I'm still heartbroken because of the loss of life. I was at work in Seffner,FL. I shut my computer down,and the people in my office asked...what are doing? I told them I was going home to be with my family. They didn't realize that this was an act of war. 😢💔🙏
News anchor was wrong to suggest navigation was a possibility after the second plane. No doubt it was terrorism, no accident. You could see the way it came in it was driven with malice at top speed.
@@Oh-Ben No there were other reporters that day who instantly knew it was an intentional act. The dope even said, "possibly the fuselage stayed in those upper floors." He's not that sharp.
There was originally a possibility - a very remote possibility, but still - that the first plane had suffered a catastrophic loss of cabin pressure that had rendered the pilots unconscious and left it careening uncontrolled around the airspace until it crashed; an unfortunate example of such a crash was Helios Flight 522. A lot of reporters _and laymen_ however seem to think that Air Traffic Control somehow physically controls aircraft in some way. They don't seem to understand that ATC merely orders pilots where and in which direction to fly, and no airline transport pilot would ever in a billion years accept an order that took them that close to a tall building they could clearly see.
@@Oh-Ben Terrorism was well established even in 2001. The towers were attacked 8 years prior. Now you have 2 planes committing suicide within 18 minutes of each other. The second plane ruled out any possibility it was anything else. No accident happens twice within such a short time. He is either in denial or lacked the courage to be honest with his viewers. Poor.
In retrospect, I commend CNN for how they broke into a commercial to put this out. (This is what I had on when the story broke, though I was in another room listening to it). I've looked at a lot of the others. Some of them were hesitant, it now seems. NBC and "The Today Show" was downright peculiar, concluding an interview, mentioning the World Trade Center, but not what happened, like a teaser for the next segment, and then going to commercials before coming back.
That Today show clip with Matt throwing to a commercial break was down to the fact they didn't have the live camera showing the burning North Tower ready for him to show on air, and so decided to throw to a commercial, as no one knew if this was a terror attack when the first building was hit. No conspiracy, just rational logic.
At the time, there was no indication that it was definitely terrorism. 20 minutes later, it was clearly intentional. The initial reports did not indicate terorism because it wasn’t clear that is what it was.
@@nateboy1489Some people thought when the second plane hit it was footage of the first plane- until the horrified commentators said it was live and all hell was breaking loose.
CNN was a little overly cautious in their reporting compared to other stations. ABC and Fox were much quicker to draw their own (correct) conclusions when Flight 175 hit the 2nd tower.
A lot of people weren't paying close attention at this point. I think the second plane impacted ~18 minutes later? For the longest time it was just an ongoing fire after a plane crash. No new developments to be staring at the screen for. If you look at news coverage from other channels/sources most of them actually don't notice the second plane; just the explosion.
Those reporters are ignorant. And that wasn't a sonic boom it was probably around 20,000 gallons of kerosene. it's not going faster than the speed of sound.
I remember I was in math class and we all knew 3000 bodies missing didn’t add up to a building collapse . That was second grade , the teacher was laughing at how ridiculous it was .
Why was everyone so clueless when reporting this it was obvious it was done on purpose and it was obvious they were passenger planes propeller planes would never do that much damage.
I saw this footage as it was being broadcast I vividly remember this exact footage (although I was only four years old and didn’t really know what was going on)
They all had the problem of more airtime than verified accurate information to fill it with. This led to a lot of repetition of what little they they thought they knew mixed with speculation about what they didn't.
He was there promoting the No Child Left Behind Act - a program for underprivileged schools. Maybe you just don’t pay attention to what’s going on because they literally all do it. Obama did in 2009, Reagan & Bush visited junior highs, Trump visited a school in 2017 & Biden visited a middle school last year. Not everything is suspicious.
@@ronaldtaylor8901 He was there promoting the No Child Left Behind Act - a program for underprivileged schools. Maybe you just don’t pay attention to what’s going on because they literally all do it. Obama did in 2009, Reagan & Bush visited junior highs, Trump visited a school in 2017 & Biden visited a middle school last year. Not everything is suspicious.
He was there promoting the No Child Left Behind Act - a program for underprivileged schools. Maybe you just don’t pay attention to what’s going on because they literally all do it. Obama did in 2009, Reagan & Bush visited junior highs, Trump visited a school in 2017 & Biden visited a middle school last year. Not everything is suspicious.
No minuto 18:42 o repórter diz que recebeu fotos “INCRÍVEIS ” dos dois aviões de Lower Manhattann, um atingido cada uma das torres com 18 minutos de diferença! Eu sinceramente achei esse comentário extremamente desnecessário, visto a tragédia extrema que já se anunciava naquele momento, apenas com a perda das vidas dos passageiros e tripulantes dos aviões e das pessoas do local aonde os aviões colidiram que morreram na hora do impacto!😮😢. Muito triste 😞 Comentário grotesco!Sinto muito, mas não posso deixar de me expressar…🙏🏻⭐️🕊️🇧🇷
RAPPELEZ VOUS le maire de shansville : "pas de trace d'avion ici" le 1 er journaliste au pentagone bob pugt: " aucun avion ne s'est craché" AUCUNE boite noire au WTC 1 et 2 et tout et tout le reste! C'EST EVIDENT il n'y avait pas plus d'avion de ligne nul part, un point c'est tout, concluez ce que vous voulez, c'est la pensée universelle qui le dit, pas moi, tout les annalyses mènent à cet évidence .
Pour une démolition contrôlée d'un bâtiment il faut : 1 - Destruction à la base . 2 - Que le bâtiment tombe droit . 3 - Des vagues d'explosions . 4 - Que le bâtiment tombe en chute libre . 5 - En petits morceaux pour l'enlèvement . 6 - Pas toucher si possible aux autres bâtis . 7 - Des bruits de détonnations et des éclairs . 8 - Du béton pulvérisé en poussière. 9 - Squibs aux étages inférieurs . 10 - Preuves chimiques dans les poussiéres . 11 - Savoir le momment axact de la chute du bâtiment . 12 - des coupes en biseaux des poutres aciers
The collapses initiated in the areas damaged by the impacts, not at the base. The tops of the towers began tipping in the direction of the greatest exterior damage, for the South Tower it was to the east, the North Tower tipped to its north. The damaged floors in the impact zones were unable to support the movement and began collapsing. The undamaged floors below the impacts were unable to stop the weight coming down upon them and collapsed in turn. In a controlled demolition, the entire structure moves downward due to the removal of support below. That did not happen in either Tower. The lower parts of the building remain in place until they are destroyed by the weight coming down from above. Each of the towers had tens of thousands of employees and workers on a daily basis, there were zero reports by anyone of the type of work required to accomplish a demolition. 23 years after the fact and there is still zero evidence that contradicts the official findings of what and how it happened.
10.00 the woman on the phone, Jeanne Yurman, seems to be the most stupid person: "just around 30 people in the area" What??? - "The north tower is the one with the observation deck: It is!" No it wasnt!
True. Don't care about Trump, don't care about CNN, but you had to be there that day to know how concise and accurate Fox news was that day. The scenes from inside the building, the area where the kill zone was, the horror of it--to this day, I can't find that specific footage and I've realized it's because it was probably too graphic to show anymore.
@@policerthought5649Are US citizens really not gonna vote for trump? After all the transgender thing in schools, a president with dementia, the VP saying he is as mentally capable as ever, illegals living in hotels and veterans on the streets, the VP not even being able to speak without a teleprompter. I mean im not from the US but i thought people voting for Kamala didn’t exist 😂
At video time 07:19, there’s a UFO near the tower, traveling at an angle. What do you think it is? I believe the first helicopters arrived a bit later..
Imagine being so stupid you think Israelis would be behind this, and then dance wide in the open showing everybody they're celebrating what they did. They're so evil and smart they're able to do this and get away with it, but somehow also so stupid they dance in the open and show everybody. In reality they were filming it. Nobody was dancing. You're just a liar. Typical lying scumbag. "They cry out in pain as the strike you" is the perfect quote for what neo nazis do. They do everything they accuse jews of. Pogroms, inquisitions, holocausts, aushwitz'. Absolute worst people on earth.
13:33 the moment our lives changed forever sad
You can faintly hear someone say “OH MY GOD” As the woman began reporting the story
This footage was used in the film United 93 (2006)
Who cares what the president has to say nothing he didn't even do anything to help worst president ever horrible goofball a joke
Haunts me.
I'm still heartbroken because of the loss of life. I was at work in Seffner,FL. I shut my computer down,and the people in my office asked...what are doing? I told them I was going home to be with my family. They didn't realize that this was an act of war. 😢💔🙏
News anchor was wrong to suggest navigation was a possibility after the second plane. No doubt it was terrorism, no accident. You could see the way it came in it was driven with malice at top speed.
Back then news had integrity and facts. Also pre-9/11 people didn't assume mallace as they do now.
@@Oh-Ben No there were other reporters that day who instantly knew it was an intentional act. The dope even said, "possibly the fuselage stayed in those upper floors." He's not that sharp.
There was originally a possibility - a very remote possibility, but still - that the first plane had suffered a catastrophic loss of cabin pressure that had rendered the pilots unconscious and left it careening uncontrolled around the airspace until it crashed; an unfortunate example of such a crash was Helios Flight 522. A lot of reporters _and laymen_ however seem to think that Air Traffic Control somehow physically controls aircraft in some way. They don't seem to understand that ATC merely orders pilots where and in which direction to fly, and no airline transport pilot would ever in a billion years accept an order that took them that close to a tall building they could clearly see.
@@Oh-Ben Terrorism was well established even in 2001. The towers were attacked 8 years prior. Now you have 2 planes committing suicide within 18 minutes of each other. The second plane ruled out any possibility it was anything else. No accident happens twice within such a short time. He is either in denial or lacked the courage to be honest with his viewers. Poor.
@@demonhalo67when the first plane hit did you know what was happining no one had a idea what it was I thought the pilot took a stroke or a heartatack
Howd u find these dude ive been looking i wanted to find this but like 30 minutes before it happened
There is a 4 hr you tube of the day of and it starts about 30-45 minutes prior to the first hijacking
In retrospect, I commend CNN for how they broke into a commercial to put this out. (This is what I had on when the story broke, though I was in another room listening to it).
I've looked at a lot of the others. Some of them were hesitant, it now seems. NBC and "The Today Show" was downright peculiar, concluding an interview, mentioning the World Trade Center, but not what happened, like a teaser for the next segment, and then going to commercials before coming back.
That Today show clip with Matt throwing to a commercial break was down to the fact they didn't have the live camera showing the burning North Tower ready for him to show on air, and so decided to throw to a commercial, as no one knew if this was a terror attack when the first building was hit. No conspiracy, just rational logic.
Some real TV experts comment and reply 😂😂😂😂
Wow this fella Sean nailed it as he described the scene.
I said the same thing. That guy is sharp, especially considering the circumstances
@@KillingPepperoniesagree, I probably would barely be able to sputter out any words because I’d be so stunned. He’s very calm.
Electronic navigational issues. Seriously? As if pilots fly with their eyes closed?
Navigating system ? omg , come on
At the time, there was no indication that it was definitely terrorism.
20 minutes later, it was clearly intentional.
The initial reports did not indicate terorism because it wasn’t clear that is what it was.
@@nateboy1489Some people thought when the second plane hit it was footage of the first plane- until the horrified commentators said it was live and all hell was breaking loose.
@@nateboy1489 yes and he said that after the second plane hit , like come on
CNN was a little overly cautious in their reporting compared to other stations. ABC and Fox were much quicker to draw their own (correct) conclusions when Flight 175 hit the 2nd tower.
Exactly. As if pilots don't have eyes and it wasn't a clear day, in broad daylight!
Only relatively devastating? She says.
It couldn't get anymore devastating
13:30 ......he didn't see the plane coming from the right side of the picture??
A lot of people weren't paying close attention at this point. I think the second plane impacted ~18 minutes later? For the longest time it was just an ongoing fire after a plane crash. No new developments to be staring at the screen for. If you look at news coverage from other channels/sources most of them actually don't notice the second plane; just the explosion.
Those reporters are ignorant. And that wasn't a sonic boom it was probably around 20,000 gallons of kerosene. it's not going faster than the speed of sound.
43:23. The man speaking says they had no warning. I watched a Frontline doc called, The Man Who Knew, that blows that statement to crap.
There's many different view points from that day. Some show the people falling some don't. Don't get all you eggs from one place
@@golden90s57which view point shows 3000 bodies disappearing ?
I remember I was in math class and we all knew 3000 bodies missing didn’t add up to a building collapse . That was second grade , the teacher was laughing at how ridiculous it was .
Why was everyone so clueless when reporting this it was obvious it was done on purpose and it was obvious they were passenger planes propeller planes would never do that much damage.
Does the presenter thing the pilots are blind or what
What happen to Aaron Brown on cnn ?
I saw this footage as it was being broadcast I vividly remember this exact footage (although I was only four years old and didn’t really know what was going on)
every major news network was truly abysmal at reporting what was happening in front of their eyes: just wow...
They all had the problem of more airtime than verified accurate information to fill it with. This led to a lot of repetition of what little they they thought they knew mixed with speculation about what they didn't.
It's like they are reporting blind
It’s strange how many people who wasn’t watching tv said they seen a explosion and fire
English much?
@ enough to know what’s making sense here
What?
Well yea, most people wouldn’t have been looking up until they heard that explosion and saw a fireball coming out of the building
@ you could hear a plane that big come on now
Wheres pt2
It appears right at the end of this vid
Even in the moments counting down its like they knew it’ll
Happen
yes true it’s like they were trying to act stupid but we can read between the lines
Ive never heard of a us president randomly visiting a elementary school before or after 911
He was there promoting the No Child Left Behind Act - a program for underprivileged schools. Maybe you just don’t pay attention to what’s going on because they literally all do it. Obama did in 2009, Reagan & Bush visited junior highs, Trump visited a school in 2017 & Biden visited a middle school last year. Not everything is suspicious.
What are you insinuating?
@@Itstherealdeal453 I'm just saying 🤷, have you?
@@ronaldtaylor8901 He was there promoting the No Child Left Behind Act - a program for underprivileged schools. Maybe you just don’t pay attention to what’s going on because they literally all do it. Obama did in 2009, Reagan & Bush visited junior highs, Trump visited a school in 2017 & Biden visited a middle school last year. Not everything is suspicious.
He was there promoting the No Child Left Behind Act - a program for underprivileged schools. Maybe you just don’t pay attention to what’s going on because they literally all do it. Obama did in 2009, Reagan & Bush visited junior highs, Trump visited a school in 2017 & Biden visited a middle school last year. Not everything is suspicious.
No minuto 18:42 o repórter diz que recebeu fotos “INCRÍVEIS ” dos dois aviões de Lower Manhattann, um atingido cada uma das torres com 18 minutos de diferença! Eu sinceramente achei esse comentário extremamente desnecessário, visto a tragédia extrema que já se anunciava naquele momento, apenas com a perda das vidas dos passageiros e tripulantes dos aviões e das pessoas do local aonde os aviões colidiram que morreram na hora do impacto!😮😢. Muito triste 😞
Comentário grotesco!Sinto muito, mas não posso deixar de me expressar…🙏🏻⭐️🕊️🇧🇷
RAPPELEZ VOUS le maire de shansville : "pas de trace d'avion ici"
le 1 er journaliste au pentagone bob pugt: " aucun avion ne s'est craché"
AUCUNE boite noire au WTC 1 et 2 et tout et tout le reste!
C'EST EVIDENT il n'y avait pas plus d'avion de ligne nul part,
un point c'est tout,
concluez ce que vous voulez,
c'est la pensée universelle qui le dit, pas moi,
tout les annalyses mènent à cet évidence .
@@ttittoune3 sinto muito mas não tem tradução para sua resposta
Então traduz ai Sandra o que é dito no momento que o segundo aviao se choca com a Torre?
1:50 1:51 1:52 1:53
THIS IS WHAT DENIAL SOUNDS LIKE!!
Pour une démolition contrôlée d'un bâtiment il faut :
1 - Destruction à la base .
2 - Que le bâtiment tombe droit .
3 - Des vagues d'explosions .
4 - Que le bâtiment tombe en chute libre .
5 - En petits morceaux pour l'enlèvement .
6 - Pas toucher si possible aux autres bâtis .
7 - Des bruits de détonnations et des éclairs .
8 - Du béton pulvérisé en poussière.
9 - Squibs aux étages inférieurs .
10 - Preuves chimiques dans les poussiéres .
11 - Savoir le momment axact de la chute du bâtiment .
12 - des coupes en biseaux des poutres aciers
The collapses initiated in the areas damaged by the impacts, not at the base. The tops of the towers began tipping in the direction of the greatest exterior damage, for the South Tower it was to the east, the North Tower tipped to its north. The damaged floors in the impact zones were unable to support the movement and began collapsing. The undamaged floors below the impacts were unable to stop the weight coming down upon them and collapsed in turn. In a controlled demolition, the entire structure moves downward due to the removal of support below. That did not happen in either Tower. The lower parts of the building remain in place until they are destroyed by the weight coming down from above. Each of the towers had tens of thousands of employees and workers on a daily basis, there were zero reports by anyone of the type of work required to accomplish a demolition. 23 years after the fact and there is still zero evidence that contradicts the official findings of what and how it happened.
13:27
1:12:20
the hijackers 😞
It's scarry we couldn't stop these jets. We knew they where hijacked but couldn't find them or stop them. What can we stop?
They didn't want it to be stopped
Is second Plane AA #93 or 193.
United Airlines Flight 175
A sidewinder
North Tower: AA#11
South Tower: UA#175
Pentagon: AA#77
Field(Going to White House): UA#93
Was that a meglodon?
holy shit
covering in Smoke......no body nows about DUST
Yeah really
10.00 the woman on the phone, Jeanne Yurman, seems to be the most stupid person: "just around 30 people in the area" What??? - "The north tower is the one with the observation deck: It is!" No it wasnt!
not everyone is an expert on the towers
Wow. CNN even sucked back then. Hate to say it, but Fox and friends were on the button when it happened
You’re voting for Trump, aren’t you
@@policerthought5649 you can always tell...
True. Don't care about Trump, don't care about CNN, but you had to be there that day to know how concise and accurate Fox news was that day. The scenes from inside the building, the area where the kill zone was, the horror of it--to this day, I can't find that specific footage and I've realized it's because it was probably too graphic to show anymore.
@@policerthought5649Are US citizens really not gonna vote for trump? After all the transgender thing in schools, a president with dementia, the VP saying he is as mentally capable as ever, illegals living in hotels and veterans on the streets, the VP not even being able to speak without a teleprompter. I mean im not from the US but i thought people voting for Kamala didn’t exist 😂
@@jjj-r6n Yeah you care
Bush was a class act that day.
a class idiot
He was acting in a classroom but hardly a class act
@@Larry26-f1w elaborate please
At video time 07:19, there’s a UFO near the tower, traveling at an angle. What do you think it is? I believe the first helicopters arrived a bit later..
It’s a demon .
No but I think it’s a news helicopter. I’m probably wrong .
Thats not an ufo....
Sidewinder
It looked like a big ball, but I don’t know what it is
PT time is same as mine Pt.II
Three thousand bodies….still missing
What do you mean?
Got that wrong!
@@lisamcallister6534you found them planter ???!!
@@fridazzy3871is it a language problem you’re experiencing?
@@Larry26-f1wLol go get ur brain checked bud
Dancing Israelis
That's my favorite ABBA song.
I think you mean Palestinians.
Imagine being so stupid you think Israelis would be behind this, and then dance wide in the open showing everybody they're celebrating what they did. They're so evil and smart they're able to do this and get away with it, but somehow also so stupid they dance in the open and show everybody. In reality they were filming it. Nobody was dancing. You're just a liar. Typical lying scumbag. "They cry out in pain as the strike you" is the perfect quote for what neo nazis do. They do everything they accuse jews of. Pogroms, inquisitions, holocausts, aushwitz'. Absolute worst people on earth.
Moronic anti-Semitic conspiracy loons.
How did 3000 bodies never get recovered from Ground Zero? ( asking for a friend, a mathematician)
Many bodies were cremated by the jet fuel and when the buildings collapsed the bodies were torn to shreds. Just look at the devastation.
Housing authority 🏠 Alabama USA 2024 1samuel 21:2 kjv 👿 ♌🦁 six of wands eternal rooted black 🖤🐈⬛ lives matter
Actually the political people stupid, they are not care about are people! 😢