Closing Arguments for Randall Bailey's Murder Trial
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ส.ค. 2024
- Here are the closing arguments of Randall Bailey's murder trial. ME Elizabeth Rodgers provided mistaken testimony. She wrote a letter to the judge indicating she made an error while on the stand. DA Arthur Branch didn't find it exculpatory and Jack McCoy insisted on providing this letter to the defense attorney and the judge. As a result, Jack was taken off the case and Connie Rubirosa provided closing arguments.
I love how she ends up stabbing the book exactly 13 times.
Straight out of the Jack McCoy playbook
I love that Connie took a leaf straight out of Jack's playbook and "demonstrated" the impact of the defendant's crime. Heck she even used the same side of the table to do so.
I noticed something different about the court officers. Also i liked that Jeromy Sisto pulled a Jerry Orbach here. Starring as a defense attorney before taking on a main role as a cop.
This was a homage to a case in Riverside California where a DDA banged on a law book with a hammer 11 times to show how hard and how many times a defendant bludgeoned a man to death in 1980.
Powerful closing statement by the lady DA. She hammered the last nail in the coffin for the defendant.
One of my favorite ones in L&O. I especially love how she actually stabbed the book 13 times like the defendant did with his murder.
ADA Connie Rubirosa
RayJayRob or the last stab in the book 😉😉
RayJayRob Gotta love her!
It was interesting and very effective but can someone do something like that in the courtroom? Is it allowed to re-enact the scene like this?
Rubirosa's closing argument was Grade-A fantastic.
after that show of asst dist attorney stabbing that knife in the book..over and over..he was DONE.
"DA Arthur Branch didn't find it exculpatory and Jack McCoy insisted on providing this letter to the defense attorney and the judge. As a result, Jack was taken off the case and Connie Rubirosa provided closing arguments."
This is prosecutorial misconduct. And would mean a retrial on Appeal if it ever comes to light. The prosecution doesn't get to decide what evidence is or isn't exculpatory - that's a decision for the judge and the jury.
Wow she might have topped McCoy in this one!!!
One Episode later Jeremy Sisto became a Member of the Main Cast
Oh my god :) Connie is such a boss in this episode! This is why I love this character.
Amy Maton Two things I like about Rubirosa: 1. She tells it like it is, and 2. She calls 'em like she sees 'em. She's a firework!
By far, one of my favorite Connie moments ever!
At 2:51, talk about not going down quietly.
Talk about a sore loser!
The words of a sore loser
Inside voices in a courtroom. I wonder if bailey has the juice to see dilwyn thrown off the bench.
I love Rubirosa
Ça c’est quand elle a dit non ! Sa lui a coûté ça ok continuez
Is it wrong I found that angry knife statement kinda hot?
FNGLHR we’ll see you on SVU at some point in the future?
@TheObsessivePerson Connie totally rocked! Her best scene IMHO
Geaux, girl!
She did better than McCoy lol
if only the prosecution was this good for the Zimmerman trial.
was it Deadlock or Captive?
anybody know which episode McCoy gave his last closing summation in? was it Public Service Homicide?
The defendant went on to LA Law!
SEE THE MAIN QUESTION IS AND WHO FORCED HER TO LIVE 10 YEARS AND MORE SINGING TO HIM....HOW MANY SONGS DO YOU NEED IN THE ARAB WORLD TO TELL ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS, SEE THAT'S WHEN THE RIGHT ANSWER COME THOSE 'CHRISTAINS' GIRLS TOLD HER HE WASN'T TELLING 'EXACTLY' WHAT HE WAS FEELING....OTHERS TELL MUCH MORE DIFFERENT STUFF IN TIME I GUESS?
WTF?
The honorable judge Bluth presiding.
It hard enough cutting up meat as it is .. especially with a half blunt knife .. it's actually really a prick of a job.
feisty
Jeffrey tambor