Soyuz MS-17 docking th-cam.com/video/fhgrtKRqNVo/w-d-xo.html Soyuz MS-17 hatch opening th-cam.com/video/3bXh6u_YCzE/w-d-xo.html Roscosmos Роскосмос th-cam.com/play/PLpGTA7wMEDFj6UChGp8ODnk9uh18e3Z5X.html International Space Station th-cam.com/play/PLpGTA7wMEDFjV3rHufRlA_0vdSQFL9a40.html Commercial Crew Program th-cam.com/play/PLpGTA7wMEDFiap99WjXq8JTpFOh0AUNy_.html
@@gregorymalchuk272 Yeah. It's named after Sergei Korolev. He designed the original version of this rocket back in the 50's. Dude was like a one man NASA.
@@ant4812 I presume he had some help 😉, but yes, he was a genius rocket designer that gave the USSR their initial lead in the Space Race that they otherwise might not have had. Such was his importance that Soviet leaders were always afraid that he would be assassinated, so at the time he worked in secret, and his unfortunate early death (from routine surgery, if I remember correctly, as well as heart disease) dealt a huge blow to the Soviet manned lunar program.
I'd feel the safest in a Soyuz spacecraft, currently, but the Soyuz rocket, while very reliable for a rocket, isn't quite as reliable as some others, such as the Falcon 9 and Atlas V.
@@KD10Conqueror In what way? The Falcon 9 first stage can fly many times, which seems to suggest that it is pretty robust. And its current run of 122 consecutive successful missions (counting both manned and unmanned) is already better than the Soyuz can usually do. The Soyuz's current run is 69 successful missions in a row, and the number is most often lower than that over its history. Its highest reliability was achieved during the 1980s and 1990s, with runs of 133 and 146, so it still holds the record for now, but those two runs are far and away the best it has achieved. Over most of its history, there is usually another failure after less than 50 launches since the last one. Most these days involve the upper stages, but every so often those four boosters attached to the core stage cause failures. Don't get me wrong, the Soyuz rocket is one of the most reliable in history, but it is not unbeatable in this respect, and lately it has been a bit less reliable than it was in the 1990s. The Falcon 9 is not only approaching the Soyuz's records from its heyday, it has done so with first stages that have flown multiple times (two have flown more than 10 times now).
Soviet Russia's engineering was always Russian and now or in the what can do other Soviet republics in the space nothing if this its are ussr all republics power and engineering why they can't do something in space only Russia can like usa and China , Russia build in Soviet republics institutes and taught engineers like koroliov he was from Ukraine he was ethnic Russian he became scientist in Moscow - now this technology only called old name souz but in reality this is new technology nothing have with old Soviet-Russia's age technology .
Thanks, Roscosmos for lowering voices at every launch broadcast so we don't have to hear those uninteresting, "Lift-off! Lift-off! Lift-off! We have lift-off! Lift-off! Lift-off! XXX carrying YYY for blablabla".
3 hours! From earth to the ISS! And a slim rocket means a slim budget too. now that's some good cost saving measures. Cause the fater the rocket the bigger the budget.
If politicians did not interfere, NASA and Roscosmos could jointly achieve significantly greater results. It remains to be hoped that the society will quickly get rid of the political cancer.
It's actually 1950s technology, but if it works, it works. And truth be told, rocket technology hasn't advanced very much since the late 1960s. Many people seem to assume that it would have advanced just as much as, say, computers or televisions, but that is simply not the case, for a variety of reasons.
No siempre se muestran imagenes donde se vea la estrella de Korolev , es una pena que las camaras en superficie no hayan tenido el lente para ver el hemocionante momento cuando lineas de condensación marcan el MAX-Q , el momento de mayor carga dinamica , cuando la G se vuelve realmente fuerte .
@Scinews I have a question- does the whole propulsion rocket separates after reaching some altitude and falls on the earth after that? which means this is all for one-time usage (except of course the Soyuz capsule itself) and needs to be manufactured again for the next mission? Or is there any part that remains operational?
It can be painted differently sometimes. The last Soyuz-FG being assembled th-cam.com/video/pGyU9UPYIyg/w-d-xo.html The first Soyuz-2.1a to launch a crew th-cam.com/video/zfvJDllNjlY/w-d-xo.html
I'm a bit baffled by how the launch escape tower is jettisoned before the side boosters Seperate. I'm pretty sure we've all seen the mission where the seperation didn't go according to plan and there was an abort. Shouldn't the tower stay on til at least a few seconds after booster sep for similar cases?
At that altitude, the capsule can detach itself from the rocket and safely descend with the parachute. Just as it happened th-cam.com/users/SciNewsRosearch?query=Soyuz+MS-10
America has not launched anything into orbit for two decades. They rent Russian Soyz Rockets. And ain't that a surprise.... The nation that landed on the moon needs to rent rockets to get to orbit from their enemy nation now... Mhmm... ;)
This rocket worked for Gagarin and continues to work today. Definitely the safest and most reliable. However i feel the future belongs to reusable rockets and spacecraft.
@MrWantsoft ну по факту картинка на моём мобильном лучше, но я не сравниваю с ним есть те же gopro, но я часто смотрю трансляции с запуском starlink картинка на порядок выше, если что никого не хотел обидеть
Még mindig az a nyerő, ha egyszerre 25 kis hajtómű dolgozik. Ha kettő-három leáll, a többi simán felviszi a cuccot. // The winner is still when 25 small engines are working at the same time. If two or three stop, the others will pick up the stuff smoothly.
I am pretty sure when (and if) the soyus gets retired space nerds will be rioting in the streets verywhere, truly an icon of spcaeflight. Also fun fact this october 14th (the day of the launch) was Kathleen Rubins 42 birthday.
@@alexeikolokolcev3232 nice! Thank you for replying. First noticed last mission, i believe when they aborted, and had to land. People can say whatever they want about Soyuz... yet, i don't believe anyone has ever been killed as a result of the craft. And that system is i believe older than I am. 😁 ☀️😎☀️ 🇺🇸🤝🇷🇺 ☀️😎☀️
@SciNews, you are too slow this time! When you have posted this launch video the Soyuz MS-17 was already docked to ISS :) 05:45:04.536 UTC -> 08:48:45 UTC = 03:03:41 And when I'm writing this comment, they are already inside ISS :)
Gary St Ну я про него узнала относительно недавно, например. Доброе утро, что называется, новости люди ныне черпают самостоятельно из интернетов. Соответсвенно живут в своих информационных матрицах, вполне нормально, когда новостная информационная повестка у двух людей может не совпадать практически полностью. Точнее на самом деле оно так и есть, если взять нормальное распределение и посмотреть какие новости потребляют люди, там пересечение будет не сильно большое, а у части людей вообще не будет пересечений, они натурально живут в разных мирах, хотя это могут быть соседние квартиры. Вот например я знаю что этот канал показывает разные новости, я на него не подписана, иностранные космические программы меня не интересуют от слова совсем, поэтому ютуб научился мне рекомендовать видео с данного канала только про российские пуски. Вот как сейчас это он сделал. Я зашла, посмотрела, и так до следующего раза. Для сравнения я не смотрела ни одно видео с ракетами маска, ну какие-то кусочки видела конечно, но как часть новостных сюжетов. Кто такой маск запомнила раза с десятого наверное, ибо в новостях натыкалась конечно, но мозг всегда отсеивал эту информацию как ненужную (аналогично несколько раз читала про китайских ракетоделов, но вот хоть убей ни одного уже не помню, мозг отсеивает ненужное), запомнила его уже когда в комментах у роскосмоса/рогозина (твиттер) его продвигало какое-то невероятное количество ботов и пришлось тратить несколько часов чтобы изучить что стоит за этой пропагандисткой кампанией.
Soyuz MS-17 docking th-cam.com/video/fhgrtKRqNVo/w-d-xo.html
Soyuz MS-17 hatch opening th-cam.com/video/3bXh6u_YCzE/w-d-xo.html
Roscosmos Роскосмос th-cam.com/play/PLpGTA7wMEDFj6UChGp8ODnk9uh18e3Z5X.html
International Space Station th-cam.com/play/PLpGTA7wMEDFjV3rHufRlA_0vdSQFL9a40.html
Commercial Crew Program th-cam.com/play/PLpGTA7wMEDFiap99WjXq8JTpFOh0AUNy_.html
Nice Korolev cross this time. I never get tired of watching Soyuz launches.
What's that? The scene when the boosters blow off and look like a cross.
@@gregorymalchuk272 Yeah. It's named after Sergei Korolev. He designed the original version of this rocket back in the 50's. Dude was like a one man NASA.
@@ant4812 I presume he had some help 😉, but yes, he was a genius rocket designer that gave the USSR their initial lead in the Space Race that they otherwise might not have had. Such was his importance that Soviet leaders were always afraid that he would be assassinated, so at the time he worked in secret, and his unfortunate early death (from routine surgery, if I remember correctly, as well as heart disease) dealt a huge blow to the Soviet manned lunar program.
If I had to choose one type of rocket to take me into orbit it'd definitely be a Soyuz. Amazing safety record and great reliability
I'd feel the safest in a Soyuz spacecraft, currently, but the Soyuz rocket, while very reliable for a rocket, isn't quite as reliable as some others, such as the Falcon 9 and Atlas V.
Falcon 9 heavy for me.
In the early days of the Soviet space program all launches were conducted in secret. There was a reason for that.
@@randybaumery5090 and soon starship
@@Sputnick_00 I hope so.
Looks like a beautiful sword in the sky. God bless the soul of the soyuz designers. Built in 60s and still serving the mankind.
Originally meant to destroy us
@@makssachs8914 that was R7
@@technoglobe1168 Nearly the same rocket, just different payload.
@@makssachs8914 Atlas Agena was same at NASA
@@technoglobe1168 Well it was meant to destroy them.
I'm gonna miss that Tulip design of Soyuz when it retires :(
Не скучай на подходе Союз 5. Don't get bored on the approach of Soyuz 5.
@@ОлегОлегов-ц9й Soyuz 5 and 6 won't have the tulip shaped nozzles
Will never retire
@@steren700 I hope so but it will
We all can agree that Soyuz rocket design is really pretty
Beautiful launch of a great icon in space exploration. Really impressive machine!
Congratulations to ROSCOSMOS and Russian federation Indian gaganyan mission crew is training on Russia and thank you for this you are supporting india
from Russia with love )
Each space mission objectives, is to serve human mankind. Best wishes
Well said.
:) much love
5:20 Korolev cross
never tired of seeing that
Молодцы ребят и спасибо за труд !
Soyuz rocket is so beautiful. Thanks for this amazing video.
3 hours and 3 mins from earth to the ISS on this bad ass rocket.....wow!
cette fusée est toujours aussi magnifique, bravo les Russes
Very utilitarian. But gets the job done. Greetings Russian 🇷🇺 friends from California. 🇺🇸
Are American friend of Russian?
Beautiful rocket.
Everyone is friends.
Greetings! Let's do it together, for a bright future 🙌
@@kazungukaviha5796 just for show...
@@Shoorit really? I don't think so , and if it's true friendly then oneday there will be friendship of a hyena and gazzel
The most robust and elegant rocket ever built.
Agreed. SpaceX wont be able to beat this.
@@KD10Conqueror In what way? The Falcon 9 first stage can fly many times, which seems to suggest that it is pretty robust. And its current run of 122 consecutive successful missions (counting both manned and unmanned) is already better than the Soyuz can usually do. The Soyuz's current run is 69 successful missions in a row, and the number is most often lower than that over its history. Its highest reliability was achieved during the 1980s and 1990s, with runs of 133 and 146, so it still holds the record for now, but those two runs are far and away the best it has achieved. Over most of its history, there is usually another failure after less than 50 launches since the last one. Most these days involve the upper stages, but every so often those four boosters attached to the core stage cause failures.
Don't get me wrong, the Soyuz rocket is one of the most reliable in history, but it is not unbeatable in this respect, and lately it has been a bit less reliable than it was in the 1990s. The Falcon 9 is not only approaching the Soyuz's records from its heyday, it has done so with first stages that have flown multiple times (two have flown more than 10 times now).
Russian POWER! Good luck!
This is Soviet engineering.
And its last time the U.S. is using it also
Soviet Russia's engineering was always Russian and now or in the what can do other Soviet republics in the space nothing if this its are ussr all republics power and engineering why they can't do something in space only Russia can like usa and China , Russia build in Soviet republics institutes and taught engineers like koroliov he was from Ukraine he was ethnic Russian he became scientist in Moscow - now this technology only called old name souz but in reality this is new technology nothing have with old Soviet-Russia's age technology .
@@warleyfdias SpaceX has done over a hundred f9 launches
@@warleyfdias everything is automated the only difference is that there's people inside instead of satellites, same rocket, same tech, same everything
How far we could reach as human specie, if work together instead of fighting each other without a real enemy among us. Greetings from Colombia.
fighting each other brought us the rocket
@@tommylee4135 well that is true
That won't work. Unless GOD brainwashes us. If a God would do that, your request is granted.
@@tommylee4135 No. The modern liquid-fuel rocket was developed by Robert Goddard.
Normal day in Russia
regular work for decades
15 rub
technically it's Kazakstan, but okay
@@yaplakal4088 You respond to the Prigogine bot
@@yaplakal4088 Байконур в аренде у России. Казахстан - партнер России по военно-техническому сотрудничеству, член евразийского экономического союза.
Gooo Soyuz
Thanks, Roscosmos for lowering voices at every launch broadcast so we don't have to hear those uninteresting, "Lift-off! Lift-off! Lift-off! We have lift-off! Lift-off! Lift-off! XXX carrying YYY for blablabla".
Also I think if you referred to the crew as "our space dads" you go gulag right away.
for Roscosmos , this does not exist, for them it is a normal job, and not PR like Elon musk.
@@carlsaischa
They will also stop giving vodka and take the bear. I don’t know which is worse.
3 часа Карл
A melhor nave aeroespacial já feita!
i saw this at live. it was beautiful.
Счастливого пути!
Стыковка Союз МС-17 th-cam.com/video/fhgrtKRqNVo/w-d-xo.html
3 hours! From earth to the ISS! And a slim rocket means a slim budget too. now that's some good cost saving measures. Cause the fater the rocket the bigger the budget.
Humanity's efforts in space are far more powerful than the mere political tensions on Earth.
THAT LOOKED SO COOL
Only 3 hours 3 minutes .it takes more time from Delhi to Moscow 6h35min.
Молодцы!
ङ
Soyuz... what a legend
So clean and masterized
Great to see a successful flight.
If politicians did not interfere, NASA and Roscosmos could jointly achieve significantly greater results. It remains to be hoped that the society will quickly get rid of the political cancer.
Sergey Pavlovich, thank you!
Я как раз весной с вахты приеду,и они прилетят.Они молодцы,я молодец!! )))
I love Russia.. from India
5:50 most interesting part from soyuz
Good choice for leaving the earth
LMAO
I gotta say launch commentators are so relaxing
Working together is better than fighting but we humans are still very clanish
Russian tech always fascinates me.
Wow! How much time Soyuz will take to reach International Space Station?
Please tell me
3 hours and 3 minutes th-cam.com/video/fhgrtKRqNVo/w-d-xo.html
Gotta love the 60's technology
If it ain't broke, don't fix it
It's actually 1950s technology, but if it works, it works. And truth be told, rocket technology hasn't advanced very much since the late 1960s. Many people seem to assume that it would have advanced just as much as, say, computers or televisions, but that is simply not the case, for a variety of reasons.
2:56 beautiful flame, beautiful rocket. That could make for an amazing screensaver :)
No siempre se muestran imagenes donde se vea la estrella de Korolev , es una pena que las camaras en superficie no hayan tenido el lente para ver el hemocionante momento cuando lineas de condensación marcan el MAX-Q , el momento de mayor carga dinamica , cuando la G se vuelve realmente fuerte .
Soyuz rockets are beauty with power personified.
Work horse for Russia great technology still in use old is gold love from India
So what... USA was first on the Moon!! Why cant they use their technology?... Oh...
@@Morra5472
Because it’s expensive. Duh.
@Scinews I have a question- does the whole propulsion rocket separates after reaching some altitude and falls on the earth after that? which means this is all for one-time usage (except of course the Soyuz capsule itself) and needs to be manufactured again for the next mission? Or is there any part that remains operational?
Yes.
@@SciNewsRo So do they store like couple of rockets prepared to be used anytime or need to produce them once 3 months?
@@rainywizard 11 Soyuz rockets were launched in 2020 th-cam.com/play/PLpGTA7wMEDFj6UChGp8ODnk9uh18e3Z5X.html
What the different about Soyuz-Fg and Soyuz 2.1A?
Analog vs. digital flight control and telemetry systems.
wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz-FG
wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz-2
@@SciNewsRo thanks. I see
@@SciNewsRo is there any different about the outer visual or is just upgraded?
It can be painted differently sometimes.
The last Soyuz-FG being assembled th-cam.com/video/pGyU9UPYIyg/w-d-xo.html
The first Soyuz-2.1a to launch a crew th-cam.com/video/zfvJDllNjlY/w-d-xo.html
I see
Best wishes for you all, guys!
Wow, and I thought the economy seats on the plane are tight
Excellent rocket engine
It's interesting how what I assume is a different fuel changes the whole personality of a craft. No launch trails unlike American launches.
Russian rockets are beautiful
I'm a bit baffled by how the launch escape tower is jettisoned before the side boosters Seperate. I'm pretty sure we've all seen the mission where the seperation didn't go according to plan and there was an abort. Shouldn't the tower stay on til at least a few seconds after booster sep for similar cases?
At that altitude, the capsule can detach itself from the rocket and safely descend with the parachute. Just as it happened th-cam.com/users/SciNewsRosearch?query=Soyuz+MS-10
The fairings have escape motors
Sojusz doleciał na stację kosmicznom❤
the lift off process of Soyuz is much more dignified and seamless whereas American rockets are more loud and dramatic
America has not launched anything into orbit for two decades. They rent Russian Soyz Rockets. And ain't that a surprise.... The nation that landed on the moon needs to rent rockets to get to orbit from their enemy nation now... Mhmm... ;)
@@Morra5472
Huh? What are you talking about? Have you just ignored SpaceX and ULA? No NASA payload has launched on a Russian rocket since 2018.
I thought this video was 5 to 10 years old
You missed the new part th-cam.com/video/fhgrtKRqNVo/w-d-xo.html
SUPER ,, RUSIA "....
This rocket worked for Gagarin and continues to work today. Definitely the safest and most reliable. However i feel the future belongs to reusable rockets and spacecraft.
That’s a clean take off unlike American rockets....
What is supposedly not "clean" about American rocket takeoffs?
Круто!!!
What a monster of a rocket
Wspaniałe!!! :)
Даже видео такого качества как будто камеры не развивались с конца 80 х годов...
@MrWantsoft ну по факту картинка на моём мобильном лучше, но я не сравниваю с ним есть те же gopro, но я часто смотрю трансляции с запуском starlink картинка на порядок выше, если что никого не хотел обидеть
@@ДмитрийШураков-л3у GoPro в этих условиях откажет на первой минуте.
Még mindig az a nyerő, ha egyszerre 25 kis hajtómű dolgozik. Ha kettő-három leáll, a többi simán felviszi a cuccot. // The winner is still when 25 small engines are working at the same time. If two or three stop, the others will pick up the stuff smoothly.
They are real heroes
3:20 Поехали!
All the best
Soyuz powerful Rocket of Roscosmos Great Technology by Russia 👌👌🔥🔥🔥🔥
How did you get to this video? It's from 2020.
باي باي صديق متى يرجع انتا😢💔
we got a lift off
can you imagine there`s a Saturn 5 at the pad lifting off ....
Serguéi Pávlovich Koroliov 💞
Toda vez que seu anúncio interrompe o meu vídeo, só me faz pegar raiva do seu produto.
Rußland ist großartig !!!👍👍👍🇷🇺
Both sergey looks very similar
I am pretty sure when (and if) the soyus gets retired space nerds will be rioting in the streets verywhere, truly an icon of spcaeflight. Also fun fact this october 14th (the day of the launch) was Kathleen Rubins 42 birthday.
Soyuz MS-17 hatch opening th-cam.com/video/3bXh6u_YCzE/w-d-xo.html
Yep. We lost the Space Shuttle but please not Союз!
Is it customary to knee the cosmonaut in the butt before ascending the stairs?
I noticed that every time.
😲😂😂
☀️😎☀️🇺🇸🤝🇷🇺
Yes. Tradition for luck. Kick to the orbite.
@@alexeikolokolcev3232 nice! Thank you for replying. First noticed last mission, i believe when they aborted, and had to land.
People can say whatever they want about Soyuz... yet, i don't believe anyone has ever been killed as a result of the craft. And that system is i believe older than I am.
😁
☀️😎☀️ 🇺🇸🤝🇷🇺 ☀️😎☀️
If you look at the first spacesuits, you will understand where the tradition came from)
@@НиколайНикакоюс-л2ь that's cool , thanks for sharing that.
☀️😎☀️
@@d.cypher2920
Yes, in this way they helped to rise)
3:20, кто-то сказал "Поехали!" :)
仕事が早い
@SciNews, you are too slow this time! When you have posted this launch video the Soyuz MS-17 was already docked to ISS :)
05:45:04.536 UTC -> 08:48:45 UTC = 03:03:41 And when I'm writing this comment, they are already inside ISS :)
Not true, check the time here twitter.com/SciNewsRo/status/1316259990538256385
Good job
So cool without boosters! 👍
It do have boosters 🤣🤣
расслабься наслаждайся
It looks so fucking cool when it seperates from the boosters! Looks like a claw or something seeing it from earth!
the usual work of Russians for decades . without PR, presentations and shows..
да и верно, здесь нехуй показать миру, технологии каменого века.
That is true
You see, all that going to that space are all from the soviétic countries, then america we say we did...
Amazing machines ! Great Russia !
Great
Как вам это Маск ?
А кто это? маск?..
@@vitaliypolikarpov вот те на , дрэгоны и тэслы , не , не слышали )))
Gary St Ну я про него узнала относительно недавно, например. Доброе утро, что называется, новости люди ныне черпают самостоятельно из интернетов. Соответсвенно живут в своих информационных матрицах, вполне нормально, когда новостная информационная повестка у двух людей может не совпадать практически полностью. Точнее на самом деле оно так и есть, если взять нормальное распределение и посмотреть какие новости потребляют люди, там пересечение будет не сильно большое, а у части людей вообще не будет пересечений, они натурально живут в разных мирах, хотя это могут быть соседние квартиры.
Вот например я знаю что этот канал показывает разные новости, я на него не подписана, иностранные космические программы меня не интересуют от слова совсем, поэтому ютуб научился мне рекомендовать видео с данного канала только про российские пуски. Вот как сейчас это он сделал. Я зашла, посмотрела, и так до следующего раза. Для сравнения я не смотрела ни одно видео с ракетами маска, ну какие-то кусочки видела конечно, но как часть новостных сюжетов. Кто такой маск запомнила раза с десятого наверное, ибо в новостях натыкалась конечно, но мозг всегда отсеивал эту информацию как ненужную (аналогично несколько раз читала про китайских ракетоделов, но вот хоть убей ни одного уже не помню, мозг отсеивает ненужное), запомнила его уже когда в комментах у роскосмоса/рогозина (твиттер) его продвигало какое-то невероятное количество ботов и пришлось тратить несколько часов чтобы изучить что стоит за этой пропагандисткой кампанией.
@@vitaliypolikarpov Это певец! Он поёт "Трава у дома"!😆
@@АртурРябко-в6ю , трава у дома... Теперь понятно, почему он все.время улыбается..
3 .. 2 .. 1 .. ЛИФТОФФ!
lol i just used translate
Glad I can read it lol liftoff
Wish they had cool footage as in the SpaceX rocket launches.! Beautiful rocket
Soyouz looks way more beautiful
Sản phẩm của những bộ óc vĩ đại
05:20 Korolev cross
Советские инженеры всё же были супер профессионалами своего дела. Жаль что сейчас мы так сильно отстаём в развитии технологий
Союз МС-17 самый быстрый полет к МКС th-cam.com/video/fhgrtKRqNVo/w-d-xo.html
В космических технологиях мы пока не отстаёт но это пока! А вот финансирование и грамотное распределение средств и ресурсов это да
Got to hand it to those Russians. They do make a cool looking rocket.
oh yeah
👍👏