*Soyuz MS-10 onboard camera view* th-cam.com/video/h1bCikeXFcA/w-d-xo.html Launch of Soyuz MS-10 th-cam.com/video/CnQlj73NIm4/w-d-xo.html International Space Station th-cam.com/play/PLpGTA7wMEDFjV3rHufRlA_0vdSQFL9a40.html Roscosmos th-cam.com/play/PLpGTA7wMEDFj6UChGp8ODnk9uh18e3Z5X.html
It became a safe ship after they lost an entire crew. Soyuz used went up with three cosmonauts that weren't able to wear their pressure suits he has a spacecraft was too small. There was a fire in a valve in equalisation valve and their blood boil before they got too the chutes opening.in the course of the redesigned they removed one seat in the capsule thus making it safe.
@@JohnRodriguesPhotographer He is talking about the rocket, you are making false statemens about the capsule. Soyuz-MS has 3 seats en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_MS You are thinking of a different capsule Soyuz 7K-OKS en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_11
No matter your views on Russia, you have to admire how after the shuttles were retired, the Russians knew they could end every Western country’s human space flight program if they kept Soyuz to themselves. But they didn’t and chose to share Soyuz, which is impressive considering how absurdly ridiculous the idea of Russian cosmonauts and western astronauts flying together was just a few decades ago.
It was not a direct flight Soyuz triggered self destruct and the faring pulled them away just as it blew up. In the event the rocket blows up the crew need to make an emergency landing and their backups must prepare for immediate launch. This is the second time Soyuz had a launch abort the first time Vladimir Titov and Gennadi Strekalov lifted off in Soyuz 7K and the rocket blew up on the same pad that Soyuz MS 10 just launched from. Titov pulled the abort handle and as designed the escape tower fired and they landed 30 miles away in Drezkadan.
Pretty certain they didn't see 18Gs as that would likely be deadly. Reports are saying somewhere between 7 and 10 Gs. Published data for the ballistic reentry says it would be somewhere above 8Gs.
One of the few times a failure was a great success. To have this catastrophic failure and not have loss of crew is absolutely outstanding and is a testament to the Russian's steadfast commitment their tried and true launch system.
@@popwarner8029 uh a few things. 1: How does that relate to any of the comments being deleted? 2: HOW DUMB ARE YOU? How is a SPACE PLANE that has a REALLY SMALL hybrid rocket motor NOT reaching space (unless you live in the US) mean spaceflight is impossible?!? Do you even know what a rocket is or is the entirety of your space knowledge Branson's plane? Because what rockets do is instead of using wings they use these things called rocket engines that use a mix of liquid oxygen and a liquid fuel (hydrogen, methane, RP1, etc.) which using newtons 3rd law can propel themselves on the ground, 52 miles up, and in a vacuum. And yes, newtons 3rd law still works in a vacuum. Before you say it doesn't, look at the dozens of videos of people who light a solid rocket motor in a vacuum chamber and then it moves. Not as much as in air but that's because it wasn't designed to be fired in a vacuum. That's why their are sea-level engines and vacuum engines, for efficiency!
@@BPS298 Good Answer Mr Peanut. Ignore the idiots, they stew in a pot of misinformation while the rest of us get excited about new space missions. Did you see Starship stacking? My word that is going to be epic.
Yeah that's what i'm seeing the headline is here. Seems the forces involved there must be a tiny margin for error and it's remarkable when a mission goes 100%. We're trying to go into frickin space for cryin out loud. I'm surprised these things don't blow up every other time. Expensive as hell tho. These missions maybe will make space travel in the future closer to routine.
As much as this sucks for the mission, it’s still a major success in my book. Everyone returned safely and everything performed roughly as it should, given the contingency. The rules of aviation/space travel are written in blood and we’ve learned many tragic lessons throughout the decades. It’s good to see that all of that sacrifice is starting to pay off for the next generation of astronauts/cosmonauts/etc.
Just thought I’d mention that Alexei Ovchinin’s first words after emerging from the Soyuz capsule after this failure were as he turned to Nick Hague “Well, that was a short trip”.
Rockets fail, they by their nature are dangerous machines, nice to see the Russians built a great back up escape feature, and it work to thank God, two brave men returned to earth safely
@@SparrowNoblePoland Rocket's by their design are highly volatile machines, Soyuz is no different than the Saturn V, or the rockets that put the US space shuttle into orbit, anything can go wrong, it just take on oh-shit by a technician and it turns into a giant fire works display.
The tower is just *one component* of the emergency escape system. The system continues to function all the way to orbit, using different sets of engines on the fairing and the ship itself.
You are correct, the tower was jettisoned and was not involved in this abort scenario. But the tower is not the emergency escape system. it is only one set of the emergency escape system engines which are used for abort in the earliest stages of the flight and on the ground. There are also engines on the ship and on the fairing. Depending on the phase of flight, emergency escape system operates by different means. But it continues to function all the way to the orbit.
So sorry to hear about the failure, but glad the systems in place worked as designed. The Soyuz has a very awesome track record, glad to see the safety mechanisms worked as designed!
Soyuz has been operating for over 20+ years......Falcon 9 barely ten and they land the entire first stage.......2019....Falcon 9 has crew dragon. Two separate rockets on complete separate timelines. You can’t compare.
Russia : "Failure of the booster. Emergency separation" NASA : "Everything is going well. Soyuz is on its way to space" Well... Journalists reading their scripts.
The only people that do not make mistakes are the people that do not do things. It’s unfortunate the rocket launch did not go well but great job on the launch recovery system. It is the first failed launch that I’ve seen where the people we’re alive afterwards.
Neoptolemus nothing about Rockets are particularly safe. I would have no problem trusting a System designed 40 years ago that just shows that it was designed well. if you’ve ever flown in airplane you trusting system designed at least 40 years ago with the exceptions of engines commercial airliners have changed very little.
The NASA lady doing the audio was reading from her script without paying any attention to what the Russian lady was reporting real time. Once again, JSC at their finest...
I'm sure there are strict PR rules that constrain the "NASA lady". If anything appears to go wrong, predetermined rules come into effect. Some "suits" decide what the public gets to hear.
"One minute fifteen seconds. Velocity 2900 feet per second, altitude 9 nautical miles, downrange distance 7 nautical miles..." -- PAO @ STS-51-L two seconds after the orbiter exploded. These people don't get the same data feed we do, they can only talk about what they actually have in front of them. And they try hard not to be distracted.
@@k311ydcart3r You don't know what you're talking about. This is the fundamental difference between NASA and Soviet/Russian programs. NASA always has provided a live launch feed and a live feed of air-to-ground radio. The Soviets and Russians do not. Every time there's a launch or a spacewalk or a major ISS activity, NASA TV will show it live. NASA makes it a point to always be open with their activities to gain the support of Congress and the American public.
What a fantastic channel! Scientific news straight to the point, no ads nor annoying people talking too much, and going straight from the sources! Keep up the great work!
Amazing. As citizens from the US and citizens from Russia, we may have disagreements along the lines of our respected Federal governments. However, we cannot deny that we share a history of innovation and creativity when it comes to science and engineering. Cheers!
Congrats Russia and the thousands of Engineers and Technicians involved over the years. Another crew safely returned to Earth by the ever reliable Soyuz.
The Russian girl were translating the conversation of Russian MCC team. The NASA girl were reading the prepared text. Moreover, the animation of rocket flight was also prepared and lost any touch with reality since 3:53-3:55 (the moment of emergency separation).
So, can we conclude that the animation that is supposed to be based on real telemetry from the rocket, is in fact not based on real telemetry? Since the animation shows speed and altitude and plot-curves all normal?
It would be fine if the animation was pretenders, but the flight telemetry data was accurate. But if telemetry is just nominal, then that’s really weird.
It shows what is supposed to go for viewers to see something since they dont have cameras on it like spacex. Thats why the animation didnt have the error bec it was made ahead of time
This is a common misconception. The spire on the top of the rocket is the solid fuel engines for the flight abort system, and they are jettisoned relatively early in the flight (here it happened before the malfunction became apparent.) But the flight abort system is a much more comprehensive thing than just this engine unit -- it monitors the flight and uses different sets of hardware on the payload fairing and on the ship itself to save the crew in the event of booster malfunction throughout the flight.
WAUW I thought that when something would go wrong, the astronauts are dead. Amazing that there even are emergency "back to earth" possibities. And as the men are alrright, they have worked perfect. Amazing as the height and speed were really high already. Amazing outcome. Real great work by the designers and crators of this rocket system. My respect.
@@erepsekahs I think it would be not only difficult to accurately judge where the capsule might land, but also dangerous to be in the potential drop zone. Idk if anyone has literally seen a capsule drop in and cosmo/astronauts step out but then again it's not exactly something that happens very often. All that matter really is that it worked and they were safe.
Booster fail at 2:45 into the flight closely followed by the Soyuz (radio) recovery beacon sending AN in Morse code. Glad the recovery system worked as it should and the crew walked away. Go Soyuz!
@@sahilkate1061 Suggest you watch this again. Although I'm a licensed radio amateur, I'm pretty poor at reading Morse but it leapt out at me. VERY strong Morse.
I'm happy they're okay! Im just a regular person in awe of their efforts, and grateful for this channel. I wish I could get those guys a sammich and coffee, that's a rough work day. Wish I had that kind of composure, too.
Do you believe that we'd have thought you were special if you hadn't said otherwise? ;-D Test pilots who scream when they are in danger wash out early.
The correct intl. spelling is Kazakhstan, however, linguistically that's not matching the language. It should be Qazaqstan, according to national spelling Қазақстан, not Казахстан.
+ ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Hi ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) They STARTED from Kazakhstan, as Baikonour IS IN KAZAKHSTAN (I have been there 3 years ago). Kazakhstan was part of the former USSR (or Soviet Union or whatever you call it). It is the only Russian base outside of Russia. They invested so much in it, they were not going to build another launch-base on Russian ground.
It's kind of funny to see people bashing the Soyuz. Who designed their system so people can be safely recovered, versus who designed their system so people die (and have died)? This is actually very impressive.
@@howardsmith9342 People may have died in Soyuz spacecraft but no one has died during launch. Soyuz has always had an emergency escape system, in fact it has more than one. The Space Shuttle did not so, no, the Americans did not fix the problem - identified after Challenger explosion - and lost another crew on Columbia (for admittedly different reasons). If I were going into space right now the only rocket I would want under me is Soyuz.
@@thethirdman225 You are correct in that nobody has died during liftoff. In fact, the effectiveness of that escape system was proven recently. But people have died during reentry, and that is just as important as launch. Soyuz has been in service for a long time, and has proved itself.
Shows that emergency procedures and equipment can safely return crew to earth in the event of an aborted launch. Roscosmos cosmonaut Alexey Ovchinin and NASA astronaut Nick Hague have landed safely.
I am glad that cosmonaut Alexey Ovchinin and astronaut Nick Hague are safe! Space flights are always a risky business! Soyuz is a robust companion and this time everything went well!
For people saying BS about Soyuz, it's still holds record for safe crew flights. Boosters have probability of failure by 40% besides crew os safe, so all wasn't a failure unlike challenger. Besides you can do little with peanut size budget this rocket has already surpassed engine meeting challenges than NASA's massive budget.
The USSR/Russia has had its share of emergencies, too. Look up the Soyuz 18a/Soyuz 18-1 incident in 1975. Makarov and Lazarev had a very harrowing escape, and Lazarev suffered serious internal injuries that prevented him from flying again (and may have also shortened his life). Also look at the high-G reentry where the Soyuz failed to cleanly separate from the Service Module/PAO, the first of which happened to Soyuz 5 and later both Soyuz TMA-10 and TMA-11. Let's not forget Soyuz 1 and Soyuz 10, either. Space flight is highly unforgiving of the slightest error, no matter what nation is launching.
This is amazing! The fact that the escape tower was already jettisoned. There was an extra backup emergency system in place to create a ballistics trajectory for the crew's capsule to safely return. Both of the Astronauts/Comosnauts survived and unscathed. It's one of the safest and best rockets ever built. 😁🚀
After the accident, the crew behaves calmly and continues to work as if the rocket is flying normally. This is the confirmation that the preparation is going well ..
We witnessed a miracle today. Congratulations on a flawless recovery operation. Bummer about losing the mission and the down time for the investigation(s).
Failure can happen at any time. The best part is the support infrastructure of recovery and safety. The more the optional choice of recovery the better.
NYET, NYET!... *NYET!!!* Contract states "If US try INVADE Russia, Bear shall have UN approval for Russia providing *free service of blowing ENTIRE US into orbit in 30 minutes!"* THAT is why Trump always insist that US enter BAD Deals, for you guys cannot read small writing on Contracts!
It was great luck that the russian engineers decided to put a second launch escape system on the capsule. The failure occured, right after the first launch escape system had been jettisoned
Но как спокойно реагирует Овчинин. Вот уж воистину, стальные ... у человека. Ты летишь на границе космоса. 75 км над землёй. Под тобой десятки тонн считай взрывчатки. И машина, которая втащила тебя туда, мягко говоря, сломалась. Причем это "сломалась" может означать что угодно, от просто выключился двигатель, до разбора всего вокруг на атомы. А в эфир никакого "Ох @#&, ах :%* пи пи пи". "Авария носителя, да?" Понимаю, что их готовят к такому, но ведь это не тренажер. Тут ставки совсем другие. В общем, парни, снимаю шляпу!
I can't transmit the degree of my respect in english but the main idea: that guys are heroes with steel balls. They did' t demonstrate any emotions in very frightening situation when every next second may be the last one because the missle can demolish space aroun it to atoms. But we can't hear something like "WTF....". Nothing else than very calm messages.
Hashtag metoo within the first 20 seconds of the video. I'm glad these two made it out alive, it's easy to see why they consider rockets safer than the old space shuttle when it comes down to emergency landing. Could you imagine being Nick Hague on your first trip to space and then this happens... I think I would retire after that launch.
Every now and then I return to this video to remind myself that failure is in fact an option. The calmness, the deliberate actions of the crew and ground control staff, the orderly communication, it all points toward people who were prepared, people who unlike the NASA announcer weren't just going through the moves by rote. This mission was a success, A success made possible by preparedness and professionalism. In Vegas, in business, in spaceflight... If you don't understand how to fail as safely as possible you are in the wrong game.
It would have to be nerve wrecking as hell to pilot one of those things into perfect rendezvous with the station. Hats off to the brave men and women who do it and love it.
Lots of weird traditions and superstitions, peeing on the bus tire on the way to the launch pad etc... Everything that was done when Gagarin flew is done every time.
Was probably how they "motivated" Yuri to get on that thing (I wouldn't blame him for being a bit hesitant to get on something that has zero track record and incredibly lethal consequences for failure). Now it's TRADITION!
Hmm they might need to do a risk assessment before they injure a Cosmonaut right before a launch and have to abort. That would waste the millions of dollars and all the countless hours spent on training and preparation.
Given the current much less than friendly actions of USA+Israel+British governments, we can't exclude the chance they would share your optimism about crew surviving that...
Amazing. While the English-speaking Russian commentator is clearly describing a genuine flight emergency, the NASA commentator keeps calling out pre-scripted ascent updates. Then FINALLY at 8:12 -- after a protracted silence -- the NASA commentator chimes in with a walk-in-the-park no-big-deal reaction about an 'issue' with the booster. There is no reason to expect an overreaction -- but at least ditch the auto-pilot mode and narrate in a way that resembles a noticeable measure of concern.
They are obviously not hearing each other, and are possibly even on different continents. The NASA announcer simply commented on what was already shown on the screen -- the info-graphics prepared in advance, that was showing what was *supposed* to happen in a nominal launch. The Russian announcer was translating the communications between the ship and the ground in real time. European Space Agency also uses pre-prepared graphics. When the telemetry was lost in on of the flights earlier this year, they kept showing the altitude and velocity that were *supposed* to occur at a particular time, without knowing what was really happening.
My complaint is mostly about your point -- about listening to a script-reader with no sense of what is happening in real time. If *we* could hear the Russians -- why was the NASA narrator entirely unaware? The technical reason is obvious -- she was not hooked in. Why this happens makes no sense at all. Why have a narrator who is the last person on Earth to notice what is happening?
I agree that it was underwhelming and one could expect NASA to be able to do better. But apparently they can't. It seems like a simple thing to do, but in reality it is probably not so simple. Here we have a lady with a nice voice, probably sitting in a sound-booth somewhere in Houston, reading a simple, clear, vetted in advance script. To do better, one would need to find somebody actually quite knowledgeable about the launch process and the vehicle, who has time to do the commentary besides fulfilling whatever their main duty is, plus having the ability to do that in an engaging impromptu manner, plus (a huge hassle in practice!) having the OK from a bunch of managers who oversee these kinds of things. Look at the interviews Elon Musk gives. The guy is brilliant and really knows his stuff, but he is often painful to listen to, just because he does not have a talent for public speaking. SpaceX engineers chosen to do a running commentary for their launch webcasts are usually much better, but even they regularly say things that make no sense at all, just because it is really hard to do a coherent real time commentary.
@@kermitfrog3789 Doesn't matter, the frame of the shuttle never failed without a reason. The SRBs and the fact that NASA didn't really care about safety where dangerous.
Soyuz MS-10 onboard camera view th-cam.com/video/h1bCikeXFcA/w-d-xo.html Astronaut Nick Hague speaking about the Soyuz MS-10 launch th-cam.com/video/op7FHmEypxE/w-d-xo.html
Basically the same rocket over some sixty years, and it almost never failing, with those four boosters coming off so neatly at a crucial moment. Talk about effective design. Apparently, there was a time when people could conjure up simplicity and effectiveness at once, on boths sides of the Pacific Ocean. One must concede that those people knew how to think. The Russian guy commanding the ship sounds so calm. He does not seem to loose his composure at all, and cleary knows how to handle the situation. True, he underwent a lot of training, but then again, how many people in a hundred thousand would be able to make it through it? Not me, for sure. Kudos.
NASA PAO talks way too much during all launches, and at the moment of liftoff they try to say something profound or dramatic, as if every launch was Apollo 11. SpaceX used to be really good about not over-talking, but lately they've been taking cues from the NASA PAO.
@Barma Lei - Yes, wrong choice of word on my side. It is considered "space accident" as it was caused by wrong design, but it wasn't technically during a mission.
Как мне нравится смотреть на то как ракета идёт вверх а потом начинает делятся первая вторая и третья часть которая уже и пристыковывается к космической станции. Молодцы русские американцы Ну и итальянцы. Очень люблю смотреть все что касается космоса. Очень уважаю русские Космические корабли. Так держать
Thanks goodness this RUSSIAN COSMONAUTS ARE still Living. GOD BLESS RUSSIANS COSMONAUTS AND ASTRONAUTS 🇷🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇸 REST IN SPACE ALL THE FALLEN COSMONAUTS AND ASTRONAUTS
Amazing - maybe not an example of enabling the launch escape system, that was still an engineering success - I read those ballistic re-entries can go up to 9G. A Testament to the engineers who designed it for it to return safely Might be a little late but glad both returned safe and sound!
*Soyuz MS-10 onboard camera view* th-cam.com/video/h1bCikeXFcA/w-d-xo.html
Launch of Soyuz MS-10 th-cam.com/video/CnQlj73NIm4/w-d-xo.html
International Space Station th-cam.com/play/PLpGTA7wMEDFjV3rHufRlA_0vdSQFL9a40.html
Roscosmos th-cam.com/play/PLpGTA7wMEDFj6UChGp8ODnk9uh18e3Z5X.html
SciNews Why did the animation keep going? With narrator still going?
@@marvinmartinsYT NASA used an old animation to illustrate the launch events.
Girl in background: failure failure.
Girl narrating: everything is fine.
Yeah, she meant everything is fine for the crew considering the booster engine failure. It could've been much worse.
Hahahha
@@dash1dash2 i think she's just following the script
MasterMAT it’s Russia, there’re good at that stuff 🇷🇺
I'll bet she freakin listens next time!
The crew survived , period.
One of the safest rockets in Space history.
Love the Soyuz.
It became a safe ship after they lost an entire crew. Soyuz used went up with three cosmonauts that weren't able to wear their pressure suits he has a spacecraft was too small. There was a fire in a valve in equalisation valve and their blood boil before they got too the chutes opening.in the course of the redesigned they removed one seat in the capsule thus making it safe.
@@JohnRodriguesPhotographer He is talking about the rocket, you are making false statemens about the capsule. Soyuz-MS has 3 seats en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_MS You are thinking of a different capsule Soyuz 7K-OKS en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_11
Ariane has a better track record!
No matter your views on Russia, you have to admire how after the shuttles were retired, the Russians knew they could end every Western country’s human space flight program if they kept Soyuz to themselves. But they didn’t and chose to share Soyuz, which is impressive considering how absurdly ridiculous the idea of Russian cosmonauts and western astronauts flying together was just a few decades ago.
@@sportsfails4998 Of course they're charging the US $75 million a seat. I'd probably share a ride with my rival too for that price.
Congratulations on the first manned rocket flight direct to Kazakhstan!
It wasn't the first one.
At least one other rocket (Soyuz T-10-1) decided it would be nice staying in Kazakhstan.
400 kilometers in a few minutes. How do you like that, Elon Musk?
@@TNTHammer ayyy
It was not a direct flight Soyuz triggered self destruct and the faring pulled them away just as it blew up. In the event the rocket blows up the crew need to make an emergency landing and their backups must prepare for immediate launch. This is the second time Soyuz had a launch abort the first time Vladimir Titov and Gennadi Strekalov lifted off in Soyuz 7K and the rocket blew up on the same pad that Soyuz MS 10 just launched from. Titov pulled the abort handle and as designed the escape tower fired and they landed 30 miles away in Drezkadan.
Pretty certain they didn't see 18Gs as that would likely be deadly. Reports are saying somewhere between 7 and 10 Gs. Published data for the ballistic reentry says it would be somewhere above 8Gs.
Moscow, we have a problemski
:D
😂
Underrated comment haha!
Moscow we’re fucksky!
LOLLLLLL
I love how the animation of the flight does not reflect at all what is actually happening.
Even the telemetry is canned :(
Yeah seriously... really would like to see the abort and landing at the backup site
It's sad that they don't have cameras like SpaceX and others do
With everything going on, they probably didn't have time to shut off the animation.
@@Sammy197 I don't think the guy that operates the animation does anything else. The narrator just didn't pay attention when it happened.
One of the few times a failure was a great success. To have this catastrophic failure and not have loss of crew is absolutely outstanding and is a testament to the Russian's steadfast commitment their tried and true launch system.
why is every comment except mine deleted? is anybody else seeing this?
@@popwarner8029 uh a few things.
1: How does that relate to any of the comments being deleted?
2: HOW DUMB ARE YOU? How is a SPACE PLANE that has a REALLY SMALL hybrid rocket motor NOT reaching space (unless you live in the US) mean spaceflight is impossible?!? Do you even know what a rocket is or is the entirety of your space knowledge Branson's plane? Because what rockets do is instead of using wings they use these things called rocket engines that use a mix of liquid oxygen and a liquid fuel (hydrogen, methane, RP1, etc.) which using newtons 3rd law can propel themselves on the ground, 52 miles up, and in a vacuum. And yes, newtons 3rd law still works in a vacuum. Before you say it doesn't, look at the dozens of videos of people who light a solid rocket motor in a vacuum chamber and then it moves. Not as much as in air but that's because it wasn't designed to be fired in a vacuum. That's why their are sea-level engines and vacuum engines, for efficiency!
@@BPS298 Good Answer Mr Peanut. Ignore the idiots, they stew in a pot of misinformation while the rest of us get excited about new space missions. Did you see Starship stacking? My word that is going to be epic.
in 1983 one exploded but the crew still escaped
Yeah that's what i'm seeing the headline is here. Seems the forces involved there must be a tiny margin for error and it's remarkable when a mission goes 100%. We're trying to go into frickin space for cryin out loud. I'm surprised these things don't blow up every other time. Expensive as hell tho. These missions maybe will make space travel in the future closer to routine.
Nobody:
Spacex: launches astronauts
TH-cam: lets recommend failure of russian rocket
The flight was a succeess actually.
@@wildfox1562 ????
@@wildfox1562 In what world?
Lol true
Why'd you format this as a meme? It's not even close to funny
As much as this sucks for the mission, it’s still a major success in my book. Everyone returned safely and everything performed roughly as it should, given the contingency. The rules of aviation/space travel are written in blood and we’ve learned many tragic lessons throughout the decades. It’s good to see that all of that sacrifice is starting to pay off for the next generation of astronauts/cosmonauts/etc.
Astronaut Nick Hague speaking about the Soyuz MS-10 launch
th-cam.com/video/op7FHmEypxE/w-d-xo.html
It's very rare to see Soyuz fail.
Glad cosmonauts are safe.
Soyuz didn't fail, it done it's job as designed, saved crew from rocket fail.
Yup! Happy End.
There was also one astronaut on the flight
It sure as hell fixed a bad situation. Glad everyone's okay. Russians make a badass rocket.
"Very rare"
Just thought I’d mention that Alexei Ovchinin’s first words after emerging from the Soyuz capsule after this failure were as he turned to Nick Hague “Well, that was a short trip”.
Rockets fail, they by their nature are dangerous machines, nice to see the Russians built a great back up escape feature, and it work to thank God, two brave men returned to earth safely
Thank to god? No, thank to the engineers who designed that
Soyuz has the best service record, no one has ever built a manned spacecraft that so good stats.
Exactly, thanks God.
Thanks Igor.
@@SparrowNoblePoland Rocket's by their design are highly volatile machines, Soyuz is no different than the Saturn V, or the rockets that put the US space shuttle into orbit, anything can go wrong, it just take on oh-shit by a technician and it turns into a giant fire works display.
Good to hear the escape system worked and the crew are OK.
They didn't use the escape tower, they got to second stage ignition and then aborted to a descent
They didn't use the escape system. They had already jettisoned the escape tower.
The tower is just *one component* of the emergency escape system. The system continues to function all the way to orbit, using different sets of engines on the fairing and the ship itself.
You literally can watch as they jettison the escape tower. They did not use this to abort.
You are correct, the tower was jettisoned and was not involved in this abort scenario.
But the tower is not the emergency escape system. it is only one set of the emergency escape system engines which are used for abort in the earliest stages of the flight and on the ground. There are also engines on the ship and on the fairing. Depending on the phase of flight, emergency escape system operates by different means. But it continues to function all the way to the orbit.
So sorry to hear about the failure, but glad the systems in place worked as designed. The Soyuz has a very awesome track record, glad to see the safety mechanisms worked as designed!
Komarov ... :(
Fastest way to kazakhstan I guess
yowww i haven't seen your post in a while
Borat would love that, remember how long it took to cross America?
Lol.. Yes..
I live in Kazakhstan
Most expensive way for sure.
I have to take my hat off to Russian engineering! Two men are alive today because of it 🇺🇸 🇷🇺
I think there's more than 2 people alive today
@@headphone_ lol wdym?
and 1000,000 dead from there shit cars lol
Funny, we have never seen those two men again.
@@robert7622 *their
They beat Spacex on earth to earth passenger flights.
How many people did SpaceX transport into space so far? Oh, right, ZERO ...
Hence why they beat them... You must be fun at parties.
Michael Riediger I don’t think you understand....
Michael Riediger
Did you read the comment first?
Soyuz has been operating for over 20+ years......Falcon 9 barely ten and they land the entire first stage.......2019....Falcon 9 has crew dragon. Two separate rockets on complete separate timelines. You can’t compare.
Russia : "Failure of the booster. Emergency separation"
NASA : "Everything is going well. Soyuz is on its way to space"
Well... Journalists reading their scripts.
hehehe true
Marcolepsie yeeee yeeeeshhh 😯
Would that be classified as fake news on the NASA side. Lol
The Video Graphics show the flight as normal and the NASA lady is reading the script provided.
If ISRO help soyuz then it can better performs because ISRO is 100% master in rocket tech.
The only people that do not make mistakes are the people that do not do things.
It’s unfortunate the rocket launch did not go well but great job on the launch recovery system.
It is the first failed launch that I’ve seen where the people we’re alive afterwards.
Greg Walker imagine now that the escape system was designed 40 years ago and never used mid air.
Neoptolemus
nothing about Rockets are particularly safe.
I would have no problem trusting a System designed 40 years ago that just shows that it was designed well.
if you’ve ever flown in airplane you trusting system designed at least 40 years ago with the exceptions of engines commercial airliners have changed very little.
Where can we see them alive?
Google.
Duhya google what? I said that I’ve seen I grew up during the Space shuttle and those did not go well when they failed
To the brave crew of Soyuz MS-10 and to their support team, well done! You recognized a problem and brought your crew back alive. Thank you.
Glad they are safe.
The NASA lady doing the audio was reading from her script without paying any attention to what the Russian lady was reporting real time. Once again, JSC at their finest...
I'm sure there are strict PR rules that constrain the "NASA lady". If anything appears to go wrong, predetermined rules come into effect. Some "suits" decide what the public gets to hear.
"One minute fifteen seconds. Velocity 2900 feet per second, altitude 9 nautical miles, downrange distance 7 nautical miles..." -- PAO @ STS-51-L two seconds after the orbiter exploded. These people don't get the same data feed we do, they can only talk about what they actually have in front of them. And they try hard not to be distracted.
@@DevSolar how many G's would 2 guys experience when strapped to a heavy lift rocket - 60 seconds into escape of Earths atmosphere.......?
@Bob Loblaw, Roadside Lawyer She said the escape tower *jettisoned* - a normal part of the launch sequence.
@@k311ydcart3r You don't know what you're talking about. This is the fundamental difference between NASA and Soviet/Russian programs. NASA always has provided a live launch feed and a live feed of air-to-ground radio. The Soviets and Russians do not. Every time there's a launch or a spacewalk or a major ISS activity, NASA TV will show it live. NASA makes it a point to always be open with their activities to gain the support of Congress and the American public.
The Russian translator is screaming failure failure failure! Meanwhile, the American narrator is saying the mission is proceeding as planned.
About 800 starts, 2 failures, a Russian official said.
When your GF is alone at home
*And she lives in Kazakhstan*
*Underrated*
le Hoarderz Al-Shekelsteins 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
What a fantastic channel! Scientific news straight to the point, no ads nor annoying people talking too much, and going straight from the sources! Keep up the great work!
Fake space flight but glad everyone is safe!
@@tommyhughes5571 "fake space flight"? What's that supposed to mean?
Amazing. As citizens from the US and citizens from Russia, we may have disagreements along the lines of our respected Federal governments. However, we cannot deny that we share a history of innovation and creativity when it comes to science and engineering. Cheers!
Sad for the launch failure, glad for the safety of cosmonauts. At least we know the escape system works well
Nobody can escape he that comes from god but go ahead and mourn the failure of men's hands
So, is it true that they accidentely put Vodka in the fuel tank?
I dontknow amen, very good engineering, nice
Congrats Russia and the thousands of Engineers and Technicians involved over the years. Another crew safely returned to Earth by the ever reliable Soyuz.
Where can we see them returned to earth and stepping out of the capsule?
Was the Russian girl saying booster failure as the NASA girl was saying every things normal?
The Russian girl were translating the conversation of Russian MCC team. The NASA girl were reading the prepared text. Moreover, the animation of rocket flight was also prepared and lost any touch with reality since 3:53-3:55 (the moment of emergency separation).
Time delay..
That moment at 3:53 I thought, "that doesn't look good...at all...and don't tell me that is what it looks like when the escape tower is jettisoned."
It makes sense since its pretty normal in NASA to have failures during space flights :D it is just a joke. I respect all people in NASA.
@@hhale The escape tower was indeed jettisoned. What saved the crew was the second launch abort system which was built into the protective shell.
So, can we conclude that the animation that is supposed to be based on real telemetry from the rocket, is in fact not based on real telemetry? Since the animation shows speed and altitude and plot-curves all normal?
Yup, it's fake news.
That was just comical...
Well, this is awkward..
It would be fine if the animation was pretenders, but the flight telemetry data was accurate. But if telemetry is just nominal, then that’s really weird.
It shows what is supposed to go for viewers to see something since they dont have cameras on it like spacex. Thats why the animation didnt have the error bec it was made ahead of time
I almost can’t finish watching this if I don’t know the crew is actually safe in the first place. Deep respect to all astronauts and scientists.
One of the most reliable pieces of equipment in the world but even the most reliable fails now and again.
Steven Wrigley the safety measures for emergency incidents is great, this proves it, they did good
@Boarlaw Attorneys At Law that’s made up lol
@@adamkerman475 Ikr lol
Good job on the escape system, thank god!
Except the LES was apparently not used on this occasion.
This is a common misconception. The spire on the top of the rocket is the solid fuel engines for the flight abort system, and they are jettisoned relatively early in the flight (here it happened before the malfunction became apparent.) But the flight abort system is a much more comprehensive thing than just this engine unit -- it monitors the flight and uses different sets of hardware on the payload fairing and on the ship itself to save the crew in the event of booster malfunction throughout the flight.
They escaped doom, thank god....better?
I thank good engineering. God is unreliable.
Thank the engineers!
WAUW I thought that when something would go wrong, the astronauts are dead. Amazing that there even are emergency "back to earth" possibities. And as the men are alrright, they have worked perfect. Amazing as the height and speed were really high already. Amazing outcome. Real great work by the designers and crators of this rocket system. My respect.
I have not seen them returned to earth and stepping out of a capsule. Has anyone?
@@erepsekahs I think it would be not only difficult to accurately judge where the capsule might land, but also dangerous to be in the potential drop zone. Idk if anyone has literally seen a capsule drop in and cosmo/astronauts step out but then again it's not exactly something that happens very often. All that matter really is that it worked and they were safe.
Credit where credits due, well done having a system robust enough to safely land the crew after a launch malfunction.
Booster fail at 2:45 into the flight closely followed by the Soyuz (radio) recovery beacon sending AN in Morse code. Glad the recovery system worked as it should and the crew walked away. Go Soyuz!
What does that Morse code mean?
@@NewWorldLies The Spacecraft is sending this ··-· ·- ·· ·-·· ··- ·-· ·
It means 'Failure'
or this
···---···
(SOS)
ooh i thought it was a glitch
I didn't hear anything
@@sahilkate1061 Suggest you watch this again. Although I'm a licensed radio amateur, I'm pretty poor at reading Morse but it leapt out at me. VERY strong Morse.
I'm happy they're okay! Im just a regular person in awe of their efforts, and grateful for this channel. I wish I could get those guys a sammich and coffee, that's a rough work day. Wish I had that kind of composure, too.
Ebonics on the sandwich
@@toddvolpe6396
They don't speak Swahili in Russia.
These guys are basically test pilots. They loved every minute and likely hated it was over so fast.
@@Alisa_25_16 So, how were they walking, and talking shortly after? I'd call alive ok enough, but I hope they're healthy, too.
Do you believe that we'd have thought you were special if you hadn't said otherwise? ;-D
Test pilots who scream when they are in danger wash out early.
The calmness of the crew is outstanding.
They just wanted to go to Kazachstan
Who needs Musk's BFR's city to city tranport when you have soyuz doing that already? ^^
Is KazaCHstan part of Switzerland?
The correct intl. spelling is Kazakhstan, however, linguistically that's not matching the language. It should be Qazaqstan, according to national spelling Қазақстан, not Казахстан.
+ ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Hi ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) They STARTED from Kazakhstan, as Baikonour IS IN KAZAKHSTAN (I have been there 3 years ago).
Kazakhstan was part of the former USSR (or Soviet Union or whatever you call it). It is the only Russian base outside of Russia. They invested so much in it, they were not going to build another launch-base on Russian ground.
Hello
It's kind of funny to see people bashing the Soyuz. Who designed their system so people can be safely recovered, versus who designed their system so people die (and have died)? This is actually very impressive.
@Truth Filter For TH-cam And you know this how?
People have died on Soyuz, but, like us, they fixed the problem and went back up.
@@howardsmith9342 People may have died in Soyuz spacecraft but no one has died during launch. Soyuz has always had an emergency escape system, in fact it has more than one. The Space Shuttle did not so, no, the Americans did not fix the problem - identified after Challenger explosion - and lost another crew on Columbia (for admittedly different reasons). If I were going into space right now the only rocket I would want under me is Soyuz.
@@thethirdman225 You are correct in that nobody has died during liftoff. In fact, the effectiveness of that escape system was proven recently. But people have died during reentry, and that is just as important as launch. Soyuz has been in service for a long time, and has proved itself.
@@howardsmith9342 It will only really be replaced once SpaceX and Orion get man rated. Let's just hope they stay away from solid fuel boosters though.
Shows that emergency procedures and equipment can safely return crew to earth in the event of an aborted launch. Roscosmos cosmonaut Alexey Ovchinin and NASA astronaut Nick Hague have landed safely.
Soyuz MS-10 crew safe after booster failure th-cam.com/video/5PIUBk8kRCI/w-d-xo.html
0:01 they smacking his butt lmao
But why tho 😂😂 I this like a tradition?
@@joaopedrodebarrosdaeira5466 I am asuming yea
@@joaopedrodebarrosdaeira5466 they're making sure their asses can take the g-forces
Just tenderising their buttocks for the long journey ahead
Russian tradition
I am glad that cosmonaut Alexey Ovchinin and astronaut Nick Hague are safe!
Space flights are always a risky business! Soyuz is a robust companion and this time everything went well!
Everyone is talking about spacex ship docking with iss nowadays... But Ussr did it decades ago... Its stunning
O was getting worried for a second, that we lost some of our best.
I am really glad everybody is safe!
Oh my! I started sweating cold when I read the title. Glad they are ok!
Crew safe👏👏👏
they're like: Booster failed
commentary: WOW! THEY GOIN REALLY FAST LOL!
For people saying BS about Soyuz, it's still holds record for safe crew flights. Boosters have probability of failure by 40% besides crew os safe, so all wasn't a failure unlike challenger. Besides you can do little with peanut size budget this rocket has already surpassed engine meeting challenges than NASA's massive budget.
Soyuz MS-10 abort explained th-cam.com/video/BCJe694E1zA/w-d-xo.html
The USA and NASA is garbage, right comrade?
The USSR/Russia has had its share of emergencies, too. Look up the Soyuz 18a/Soyuz 18-1 incident in 1975. Makarov and Lazarev had a very harrowing escape, and Lazarev suffered serious internal injuries that prevented him from flying again (and may have also shortened his life). Also look at the high-G reentry where the Soyuz failed to cleanly separate from the Service Module/PAO, the first of which happened to Soyuz 5 and later both Soyuz TMA-10 and TMA-11. Let's not forget Soyuz 1 and Soyuz 10, either. Space flight is highly unforgiving of the slightest error, no matter what nation is launching.
If something fails
Pple r desperately watching it and commenting negatively
Love mother russia from india
Shut up you wanker
This is amazing! The fact that the escape tower was already jettisoned. There was an extra backup emergency system in place to create a ballistics trajectory for the crew's capsule to safely return. Both of the Astronauts/Comosnauts survived and unscathed. It's one of the safest and best rockets ever built. 😁🚀
Even with the failure, the crew still landed safely back to earth. It shows how fantastic they build the beast.
After the accident, the crew behaves calmly and continues to work as if the rocket is flying normally. This is the confirmation that the preparation is going well ..
When you’re still learning to play KSP trying to reach a complete orbit
Very glad all systems for escape worked. This is still a job well done in My eyes , it's very rare for this to happen these days.
We witnessed a miracle today. Congratulations on a flawless recovery operation. Bummer about losing the mission and the down time for the investigation(s).
Failure can happen at any time. The best part is the support infrastructure of recovery and safety. The more the optional choice of recovery the better.
Holy shit balls glad they survived. Any person deserving of being sent to space is priceless to humanity. Glad we still have these two souls
So, do we get a discount on the next launch??
Bugdriver I thought orbit was guaranteed in 30 min or it's free!
DA!! ABSOLUTELY!!! Increase Sanctions! PAZALSTA! YOU keep the change of unsold Russian product! DA? OK with you? :-)
NYET, NYET!... *NYET!!!* Contract states "If US try INVADE Russia, Bear shall have UN approval for Russia providing *free service of blowing ENTIRE US into orbit in 30 minutes!"* THAT is why Trump always insist that US enter BAD Deals, for you guys cannot read small writing on Contracts!
@@mikhailalexandrovichrimsky5501 we didn't ask for a Russian troll but ok...
They'll get free accomodation, food vouchers and discount on their next flight. Thank you for flying Soyuz
It was great luck that the russian engineers decided to put a second launch escape system on the capsule. The failure occured, right after the first launch escape system had been jettisoned
Russia Makes very good Engines. Even during a Malfunction the Crew came home safe. Amazing Job to the Russian Engineers.
@Boarlaw Attorneys At Law all of Russias launchers are old the soyuz is based on a early cold war ICBM
Thank God the Crew is Safe.
That's resilient design. They survived! Thank's for the video.
Ovchinin opened the door for Skvortsov, Morgan and Parmitano just minutes ago in the ISS, In the Soyuz MS-13 !!
Astronauts are so brave people !!
Но как спокойно реагирует Овчинин. Вот уж воистину, стальные ... у человека.
Ты летишь на границе космоса. 75 км над землёй. Под тобой десятки тонн считай взрывчатки. И машина, которая втащила тебя туда, мягко говоря, сломалась. Причем это "сломалась" может означать что угодно, от просто выключился двигатель, до разбора всего вокруг на атомы.
А в эфир никакого "Ох @#&, ах :%* пи пи пи". "Авария носителя, да?"
Понимаю, что их готовят к такому, но ведь это не тренажер. Тут ставки совсем другие.
В общем, парни, снимаю шляпу!
Я тоже об этом же подумала. Герои!!!
Agree
Одень шляпу.Космонавтов для такого тренируют.
Да, я согласен с вами.
I can't transmit the degree of my respect in english but the main idea: that guys are heroes with steel balls. They did' t demonstrate any emotions in very frightening situation when every next second may be the last one because the missle can demolish space aroun it to atoms. But we can't hear something like "WTF....". Nothing else than very calm messages.
As an American NASA and SpaceX fanboy, I do love the Soyuz rocket
Hashtag metoo within the first 20 seconds of the video. I'm glad these two made it out alive, it's easy to see why they consider rockets safer than the old space shuttle when it comes down to emergency landing. Could you imagine being Nick Hague on your first trip to space and then this happens... I think I would retire after that launch.
You've got The Wrong Stuff ;oD
Dad used to say if you land with the same number of astronauts as you stated with you did ok.
Booster failure. Crew landed in Kazakhstan.
See 4 minutes
Apparently at an altitude of 45 kilometers... Emergency descent successful... Landed east of the Kazakh town of Dzhezkazgan... crew fine!
The crew is not hurt
While at it, they could unintentionally have broken the Guinness record for fastest intercity travel.
Every now and then I return to this video to remind myself that failure is in fact an option. The calmness, the deliberate actions of the crew and ground control staff, the orderly communication, it all points toward people who were prepared, people who unlike the NASA announcer weren't just going through the moves by rote. This mission was a success, A success made possible by preparedness and professionalism.
In Vegas, in business, in spaceflight... If you don't understand how to fail as safely as possible you are in the wrong game.
Indeed
Failure is a better success than Success
Failure shows a way to learn
Man's survive, that's impotant than crashed rocket!
That stupid feeling, when you open a video called launch failure, and still hope it will be a success.
🙌🏾😌😌🤦🏾♀️
It would have to be nerve wrecking as hell to pilot one of those things into perfect rendezvous with the station. Hats off to the brave men and women who do it and love it.
Where can i see the full stream without that lady's narration? I wanna hear the technical communication better.
Отработали аварийную посадку, будто каждый день так летают. Браво, стоя. У наших космонавтов стальные яйца
dangerous every time. glad the crew made it back safe.
Why they get the knee to the butt on the way up the stairs? Is that some sort of tradition?
Lots of weird traditions and superstitions, peeing on the bus tire on the way to the launch pad etc... Everything that was done when Gagarin flew is done every time.
lol, that made me laugh loud!
Was probably how they "motivated" Yuri to get on that thing (I wouldn't blame him for being a bit hesitant to get on something that has zero track record and incredibly lethal consequences for failure). Now it's TRADITION!
Hmm they might need to do a risk assessment before they injure a Cosmonaut right before a launch and have to abort. That would waste the millions of dollars and all the countless hours spent on training and preparation.
No, Michael Dust, it's not "gayness".
It isn't any more than a football coach slapping his players' butts.
0:06 *casually kicks butt*
Wtf🤣🤣🤣
I think it’s a tradition lol
@@hwinangkoso o thx
No its 0:08.
Haha yeah tradition or good luck 🤔
Scary. Glad they are well and safe.
Thank God everyone is kay. Hope they get another chance to go to ISS.
What about PTSD...!?
Given the current much less than friendly actions of USA+Israel+British governments, we can't exclude the chance they would share your optimism about crew surviving that...
Vamsi Krishna Possibly applicable to rocket engineers on the ground in this case.
Although Soyuz will now be taken offline for any human launches, maybe for a few months at least?
Can we leave nonexisting „deities“ out of the equation?
Amazing. While the English-speaking Russian commentator is clearly describing a genuine flight emergency, the NASA commentator keeps calling out pre-scripted ascent updates. Then FINALLY at 8:12 -- after a protracted silence -- the NASA commentator chimes in with a walk-in-the-park no-big-deal reaction about an 'issue' with the booster. There is no reason to expect an overreaction -- but at least ditch the auto-pilot mode and narrate in a way that resembles a noticeable measure of concern.
They are obviously not hearing each other, and are possibly even on different continents.
The NASA announcer simply commented on what was already shown on the screen -- the info-graphics prepared in advance, that was showing what was *supposed* to happen in a nominal launch.
The Russian announcer was translating the communications between the ship and the ground in real time.
European Space Agency also uses pre-prepared graphics. When the telemetry was lost in on of the flights earlier this year, they kept showing the altitude and velocity that were *supposed* to occur at a particular time, without knowing what was really happening.
My complaint is mostly about your point -- about listening to a script-reader with no sense of what is happening in real time. If *we* could hear the Russians -- why was the NASA narrator entirely unaware? The technical reason is obvious -- she was not hooked in. Why this happens makes no sense at all. Why have a narrator who is the last person on Earth to notice what is happening?
I agree that it was underwhelming and one could expect NASA to be able to do better. But apparently they can't. It seems like a simple thing to do, but in reality it is probably not so simple.
Here we have a lady with a nice voice, probably sitting in a sound-booth somewhere in Houston, reading a simple, clear, vetted in advance script. To do better, one would need to find somebody actually quite knowledgeable about the launch process and the vehicle, who has time to do the commentary besides fulfilling whatever their main duty is, plus having the ability to do that in an engaging impromptu manner, plus (a huge hassle in practice!) having the OK from a bunch of managers who oversee these kinds of things.
Look at the interviews Elon Musk gives. The guy is brilliant and really knows his stuff, but he is often painful to listen to, just because he does not have a talent for public speaking. SpaceX engineers chosen to do a running commentary for their launch webcasts are usually much better, but even they regularly say things that make no sense at all, just because it is really hard to do a coherent real time commentary.
All true. Thanks for letting me vent.
This is not a failure..
A failure is when space shuttle explode and kill all the crew..
This is a perfect example for a good contingency program!
to be fair the space shuttle was reusable and this was a new rocket
@@kermitfrog3789 Doesn't matter, the frame of the shuttle never failed without a reason. The SRBs and the fact that NASA didn't really care about safety where dangerous.
If I had the choice, I’ll take the animated launch thanks 👍🏼
Glad they were ok though..
Soyuz MS-10 onboard camera view th-cam.com/video/h1bCikeXFcA/w-d-xo.html
Astronaut Nick Hague speaking about the Soyuz MS-10 launch
th-cam.com/video/op7FHmEypxE/w-d-xo.html
Basically the same rocket over some sixty years, and it almost never failing, with those four boosters coming off so neatly at a crucial moment. Talk about effective design. Apparently, there was a time when people could conjure up simplicity and effectiveness at once, on boths sides of the Pacific Ocean. One must concede that those people knew how to think. The Russian guy commanding the ship sounds so calm. He does not seem to loose his composure at all, and cleary knows how to handle the situation. True, he underwent a lot of training, but then again, how many people in a hundred thousand would be able to make it through it? Not me, for sure. Kudos.
It is not really the same rocket as it was sixty years ago tho, cuz Soyuz was modified many times since 70's.
need to put a narrator in there that has *some* semblance of rocket launch knowledge, or just find someone that can listen to the launch controller.
NASA PAO talks way too much during all launches, and at the moment of liftoff they try to say something profound or dramatic, as if every launch was Apollo 11. SpaceX used to be really good about not over-talking, but lately they've been taking cues from the NASA PAO.
at least the astronauts survived
Dimitri, why does the vodka taste like liquid oxegyn?
lol dark humour.
Unfortunately that actually happened to an Apollo mission. Capsule filled with pure oxygen, fire, everybody roasted.
Pomo Dorino
It was NOT mission
It was routine training
@Barma Lei - Yes, wrong choice of word on my side.
It is considered "space accident" as it was caused by wrong design, but it wasn't technically during a mission.
I would say liquid nitrogen. Liquid oxygen is blue and wouldn't pass as good vodka.
@@pomodorino1766 I was going more for one of the engineers filling the fuel tank with vodka instead
Как мне нравится смотреть на то как ракета идёт вверх а потом начинает делятся первая вторая и третья часть которая уже и пристыковывается к космической станции. Молодцы русские американцы Ну и итальянцы. Очень люблю смотреть все что касается космоса. Очень уважаю русские Космические корабли. Так держать
Best thing crew is saved. Failure means more concentrations.
Wow, amazing achievement! Has anyone ever survived a launched booster failure before?
Thanks goodness this RUSSIAN COSMONAUTS ARE still Living. GOD BLESS RUSSIANS COSMONAUTS AND ASTRONAUTS
🇷🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇸
REST IN SPACE ALL THE FALLEN COSMONAUTS AND ASTRONAUTS
This was the testing of a surface to surface rocket with a human payload. When ready it will carry passengers from Moscow to Vladivostok.
If you looked at the engine plumes you can see a series of backfires or pulses during liftoff just before stage separation
The commentator in front : *expectation*
The commentator in the background : *reality*
Amazing - maybe not an example of enabling the launch escape system, that was still an engineering success - I read those ballistic re-entries can go up to 9G. A Testament to the engineers who designed it for it to return safely
Might be a little late but glad both returned safe and sound!
Soyuz never fails even it fails it dosent fail*
A failure is a failure. Nothing in between. When something goes boom it is boom. Buy US quality parts next time.
@@qqube4762 ha ha ha ha ha ha
Soyuz.. security guarantee on flights.
I can't imagine the same happy outcome of them being fine with another spacecraft.
I would prefer Soyuz than airplane in crash situations.
It wasn't exactly a crash, more like an airplane diverting to a nearby airport due to an emergency.
@@listerdave1240 The probable reason named that boosters jettisoned and hit central body. Exact reason will be known weeks later.
@@dirtrusty7228 You can prefer to be first astronaut on Dragon 2. Zero flights, zero crashes.
Talk about some VERY LUCKY Astro/Cosmonauts.
I think that ass slap was bad luck.