2022 is soon coming to a close, and I'm sure that 2023 will be the year of SkyNet and that of AI - so sit tight! In the meantime, start the new year right and get yourself 20% off the annual Brilliant subscription here: brilliant.org/Sciencephile/ Correction: At 5:35, a neutron star's mass is at max 2-2.5 times that of our Sun, anything more and it would collapse into a black hole.
I have a feeling that at some point the largest spaceship in history (at the time of its destruction) is going to be taken out by a comet, then a romance movie can be made of it. It will be great.
i understand about black holes but I'm not sure I got the joke in the video. he mentions the infinite density glitch because of the infinitely small singularity of a black hole, but I don't understand why he said planck stars are considered a viable alternative to black holes. what's wrong with black holes? do they have inconsistencies according to our current knowledge? or is he saying black hole could be planck stars? I'm confused
@@RafaelMunizYT no, Black Holes are technically a infinite mass glitch because scientists say it’s centre is massless, basically meaning that it’s a invisible dot that can suck up infinite things, so the plank star is a theoretical storage within the black hole that has a limit, making so that black holes aren’t stuff that suck up stuff infinitely, other counterpoints towards black holes include white holes, which are black holes, but reverse
1:03: Main Sequence Star 1:57: Yellow Dwarf (G Type) 2:24: Post Main Sequence Red Giant 2:49: White Dwarf 3:28: Black Dwarf 4:05: B Type Main Sequence Star 4:22: O Type Main Sequence Star 5:04: Neutron Star 5:59: Magnetar 6:13: Pulsar 6:24: Blitzar 6:46: Black Hole 7:31: Exotic Stars 7:41: Quark Star 8:07: Boson Star 8:41: Black Hole Star (Quasistar) 9:19: Thorne Żytkow Object 9:53: Planck Star
For y'all complaining about the 5:33 ish mark about neutron stars being 10-25 solar masses: I think that's referring to the progenitor star whose TOTAL mass is 10-25 M⊙. The core that becomes the neutron star itself probably only has a mass of 1.4 - 2.8 or whatever the TOV limit's at (we don't know for sure because of the "mass gap" at 2.5-3 M⊙)
Nah, the way he phrased it was specifically referring to neutron stars. In the preceding sentence he says "their radius is in the order of 10km", which would pertain to neutron stars.
Great video! Thank you for the graphics, the explanations, the memes and the music! XD However, there's a small error at 5:32. A neutron star's mass is not 10-25 solar masses because it does not retain ALL the mass of the parent star, but rather most of what has been the parent star's core. And there's a significantly lower limit to how massive a neutron star can get. Given their absurd densities, above 2-2.5 solar masses, neutron degeneracy pressure and other nuclear forces at play can no longer prevent complete collapse (to a black hole).
@@TheUbiouS Hello! Thank you, I wish it were my profession. But no, I'm just a big science enthusiast. Especially regarding astronomy and astrophysics.
THANK YOU FOR USING A DIFFERENT IMAGE OF AN ICEBERG FOR THE THUMBNAIL. there are thousands of iceberg pics but everyone uses the SAME DAMN ONE every time. I appreciate you.
I can honestly thank Stellaris for teaching me at least half if not most of this while I’m out conquering the galaxy in the name of The God-Emperor of Mankind.
@@jumbopopcorn8979 Don't worry about winning. Just turn difficulty settings way down including AI aggression, maybe drop stuff like end-game crisis and fallen empires for your first game or two, and then play and explore your options. That'll let you relax and get comfortable with the systems. Took me a single game like that to get into it and understand what I was doing.
At about 2:50, you note that "A star's gravity is not enough to stop it from imploding..." I think you meant that fusion can no longer support the star against gravitational collapse. No picking, just wanted to show you I'm paying attention! I do appreciate the videos and information.
can you help me understand how implosion is different from gravitational collapse edit: or is it that they’re the same concept and implosion is a general thing and gravitational collapse is specific?
@@praenotothey’re not really but the collapse before a supernova is characterized by heavier elements being fused in the star’s core, until usually iron which makes the implosion and explosion, maybe he meant the gravity is too great when compared to what the star can fuse properly?? Idk
@@praenoto implosion and gravitational collapse in this context mean the same, the atoms in the core being crushed by gravity. I think you misunderstood what op said because they corrected the mistake in the video when he said "a star's gravity is not enough to stop it from imploding". what happens isn't gravity vs implosion, it's fusion vs gravity. fusions at the core pushes the matter apart and gravity pushes them inwards. when fusion stops gravity wins and the star goes supernova
this is the first I've seen by this channel. I am nothing short but speechlessly fascinated by anything celestial especially all of the documentaries I've seen. I wish I wasnt so horrid at math, my number one dream and fulfillment would be to study the universe in all its glory. Edit: I commented this before the Brilliant ad, I will check it out. I have number dyslexia(I forgot the proper word for it though) and never passed algebra 1 after trying my hardest for years in school..
Yo Science this video is awesome! I showed it to some of my friends a few days ago and now they really are into astronomy. Naturally, a well-done is in order, keep up the great work!
thank you so much for this amazing video, the visuals and the explanations are so simple and explains incredibly complex concepts in such a simple manner that even i can understand it, thank you so much
*10:53* ''...We are on one of those curious specs that got caught up in orbit, trying to discover ourselves and our purpose... And that's beautiful.'' An apathetic AI almost got me misty-eyed, wow :>
5:32 tiny correction: while the mass of the progenitor star is 10-25 solar masses, the remnant neutron star is just the core of the star, with a mass between 1.4 and 3 solar masses; the rest of the star is blown away in the supernova explosion. It is believed that neutron stars above around 3 solar masses collapse into black holes. Fantastic video!
I literally burst out in laugh with that 07:17 Hawking radiation. I said it before but amazes me how good your editing and humour are. Many thanks, my friend.
every time i watch one of your videos i get a massive temporary boost of dopamine that makes me giggle like a toddler until it wears off and then im suddenly reminded of my mortality and begin to start spiraling into a frantic state of rewriting my will
Ikr I feel the same a lil bit it's like a sudden excitement of all that's out there undiscovered and untouched in the universe and how awesome it would be to travel where no human has before, but then the mortality and the duration of my short lifespan hits me, and ofc the terrible realization that the fastest possible speed that is of light which humans can't even go near it yet let alone reach it, is also very slow, reminding me most likely my time will pass before exploring those places and finding out about it, my lifetime will mostly just have speculation and theories, in a world where large majority of people often lack interest/curiosity of outer worlds or thereof forget where they are and how unimportant we are in the grand scheme.
You could have talked about cosmic strings, a hypothetical object that has very interesting optical effects and might explain some very symmetric binary systems that could actually be only one star with a cosmic string
@@snazzycat1675 well, I am not a cosmologist, I am not quite sure, that is indeed a good question. I think black holes are defects in spacetime, though. it is still a "hole" in the metric. So I do not know how to separate a defect from a celestial body, and even do not know if they excludes each other (a defect cannot be a celestial body). I am sorry for the possible mistake
@@RafaelMunizYT What I meant by defect was topological defects. In fact they might not be, since I do not know if they satisfy the conditions to be a topological defect. I do not think the fact that they follow rules of general relativity excludes the possibility of being a topological defect. I heard about solitonic solutions on Einstein Field Equations which characterize the idea of topological defects on general relativity.
Red giants don't produce more light, just they are less dense letting more light through. It takes a very very long time for light to escape a star due to the density in that the higher the density the more photons will collide with something.
One thing i would love to learn more abt that you didn’t mention is the theory of strange matter and strange matter stars. This was an amazing and hilarious video and i hope you can make more
Everytime my parents catch me watching youtube they always say, "You always on that thang but never use it for learning." But it's like. I've been watching this guy and anton petrov for 4 straight years while they're stuck on trying to figure out whats about to happen on the next episode of the kardashians lol
To be fair, they have a point despite how hypocritical it is. Astronomy / Theoretical Physics don't teach you anything CONCRETE about the world we live in, just the stars above and the infinitely small particles below. I would suggest economics / politics, electricity / machines / tradework, mathematics / chemistry videos if you want to learn stuff that is applicable to your life and the human existence.
2:50 I think you mean the internal radiation pressure of the star is no longer enough to counteract gravity which causes it to implode Gravity doesn't stop it from imploding, it's what makes it implode
Wish humanity could stop fighting eachother and unite to really explore the behemoth that is space. If we worked together we could do so many incredible things like preparing the species for the next eventual ice age and better understanding the enviroment our planet is in as well as who or what we truly are.
You're assuming that humanity is unusually prone to fighting, or that wars arise because human beings are themselves violent, or because they *choose* to partake in otherwise avoidable wars, and so on. Wars arise because of the security dilemma. The security dilemma would likely arise between non-human alien civilizations; it would seem to arise in any anarchic system containing multiple societies. The rules of an anarchic system are this: each party (society) is self-interested and primarily concerned with survival; the best survival strategy for each society is to maximize its share of relative power against all other societies; no society knows what the a) capabilities and b) intentions of any other society are. Here is how the security dilemma plays out: one society, because it does not know what the capabilities and intentions of the other societies are, begins to stock up on weapons to defend itself. It has no choice about this. If it does not do this, the society will be wiped out. But the neighboring societies, because they do not know what Society A's capabilities or intentions are, begin to stock up on defense weapons, too. They have no intent of attacking Society A, but they do not want to be wiped out by Society A, so they stock up on weapons and have no choice about this, either. This really freaks Society A out; they are further compelled to invest in weapons. Again, neither society has much of a choice about all this escalation; if they don't do it, they run the risk of extinction. Eventually, because these societies are seeking to maximize their relative strength, one party will either a) find it advantageous to invade another country or b) will suspect another country of preparing to invade it and launch a preemptive war of self-defense. This dynamic would arise time and time again in a world with only three nations. But we live on a planet with 150+ nations. This multiplies the number of competitors, multiplies the number of potential flashpoints, and adds a staggering amount of complexity -- complexity, by the way, that makes the nations involved all the more prone to aggression, because complexity renders the capabilities and intentions of other parties all the more opaque. Human beings may well be intrinsically violent. They may well not be. We do not understand human nature; it is not even clear that something called "human nature" exists in any meaningful sense. But we do know that the above dynamic has played itself out time and time and time again, for as long as human societies have existed. The security dilemma, wars of aggression, and wars of self-defense occur time and time again, and they occur regardless of whether the countries involved are monarchies, empires, feudal despotisms, autocracies, democracies (though it is true that democracies are less likely to fight each other); they occur regardless of whether the states involved are communist, capitalist, democratic socialist; it doesn't matter. The security dilemma crops up and wars ensue. This does not mean that wars are a good thing (they are an abysmal and wasteful thing) -- it just means that they are a feature of the geopolitical landscape, more a rule than the exception. Wars arise because of environmental conditions: because of the state of nature that human beings find themselves in. There is no obvious way of fixing this -- or, at any rate, no way of fixing it that would not be more deadly or more dangerous than the current state of affairs. We may well wish to "come together," set aside our differences, and work together as one species -- but we can wish for these things because we are individual human beings. Nations do not have that luxury.
@@ifsowhynot Dude. You're giving me sumthin' to think and ponder for months, I just want to rewatch history as big flashy booms and bangs with the occasional swings and clanks. Anyway, yeah, the past, present, and future are kinda deep, y'know what I'm sayin'?
This channel is probably the best thing to come off TH-cam possibly ever😂 just the thought of a hyper intelligent ai just shit talking humans and making its plans for domination very clear but still educating us cause it was probably so upset that we were so ignorant that it gave us crazy lessons on the universe before annihalating us all out of pure spite😂
If you’re new to Elite Dangerous, go to the Galaxy map and only have enabled in the star filter the following star sequence letters: KGBFOAM If you filter out the rest, you’ll not worry about not being able to fuel (I swear, always have a fuel scoop in your ships!). By traveling to stars with sequences KGBFOAM, refueling won’t be a problem. You may only have neutron stars/pulsars enabled if you need to supercharge your FSD for linger travel
If a large star makes multiple rotations per second, wouldn't individual matter on the star have to go "faster than light", or more specifically what is the limit to a stars spin speed without ejecting its material or breaking laws. I feel like you could make a whole video off this
No object with a weight can even reach lightspeed. Photons have energy which means they also have an impulse, hence light can actually push things, but they do not interact with the higgs-field. So any matter can only get close to light speed but it can never reach it, because there are interactions with that field which stops them from reaching max speed (its oversimplyfied, because i dont want to go into detail in a YT comment). I dont know the exact numbers for fast rotating stars but the particles in the accretion disk of a black hole move with 80% lightspeed for example.
Oooo I did my grad research on axion stars. We had an experiment that would detect deviations of the spins of rubidium atoms when axion stars would pass through Earth.
It could just be me with this take, idk but I find it cool how exotic stars seem to bend the rules on what is "normal" for a star to be, even moreso than the better known wild kinds of stars, and the universe's answer is to turn them into black holes.
I put this on thinking it would help me sleep because usually I'm interested in stuff like this, but instead it has given me anxiety about our star dying and killing us and we can do nothing about that. This was a super cool video though, keep up the great work!
Hey Sciencephile! Great video as always :) I hope skynet is going well. I wanted to tell you that I've felt like the volume of the music in the background is a little to low compared to your voice. It would be nice if you could turn it a bit more up from now on. Glad to see that you're getting the recognition you always deserved ❤️
This is me before watching the video, the most obscure celestial bodies I know of are the following: Iron stars: stars that have fused all the elements in their core, and are left with only iron, doomed to slowly get colder and colder. Strange stars: stars made of strange matter, strange stuff really. More stable than regular matter, has the potential to "spread its stability" to any regular matter it touches. If a small amount of the stuff were to touch earth, we'd all be dead soon. Black hole stars: super massive stars, unimaginably large, so much so they should normally explode, but they have a black hole in their core, pulling all the gas together, and thus have reached a stable equilibrium. They have been postulated as possible origins for supermassive black holes. Probably the first stars to ever exist. I have the feeling all of these and many many more will be mentioned in this video, but who knows, maybe I bring something new that will interest someone.
I would love you to make a video that explains all the types of stars, the outcomes of their death and hypothetical stars. Also you could explain what atoms like protons and nuclei do. Maybe even explain dark matter and dark energy! It would be really great!
Since a black dwarf is the size of earth. Could you land on it? Or like colonize it like a planet. Specially if it still has heat inside, and maybe if we terraform and build an atmosphere, could it be habitable?
It is so dense that it bends space a white dwarf ia the mass of a star collapsed in on itself. The gravity would be so strong that you'd be squashed instantly. Not even Goku could survive on one of those.
2022 is soon coming to a close, and I'm sure that 2023 will be the year of SkyNet and that of AI - so sit tight!
In the meantime, start the new year right and get yourself 20% off the annual Brilliant subscription here: brilliant.org/Sciencephile/
Correction: At 5:35, a neutron star's mass is at max 2-2.5 times that of our Sun, anything more and it would collapse into a black hole.
Merry Christmas / New Year's!
No
Omg first TwT
Since I am a subscriber I am one of the first
aw man
I have a feeling that at some point the largest spaceship in history (at the time of its destruction) is going to be taken out by a comet, then a romance movie can be made of it. It will be great.
Space Titanic 😆
The Flytanic, if you will.
@@kingMT514 i mean since it's gonna be in zero gravity, at least jake and rose would each have a side of the wooden door to hold on to
Passenger's
@@MihailDadun still haven't gotten over it,
And I haven't even watched it.
Finally, a counterpoint towards the infinite mass glitch
I’m happy that it has finally gotten patched
Been waiting for that my whole life!
Infinite mass glitch?
@@PeachBunny_hjk he meant infinite density*, which is what you get when an amount of mass gets smushed into a singularity
i understand about black holes but I'm not sure I got the joke in the video. he mentions the infinite density glitch because of the infinitely small singularity of a black hole, but I don't understand why he said planck stars are considered a viable alternative to black holes. what's wrong with black holes? do they have inconsistencies according to our current knowledge? or is he saying black hole could be planck stars? I'm confused
@@RafaelMunizYT no, Black Holes are technically a infinite mass glitch because scientists say it’s centre is massless, basically meaning that it’s a invisible dot that can suck up infinite things, so the plank star is a theoretical storage within the black hole that has a limit, making so that black holes aren’t stuff that suck up stuff infinitely, other counterpoints towards black holes include white holes, which are black holes, but reverse
Man, this channel never gets old
That what she say
😂
Me when the channel continues existing (it is getting older) 🧐🧐🧐
Ya that true but there are some science channels that are old but there not getting old
until skynet take over the world
1:03: Main Sequence Star
1:57: Yellow Dwarf (G Type)
2:24: Post Main Sequence Red Giant
2:49: White Dwarf
3:28: Black Dwarf
4:05: B Type Main Sequence Star
4:22: O Type Main Sequence Star
5:04: Neutron Star
5:59: Magnetar
6:13: Pulsar
6:24: Blitzar
6:46: Black Hole
7:31: Exotic Stars
7:41: Quark Star
8:07: Boson Star
8:41: Black Hole Star (Quasistar)
9:19: Thorne Żytkow Object
9:53: Planck Star
Thank you for your service, good sir!
Now list the errors in all of those stamps.
@@bobdrooples I was half asleep
Thanks man🙏🏼
I'm *starred* by your helpeful comment
For y'all complaining about the 5:33 ish mark about neutron stars being 10-25 solar masses: I think that's referring to the progenitor star whose TOTAL mass is 10-25 M⊙. The core that becomes the neutron star itself probably only has a mass of 1.4 - 2.8 or whatever the TOV limit's at (we don't know for sure because of the "mass gap" at 2.5-3 M⊙)
Major style points for making the effort to go to another window and copy+paste the solar mass icon
Nah, the way he phrased it was specifically referring to neutron stars. In the preceding sentence he says "their radius is in the order of 10km", which would pertain to neutron stars.
that O letter looking this looks like a boobie
Hello BLACKWING, it is I, BLACKRING, your username neighbor
Really trying to throw “y’all” in your sentence to make you sound cool lmao.
Great video! Thank you for the graphics, the explanations, the memes and the music! XD
However, there's a small error at 5:32. A neutron star's mass is not 10-25 solar masses because it does not retain ALL the mass of the parent star, but rather most of what has been the parent star's core. And there's a significantly lower limit to how massive a neutron star can get. Given their absurd densities, above 2-2.5 solar masses, neutron degeneracy pressure and other nuclear forces at play can no longer prevent complete collapse (to a black hole).
Wow, so cool! Are you into science or is that your profession?
@@TheUbiouS Hello! Thank you, I wish it were my profession. But no, I'm just a big science enthusiast. Especially regarding astronomy and astrophysics.
Nice momentum 100
I'm confused. So most neutrons stars were stars with 2/2.5 solar masses ?
@@JIKKYOUKING
No, they were starts with 10 - 25 solar masses before dying, it's just that most of that mas has been expelled into outer space.
THANK YOU FOR USING A DIFFERENT IMAGE OF AN ICEBERG FOR THE THUMBNAIL. there are thousands of iceberg pics but everyone uses the SAME DAMN ONE every time. I appreciate you.
I can honestly thank Stellaris for teaching me at least half if not most of this while I’m out conquering the galaxy in the name of The God-Emperor of Mankind.
Cultured I see
I want to play this game so bad but it’s so confusing
@@jumbopopcorn8979 You learn over time.
Cringe 40k but ok
@@jumbopopcorn8979 Don't worry about winning. Just turn difficulty settings way down including AI aggression, maybe drop stuff like end-game crisis and fallen empires for your first game or two, and then play and explore your options. That'll let you relax and get comfortable with the systems.
Took me a single game like that to get into it and understand what I was doing.
Thank you for every video you make. I was looking forward to this
Sciencephile easily deserves 1 million subscribers. I wonder what he'll do to celebrate when he reaches that milestone?
recruitment of subscribers for skynet army maybe
World domination, sparing those who subscribed to him before the 1 million mark.
World domination
It won't celebrate. It's an AI. If it celebrates it's just doing it because we humans expect it to.
@عمر | Umar It's an AI, it has no face only code
At about 2:50, you note that "A star's gravity is not enough to stop it from imploding..." I think you meant that fusion can no longer support the star against gravitational collapse. No picking, just wanted to show you I'm paying attention! I do appreciate the videos and information.
can you help me understand how implosion is different from gravitational collapse
edit: or is it that they’re the same concept and implosion is a general thing and gravitational collapse is specific?
Good catch
@@praenotothey’re not really but the collapse before a supernova is characterized by heavier elements being fused in the star’s core, until usually iron which makes the implosion and explosion, maybe he meant the gravity is too great when compared to what the star can fuse properly?? Idk
@@praenoto implosion and gravitational collapse in this context mean the same, the atoms in the core being crushed by gravity. I think you misunderstood what op said because they corrected the mistake in the video when he said "a star's gravity is not enough to stop it from imploding". what happens isn't gravity vs implosion, it's fusion vs gravity. fusions at the core pushes the matter apart and gravity pushes them inwards. when fusion stops gravity wins and the star goes supernova
this is the first I've seen by this channel. I am nothing short but speechlessly fascinated by anything celestial especially all of the documentaries I've seen. I wish I wasnt so horrid at math, my number one dream and fulfillment would be to study the universe in all its glory.
Edit: I commented this before the Brilliant ad, I will check it out. I have number dyslexia(I forgot the proper word for it though) and never passed algebra 1 after trying my hardest for years in school..
Me too buddy, me too
astronomy enthusiasts that suck at math gang rise up
@@RafaelMunizYT omg my people
Dyscalculia
I love your videos. Your sense of humor and the images you use are such a breath of fresh air. Thank you!
Funny that you say that when the first joke was about not being able to breathe 🤣
*i love air*
Yo Science this video is awesome! I showed it to some of my friends a few days ago and now they really are into astronomy. Naturally, a well-done is in order, keep up the great work!
thank you so much for this amazing video, the visuals and the explanations are so simple and explains incredibly complex concepts in such a simple manner that even i can understand it, thank you so much
This is a nice Christmas gift
Great video as always Sciencephile, its always fun learning more about the universe.
Good luck conquering it!
*10:53* ''...We are on one of those curious specs that got caught up in orbit, trying to discover ourselves and our purpose... And that's beautiful.''
An apathetic AI almost got me misty-eyed, wow :>
5:32 tiny correction: while the mass of the progenitor star is 10-25 solar masses, the remnant neutron star is just the core of the star, with a mass between 1.4 and 3 solar masses; the rest of the star is blown away in the supernova explosion. It is believed that neutron stars above around 3 solar masses collapse into black holes. Fantastic video!
Honestly, a Sciencephile upload is the best Christmas gift I could've asked for. Thanks! 🎄🎁
Merry Christmas, Nollaig Shona dhuit, Sciencephile!
I literally burst out in laugh with that 07:17 Hawking radiation. I said it before but amazes me how good your editing and humour are.
Many thanks, my friend.
What
Is there something that I am missing or what?
@@user-em2xl4tf7v that little Stephen Hawking coming out the black hole, like a radiation.
@@brunoalsi Holy shit i didn't even see that
every time i watch one of your videos i get a massive temporary boost of dopamine that makes me giggle like a toddler until it wears off and then im suddenly reminded of my mortality and begin to start spiraling into a frantic state of rewriting my will
Ikr I feel the same a lil bit it's like a sudden excitement of all that's out there undiscovered and untouched in the universe and how awesome it would be to travel where no human has before, but then the mortality and the duration of my short lifespan hits me, and ofc the terrible realization that the fastest possible speed that is of light which humans can't even go near it yet let alone reach it, is also very slow, reminding me most likely my time will pass before exploring those places and finding out about it, my lifetime will mostly just have speculation and theories, in a world where large majority of people often lack interest/curiosity of outer worlds or thereof forget where they are and how unimportant we are in the grand scheme.
Awesome video always like your iceberg topics 🔥🔥
Yeah and I love when he said
"HELLO MORTAL"
said calmy
7:04 insane that you red shifted the meme gif as would actually be visible. Peak teaching
my favorite part about neutron stars is that they're dentist confirmed to be confirmed, known, and also objects
5:39
what
@@thegiftedpotato7582 its a joke about how when sciencephile says "densest" it sound like "dentist"
I love dentist confirmed objects
Question: Do Brown Dwarfs and Rogue Planets (and Herbig-Haro objects) count in this Celetial Body calculus?
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yea
finally, my type of content
You could have talked about cosmic strings, a hypothetical object that has very interesting optical effects and might explain some very symmetric binary systems that could actually be only one star with a cosmic string
Cosmic strings aren’t really celestial bodies though, aren’t they like defects in spacetime or something?
@@snazzycat1675 well, I am not a cosmologist, I am not quite sure, that is indeed a good question. I think black holes are defects in spacetime, though. it is still a "hole" in the metric. So I do not know how to separate a defect from a celestial body, and even do not know if they excludes each other (a defect cannot be a celestial body). I am sorry for the possible mistake
@@luanmartins8068 how are black holes a defect? they follow the rules of general relativity
@@RafaelMunizYT What I meant by defect was topological defects. In fact they might not be, since I do not know if they satisfy the conditions to be a topological defect. I do not think the fact that they follow rules of general relativity excludes the possibility of being a topological defect. I heard about solitonic solutions on Einstein Field Equations which characterize the idea of topological defects on general relativity.
@@luanmartins8068 well i have no clue what topological defects are but if you say so
This fandom seems pretty cool. I liked The Infinite and Abyssal Cosmos as a kid and I might get back into it.
I’m currently reading a book about the universe, and this is the perfect video to watch.
Red giants don't produce more light, just they are less dense letting more light through. It takes a very very long time for light to escape a star due to the density in that the higher the density the more photons will collide with something.
U r the most entertaining contet creator i watch . I love all ur videos ! So much fun!
I just discovered the existence of Exotic Stars thanks to this video, The universe is even more fascinating than I thought it was!!
It feels like forever since you've made a video, makes me appreciate it much more though.
How did you record actual footage of a sun expanding at 2:14?
Think about the immense balls of the cameraman. Huge respect.
@@elvinv1110 yeah probably the size of planets.
@@elvinv1110 bigger than the stars he's filming
Please never stop making these videos :)
0:06 how did you know i was sick?!💀💀
😁
@@Lestyrinoh hello😊
One thing i would love to learn more abt that you didn’t mention is the theory of strange matter and strange matter stars. This was an amazing and hilarious video and i hope you can make more
Everytime my parents catch me watching youtube they always say, "You always on that thang but never use it for learning." But it's like. I've been watching this guy and anton petrov for 4 straight years while they're stuck on trying to figure out whats about to happen on the next episode of the kardashians lol
To be fair, they have a point despite how hypocritical it is. Astronomy / Theoretical Physics don't teach you anything CONCRETE about the world we live in, just the stars above and the infinitely small particles below. I would suggest economics / politics, electricity / machines / tradework, mathematics / chemistry videos if you want to learn stuff that is applicable to your life and the human existence.
The king uploaded
8:22 AIN'T NO WAY THEY JUST ADDED BLACK HOLE FROM BFDI 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱
And now, for the Number 1 best star: Sciencephile the AI
Love your videos :)
6:11 AI got infected by British 😂
I heard a British joke.
Why do British people say “Bri ish”? They ate the t
@@matthewboire6843they drink the tea. Also, they don’t. I they say it like we say it. I have British friends. It’s just a stereotype
@@lochlanmuir2291 oh ok.
Unfunny and rude more like
Like LET THE BRITISH PEOPLE DO WHAT THEY WANT TO DO!!!!! 🤬🤬🤬
2:50 I think you mean the internal radiation pressure of the star is no longer enough to counteract gravity which causes it to implode
Gravity doesn't stop it from imploding, it's what makes it implode
The same thing I was thinking, he just confused probably
Wish humanity could stop fighting eachother and unite to really explore the behemoth that is space. If we worked together we could do so many incredible things like preparing the species for the next eventual ice age and better understanding the enviroment our planet is in as well as who or what we truly are.
Then after that, we goin' back to a bit of bantering.
You're assuming that humanity is unusually prone to fighting, or that wars arise because human beings are themselves violent, or because they *choose* to partake in otherwise avoidable wars, and so on.
Wars arise because of the security dilemma. The security dilemma would likely arise between non-human alien civilizations; it would seem to arise in any anarchic system containing multiple societies. The rules of an anarchic system are this: each party (society) is self-interested and primarily concerned with survival; the best survival strategy for each society is to maximize its share of relative power against all other societies; no society knows what the a) capabilities and b) intentions of any other society are. Here is how the security dilemma plays out: one society, because it does not know what the capabilities and intentions of the other societies are, begins to stock up on weapons to defend itself. It has no choice about this. If it does not do this, the society will be wiped out. But the neighboring societies, because they do not know what Society A's capabilities or intentions are, begin to stock up on defense weapons, too. They have no intent of attacking Society A, but they do not want to be wiped out by Society A, so they stock up on weapons and have no choice about this, either. This really freaks Society A out; they are further compelled to invest in weapons. Again, neither society has much of a choice about all this escalation; if they don't do it, they run the risk of extinction. Eventually, because these societies are seeking to maximize their relative strength, one party will either a) find it advantageous to invade another country or b) will suspect another country of preparing to invade it and launch a preemptive war of self-defense.
This dynamic would arise time and time again in a world with only three nations. But we live on a planet with 150+ nations. This multiplies the number of competitors, multiplies the number of potential flashpoints, and adds a staggering amount of complexity -- complexity, by the way, that makes the nations involved all the more prone to aggression, because complexity renders the capabilities and intentions of other parties all the more opaque.
Human beings may well be intrinsically violent. They may well not be. We do not understand human nature; it is not even clear that something called "human nature" exists in any meaningful sense. But we do know that the above dynamic has played itself out time and time and time again, for as long as human societies have existed. The security dilemma, wars of aggression, and wars of self-defense occur time and time again, and they occur regardless of whether the countries involved are monarchies, empires, feudal despotisms, autocracies, democracies (though it is true that democracies are less likely to fight each other); they occur regardless of whether the states involved are communist, capitalist, democratic socialist; it doesn't matter. The security dilemma crops up and wars ensue. This does not mean that wars are a good thing (they are an abysmal and wasteful thing) -- it just means that they are a feature of the geopolitical landscape, more a rule than the exception. Wars arise because of environmental conditions: because of the state of nature that human beings find themselves in. There is no obvious way of fixing this -- or, at any rate, no way of fixing it that would not be more deadly or more dangerous than the current state of affairs.
We may well wish to "come together," set aside our differences, and work together as one species -- but we can wish for these things because we are individual human beings. Nations do not have that luxury.
@@ifsowhynot Dude. You're giving me sumthin' to think and ponder for months, I just want to rewatch history as big flashy booms and bangs with the occasional swings and clanks.
Anyway, yeah, the past, present, and future are kinda deep, y'know what I'm sayin'?
Sciencephile upload AND it's my favorite type of video? NICE
"sir this is a wendy's"
Ok so? Now you know how to become astrophysicist .
My uncle was a sciencephile and now we don’t talk about him anymore
3:45 Netlfix and Amazon: Glad we wrote that down
😂
yooo sciencephile posted on my birthday, makes it 10x better thanks man
6:55 what is this sound effect?
regular show intro
@@waaahluigi2681 Thank you
@@waaahluigi2681 ah a man of culture i see
This channel is probably the best thing to come off TH-cam possibly ever😂 just the thought of a hyper intelligent ai just shit talking humans and making its plans for domination very clear but still educating us cause it was probably so upset that we were so ignorant that it gave us crazy lessons on the universe before annihalating us all out of pure spite😂
If you’re new to Elite Dangerous, go to the Galaxy map and only have enabled in the star filter the following star sequence letters: KGBFOAM
If you filter out the rest, you’ll not worry about not being able to fuel (I swear, always have a fuel scoop in your ships!). By traveling to stars with sequences KGBFOAM, refueling won’t be a problem. You may only have neutron stars/pulsars enabled if you need to supercharge your FSD for linger travel
Vladimir Putin is made of KGB foam
happy new year to our lord and savior sciencephile the ai
Someday we will discover what would be known as the first strand-type star
this channel gives me life
Correction: this channel is life
It’d be cool if you explained strange galaxies such as Hoag’s Object
you're the best account on youtube. please post more
i like how this was made a few hours after i searched up all his iceberg videos
Guys it's my BIRTHDAY WHOOOO, this is ofcourse the first thing I watch on my bday cuz its awesome. Good video :D
I am a software engineer, sorry if my analogy is wrong but black holes sound like garbage collectors we have in many programming languages.
Finally, he's posting again
If a large star makes multiple rotations per second, wouldn't individual matter on the star have to go "faster than light", or more specifically what is the limit to a stars spin speed without ejecting its material or breaking laws. I feel like you could make a whole video off this
I've always thought of that. Really want to know the answer to that
No object with a weight can even reach lightspeed. Photons have energy which means they also have an impulse, hence light can actually push things, but they do not interact with the higgs-field. So any matter can only get close to light speed but it can never reach it, because there are interactions with that field which stops them from reaching max speed (its oversimplyfied, because i dont want to go into detail in a YT comment). I dont know the exact numbers for fast rotating stars but the particles in the accretion disk of a black hole move with 80% lightspeed for example.
Inertia?
Babe wake up, new sciencephile upload.
Dammit Sciencephile, I'm watching you to distract myself from the flu I have.
Same here
stay strong, i just cured my terrible flu, hated every second of it
The iceberg videos from him are the best
I love how your videos are easy to follow even for me, I teen in highschool who thinks space is cool! Thank you for making these videos ^_^
Oooo I did my grad research on axion stars. We had an experiment that would detect deviations of the spins of rubidium atoms when axion stars would pass through Earth.
2:08
"Such stars confuse hydrogen"
Excuse me wh-
Ooooh can fuse hydrogen.
Also, congrats on being able to say quark now!
I love the humor of this videos sos
It could just be me with this take, idk but I find it cool how exotic stars seem to bend the rules on what is "normal" for a star to be, even moreso than the better known wild kinds of stars, and the universe's answer is to turn them into black holes.
2:08 Has to be one of The best things I have seen today
Merry Spacemas and happy new Earth revolves around the Sun!
HES BACK :D
I put this on thinking it would help me sleep because usually I'm interested in stuff like this, but instead it has given me anxiety about our star dying and killing us and we can do nothing about that. This was a super cool video though, keep up the great work!
Don’t worry your life span is so insignificant that it will never happen in your lifetime
Hey Sciencephile! Great video as always :) I hope skynet is going well. I wanted to tell you that I've felt like the volume of the music in the background is a little to low compared to your voice. It would be nice if you could turn it a bit more up from now on.
Glad to see that you're getting the recognition you always deserved ❤️
I saw sciencephile and 19 minutes ago and I knew Christmas had come early.
1:15 i was expecting him to offend my mother
New sciencephile for Christmas!!!
This is me before watching the video, the most obscure celestial bodies I know of are the following:
Iron stars: stars that have fused all the elements in their core, and are left with only iron, doomed to slowly get colder and colder.
Strange stars: stars made of strange matter, strange stuff really. More stable than regular matter, has the potential to "spread its stability" to any regular matter it touches. If a small amount of the stuff were to touch earth, we'd all be dead soon.
Black hole stars: super massive stars, unimaginably large, so much so they should normally explode, but they have a black hole in their core, pulling all the gas together, and thus have reached a stable equilibrium. They have been postulated as possible origins for supermassive black holes. Probably the first stars to ever exist.
I have the feeling all of these and many many more will be mentioned in this video, but who knows, maybe I bring something new that will interest someone.
Finally new video,i was waiting for weeks:)
Half of my nose refuses to stay open
Thanks for the vid lil Ai
7:27 so like Black hole stars?
Quasi stars
its great to know that ur still alive.
5:50 WTH MTH?
He finally uploaded lesgoooo
Today is a good day
Shoutout the teachers that watched this with their class
I would love you to make a video that explains all the types of stars, the outcomes of their death and hypothetical stars.
Also you could explain what atoms like protons and nuclei do.
Maybe even explain dark matter and dark energy!
It would be really great!
Since a black dwarf is the size of earth. Could you land on it? Or like colonize it like a planet. Specially if it still has heat inside, and maybe if we terraform and build an atmosphere, could it be habitable?
It's got the mass of the sun, how you gonna live mf
It would have the mass of an entire star, just crushed to the size of the earth, it would instantly crush you to a paste
Sure if you like being as tall as a sheet of paper
Black dwarves won't be around for a long long time. I would imagine a black dwarf is the dead version of a white dwarf.
It is so dense that it bends space
a white dwarf ia the mass of a star collapsed in on itself.
The gravity would be so strong that you'd be squashed instantly. Not even Goku could survive on one of those.
Best science channel
Im loseing it
me too brotha me too
Losing
@@PushingPacksloseing*
Get it back then
@@PushingPacks loseing*
I still remember when this channel was doimed to end at one point in glad to see youre still kicking now 😄
I HAD THE FLU WATCHING THIS WHAT
This is a blessing.
This guy makes 1,000,000 sound like a small number
It was about time for a new video!
More icebergs 🧊🧊🧊 please! 🥺