. Some aircraft have two exhausts because they have two engines. Also the prime minister is the commander-in-chief in the UK, they're one and the same - it's a royal prerogative power that is given to the PM.

    • @Markus117d
      @Markus117d 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly, There was a brief time after the fall of the Soviet union where the cold war ended and there were friendly relations, Such as western and Russian naval vessels making port visits to eachothers lands ect.. But that gradually dwindled. And a new cold war started, One that has gradually been heating up for the last couple of decades or so..

  • @TheOrlandoTrustfull
    @TheOrlandoTrustfull 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Flying erratically to prove you're not a hostile threat 😂

  • @theart8039
    @theart8039 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I have to say that I like your channel, you're far more interested in our culture than that other "American reacts" dude who I won't name but I guess you know who I mean..you actually seem interested

    • @razor1uk610
      @razor1uk610 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @theart8093 ..those others ...mmm... Tyler Rumple &/or Tyler Wurze..? ..the latter of which seems the least willing or able to learn.

    • @theart8039
      @theart8039 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@razor1uk610 No not either of them ..I really don't want to name the dude in case it looks like I have a grudge and I really don't..I just think he's "up himself" a bit. He just hit 100k subs so all credit to him but he only really responds to Patrons and we're the same age just about and both at Uni..anyway I was just a bit peed off. His Patrons send him stuff, I did once it was silly of me..a nodding head Queen Elizabeth..dumb I know

  • @carrera2.7rs
    @carrera2.7rs 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    7:50 from my understanding that aircraft circling is probably doing equipment (flight instruments, radar) calibration not in holding pattern. There is no major airports near it's location where delays might occur due to traffic and aircraft typically fly in ovals rather than circles while waiting.

  • @jhdix6731
    @jhdix6731 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    20:00 The main reason for a two-engine fighter design is safety. If one engine is incapacitated, the other engine's thrust would still be enough to allow for a safe landing.

  • @jamielye2246
    @jamielye2246 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The UK looks after its own airspace. That what this video is about ! Plus the UK has the biggest airforce in Europe and problely do most of the intersepting for are nabours like the french, just like the UK had to save there ass from Germany in ww2 with are partners the USA. 😉, say thank you to them if your French

  • @rbohYSL
    @rbohYSL 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love that you look like your dressed to work in the control room with that colour top and hat :D
    Another great video mate, thank you.

  • @davedixon2068
    @davedixon2068 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes they are looking for ANY plane intruding into UK airspace, military or civilian, it is exactly the same as during the cold war.

  • @pierce9128
    @pierce9128 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Here in Ireland the RAF also provide this service to us because we don't have the capability to keep our air space secure.
    It's a sad sad point

  • @andywitham332
    @andywitham332 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In response to your question about if the pilots aren’t ignoring just unable to communicate, in training us pilots are told what to do if intercepted and unable to communicate via radio, we can squawk a code to say we have been intercepted, and look for cues given by the fighter jets to follow or turn etc

  • @KGardner01010
    @KGardner01010 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It has also been the same with the Russian Navy for decades as well, Connor . . . The North Sea (English Channel) is also one of the most heavily congested waters in the world, too. From container ships, to ferries, even hovercrafts previously, yachts, sailboats, fishing vessels, and so on . . . and the Russians would just sail up or down the channel North to South, or vice-versa without worrying about all of the other ships that were there either. And in that case, they also get shadowed by various NATO navies as and when they pass by the various countries own region of influence, too . . . They even began to go to the West Coast side of the UK as well, which led to ships needing to be stationed near enough to shadow them if they did that . . .

    • @geoffbentley8774
      @geoffbentley8774 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Russians usually send a submarine to get close to Faslane.

    • @KGardner01010
      @KGardner01010 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@geoffbentley8774 - Quite possibly, Geoff . . . not sure if it was a news thing now (Forces News?) or something like that, or not - But I do remember seeing a ship, possibly a RN frigate watching over a Russian warship somewhere off the West Coast . . .

  • @gethinpearce
    @gethinpearce 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’ve been inside the Battle of Britain bunker :) (it’s very tight and very cold!) I actually sat in the seat Churchill sat in too!

  • @Tyler-jayCorrick
    @Tyler-jayCorrick 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Royal Air force

  • @SuperEoin09
    @SuperEoin09 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nope, it’s all about the Russians flying into UK airspace.
    When the aircraft are SCRAMBLED they have to be airborne in under 2 minutes.
    An amazing thing to see when there are SCRAMBLED.
    A slight roll, hit the after burners, then vertical!!!! And airborne!!!
    Awesome.

  • @yorkshirefazer
    @yorkshirefazer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Never, in the field of human conflict, was so much owed by so many to so few."

  • @aldibag1
    @aldibag1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    32:02 Usually its universal signal to either put the landing gear down to show surrender or something along of those lings

  • @razor1uk610
    @razor1uk610 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @McJibbin. ..Connor, those are Jet Exhaust(s) or Exhaust Nozzle(s) or Afterburner(s)
    The number of which usually indicates the number of jet engines.

  • @lyncorsham
    @lyncorsham 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’ve had them over my house , so happy to see them. Live close to Southend airport, There help them to land to a closed airport. When out of English air space then European planes take over into there air space .

  • @memkiii
    @memkiii 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The "terrorist" prevention, identification & escort of unknown/incommunicative aircraft is a secondary job. Their main role is to defend the airspace of the UK. The Threat has mostly come from The Soviet Union, and Now the Russian Federation. They are constantly being tested by Russian bomber flights.

  • @Chris_GY1
    @Chris_GY1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is filmed at RAF Conigsby near Lincoln in Lincolnshire you can visit the Second World War display team The Battle of Britain Display Team which is signed posted. Recently one member of the team crashed and died not far from the airfield he was also a serving in The RAF Royal Air Force. The first crew member who talks was in The Red Arrows Display Team for the full time. Majority of bases are in Lincolnshire though one was shut for another use.

  • @AverageShad
    @AverageShad 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    19:50 Some jets have 1 engine (1 exhaust), others have 2 engines (2 exhausts)

  • @Carlinferno
    @Carlinferno 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There’s another program like this one but a bit more up to date it follows the training of some raf pilots and some is filmed in an raf base in Cyprus

  • @phoenix-xu9xj
    @phoenix-xu9xj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I live near that airbase and it’s interesting to hear different levels of pan activity. Always worrying when you know there’s been a scramble .

  • @baitcat
    @baitcat 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I worked in defence, the Navy like 2 jet engines because if they miss the runway on a ship they neet to get as much speed as they can so they dont fall into the sea. But 2 engines are obscenely expensive so not all aircraft are kitted out with 2

  • @helenab7390
    @helenab7390 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I really like you and your channel but wonder why you guess what it's about when you're watching a programme that will explain everything?

    • @lizvickers7156
      @lizvickers7156 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      This is the annoying thing about any American reacting on any video. They talk for about 3 or 4 minutes about what they think the video is about and I sit here and just shout just watch the blinking video and you will find out what it's about. It's very annoying and irritating.

  • @Badgersj
    @Badgersj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Churchill: "Never, in the field of human conflict, was so much owed by so many to so few"

  • @Twirlyhead
    @Twirlyhead 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    At 20:43 - the bit when the Typhoon starts lighting its own farts is cool.

  • @philipgardner7360
    @philipgardner7360 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They are the exhaust from Two jet engines..when the take off they use extra boost called afterburners to take off faster..

  • @Samuell8
    @Samuell8 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    'thrusters?...jets?..two of these things?'... subbed

  • @MostH8ted
    @MostH8ted 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    when a plane is seen in the rader they are in range to be caught up with in 5 mins by the RAF

  • @stuartfitch7093
    @stuartfitch7093 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Yes Connor they can make it in time and easily intercept because they have permission to go supersonic.
    I'm Lincolnshire born, bred and lived here all my life, I live not far from both Scampton and Coningsby and I've heard the sonic boom when they break the speed of sound.
    Like the video says, they can be over London in ten minutes because the Typhoon fighter jet is so much faster than a regular jet powered civilian passenger aircraft such as 747.

  • @Ade2bee
    @Ade2bee 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It depends on the design of the aircraft, the f-16 has one, there 15 and the typhoon have two is often thought better than one particularly with larger or middle range combat aircraft due to thrust without reheat, as well as failsafe

  • @orrbugger
    @orrbugger 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The USA have a few bases here in the UK.
    I often see F15 and F35 aircraft fly over my house on their way to the Mach loop for training

  • @TonySpike
    @TonySpike 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    7:45 ...naah mate, its just a Yorkshire Airlines flight out of Doncaster 😂
    We never like leaving Yorkshire so we just fly in circles (if you dont get the joke, just look up Hale and Pace)

    • @moonramshaw1982
      @moonramshaw1982 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ha Ha. Get them pints pulled in the cockpit 😂

  • @batonemo6096
    @batonemo6096 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The monarch (king) is the head of state. The UK armed forces answer to the throne, not the government. If the prime minister(head of the government) wants to declare war he has to ask to borrow the armed forces to do so. I dont know if the monarch has ever refused to, but it theoretically is possible.

  • @RWBHere
    @RWBHere 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    32:27 It's highly unlikely that all methods of communication will fail in an aircraft, unless it's about to fall out of the sky. In the rare case that it happens, very clear visual warnings and visual instructions are given to the unidentified aircraft. Only if the aircrew are incapacitated or being hijacked will they fail to respond, if they are a 'friendly' aircraft.

  • @BlizzardExtreme
    @BlizzardExtreme 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    18:20 the spitfire in the video sadly crashed a few months ago and the pilot passed away, last ever spitfire to have confirmed kills in battle of britain sadly nolonger exists. RIP to the pilot who lost his life who was based at RAF Coningsby and a active typhoon pilot. RIP Squadron Leader Mark Long.

  • @liamstrange4939
    @liamstrange4939 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I live about 13 miles from high Wycombe where that base is

  • @stevencharnock9271
    @stevencharnock9271 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Regular intercepts go on every week especially Russian Bear aircraft trying to penetrate UK area of interest. The job is to deter however if the Bear was to come into UK airspace they will have the option of being forced to land at an airstrip or being forced to land in pieces 😂 We often get the fighters turning before going supersonic so the bang is out at sea however on occasion they are cleared to go flat out to intercept

  • @michaelkimber6203
    @michaelkimber6203 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    P.s. the Eurofighter has twin EJ200 engines, therefore twin afterburners (producing around 27,000 lbf) 😱👌

    • @TexasRancher22
      @TexasRancher22 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      27,000 😂 the f35 single engine produces 43,000 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

    • @MrDaiki_
      @MrDaiki_ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TexasRancher22 And yet the Typhoon has a higher top speed, climbs faster, has more range, and has the same service ceiling. What's your point? They're completely different aircraft designed for completely different roles.

    • @TexasRancher22
      @TexasRancher22 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrDaiki_ and yet the British are constantly begging to buy our older jets. Cope some more bubba

    • @MrDaiki_
      @MrDaiki_ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @TexasRancher22 Cope? Please do a little research before you let your patriotism make you look a fool.
      You understand that British companies like BAE systems contributed a huge amount to the F35 development, like, almost 30%.... It's stated on the wiki page in the second sentance lmao. We literally have software AND hardware rights lmao. So it's not quite as red blooded as you might've hoped buddy.
      Also, I'm curious as to why you think we are after old US jets? Because as someone who literally fixes our jets, I can assure you, we don't 🤣

    • @MrDaiki_
      @MrDaiki_ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TexasRancher22 Careful, your patriotism is revealing your idiocy.
      Are you aware that as a tier 1 partner in the F35 program, the UK is responsible for around a quarter of the development of the jet? You understand we own software AND hardware rights for the F35 lmao. BAE systems is listed literally in the second sentence of the F35s wiki page. So the jet really isn't as red blooded as you might hope 'bubba'
      I don't know where you read that the UK wants old US aircraft, but as someone who literally fixes our jets, trust me... we don't.

  • @mountaingoat2340
    @mountaingoat2340 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @McJibbin - rear component of jet engine = exhaust. Two exhausts = two/twin engines, one only = single engine.

  • @nicksykes4575
    @nicksykes4575 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Flt Lt Jon's next job after this was in the Red Arrows, he was on the North American tour they did in 2019. All aircraft have a transponder that automatically identifies them to air traffic control, who can see if they deviate from their filed flight plan, if a plane was acting like you suggested, it would already be of interest to ATC, either because it was not transmitting and just headed in the general direction of London. but just outside British airspace, or if it was a hi-jacked plane, its transponder would show it was way off course, in either scenario alarm bells would be ringing long before they started heading directly for London, The Typhoons would probable be alongside them as soon as they entered British airspace.

  • @johnparker1696
    @johnparker1696 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Prime Minister is the head of state in GB but he is advised by what is called Heads of the 3 armed forces called the Admiral of the Fleet Royal Navy, Field marshal Army, and Air Marshal RAF. these people feed info in real time to the Defence secretary who then relays this info to the PM whan a desition is given by the Prime Minister as he is the Highest level.
    But it is necessary to understand that the Armed forces are all called Royal Army, Royal Airforce and Royal Navy as they are headed by the monarch that is at this time undertaken by King Charles III but the King doesn't have power in this way in Britain anymore and the chief decisions are taken by the Prime Minister

  • @piercem579
    @piercem579 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @McJibbin To answer your PM question,
    The King is the commander and chief of the Armed forces, and the King has a government which is run by ministers to run the country daily.
    The top dog minister is known as the Prime minister and is typically the elected leader of whichever political party that the people have voted into Power.
    After an election, the winning party's leader will meet with the king for permission to form a new government.
    If Russia were to try a swift attack, it would be up to the Prime minister to authorise the QRF to shoot down any real-time threats.
    (he would then naturally Brief the King informing him that his RAF had engaged in combat)
    That said,
    Only the King can declare War so the Prime minister must present a case to the King if there is ever a need to declare war.
    The Armed forces swear an Auth of allegiance to the Crown, not the UK government.

  • @mickbird2392
    @mickbird2392 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pull it together mate 'these things at the back of the plane😂'. Don't worry bud we all have those moments from time to time😊

  • @bence42
    @bence42 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Every or almost every European country has mostly similar quick response air defense crews.

    • @valeriedavidson2785
      @valeriedavidson2785 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      bence Which countries?

    • @bence42
      @bence42 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@valeriedavidson2785 Shitty little counrties like Hungary, which is my homeland, had this type air defense since we had MIG-29s and red star above us...

  • @Sinned749
    @Sinned749 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The prime minster has (Tesco advert plays) THE POWER
    It’s the same 24:04 😊

  • @charlesfrancis6894
    @charlesfrancis6894 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I remember a tv programme where a Vulcan nuclear bomber was interviewed where he said he would send his family to Scotland before take off also saying he knew it would be a one way trip because there would be no place to land back in the U.K. after a nuclear war.