Can the UK's Labour Party heal its internal divisions? | Inside Story
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ก.ย. 2022
- An Al Jazeera investigation has exposed accusations of dirty tricks and manipulation within the UK's opposition Labour Party.
A trove of internal documents, emails and social media messages show how unelected officials undermined former leader Jeremy Corbyn, and anyone who supported him.
Can Labour heal its internal divisions?
And with British politics in turmoil, could the allegations hurt the party's chances of returning to power?
Presenter: Imran Khan
Guests:
Alex Nunns - former speech writer for Jeremy Corbyn
John Curtice - Professor of Politics, University of Strathclyde
Jonathan Lis - Political commentator and deputy director, British Influence
Subscribe to our channel bit.ly/AJSubscribe
Follow us on Twitter / ajenglish
Find us on Facebook / aljazeera
Check our website: www.aljazeera.com/
Check out our Instagram page: / aljazeeraenglish
@AljazeeraEnglish
#Aljazeeraenglish
#News #LabourLeaks #LabourParty #JeremyCorbyn #UK #UnitedKingdom #party #Brtiain #England #Leaks #Emails #investigation #aljazeera #aljazeeranews #corbyn
Jeremy is better than the current leader, the British media hate him. He was a honest man
Legend of Britain 🇬🇧
Legend of Britain 🇬🇧 politics
Even the Guardian hated him, and I remember they deliberately mispresented and even slandered him on occasions. Has any other Labour leader faced such sustained hostility from the Guardian (before we even get to the various right wing outlets)? Not from what I remember. The Guardian supported Clegg more than Brown going into the 2010 election, but I don't think they were hostile to Brown (who had been the most powerful Chancellor in history and then PM for 13 years by that stage).
Honest, nice but a weak, ineffectual & indecisive leader
UK hs no independent MSM, AND the mass news is opinions of folks from other countries, who hate us, like australians, germans, who have their own countries at heart.
There’s nothing “far left” about social democracy. Corbyn wasn’t far left. None of his policies were any more radical than what you would find in any Scandinavian social democracy.
30 years ago yes!
@@AlexandraBryngelsson not really, almost no one went so mad on privatisation that we privatised water. its not like you have a choice of water company
Actually he is a democratic socialist so further left than a social democrat, so for example instead of bailing out capitalists during covid he would have bought out the companies for the workers and public which would have been amazing.
But obviously our neoliberal elite are SO TERRIFIED of it, that they spoiled their own party's chances. 😏
@@yellowgreen5229 Wouldn't it just! 🙂👍
I was suspended in 2015 for being pro corbin on a Labour website. Effectivley stopped from voting in the then leadership contest. I left the party, stopped paying my membership. I had been a member since i was 18. I am now 50! There was nothing democratic about what happened to me.
I'm an American and that's shocking to me to know you can be thrown out of a political party for things you say on a website. This could never happen in the USA.
@@gregmunn2945 Well parties need to have rules and guidelines, if you go against them then the parties have a right to kick you out if they so choose. @marc carters case however was completely unjustified and is proof how far Labour has shifted to the right.
Exactly. Well done you! 🙂👍
@@gregmunn2945 Is that so? Are you sure? I suppose you do have that First Amendment... Really we need a written constitution and bill of rights like in the US.
i'd be 100% certain you did more than be pro corbyn to get suspended.
I like how you claim Corbyn was unpopular with the public as we watch thousands of people singing his name. The bloke was a couple thousand votes from power despite his own party undermining him and every single newspaper posting negative stories 24/7.
And that's why starmer doesn't stand a chance without us.
And gave rise to the biggest political party in Western Europe.
Adam Mitchell
You are absolutely correct. And I voted Labour in the Dec 2019 election
@@fredatlas4396 so did I
Corbyn was unpopular but as part 1 of the documentary exposes, the Right could make up all kinds of hideous lies about Corbyn and those of us who supported and the media would repeat them verbatim without checking the veracity of the allegations. It's no wonder he became so unpopular, he was utterly demonised and I'll never stop being angry about it
Corbyn’s policies were not “far left”. Are you claiming the Nordic countries are “far left”? The manifesto contained many very popular policies
Far-left? Ridiculous analysis of clearly centre-left politics.
Any news media on T.V. costs a ton of money and the media elite are therefore out of touch with the concerns of common people. It's tough to understand everyday concerns of people living paycheck to paycheck when you're earning millions.
Corbyn is like Sanders in the U.S.
Starmer is an extremely toxic and dangerous character whose track record as DPP and Labour leader should be a serious concern to anyone in the UK and beyond.
And he's a tw@, too! 😄
Yet more popular as leader than Corbyn ever.
@@kb4903 He isn't popular due to anything he has done - there are only two parties to vote for and when one is as pathetic as the conservative is now, why wouldn't Keir be "popular"?
@@kb4903 He isn't popular at all. Labour is ahead of the torys. That's all.
The only problem with Corbyn was that he spoke up against the war crimes of the apartheid state run by the most monstrous subhumans on this planet. He was accused of anti semitism and ridiculed. Starmer sucked up to the same masters and became a "leader" when he's actually just a spineless puppet.
I agree entirely with Alex Nunns, the only one telling the truth here. Jeremy Corbyn had the support of the overwhelming majority of Labour Party members and the Unions, not something Starmer can ever claim. Starmer only won as the result of a LOW turnout, and only has the support of the PLP.
and my clp 😭
I was a member of labour during Sir Kiers leadership election, I like many other people didn't receive a ballot. Most of the people I know that we're going to vote for Vicky long Bailly were shadow excluded
@@peepshow090 Thank you for that. I never knew that, but always suspected that was what was happening. Believe me, Starmer is the very definition of EVIL, and I implore people in England NOT TO VOTE TORY, NOT TO VOTE LABOUR AS LONG AS STARMER IS LEADER AND NOT TO VOTE LIBDEM, BUT TO VOTE FOR SMALLER PARTIES FURTHER DOWN THE BALLOT PAPER. DO NOT EVEN VOTE GREEN, THEY ARE CAPITALISTS, WHICH MEANS THEY ARE POLITICAL FRAUDS. You will NEVER ACHIEVE THE REAL CHANGE THAT IS NEEDED BY VOTING FOR ANY OF THE ABOVE PARTIES. It is also the ONLY WAY TO TEACH THEM ALL A LESSON THEY WILL NEVER FORGET. Also remember who every single politician in all the parliaments around Britain swear an oath of allegiance to - it is to the CURRENT MONARCH, rather than to the PEOPLE, which is who they should be swearing an oath of allegiance to. - This is the reason why Jeremy Corbyn's attempts to become PM on behalf of the PEOPLE was treated as such a threat by both the Blairites and the British State, and he was completely sabotaged, which was and still is an absolute disgrace and why I am hoping that England gets to a position where there is a majority against the survival of the monarchy, because where you have a monarchy, you will never have democracy.
Exactly. 👍
@@peepshow090 Is that SO? 😲
Keith doesn't have to "unite the party" he's expelled everyone who doesn't agree with him.
He is chosen to be a bouncer to keep the country under Tory forever
Well said.
Starmlin the Snake. 🐍
An exclusive club of yes men.
The only problem with Corbyn was that he spoke up against the war crimes of the apartheid state run by the most monstrous subhumans on this planet. He was accused of anti semitism and ridiculed. Starmer sucked up to the same masters and became a "leader" when he's actually just a spineless puppet.
It should be criminal..what certain people within labour did to Jeremy. They should face reprocussions
I wish they could prosecute those trouble makers. The country is becoming increasingly unlawful. It’s run by crooks.
Well he did get absolutely crushed by an idiot like Boris Johnson. They needed him to go
The only problem with Corbyn was that he spoke up against the war crimes of the apartheid state run by the most monstrous subhumans on this planet. He was accused of anti semitism and ridiculed. Starmer sucked up to the same masters and became a "leader" when he's actually just a spineless puppet.
Only Corbyn meets the criteria to be a labour leader.
I would've loved to see Rebecca Long Bailey but the election defeat scared the left into picking a blairite.
Exactly. The rest are all Tories in sheep's clothing. 😏
@@gregmunn2945 me to but unfortunately I don’t think she was strong enough😢
Guys how many moral victories but general election defeats do you want to experience? Aren’t you mature enough to recognize a person who agrees with you on principle, but understands the necessity of compromise as the price to lead?
The only problem with Corbyn was that he spoke up against the war crimes of the apartheid state run by the most monstrous subhumans on this planet. He was accused of anti semitism and ridiculed. Starmer sucked up to the same masters and became a "leader" when he's actually just a spineless puppet.
Really Mr Curtice, the Party was never against Corbyn it was the Parliamentary Party that was. There is a huge difference and that in itself is a problem.
Me neither Dan I will never forgive what they did to Jeremy and the British public
Legend of Britain 🇬🇧 politics
I will never forgive JC for not only ignoring anti-semitism but actively promoting it.
@@naomimartin3291 evidence?????
@@naomimartin3291 Did you watch the Al Jazeera report? There's absolutely no evidence to support either of your charges about Corbyn's alleged antisemitism.
@@naomimartin3291Not true. I'd never come across any antisemitism in Labour until the week before the election. This was exclusively in groups on Facebook and there is no way of knowing whether these people were Labour members. It's pretty obvious when you're arguing with an 18-25 year old online. It's also pretty obvious when you're arguing with someone who gets all their information from conspiracy websites. These were nothing like the people that Labour members knew from their constituencies and they came out of nowhere and disappeared just as quickly. That's an internet problem that everyone needs to solve. How exactly do you think it was a problem that Jeremy Corbyn was supposed to tackle? This is no different from the issues around antivax, Qanon, trans-panics and whatever else comes next. This isn't a problem for one party or one leader. You seem to be saying that it's acceptable to sabotage an election when YOU don't want a particular leader, but everyone else should sit on their hands and accept a leader that they don't want?
Poor Britain! Just when it so desperately needs an alternative to Truss's insanity, to have a bunch of right-wing snakes in charge of the Labour Party is just sad. If I were Scottish or Northern Irish or Welsh, I'd be heading for the exits.
What happened to Jeremy was the same thing that happened to us all an injustice, in which will never get an apology for.
The only problem with Corbyn was that he spoke up against the war crimes of the apartheid state run by the most monstrous subhumans on this planet. He was accused of anti semitism and ridiculed. Starmer sucked up to the same masters and became a "leader" when he's actually just a spineless puppet.
Lis and Curtice seem to understand very little about the extent of the damage that Starmer has done. It's not something that previous supporters can 'move on' from, because it was so disgustingly wicked. Only people with no morals will see it as history, and many could never trust Starmer after his despicable behaviour.
I think Lis and Curtice understand that stuff, they just want us to submit.
I agree with you after watching documentary , damage Kieth and right wing labour
I couldn't either!
@@juancornetto3010 They can eff off!
yes, i'm sure you know better than john curtice, a literal professor of political science.
Stabbed in the back by his own party what a disgrace going nowhere with starmer look what we've got now I hope your happy
Thank you Alex for saying what many of us are thinking,you appear to be the only honest one there
These files are not even being mentioned in u.k. media. Why is that
We want JC back
Even in 2019 Corbyn had a higher percentage of the vote (32.1) than Miliband (30.4), Brown (29.0), Kinnock in his first run (30.8) and Foot (27.9). His vote in 2015 was the third highest Labour vote in 45 years. (I corrected the date of Corbyn's second election.}
But that 32 percent was not enough to gain majority... That means he failed as a leader... Labour only won with high margins when it had a centrist leader in Tony Blair...
@@malik250988 If being a centrist was key to winning, then Callaghan, Kinnock, Brown and Miliband would have won too. And why were Thatcher and Johnson elected, let alone a number of far right leaders in other countries? People chose leaders they think will do something for them. If all Labour has to offer is that Truss is a bad PM, she'll probably win the next election.
@@nickd4310 perfect comment, and don't forget that Brexit forced Corbyn into an impossible situation as England was pro leave and therefore to be remain would have meant losing the election badly. So Instead of focusing on domestic policy which is what Jeremy excels at he was forced into a no win Brexit debate. I'm convinced if Brexit wasn't an issue Corbyn could have won on his popular domestic agenda.
The 32.1% figure refers to 2019. In 2017 Jeremy Corbyn gained 40% of the UK vote.
In terms of the absolute vote, he obtained a similar number of ENGLISH votes to that of Tony Blair's landslide in 1997. Even in 2019 he obtained a similar number of English votes to Blair in his second best election, and more votes than Blair did in his worst, and of course far more than Brown or Miliband. I cite English votes in this paragraph, because Labour was virtually destroyed in Scotland before Corbyn became leader, and these were exceptionally difficult to retake given the strength of the SNP.
You mean 2019, and 2017 respectively. That's what I thought. 👍
I'm glad this is coming out. I cancelled my membership after the internal report was leaked.
They destroyed a great mans dream of a better world that’s the reason all this hardship British people are going through you get what you voted for 😊
It's frustrating and sad that people like this exist inside political movements to undermine people and leaders who will actually create lasting change that will lift people out of poverty. It makes me angry that people can do this and have no consequences for their selfish actions.
Maybe they'll get a terrible reincarnation..
The only problem with Corbyn was that he spoke up against the war crimes of the apartheid state run by the most monstrous subhumans on this planet. He was accused of anti semitism and ridiculed. Starmer sucked up to the same masters and became a "leader" when he's actually just a spineless puppet.
The hypocritical attitude of Labour towards Jeremy is there for everyone to see,is very shameful.they brought a poppet as so-called Stammer
The only problem with Corbyn was that he spoke up against the war crimes of the apartheid state run by the most monstrous subhumans on this planet. He was accused of anti semitism and ridiculed. Starmer sucked up to the same masters and became a "leader" when he's actually just a spineless puppet.
I agree, the Labour needs someone to topple the Tory.
No! And just at a time it's most needed. The PLP's treachery cannot be forgiven. Ever.
But what is being done against the people who was behind all of the false accusations against those who was innocent?
I think full angry mob vibes, but with tea & crumpets instead of torches and pitchforks
The Labour Left in & out of the Labour Party needs to establish a New Socialist Labour Party under the Leadership of Jeremy Corbyn
During those elections I meet people who stopped voting or never voted and organized them self and knocked doors in hundreds it was amazing. Spoke to an election worker and he said that in some areas attending increased with 80% and that the Labour Party got 90% of the votes.
Because Corbyn talked about real issues and how to improve people's daily lives. Not centrist garbage of how can we give more tax breaks to the rich but look cool on social issues to get votes.
The only problem with Corbyn was that he spoke up against the war crimes of the apartheid state run by the most monstrous subhumans on this planet. He was accused of anti semitism and ridiculed. Starmer sucked up to the same masters and became a "leader" when he's actually just a spineless puppet.
Corbyn is the best pm the UK never had
Tony benn
Good point
I am puzzled -- why BBC has not reported on this internal document leak?
Because they were involved in the Panorama hit job on JC and because the then government and the current government can threaten the BBC with fund withdrawals. The private news providers have no interest in pushing these new insights.
Naturally because the BBC were complicit. Their Panorama programme "Is Labour Anti-Semitic?" has been shown to have been based on lies and miss representation.
I think Jonathan Lis should take up a new career because journalism clearly isn't for him. Nothing more than an apologist for an authoritarian hard right party posing (with his help) as a progressive alternative
simplistic analysis from John Curtice!
What was the point of leaving the EU if you're going to allow a foreign apartheid state, to meddle in all your elections, politics, policies and political discourse?
And John Curtice, as a professor, should be more careful with his language. He talks about 'not having the confidence of his party' when he clearly means 'not having the confidence of his parliamentary party.' The two things are different and many in the main party would have liked to have seen the PLP changed.
Many would say Corbyn's biggest flaw ( I think it is a strength but it would be a flaw in this instance ) was that he was open and accepting. He didn't get rid of MPs who opposed him although he was open to local branches choosing new candidates. Starmer, on the other hand, has been something of a dictator in this respect.
Exactly the heart of the issue.
Same as bernie
No way Jose.
Sir Kier was responsible for the brexit debacle in 2019 not Corbyn
Who was leader of the party?
@@kb4903 yeah that would be Corbyn who should have put his toe up Sir Kier's arsehole after he announced the 2nd referendum with out agreement of the party
But that's sir Kier, friend of liars, crooks and racists
Enough is enough.
We need proportional representation.
so SNP for me then and with no guilt about it.
The truth will out.
That is exactly what happens in the US
In 2019 people wanted Brexit done, Corbyn was too much of a compromiser with the right of his party to run a strong pro brexit campaign. In 2023 we know Corbyn was right on just about everything, he may be much more popular, particularly if all the blairites and basically tories were purged from the party.
That would be nice! We should have done it to them. But Corbyn even if he wanted to couldn't do it on his own.
Lis and Curtis really just swallow the media perspective put out by those now in power, rather than being able to read between the lines.
"At the end of the day, we should just roll over and accept it regardless of what happened. We should just accept corruption as the normal situation as I have."
Its almost stalinist in its approach.
THE MERE FACT HE IS STILL EXCLUDED TELLS YOU NOTHING WILL CHANG
That is true! (It will be fun though when he absolutely TROUNCES the "Labour" candidate at the next election. 🙂
Alex is the best
The left will never forgive Starmer, he has to go
At this point the left need to leave and form a new party, Labour is poisoned.
As a leftist. I could either be on the left or be in Labour. Labour is dead to me now, after what they did to Mr Corbyn.
When Lis talks about the public passing judgement on Corbyn in 2019 he seems to completely overlook the fact that the biggest stumbling block was their policy on Brexit. I voted remain but I could see that any policy which didn't involve leaving the EU was going to go down badly with voters.
Who was it who pushed for the Labour Party policy at conference? It certainly wasn't Corbyn. I think we all know who it was.
I would have had more respect for Starmer had he stuck with that policy but he jettisoned it fairly early on so we all know why he pushed so hard for it.
I'm not voting so called "Labour "
Thanks for posting.
labour is a coalition of the centre and left , that coalition is not viable anymore, and our democracy is not fit for purpose , we need proportional reperesentation if labour refuses the left should vote green or abstain,, ironicly the torries have the same problem, they to will split given pr the right should be as keen as us and vote ukip
All the pain they caused people and the defaming of characters and these guys are like, it's old news, and no one will ever be punished. We live in a corrupt world.
Jeremy Corbyn is my favourite politician and he’s honest and kind and decent person and give me hope for a real change for uk 🇬🇧😊🤔😊😊😊😊😊🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈
Well said Adam
Wait, 98??
Is there any correspondence on the Katherine Gunn case?
Good guy, Alex Nunn.
The labour 'right' shouldn't be IN the labour party. Full stop!
Corbyn still terrifies the political establishment. He achieved all that he did while his own party, the other parties, and the entire British media were doing all they could to get rid of him. So much so that the LSE published an analysis of how severe the bias was against him across the board. No other main party leader has received such a relentless campaign of hate. In a fair political and media environment the truth of his message would have swept him to power. To all those that worked against him - you are responsible for the catastrophe of the Johnson & Truss governments, the excess deaths, the corrupt bailouts of wealthy individuals and energy providers. Own it.
He was not prime minister but he was best for Britain still his vice best for Britain legend of Britain politics respect him please
Absolutely true he was our Jeremy Corbyn
For this guy to say Starmer doesn’t need to address anything in these documents is absurd. He needs to apologize for casting his own aspersions on anti-semites in Labor and de facto tanking Corbyn’s chances. To paint Corbyn as too far left anyways and now Labor is more sellable misses the point actually, they arent competitive with a possible honest centrist Tory because Labor cant stand on its own principles. I dont know maybe there is a good point there that Labor needs to win but, beyond this return to Thatcher do we need another return Blair as well? Neoliberalism in Labor clothes? Starmer would need to define himself very differently to not evoke this image of recapitulation
One of the reasons I cancelled my Labour Party Membership.
No, just look at the statement Dan Fox’s wife and current labour MP Stella Creasly put out in response to these revelations
Blair Mandelson, Margaret Hodge and many more of the Blair followers were to blame.
They were gofers for the Neoliberal globalist oligarchs..except Hodge who is part of an Oligarch dynasty.
GG said JC lost 2017 by 3000 votes. Isn't that impossible.? Who owns the contract for counting the votes since brexit.? A tory donner.
Party members Triple.
Why are you not doing your job by exposing Starmers' blatant lies the level number of people members expelled?
I love an argument from Tony Benn, John Smith, George Galloway, John Pilger even Nigel Farage.
But Starmer is bought & paid for, weak & deliberately slow in deliberation & action.
Mr Corbyn has my Respect 💥
No. Because the Right-wing support Capitalism, while we on the left wish to replace capitalism.
More-over, the expulsion with no-hearing or -appeal rule 2019 change gives the Right an iron grip.
How can anyone who is left-wing ever vote for Labour after this exposè
Why don’t you number these ?
I'm an ordinary person and i do care for the internal fighting. Its a pain and i wish it weren't so but labour trying to out its left wing means it is ostracising its leftist voters, myself among them. disgrace the way the left were treated by labour, which when measured against the Tories, are the left leaning base. I'm still yet to decide who I'm voting for this season but I will be watching as many others are right now.
I hope labour can pull themselves together and acknowledge their mistakes, once that is done we can move forward together.
This is not yesterdays news as the leaders currently still have their own motives. You should be serving the people.
The constant fighting always comes from the right not the left.
The blatant bias is not being reported. Knowledge is power because of the lack of coverage of probably the biggest political Scandal in our political history
I suggest that the left of the party boycott Starmer.
I like Jeremy Corbyn but wasn't impress when I heard him talk at Tolpuddle around 2018
he didn't say anything particularly radical, to me it just sounded like rhetoric. A friend said that's good he's keeping his intentions under wraps. Nigel Farage, who I can't stand, for instance didn't play it safe he candidly said what he thought, and won the people over that way. Jeremy's speech was to my ears bland. The crowd cheered him but I wondered if they were being sincere?
I still won't vote Labour and i'm a member
Same. But I want to leave. It won’t accept my password or reset it lol
the Labourf Party are lacking a leader who truly reflects the need of the working people.I like you am incredibly sad but we need to fight for a leader who is prepared to suypport the workin people without feeling he has to embrasse not only the middle classes but also the media. Sad day for the Labour Party.
@@poppyfielding5349 agreed. Banning Naomi was the straw that broke the proverbial camels back
dishonest dan, fullo' bull
@@profhortsunlover1536 Hahaha how am I dishonest?... so you think I will vote for them? Good luck with that one then lol
"Boris should start a club with the others" brilliant 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Yes, I didn't quite understand that bit. Was Boris deposed by Israeli subversion too?
Why would an honest man like Corbyn club up with a crook like Johnson? 😏
the fact they never could stomach militant labour but kicked them out after losing to Maggy. the Bishops Stortford Conference . . . was the start of Militant Neo Liberalism aka the Tories.
🇵🇸
Long live Palestine
I can't agree with Jonathan at all
He must be a right leaning stammer supporter
JEREMY CORBYN needs to become Leader to once and for all make LABOUR a movement of the people
Piers gives him a lift....always late
I would give my vote to Corbyn over Torry boy starmer any day of the week
What a deliciously ironic comment at 17.48 “An elected leadership was sabotaged by its own, by its own side.” You mean like in 1980 onward when Benn and his cohorts constantly undermined Foote and Healey? 😂
Who said so
No mention of stamer and links with Israel
Like snow in summer and rain in harvest,
so also the fool will not be glorified.
🤔🔥
He's not in the Labour Party.
Who? Corbyn? He is in the Labour Party. He was suspended very briefly. He is not a Labour MP but he is a Labour member. I left because Starmer is a coward, a liar and a bully.
Look into Cobyn during his days with Bernie grant. Wood green .
the party is split! and I'll never vote for them as they are!
Given your expose' (The Labour Files) on the NEC's (and other high-ups) against ordinary members of the Labour Party, as well as potential supporters, which you said was a concerted campaign against Corbyn or anyone who thought he was any good, along with a high number of the public supporting Corbyn (especially the younger demographic), it does seem that this 'discussion' is fixated less on the findings and more on how 'bad' & 'unelectable' many claimed Corbyn was. Further, don't you find it odd that at the same time as this expose, that the Tories are practically going through a similar type of internal divisive coup? If BOTH parties are being subverted from within by those who do not like the views of the electorate nor members in either party, then maybe your focus should be to expand your investigation ASAP. Both Left & Right need to form alliances now to get rid of this permanent political class that is destroying people's right to chose their representatives, rather than having *hint* Klaus Schwab's minions (Blair, Brown & Starmer) be coronated de-facto rulers like Chancellor Hunt is right now!
Yes, split the Labour Party
The political 'scientist' (😂 ridiculous term) is really down on Corbyn, ending each statement by somehow playing down Corbyns popularity.
No it can't because there's no forgiveness and no loyalty to Jeremy or other MPs so this will affect Thier labourship no doubt
Opinion polls on bothe party's are going to drop
It’s never Corbyn or Johnson’s fault is it? Good riddance to both of them.
2/3rds of the panel decided not to speak to the issue presented, but gave a rundown of the current horse race. I will watch the series but Khan really should have picked better commenters (other than corbyns speech writer)
a lot of crying and excuses here