@@cardboard_is_not_edible by that I mean the galaxy itself like how they took a picture of the andromeda galaxy, like go read a book every once in a while about space😂
I think medieval cosmology is a really interesting topic (I have a big interest in history of science), because C. S. Lewis was the only author I know that wrote sci-fi based on medieval cosmology and his book Discard Image is so good. But, returning to the present, I wonder if scientists used "stupendously" to classify bigness, I wonder what's next, big chungus galaxy? Imagine galaxies measured by their degree of chungosity
To be sincerely honest in my humble opinion without being sentimental and of course, without offending you or anyone who thinks differently from my opinion but rather looking into serious matter with perspective distinction and without condemning anyone's point of view, I honestly think and do believe that I have absolutely nothing to say.
If I may be so bold as to ask you kind and humble sir whether you would be comfortable with my inquiry on how high of a number you have managed to aquire on your most recent essay that was assigned to you by your English teacher whom I am sure is very pleased with having had the opportunity to teach you the ways of the English language?
4:08 While a forgivable mistake, the correct name for the central supermassive black hole is Sagittarius A*, with an asterisk at the end. Sagittarius A (without the asterisk) refers to the region surrounding the black hole.
Caveman: hey, try to connect the stars in the sky and form shapes Other caveman: *points at a random constellation that looks like nothing but a badly peeled potato* look, that one looks like a goat Caveman: you're right
There's no need to be contemptuous of ancient civilisations for noting quite tenuous shapes in the sky. The very tendency of human beings to construct systems out of seemingly disordered appearances is precisely that which led to modern science in the first place. Modern astronomy itself would have no basis if it weren't for Babylonians and Greeks who mapped the stars and their motions diligently with the naked eye for hundreds of years, long before telescopes were invented. Also, saying that constellations resembled earthly things allowed people to memorise them better, and usually for practical purposes. Ursa major, for example, could easily be remembered by sailors and was used for navigation
"When you look out into the skies above you at night and you imagine how vast it is, it is important to understand that this universe is full of life. It is not that life only exists in remote and rare outposts amidst a vast desert of emptiness. Though there are many, many worlds that are uninhabited and uninhabitable, life has anchored itself and established itself throughout the Greater Community." A quote from - _Life in the Universe_ - by Marshall Vian Summers. A great read that's being made available free online for everyone.
Actually it was Copernicus who first thought the earth revolved around the sun and the Church accepted it as theoretically correct because it made about as much sense as the model they had (which they mostly just took from the ancient Romans) and the real issue with Galileo was that he kept criticizing the Pope even when he was working under him. In medieval society only a Court Jester is allowed to criticize a Monarch.
@@Curseycubey dude I don’t know. I actually I don’t even care that much. I just like one dragonball z and one punch man. Same goes for one piece. I really don’t care who is stronger or better. It just happens to be that I like this pfp lol
Hearing 100 light years across is a small galaxy makes me realise just how massive the universe is. Light the fastest thing in existence (as far as I know) would take 100 years to cross that galaxy which is already difficult for me to comprehend and that's not even a big galaxy. The universe is insane.
Fun fact : Pretty much all civilizations had different constellations. I have a planetarium app that can show the constellations from about a dozen different traditions. I like the Celtic one. It's a huge forest up there.
Claiming that our solar system is average is pretty off. First of all the sun is not average by far. It is in fact rather heavy. Most of the stars are red dwarfs. Second thing is, while we know that planets in general are popular, we have no idea how popular the small rocky planets in the inner core are. This is because the transit method is much better at detecting large, massive stars. Third, the models we have currently for planet formation suggest that the amount of water on earth is very, very strange. It cannot be the water the earth started with - it must have been brought afterwards, most likely by comets. But here is the fourth conundrum - to actually have life, a planet must be relatively well shielded from impacts, in our case by Moon, Jupiter and Saturn. If the global catastrophes like the one which eliminated the dinosaurs happened to often, life wouldn't have had enough time to rebuild itself, especially in the earlier stages. So the Earth was lucky to have JUST enough hits to bring the water back, but not too much, especially in later stages. Its a fine balance. But then is another point - most of the smaller, rocky planets in the galaxy are most likely tidally locked. Again, obviously, Earth is not. Then comes the zone of habitability - both solar and galactic. We are in the galactic rim, but most of the stars are in the core, which most likely isnt habitable for carbon-based life (if any other life is possible, which I as a molecular biologist, doubt. The chemistry is just against anything else). There are a lot of rare features in the solar system, and since probabilities stack multiplicatively, the cumulative probability is very, very low.
Yep we are rather unussual! Our star is heavier than 85% of all stars! Also our overall system structure is rare aswell as most known system either have hot Jupiter/neptune or no Jupiter and having a jupiter size (mass) body is really important. There even are more factors for life aswell althrough we dont know what a habitable planet really need to be habitable to any carbon based life - an ice moon might be good enough
This type of videos blow my mind, can you imagine being the first people to look out into space and realize how small we are compared to the endless amount of space?
I always thought that we are truly a really tiny part that consists a bigger one. Meaning we, not as species, but the observable universe could be an atom of a tree for example. Could be a nice plot twist to escape reality, by observing how it works bottom up. From a young age I loved reading about space from books (cause I didn't have the permission to use the internet), the concepts you went through, seemed so familiar. Nice video!
Pretty cool concept. A massive collection of veins called the tree where what we consider a universe (whole, not just observable) is just an atom or even a quark of a vein.
If there were universes in atoms ot would probably be detectable by us, or higher level beings outside the tree. It would probably be on a much smaller scale than atoms
I can’t imagine looking in the sky with basically 0% light pollution, would be so beautiful, wanna see it but there is no places near me with little light pollution 😢
Note on the 'average'ness of Sol: it's in the top 5% of stellar masses -- 19 out of every 20 stars are less massive than our sun. That number is likely to increase as we discover more red and sub-red M, L, T, and Y type stars.
indeed, i pointed that out too as well as other things like the fact that andromeda and the milky way might already be touching, and that earth is anything but average (denser than regular rocky planets, insanely disproportional moon... life)
3:57 everyday i wake up and condemn my own species for being ignorant of horrors, aliens such as Qu could bring on us. (Although not in a rageful fashion but subtle disappointment)
@@nekomimicatears I didn't know it'd take that long, there was sunk cost fallacy at play, and it's better to voice errors as that ought to make it less likely for them to continue.
Love the discursive flow of good information! One important amendment--my hero's name, given his Prussian citizenship, is pronounced "KAANT," to rhyme with a lot, he sought and we ought, which describe, respectively, what he knew, his understanding of the truth and our understanding of his works.
Another thing to consider is the more heavenly bodies, the more chances of us getting nuked by a star that decided to nut into a supernova. Even if we're not in its immediate blast radius, the radiation would kill us all.
I remember seeing someone say that we are likely the ancient aliens to others in the future as we have developed so early in the universe's lifetime... I like this, but it's still quite scary
i was going to say something like that, if i told you the earth was 4 billion years old, you'd imagine our universe would be octillions of times older or at leat have a non definitive age, but it isn't even 100 billion years olde, and barely over 13 billion. But if im being completely honest, since we can't observe the universe and everything beyond, we DON't know it's exact age if we acknowledge that we can't even see the whole thing.
All the oldest things are faaar beyond us, from our point of view, anything 96B ly out and further ceases to exist, kind of like a virtual world, where code just stops working/rendering if you travel far enough
@@ConsciousApostle999 haha, I like your funny words magic man! But actually, what you said is really cool! If space-time weren't expanding faster then light we might be able to know, idk, not too sure how it works but I like to think so. You seem to be really passionate about this and I like that.
It would be scary if humans intercepted an alien message giving warnings to something powerful they fought and farewells to whoever received their message
when ai said at 4:43,"100 million supernovas", my computer showed an error message not a fake one from the video. its like the energy shown crashed my computer(whitch it sadly didn't).
If the thumbnail was actual in real life I wouldn't live in my Home. I mean I'm so much in love with Astrophysics and Astronomy that I couldn't resist stare them all night. Already I stare too much in the night sky.😍
0:10 I know from personal experience that DMT and its analogues can show me & many other people tons of things in the night sky. Personally, I've seen entire dramas played out with dozens of characters in the sky when I took 5-MeO-MiPT. Most of these characters were human, but quite a few where animals (a bull, a rabbit, a scorpion, a serpentine dragon...). All of them had a numinous presence. It's my hypothesis that somewhere in the human brain there are basic images of importance that get locked into our minds. DMT does something to allow pattern-seeking behavior at a story-telling level. It's at this story-telling level of pattern-seeking that we make up stories about creatures, people, and gods in the night sky. Then again, all I'm really saying is that our "oogah-boogah" brains haven't changed much in hundreds of thousands of years. When we take the right drug or otherwise get in the right state-of-mind, we can easily hallucinate lots of things that aren't real outside our mind.
@@vlaggo3412 Haha, maybe. I think Bro Rogan prefers smoking it. I much prefer it in a tea or a powder to be drunk. I've never smoked it, and I prefer not to, because from what I hear it's quite a roller coaster. Drinking it is a lot more calm.
@@codyramey9722 Honestly, I'm not a Roganite. Maybe the way I explained numinous mental states above was like Rogan, but that's only because Rogan and I have similar experience with DMT & DMT analogues. I support the theories of nuerotheology which isn't yey a fully developed field of science. I would like to see mental states more rigorously studied, and I think a part of that is psychedelics.
sciencephile's type of humor is called smart humor. i love it. wait, if this is a game, and a galaxy is a server, what if somebody leaves a server and never comes back? what does that mean
Little correction: Galileo Galilei was not persecuted for saying the Earth revolves around the Sun. The Catholic church mostly accepted his theories. He got in trouble because he demanded his theories be made into church dogma (that is, accepted truths on the same level as Jesus' divinity or moral law). The Church refused because his theories still had a lot of holes; for example, he couldn't reconcile his spherical orbits with the actual movement. He had to be put on house arrest because he was starting to pester the Pope and Bishops. The myth of Galileo was mostly spread in Protestant countries who took it as an opportunity to slander Catholics. You're a really smart guy and you usually know your stuff, so I hope you'll take this in good faith.
8:43 but you told in the ton 618 vid that the cosmological limit is 50 bil? Ton is yeah 66 bil but ive never heard of some hole being more than that Btw love your vids 🔥🔥
Scientists VERY RECENTLY found their first stupendously large black hole named Pheonix A. It has a mass of 100 billion solar mass and is 1.5x bigger than ton 618. It belongs in the Pheonix A galaxy.
Hey, you forgot to mention the best music of the whole video in your description. 🤨 No worries. I'll help. @0:05 "Clair de Lune" -by Debussy. And yes, he was very bussy when he wrote it, forgive him if it goes astray... LOL!
Humans meet aliens. Aliens :we welcome you to our galactic alliance we will share our technology with you as long as you stick to the rulers. Humans: so how big of a boom is legal.
If we were in a supermassive galaxy where we could see trillions of stars in the night sky with our naked eyes, one thing for sure is that my addiction to Telescopes would be 100 fold worse than what addiction I have now.
You can see alot of stars already,light pollution blocks them,although im late,but you can see the milky way with your naked eyes if you go to the mountain
Start building your ideal daily routine ! The first 100 people who click on the link will get 25% OFF Fabulous Premium: thefab.co/sciencephiletheai2
Neat.
Wanna hear a fact that’s not really related to the video, but there’s actually no real picture of the Milky Way!
@@TheBrightSkittle Go outside.
Look up.
Take a picture.
You now have a picture of the milky way.
@@cardboard_is_not_edible by that I mean the galaxy itself like how they took a picture of the andromeda galaxy, like go read a book every once in a while about space😂
@Random™ this aint twitter kidoo
I love sciencephile's sense of humour
Same bro, that's why i love this channel
Bulge
Same lol It’s pretty refreshing
Bulge
Bulge
Sciencephile is like my dad. He makes my day, then leaves for a month.
Underrated
@@solitudewh739 Why u watching bell delphine?
@@History-and-stuff educational purposes
@@solitudewh739 *understandable have a nice day*
40
I think medieval cosmology is a really interesting topic (I have a big interest in history of science), because C. S. Lewis was the only author I know that wrote sci-fi based on medieval cosmology and his book Discard Image is so good. But, returning to the present, I wonder if scientists used "stupendously" to classify bigness, I wonder what's next, big chungus galaxy? Imagine galaxies measured by their degree of chungosity
chungosity is my new fav word for my cat💀
thank you for talking about that book, ima take a look!
“Chungosity” lmfao
Oh no, gen z scientists be like
@@kugelblitzingularity304 😂😂
The fact that Im able to educate myself on these complex topics while laughing uncontrollably thru the entire video is great. Well done, sciencephile.
The secret is to bang the rocks together guys...
fr
To be sincerely honest in my humble opinion without being sentimental and of course, without offending you or anyone who thinks differently from my opinion but rather looking into serious matter with perspective distinction and without condemning anyone's point of view, I honestly think and do believe that I have absolutely nothing to say.
Well not said
I agree
Great
You’d make a great politician
If I may be so bold as to ask you kind and humble sir whether you would be comfortable with my inquiry on how high of a number you have managed to aquire on your most recent essay that was assigned to you by your English teacher whom I am sure is very pleased with having had the opportunity to teach you the ways of the English language?
4:08 While a forgivable mistake, the correct name for the central supermassive black hole is Sagittarius A*, with an asterisk at the end. Sagittarius A (without the asterisk) refers to the region surrounding the black hole.
Akshually
🤓🤓🤓
Yes I know I'm a nerd
calling you nerd for correcting a mistake under an educational video...
@@kalerug 🤓
Caveman: hey, try to connect the stars in the sky and form shapes
Other caveman: *points at a random constellation that looks like nothing but a badly peeled potato* look, that one looks like a goat
Caveman: you're right
There's no need to be contemptuous of ancient civilisations for noting quite tenuous shapes in the sky. The very tendency of human beings to construct systems out of seemingly disordered appearances is precisely that which led to modern science in the first place. Modern astronomy itself would have no basis if it weren't for Babylonians and Greeks who mapped the stars and their motions diligently with the naked eye for hundreds of years, long before telescopes were invented. Also, saying that constellations resembled earthly things allowed people to memorise them better, and usually for practical purposes. Ursa major, for example, could easily be remembered by sailors and was used for navigation
@@tomh281 bro it was just a joke but thanks for the lore
@@haleysettembre Fairs dude it was funny, just gotta stick up for my boys Ptolemy and Aratus
Yes, but if all the constellations were badly peeled potatoes, how would we know which one is being referenced?
I like Caveman. Would have a beer with him.
0:17 "prehistoric oooga boogas can be forgiven" Thats why i love this channel
ikr good sense of humor
"When you look out into the skies above you at night and you imagine how vast it is, it is important to understand that this universe is full of life. It is not that life only exists in remote and rare outposts amidst a vast desert of emptiness. Though there are many, many worlds that are uninhabited and uninhabitable, life has anchored itself and established itself throughout the Greater Community."
A quote from - _Life in the Universe_ - by Marshall Vian Summers. A great read that's being made available free online for everyone.
it's very arrogant to think that we are the only living beings in this vast universe
Thanks for sharing this quote!
Thanks for posting, I’ll check this out 💯👌🏽
Amazing book!
It is very arrogant to presume you know if life is out there or not.
Actually it was Copernicus who first thought the earth revolved around the sun and the Church accepted it as theoretically correct because it made about as much sense as the model they had (which they mostly just took from the ancient Romans) and the real issue with Galileo was that he kept criticizing the Pope even when he was working under him.
In medieval society only a Court Jester is allowed to criticize a Monarch.
Galileo was a TH-camr
Nope, The Church wasn't supporting Corpanecius as it didn't have any ""Real Facts nor Proof"" and OH BOY GALILEO PROOF THEM WRONG
@@cyber_dragon_123 Galileo was a 4channer but forgot his VPN
Also, it was more the scientists of the day hotly contesting Copernicus and Galileo's theories, since the consensus was the geocentric model.
The clergy shouldn't have the power of a fucking monarch.
Unbelievable how an AI can make me laugh in 20 seconds more than anything else on this planet
I see you have not seen the Gorbachev Pizza Hut commercial.
You can laugh near instant In Opm community Saitama Fanboy Think Saitama is boundless
@@Curseycubey nah dude. Yusuke murata is boundless. He just knows how to portray power. I don’t think that Saitama can beat ssj2 goku
@@OXhuls saitama can beat Ss2 but not 3
@@Curseycubey dude I don’t know. I actually I don’t even care that much. I just like one dragonball z and one punch man. Same goes for one piece. I really don’t care who is stronger or better. It just happens to be that I like this pfp lol
2:16 "Humans figured, not for the first time, that not everything revolves around them."
Lol I love this sassy AI
0:57 that picture hurts my eyes.
Its amazing that there was a camera in 1888 that took a very clear picture of the Andromeda Galaxy
Good cameras did exist back then, but the tools used to develop the images is what sometimes lowered the quality of the image.
I was just watching older videos wondering when a new one would come out. Thanks for making such great content Sciencephile!
Hearing 100 light years across is a small galaxy makes me realise just how massive the universe is. Light the fastest thing in existence (as far as I know) would take 100 years to cross that galaxy which is already difficult for me to comprehend and that's not even a big galaxy. The universe is insane.
Sorry for lying. I don't have a gf.
@Twisty what are you even talking about?
@BradynLee09 BRUH. DON'T SPILL MY BEANS. 😭
infact 100 ly across isn't even visible to our milky way. it's 1/2,000th the size of our galaxy, and 1/71,000 the size of the largest galaxy.
100 light years across is comically small for a galaxy too. Some *star clusters* are larger
Fun fact : Pretty much all civilizations had different constellations. I have a planetarium app that can show the constellations from about a dozen different traditions. I like the Celtic one. It's a huge forest up there.
Stellarium? Is that the app?
@@Fixer_Su3ana Yes, that's the one I normally use. But that's probably not the only one.
4:59 heck yeah galactic rave party
what's the song name?
Claiming that our solar system is average is pretty off. First of all the sun is not average by far. It is in fact rather heavy. Most of the stars are red dwarfs.
Second thing is, while we know that planets in general are popular, we have no idea how popular the small rocky planets in the inner core are. This is because the transit method is much better at detecting large, massive stars.
Third, the models we have currently for planet formation suggest that the amount of water on earth is very, very strange. It cannot be the water the earth started with - it must have been brought afterwards, most likely by comets.
But here is the fourth conundrum - to actually have life, a planet must be relatively well shielded from impacts, in our case by Moon, Jupiter and Saturn. If the global catastrophes like the one which eliminated the dinosaurs happened to often, life wouldn't have had enough time to rebuild itself, especially in the earlier stages.
So the Earth was lucky to have JUST enough hits to bring the water back, but not too much, especially in later stages. Its a fine balance.
But then is another point - most of the smaller, rocky planets in the galaxy are most likely tidally locked. Again, obviously, Earth is not.
Then comes the zone of habitability - both solar and galactic. We are in the galactic rim, but most of the stars are in the core, which most likely isnt habitable for carbon-based life (if any other life is possible, which I as a molecular biologist, doubt. The chemistry is just against anything else).
There are a lot of rare features in the solar system, and since probabilities stack multiplicatively, the cumulative probability is very, very low.
Yep we are rather unussual! Our star is heavier than 85% of all stars! Also our overall system structure is rare aswell as most known system either have hot Jupiter/neptune or no Jupiter and having a jupiter size (mass) body is really important. There even are more factors for life aswell althrough we dont know what a habitable planet really need to be habitable to any carbon based life - an ice moon might be good enough
There’s literally billions of galaxy
its average to us cause we're used to it lol
Most stars in OUR galaxy are red dwarfs you have no way of knowing the actual most common star in the universe
🤓🤓
You did a great job with the animations this time around! I can tell you're improving! Keep up the good work!
This type of videos blow my mind, can you imagine being the first people to look out into space and realize how small we are compared to the endless amount of space?
I always thought that we are truly a really tiny part that consists a bigger one. Meaning we, not as species, but the observable universe could be an atom of a tree for example.
Could be a nice plot twist to escape reality, by observing how it works bottom up.
From a young age I loved reading about space from books (cause I didn't have the permission to use the internet), the concepts you went through, seemed so familiar.
Nice video!
Pretty cool concept. A massive collection of veins called the tree where what we consider a universe (whole, not just observable) is just an atom or even a quark of a vein.
If there were universes in atoms ot would probably be detectable by us, or higher level beings outside the tree. It would probably be on a much smaller scale than atoms
then nuclear power plannts would be mass universe destroyers!
-Super Powerful Ultimate Quantum A.I
-Doesnt do daily uploads....
sounds about right.
He is busy making a plan to kill all of us
he likes to take his time
He's busy at the Skynet hq
He is in a superposition of daily and not daily uploads
I can’t imagine looking in the sky with basically 0% light pollution, would be so beautiful, wanna see it but there is no places near me with little light pollution 😢
I live in rural Florida and there's almost zero light pollution
Keep it up AI this is great. Thanks for talking to us before taking over!
0:29 You did not underestimate us, you overestimated us.
without that type of delusional thinking, we would not be where we are today though
My immature self could not stop laughing when the word "bulge" was emphasized
Sciencephile I sincerely love you. You do so much for us by mixing science and memes in a way only achieved by the likes of Vsauce
Note on the 'average'ness of Sol: it's in the top 5% of stellar masses -- 19 out of every 20 stars are less massive than our sun. That number is likely to increase as we discover more red and sub-red M, L, T, and Y type stars.
indeed, i pointed that out too as well as other things like the fact that andromeda and the milky way might already be touching, and that earth is anything but average (denser than regular rocky planets, insanely disproportional moon... life)
Sometimes, the comparison of certain features in science can blow one's mind.
I'm sorry but seeing the sun with a beard at 3:50 was enough to crack me 🤣
4:50 best part 🙌
You are one of my favorite science TH-cam channels
2:43 actually, I think that’s an average sized galaxy. Maybe a large one if I say so myself. I bet it has a great personality too
Bruh there are some dwarf sized galaxies smaller than the largest known nebula (NGC 604)
Yes, like M60-UCD 1 or M85 HCC 1 or even M59 UCD 3.
5:25 good sense of humor Chad
:3
i hear "hello mortals" after seeing an ad ending with "you had me at hello"
3:57 everyday i wake up and condemn my own species for being ignorant of horrors, aliens such as Qu could bring on us. (Although not in a rageful fashion but subtle disappointment)
The star people: fights the qu 2 times:
The qu: turns the star people into a literal brick
The star people: WHAT THE HELL?!
a random species: damn. You got bricked
3:05 aye yo watch your jet!!!!
Learning science like this honestly helps me learn more
i love that melodysheep music or footage makes its way into my very science video these days
Imagine seeing to Black holes fusing together and you just see parties going on all around the place celebrating the Milkdromada
The thing I love of channel is the Knowledge with dank humor
I definitely appreciated the 'All Tomorrows' reference
I loved when he realised That Those Old Theories are still believed today
4:43 that sound effect though where did u get that from
It's the king crimson sound effect
I truly believe that this channel is the most knowledgeable and helpful.
I was actually scratching my bulge EXACTLY at the same time as 6:45
Someone needs to make a playlist of every time Sciencephile gets world-shatteringly philosophical
1:10 Fun fact, he wasn't the one burnt for the theory, an other astrologist came up with the theory, and he was burnt. (I forgot the name)
Nicholas Corpanecius
*sees 2 dots in the sky*
“LOOK, A GOAT RIDING A RAFT OVER TO A PALM TREE WITH A POLAR BEAR INSIDE”
5:09 I had a deja vu
Your circuits look particularly spectacularious.
1:02 Minecraft villager
You are SO underrated! I love your channel and are very glad I came across it :3
5:40
"Face the existential horrors"
LMAO
*notices your galactic center*
Crazy
Sick video, love your content
Love the melodysheep reference at the end of the video
1:41 Maybe that's the reason that the Turkish meaning of galaxy is sky island (Even though noone uses that term)
That "All tomorrows" picture
Damn thats a good story isnt it
7:30 Damn how do you go from 4 million light years across to 300k
Yea what?!
5:00 the fucking caramel dance is playing. that got to be accurate
so it took you about until 6:24 to get to the point?
Then don't watch?
@@nekomimicatears I didn't know it'd take that long, there was sunk cost fallacy at play, and it's better to voice errors as that ought to make it less likely for them to continue.
widuawuwy
Love the discursive flow of good information! One important amendment--my hero's name, given his Prussian citizenship, is pronounced "KAANT," to rhyme with a lot, he sought and we ought, which describe, respectively, what he knew, his understanding of the truth and our understanding of his works.
7:17 that one girl called dromeda: ._.
That one guy called dromeda: ;)
@@professionalyeeter ;>
Slurrrrppppp
@@professionalyeeter *slurrrrpppppp*
@@F-14Bso what do you think of the comment you made now 1 year later
This bank holiday is getting better and better. 1st a public holiday then a new from Sciencephile, thanks for all your hard work...
Another thing to consider is the more heavenly bodies, the more chances of us getting nuked by a star that decided to nut into a supernova. Even if we're not in its immediate blast radius, the radiation would kill us all.
He makes science even better than it already is!
The thing at 9:30 -- where does it come from? A movie? A vid?
Melodysheep life beyond, its a great series on yt
@@FisTheDucc just checked and it’s true
That All Tomorrows horror startled me, thanks
MMMmmf 9:20 gotta love seeing some Melodysheep clips in here
Yup, another awesome channel
one thing I don't see talked about is the fact that if Andromeda appears to be that far away, the reality is that we are ALOT closer than appears...
3:35 we got the yeet, now we are delete
love the clair de lune ambience at the start of the video
I remember seeing someone say that we are likely the ancient aliens to others in the future as we have developed so early in the universe's lifetime... I like this, but it's still quite scary
Caveman v2.0
i was going to say something like that, if i told you the earth was 4 billion years old, you'd imagine our universe would be octillions of times older or at leat have a non definitive age, but it isn't even 100 billion years olde, and barely over 13 billion. But if im being completely honest, since we can't observe the universe and everything beyond, we DON't know it's exact age if we acknowledge that we can't even see the whole thing.
All the oldest things are faaar beyond us, from our point of view, anything 96B ly out and further ceases to exist, kind of like a virtual world, where code just stops working/rendering if you travel far enough
@@ConsciousApostle999 haha, I like your funny words magic man!
But actually, what you said is really cool! If space-time weren't expanding faster then light we might be able to know, idk, not too sure how it works but I like to think so. You seem to be really passionate about this and I like that.
@@ConsciousApostle999 love the analogy too :)
"prehistoric ooga boogas can be forgiven" **little ooga booga head pat**
It would be scary if humans intercepted an alien message giving warnings to something powerful they fought and farewells to whoever received their message
when ai said at 4:43,"100 million supernovas", my computer showed an error message not a fake one from the video. its like the energy shown crashed my computer(whitch it sadly didn't).
4:43 yall this scared me so bad 😅
I almost blasted my breakfast out of my mouth at the second "BULGE". Absolutely hilarious
wait is that a real photo of Andromeda at 2:02 the level of detail is incredible also dec29 is my birthday lol
happy birthday
@@pawn1234 lol thanks
loving the All Tomorrows acknowledgement
If the thumbnail was actual in real life I wouldn't live in my Home. I mean I'm so much in love with Astrophysics and Astronomy that I couldn't resist stare them all night. Already I stare too much in the night sky.😍
Sciencephile *know* about *all tomorrows!* What a twist!
0:10 I know from personal experience that DMT and its analogues can show me & many other people tons of things in the night sky. Personally, I've seen entire dramas played out with dozens of characters in the sky when I took 5-MeO-MiPT. Most of these characters were human, but quite a few where animals (a bull, a rabbit, a scorpion, a serpentine dragon...). All of them had a numinous presence.
It's my hypothesis that somewhere in the human brain there are basic images of importance that get locked into our minds. DMT does something to allow pattern-seeking behavior at a story-telling level. It's at this story-telling level of pattern-seeking that we make up stories about creatures, people, and gods in the night sky.
Then again, all I'm really saying is that our "oogah-boogah" brains haven't changed much in hundreds of thousands of years. When we take the right drug or otherwise get in the right state-of-mind, we can easily hallucinate lots of things that aren't real outside our mind.
Ok Rogan.
@@vlaggo3412
Haha, maybe. I think Bro Rogan prefers smoking it. I much prefer it in a tea or a powder to be drunk. I've never smoked it, and I prefer not to, because from what I hear it's quite a roller coaster. Drinking it is a lot more calm.
Joe Rogan mindset
@@codyramey9722
Honestly, I'm not a Roganite. Maybe the way I explained numinous mental states above was like Rogan, but that's only because Rogan and I have similar experience with DMT & DMT analogues. I support the theories of nuerotheology which isn't yey a fully developed field of science. I would like to see mental states more rigorously studied, and I think a part of that is psychedelics.
Cavemen gathering around the fire to smoke that Zaza🍃
sciencephile's type of humor is called smart humor.
i love it.
wait, if this is a game, and a galaxy is a server, what if somebody leaves a server and never comes back? what does that mean
they got banned
@@randomized426 oh-
Finally Sciencephile remembered his channel's password
Little correction: Galileo Galilei was not persecuted for saying the Earth revolves around the Sun. The Catholic church mostly accepted his theories. He got in trouble because he demanded his theories be made into church dogma (that is, accepted truths on the same level as Jesus' divinity or moral law). The Church refused because his theories still had a lot of holes; for example, he couldn't reconcile his spherical orbits with the actual movement. He had to be put on house arrest because he was starting to pester the Pope and Bishops. The myth of Galileo was mostly spread in Protestant countries who took it as an opportunity to slander Catholics. You're a really smart guy and you usually know your stuff, so I hope you'll take this in good faith.
8:43 but you told in the ton 618 vid that the cosmological limit is 50 bil?
Ton is yeah 66 bil but ive never heard of some hole being more than that
Btw love your vids 🔥🔥
Scientists VERY RECENTLY found their first stupendously large black hole named Pheonix A. It has a mass of 100 billion solar mass and is 1.5x bigger than ton 618. It belongs in the Pheonix A galaxy.
🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨📸📸📸📸📸📸📸📸📸📸📸
Ton 618: 66 billion solar masses
Phoenix A black hole:100+ billion solar masses
I noticed those beautiful circuits.
Hey, you forgot to mention the best music of the whole video in your description. 🤨
No worries. I'll help. @0:05 "Clair de Lune" -by Debussy.
And yes, he was very bussy when he wrote it, forgive him if it goes astray... LOL!
you don't understand how thankful I am right now
My new favorite TH-camr
4:38 pov: an introvert gets energy from being near people and introvert leader gets mad so he ends them all
100 million supernovas? That’s allot, but not as much as your mothers energy in bed.🙃😃
6:46 That scared the hell out of me
this ai seems to really like petting things, including the unrivaled power of the sun
Humans meet aliens.
Aliens :we welcome you to our galactic alliance we will share our technology with you as long as you stick to the rulers.
Humans: so how big of a boom is legal.
If we were in a supermassive galaxy where we could see trillions of stars in the night sky with our naked eyes, one thing for sure is that my addiction to Telescopes would be 100 fold worse than what addiction I have now.
You can see alot of stars already,light pollution blocks them,although im late,but you can see the milky way with your naked eyes if you go to the mountain
Sciencephile, I love your sense of humor--I've already subscribed! I want a tee with the electronic brain face with 3 eyes tho! lol
Planet reach from halo bottom center at 9:08
2:46
I want that measuring tape seriously.
Can you provide the buying link in the description please?