10:05 is exactly what I'm looking for. It's a lightweight, weather-sealed camera that gives you APS-C dynamic range and resolution, filter threads (!), EVF, flash, articulating screen, and internal ND filter, all without the bulk of interchangeable lenses. I think it's perfect for hiking/backpacking. I shoot mostly landscapes while hiking, so I rarely need the shallow depth of field, and I don't often use the video features for anything serious, so I have no problems with the shortcomings of its lens and video specs. I still enjoyed the review, though. Thanks!
I agree and it’s why I bought a used one a couple of weeks ago. It’s fantastic but a one trick pony, great daylight landscape pictures from a camera you can put a uv/protection filter on and then bung in a jacket pocket and not have to worry about it taking a few knocks.
4:48 Nobody talks about that and it is sad, its such a good debate to have. We tend to compare cameras by their sensor size but we should consider the whole package
I am an owner of the G1X III and I am with you. On stills-side I‘m totally happy for my kind of using the camera. The handling is superb. But videoquality is disappointing, even when comparing with other cameras 1080p footage. But what you did not mention is the weathersealed housing. This is a feature that lacks on most compact-cameras, especially in combination with a large sensor, a flip-touchscreen and an integrated EVF. The built quality and handling of the camera is amazing. Nevertheless its not a camera for everybodys needs and its pricy. Thanks for this great hands-on field test!
nolimbo was also going to bring up the weathersealing which is in my understanding pretty excellent. The previous G1X models didn't have APSC sized sensors either. They were 1.5in ones unique to just those cameras as far as I know. The G5X may have a Sony made 1in sensor so that might be close to a Canon APSC if it is backlit as well. What the G1Xiii has will be more detail (if the lens is indeed optimised for its sensor which it appears to be). These factors still result in the camera being best suited to travel/landscape work just a shame the guys didn't point it out. Does the camera charge via USB? Cos that would be another feather to its travel bow.
I didn’t know it was weather sealed. That’s great. That is something Fuji needs to implement in a future X100 body to make it a perfect travel camera. Regarding build quality, this camera is plastic correct? Or is it magnesium?
The camera body feels so solid and valuable, that its not easy to say. But I do think its plastic. I tried to find out some information about the material on the official german (I am from Germany) website. Nothing about this! When searching for informations about the weather sealed body you have to go deep into the technical discribtion. It hides under "further Informations"... Canon hides one of the outstanding features ... Can't understand that!
I agree that 1700 Canadian is way too much. I picked it up in Korea for $1000 which I think is a bit more reasonable. You hit it right on the head when you said who you think the camera is for. I bought the camera to do the Pacific Crest Trail next year. An all in one compact with weather sealing(however much it is), an articulating screen, filter threads, good video autofocus, and an apsc sensor makes this a bit of a unique offering. The camera is getting a lot of undeserved criticism in my opinion.
I’m now sold on the idea that these camera companies hold a monthly meeting to ensure nobody creates the perfect camera. I mean when I saw that thing had a hot shoe and an articulating screen all I was left to ask was. Is there a mic jack? It would’ve been revolutionary for vloggers such as myself. But no probably some guy from Sony had to put his foot down so the RX100 M5 can still make sales.
Fred Fonacier III id pay 999 or 750 open box right now for the rx100 5 all day especially with the features it offers over this 1600 dollar camera that is your typical featureless canon...canon is betting on its dpaf and color science alone to sell cameras and it isn’t enough...now if there was a mic jack on this then it would be diff but they couldn’t even give us that for $1600 smh
I think vloggers still are a relatively small market. Though what Canon misses is that their viewers might be a bigger market. I do get the idea of leaving a mic jack off. A compact camera is intended to me a single unit which is used as it without additions. Still I think it would be a good thing to include it in the top models. But Canon surely does intentionally leave out features in order to make customers buy more expensive products. This is typical for manufacturers that have a known fan base.
I've always wondered, do you guys rehearse what you're going to say ahead of time? If not, kudos, what you guys do and how you deliver it is an understated art!
We test the cameras and figure out our bullet points before heading out to the shoot, but the structure and content of the review we make up on location. Jordan @ TCSTV
How about the weather sealing? Isn't that a differentiating factor between the G1X III and the other cameras you compared it against? It also has a hot shoe, something not found in the RX100 V, which you mentioned.
I've been looking at the G5X for a while. Waited until the G1X MIII came out so I could see if it was a huge amount better. I think the G5X looks better to, and for the price. G5X is underrated. Really does not look like the G1X MIII has a loot more to offer for some one looking for a small point and shoot.
G5X has a shit lens, though. (same as on my G7X II I had; a disappointment) Their latest approach is to compromise the lens design and try to correct it in software later. It's bogus.
Seems like a Fuji X-T20 with the 18-55 would be a much better camera and even less expensive....and you can change lenses if you get bored of the 18-55 (which is an awesome lens by the way). Hard to understand Canon's thinking on this one. X-T20 is slightly bigger, but not much and has a lot that's missing from the Canon like 4K video.
w8stral2 Sure, if that is one of the most important things for someone then this would be a great camera for those people. Personally, I would love to have a pocketable full frame camera that is fully weather sealed and has a built-in 20 to 400 mm F1.4 zoom lens :-)))
If you even consider those as options then the G1 X III is not the camera for you: camerasize.com/compact/#703.359,723,ha,t Yeah, slightly bigger: 73% more weight and over twice the depth. Ability to change lenses is not an issue on compact cameras. It is like wanting a motor on a bicycle. The main alternatives to this are the G5 X, the G7 X mark II and Sony RX100-series. This camera plays much for the imago of the APS-C sensor. If you put 27 mm lens then you would talk about similar size but without a zoom. camerasize.com/compact/#703.388,723,ha,t
Hooked on Photography Hummm I don’t believe you can compare the G1X mark III with the Fuji XT20. The latter, especially with the 18-55, remains much bigger than you imagine in comparison with the G1X. It would be closer to the XT20 with the 28mm 2.8 pancake. Still the XT20 would remain thicker and would nit have the 18-50 mm range. The comparaison with a mirrorless camera is just not right. Also the G1X M3 has a weatherproof body, like the XT2 which is bigger and more expansive than the XT20. Do not underestimate the benefit of having such a small body weatherproof. It make an absolute difference with all the other cameras of its size. I used it in Thailand and in the snow (back in Belgium) and it did not say a wird of complain. An absolute amazing camera/lens combination (that is very well rated for its sharpness by the different magazines in US, Australia and Europe). When assessing these type of cameras we often forget to focus on those 5 major things that make all the difference: the weather sealing performances, the sharpness of the lens (not only the aperture), the size of the sensor (here the APSC provides for more DR than any of the 1’’ on the market) and the overall size of the body that contains all the above 😊.
Excellent comparison to the G5X. That's what I was looking for and I have my answer. When I don't lug the pro gear, it's the G5X to get it done almost every time. My appreciation for that superbly versatile and compact camera has just gone through the roof. No G1X iii for me. Thank you for this wonderful and scenic review! Keep it up!
Chadd Reed Yes in truth very slightly smaller but still effectively way larger than the 1 inch sensor in the rx100 series that we compared them too. Chris@TCSTV
True the Mk III is 1.6 crop. The Mk II was 1.95 and Mk 1 was 1.85 (4:3). The Mk2 did have faster aperture though but it was much bigger. The G1 X series began before there was EOS M. Now they decided to create a significant size difference between the G1 X and EOS M-series.
I understand they're different formats, but the G1X Mk III is approaching the price of the 80D+18-135 kit here. The margins on those small cameras must be huge.
Fully agreed. When this came out, at first I was like 'oh, wow, props for doing a compact APS-C with zoom!'. But then I saw that the lens isn't very sensitive. Also, it has dualpixel AF, but honestly... if you would've said that was shot on a Panasonic you'd be flooded with 'C-AF sucks on this!', but for some reason people don't give it crap when it's a Canon. The G7X and the Mark II thereof are quite popular with the TH-cam vlogger crowd. This time around there's a vari-angle screen. Finally it flips out from the side, because the problem with a 180 flip down screen is... the tripod would be in the way... you couldn't set it down on a flat surface... the other way around, with a 180 flip up screen is... it would be blocked by the microphone you've mounted on the hotshoe. Which is another point... there's no microphone input. And with all these 'meh' points... it's hugely overpriced as well. Think they've missed the boat on this one.
I´m even hoping for an APS-C sized RX100 with 24-70/1.8-2.8, i tend to think Sony/Zeiss could do it without breaking the bank and the size. fingers crossed.
Your lens, sensor size, ISO math is correct. They just want to make APS-C compact body camera sounds good in marketing department. Even first generation G7X gives better numbers (when you calculate 35mm equivalent) than G1X Mark III and you can buy that camera used for 300 USD/EUR, which I did. 100mm equivalent (on G5/7X) makes difference when it comes to separating background and reach, not only compared to G1X Mark III, but also compared to RX100 series. Downside of 1" Canon cameras (G7X/G5X Mark I or II) is Sony sensor inside that makes pictures little bit lifeless compared to other large sensor Canon cameras. Photos from G1X Mark III are more pleasant, especially if you do not plan to develop raw.
Nice review. Really liked the grade on this one. About the equivalency - if you put equivalent focal length on screen, you might also want to put equivalent F-stop so that people better understand what you are talking about, and that they don't have to search for crop factors and use a calculator. So, equivalent F-stops at 70mm equivalent are G1X III @ F5.6 (equiv. F9) vs G5X @ F2.8 (equiv. F7.6). So, G5X has shallower depth of field at that equivalent focal length, and receives more light - a bit more than 1/3 of a stop.
I was really keen on this camera, but just couldn't justify the price for the limited zoom range. Was able to get an M5 with 14-45 & 55-200 lenses, adapter ring and extra battery all in for less than the before tax price on this one. Maybe should have waited to see if there was a G5X M2 coming, but needed the smaller camera for an upcoming trip.
It doesn't have the fully articulated screen either, which I love. But it was still more bang for the buck IMO. I did consider other brands, but I've been shooting Canon since the A1 and just wasn't ready to switch.
Vincent Wu Because canon only wants to make you slightly happy. But not too happy. If they give us an inch we might end up loving the cameras. 😁 Chris@TCSTV
Late to the game looking at this review, and some 4 years later I would note that although there appears to be threading on the outermost portion of the barrel that fits a filter of around 37mm this is not the purpose of those threads. I believe that this was most likely a standard size barrel threading assembly they used to access the interior of the lens during manufacture. Canon support says there could be vignette if a filter is used, and an impact on the filter *could* damage the front element- it's that close with some filter brands. Canon does make but seldom advertises the LH DC-110 Lens Hood and Filter Adapter Kit for PowerShot G1 X MARK III. Best way to avoid scratching the lens.
I fully agree with Chris - the APS-C sensor in the G1X doesn't makes sense at all as the f2.8-5.6 lens is the weak Point. If you use the G5X at 24mm f1.8 ISO1600 then it is f2.8 ISO4000 at the G1X. At the Long end it is even worse with f2.8 vs. f5.6 at ISO5000. So what is the Point of the G1X? Weather resistance, faster AF, faster Operation ok, but double the Price...???
Great review and fun to watch (as always). I think the remarks about the smaller sensors and brighter lenses on rival compacts are all valid points. what I am missing in the review is sharpness of the lens. The lens on the G5X is said to be somewhat soft whereas the lens on the G1X Mark III seems supersharp. What's your view on that? This also is pretty important to mention I think. Also, most other compacts are not water-/dust resistant. So other camera's will get dust in lenses and/or sensor somewhere down the line. This would seem like a major advantage of the G1X Mark III. what's your opinion on that? Please keep up the good work on these great and fun reviews!
The G5 X is 36.8 mm at f/2.8 i.e 13 mm aperture. The G1 X III is 45 mm at f/5.6 i.e. 8 mm aperture. The aperture is same as the maximum background blur when measured on the focal plane so in this the G5 X or G 7 X is better. The G1 X III is good if you primarily use the wide angle.
Jordan looked like he was running from a grizzly bear. No sound, but it appeared he was screaming like he actually was. No matter, you guys have some lovely landscape up there.
Someone explain to me why I would buy this for $1600 over the SL2 or the t7i or the 77d for half the price and be able to switch lenses and put a mic on it instead of this fixed lens with a terrible aperture?
Okaro X good point but the Sony rx100 V is prob a better camera and value for cheaper the only thing is you don’t get an aps-c sensor...I just don’t see anyone paying 1600 for this,that’s what gets me is the price is should be 5-600 dollars cheaper at least...it’s more than the 6500 and that camera would blow this one out of the water
I just can't decide between this and the Fuji x-t20 with the 18-55mm lens. I plan on using my camera for long distance hiking and landscapes. The G1X Miii is weather sealed BTW. Any advice?
I do follow you guys from the very beginning, and this hands-on is one of the best. The amount of relevant information is really good, but I wish you would go deeper when it came to sensor size and aperture. Very nice video nonetheless!
Thanks guys. I am always looking for a better travel camera to replace my ZS50 Lumix. So far happy with how Panny has got a good grip on this market. Maybe a 1" sensor Lumix might be the ticket but hate to give up the zoom range. BTW about to jump on a GH5. You guys continue to show how the GH5 is a great video camera. Nice shallow depth of field. I guess those who complain that MFT doesn't provide nice DOF should watch some GH5 videos.
Thank you for an honest review. Before this review, I had the idea to change my g7xm2 for this model but now I think I will stay with the current... Thank you so much...
I really hope canon could offer something like the G1X III with a 28 or 35 equivalent F2 or F2.8 lens which would take advantage of that APSC sensor and its professional level body design.
Great Video with Great Analysis. Thank you for high lightening the 70mm Bokeh difference between an APS-C @f/5.6 vs 1" @F/2.8. That shot alone killed the G1x3 from my consideration.
When you really check how far the lens with lens cap protrudes when the Canon G1X Mark III is turned off, and when you know exactly where the battery is located, then you realize that they could have build a much bigger grip to fit a battery with a LOT of battery life in that camera, without making it much bulkier. I mean, who would pack any rather pricey compact camera without a lens cap on the lens, so, in this case, the camera is as bulky as its lens with lens cap protrudes. On top of that the Canon NB-13L is a rather old model of a rechargeable battery pack (like 4 years or even more), and there have been quite some improvements in battery technology since the 1st start of this model of Canon batteries. I have a Canon G7X that I intended to use for underwater photography with the same Canon NB-13L battery model, and that I bought with the Canon waterproof casing, but I quickly found out how limited it was (ultra short battery life, screen just not bright enough for underwater shooting, etc..., etc... ) ... in short, impossible to use for underwater photography. So I got a professional casing for my Sony A7 II to do underwater photography with a lot of satisfaction (the Sony A7 II doesn't have an extremely long battery life, but it's way way better than the Canon G7X for the job), and I wound up only using the Canon G7X with its casing on the kayak with my son, or at the beach, or just as a small and cheap (although it was expensive for what it really was) point & shoot camera to stuff in my pocket, and that's pretty much about it. Quite frankly it all looks to me as the new Canon G1X Mark III is just another EXPENSIVE TOY. And, as I'm not the kind to jump on every "new thing" shat by the industry, I just wait until something really good and competitive is being produced.
Jim bob: it is a shame that Ricoh does not produce any TTL flash for the GR cameras. That largely defeats the purpose of the leaf shutter, as not every photographer wants to shoot flash in manual mode 100% of the time.
I have a G1x and the deep dynamic range pretty much the same as full frame. The landscape photos on the computer monitor looks like I'm looking through a clear window, incredible transparent feel. If you don't need bokeh effects or fast autofocus, big zoom range, or a smaller body, This kind of pocketable machine is excellent. No one will probably notice from the photos that the camera is so small.
Great review (as always)! The once so innovative Canon still refuses to put in 4K in their consumer cameras, not even sharp 1080p........I don´t get it.
Who this camera is for: professionals who travel and are sick of wearing huge cameras. Seriously, if i were sponsored to go on an international trip, this is the camera I would be packing. Mind you, I do portraiture, so the hot shoe is more relevant to me than sensor size, but it’s still quite a good camera for travel.
myheartandi999 Well, if you’re going all the way to M6 or M5 territory then I would go with a Lumix G85; less expensive, much better lens selection, IBIS, 4k, etc.
It looks like a great travel camera for non video use. Small, decent sensor and probably much better battery life than the sony. You did not mention battery life that I recall which is a shame.
Another excellent video. It's refreshing to get a considered view on a camera's real-world use. Of course, the wilderness survival tips are really why I watch your channel. :)
I'm looking to buy a compact camera that can take good pictures. I'm more into landscape, and I usually backpack or climb mountains. Would you recommend this camera or G5x or lumix LX10, Sony rx100 v?
The "high ISO benefit" at 9:10 is wrong reasoning. For the same depth of field the 1 inch sensor will have lower iso and same (maybe a bit better!) overall image. Otherwise nice comparison and thanks for talking about equivalency
for me it's Lumix LX10/15, and I usually shoot with bracketing when it comes for landscapes, so that greater dynamic range of G1X wouldn't even matter that much.
Thank you. Solved my issue. I was considering this camera or the Sony rx100 as my carry option when not wanting to use the dslr. But i now realize that neither is the answer and the best option really is the G5x Mk2. Great review. Very honest and straightforward. Best around by far. Wish i had some beautiful snow to shoot, but not much of that here in Sydney.
Just picked up a G5X ii. Limited shooting options here in Melbourne in lock down though :( Did you end up getting one? I'm still not sure if i'll keep it tbh, i'd like to have a play with a G1X iii.
Nice comparison. I am surprised that there are so few reviews of the G1X iii on the web. I have been waiting for a G5X refresh with the Digic 7and click / no click option on the manual control ring. Probably not going to happen. I love my G16 but want a pivoting touch screen. I do find it hard to justify the US $500+ difference in price between the cameras for my needs. Is the OVF the same on both cameras?
It can be a great option for people who don't know about photography/cameras, walk into a best buy and ask for a good all around camera and the sales guy who knows slightly more recommends this because it's a point and shoot with a big sensor........
Hey Chris. Nice review, however, as a 100% stills guy, this review seemed to play to the video capabilities (or lack thereof). Regarding your comparison to the G5, you forgot to mention that the larger APS-C sensor of the G1 mark III would allow for greater sharpness and detail retention in very large poster prints. As a primarily Fuji X-System (X-T3) landscape and product shooter, my main criterion for this "travel" camera is lens sharpness, detail rendition, and overall image quality in still photography, for when traveling to areas in which I prefer not to take my X-T3, i.e., very infrequent beach photography. This G1 Mark III seems to fit my criteria, and I understand is somewhat weather "resistant" as well! That said, if you have a better recommendation for my occassional foray to a beach/sand/ocean environment, please do let me know. Thanks!
I own a Canon 200D with Sigma 18-35 lens, I only do photography (no video). While I'm happy with the quality of the images, it is quite not a convenient combo to use because it is big and heavy and I'm traveling all the time. It is therefore necessary to somehow plan to make a photo session with a backpack etc. and the whole is really not discreet when you want to do street photography for example. It is not the type of combo you bring with you when going to the restaurant or stuff like that. I am therefore looking for a high quality camera that is versatile, but above all that I could have everywhere with me, for example to take improvised pictures in the beautiful streets of Tokyo or elsewhere, without being too much noticed. The main interest of this camera for me is to have aps-c quality sensor, with a quality lens, easy to carry and discreet. The best camera is the one you have with you they say
So what if I said, I want a fairly versatile camera for travel (mostly urban - city visits but some landscapes too) and I want small (I have traveled with my DSLR and mirrorless and I just don't want the bother. The smaller the better but the most important issue is image quality - I like to print some of my travel pics in large sizes. I know that the Sony RX1 or Leica's will likely have better quality but I'm OK with G1X iii price but that's about the limit (although there does seem to be a few RX1's used out there for about the same money as a new G1X iii). It seems like the G1X iii is it. When comparing the G1X iii to the G5X a dpreviews image comparator the G1X iii looks sharper. The G7X ii looks closer to the G1X iii for picture quality??? Am I missing something?
Great video! at first, was planning to buy G7X Mark II but also had my eyes on the G5X much more. I was waiting for this camera if it is worth it. since this review, I think I will go for the G5X. what about you guys there ? G5X or G1X Mark III ?
It's great to have an APSC sensor, but it's basically for daylight shots but the fact that it has a slow lens(f2.8-5.6) makes me apprehensive about its low light capabilities.
It's a daylight camera for snap shooters on vacation that don't want to carry the DSLR. Travel photographers might like it, but honestly an RX100 or RX10 would serve them better.
RufusLeakin: There is something you can attach to the hot shoe to help you with low light. On the other hand, I have no idea how the AF is in low light, though.
Go with the Nikon D7500 if you want the best low light capabilities. At high ISOs, it will give you much cleaner images than the other two. Canon's APS-C cameras are not that good in lowlight. They produce very grainy, noisy images at high ISOs. Even the entry-level Nikon D3400 produces cleaner images than the Canon 80D at high ISOs. The Sony A6300 is also good but the Nikon D7500 is still better. Here's a comparison between the three cameras at ISO 6400 including the Nikon D3400 at DPreview: bit.ly/2CXD4JX
i have g1x mark3 this camera but shocked that you doesn't recommend this camera in last. yes lens is most weak point of this camera comparing this sensor, could you recommend another camera model which has similar size with g1x mark3?
Does anyone know if you have full manual control options when shooting video with this G1X Mark III? Can you completely control shutter speed, aperture, ISO, and white balance?
Nice review..planning a nice 21day tour of beautiful Canada (from east to west) in in a few weeks from The Netherlands.. thinking if my iphone 6 with a gimbal would be enough.. Or if i should invest in to a gimbal with the Sony RX100 6.. looking at possible alternatives..Any tips would be very welcome..For a noob the world of camera's is pretty overwhelming to say the least.. hahah
G5XII has much more reach and faster lens. The actual lens is 44mm vs 45mm (2.8 vs 5.6), that tells us how much it collects light regardless of sensor size. It's also smaller and lighter with less controls. G1X has better IQ in good light, bigger sensor and resolution. Overall G1X is slagging because it's lens is so bad.
Christian Plath I like them a lot although this was the first time I wore it as Intended, As a belt. I usually throw it over my shoulder which works but somewhat akwardly. Chris@TCSTV
I'm Nikon shooter and I enjoy your every single camera review Chris, I use D750 and D7500 and waiting for D750 successor and review of it on your channel :)
@TheCameraStore A great review as usual. I’m also curious to know who makes that light grey fanny pack. It looks very practical. Does anyone know? Thanks
Very interesting, the comparison with the G5X. I’ve been campaigning for a year for a Mark 2 that would have the same processor and sensor improvements as the G7X Mk 2, plus the essential mic input for vloggers. If space is the problem, get rid of the unnecessary remote socket (use the app!). Would be a nigh-perfect compact - 4K if you must, although I could live without it. I would buy one - and I have a M5!
10:05 is exactly what I'm looking for. It's a lightweight, weather-sealed camera that gives you APS-C dynamic range and resolution, filter threads (!), EVF, flash, articulating screen, and internal ND filter, all without the bulk of interchangeable lenses. I think it's perfect for hiking/backpacking. I shoot mostly landscapes while hiking, so I rarely need the shallow depth of field, and I don't often use the video features for anything serious, so I have no problems with the shortcomings of its lens and video specs. I still enjoyed the review, though. Thanks!
I agree and it’s why I bought a used one a couple of weeks ago. It’s fantastic but a one trick pony, great daylight landscape pictures from a camera you can put a uv/protection filter on and then bung in a jacket pocket and not have to worry about it taking a few knocks.
4:48
Nobody talks about that and it is sad, its such a good debate to have. We tend to compare cameras by their sensor size but we should consider the whole package
You hit the nail on the head with the 1 inch sensor equivalency. This is why you guys are such fantastic reviewers.
well it's not just about image quality, it's about depth of field
Your reviews that are shot in the mountains are the best. Nice to hear reviewers actually not bashing Canon for a change. Great job!
I am an owner of the G1X III and I am with you. On stills-side I‘m totally happy for my kind of using the camera. The handling is superb. But videoquality is disappointing, even when comparing with other cameras 1080p footage. But what you did not mention is the weathersealed housing. This is a feature that lacks on most compact-cameras, especially in combination with a large sensor, a flip-touchscreen and an integrated EVF. The built quality and handling of the camera is amazing. Nevertheless its not a camera for everybodys needs and its pricy. Thanks for this great hands-on field test!
nolimbo was also going to bring up the weathersealing which is in my understanding pretty excellent. The previous G1X models didn't have APSC sized sensors either. They were 1.5in ones unique to just those cameras as far as I know. The G5X may have a Sony made 1in sensor so that might be close to a Canon APSC if it is backlit as well. What the G1Xiii has will be more detail (if the lens is indeed optimised for its sensor which it appears to be). These factors still result in the camera being best suited to travel/landscape work just a shame the guys didn't point it out. Does the camera charge via USB? Cos that would be another feather to its travel bow.
Yes, it does charge via USB!
I didn’t know it was weather sealed. That’s great. That is something Fuji needs to implement in a future X100 body to make it a perfect travel camera.
Regarding build quality, this camera is plastic correct? Or is it magnesium?
The camera body feels so solid and valuable, that its not easy to say. But I do think its plastic. I tried to find out some information about the material on the official german (I am from Germany) website. Nothing about this! When searching for informations about the weather sealed body you have to go deep into the technical discribtion. It hides under "further Informations"... Canon hides one of the outstanding features ... Can't understand that!
i must say this is a very beautiful place. the total video seemed very nice to watch. and of course good review of the camera
Totally agree!
Kai E. thank you :)
Yes, I agree. Very uplifting.
I agree that 1700 Canadian is way too much. I picked it up in Korea for $1000 which I think is a bit more reasonable. You hit it right on the head when you said who you think the camera is for. I bought the camera to do the Pacific Crest Trail next year. An all in one compact with weather sealing(however much it is), an articulating screen, filter threads, good video autofocus, and an apsc sensor makes this a bit of a unique offering. The camera is getting a lot of undeserved criticism in my opinion.
I’m now sold on the idea that these camera companies hold a monthly meeting to ensure nobody creates the perfect camera. I mean when I saw that thing had a hot shoe and an articulating screen all I was left to ask was. Is there a mic jack? It would’ve been revolutionary for vloggers such as myself. But no probably some guy from Sony had to put his foot down so the RX100 M5 can still make sales.
Fred Fonacier III id pay 999 or 750 open box right now for the rx100 5 all day especially with the features it offers over this 1600 dollar camera that is your typical featureless canon...canon is betting on its dpaf and color science alone to sell cameras and it isn’t enough...now if there was a mic jack on this then it would be diff but they couldn’t even give us that for $1600 smh
Seems like the SL2 would do all this and more ( interchangeable lenses ) in a small body ( 50gr difference in weight) for half the price...
I think vloggers still are a relatively small market. Though what Canon misses is that their viewers might be a bigger market. I do get the idea of leaving a mic jack off. A compact camera is intended to me a single unit which is used as it without additions. Still I think it would be a good thing to include it in the top models.
But Canon surely does intentionally leave out features in order to make customers buy more expensive products. This is typical for manufacturers that have a known fan base.
Okaro X I agree 100% but 1600 bucks?
@th-cam.com/users/MrKikoboys : Thomas Heaton would agree:
th-cam.com/video/lZKYB6MEPAU/w-d-xo.html
As do I^^
I've always wondered, do you guys rehearse what you're going to say ahead of time? If not, kudos, what you guys do and how you deliver it is an understated art!
We test the cameras and figure out our bullet points before heading out to the shoot, but the structure and content of the review we make up on location.
Jordan @ TCSTV
Talent is the word that comes to mind. Thanks for all your videos, best wishes in 2018!
So glad they brought this workflow and style over to DPReview. It’s basically the same videos with a different intro.
How about the weather sealing? Isn't that a differentiating factor between the G1X III and the other cameras you compared it against? It also has a hot shoe, something not found in the RX100 V, which you mentioned.
Is this is still a good camera to buy, because i had a go on one recently and loved its handling
Colors and contrast of the G1X Mark III are much nicer than on the G5. A nice picture is not about depth of field and focal length
This is a great sale of the G5X. All the comparison shots I felt the colors and clarity were better on the G5X.
I've been looking at the G5X for a while. Waited until the G1X MIII came out so I could see if it was a huge amount better. I think the G5X looks better to, and for the price. G5X is underrated. Really does not look like the G1X MIII has a loot more to offer for some one looking for a small point and shoot.
I'll keep that in mind, thanks for the head up!
G1x has more accurate colors
G5X has a shit lens, though. (same as on my G7X II I had; a disappointment) Their latest approach is to compromise the lens design and try to correct it in software later. It's bogus.
Seems like a Fuji X-T20 with the 18-55 would be a much better camera and even less expensive....and you can change lenses if you get bored of the 18-55 (which is an awesome lens by the way). Hard to understand Canon's thinking on this one. X-T20 is slightly bigger, but not much and has a lot that's missing from the Canon like 4K video.
Hooked on Photography exactly right.
w8stral2 Sure, if that is one of the most important things for someone then this would be a great camera for those people. Personally, I would love to have a pocketable full frame camera that is fully weather sealed and has a built-in 20 to 400 mm F1.4 zoom lens :-)))
If you even consider those as options then the G1 X III is not the camera for you:
camerasize.com/compact/#703.359,723,ha,t
Yeah, slightly bigger: 73% more weight and over twice the depth.
Ability to change lenses is not an issue on compact cameras. It is like wanting a motor on a bicycle.
The main alternatives to this are the G5 X, the G7 X mark II and Sony RX100-series. This camera plays much for the imago of the APS-C sensor.
If you put 27 mm lens then you would talk about similar size but without a zoom.
camerasize.com/compact/#703.388,723,ha,t
Hooked on Photography The Fuji kit you mention wouldn't be as compact, it isn't weather sealed, and it doesn't have a leaf shutter.
Hooked on Photography Hummm I don’t believe you can compare the G1X mark III with the Fuji XT20. The latter, especially with the 18-55, remains much bigger than you imagine in comparison with the G1X. It would be closer to the XT20 with the 28mm 2.8 pancake. Still the XT20 would remain thicker and would nit have the 18-50 mm range. The comparaison with a mirrorless camera is just not right. Also the G1X M3 has a weatherproof body, like the XT2 which is bigger and more expansive than the XT20. Do not underestimate the benefit of having such a small body weatherproof. It make an absolute difference with all the other cameras of its size. I used it in Thailand and in the snow (back in Belgium) and it did not say a wird of complain. An absolute amazing camera/lens combination (that is very well rated for its sharpness by the different magazines in US, Australia and Europe). When assessing these type of cameras we often forget to focus on those 5 major things that make all the difference: the weather sealing performances, the sharpness of the lens (not only the aperture), the size of the sensor (here the APSC provides for more DR than any of the 1’’ on the market) and the overall size of the body that contains all the above 😊.
Excellent comparison to the G5X. That's what I was looking for and I have my answer. When I don't lug the pro gear, it's the G5X to get it done almost every time. My appreciation for that superbly versatile and compact camera has just gone through the roof. No G1X iii for me. Thank you for this wonderful and scenic review! Keep it up!
Loving the grade and look of that GH5 footage.
you mention the g1x m1 and m2 as APS-C but they were 1.5" sensors so they were a bit smaller.
Chadd Reed Yes in truth very slightly smaller but still effectively way larger than the 1 inch sensor in the rx100 series that we compared them too.
Chris@TCSTV
It is not slightly smaller than aps-c. It is half way between 1" and aps-c sensors.
True the Mk III is 1.6 crop. The Mk II was 1.95 and Mk 1 was 1.85 (4:3). The Mk2 did have faster aperture though but it was much bigger. The G1 X series began before there was EOS M. Now they decided to create a significant size difference between the G1 X and EOS M-series.
This was an excellent review. The comparison with the brighter 5x was enlightening.
So happy to see Cosyspeed Camslinger in use. I have exactly the same bag and just live it.
Be careful. You don't want to get dangerously close to chipmunks.
I understand they're different formats, but the G1X Mk III is approaching the price of the 80D+18-135 kit here. The margins on those small cameras must be huge.
The margins on Canon and Nikon is close to ZERO
Yeah lul manufacturer margins are zero for a €1300 compact that costs the same as a top APSC DSLR with a very good midrange-quality kit lens
For retailers it´s hopeless, maybe the manufacturers make some...
Fully agreed. When this came out, at first I was like 'oh, wow, props for doing a compact APS-C with zoom!'. But then I saw that the lens isn't very sensitive. Also, it has dualpixel AF, but honestly... if you would've said that was shot on a Panasonic you'd be flooded with 'C-AF sucks on this!', but for some reason people don't give it crap when it's a Canon. The G7X and the Mark II thereof are quite popular with the TH-cam vlogger crowd. This time around there's a vari-angle screen. Finally it flips out from the side, because the problem with a 180 flip down screen is... the tripod would be in the way... you couldn't set it down on a flat surface... the other way around, with a 180 flip up screen is... it would be blocked by the microphone you've mounted on the hotshoe. Which is another point... there's no microphone input. And with all these 'meh' points... it's hugely overpriced as well. Think they've missed the boat on this one.
Been anticipating this. Great work as always. Thanks guys
Chris its main advantage over g5X it's that it doesn't get so much dust inside the lens, as G1X III is now weather-sealed !
Excellent. Really like how specific you got on what the cam is working for.
Love your videos. Wouldn't an updated Panasonic LX100 be a better combination of sensor size, body size and lens speed?
I´m even hoping for an APS-C sized RX100 with 24-70/1.8-2.8, i tend to think Sony/Zeiss could do it without breaking the bank and the size. fingers crossed.
netmaster78 that lens would be huge to cover an APS-C sensor. Think RX10 size.
Your lens, sensor size, ISO math is correct. They just want to make APS-C compact body camera sounds good in marketing department. Even first generation G7X gives better numbers (when you calculate 35mm equivalent) than G1X Mark III and you can buy that camera used for 300 USD/EUR, which I did. 100mm equivalent (on G5/7X) makes difference when it comes to separating background and reach, not only compared to G1X Mark III, but also compared to RX100 series. Downside of 1" Canon cameras (G7X/G5X Mark I or II) is Sony sensor inside that makes pictures little bit lifeless compared to other large sensor Canon cameras. Photos from G1X Mark III are more pleasant, especially if you do not plan to develop raw.
thanks for that info. useful info about the sensor also.
Nice review. Really liked the grade on this one. About the equivalency - if you put equivalent focal length on screen, you might also want to put equivalent F-stop so that people better understand what you are talking about, and that they don't have to search for crop factors and use a calculator. So, equivalent F-stops at 70mm equivalent are G1X III @ F5.6 (equiv. F9) vs G5X @ F2.8 (equiv. F7.6). So, G5X has shallower depth of field at that equivalent focal length, and receives more light - a bit more than 1/3 of a stop.
I was really keen on this camera, but just couldn't justify the price for the limited zoom range. Was able to get an M5 with 14-45 & 55-200 lenses, adapter ring and extra battery all in for less than the before tax price on this one. Maybe should have waited to see if there was a G5X M2 coming, but needed the smaller camera for an upcoming trip.
stotes57 I though the M5 was somewhat overpriced but compared to this camera it's a straight out bargain.
Chris@TCSTV
chris: the EOS M5 isn't weather sealed and it doesn't have a leaf shutter.
It doesn't have the fully articulated screen either, which I love. But it was still more bang for the buck IMO. I did consider other brands, but I've been shooting Canon since the A1 and just wasn't ready to switch.
please remind me why EOS-M5 and EOS-M6 doesn't have full articulation screen like G1X mark III?
Vincent Wu Because canon only wants to make you slightly happy. But not too happy. If they give us an inch we might end up loving the cameras. 😁
Chris@TCSTV
actually fully articulation screen makes the camera look a lot larger during vlogging. flipping up is the best size you can get
The M5 and SL2 should have been discussed as alternatives. The G1X is not a good first camera.
Because a typical use of the screen is to tilt it up and that works better with the screen that is on those.
Martin Breslow YOU are right, it is not a good first camera. One should look for example G7 X II or and ILC.
This video is nearly a year old, but its helped me so much. Thank you.
Late to the game looking at this review, and some 4 years later I would note that although there appears to be threading on the outermost portion of the barrel that fits a filter of around 37mm this is not the purpose of those threads. I believe that this was most likely a standard size barrel threading assembly they used to access the interior of the lens during manufacture.
Canon support says there could be vignette if a filter is used, and an impact on the filter *could* damage the front element- it's that close with some filter brands.
Canon does make but seldom advertises the LH DC-110 Lens Hood and Filter Adapter Kit for PowerShot G1 X MARK III. Best way to avoid scratching the lens.
Nice review, I wait for g1x IV with 24-72 mm as gx5 (f1.8-28) That will be a perfect everyday camera for people and for street photography!
Also waiting. Has there been any news yet or just rumours?
I fully agree with Chris - the APS-C sensor in the G1X doesn't makes sense at all as the f2.8-5.6 lens is the weak Point. If you use the G5X at 24mm f1.8 ISO1600 then it is f2.8 ISO4000 at the G1X. At the Long end it is even worse with f2.8 vs. f5.6 at ISO5000. So what is the Point of the G1X? Weather resistance, faster AF, faster Operation ok, but double the Price...???
Great review and fun to watch (as always).
I think the remarks about the smaller sensors and brighter lenses on rival compacts are all valid points.
what I am missing in the review is sharpness of the lens.
The lens on the G5X is said to be somewhat soft whereas the lens on the G1X Mark III seems supersharp.
What's your view on that?
This also is pretty important to mention I think.
Also, most other compacts are not water-/dust resistant. So other camera's will get dust in lenses and/or sensor somewhere down the line.
This would seem like a major advantage of the G1X Mark III.
what's your opinion on that?
Please keep up the good work on these great and fun reviews!
guys i really liked the place you're shooting this video....gorgeous snow and landscapes....
The G5 X is 36.8 mm at f/2.8 i.e 13 mm aperture. The G1 X III is 45 mm at f/5.6 i.e. 8 mm aperture. The aperture is same as the maximum background blur when measured on the focal plane so in this the G5 X or G 7 X is better. The G1 X III is good if you primarily use the wide angle.
nicely done. and thanks for that winter footage. good contrast to where I am.
Good points... G5x will be my next light weight camera.
Jordan looked like he was running from a grizzly bear. No sound, but it appeared he was screaming like he actually was. No matter, you guys have some lovely landscape up there.
Someone explain to me why I would buy this for $1600 over the SL2 or the t7i or the 77d for half the price and be able to switch lenses and put a mic on it instead of this fixed lens with a terrible aperture?
Because none of those will fit your pocket. The one who buys this already has a Canon DSLR, likely a FF one.
Okaro X good point but the Sony rx100 V is prob a better camera and value for cheaper the only thing is you don’t get an aps-c sensor...I just don’t see anyone paying 1600 for this,that’s what gets me is the price is should be 5-600 dollars cheaper at least...it’s more than the 6500 and that camera would blow this one out of the water
matt wilson: Compactness, Leaf Shutter, Weather Sealing, and EVF.
Leaf shutter. Leaf shutter. Leaf shutter
matt: Enjoy Sony's customer service!
I wish Panasonic would do a LX200 with the new GH5s sensor. Would be cool to have a compact that's also a lowlight beast.
love GH5 videos as always.
I just can't decide between this and the Fuji x-t20 with the 18-55mm lens. I plan on using my camera for long distance hiking and landscapes. The G1X Miii is weather sealed BTW.
Any advice?
I do follow you guys from the very beginning, and this hands-on is one of the best. The amount of relevant information is really good, but I wish you would go deeper when it came to sensor size and aperture. Very nice video nonetheless!
Thanks guys. I am always looking for a better travel camera to replace my ZS50 Lumix. So far happy with how Panny has got a good grip on this market. Maybe a 1" sensor Lumix might be the ticket but hate to give up the zoom range. BTW about to jump on a GH5. You guys continue to show how the GH5 is a great video camera. Nice shallow depth of field. I guess those who complain that MFT doesn't provide nice DOF should watch some GH5 videos.
Thank you for an honest review. Before this review, I had the idea to change my g7xm2 for this model but now I think I will stay with the current... Thank you so much...
I really hope canon could offer something like the G1X III with a 28 or 35 equivalent F2 or F2.8 lens which would take advantage of that APSC sensor and its professional level body design.
韩乔宇: I second that. Something like the Fuji x100S but with weather sealing.
Great Video with Great Analysis. Thank you for high lightening the 70mm Bokeh difference between an APS-C @f/5.6 vs 1" @F/2.8. That shot alone killed the G1x3 from my consideration.
Thanks for the review of the G5x. I have a greater appreciation for my camera.
What is the best compact camera available today, with regards to optics and ISO performance?
And again ... Canon has us disappointed... :(
had high expectations
When you really check how far the lens with lens cap protrudes when the Canon G1X Mark III is turned off, and when you know exactly where the battery is located, then you realize that they could have build a much bigger grip to fit a battery with a LOT of battery life in that camera, without making it much bulkier.
I mean, who would pack any rather pricey compact camera without a lens cap on the lens, so, in this case, the camera is as bulky as its lens with lens cap protrudes.
On top of that the Canon NB-13L is a rather old model of a rechargeable battery pack (like 4 years or even more), and there have been quite some improvements in battery technology since the 1st start of this model of Canon batteries.
I have a Canon G7X that I intended to use for underwater photography with the same Canon NB-13L battery model, and that I bought with the Canon waterproof casing, but I quickly found out how limited it was (ultra short battery life, screen just not bright enough for underwater shooting, etc..., etc... ) ... in short, impossible to use for underwater photography. So I got a professional casing for my Sony A7 II to do underwater photography with a lot of satisfaction (the Sony A7 II doesn't have an extremely long battery life, but it's way way better than the Canon G7X for the job), and I wound up only using the Canon G7X with its casing on the kayak with my son, or at the beach, or just as a small and cheap (although it was expensive for what it really was) point & shoot camera to stuff in my pocket, and that's pretty much about it.
Quite frankly it all looks to me as the new Canon G1X Mark III is just another EXPENSIVE TOY.
And, as I'm not the kind to jump on every "new thing" shat by the industry, I just wait until something really good and competitive is being produced.
Hey Jordan, could you tell us in the future what lenses where used in the video? at 8:00 is that the sigma 18-35? :D
Good eye! This whole video was shot on my beloved Sigma 18-35/Metabones Speed Booster .71X Combo.
Jordan @ TCSTV
Hello
Nothing has really ever come close to the Ricoh Gr which thanks to this video I’ll be keeping for another few years, or until the Gr Mark III.
Jim bob: it is a shame that Ricoh does not produce any TTL flash for the GR cameras. That largely defeats the purpose of the leaf shutter, as not every photographer wants to shoot flash in manual mode 100% of the time.
I have a G1x and the deep dynamic range pretty much the same as full frame. The landscape photos on the computer monitor looks like I'm looking through a clear window, incredible transparent feel. If you don't need bokeh effects or fast autofocus, big zoom range, or a smaller body, This kind of pocketable machine is excellent. No one will probably notice from the photos that the camera is so small.
Great review (as always)! The once so innovative Canon still refuses to put in 4K in their consumer cameras, not even sharp 1080p........I don´t get it.
Minor correction, I believe the G1X Mark 1/2 has a 1.5 inch sensor rather than a APSC sized sensor.
Who this camera is for: professionals who travel and are sick of wearing huge cameras. Seriously, if i were sponsored to go on an international trip, this is the camera I would be packing. Mind you, I do portraiture, so the hot shoe is more relevant to me than sensor size, but it’s still quite a good camera for travel.
Great review and hands on as always guys. To me this isnt worth the price to be a vlog camera, look into the M5 or M6 instead.
Eric Rossi I am with you and I would suggest EOS M6 to my friends.
myheartandi999 Well, if you’re going all the way to M6 or M5 territory then I would go with a Lumix G85; less expensive, much better lens selection, IBIS, 4k, etc.
Peter Paul Chato but also losing better color and dual pixel autofocus
annoying marketing strategies :)
Not sure about the G1X but the GH5 footage was just spectacular. Thanks
It looks like a great travel camera for non video use. Small, decent sensor and probably much better battery life than the sony.
You did not mention battery life that I recall which is a shame.
Ran Bar-Levi I thought we did record that. Jordan may have cut it out or missed it. I'm not sure.
Chris@TCSTV
Another excellent video. It's refreshing to get a considered view on a camera's real-world use. Of course, the wilderness survival tips are really why I watch your channel. :)
I'm looking to buy a compact camera that can take good pictures. I'm more into landscape, and I usually backpack or climb mountains. Would you recommend this camera or G5x or lumix LX10, Sony rx100 v?
The "high ISO benefit" at 9:10 is wrong reasoning. For the same depth of field the 1 inch sensor will have lower iso and same (maybe a bit better!) overall image. Otherwise nice comparison and thanks for talking about equivalency
for me it's Lumix LX10/15, and I usually shoot with bracketing when it comes for landscapes, so that greater dynamic range of G1X wouldn't even matter that much.
Thank you.
Solved my issue.
I was considering this camera or the Sony rx100 as my carry option when not wanting to use the dslr.
But i now realize that neither is the answer and the best option really is the G5x Mk2.
Great review. Very honest and straightforward. Best around by far.
Wish i had some beautiful snow to shoot, but not much of that here in Sydney.
Just picked up a G5X ii. Limited shooting options here in Melbourne in lock down though :(
Did you end up getting one? I'm still not sure if i'll keep it tbh, i'd like to have a play with a G1X iii.
Nice comparison. I am surprised that there are so few reviews of the G1X iii on the web. I have been waiting for a G5X refresh with the Digic 7and click / no click option on the manual control ring. Probably not going to happen. I love my G16 but want a pivoting touch screen. I do find it hard to justify the US $500+ difference in price between the cameras for my needs. Is the OVF the same on both cameras?
4:50 awesome shot and color grade in this scene
It can be a great option for people who don't know about photography/cameras, walk into a best buy and ask for a good all around camera and the sales guy who knows slightly more recommends this because it's a point and shoot with a big sensor........
Mr P: And weather sealing. And an EVF. And a hot shoe. And a leaf shutter.
Do you have any idea when you might get a video out on the GH5s
Just a year later and this camera is on sale now for $1299 on Canon's Canada e-store.
Guess they didn't sell that many.
Hey Chris. Nice review, however, as a 100% stills guy, this review seemed to play to the video capabilities (or lack thereof). Regarding your comparison to the G5, you forgot to mention that the larger APS-C sensor of the G1 mark III would allow for greater sharpness and detail retention in very large poster prints. As a primarily Fuji X-System (X-T3) landscape and product shooter, my main criterion for this "travel" camera is lens sharpness, detail rendition, and overall image quality in still photography, for when traveling to areas in which I prefer not to take my X-T3, i.e., very infrequent beach photography. This G1 Mark III seems to fit my criteria, and I understand is somewhat weather "resistant" as well! That said, if you have a better recommendation for my occassional foray to a beach/sand/ocean environment, please do let me know. Thanks!
Thanks guys another nice review.
I really like that body design, and what a great sensor to cram into it
Combined with shit lens
Great review! Covered all the right points. 👍
I own a Canon 200D with Sigma 18-35 lens, I only do photography (no video). While I'm happy with the quality of the images, it is quite not a convenient combo to use because it is big and heavy and I'm traveling all the time. It is therefore necessary to somehow plan to make a photo session with a backpack etc. and the whole is really not discreet when you want to do street photography for example.
It is not the type of combo you bring with you when going to the restaurant or stuff like that.
I am therefore looking for a high quality camera that is versatile, but above all that I could have everywhere with me, for example to take improvised pictures in the beautiful streets of Tokyo or elsewhere, without being too much noticed.
The main interest of this camera for me is to have aps-c quality sensor, with a quality lens, easy to carry and discreet.
The best camera is the one you have with you they say
So what if I said, I want a fairly versatile camera for travel (mostly urban - city visits but some landscapes too) and I want small (I have traveled with my DSLR and mirrorless and I just don't want the bother. The smaller the better but the most important issue is image quality - I like to print some of my travel pics in large sizes. I know that the Sony RX1 or Leica's will likely have better quality but I'm OK with G1X iii price but that's about the limit (although there does seem to be a few RX1's used out there for about the same money as a new G1X iii). It seems like the G1X iii is it. When comparing the G1X iii to the G5X a dpreviews image comparator the G1X iii looks sharper. The G7X ii looks closer to the G1X iii for picture quality??? Am I missing something?
Great video! at first, was planning to buy G7X Mark II but also had my eyes on the G5X much more. I was waiting for this camera if it is worth it. since this review, I think I will go for the G5X. what about you guys there ?
G5X or G1X Mark III ?
Which one did you get?
It's great to have an APSC sensor, but it's basically for daylight shots but the fact that it has a slow lens(f2.8-5.6) makes me apprehensive about its low light capabilities.
It's a daylight camera for snap shooters on vacation that don't want to carry the DSLR. Travel photographers might like it, but honestly an RX100 or RX10 would serve them better.
RufusLeakin: There is something you can attach to the hot shoe to help you with low light. On the other hand, I have no idea how the AF is in low light, though.
Wouldn't the GX1 ii be better in this case with the faster lens and longer reach? I think the review on that was pretty harsh.
Will the G-1x mark III produce the same image quality as a M-6 with a 15-45 kit lens?
HEY CHRIS and JORDAN , which one will you recommend for mostly stills photography... canon80d or sony a6300 or nikon d7500 in 2018
Mingmar Lama: I think the answer to your question comes down primarily to the debate over mirrorless vs. DSLR.
Harvey Louis i like both mirrorless and dslr.. so it doesnt matter for me... i love both ..
Go with the Nikon D7500 if you want the best low light capabilities. At high ISOs, it will give you much cleaner images than the other two. Canon's APS-C cameras are not that good in lowlight. They produce very grainy, noisy images at high ISOs. Even the entry-level Nikon D3400 produces cleaner images than the Canon 80D at high ISOs. The Sony A6300 is also good but the Nikon D7500 is still better. Here's a comparison between the three cameras at ISO 6400 including the Nikon D3400 at DPreview: bit.ly/2CXD4JX
i have g1x mark3 this camera but shocked that you doesn't recommend this camera in last. yes lens is most weak point of this camera comparing this sensor, could you recommend another camera model which has similar size with g1x mark3?
Which camera are you recording the review on?
Does anyone know if you have full manual control options when shooting video with this G1X Mark III? Can you completely control shutter speed, aperture, ISO, and white balance?
Yup!
Jordan @ TCSTV
Much appreciated!
What do you think about the Panasonic ZS100 vs that Sony.
Great. I appreciate the G5X vs G1X comparison.
Nice review..planning a nice 21day tour of beautiful Canada (from east to west) in in a few weeks from The Netherlands.. thinking if my iphone 6 with a gimbal would be enough..
Or if i should invest in to a gimbal with the Sony RX100 6.. looking at possible alternatives..Any tips would be very welcome..For a noob the world of camera's is pretty overwhelming to say the least.. hahah
Curious how the final images compare to the Ricoh GR3 at the wide open end (2.8 24mm).
Great review to the point!
Any info on possible tele converter?
Hello and thank you for this Test. And now = G1X MIII or G5X MII. Which is the best for Photography ?
G5XII has much more reach and faster lens. The actual lens is 44mm vs 45mm (2.8 vs 5.6), that tells us how much it collects light regardless of sensor size. It's also smaller and lighter with less controls. G1X has better IQ in good light, bigger sensor and resolution. Overall G1X is slagging because it's lens is so bad.
@@kiisseli1337 thank you very much for your answer
@Chris how do you like the cosyspeed bag?
Christian Plath I like them a lot although this was the first time I wore it as Intended, As a belt. I usually throw it over my shoulder which works but somewhat akwardly.
Chris@TCSTV
Very helpful review...thanks guys...
Enjoyable review, and I really like the video shot at 9:00 minutes in, only lasts a few seconds but is pretty cool.
I'm Nikon shooter and I enjoy your every single camera review Chris, I use D750 and D7500 and waiting for D750 successor and review of it on your channel :)
Good honest and helpful. Thank you.
@TheCameraStore A great review as usual. I’m also curious to know who makes that light grey fanny pack. It looks very practical. Does anyone know? Thanks
Great analysis! Thank you
Very interesting, the comparison with the G5X. I’ve been campaigning for a year for a Mark 2 that would have the same processor and sensor improvements as the G7X Mk 2, plus the essential mic input for vloggers. If space is the problem, get rid of the unnecessary remote socket (use the app!). Would be a nigh-perfect compact - 4K if you must, although I could live without it. I would buy one - and I have a M5!