Oui, absolument. La difficulté est de ne pas faire le trille main gauche de manière mesurée, mais totalement indépendante de la main droite. Ah quels merveilleux trilles main gauche dans l'impromptu en sol bémol majeur de Schubert...
Just love coming back and back to this rendition. Thanks so much, made my day. Can anyone help me with the complicated stretch from 2:02 to 2:12 - is there a name for this kind of music phrasing?
If one plays the cadenza on the piano, one should exploit the possibilities of the piano and voice more carefully. Bach write so many lines into the bass and the inner voices that this papers over. Listen to Cortot or Furtwangler to understand what I mean.
This doesn't sound good. Like don't get me wrong, the guy has talent, but this piece doesn't sound like it was written to be played on a piano. It sounds so HEAVY, and this sounds like it was meant to sound light and springy. The player sounds like he is struggling to keep the sound _piano_. The piano sound is heavy. It messes with the piece and gives it a dynamic it wasn't meant to have. This was meant for harpsichord.
![ลองสุ่มไอโฟน 990 โกงมั้ย? [ โกงมั้ยครับ ep.101 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bfsWe0j492k/mqdefault.jpg)
This’s definitely one of my favorite Bach’s masterpieces
I've heard the harpsichord solo a million times, this is really good
The most complete solo version on youtube, respect ！
@Bach Wagner Really boomer ? I'm talking about home made cover version not glenn gould or karl richter..
Impresionante. Good work
Beautiful 👑❤️
amazing playing!!
well done, hats off :)
Bravissimo! Outstanding!
Impresionante, bravo!!!
WOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
Fantastic!
@jormundgard What a beautiful piece of music anyway, thanks !
Oui, absolument. La difficulté est de ne pas faire le trille main gauche de manière mesurée, mais totalement indépendante de la main droite. Ah quels merveilleux trilles main gauche dans l'impromptu en sol bémol majeur de Schubert...
Tout comme dans le n°2 en la bémol majeur op.142, dans la partie la plus grave du trio... Ah ! Schubert... ❤️
bravo!
BRAVO!
Impresionante!!!!!!
FLASHNAFLASHNA!!!
2:56
Super!!
Just love coming back and back to this rendition. Thanks so much, made my day.
Can anyone help me with the complicated stretch from 2:02 to 2:12 - is there a name for this kind of music phrasing?
@sned10000
"Quelles dispositions il s'agit" je ne comprends pas
On peut avoir la partition ici:
imslp.info/files/imglnks/usimg/e/ed/IMSLP02043-BWV1050.pdf
👍👍👍👍❤️
how can you do this?
If one plays the cadenza on the piano, one should exploit the possibilities of the piano and voice more carefully. Bach write so many lines into the bass and the inner voices that this papers over. Listen to Cortot or Furtwangler to understand what I mean.
It sounds good, but loses the crisp sound though. This is a great performance nonetheless
This sounds pretty crisp to me. Do you mean because it isn't played on Cembalo?
Bach should have written more like that.
C'est dommage que les percussions latines ne soient pas plus fortes.
sheet music anyone???
imslp
Sounds totally weird on the piano, when compared to a harpsichord.
7 dislikes?
Zeig Dich , Du !
Weitere Videos ansehen!
English ?
wonderful and very virtuoso. Karl Richter would have applauded you with standing ovations. (th-cam.com/video/MhMdAdRtT8s/w-d-xo.html)
This doesn't sound good. Like don't get me wrong, the guy has talent, but this piece doesn't sound like it was written to be played on a piano. It sounds so HEAVY, and this sounds like it was meant to sound light and springy. The player sounds like he is struggling to keep the sound _piano_. The piano sound is heavy. It messes with the piece and gives it a dynamic it wasn't meant to have. This was meant for harpsichord.
Don’t like how the piano sounds
more what i was looking for. u missing notes and not honoring the tempo changes, and rushing it