1. This video does not show an in-depth comparison. 2. Sorry, but with that $2,000 price difference, the Leica already comes with the lens built in, while the Hasselblad does not and you have to add another $1,300 to $7,300 more for a lens (so from $3,300 to $9,300 more.) Whether or not that price difference (minimum $3,300 to $9,300 more) between the two cameras + lens is worth it, is something that only the future owners and what they are looking for can know. In my personal opinion, if someone spends the amount of money that the Leica Q3 already costs ($6,000), it is because what they are looking for and want is already the best of the best, and from that point of view I think it is worth paying the difference ($3,300 more with the XCD F4/45P lens to even $4,500 more including the top quality XCD F2.5/25V lens) and making with total confidence the jump to medium format. If both were full frame I don't think it would be worth paying the difference, but we are talking here about paying already a lot of money for a full frame or paying not too much more for a medium format Hasselblad that undoubtedly is one of the very few best beasts on the market today. I actually see the Leica Q3 more as a second body for situations that require a lot of mobility, portability and lightness. Otherwise, my choice, already in such an expense, would be the Hasselblad hands down, without a doubt.
This is not even a comparison. Hasselblad X2D 100C is a medium format camera. It wins!!!! Leica S4 should come soon and then let's see, which is is superior!!!!
I’m a Hasselblad shooter, so I enjoy thinking about each shot, planning then taking the photo, but one thing I know for sure, I would not choose a fixed focal length camera over one that can go through a wide range of focal lengths. Also the gimmick about having different focal lengths in the Q series… you lose resolution and it’s just an optical zoom basically. Both are excellent though. Street or Art is the real decision.
Nothing new here. I have both, if YOU don't, you won't find anything of substantive value in this "comparison". I'm not one to "cast shade" on other's videos (and this one was well produced) but the subject matter is simply non-sequitor and a bit pointless...... sorry, just my opinion.
Apples vs oranges and not really a comparison. We found the slick presentation with the in your face menacing/pretentious street photographer hilarious.
1. This video does not show an in-depth comparison.
2. Sorry, but with that $2,000 price difference, the Leica already comes with the lens built in, while the Hasselblad does not and you have to add another $1,300 to $7,300 more for a lens (so from $3,300 to $9,300 more.)
Whether or not that price difference (minimum $3,300 to $9,300 more) between the two cameras + lens is worth it, is something that only the future owners and what they are looking for can know.
In my personal opinion, if someone spends the amount of money that the Leica Q3 already costs ($6,000), it is because what they are looking for and want is already the best of the best, and from that point of view I think it is worth paying the difference ($3,300 more with the XCD F4/45P lens to even $4,500 more including the top quality XCD F2.5/25V lens) and making with total confidence the jump to medium format.
If both were full frame I don't think it would be worth paying the difference, but we are talking here about paying already a lot of money for a full frame or paying not too much more for a medium format Hasselblad that undoubtedly is one of the very few best beasts on the market today.
I actually see the Leica Q3 more as a second body for situations that require a lot of mobility, portability and lightness. Otherwise, my choice, already in such an expense, would be the Hasselblad hands down, without a doubt.
It’s rubbish comparison. These two cameras are not for the same purpose
Today I just got my q3 43, my next goal is to having a hassle blade x2d
This is not even a comparison.
Hasselblad X2D 100C is a medium format camera.
It wins!!!!
Leica S4 should come soon and then let's see, which is is superior!!!!
S4 will never appear in his old form. Wait for it!
I’m a Hasselblad shooter, so I enjoy thinking about each shot, planning then taking the photo, but one thing I know for sure, I would not choose a fixed focal length camera over one that can go through a wide range of focal lengths. Also the gimmick about having different focal lengths in the Q series… you lose resolution and it’s just an optical zoom basically. Both are excellent though. Street or Art is the real decision.
Have you ever had either camera in hand? All you say can be found in spec sheets.
It’s like comparing a guitar with a bass!!😂😂😂
This guy doesn’t even have his own videos.
Nothing new here. I have both, if YOU don't, you won't find anything of substantive value in this "comparison". I'm not one to "cast shade" on other's videos (and this one was well produced) but the subject matter is simply non-sequitor and a bit pointless...... sorry, just my opinion.
Apples vs oranges and not really a comparison.
We found the slick presentation with the in your face menacing/pretentious street photographer hilarious.
annoying AI videos in my feed -.-
This is not a real comparison. 33x44 vs. 24x36, interchange lenses vs. built-in .... this doesnt work. Q3/43 is a expensive toy for amateurs.
The Q3 43 is a tempter. But the X2D is a champ, but . . .
The Q3 is a $6K camera with a FIXED lens. Sounds like a dud straightaway.
I keep my Q3 43
Choose ISLAM. ISLAM is right 4 u
ISLAMB IS A PED0-FILE RELIGION