F-35/F-22 Killer? The Sukhoi SU-75 Checkmate
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ก.ย. 2024
- Fighter pilot reacts to the unveiling of Russia's newest fifth generation fighter: The SU-75 Checkmate. N.O. JUSTICE is now available: books2read.com...
#SU75
#CheckMate
#FatNatasha
Views presented are my own and do not represent the views of DoD or its Components.
"Twice the speed of light" well, pack it up boys. The Russians contacted alien engineers, we lose.
But you do.. just no one send you a memo.. 😂😂😂😘😘
Holy shit TWICE the speed of light. 🤣
At that speed, you'll return from the mission before you take off.
Fast as fuck boi meme
bad traduction
The announcer had more accents than the plane has air to air missiles.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
It's Werner Herzog's son.
And for the same price off the f35 you have 3 su75. That has 15 missles in total
@@Rusich945 f35 can carry six actually?? Plus it’s not the only 5th gen the US has though lol, the f-22 can carry 8 air to air
@@nickchapman5328 isn’t f22 better then the f35
the su 80 has photon torpedoes, warp engines, active cloaking and ion cannons.
just like the US aurora project or the tr3a black manta lol
Yeah, but the dylithium crystals have a tendency to crack.
The F 42069 has a permanent view of ur mom's house on the HUD
@@Marthyboy88 It comes with factory air in the tires AT NO EXTRA CHARGE!
so its a starfighter ?!?
🤣 reporters constantly embarrass themselves...twice the speed of light? What they perfected warp speed...
They've gone to plad..
"Everything is possible" Now they can perform the Picard Maneuver
they're living on star wars
They are pandering to Trump base, so for FoxNews the stupider, the better.
It's FOX , no surprises
Just announced: China working on a plane "based on" Russian designs. Will do _3_ times the speed of light.
With retail price of 99,95
capable of manipulating particles surrounding the aircraft to what it seem render earth's gravitation useless
I'm ashamed of this piece of shit, it's not even an airplane, but a PR of our self-proclaimed king
(Sorry for google translate)
So accurate and I can't stop laughing XD
Chinese Air Force pilots !!! Lolol lol
It can attack 6 targets with 5 missiles. I think it is as much impressive as twice speed of light.
It will kamikaze into the 6th target lol
After it kills 5 it forms up behind a 6th enemy, open comms, start calling him a noob, tbag him with the jet and shouting “davai cyka blyat”. That guy will kill himself soon enough
I mean it has the GSh for a reason…
The debris from disintegrating upon accelerating to light speed flies into the enemy engine intakes and acts like a bird strike. Highly effective.
5 missile in Stealth Config...So maybe more missile in standard config
"The new jet flies twice the speed of light"
*Special relativity has left the chat*
Gotta love reporters who know their subject matter.
shussh,it's a secret
@@soul0360 it's a female thing
@@F5Storm1 Meanwhile russians just flying across solar system having fun...
Sooo... this means that the russians somehow have belkan engineers?
If you "turn the chessboard" dont you end up checkmating yourself?
not if you are loosing
You can never checkmate your own king. Turning the board around during a game is just an act of an idiot.
@@bollewillem1 That whole intro was pretty cringe.
@@bollewillem1 If you turn the board and become the enemy you will (if you win) check mate yourself your genius. Jeez
Im sure they can hire a better translator than that, seems like they trying to say something
lmao "twice the speed of light"
i'm glad reporters have such stringent educational requirements to do their job
"We don't need to see, we vector you"
- russian pilot probably
Looooool
Could hear the russian accent while reading this
The whole darned thing looks like cgi - has it been built yet? Or, is it all "artists conceptualization?"
@@davidburroughs2244 gonna be ready to export by 2026, so no, it's under prototypes testing and already done with actualization.
Visibility can be augumented by sensors projecting on helmet mounted display to see through plane like in F-35, so it is not as much of an disaster like it once was, and as this thing looks like it do not have an internal gun, you will want to avoid dogfight anyway even with over the shoulder launchable missiles, which suits well undertrained armies that will be buying these things..
"Twice the speed of light."
Wow, that's pretty fast.
but can it do the kessel run in under 9 parsecs?
@@JinKee Depends. Are we referring to parsecs as a measure of distance like irl or a measure of time because we didn't do any research into what a parsec is? lol
@@QuantumAscension1 its a Star Wars reference sir.
@@skylur5910 Yeah, I know. That was the joke. George Lucas or whoever was responsible for putting that in the script clearly confused a parsec's distance for a measure of time, likely due to it's relation to light-years.
We got nothing to worry about, they will fly directly into a black hole all on their own.
There's no way they'll be able to remain stealthy while maintaining a stable warp bubble. Geordi LaForge couldn't even pull that off.
Geordi could easily pull that off as the cloaking device is 100 years old by his era and I have no doubt he could design and manufacture one. It's just that doing so would be illegal and Geordi is not one to brazenly violate international treaties. That's more of a Riker thing.
@@asdffdsa541 the answer is tachyon particles
@@asdffdsa541 Treaty of Algeron? La Forge has shit 'em...
On this new model they boosted the confinement Beam so it's stable.
Do you need to remain stealthy when going twice the speed of light?
14:16 Russian narrator: “…yesterday’s fantasies becoming today’s reality”.
14:20 Mover: “eh…you don’t know my fantasies…”
Encapsulating my response perfectly
They are talking about dictators, which even in case of the US allies currently cannot buy stealth jets, only updated 4th gen like F/A-18F Block III etc.
"our wet dreams are not the same" 🤣
@@ionorreastragicomicchannel didn't they buy F35?
In Russian: Ху- Е- плёт ( Hu-E-Plout )
“It’s got an APU” I laughed way too hard at that sarcasm
I got two APU's; AAA and 9 volt!
Thank you, come again 🙃
It's got fish AI
Ryzen?
I was thinking of that sketch, with the subtitles; "My friend; he has an APU...." "Why doesn't he have bloody subtitles!"
Hey C.W, really hope you read this. I'll start this off by clarifying that I'm I'm 18 year old studying AI, not a Pilot or an Aerospace engineer, I'm just a fan of planes so my opinion is probably not as valid as yours but here goes:
Everything about this plane points to a project aimed at export, particularly 3rd world and less wealthy countries looking to upgrade their fleet to gen 4.5/5 planes (many west African countries still operate the Mig 21, some Middle Eastern countries also use the Mig 29 ATM if I'm not mistaken). This would explain why the aircraft is unveiled in English, typically all Russian military products are unveiled in Russian (Su-57, Hypersonic missiles, S500 etc) when meant for primarily domestic use, however English would obviously be the language of choice when pitching a product to foreign countries.
The idea of this product being for export to less developed nations still making use of older fleets would also explain why the AI system and supersonic cruise features were pitched. Yes these are Standard for gen 4 fighters, however most of these nations would be operating gen 3 fighters meaning this would be a huge upgrade.
Finally, the design choices (the striking resemblance to the f 35 and x 32) are probably no accident. Obviously manufacturers will set their margins to incorporate the cost of R&D, by taking light 'inspiration' 🤣 from prior aircraft they probably saved themselves a heap load of hours in the windtunnel (I've done Wind Tunnel work and the amount of time and resources it takes is obscene, even for an amateur project) and modelling which could significantly bring the price of the project down considering the scale and effort needed to make a functional fighter jet.
Finally while low unit and operational costs are important for any aircraft, easy take offs and requiring less ground crew is especially important for 3rd World countries who might not only not have the funds to handle the operational costs, but also lack trained mechanics ready to maintain aircraft operational and mission ready. I know this first hand as a family friend is a general for the Malinese army who currently can't keep their entire fleet of just 8 Mig 21s (yes, 8 units of a 3rd gen fighter) operational as they simply can't find enough skilled mechanics to service the entire fleet.
No the features of this plane are not that impressive but I think it is important to consider who these will be sold to, as I said I'm not a massive plane expert but I'm guessing these will go for half or 2/3 the price of an f35 which will make them a good option for Eastern European and somewhat wealthier third world countries to arm themselves long term.
I'm at 11:38 in this video so maybe you point all of this out just wanted to put the idea out there just in case. As always keep up the great content and sorry for writing an essay in the comments lol
Hello. I am writing to you after 2 years. I'm from the Russian Federation. These aircraft were not planned to be used in the defense of the state. They really wanted to sell them. From the name of the aircraft it becomes clear to whom. The war disrupted plans. But you were right. I wish you peaceful skies above your head.
Cool DLC for ace combat 7
we can only wish, in the next ace combat maybe, not sure for the 7
It looks like something out of Electrosphere
but they already have the Shinden 2 wait, its slightly different, nevermind
Honestly, i rather have more original aircrafts or older prototypes.
@@azulaspencer It’s better though.
"twice the speed of light" didn't know the russians figured out how to make the millenium falcon!
Yes, russian aircraft very fast when fueled with vodka comrade! (Please read with voice of navigator Pavel Chekov from Star Trek for proper comedy effect)
Yeah didn't you watch firefox? @superi0r
i think they mean twice the speed of sound but i mean close enough i guess?
@@mintsamich its all relative.
Yeah, it makes the Vladivostok run in 12 parsecs...
You remind me of my dad he was a P51D Fighter Pilot in WW2. He was pretty much straight to the point no nonsense when talking about other planes exactly the same as you. It’s fascinating as never saw or met anyone else similar to my dads personality and humour similar to yours
I mean, it doesn't even have to go that fast. Even once the speed of light would be pretty good.
Even 1% of the speed of light will be mind blowing
Trouble with warp speed, I think, is you can easily miss planet earth and end up lost in space.
@@nerifterafrnam4682 "I don't even know what happened. One second he was there, next second he was 186,000 miles away!!"
Yeah but then they would complete their plans only at 100%. That is not enough...
@@nerifterafrnam4682 what heapens when u fly in speed of light and there is something in the way? Lets say u want to fly to mars an there is a metor between ? Would u hit it or go through it? I mean if u hit it than travelling far far away would never work right?
If there’s one thing the Russians like though, it’s designs that can maneuver at slow speeds
The design cant do so they added the trust vectoring which (and I could be wrong) wouldnt do a great job but better then nothing. However, I never figured out why RU uses 360 degree (or 3D) trust vectoring - there is no point and no pilot would like sideways Gs, better off banking and pulling up or do to do the same task with greater performance (since you would be using your flight surfaces). Its why the F22 180 degree "2.5D" trust vectoring was used as it is the better way & more comfortable to pull Gs & better performance. In practice I've only seen RU jets with TV use it in a 2.5D so they likely know its pointless to do 3D TV. Mover likely knows this topic better & if there is a real reason they have it 3D. No idea why RU releases these half baked plans or real planes and tries to claim theyre on the same level as US planes when they arnt close. They cant even afford to build they crappy (compared to the F22) 57s - no point having these if they dont have control of the air space. A good stealth bomber would be a better option since they wont have air supremacy fighters (the su57) if they want to bomb in our airspace. However, I think while RU pretends to be at the same military level as the US they know they have no chance against us and likely they know they stuff is meant more non-NATO countries as they have no chance against the US let alone NATO as a whole. My guess is there biggest threat is china who they might have a chance against and are actively avoiding them by pretending to be a friend to china.
@@JohnAdams-qc2ju Considering that the Fulcrums and Flankers its found on have wide set engines it may give the pilot better control if one engine fails. It also allows you to do intentional and completely recoverable flatspins. Not sure how the fancy crap is good in Aerial Combat though.
@@JohnAdams-qc2ju You could correct missing AOA at stall speeds through nose authority with 3d thrust vectoring. In these cases, it actually makes sense.
@@JohnAdams-qc2ju watch some of Growling Sidewinder’s videos with the su-57, especially against the f-22. While the f23 is slightly better, I wouldn’t call the su57 garbage. It can hold its oen
@@JohnAdams-qc2ju Why? Obviously, because RU are idiots and build planes just to show US the same level. They were so concerned about how to bomb in your airspace that they probably forgot to attach the nozzle firmly, so it turned into a 3D trust vector.
Sukhoi: "Its name is the Checkmate."
NATO: "Nice try. We already assigned it the reporting name Fartknocker."
Don't talk bad about the X-32/SU-75's intake, you're just jealous your jet won't smile at you! :D
lol
Lol smiling as it huts the ground
We did it first.
A precious smile that would never hurt a fly
Probably why the X-32 lost the JSF program, just couldn't bear the thought of having to kill
Except he flew Vipers so his jet smiled back (and Big Mouth Viper smile is prettier anyway).
Throwing this name for the Su-75 in the ring: “Hungry Helga”.
Mmmm, FOD
+1 for Hungry Helga
Was gonna say Fat Anya since it kinda looks like the F-35 but that works too
@@thearisen7301 totally.. tought the Fulcrum early versions had alternative intakes in the top for takeoffd from rought terrain to avoid FOD.. they might had something like that..
Imo they should of named it the Su-74 kinda like they had the Su-47. If you get the reference it's to the ak-47 and 74
@@s3viking214 (captain america): I understand that reference!
“This Aircraft is equipped with AI”
And just like that, every ace combat player got a bad feeling
Russian AF: "Can we have Fat Amy?"
Sukhoi: "We have Fat Amy at home"
...
Fat amy after puberty
Obese Olga
This sukhoi boss
Russia be like: I made thise plane to counter the plane you stop building 10 years ago. (su57)
America while testing 6 gen aircraft: cool...
Hahahahah
The voiceover sounds liked a jazzed-up auto-generated
I think it’s just a Russian guy doing an American movie accent lmao, props to him it doesn’t sound absolutely horrible
@@zilla2293 I mean he goes Irish for like 5 minutes tho
I'm 99% it's an auto-gen
It sounds a bit like Star Trek's George Takei. Oh my!
I thought the same thing, too. Mixed with Google Translate.
Compared to the size of intake on the F-16, is su-75 intake even big enough for the massive engine it prob has? Just in comparison, it looks really slim for hi-alt. flying. Needs to suck a lot of air. I'm just a regular guy, just my lonely opinion if anyone has a decent response.😁👍
“Can fly at twice the speed of light” Ha!!! 🤣😂😅🤪
Han Solo likes it.
They probably meant "sound" but technically it can't even go past Mach 2 🤣
Yeah, that was the best bit!
Do not mock onboard Russian super secret anti-gravity tech, western capitalist pigs!
It could work if you blink! At least the illusion will be there!
The thing that impressed me most, was the sheer amount of accents the announcer has.
I CANNOT place his accent. And it's fucking my brain.
@@pokerone6489 i can place it in the bin
@@zloychechen5150 it’s only rightful place.
@@pokerone6489 Sounds like a german guy that can’t decide if he wants to sound British or American
It's definitely a synthesized voice.
It looks a lot like the McDonnell Douglas JSF concept, save for the single inlet and larger wing surface.
"twice the speed of light" bruh
Spaghettification YES
Reporter may think that is not big deal because sound and light travels at same speed
@@MNanme1z4xs speed of sound = 343 m/s. Speed of light = 299,792,458 m/s. Not exactly "same speed" now is it
@@MNanme1z4xs hello sir is your brain working?
X32 is back for vengeance after losing that contract to Lockheed X-35.
Surprised they didn't try the big thermoplastic wing.
@@Reticuli Boeing was actually going to change the X-32 wing to more resemble what the X/F-35 had after winning the competition (had they actually won) because they couldn't get the wing molded in one piece without fractures/cracks. The model they built was fine for testing, but it wouldn't last too long.
Edit: Basically, if Boeing couldn't do it, and Lockheed didn't want to, chances are Sukhoi (if I'm spelling it correctly) wasn't going to with a much smaller development budget.
@@sleepyancient6655 I thought it was more because the navy changed their requirements last second?
@@randompheidoleminor3011 No, it wasn't because of that. The X-32 met all requirements performance-wise.
Edit: Don't get me wrong, the Navy did make changes, as you say, and there was an impact. But even before the changes, Boeing didn't have the process worked out to create such a large, one-piece wing, so I think the wings were destined to change no matter what. If anything, the Navy, by making those changes, helped out Boeing's reputation during the competition.
At least, that's how I see it based on what facts I have available to me.
@@sleepyancient6655 Boeing didn't actually try it very many times and were dealing with time constraints. The Russians have proven to be quite adept at materials and composite science, so it would have been neat to see them try it. Also, the original 32 had a bigger wing. Had sort of an interesting, promising look. Nice to see the pelican tail, though.
F22 was developed in the early 90s with an rcs of 0.0001 at age when the world hadn’t reached the level of advanced radar detection.This shows that the United States is decades ahead of any country in the skies.The Su 75 is not in the league of any US stealth fighters.
At an age not at age.
Twice the speed of light?!
That's really impressive considering the fastest manmade object is going 0.04% the speed of light.
Makes those hypersonic missiles seem slow.
That's what The Company wants you to think
Well that's just classic Fucks News for ya
we've made stuff go 99.9999991 the speed of light
@@Aaron-ru6ld Single atoms / atomic particles, sure
Them: “it can go twice the speed of light”
Also them: “it’s max speed is 1.8”
Them you mean fox news?
Once you get past the speed of light, everything is relative. It can be 1.8 or 6.7, makes no difference. You are everywhere at the same time.
It's hyperspeed rating, slower than Venator class star destroyer though.
F/a 18 ish Top End
Warp?
The Su-75 “Checkmate”
NATO Callsign: Femboy
I 2nd femboy over checkmate
It definitely goes 2X the speed of light. Have you ever seen one in the air? No. Because it goes too fast to see.
Twice the speed of light huh, thats pretty quick
Looks like Boeing gave up the goods on their XF-32 prototype from the JSF program competition. Things to note:
-Russia is usually a designer of twin engined fighters, this is the first one in a long while with a single motor.
-V-Stabs are a lot like the Su-57 Felon's, which are not very tall and I still feel is a possible hinderance to high AoA stability, and possibly a hindrance at extremely high speeds. Am unsure however because they are "all moving" surfaces, so they're move more surface than a simple ridder.
-It uses MATRESKA, an AI (it's algorithmic in nature, not true AI, come on now...) based logistics and system hard ware monitor platform. The F-35 has this. It originally had ALIS, it now has a far better variant known as ODIN.
-Mover mentioned the underslung intake and possible FOD concerns; respectfully Mover, the Russians have that shit figured out and have had so since the first Su-27. The Mig-29 itself has two sets of intakes, one for flight and one for ground. The ground intakes are located on the top side of the LERX. Sukhois employ metal grates that are lowered during taxi and take off/landing. The Russians know better. Their mind set is that in a battlefield, it would hardly be any cleaner.
-Aerodynamic Chines are not a direct mimic of US based developments; they're not used for just stealth; their primarily used as lift generators. I'm surprised to not find the aircraft's chines following more closely to the F-35s design. In fact, the nose becomes smooth, which signals fabrication limits with their composites.
-Lack of Canards and Elevons leads me to assume this will actually be less maneuverable than the F-35A. Shocking, as the Russians tend to favor those kinematics over US favored strengths. (after completing the video, noticed only an 8g limit. HMMMM, wow. Massive let down)
-Wing profile and chord is surprisingly thin. This aircraft might be faster than the F-35 over all. It looks built for speed, actually. The Intake is ugly, but unlike the nasty ass Guppy from Boeing (the X-32), the intake is much further away from the shock producing nose cone; so at super sonic speeds, this thing will work fine approaching Mach 2 just like the F-16 does.
-Wing profile does show that despite the large delta size, it doesn't have a very thick aero foil at the root, nor does it have a high incidence near the root. The F-35s wings are stubby but the reason it's able to carry as much JP-5 as the mass of an entire F-16 is because of those types of features, vortex generators and lifting body method. This aircraft doesn't seem to use too much of that.
- Mover is perplexed with the AI, but I can tell you that the AI feature that the presentation brags about is likely the competitor with the F-35s own AI. The F-35 actually has an onboard flight and mission AI, so the Aircraft can actually fly itself, even in combat roles. The F-35 is designed to have a Pilot quarter back a flight of 12 F-35s that are flown in a "drone" mode. The AI development has actually gotten that good over the years and it's no surprise that 15 years later, Russia develops their own.
-They mention vector thrust... I laughed.
-The ejector nozzle is CLEARLY mimicking the F-35s F135 nozzle, not sure how vector thrust is supposed to be integrated into that. The interior pedals of the nozzle are bronze instead of a snowy white, suggesting either a mockup or that Russia cannot produce the nano-scale ceramic coatings like we can in the US.
-The nozzle is oddly discolored and splotchy. Real nozzles like that of the F-35s are completely solid and a dark titanium grey... because they're infact made of titanium which is known for it's deep, dark silver colors that uniform.
- It states that the internal fuel load is 7400 kg. That's roughly 16,400 lbs. The F-35 holds 20,000 lbs internally, which is slightly heavier than the empty weight of an entire F-16...
- It also states that the top speed is an expected 1.8 mach, confirming that I think it does fine on speed. It's limiting factor is probably the motor itself along with a more restrictive drag coefficient compared to previous designs.
- The Chines on the cheeks stop at the radome; letting the nose cone becoming smooth and cylindrical... odd
- The aircraft surprisingly has static discharge wicks on both the wings and the V-stabs. The F-35 doesn't.
- The aircraft can only hold 5 standard A2A missiles internally. The F-35 can hold 6 and with the new missile design afoot, it could actually hold more.
- The Checkmate literally has to sacrifice a missile slot or two internally to install an onboard cannon, big fail. That means sighting that cannon is going to be a bitch. I'm reminded of the issues that both the F-4 and F-16 had when dealing with underslung gun pods. Both applications were subpar compared to a purpose built standard gun built into the airframe.
-The model shown has no visible signs of anything remotely challenging the EOTS, even though their "Optical Electrical Intelligence" system is clearly a market jab at "look we have an EOTS too!". All I see is the typical Sukhoi IRST pod on the forward canopy. The F-35s EOTS is MASSIVE and it's capabilities are RIDICULIOUS. It can actually see you through a window and pick out your rank, from 50 miles out. This was tested when a flight tried this by targeting a volunteer in a Vegas Hotel from 50 miles out.
- Checkmate also shows known visible signs of a DAS, although multispectrum sensor suites are not always readily visible. The F-35 and F-22 both have sensors and antennas hidden everywhere, on leading edges, wing tips, chines, ect. However there's no sign of any optical pods besides the IRST on the cockpit.
With that said, I predict this aircraft will be faster than the F-35, probably fly a bit farther as well (depending on Russian engine tech) and it will handle much like any other delta would; great instantaneous turn rates for snapping the nose around but it will bleed energy like no tomorrow and be utterly incapable of keeping up with Sustained Turn Rates. This plane is not going to see 30 degrees a second Sustained. So this isn't really a good aircraft for ACM unless they succeed and give this aircraft a good 45,000 lbs of thrust motor to compensate for that energy bleed. There's no canards so I don't believe it's high AoA ability will be that impressive, even with the wide V-Tail configuration being considered.
Major take aways are that this aircraft here is clearly a model or a half static test, half mockup hybrid. I've seen high res closed ups of the aircraft at this MAKS airshow and the rivets are visible, the skin has very chaotic surface profiles, panels fail to mate flawlessly like they do an the F-22 and F-35 and beyond that, the Rivet Patterns themselves are simply NOT CONDUCIVE of ACTUAL engineering (seriously, the rivet bolt patterns have no rigard for the chevron shaping of the panels and that's a major no no). The Rivets may actually be an artistic addon, who knows. The Su-57 has exposed rivets as well. The F-35 and 22 use rivets too, but they're well under the coating and the tolerances that we adhere too when putting in bolts and rivets are EXTREMELY TIGHT, leading to very smooth surfaces.
Beyond that, I also predict that Russia simply cannot compete in the Composites field. The USA has been using composites in it's combat aircraft for 45 years; the F-16 isn't just aluminum and titanium. The F-35 is a carbon fiber monster, making it actually have a low mass despite it bulky nature. How you make those composites and what you put into those layers plays a HUGE ROLE in the strength of the composite structure AS WELL AS the Stealth Properties. The lack of a Chine all the way up the Radome and the evidence of Static Discharge Wicks on the wings and V-stabs on the Su-75 indicate to me that the Russians have neither the tolerances, or the correct recipes on how to make good stealth capable composite structures. Even the chines on the Su-75 are notably more blunt and rounded that the F-35s, compare them for yourself via google.
As a result, the stealth properties of this airplane are in serious question. Much like the Su-57, I doubt it's stealth will be near as good as the American counterparts, but we cannot possibly know for sure due to stealth being a material science. Stealth isn't just geometry, it's also what an article is made out of and painted with...
I think for a unit projected price of 30 million USD equivalent, the fighter is probably adequately priced. It might be snatched up by adversaries like Iran or even NK, countries that know the Chinese would be too controlling over the product and thus something of a risk.
What's sad here is that this airplane was seen years ago and actually may belong to Mikoyan. It looks to be a descendent of the MiG-41 project, interlaced with a bit of MiG-37 (concept wise). The largest take away is that we need to really look at Boeing and ask them WTF did they do because the Su-57 has slight hints of the Boeing X-32, but this Su-75? Yeah... it's a Russian X-32 for sure.
Seriously. From the Intake style, the delta, V-Tail and even the Cockpit Canopy.
We really need to be asking Boeing some questions lol
I like this new series "Mover ruins aircraft". Thanks again for all your videos!
he has even inpsired a FOX reporter to do it for him! ;)
Wouldn't say he ruined the aircraft but he brought up allot of the fluff they were touting in the video.
Einstein "Thou shall not travel faster than the speed of light."
Putin "Hold my vodka!"
Hold my SputnikV
More actual in 2021😂
Don’t woosh me, but he said you can’t accelerate a object with mass to speed of light.
Ftl probably exists, but we can’t use it
Gotta give them credit for not settling when they hit light speed.
Ludicrous speed, GO!
I snorted energy drink when he said, "That's what she said." 😆
Liquid Cocaine
I had to replay it to make sure I heard it right. Maybe she meant twice the speed of love.
2:08 is the time stamp for those who are asking which part Mover said that xD
I was waiting for the, "You must in think Russian" moment from Firefox with regard to the "A.I." but I guess the Russians never saw it...
This would be a massive threat to the US Military.. if it was 2002…..
"You don't know my fantasies" thank God I wasn't mid drink for that one lmfao!
"We dont need to see, we vector you" lmao
A front hinged canopy wouldn't be "copied from the F-35"; early MiG-21s had them, so if anything Lockheed Martin copied Mikoyan Gurevich. These arguments are just childish. Sukhoi are past masters at building rough field capability into their jets - the early Flankers had screens and auxiliary inlets for just this reason, and many Soviet era jets had mudguards on the nose gear. TVC has been standard on Russian fighters for many years, which is something that was long since abandoned by the West as a really bad idea. The fuselage chines will act as LERX. "Most jets" certainly cannot super cruise, and I very much doubt the Checkmate will be able to any more than the F-35. As for your canopy comments, they're absurd: have you never seen a Flanker or a Felon? In any case, in the era of DAS it's a moot point. The gun is slated to fit in the weapon bay, much like the F-111's did. The truth is that Checkmate (if it ever sees the light of day since this was a mock up) certainly will not meet the Russian's claims. $20-30 million (as claimed) is complete fantasy. It may well sell on the export market as a Fulcrum replacement, though, and we can expect to see it in UAEAF service, given that they've been paying for its development.
I reckon the “AI” just means they’re using machine learning algorithms instead of preprogrammed data to control things like countermeasures and missile tracking. Still an improvement, but I doubt it’s anything truly revolutionary because why would it need to be?
ML is only as good as the coders working on it.
right, prolly just added neural net and shared networking to keep building the systems with real world data instead of as you said preprograming situations. may be kinda cool tho I would not doubt if the f 35 already does it. there are some things that U.S. jets don't boast about and "try" and keep secret.
No, it's touted as advanced autopilot that can react to changing conditions while offloading the pilot to perform other tasks. It's a tall ask from russian microchip/SW industry, but not impossible.
I'm guessing their "AI" means a bunch of nested "if" statements.
@@kewkabe and one big Else
Mover, you know as well as I do.
If she’s a screamer, she’s a keeper.
Aye!, love the content. cant wait to see this hit an ArmA mod so we can see the Fat Sisters fight
I predicted the need for such a plane 15 years ago. A lot of countries need cheap simple fighter planes like MiG-21 used to be.
How do you avoid planes being nothing then practice to more expensive planes (such as F-35/22) while still being cheap?
Low observability and speed.
Reducing RCS into low "range" is inexpensive and provides satisfactory reduce in detection ranges, modern engine + long sleek design enables supercruising and high top speed.
These planes are certainly not F-35/F-22 killers, but they are much harder to intercept then 4th gen fighters (ECM not taken into account).
Finally someone get on point. Yes, this su75 ONLY for export! We don't need scooters with one engine! You fk around with F35, but this is still one engine plane. If engine is down, you fk big time. Suhoi still need money for future development, this SU75 is for external use, not for mather Russia😂😂
@@hrjdjddjefhurjfhid8032If 1 engine is unreasonable then why almost every aircraft manufacturers makes a light fighter with only 1 engine?
F-35A,C for example.
"the boundaries between countries and continents are blurred"
Maybe they should not be flying if their vision is that bad...
It's just a polite term for chipping away at their neighbor's borders, like they did to Ukraine.
I mean, if you're flying with a $50 Garmin GPS held up by rubber bands and stray into countries like Turkey...
@@zengamer321 This is what I came here for!
@@zengamer321
twice the speed of light, can't wait to watch him accelerate on the deck and....piuu. oh look, a short glow and he's gone forever.
Nothing like disintegrating the whole aircraft before you get into the air.
So twice the speed of light means you can circle the globe about 15 times a second. That would be A LOT of Gs
@@BullittGT40 only up to 8Gs according to the presentation!
Looks like the Russians are going space truckin then. Cue up the Deep Purple.
If that thing accelerated to twice the speed of light, the entire planet would cease to exist
So, 2 things:
1) they mentioned "high mountain airfields"...does that automatically mean "austere"? Or do we want to question its ability to get off the ground in thin, cold air?
2) where are the elevators? Are the vertical stabs supposed to double as elevators, or are they using elevons?
“Twice the speed of light…” media at its best once again!!
what, I thought it said the speed of flight (like meaning a normal fighter), holy lmao
I almost died laughing hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha wtf 😂😂😂
someone should inform Einstein
"Albert Einstein is gonna be pissed"
"We dont see, we vector you" - Mover
Wow, it can reach Alpha Centauri in just 2 and a half years
Also they say every Su-75 will have a hardbass machine in its cockpit and will be able to broadcast hardbass to nearby enemy aircraft and SAM batteries, significantly lowering their morale
When they mentioned AI, first thing that came to mind was Firefox.
You have to think in Russian.
Same thought came to mind and this is pure propaganda...
Let's recruit Clint Eastwood to go steal it.
The Apache E has AI and the Apache has had a direct to TH-cam button since the Apache D.
@@squarewave808 But also speak out loud in English so the audience knows what the hell is going on.
I support naming it the SU-75 "Femboy"
I second this
I fourth this
I fully support the name femboy but here me out 'FLOUNDER CHICKEN' Whaddya think?
bruh cringe
Roger
1998, the RAH-66 Comanche integrated cockpit warning system: *ding ding ding* “missile incoming, 3’o clock, 600meters!”
2021, Su-75 Checkmate integrated cockpit warning system: *bwoop bwoop* “PULL. UP!”
Looking at the whole PR campaign that came with this reveal, including a youtube trailer, they are trying hard to push this plane for export. But considering the difficulty that they are having getting their SU-57 into production and operation, I dunno how many of those promises they talked about in the reveal will actually be fulfilled.
Just like the PAK-FA.
@@peterderuiter2937 the su 57 was born from the pak fa. Every modern day jet with new technology has had teething troubles. No country has had the perfect fighter program without problems.
standard Rusian problem, great design but impossible to manufacture reliably
@@LIKWID it was born from the PAK-FA, but the PAK-Fa just barely existed. It was marketed to great extend, but as far as i know just a few still fly and if i remember correct only Vietnam bought a couple. dont know if they are delivered yet
This is part of keeping the Su-57 in production as they will both use the same engine.
Before the internet and especially before my service time, I always wanted to know what our US Pilots ever thought of foreign aircraft, namely fighters. Now I know! I'm retired but still cool to see you do these videos. I still believe never underestimate your opponent, but it's good to know what is what at the same time. The Human brain is STILL the fastest processor so all the electronics still don't make me feel cozy. I laughed at the it can take on how many targets at once? The F-14D took on 14 last I checked. Anyways great video will be awaiting the next! BZ Sir -ABE2 (AW) Ret.
but this is a light/cheap fughter, it doesn't need to engage so many targets, the Su-35/57 should take care of that.
@@dezertfox3681
The Russian winter won WWII for them?¿
Dark helmet chuckles and waves when he sails past at 'Ludicrous speed'!
4:15 the supercomputer part is for the stealth aspect. Before we had supercomputers, stealth had to look like the F-117, because RCS was basically calculated by hand.
F-117 was designed with the computational abilities of the time
Not by hand. All the math was known and out into computers. But the computers back then could not do more than maybe a hundred polygons. It is exactly why the F117 looks the way it does. No more computational power available in the early 80s.
vector graphic primitive CAD
First fighter that exceed warp speed, great achievement in human history : )
Warp speed is not light speed. Light speed is slow at long ranges such as between stars. If warp was light speed, Captain Kirk's 5 year mission would be to go to Alpha Centauri and back.
@@orlock20 Oops, average speed of warp is not equal to warp factor itself, my bad
So they're building a "new" plane when their current gen 5 plane has 6-8 prototypes and NO planes that are even in actual use. LOL
The effort they put into making it all about chess was just too much.
They did it to tell U.S. that they stole our F35 plans and made something better and then said Checkmate to rub it in our face. But we know they can't make it as well because they are too broke to buy or remake things the correct way, and just like the Chinese, they have cheap azz parts and engines that can't compete. But they do make nice looking knockoffs! Bravo.
yess ikr, some boomer in sukhoi with his part-time uni student assistant thought it was really marketable and hip and cool, at least i get that wibe
@@maniacdad42 I was referring to all the cringey chess references in the PR spiel before they turned on the lights. Today, it's the US who wants to copy Soviet technology, paying Russian aerospace company Yakolev for design details on the Yak-141 to help them develop the F-35. Or how the Soviets built a better Space Shuttle that only superficially looked similar, and was capable of working autonomously with heavier payloads, successfully doing so on its test flights.
@@vincere_ oh, my bad.😅 But still sickening that we even have to use or get help from their tech and equipment which we could be ahead of them on. But thanks to Obummer for shutting down our space program and throwing us behind by 10 or more years.
@@maniacdad42 Obama shutting Bush's moon program really seems like it was done out of spite or just so he could look like he was doing something 'special', in hindsight. The US is still going back to the moon, again, and now it's making up for lost time and development that could have been accomplished in the 2008 - 2016 period.
I used to be a sukhoi fanboy, until I realized there’s legitimate questions if they can even produce a plane. The SU-47/SU-37 were supposed to be raptor killers, they were scrapped. The SU-57 has 1 operational jet, despite being behind 20+ years in 5th gen tech (raptor developed in the 80’s). Checkmate still hasn’t flown and a majority of the air force are repurposed SU-27’s that the US would have in a museum at this point. I understand SU makes great looking planes, but they don’t make them. That’s the point lol
Not to nitpick fanboy but - SU-47 was a testbed with forward swept-wing design, mainly due to low speed advantage it offered for Carrier ops. Russians did however test other technologies that later were implemented on Su-35/57.
The f-35 also took nearly 20 years in development, russia just started later and its ready for production, they already ordered 76 of them
You sure aren't a sukhoi fanboy. There aren't many 27s left. Most planes are pretty modern 30sm.
The Russian S-400/S-500 missile systems (the US is so far behind in missile tech, so it's even) and networks render the US' aircraft pointless anyway.
The f22 enrolled service way later in 2005. Its newest tech.
Hello Mover, not only F.O.D. would be a problem, but as I noted on another site, the intake is so small that at high A.O.A, the engine will stall. What's your opinion?
Must be the Russian Enterprise with that doubling the speed of light.
Explains all the UAP sightings tho🤣🤣🤣
How do they know it’s got cheap operating costs when they haven’t even flight tested it?
I mean, it could have gone through testing before they revealed it.
Well I imagine they are just running of estimates. But the russians do have experience when it comes to operating fighter aitcraft, so I guess they do no to some extent what they are talking about
You can estimate based on known data. You can estimate ahead of time how long a part will work until it will need replacement, and for refurbishments you can use similar equipment that exists on current aircraft.
Nevermind I watched the video
Not flying at all: The lowest your operating cost will ever be. Duh.
Here's a bit of trivia I don't know if it's coincidental or Russia is trying to tell us something:
Why did they name it SU-57 - why the number 57?
Because if you add 35 + 22 (for F-35 & F-22), you get 57.
Message: my Su-57 could defeat both of your Frontline fighters.
Why the number 75 (in SU-75?)
75 is the reverse of 57.
Message: my 75 is a reflection of my 57, which together will put you in "Checkmate!"
Intake: There was a divertless intake tested on the F-16 that looked similar.
Looking at the design, in mid-to high alpha there appears to be nothing for lateral stability except the thrust vector option with that empty belly. Seems like the wings would mask the effectiveness of the elevons. F-16s have ventral fins, F-15,-18,35 all have elevons that drop below the wings in high AOA. High-AOA with wing stations (assuming it has any) would seem to require a minimum thrust from the engine to remain stable ... low-speed landing might suffer a bit.
This aircraft is what I imagine I’d get in the mail if I ordered an F-35 from Wish.
Its a better cheaper F35, even the US military has said the F35 is a failure. The SU75 is its supposed successor. Get your facts straight
My comment was referencing the aircrafts looks to that of the F-35. IMO, the F-35 looks better. I never said anything about this aircraft’s supposed performance capabilities.
@@topbanana.2627 ok that’s exactly what the Americans said…. Deluded 😂🤣😂🤣
@@topbanana.2627 Yeah, its amazing... look at the dozens of countries ordering the "SU75"... oh wait.
@@scottiramage317 get your facts right. Go read the articles.
How radar absorbent is plywood?
A hype video is one thing but flight testing is quite another.
I like how they made maintenance cost and efficiency claims about ten different times, but no physical plane exists yet. I know they're in salesman mode, but any air force procurer worth a damn knows they're pissing on their leg and telling them it's raining.
They got rid of the small rear wings and pushed the twin fins further back; took the X32 intake making it streamlined and aesthetically pleasing. There seem to be two smaller paddles projecting on either side of the nozzle - they could act as vectors? Some nice design/features - another slick and good looking bird.
They did not take anything from anyone. These are solution that are available to be used depending on what you want.
The tail is reminiscent of the YF-23 from the original stealth fighter program that lost out to the F-22
It's slick but as with all modern jets it's extremely boring looking.
@@thedigitalrealm7155 I believe the Yakolevs had a similar tail design.
@@cassu6 well jets are meant to kill not please someone's eyes.
Make a Comparison of x32 and x35 and why x35 was choosen and does Su 75 has covered the negative points of x32 to become a worthy competition to f35
I wonder if it can make the Kessel Run in under 12 parsecs😂
You know that a parsec is a measure of lenght, not time, right?
@@Belgianbanshee Shut up Meg!
@@praetorxian - HAW!!
Only if Harrison Ford is at the controls....
It needs a better hyperdrive😃
TWICE THE SPEED OF LIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!! Alpha centauri here we come
Will still take 2 years to get there, even at cx2!
@@hywodnsu pessimist
Russians are already there, sukha.
"It's the Russian F35 but 10 years late to the party." F35 awkwardly slinks in 10 years late for its own party....
Spat my coffee out laughing over twice the speed of light
Wait if they have the tech to make something go "twice the speed of light" why are they bothering with a airplane. Connect that to a big projectile and launch it at that speed when it hits it is more powerful than any weapon man ever used.
Welp, there goes the planet.
@@____Wolf Hey I'm not the one who created the twice of speed of light engine. Blame China.
I'm addicted to you videos. My brother worked in arinotics in the Navy. Much respect
>These games are played, like Ace Combat.
"Speed, the boundaries between countries and continents are blurred"
Holy shit that was on point
What have borders ever given us??!
@@DeltafangEX «a reason to fight»
Belka did nothing wrong
Not to mention trenches!
@@DeltafangEX books? The birth of Amazon ?=P
@C.W. Lemoine I have a question for you; If everyone has stealth aircraft, does this mean that pilots will still have to get a positive I.D before firing? In which case, will these planes now find themselves in more gun fights rather than stand off missile shots? If an aircraft is not throwing back a IFF due to stealth, will there be a return to close up encounters?
Guys this is chopper 4, I just pulled this russia mistake into a three circle fight…. Im covering the local news and fore playing with this victim but Ukraine is asking me to let a ground troop have a go. I said 👍 okay. He engaged with him pushing a shopping cart and is winning!
"twice the speed of light"? It sounds like a LUDICROUS speed! ))
"Helmut, what's going on?"
"Sandurz, what's going on?"
"It's Mega-Maid, she's gone from suck, to blow!"
Just wait til they release the PLAID version
Are you guys doing anymore DCS tournaments with commentary!? Those were the best.
9:20 ish. Wait. Please explain this to me, because I thought, and many sources have stated, that super cruise is something only the F22 and more recently Su-50 could do.
Is the difference, that an F-22 can accelerate to supersonic without an afterburner while the 4th gen fighters you're referring to can only stay supersonic without an afterburner but have to use it to get there?
Technology means little if one fails to take into account the entire ecosystem the platform operates under. The United States armed forces is superior not necessarily because of its technology, but predominantly because of a national, professional, and organizational culture which fosters relatively low authority gradients, and strong adaptability. This stems from the diverse nature of her population. East European and Asian nations struggle with this important variable, because of their homogeneity and rigid authority structures. This is why CRM works so well here in the States, yet has had mixed reviews in those countries. Put simply, in a battle field, American operational protocols allow for autonomous and collaborative decision making processes, even in the absence of leadership. You cut the dragon's head, another one grows. Also, and contrary to how the whole world perceives us, Americans are not arrogant, and are trained to put their egos aside when it comes to operational decisions.
Full disclosure: I am not a US born citizen and am originally from Iran. I was naturalized here. So I understand a thing or two about cultural variances.
Finally someone that has some pride in being american I'm not saying the U.S doesn't have it's large share of problems just like any other country but seems more and more these days people don't understand it appreciate what it means to be part of the free world and especially what it means to be an american
P.S I'm not a U.S citizen though hope to become one day soon
Right on brother. Glad you are here!
Ah, the old Cold War trope is out the box - Ivan is a drone pilot lead on to his target by ground control to launch the missile and be shot down...
Russia has no issue with organizational culture - maybe not quite the Skunk Works but definitely no rigid hierarchy where superior's authority is law of the land. For example Stepan Sukhoi had an open door policy where ANY engineer could step in to share his ideas. Or practice of having junior members to speak first during team meetings (to avoid self censorship due to superior's opinion pressing down on them). They HAD to be creative and flexible to deliver on harsh requirements of USSR time military and even harsher competition - MiG vs Sukhoi vs Yakovlev, Ilyushin vs Tupolev and so on. Most stellar example is USSR Space Shuttle Buran that rest of Soviet Aircraft industry flat out refused to design/build - they stood up a brand new design bureau NPO Molniya for the task.
There is a proven track record and kernel of it was inherited by modern Russia. UAC's biggest problem is (mostly corrupt) top/mid management that has very little or ANY qualification to be in aircraft design industry. It's loyalty over professionalism there. Read up on tragic history of NK-93 engine to get a premier example. Under those conditions it's quite surprising they can even produce new designs at all...
Above all - Russia lacks funding on the level of US defense spending. Some things you just need to throw money (and time) at until you get it right. F35 is actually a good example - myriad or problems and missed deadlines, but program was designed to be unkillable so they just pressed on and resolved most of the issues.
@@OK-1K1 finally someone brings up the funding and time element involved at the core of this stuff.
@@OK-1K1 I don't know. Perhaps it is shifting in some organizations. I suppose in a continuum, with our operating paradigm on one end of the spectrum, and the old USSR on the other, today's Russia is somewhere in the middle maybe? The point is, they have a long way to go, and national culture has a huge impact on the way things get done. We are adaptive, and enjoy the benefit of years of operational experience. Think about our systems. Many of our planes, including fighters, can be fitted with litening targeting pods able to target mobile and fluid targets. The Russians still rely on high workload TV technology (often requiring the use of a second crew member, i.e SU-34s etc.). They are great at scripted flight plans and pre-designated targets. But how much close air support experience do they have? We have over 20. Anecdotally, I have personally met and flown with Russian pilots. Granted they were retired and in the civilian world when I met them (I was at Emirates for a few years before coming back Stateside), but they did often lament in how dependent their systems were. I will also say that our diversity makes our armed forces that much more effective. Think about it.
“That is getting harder and harder to push it forward”
“That’s what she said”
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Besides us (NATO) - who has 5th gen capabilities, outside of small batches with corner cutting?
I look forward to hearing about the test flights even if it fails it will probably end up in Ace Combat so it has that to look forward to
yep the plane can only do 8g turns but on ace combat we can do 30 and nothing will happen so it will be fun lol (i dont rly play ace i play dcs but i saw some impressive drifting stuff with like 180 degrees per second turns on ace p cool game tbh it seems like a nice game to just chill and play)
The narrator hid his Russian accent pretty well with that American movie voice 😂
Lol it was a respectable try. I'm still convinced it was text to speech bot
I can't stand this accent lol. every russian trying to speak the american commentator voice sounds like a clown
I dont think the narrator was russian. However, the "movie voice" is the same in the russian version.
@@therocinante3443 Not gonna lie, i kinda liked it.
Those saw tooth nozzles, how much thrust vectoring can come from these outlets. Looking at the F-22 Thrust Vectoring nozzles look completely different, I know the F-22 is a twin engine but the nozzles work differently than Fat Amy or SU-75?
“Twice the speed of light”
Me: I laughed so hard it startled my family…this made my day.
ME TOO! I was on my back porch and i think my neighbors think I’m crazy. Between the reporter and Movers response i about died.
I thought she meant twice the speed of sound so Mach 2. Then Mover got to the speed with it stating 1.8 Mach i was like oh no she's just an idiot.
Ok, when it will be available in Walmart? I want one for Christmas.
I'm sorry buddy.
Walmart have no distribution rights for sukhoi products. I'm afraid you had to order it online via Russian eBay.
Its not chinese made
@@CrotchRocket78 It will be, as soon as they copy it.
C.W. Lemoine are you somewhat biased or am I just imagining/misunderstanding it? Your statement:" It looks so familiar, I don't know why". Isn't it true when you consider the combination and integration of avionics, aerodynamics and stealth in one jet that they are very limited ways of designing an aircraft. That contributes to the similar look to the F35 in my opinion. What do you think?
Of course I'm biased. I am an American fighter pilot. But given the espionage programs of the Chinese and the Russians, and the amount of data stolen from the F-35 program, it's a bit more than a coincidence.